Mechanism of Action
Breast cancer cell growth may be estrogen-dependent. Aromatase is the principal
enzyme that converts androgens to estrogens both in pre- and postmenopausal
women. While the main source of estrogen (primarily estradiol) is the ovary
in premenopausal women, the principal source of circulating estrogens in postmenopausal
women is from conversion of adrenal and ovarian androgens (androstenedione and
testosterone) to estrogens (estrone and estradiol) by the aromatase enzyme in
peripheral tissues. Estrogen deprivation through aromatase inhibition is an
effective and selective treatment for some postmenopausal patients with hormone-dependent
breast cancer.
Exemestane is an irreversible, steroidal aromatase inactivator, structurally
related to the natural substrate androstenedione. It acts as a false substrate
for the aromatase enzyme, and is processed to an intermediate that binds irreversibly
to the active site of the enzyme causing its inactivation, an effect also known
as “suicide inhibition.” Exemestane significantly lowers circulating
estrogen concentrations in postmenopausal women, but has no detectable effect
on adrenal biosynthesis of corticosteroids or aldosterone. Exemestane has no
effect on other enzymes involved in the steroidogenic pathway up to a concentration
at least 600 times higher than that inhibiting the aromatase enzyme.
Pharmacokinetics
Following oral administration to healthy postmenopausal women, exemestane is
rapidly absorbed. After maximum plasma concentration is reached, levels decline
polyexponentially with a mean terminal half-life of about 24 hours. Exemestane
is extensively distributed and is cleared from the systemic circulation primarily
by metabolism. The pharmacokinetics of exemestane are dose proportional after
single (10 to 200 mg) or repeated oral doses (0.5 to 50 mg). Following repeated
daily doses of exemestane 25 mg, plasma concentrations of unchanged drug are
similar to levels measured after a single dose.
Pharmacokinetic parameters in postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer
following single or repeated doses have been compared with those in healthy,
postmenopausal women. Exemestane appeared to be more rapidly absorbed in the
women with breast cancer than in the healthy women, with a mean tmax of 1.2
hours in the women with breast cancer and 2.9 hours in the healthy women. After
repeated dosing, the average oral clearance in women with advanced breast cancer
was 45% lower than the oral clearance in healthy postmenopausal women, with
corresponding higher systemic exposure. Mean AUC values following repeated doses
in women with breast cancer (75.4 ng•h/mL) were about twice those in healthy
women (41.4 ng•h/mL).
Absorption
Following oral administration of radiolabeled exemestane, at least 42% of radioactivity
was absorbed from the gastrointestinal tract. Exemestane plasma levels increased
by approximately 40% after a high-fat breakfast.
Distribution
Exemestane is distributed extensively into tissues. Exemestane is 90% bound
to plasma proteins and the fraction bound is independent of the total concentration.
Albumin and α1-acid glycoprotein both contribute to the binding. The distribution
of exemestane and its metabolites into blood cells is negligible.
Metabolism and Excretion
Following administration of radiolabeled exemestane to healthy postmenopausal
women, the cumulative amounts of radioactivity excreted in urine and feces were
similar (42 ± 3% in urine and 42 ± 6% in feces over a 1-week collection
period). The amount of drug excreted unchanged in urine was less than 1% of
the dose. Exemestane is extensively metabolized, with levels of the unchanged
drug in plasma accounting for less than 10% of the total radioactivity. The
initial steps in the metabolism of exemestane are oxidation of the methylene
group in position 6 and reduction of the 17-keto group with subsequent formation
of many secondary metabolites. Each metabolite accounts only for a limited amount
of drug-related material. The metabolites are inactive or inhibit aromatase
with decreased potency compared with the parent drug. One metabolite may have
androgenic activity (see Pharmacodynamics, Other Endocrine Effects).
Studies using human liver preparations indicate that cytochrome P-450 3A4 (CYP
3A4) is the principal isoenzyme involved in the oxidation of exemestane.
Special Populations
Geriatric
Healthy postmenopausal women aged 43 to 68 years were studied in the pharmacokinetic
trials. Age-related alterations in exemestane pharmacokinetics were not seen
over this age range.
Gender
The pharmacokinetics of exemestane following administration of a single, 25-mg
tablet to fasted healthy males (mean age 32 years) were similar to the pharmacokinetics
of exemestane in fasted healthy postmenopausal women (mean age 55 years).
Race
The influence of race on exemestane pharmacokinetics has not been evaluated.
Hepatic Insufficiency
The pharmacokinetics of exemestane have been investigated in subjects with
moderate or severe hepatic insufficiency (Childs-Pugh B or C). Following a single
25-mg oral dose, the AUC of exemestane was approximately 3 times higher than
that observed in healthy volunteers (see PRECAUTIONS).
Renal Insufficiency
The AUC of exemestane after a single 25-mg dose was approximately 3 times higher
in subjects with moderate or severe renal insufficiency (creatinine clearance
< 35 mL/min/1.73 m²) compared with the AUC in healthy volunteers (see
PRECAUTIONS).
Pediatric
The pharmacokinetics of exemestane have not been studied in pediatric patients.
Drug-Drug Interactions
Exemestane is metabolized by cytochrome P-450 3A4 (CYP 3A4) and aldoketoreductases.
It does not inhibit any of the major CYP isoenzymes, including CYP 1A2, 2C9,
2D6, 2E1, and 3A4. In a clinical pharmacokinetic study, ketoconazole showed
no significant influence on the pharmacokinetics of exemestane. Although no
other formal drug-drug interaction studies have been conducted, significant
effects on exemestane clearance by CYP isoenzymes inhibitors appear unlikely.
In a pharmacokinetic interaction study of 10 healthy postmenopausal volunteers
pretreated with potent CYP 3A4 inducer rifampicin 600 mg daily for 14 days followed
by a single dose of exemestane 25 mg, the mean plasma Cmax and AUC 0– ∞
of exemestane were decreased by 41% and 54%, respectively (see PRECAUTIONS
and DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION).
Pharmacodynamics
Effect on Estrogens
Multiple doses of exemestane ranging from 0.5 to 600 mg/day were administered
to postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer. Plasma estrogen (estradiol,
estrone, and estrone sulfate) suppression was seen starting at a 5-mg daily
dose of exemestane, with a maximum suppression of at least 85% to 95% achieved
at a 25-mg dose. Exemestane 25 mg daily reduced whole body aromatization (as
measured by injecting radiolabeled androstenedione) by 98% in postmenopausal
women with breast cancer. After a single dose of exemestane 25 mg, the maximal
suppression of circulating estrogens occurred 2 to 3 days after dosing and persisted
for 4 to 5 days.
Effect on Corticosteroids
In multiple-dose trials of doses up to 200 mg daily, exemestane selectivity
was assessed by examining its effect on adrenal steroids. Exemestane did not
affect cortisol or aldosterone secretion at baseline or in response to ACTH
at any dose. Thus, no glucocorticoid or mineralocorticoid replacement therapy
is necessary with exemestane treatment.
Other Endocrine Effects
Exemestane does not bind significantly to steroidal receptors, except for a
slight affinity for the androgen receptor (0.28% relative to dihydrotestosterone).
The binding affinity of its 17-dihydrometabolite for the androgen receptor,
however, is 100-times that of the parent compound. Daily doses of exemestane
up to 25 mg had no significant effect on circulating levels of androstenedione,
dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate, or 17-hydroxyprogesterone, and were associated
with small decreases in circulating levels of testosterone. Increases in testosterone
and androstenedione levels have been observed at daily doses of 200 mg or more.
A dose-dependent decrease in sex hormone binding globulin (SHBG) has been observed
with daily exemestane doses of 2.5 mg or higher. Slight, nondose-dependent increases
in serum luteinizing hormone (LH) and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) levels
have been observed even at low doses as a consequence of feedback at the pituitary
level. Exemestane 25 mg daily had no significant effect on thyroid function
[free triiodothyronine (FT3), free thyroxine (FT4) and thyroid stimulating hormone
(TSH)].
Coagulation and Lipid Effects
In study 027 of postmenopausal women with early breast cancer treated with
exemestane (N=73) or placebo (N=73), there was no change in the coagulation
parameters activated partial thromboplastin time [APTT], prothrombin time [PT]
and fibrinogen. Plasma HDL cholesterol was decreased 6–9% in exemestane treated
patients; total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, triglycerides, apolipoprotein-A1,
apolipoprotein-B, and lipoprotein-a were unchanged. An 18% increase in homocysteine
levels was also observed in exemestane treated patients compared with a 12%
increase seen with placebo.
Clinical Studies
Adjuvant Treatment in Early Breast Cancer
The Intergroup Exemestane Study 031 (IES) was a randomized, double-blind, multicenter,
multinational study comparing exemestane (25 mg/day) versus tamoxifen (20 or
30 mg/day) in postmenopausal women with early breast cancer. Patients who remained
disease-free after receiving adjuvant tamoxifen therapy for 2 to 3 years were
randomized to receive 3 to 2 years of AROMASIN or tamoxifen to complete a total
of 5 years of hormonal therapy.
The primary objective of the study was to determine whether, in terms of disease-free
survival, it was more effective to switch to AROMASIN rather than continuing
tamoxifen therapy for the remainder of five years. Disease-free survival was
defined as the time from randomization to time of local or distant recurrence
of breast cancer, contralateral invasive breast cancer, or death from any cause.
The secondary objectives were to compare the two regimens in terms of overall
survival and long-term tolerability. Time to contralateral invasive breast cancer
and distant recurrence-free survival were also evaluated.
A total of 4724 patients in the intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis were randomized
to AROMASIN (exemestane tablets) 25 mg once daily (N = 2352) or to continue
to receive tamoxifen once daily at the same dose received before randomization
(N = 2372). Demographics and baseline tumor characteristics are presented in
Table 1. Prior breast cancer therapy is summarized in Table 2.
Table 1. Demographic and Baseline Tumor Characteristics from
the IES Study of Postmenopausal Women with Early Breast Cancer (ITT Population)
| Parameter |
Exemestane
(N = 2352) |
Tamoxifen
(N = 2372) |
| Age (years): |
| Median age (range) |
63.0 (38.0 – 96.0) |
63.0 (31.0 – 90.0) |
| Race, n (%): |
| Caucasian |
2315 (98.4) |
2333 (98.4) |
| Hispanic |
13 (0.6) |
13 (0.5) |
| Asian |
10 (0.4) |
9 (0.4) |
| Black |
7 (0.3) |
10 (0.4) |
| Other/not reported |
7 (0.3) |
7 (0.3) |
| Nodal status, n (%): |
| Negative |
1217 (51.7) |
1228 (51.8) |
| Positive |
1051 (44.7) |
1044 (44.0) |
| 1–3 Positive nodes |
721 (30.7) |
708 (29.8) |
| 4–9 Positive nodes |
239 (10.2) |
244 (10.3) |
| > 9 Positive nodes |
88 (3.7) |
86 (3.6) |
| Not reported |
3 (0.1) |
6 (0.3) |
| Unknown or missing |
84 (3.6) |
100 (4.2) |
| Histologic type, n (%): |
| Infiltrating ductal |
1777 (75.6) |
1830 (77.2) |
| Infiltrating lobular |
341 (14.5) |
321 (13.5) |
| Other |
231 (9.8) |
213 (9.0) |
| Unknown or missing |
3 (0.1) |
8 (0.3) |
| Receptor status*, n (%): |
| ER and PgR Positive |
1331 (56.6) |
1319 (55.6) |
| ER Positive and PgR Negative/Unknown |
677 (28.8) |
692 (29.2) |
| ER Unknown and PgR Positive**/Unknown |
288 (12.2) |
291 (12.3) |
| ER Negative and PgR Positive |
6 (0.3) |
7 (0.3) |
| ER Negative and PgR Negative/Unknown (none positive) |
48 (2.0) |
58 (2.4) |
| Missing |
2 (0.1) |
5 (0.2) |
| Tumor Size, n (%): |
| ≤ 0.5 cm |
58 (2.5) |
46 (1.9) |
| > 0.5 – 1.0 cm |
315 (13.4) |
302 (12.7) |
| > 1.0 – 2 cm |
1031 (43.8) |
1033 (43.5) |
| > 2.0 – 5.0 cm |
833 (35.4) |
883 (37.2) |
| > 5.0 cm |
62 (2.6) |
59 (2.5) |
| Not reported |
53 (2.3) |
49 (2.1) |
| Tumor Grade, n (%): |
| G1 |
397 (16.9) |
393 (16.6) |
| G2 |
977 (41.5) |
1007 (42.5) |
| G3 |
454 (19.3) |
428 (18.0) |
| G4 |
23 (1.0) |
19 (0.8) |
| Unknown/Not Assessed/Not reported |
501 (21.3) |
525 (22.1) |
* Results for receptor status include
the results of the post-randomization testing of specimens from subjects
for whom receptor status was unknown at randomization.
**Only one subject in the exemestane group had unknown ER status and positive
PgR status. |
Table 2. Prior Breast Cancer Therapy of Patients in the IES
Study of Postmenopausal Women with Early Breast Cancer (ITT Population)
| Parameter |
Exemestane
(N = 2352) |
Tamoxifen
(N = 2372) |
| Type of surgery, n (%): |
| Mastectomy |
1232 (52.4) |
1242 (52.4) |
| Breast-conserving |
1116 (47.4) |
1123 (47.3) |
| Unknown or missing |
4 (0.2) |
7 (0.3) |
| Radiotherapy to the breast, n (%): |
| Yes |
1524 (64.8) |
1523 (64.2) |
| No |
824 (35.5) |
843 (35.5) |
| Not reported |
4 (0.2) |
6 (0.3) |
| Prior therapy, n (%): |
| Chemotherapy |
774 (32.9) |
769 (32.4) |
| Hormone replacement therapy |
567 (24.1) |
561 (23.7) |
| Bisphosphonates |
43 (1.8) |
34 (1.4) |
| Duration of tamoxifen therapy at randomization (months): |
| Median (range) |
28.5 (15.8 – 52.2) |
28.4 (15.6 – 63.0) |
| Tamoxifen dose, n (%): |
| 20 mg |
2270 (96.5) |
2287 (96.4) |
| 30 mg* |
78 (3.3) |
75 (3.2) |
| Not reported |
4 (0.2) |
10 (0.4) |
| *The 30 mg dose was used only in Denmark,
where this dose was the standard of care. |
After a median duration of therapy of 27 months and with a median follow-up
of 34.5 months, 520 events were reported, 213 in the AROMASIN group and 307
in the tamoxifen group (Table 3).
Table 3. Primary Endpoint Events (ITT Population)
| Event |
First Events N (%) |
Exemestane
(N = 2352) |
Tamoxifen
(N = 2372) |
| Loco-regional recurrence |
34 (1.45) |
45 (1.90) |
| Distant recurrence |
126 (5.36) |
183 (7.72) |
| Second primary – contralateral breast cancer |
7 (0.30) |
25 (1.05) |
| Death – breast cancer |
1 (0.04) |
6 (0.25) |
| Death – other reason |
41 (1.74) |
43 (1.81) |
| Death – missing/unknown |
3 (0.13) |
5 (0.21) |
| Ipsilateral breast cancer |
1 (0.04) |
0 |
| Total number of events |
213 (9.06) |
307 (12.94) |
Disease-free survival in the intent-to-treat population was statistically significantly
improved [Hazard Ratio (HR) = 0.69, 95% CI: 0.58, 0.82, P = 0.00003, Table 4,
Figure 1] in the AROMASIN arm compared to the tamoxifen arm. In the hormone
receptor-positive subpopulation representing about 85% of the trial patients,
disease-free survival was also statistically significantly improved (HR = 0.65,
95% CI: 0.53, 0.79, P = 0.00001) in the AROMASIN arm compared to the tamoxifen
arm. Consistent results were observed in the subgroups of patients with node
negative or positive disease, and patients who had or had not received prior
chemotherapy. Overall survival was not significantly different in the two groups,
with 116 deaths occurring in the AROMASIN group and 137 in the tamoxifen group.
Table 4. Efficacy Results from the IES Study in Postmenopausal
Women with Early Breast Cancer
| ITT Population |
Hazard Ratio
(95% CI) |
p-value
(log-rank test) |
| Disease free survival |
0.69 (0.58–0.82) |
0.00003 |
| Time to contralateral breast cancer |
0.32 (0.15–0.72) |
0.00340 |
| Distant recurrence free survival |
0.74 (0.62–0.90) |
0.00207 |
| Overall survival |
0.86 (0.67–1.10) |
0.22962 |
| ER and/or PgR positive |
| Disease free survival |
0.65 (0.53–0.79) |
0.00001 |
| Time to contralateral breast cancer |
0.22 (0.08–0.57) |
0.00069 |
| Distant recurrence free survival |
0.73 (0.59–0.90) |
0.00367 |
| Overall survival |
0.88 (0.67–1.17) |
0.37460 |
Figure 1. Disease Free Survival in the IES Study of Postmenopausal
Women with Early Breast Cancer (ITT Population)
Treatment of A dvanced Breast Cancer
Exemestane 25 mg administered once daily was evaluated in a randomized double-blind,
multicenter, multinational comparative study and in two multicenter single-arm
studies of postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer who had disease
progression after treatment with tamoxifen for metastatic disease or as adjuvant
therapy. Some patients also have received prior cytotoxic therapy, either as
adjuvant treatment or for metastatic disease.
The primary purpose of the three studies was evaluation of objective response
rate (complete response [CR] and partial response [PR]). Time to tumor progression
and overall survival were also assessed in the comparative trial. Response rates
were assessed based on World Health Organization (WHO) criteria, and in the
comparative study, were submitted to an external review committee that was blinded
to patient treatment. In the comparative study, 769 patients were randomized
to receive AROMASIN (exemestane tablets) 25 mg once daily (N = 366) or megestrol
acetate 40 mg four times daily (N = 403). Demographics and baseline characteristics
are presented in Table 5.
Table 5. Demographics and Baseline Characteristics from the
Comparative Study of Postmenopausal Women with Advanced Breast Cancer Whose
Disease Had Progressed after Tamoxifen Therapy
| Parameter |
AROMASIN
(N = 366) |
Megestrol Acetate
(N = 403) |
| Median Age (range) |
65 (35–89) |
65 (30–91) |
| ECOG Performance Status |
| 0 |
167 (46%) |
187 (46%) |
| 1 |
162 (44%) |
172 (43%) |
| 2 |
34 (9%) |
42 (10%) |
| Receptor Status |
| ER and/or PgR + |
246 (67%) |
274 (68%) |
| ER and PgR unknown |
116 (32%) |
128 (32%) |
| Responders to prior tamoxifen |
68 (19%) |
85 (21%) |
| NE for response to prior tamoxifen |
46 (13%) |
41 (10%) |
| Site of Metastasis |
| Visceral ± other sites |
207 (57%) |
239 (59%) |
| Bone only |
61 (17%) |
73 (18%) |
| Soft tissue only |
54 (15%) |
51 (13%) |
| Bone & soft tissue |
43 (12%) |
38 (9%) |
| Measurable Disease |
287 (78%) |
314 (78%) |
| Prior Tamoxifen Therapy |
|
|
| Adjuvant or Neoadjuvant |
145 (40%) |
152 (38%) |
| Advanced Disease, Outcome |
| CR, PR or SD ≥ 6 months |
179 (49%) |
210 (52%) |
| SD < 6 months, PD or NE |
42 (12%) |
41 (10%) |
| Prior Chemotherapy |
| For advanced disease ± adjuvant |
58 (16%) |
67 (17%) |
| Adjuvant only |
104 (28%) |
108 (27%) |
| No chemotherapy |
203 (56%) |
226 (56%) |
The efficacy results from the comparative study are shown in Table 6. The objective
response rates observed in the two treatment arms showed that AROMASIN was not
different from megestrol acetate. Response rates for AROMASIN from the two single-arm
trials were 23.4% and 28.1%.
Table 6. Efficacy Results from the Comparative Study of Postmenopausal
Women with Advanced Breast Cancer Whose Disease Had Progressed after Tamoxifen
Therapy
| Response Characteristics |
AROMASIN
(N=366) |
Megestrol Acetate
(N=403) |
| Objective Response Rate = CR + PR (%) |
15.0 |
12.4 |
| Difference in Response Rate (AR-MA) |
2.6 |
| 95% C. I. |
7.5, -2.3 |
| CR (%) |
2.2 |
1.2 |
| PR (%) |
12.8 |
11.2 |
| SD ≥ 24 Weeks (%) |
21.3 |
21.1 |
| Median Duration of Response (weeks) |
76.1 |
71.0 |
| Median TTP (weeks) |
20.3 |
16.6 |
| Hazard Ratio (AR-MA) |
0.84 |
| Abbreviations: CR = complete response, PR
= partial response, SD = stable disease (no change), TTP = time to tumor
progression, C.I. = confidence interval, MA = megestrol acetate, AR =
AROMASIN |
There were too few deaths occurring across treatment groups to draw conclusions
on overall survival differences. The Kaplan-Meier curve for time to tumor progression
in the comparative study is shown in Figure 2.
Figure 2. Time to Tumor Progression in the Comparative Study
of Postmenopausal Women With Advanced Breast Cancer Whose Disease Had Progressed
After Tamoxifen Therapy
Last updated on RxList: 2/26/2009