Mechanism of Action
Tipranavir is an antiviral drug.
Pharmacodynamics
ECG Evaluation
The effect of APTIVUS/ritonavir on the QTcF interval was measured in a study in which 81 healthy subjects received the following treatments twice daily for 2.5 days: APTIVUS/ritonavir (500/200 mg), APTIVUS/ritonavir at a supra-therapeutic dose (750/200 mg), and placebo/ritonavir (-/200 mg). After baseline and placebo adjustment, the maximum mean QTcF change was 3.2 ms (1-sided 95% Upper CI: 5.6 ms) for the 500/200 mg dose and 8.3 ms (1-sided 95% Upper CI: 10.9 ms) for the supra-therapeutic 750/200 mg dose.
Antiviral Activity in vivo
The median Inhibitory Quotient (IQ) determined from 264 treatment-experienced
adult patients was about 80 (inter-quartile range: 31-226), from the controlled
clinical trials 1182.12 and 1182.48. The IQ is defined as the tipranavir trough
concentration divided by the viral EC50 value, corrected for protein binding.
There was a relationship between the proportion of patients with a ≥ 1 log10
reduction of viral load from baseline at week 48 and their IQ value. Among the
198 patients receiving APTIVUS/ritonavir with no new enfuvirtide use (e.g.,
new enfuvirtide, defined as initiation of enfuvirtide for the first time), the
response rate was 23% in those with an IQ value < 80 and 59% in those with
an IQ value ≥ 80. Among the 66 patients receiving APTIVUS/ritonavir with new
enfuvirtide, the response rates in patients with an IQ value < 80 versus those
with an IQ value ≥ 80 were 55% and 71%, respectively. These IQ groups are
derived from a select population and are not meant to represent clinical breakpoints.
Pharmacokinetics
In order to achieve effective tipranavir plasma concentrations and a twice-daily
dosing regimen, co-administration of APTIVUS with ritonavir is essential [see
DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION]. Ritonavir inhibits hepatic cytochrome P450
3A (CYP 3A), the intestinal P-gp efflux pump and possibly intestinal CYP 3A.
In a dose-ranging evaluation in 113 HIV-1 negative male and female volunteers,
there was a 29-fold increase in the geometric mean morning steady-state trough
plasma concentrations of tipranavir following APTIVUS co-administered with low-dose
ritonavir (500/200 mg twice daily) compared to APTIVUS 500 mg twice daily without
ritonavir. In adults the mean systemic ritonavir concentration when 200 mg of
ritonavir was given with 500 mg of APTIVUS was similar to the concentrations
observed when 100 mg was given with the other protease inhibitors.
Figure 1 displays mean plasma concentrations of tipranavir and ritonavir at steady state for 30 HIV-1 infected adult patients dosed with 500/200 mg tipranavir/ritonavir for 14 days.
Figure 1: Mean Steady State Tipranavir Plasma Concentrations
(95% CI) with Ritonavir Co-administration (tipranavir/ritonavir 500/200 mg BID)
Absorption and Bioavailability
Absorption of tipranavir in humans is limited, although no absolute quantification
of absorption is available. Tipranavir is a P-gp substrate, a weak P-gp inhibitor,
and appears to be a potent P-gp inducer as well. In vivo data suggest
that tipranavir/ritonavir, at the dose of 500/200 mg, is a P-gp inhibitor after
the first dose and induction of P-gp occurs over time. Tipranavir trough concentrations
at steady-state are about 70% lower than those on Day 1, presumably due to intestinal
P-gp induction. Steady state is attained in most subjects after 7-10 days of
dosing.
Dosing APTIVUS 500 mg with 200 mg ritonavir twice daily for greater than 2 weeks and without meal restriction produced the pharmacokinetic parameters for male and female HIV-1 positive patients presented in Table 5.
Table 5: Pharmacokinetic Parametersa of tipranavir/ritonavir
500/200 mg for HIV-1 Positive Patients by Gender
| |
Females
(n=14) |
Males
(n=106) |
| Cptrough (µM) |
41.6 ± 24.3 |
35.6 ± 16.7 |
| Cmax (µM) |
94.8 ± 22.8 |
77.6 ± 16.6 |
| Tmax (h) |
2.9 |
3.0 |
| AUC0-12h (µM•h) |
851 ± 309 |
710 ± 207 |
| CL (L/h) |
1.15 |
1.27 |
| V (L) |
7.7 |
10.2 |
| t1/2 (h) |
5.5 |
6.0 |
| a Population pharmacokinetic parameters reported as mean ±
standard deviation |
Effects of Food on Oral Absorption
For APTIVUS capsules or oral solution co-administered with ritonavir at steady-state,
no clinically significant changes in Cmax , Cp12h, and AUC were observed under
fed conditions (500-682 Kcal, 23-25% calories from fat) compared to fasted conditions.
APTIVUS co-administered with ritonavir may be taken with or without food, [see
DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION].
Distribution
Tipranavir is extensively bound to plasma proteins ( > 99.9%). It binds to
both human serum albumin and α-1-acid glycoprotein. The mean fraction of tipranavir
(dosed without ritonavir) unbound in plasma was similar in clinical samples
from healthy volunteers and HIV-1 positive patients. Total plasma tipranavir
concentrations for these samples ranged from 9 to 82 µM. The unbound fraction
of tipranavir appeared to be independent of total drug concentration over this
concentration range.
No studies have been conducted to determine the distribution of tipranavir into human cerebrospinal fluid or semen.
Metabolism
In vitro metabolism studies with human liver microsomes indicated that
CYP 3A4 is the predominant CYP enzyme involved in tipranavir metabolism.
The oral clearance of tipranavir decreased after the addition of ritonavir, which may represent diminished first-pass clearance of the drug at the gastrointestinal tract as well as the liver.
The metabolism of tipranavir in the presence of 200 mg ritonavir is minimal.
Administration of 14C-tipranavir to subjects that received APTIVUS/ritonavir
500/200 mg dosed to steady-state demonstrated that unchanged tipranavir accounted
for 98.4% or greater of the total plasma radioactivity circulating at 3, 8,
or 12 hours after dosing. Only a few metabolites were found in plasma, and all
were at trace levels (0.2% or less of the plasma radioactivity). In feces, unchanged
tipranavir represented the majority of fecal radioactivity (79.9% of fecal radioactivity).
The most abundant fecal metabolite, at 4.9% of fecal radioactivity (3.2% of
dose), was a hydroxyl metabolite of tipranavir. In urine, unchanged tipranavir
was found in trace amounts (0.5% of urine radioactivity). The most abundant
urinary metabolite, at 11.0% of urine radioactivity (0.5% of dose) was a glucuronide
conjugate of tipranavir.
Elimination
Administration of 14C-tipranavir to subjects (n=8) that received
APTIVUS/ritonavir 500/200 mg dosed to steady-state demonstrated that most radioactivity
(median 82.3%) was excreted in feces, while only a median of 4.4% of the radioactive
dose administered was recovered in urine. In addition, most radioactivity (56%)
was excreted between 24 and 96 hours after dosing. The effective mean elimination
half-life of tipranavir/ritonavir in healthy volunteers (n=67) and HIV-1 infected
adult patients (n=120) was approximately 4.8 and 6.0 hours, respectively, at
steady state following a dose of 500/200 mg twice daily with a light meal.
Special Populations
Renal Impairment
APTIVUS pharmacokinetics have not been studied in patients with renal dysfunction.
However, since the renal clearance of tipranavir is negligible, a decrease in
total body clearance is not expected in patients with renal insufficiency.
Hepatic Impairment
In a study comparing 9 HIV-1 negative patients with mild (Child-Pugh Class A) hepatic impairment to 9 HIV-1 negative controls, the single and multiple dose plasma concentrations of tipranavir and ritonavir were increased in patients with hepatic impairment, but were within the range observed in clinical trials. No dosing adjustment is required in patients with mild hepatic impairment.
The influence of moderate hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh Class B) or severe
hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh Class C) on the multiple-dose pharmacokinetics
of tipranavir administered with ritonavir has not been evaluated [see DOSAGE
AND ADMINISTRATION, CONTRAINDICATIONS, and
WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS].
Gender
Evaluation of steady-state plasma tipranavir trough concentrations at 10-14 h after dosing from the controlled clinical trials 1182.12 and 1182.48 demonstrated that females generally had higher tipranavir concentrations than males. After 4 weeks of APTIVUS/ritonavir 500/200 mg BID, the median plasma trough concentration of tipranavir was 43.9 µM for females and 31.1 µM for males. The difference in concentrations does not warrant a dose adjustment.
Race
Evaluation of steady-state plasma tipranavir trough concentrations at 10-14 h after dosing from the controlled clinical trials 1182.12 and 1182.48 demonstrated that white males generally had more variability in tipranavir concentrations than black males, but the median concentration and the range making up the majority of the data are comparable between the races.
Geriatric Patients
Evaluation of steady-state plasma tipranavir trough concentrations at 10-14 h after dosing from the controlled clinical trials 1182.12 and 1182.48 demonstrated that there was no change in median trough tipranavir concentrations as age increased for either gender through 65 years of age. There were an insufficient number of women greater than age 65 years in the two trials to evaluate the elderly.
Pediatric Patients
Among pediatric patients in clinical trial 1182.14, steady-state plasma tipranavir
trough concentrations were obtained 10 to 14 hours following study drug administration.
Pharmacokinetic parameters by age group are presented in Table 6.
Table 6: Pharmacokinetic Parametersa of tipranavir/ritonavir
375 mg/m2/150 mg/m2 for HIV-1 Positive Pediatric Patients
by Age
| Parameter |
2 to < 6 years
(n=12) |
6 to < 12 years
(n=8) |
12 to 18 years
(n=6) |
| Cptrough (µM) |
59.6 ± 23.6 |
66.3 ± 12.5 |
53.3 ± 32.4 |
| Cmax (µM) |
135 ± 44 |
151 ± 32 |
138 ± 52 |
| Tmax (h) |
2.5 |
2.6 |
2.7 |
| AUC0-12h (µM•h) |
1190 ± 332 |
1354 ± 256 |
1194 ± 517 |
| CL/F (L/h) |
0.34 |
0.45 |
0.99 |
| V (L) |
4.0 |
4.7 |
5.3 |
| t1/2 (h) |
8.1 |
7.1 |
5.2 |
| a Population pharmacokinetic parameters reported
as mean ± standard deviation |
Drug Interactions
Drug interaction studies were performed with APTIVUS capsules co-administered
with ritonavir, and other drugs likely to be co-administered and some drugs
commonly used as probes for pharmacokinetic interactions. The effects of co-administration
of APTIVUS with 200 mg ritonavir on the AUC, Cmax, and Cmin of tipranavir or
the co-administered drug, are summarized in Tables 7 and 8, respectively. For
information regarding clinical recommendations see DRUG INTERACTIONS
Table 7: Drug Interactions: Pharmacokinetic Parameters for
Tipranavir in the Presence of Co-administered Drugs
| Co-administered Drug |
Co-administered Drug Dose (Schedule)
|
tipranavir/ ritonavir Drug Dose
(Schedule) |
n |
PK |
Ratio (90% Confidence Interval) of Tipranavir
Pharmacokinetic Parameters with/without Co-administered Drug;
No Effect = 1.00 |
| Cmax |
AUC |
Cmin |
| Antacids (Maalox®) |
20 mL
(1 dose) |
500/200 mg
(1 dose) |
23 |
↓ |
0.75 (0.63, 0.88) |
0.73 (0.64, 0.84) |
- |
| Atazanavir/ritonavir |
300/100 mg QD
(9 doses) |
500/100 mg BID
(34 doses) |
13 |
↑ |
1.08 (0.98, 1.20) |
1.20 (1.09, 1.32) |
1.75 (1.39, 2.20) |
| Atorvastatin |
10 mg
(1 dose) |
500/200 mg BID
(14 doses) |
22 |
↔ |
0.96 (0.86, 1.07) |
1.08 (1.00, 1.15) |
1.04 (0.89, 1.22) |
| Clarithromycin |
500 mg BID (25 doses) |
500/200 mg BID* |
24 (68) |
↑ |
1.40 (1.24, 1.47) |
1.66 (1.43, 1.73) |
2.00 (1.58, 2.47) |
| Didanosine |
400 mg
(1 dose) |
500/100 mg BID
(27 doses) |
5 |
↓ |
1.32 (1.09, 1.60) |
1.08 (0.82, 1.42) |
0.66 (0.31, 1.43) |
| Efavirenz |
600 mg QD
(8 doses) |
500/100 mg BID* |
21 (89) |
↓ |
0.79 (0.69, 0.89) |
0.69 (0.57, 0.83) |
0.58 (0.36, 0.86) |
| |
750/200 mg BID* |
25 (100) |
↔ |
0.97 (0.85, 1.09) |
1.01 (0.85, 1.18) |
0.97 (0.69, 1.28) |
| Ethinyl estradiol /Norethindrone |
0.035/1.0 mg
(1 dose) |
500/100 mg BID
(21 doses) |
21 |
↓ |
1.10 (0.98, 1.24) |
0.98 (0.88, 1.11) |
0.73 (0.59, 0.90) |
| |
750/200 mg BID
(21 doses) |
13 |
↔ |
1.01 (0.96, 1.06) |
0.98 (0.90, 1.07) |
0.91 (0.69, 1.20) |
| Fluconazole |
100 mg QD
(12 doses) |
500/200 mg BID* |
20 (68) |
↑ |
1.32 (1.18, 1.47) |
1.50 (1.29, 1.73) |
1.69 (1.33, 2.09) |
| Loperamide |
16 mg
(1 dose) |
750/200 mg BID
(21 doses) |
24 |
↓ |
1.03 (0.92, 1.17) |
0.98 (0.86, 1.12) |
0.74 (0.62, 0.88) |
| Rifabutin |
150 mg
(1 dose) |
500/200 mg BID
(15 doses) |
21 |
↔ |
0.99 (0.93, 1.07) |
1.00 (0.96, 1.04) |
1.16 (1.07, 1.27) |
| Rosuvastatin |
10 mg
(1 dose) |
500/200 mg BID
(24 Doses) |
16 |
↔ |
1.08 (1.00, 1.17) |
1.06 (0.97, 1.15) |
0.99 (0.88, 1.11) |
| Tadalafil |
10 mg
(1 dose) |
500/200 mg BID
(17 doses) |
17 |
↔ |
0.90 (0.80, 1.01) |
0.85 (0.74, 0.97) |
0.81 (0.70, 0.94) |
| Tenofovir |
300 mg
(1 dose) |
500/100 mg BID |
22 |
↓ |
0.83 (0.74, 0.94) |
0.82 (0.75, 0.91) |
0.79 (0.70, 0.90) |
| |
750/200 mg BID
(23 doses) |
20 |
↔ |
0.89 (0.84, 0.96) |
0.91 (0.85, 0.97) |
0.88 (0.78, 1.00) |
| Zidovudine |
300 mg
(1 dose) |
500/100 mg BID |
29 |
↓ |
0.87 (0.80, 0.94) |
0.82 (0.76, 0.89) |
0.77 (0.68, 0.87) |
| |
|
750/200 mg BID
(23 doses) |
25 |
↔ |
1.02 (0.94, 1.10) |
1.02 (0.92, 1.13) |
1.07 (0.86, 1.34) |
*steady state comparison to historical data (n)
↑ increase, ↓ decrease, ↔ no change, ↨ unable to predict
|
Table 8: Drug Interactions: Pharmacokinetic Parameters for
Co-administered Drug in the Presence of APTIVUS/ritonavir
| Co-administered Drug |
Co-administered Drug Dose (Schedule) |
tipranavir/ritonavir Drug Dose
(Schedule) |
n |
PK |
Ratio (90% Confidence Interval) of Co-administered
Drug Pharmacokinetic Parameters with/without tipranavir/ritonavir;
No Effect = 1.00 |
| Cmax |
AUC |
Cmin |
| Amprenavir/ritonavira |
600/100 mg BID
(27 doses) |
500/200 mg BID
(28 doses) |
16 |
↓ |
0.61 (0.51, 0.73)e |
0.56 (0.49, 0.64)e |
0.45 (0.38, 0.53)e |
| 74 |
↓ |
- |
|
0.44 (0.39, 0.49)f |
| Abacavira |
300 mg BID
(43 doses) |
250/200 mg BID |
28 |
↓ |
0.56 (0.48, 0.66) |
0.56 (0.49, 0.63) |
- |
| 750/100 mg BID |
14 |
↓ |
0.54 (0.47, 0.63) |
0.64 (0.55, 0.74) |
- |
1250/100 mg BID
(42 doses) |
11 |
↓ |
0.48 (0.42, 0.53) |
0.65 (0.55, 0.76) |
- |
| Atazanavir/ritonavir |
300/100 mg QD
(9 doses) |
500/100 mg BID
(34 doses) |
13 |
↓ |
0.43 (0.38, 0.50) |
0.32 (0.29, 0.36) |
0.19 (0.15, 0.24) |
| Atorvastatin |
10 mg
(1 dose) |
500/200 mg BID
(17 doses) |
22 |
↑ |
8.61 (7.25, 10.21) |
9.36 (8.02, 10.94) |
5.19 (4.21, 6.40) |
| Orthohydroxy -atorvastatin Parahydroxy -atorvastatin
|
|
21, 12, 17 |
↓ |
0.02 (0.02, 0.03) |
0.11 (0.08, 0.17) |
0.07 (0.06, 0.08) |
| |
13, 22, 1 |
↓ |
1.04 (0.87, 1.25) |
0.18 (0.14, 0.24) |
0.33 (NA) |
| Buprenorphine/Naloxoneb |
16/4 mg 24/6 mg (daily) |
500/200 mg BID
(16 doses) |
|
|
|
|
|
| Buprenorphine |
|
|
10 |
↔ |
0.86 (0.68, 1.10) |
0.99 (0.80, 1.23) |
0.94 (0.74, 1.19) |
| Carbamazepine |
100 mg BID
(29 doses) |
500/200 mg
(1 dose) |
7 |
↔ |
1.04 (1.00, 1.07) |
1.05 (1.02, 1.09) |
1.17 (1.11, 1.24) |
| (43 doses) |
(15 doses) |
7 |
↔ |
1.10 (0.85, 1.42) |
1.08 (0.91, 1.27) |
1.07 (0.90, 1.27) |
| 200 mg BID (29 doses) |
500/200 mg
(1 dose) |
17 |
↔ |
1.00 (0.96, 1.04) |
1.04 (1.00, 1.08) |
1.16 (1.11, 1.22) |
| (43 doses) |
(15 doses) |
17 |
↑ |
1.22 (1.11, 1.34) |
1.26 (1.15, 1.38) |
1.35 (1.22, 1.50) |
| Clarithromycin |
500 mg BID
(25 doses) |
500/200 mg BID
(15 doses) |
21 |
↑ |
0.95 (0.83, 1.09) |
1.19 (1.04, 1.37) |
1.68 (1.42, 1.98) |
| 14-OH-clarithromycin |
|
21 |
↓ |
0.03 (0.02, 0.04) |
0.03 (0.02, 0.04) |
0.05 (0.04, 0.07) |
| Didanosinec |
200 mg BID, ≥ 60 kg |
250/200 mg BID |
10 |
↓ |
0.57 (0.42, 0.79) |
0.67 (0.51, 0.88) |
- |
| 125 mg BID, < 60 kg (43 doses) |
750/100 mg BID |
8 |
↔ |
0.76 (0.49, 1.17) |
0.97 (0.64, 1.47) |
- |
| |
1250/100 mg BID
(42 doses) |
9 |
↔ |
0.77 (0.47, 1.26) |
0.87 (0.47, 1.65) |
- |
400 mg
(1 dose) |
500/100 mg BID
(27 doses) |
5 |
↔ |
0.80 (0.63, 1.02) |
0.90 (0.72, 1.11) |
1.17 (0.62, 2.20) |
| Efavirenzc |
600 mg QD
(15 doses) |
500/100 mg BID |
24 |
↔ |
1.09 (0.99, 1.19) |
1.04 (0.97, 1.12) |
1.02 (0.92, 1.12) |
750/200 mg BID
(15 doses) |
22 |
↔ |
1.12 (0.98, 1.28) |
1.00 (0.93, 1.09) |
0.94 (0.84, 1.04) |
| Ethinyl estradiol |
0.035 mg
(1 dose) |
500/100 mg BID |
21 |
↓ |
0.52 (0.47, 0.57) |
0.52 (0.48, 0.56) |
- |
750/200 mg BID
(21 doses) |
13 |
↓ |
0.48 (0.42, 0.57) |
0.57 (0.54, 0.60) |
- |
| Fluconazole |
200 mg (Day 1) then 100 mg QD
(6 or 12 doses) |
500/200 mg BID
(2 or 14 doses) |
19 |
↔ |
0.97 (0.94, 1.01) |
0.99 (0.97, 1.02) |
0.98 (0.94, 1.02) |
| 19 |
↔ |
0.94 (0.91, 0.98) |
0.92 (0.88, 0.95) |
0.89 (0.85, 0.92) |
| Lopinavir/ritonavira |
400/100 mg BID
(27 doses) |
500/200 mg BID
(28 doses) |
21 |
↓ |
0.53 (0.40, 0.69)e |
0.45 (0.32, 0.63)e |
0.30 (0.17, 0.51)e |
| 69 |
↓ |
- |
- |
0.48 (0.40, 0.58)f |
| Loperamide |
16 mg (1 dose) |
750/200 mg BID
(21 doses) |
24 |
↓ |
0.39 (0.31, 0.48) |
0.49 (0.40, 0.61) |
- |
| N-Demethyl-Loperamide |
|
24 |
↓ |
0.21 (0.17, 0.25) |
0.23 (0.19, 0.27) |
- |
| Lamivudinea |
150 mg BID |
250/200 mg BID |
64 |
↔ |
0.96 (0.89, 1.03) |
0.95 (0.89, 1.02) |
- |
| (43 doses) |
750/100 mg BID |
46 |
↔ |
0.86 (0.78, 0.94) |
0.96 (0.90, 1.03) |
- |
| |
1250/100 mg BID
(42 doses) |
35 |
↔ |
0.71 (0.62, 0.81) |
0.82 (0.66, 1.00) |
- |
Methadone
R-methadone
S-methadone |
5 mg
(1 dose) |
500/200 mg BID
(16 doses) |
14 |
↓ |
0.45 (0.41, 0.49) |
0.47 (0.44, 0.51) |
0.50 (0.46, 0.54) |
| 0.54 (0.50, 0.58) |
0.52 (0.49, 0.56) |
- |
| 0.38 (0.35, 0.43) |
0.37 (0.34, 0.41) |
- |
| Nevirapinea |
200 mg BID |
250/200 mg BID |
26 |
↔ |
0.97 (0.90, 1.04) |
0.97 (0.91, 1.04) |
0.96 (0.87, 1.05) |
| (43 doses) |
750/100 mg BID |
22 |
↔ |
0.86 (0.76, 0.97) |
0.89 (0.78, 1.01) |
0.93 (0.80, 1.08) |
| |
1250/100 mg BID
(42 doses) |
17 |
↔ |
0.71 (0.62, 0.82) |
0.76 (0.63, 0.91) |
0.77 (0.64, 0.92) |
| Norethindrone |
1.0 mg
(1 dose) |
500/100 mg BID |
21 |
↔ |
1.03 (0.94, 1.13) |
1.14 (1.06, 1.22) |
- |
750/200 mg BID
(21 doses) |
13 |
↔ |
1.08 (0.97, 1.20) |
1.27 (1.13, 1.43) |
- |
Rifabutin
25-O-desacetyl-rifabutin Rifabutin + 25-O-desacetyl-rifabutind |
150 mg (1 dose) |
500/200 mg BID
(15 doses) |
20 |
↑ |
1.70 (1.49, 1.94) |
2.90 (2.59, 3.26) |
2.14 (1.90, 2.41) |
| 20 |
↑ |
3.20 (2.78, 3.68) |
20.71 (17.66, 24.28) |
7.83 (6.70, 9.14) |
| 20 |
↑ |
1.86 (1.63, 2.12) |
4.33 (3.86, 4.86) |
2.76 (2.44, 3.12) |
| Rosuvastatin |
10 mg (1 dose) |
500/200 mg BID
(24 doses) |
16 |
↑ |
2.23 (1.83, 2.72) |
1.26 (1.08, 1.46) |
1.06 (0.93, 1.20) |
| Saquinavir/ritonavira |
600/100 mg BID
(27 doses) |
500/200 mg BID
(28 doses) |
20 |
↓ |
0.30 (0.23, 0.40)e |
0.24 (0.19, 0.32)e |
0.18 (0.13, 0.26)e |
| 68 |
↓ |
- |
- |
0.20 (0.16, 0.25)f |
| Stavudinea |
40 mg BID ≥ 60 kg |
250/200 mg BID |
26 |
↔ |
0.90 (0.81, 1.02) |
1.00 (0.91, 1.11) |
- |
| 750/100 mg BID |
22 |
↔ |
0.76 (0.66, 0.89) |
0.84 (0.74, 0.96) |
- |
30 mg BID < 60 kg
(43 doses) |
1250/100 mg BID |
19 |
↔ |
0.74 (0.69, 0.80) |
0.93 (0.83, 1.05) |
- |
| Tadalafil |
10 mg (1 dose) |
500/200 mg
(1 dose) |
17 |
↑ |
0.78 (0.72, 0.84) |
2.33 (2.02, 2.69) |
- |
| 10 mg (1 dose) |
500/200 mg BID
(17 doses) |
17 |
↔ |
0.70 (0.63, 0.78) |
1.01 (0.83, 1.21) |
- |
| Tenofovir |
300 mg |
500/100 mg BID |
22 |
↓ |
0.77 (0.68, 0.87) |
0.98 (0.91, 1.05) |
1.07 (0.98, 1.17) |
| (1 dose) |
750/200 mg BID (23 doses) |
20 |
↓ |
0.62 (0.54, 0.71) |
1.02 (0.94, 1.10) |
1.14 (1.01, 1.27) |
| Zidovudinec |
300 mg BID |
250/200 mg BID |
48 |
↓ |
0.54 (0.47, 0.62) |
0.58 (0.51, 0.66) |
- |
| 300 mg BID |
750/100 mg BID |
31 |
↓ |
0.51 (0.44, 0.60) |
0.64 (0.55, 0.75) |
- |
| 300 mg BID (43 doses) |
1250/100 mg BID
(42 doses) |
23 |
↓ |
0.49 (0.40, 0.59) |
0.69 (0.49, 0.97) |
- |
| 300 mg (1 dose) |
500/100 mg BID |
29 |
↓ |
0.39 (0.33, 0.45) |
0.57 (0.52, 0.63) |
0.89 (0.81, 0.99) |
750/200 mg BID
(23 doses) |
25 |
↔ |
0.44 (0.36, 0.54) |
0.67 (0.62, 0.73) |
1.25 (1.08, 1.44) |
| Zidovudine glucuronide |
|
500/100 mg BID |
29 |
↑ |
0.82 (0.74, 0.90) |
1.02 (0.97, 1.06) |
1.52 (1.34, 1.71) |
| |
|
750/200 mg BID
(23 doses) |
25 |
↑ |
0.82 (0.73, 0.92) |
1.09 (1.05, 1.14) |
1.94 (1.62, 2.31) |
a HIV-1 positive patients
b Buprenorphine/Naloxone maintenance patients
c HIV-1 positive patients (tipranavir/ritonavir 250 mg/200
mg, 750 mg/200 mg and 1250 mg/100 mg) and healthy volunteers (tipranavir/ritonavir
500 mg/100 mg and 750 mg/200 mg)
d Normalized sum of parent drug (rifabutin) and active metabolite
(25-O-desacetyl-rifabutin)
e Intensive PK analysis
f Drug levels obtained at 8-16 hrs post-dose
↑ increase, ↓ decrease, ↔ no change, ↨ unable to
predict |
Microbiology
Mechanism of Action
Tipranavir (TPV) is an HIV-1 protease inhibitor that inhibits the virus-specific
processing of the viral Gag and Gag-Pol polyproteins in HIV-1 infected cells,
thus preventing formation of mature virions.
Antiviral Activity
Tipranavir inhibits the replication of laboratory strains of HIV-1 and clinical
isolates in acute models of T-cell infection, with 50% effective concentrations
(EC50) ranging from 0.03 to 0.07 µM (18-42 ng/mL). Tipranavir demonstrates
antiviral activity in cell culture against a broad panel of HIV-1 group M non-clade
B isolates (A, C, D, F, G, H, CRF01 AE, CRF02 AG, CRF12 BF). Group O and HIV-2
isolates have reduced susceptibility in cell culture to tipranavir with EC50
values ranging from 0.164 -1 µM and 0.233-0.522 µM, respectively. When used
with other antiretroviral agents in cell culture, the combination of tipranavir
was additive to antagonistic with other protease inhibitors (amprenavir, atazanavir,
indinavir, lopinavir, nelfinavir, ritonavir, and saquinavir) and generally additive
with the NNRTIs (delavirdine, efavirenz, and nevirapine) and the NRTIs (abacavir,
didanosine, emtricitabine, lamivudine, stavudine, tenofovir, and zidovudine).
Tipranavir was synergistic with the HIV-1 fusion inhibitor enfuvirtide. There
was no antagonism of the cell culture combinations of tipranavir with either
adefovir or ribavirin, used in the treatment of viral hepatitis.
Resistance
In cell culture:
HIV-1 isolates with a decreased susceptibility to tipranavir have been selected
in cell culture and obtained from patients treated with APTIVUS/ritonavir (TPV/ritonavir).
After 9 months of culture in TPV-containing media, HIV-1 isolates with 87-fold
reduced susceptibility to tipranavir were selected in cell culture; these contained
10 protease substitutions that developed in the following order: L33F, I84V,
K45I, I13V, V32I, V82L, M36I, A71V, L10F, and I54V/T. Changes in the Gag polyprotein
CA/P2 cleavage site were also observed following drug selection. Experiments
with site-directed mutants of HIV-1 showed that the presence of 6 substitutions
in the protease coding sequence (I13V, V32I, L33F, K45I, V82L, I84V) conferred
> 10-fold reduced susceptibility to tipranavir.
Clinical Studies of Treatment-Experienced Patients:
In controlled clinical trials 1182.12 and 1182.48, multiple protease inhibitor-resistant HIV-1 isolates from 59 treatment-experienced adult patients who received APTIVUS/ritonavir and experienced virologic rebound developed amino acid substitutions that were associated with resistance to tipranavir. The most common amino acid substitutions that developed on 500/200 mg APTIVUS/ritonavir in greater than 20% of APTIVUS/ritonavir virologic failure isolates were L33V/I/F, V82T, and I84V. Other substitutions that developed in 10 to 20% of APTIVUS/ritonavir virologic failure isolates included L10V/I/S, I13V, E35D/G/N, I47V, I54A/M/V, K55R, V82L, and L89V/M. Evolution at protease gag polyprotein cleavage sites was also observed. Among 28 pediatric patients in clinical trial 1182.14 who experienced virologic failure or non-response, the emergent protease amino acid codon substitutions were similar to those observed in adult virologic failure isolates.
In clinical trials 1182.12 and 1182.48 tipranavir resistance was detected at virologic rebound after an average of 38 weeks of APTIVUS/ritonavir treatment with a median 14-fold decrease in tipranavir susceptibility. Similarly, reduced tipranavir susceptibility was associated with emergent mutations in pediatric patient isolates.
Cross-resistance
Cross-resistance among protease inhibitors has been observed. Tipranavir had < 4-fold decreased susceptibility against 90% (94/105) of HIV-1 clinical isolates resistant to amprenavir, atazanavir, indinavir, lopinavir, nelfinavir, ritonavir, or saquinavir. Tipranavir-resistant viruses which emerged in cell culture from wild-type HIV-1 had decreased susceptibility to the protease inhibitors amprenavir, atazanavir, indinavir, lopinavir, nelfinavir and ritonavir but remained sensitive to saquinavir.
Baseline Genotype and Virologic Outcome Analyses
Genotypic and/or phenotypic analysis of baseline virus may aid in determining tipranavir susceptibility before initiation of APTIVUS/ritonavir therapy. Several analyses were conducted to evaluate the impact of specific substitutions and combination of substitutions on virologic outcome. Both the type and number of baseline protease inhibitor substitutions as well as use of additional active agents (e.g., enfuvirtide) affected APTIVUS/ritonavir response rates in controlled clinical trials 1182.12 and 1182.48 through Week 48 of treatment.
Regression analyses of baseline and/or on-treatment HIV-1 genotypes from 860 treatment-experienced patients in Phase 2 and 3 trials demonstrated that amino acid substitutions at 16 codons in the HIV-1 protease coding sequence were associated with reduced virologic responses and/or reduced tipranavir susceptibility: L10V, I13V, K20M/R/V, L33F, E35G, M36I, K43T, M46L, I47V, I54A/M/V, Q58E, H69K, T74P, V82L/T, N83D or I84V.
As-treated analyses were also conducted to assess virologic outcome by the
number of primary protease inhibitor substitutions present at baseline. Response
rates were reduced if five or more protease inhibitor-associated substitutions
were present at baseline and subjects did not receive concomitant new enfuvirtide
with APTIVUS/ritonavir. See Table 9.
Table 9: Controlled Clinical Trials 1182.12 and 1182.48:
Proportion of Responders (confirmed ≥ 1 log10 decrease at Week
48) by Number of Baseline Primary Protease Inhibitor (PI) Resistance Associated
Substitutions
| |
APTIVUS/ritonavir
N=578 |
|
Comparator PI/ritonavir
N=610 |
| Number of Baseline Primary PI Mutationsa |
No New Enfuvirtideb |
+ New Enfuvirtidec |
No New Enfuvirtideb |
+ New Enfuvirtidec |
| Overall |
38%(180/470) |
69%(75/108) |
18%(92/524) |
26%(22/86) |
| 1 - 2 |
62%(24/39) |
60%(3/5) |
33%(14/43) |
0%(0/1) |
| 3 - 4 |
48%(96/202) |
71%(27/38) |
23%(45/193) |
38%(13/34) |
| 5+ |
26% |
69% |
11% |
18% |
a Primary PI mutations include any amino acid substitution
at positions 30, 32, 36, 46, 47, 48, 50, 53, 54, 82, 84, 88 and 90
b No new enfuvirtide is defined as recycled or continued use
of enfuvirtide or no use of enfuvirtide
c New enfuvirtide is defined as initiation of enfuvirtide for
the first time |
The median change from baseline in plasma HIV-1 RNA at weeks 2, 4, 8, 16, 24 and 48 was evaluated by the number of baseline primary protease inhibitor resistance associated substitutions (1-4 or ≥ 5) in subjects who received APTIVUS/ritonavir with or without new enfuvirtide. The following observations were made:
- Approximately 1.5 log10 decrease in HIV-1 RNA at early time points (Week
2) regardless of the number of baseline primary protease inhibitor resistance
associated substitutions (1-4 or 5+).
- Subjects with 5 or more primary protease inhibitor resistance associated
substitutions in their HIV-1 at baseline who received APTIVUS/ritonavir without
new enfuvirtide (n=303) began to lose their antiviral response after Week
4.
- Early HIV-1 RNA decreases (1.5-2 log10) were sustained through
Week 48 in subjects with 5 or more primary protease inhibitor resistance associated
substitutions at baseline who received new enfuvirtide with APTIVUS/ritonavir
(n=74).
Baseline Phenotype and Virologic Outcome Analyses
APTIVUS/ritonavir response rates were also assessed by baseline tipranavir phenotype. Relationships between baseline phenotypic susceptibility to tipranavir, mutations at protease amino acid codons 33, 82, 84 and 90, tipranavir resistance-associated mutations, and response to APTIVUS/ritonavir therapy at Week-48 are summarized in Tables 10 and 11. These baseline phenotype groups are not meant to represent clinical susceptibility breakpoints for APTIVUS/ritonavir because the data are based on the select 1182.12 and 1182.48 patient population. The data are provided to give clinicians information on the likelihood of virologic success based on pre-treatment susceptibility to APTIVUS/ritonavir in protease inhibitor-experienced patients.
Table 10: Response by Baseline Tipranavir Phenotype at 48
weeks in the Controlled Clinical Trials 1182.12 and 1182.48
| Baseline Tipranavir Phenotype (Fold Change)a |
Proportion of Respondersb with No New Enfuvirtidec
Use
N=211 |
Proportion of Respondersb with New Enfuvirtided
Use
N=68 |
Tipranavir Susceptibility |
| 0-3 |
48% (73/153) |
70% (33/47) |
Susceptible |
| > 3-10 |
21% (10/48) |
53% (8/15) |
Decreased Susceptibility |
| > 10 |
10% (1/10) |
50% (3/6) |
Resistant |
aChange in tipranavir EC50 value from wild-type
reference
bConfirmed ≥ 1 log10 decrease at Week 48
cNo new enfuvirtide is defined as recycled or continued use of
enfuvirtide or no use of enfuvirtide
dNew enfuvirtide is defined as initiation of enfuvirtide for
the first time |
Table 11: Correlation of Baseline Tipranavir Phenotype to
Genotype using HIV 1 isolates from Phase 2 and Phase 3 Clinical Trials
| Baseline Tipranavir Phenotype (Fold Change)a |
# of Baseline Protease Mutations at 33, 82, 84, 90 |
# of Baseline Tipranavir Resistance-Associated Mutationsb |
Tipranavir Susceptibilityc |
| 0-3 |
0-2 |
0-4 |
Susceptible |
| > 3-10 |
3 |
5-7 |
Decreased Susceptibility |
| > 10 |
4 |
8+ |
Resistant |
a Change in tipranavir EC50 value from wild-type
reference
b Number of amino acid substitutions in HIV-1 protease among
L10V, I13V, K20M/R/V, L33F, E35G, M36I, K43T, M46L, I47V, I54A/M/V, Q58E,
H69K, T74P, V82L/T, N83D or I84V
c defined by week 48 response |
Analyses of pediatric clinical trial 1182.14 also demonstrated that response to therapy was influenced by the number of baseline protease inhibitor mutations present.
Animal Toxicology and/or Pharmacology
In preclinical studies in rats, tipranavir treatment induced dose-dependent changes in coagulation parameters (increased prothrombin time, increased activated partial thromboplastin time, and a decrease in some vitamin K dependent factors). In some rats, these changes led to bleeding in multiple organs and death. The co-administration of vitamin E in the form of TPGS (d-alpha-tocopherol polyethylene glycol 1000 succinate) with tipranavir resulted in a significant increase in effects on coagulation parameters, bleeding events, and death.
In preclinical studies of tipranavir in dogs, an effect on coagulation parameters
was not seen. Co-administration of tipranavir and vitamin E has not been studied
in dogs. Clinical evaluation of coagulation effects on HIV-1-infected patients
demonstrated no tipranavir plus ritonavir effect and no effect of the vitamin
E-containing oral solution on coagulation parameters [see Effects on Platelet
Aggregation and Coagulation].
Clinical Studies
Adult Patients
The following clinical data is derived from analyses of 48-week data from ongoing studies measuring effects on plasma HIV-1 RNA levels and CD4+ cell counts. At present there are no results from controlled studies evaluating the effect of APTIVUS/ritonavir on clinical progression of HIV-1.
APTIVUS/ritonavir 500/200 mg BID + optimized background regimen (OBR) vs.
Comparator Protease Inhibitor/ritonavir BID + OBR
The two clinical trials 1182.12 and 1182.48 (RESIST 1 and RESIST 2) are ongoing, randomized, controlled, open-label, multicenter studies in HIV-1 positive, triple antiretroviral class experienced patients. All patients were required to have previously received at least two protease inhibitor-based antiretroviral regimens and were failing a protease inhibitor-based regimen at the time of study entry with baseline HIV-1 RNA at least 1000 copies/mL and any CD4+ cell count. At least one primary protease gene mutation from among 30N, 46I, 46L, 48V, 50V, 82A, 82F, 82L, 82T, 84V or 90M had to be present at baseline, with not more than two mutations at codons 33, 82, 84 or 90.
These studies evaluated treatment response at 48 weeks in a total of 1483 patients receiving either APTIVUS co-administered with 200 mg of ritonavir plus OBR versus a control group receiving a ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor (lopinavir, amprenavir, saquinavir or indinavir) plus OBR. Prior to randomization, OBR was individually defined for each patient based on genotypic resistance testing and patient history. The investigator had to declare OBR, comparator protease inhibitor, and use of new enfuvirtide prior to randomization. Randomization was stratified by choice of comparator protease inhibitor and use of new enfuvirtide.
After Week 8, patients in the control group who met the protocol defined criteria of initial lack of virologic response or confirmed virologic failure had the option of discontinuing treatment and switching to APTIVUS/ritonavir in a separate roll-over study.
Demographics and baseline characteristics were balanced between the APTIVUS/ritonavir
arm and control arm. In both studies combined, the 1483 patients had a median
age of 43 years (range 17-80), and were 86.3% male, 75.6% white, 12.9% black,
and 0.9% Asian. The median baseline plasma HIV-1 RNA for both treatment groups
was 4.8 (range 2.0 to 6.8) log10 copies/mL and median baseline CD4+
cell count was 162 (range 1 to 1894) cells/mm3. Overall, 38.4% of
patients had a baseline HIV-1 RNA of > 100,000 copies/mL, 58.6% had a baseline
CD4+ cell count ≤ 200 cells/mm3, and 57.8% had experienced an AIDS
defining Class C event at baseline.
Patients had prior exposure to a median of 6 NRTIs, 1 NNRTI, and 4 PIs. A total of 10.1% of patients had previously used enfuvirtide. In baseline patient samples (n=454), 97% of the HIV-1 isolates were resistant to at least one protease inhibitor, 95% of the isolates were resistant to at least one NRTI, and > 75% of the isolates were resistant to at least one NNRTI.
The individually pre-selected protease inhibitor based on genotypic testing and the patient's medical history was lopinavir in 48.7%, amprenavir in 26.4%, saquinavir in 21.8% and indinavir in 3.1% of patients. A total of 85.1% were possibly resistant or resistant to the pre-selected comparator protease inhibitors. Approximately 21% of patients used enfuvirtide during the study of which 16.6% in the APTIVUS/ritonavir arm and 13.2% in the comparator/ritonavir arm represented first time use of enfuvirtide (new enfuvirtide).
Treatment response and efficacy outcomes of randomized treatment through Week 48 of studies 1182.12 and 1182.48 are shown in Table 12.
Table 12: Outcomes of Randomized Treatment Through Week 48
(Pooled Studies 1182.12 and 1182.48)
| Outcome |
APTIVUS/ritonavir (500/200 mg BID)+ OBR
(N=746) |
Comparator Protease Inhibitor*/ritonavir + OBR
(N=737) |
| Virologic Respondersa (confirmed at least 1 log10
HIV-1 RNA below baseline) |
33.8% |
|
14.9% |
|
| Virologic failures |
55.1% |
|
77.3% |
|
| Initial lack of virologic response by Week 8b |
|
33.0% |
|
57.9% |
| Rebound |
|
18.9% |
|
16.4% |
| Never suppressed |
|
3.2% |
|
3.0% |
| Deathc or discontinued due to adverse events |
5.9% |
|
|
|
| Death |
|
0.5% |
|
0.3% |
| Discontinued due to adverse events |
|
5.4% |
|
1.6% |
| Discontinued due to other reasonsd |
5.2% |
|
5.8% |
|
*Comparator protease inhibitors were lopinavir, amprenavir,
saquinavir or indinavir and 85.1% of patients were possibly resistant or
resistant to the chosen protease inhibitors.
aPatients achieved and maintained a confirmed ≥ 1 log10
HIV-1 RNA drop from baseline through Week 48 without prior evidence of treatment
failure.
bPatients did not achieve a 0.5 log10 HIV-1 RNA drop
from baseline and did not have viral load < 100,000 copies/mL by Week
8.
cDeath only counted if it was the reason for treatment failure.
dIncludes patients who were lost to-follow-up, withdrawn consent,
non-adherent, protocol violations, added/changed background antiretroviral
drugs for reasons other than tolerability or toxicity, or discontinued while
suppressed. |
Through 48 weeks of treatment, the proportion of patients in the APTIVUS/ritonavir
arm compared to the comparator PI/ritonavir arm with HIV-1 RNA < 400 copies/mL
was 30.3% and 13.6% respectively, and with HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL was 22.7%
and 10.2% respectively. Among all randomized and treated patients, the median
change from baseline in HIV-1 RNA at the last measurement up to Week 48 was
-0.64 log10 copies/mL in patients receiving APTIVUS/ritonavir versus
-0.22 log10 copies/mL in the comparator PI/ritonavir arm.
Among all randomized and treated patients, the median change from baseline
in CD4+ cell count at the last measurement up to Week 48 was +23 cells/mm3
in patients receiving APTIVUS/ritonavir (N=740) versus +4 cells/mm3
in the comparator PI/ritonavir (N=727) arm.
Patients in the APTIVUS/ritonavir arm achieved a significantly better virologic
outcome when APTIVUS/ritonavir was combined with enfuvirtide. Among patients
with new enfuvirtide use, the proportion of patients in the APTIVUS/ritonavir
arm compared to the comparator PI/ritonavir arm with HIV-1 RNA < 400 copies/mL
was 52.4% and 19.6% respectively, and with HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL was 37.3%
and 14.4% respectively. The median change from baseline in CD4+ cell count at
the last measurement up to Week 48 was +89 cells/mm3 in patients
receiving APTIVUS/ritonavir in combination with newly introduced enfuvirtide
(N=124) and +18 cells/mm3 in the comparator PI/ritonavir (N=96) arm.
Pediatric Patients
The pharmacokinetic profile, safety and activity of APTIVUS/ritonavir was evaluated
in a randomized, open-label, multicenter study. This study enrolled HIV-1 infected,
treatment-experienced pediatric patients (with the exception of 3 treatment-naïve
patients), with baseline HIV-1 RNA of at least 1500 copies/mL. The age ranged
from 2 through 18 years and patients were stratified by age (2 to < 6 years,
6 to < 12 years and 12 to 18 years). One hundred and ten (110) patients were
randomized to receive one of two APTIVUS/ritonavir dose regimens: 375 mg/m2/150
mg/m2 dose (N=55) or 290 mg/m2/115 mg/m2 dose
(N=55), plus background therapy of at least two non-protease inhibitor antiretroviral
drugs, optimized using baseline genotypic resistance testing. All patients initially
received APTIVUS oral solution. Pediatric patients who were 12 years or older
and received the maximum dose of 500/200 mg BID could subsequently change to
APTIVUS capsules at day 28 [see ADVERSE REACTIONS,
Use in Specific Populations, CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY,
and Microbiology].
Demographics and baseline characteristics were balanced between the APTIVUS/ritonavir
dose groups. The 110 randomized pediatric patients had a median age of 11.7
years (range 2 to 18), and were 57.2% male, 68.1% white, 30% black, and 1.8%
Asian. The median baseline plasma HIV-1 RNA was 4.7 (range 3.0 to 6.8) log10
copies/mL and median baseline CD4+ cell count was 379 (range 2 to 2578) cells/mm3.
Overall, 37.4% of patients had a baseline HIV-1 RNA of > 100,000 copies/mL;
28.7% had a baseline CD4+ cell count ≤ 200 cells/mm3, and 48% had
experienced a prior AIDS defining Class C event at baseline. Patients had prior
exposure to a median of 4 NRTIs, 1 NNRTI, and 2 PIs.
Eighty three (75%) completed the 48 week period while 25% discontinued prematurely. Of the patients who discontinued prematurely, 9 (8%) discontinued due to virologic failure, and 9 (8%) discontinued due to adverse reactions.
At 48 weeks, 40% of patients had viral load < 400 copies/mL. The proportion of patients with viral load < 400 copies/mL tended to be greater (70%) in the youngest group of patients, who had less baseline viral resistance, compared to the older groups (37% and 31%). The HIV-1 RNA results are presented in Table 13.
Table 13: Proportion of Patients with HIV-1 RNA < 400 copies/mL
( < 50 copies/mL) by age and dose*
| APTIVUS/ritonavir Dose Regimen |
2 to < 6 years
(N=20) |
6 to < 12 years
(N=38) |
12 to 18 years
(N=52) |
| 375 mg/m2/150 mg/m2 |
n=10 70% (42%) |
n=19 50% (39%) |
n=26 33% (30%) |
| 290 mg/m2/115 mg/m2 |
n=10 70% (54%) |
n=19 37% (32%) |
n=26 31% (23%) |
| * The number of baseline tipranavir resistance-associated
substitutions were fewer in the 2 to < 6 year old patients than the 6
to 18 year old patients enrolled in study 1182.14 |
The dose selection for all age groups was based on the following:
- A greater proportion of patients receiving APTIVUS/ritonavir 375 mg/m2/150
mg/m2 compared to 290 mg/m2/1 15 mg/m2 achieved
HIV-1 RNA < 400 and < 50 copies/mL.
- A greater proportion of patients 6 to 18 years of age with multiple baseline
protease inhibitor resistance-associated substitutions receiving APTIVUS/ritonavir
375 mg/m2/150 mg/m2 achieved HIV-1 RNA < 400 copies/mL
at 48 weeks compared to patients receiving APTIVUS/ritonavir 290 mg/m2/115
mg/m2.
- No clinically significant increase in adverse event rates observed with
375 mg/m2/150 mg/m2 compared to 290 mg/m2/115
mg/m2.
- Overall, 6 (5%) patients ages 6 to 18 had AIDS defining illness during
the treatment period and all received the 290 mg/m2/115 mg/m2
dose.
The guidance for possible dose reduction for patients who develop intolerance
or toxicity and cannot continue with APTIVUS/ritonavir 14 mg/kg/6 mg/kg (or
375 mg/m2/150 mg/m2) is based on the following:
- The 290 mg/m2/115 mg/m2 twice daily regimen provided
tipranavir plasma concentrations similar to those obtained in adults receiving
500/200 mg twice daily. The 375 mg/m2/150 mg/m2 twice
daily regimen provided tipranavir plasma concentrations 37% higher than those
obtained in adults receiving 500/200 mg twice daily.
- The observed response rates for APTIVUS/ritonavir dose of 290 mg/m2/1
15 mg/m2 as shown in Table 13.
Dose reduction is not appropriate for patients whose virus is resistant to more than one protease inhibitor.
When body surface area (BSA) dosing is converted to mg/kg dosing, the APTIVUS/ritonavir
375 mg/m2/150 mg/m2 twice daily regimen is similar to
14 mg/kg/6 mg/kg and APTIVUS/ritonavir 290 mg/m2/115 mg/m2
twice daily regimen is similar to 12 mg/kg/5 mg/kg twice daily [see DOSAGE
AND ADMINISTRATION].
Last updated on RxList: 7/13/2009