Melphalan is an alkylating agent of the bischloroethylamine type. As a result,
its cytotoxicity appears to be related to the extent of its interstrand cross-linking
with DNA, probably by binding at the N7 position of guanine. Like
other bifunctional alkylating agents, it is active against both resting and
rapidly dividing tumor cells.
Pharmacokinetics
The pharmacokinetics of melphalan after IV administration has been extensively
studied in adult patients. Following injection, drug plasma concentrations declined
rapidly in a biexponential manner with distribution phase and terminal elimination
phase half-lives of approximately 10 and 75 minutes, respectively. Estimates
of average total body clearance varied among studies, but typical values of
approximately 7 to 9 mL/min/kg (250 to 325 mL/min/m²) were observed. One
study has reported that on repeat dosing of 0.5 mg/kg every 6 weeks, the clearance
of melphalan decreased from 8.1 mL/min/kg after the first course, to 5.5 mL/min/kg
after the third course, but did not decrease appreciably after the third course.
Mean (±SD) peak melphalan plasma concentrations in myeloma patients given
IV melphalan at doses of 10 or 20 mg/m²were 1.2 ± 0.4 and 2.8 ±
1.9 mcg/mL, respectively.
The steady-state volume of distribution of melphalan is 0.5 L/kg. Penetration
into cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) is low. The extent of melphalan binding to plasma
proteins ranges from 60% to 90%. Serum albumin is the major binding protein,
while α 1-acid glycoprotein appears to account for about 20%
of the plasma protein binding. Approximately 30% of the drug is (covalently)
irreversibly bound to plasma proteins. Interactions with immunoglobulins have
been found to be negligible.
Melphalan is eliminated from plasma primarily by chemical hydrolysis to monohydroxymelphalan
and dihydroxymelphalan. Aside from these hydrolysis products, no other melphalan
metabolites have been observed in humans. Although the contribution of renal
elimination to melphalan clearance appears to be low, one study noted an increase
in the occurrence of severe leukopenia in patients with elevated BUN after 10
weeks of therapy.
Clinical Trial
A randomized trial compared prednisone plus IV melphalan to prednisone plus
oral melphalan in the treatment of myeloma. As discussed below, overall response
rates at week 22 were comparable; however, because of changes in trial design,
conclusions as to the relative activity of the 2 formulations after week 22
are impossible to make.
Both arms received oral prednisone starting at 0.8 mg/kg/day with doses tapered
over 6 weeks. Melphalan doses in each arm were:
Arm 1: Oral melphalan 0.15 mg/kg/day x 7 followed by 0.05 mg/kg/day when WBC
began to rise.
Arm 2: IV melphalan 16 mg/m² q 2 weeks x 4 (over 6 weeks) followed by
the same dose every 4 weeks.
Doses of melphalan were adjusted according to the following criteria:
Table 1. Criteria for Dosage Adjustment in a Randomized Clinical
Trial
| WBC/mm³ |
Platelets |
Percent of Full Dose |
| ≥ 4,000 |
≥ 100,000 |
100 |
| ≥ 3,000 |
≥ 75,000 |
75 |
| ≥ 2,000 |
≥ 50,000 |
50 |
| < 2,000 |
< 50,000 |
0 |
One hundred seven patients were randomized to the oral melphalan arm and 203
patients to the IV melphalan arm. More patients had a poor-risk classification
(58% versus 44%) and high tumor load (51% versus 34%) on the oral compared to
the IV arm (P < 0.04). Response rates at week 22 are shown in the following
table:
Table 2. Response Rates at Week 22
| Initial Arm |
Evaluable Patients |
Respondersn (%) |
P |
| Oral melphalan |
100 |
44 (44%) |
P > 0.2 |
| IV melphalan |
195 |
74 (38%) |
Because of changes in protocol design after week 22, other efficacy parameters
such as response duration and survival cannot be compared.
Severe myelotoxicity (WBC ≤ 1,000 and/or platelets ≤ 25,000) was more common
in the IV melphalan arm (28%) than in the oral melphalan arm (11%).
An association was noted between poor renal function and myelosuppression;
consequently, an amendment to the protocol required a 50% reduction in IV melphalan
dose if the BUN was ≥ 30 mg/dL. The rate of severe leukopenia in the IV arm
in the patients with BUN over 30 mg/dL decreased from 50% (8/16) before protocol
amendment to 11% (3/28) (P = 0.01) after the amendment.
Before the dosing amendment, there was a 10% (8/77) incidence of drug-related
death in the IV arm. After the dosing amendment, this incidence was 3% (3/108).
This compares to an overall 1% (1/100) incidence of drug-related death in the
oral arm.
Last updated on RxList: 1/21/2009