For additional information on Mechanism of Action, Antiviral Activity, Resistance and Cross Resistance, please consult the SUSTIVA, EMTRIVA and VIREAD prescribing information.
Mechanism of Action
ATRIPLA is a fixed-dose combination of antiviral drugs efavirenz, emtricitabine
and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate. [See CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY].
Pharmacokinetics
ATRIPLA: One ATRIPLA tablet is bioequivalent to one SUSTIVA tablet
(600 mg) plus one EMTRIVA capsule (200 mg) plus one VIREAD tablet (300 mg) following
single-dose administration to fasting healthy subjects (N=45).
Efavirenz: In HIV-1 infected patients time-to-peak plasma concentrations
were approximately 3-5 hours and steady-state plasma concentrations were reached
in 6-10 days. In 35 patients receiving efavirenz 600 mg once daily, steady-state
Cmax was 12.9 ± 3.7 µM (mean ± SD), Cmin was 5.6 ±
3.2 uM, and AUC was 184 ± 73 µM·hr. Efavirenz is highly bound (approximately
99.5-99.75%) to human plasma proteins, predominantly albumin. Following administration
of 14C-labeled efavirenz, 14-34% of the dose was recovered in the
urine (mostly as metabolites) and 16-61% was recovered in feces (mostly as parent
drug). In vitro studies suggest CYP3A and CYP2B6 are the major isozymes
responsible for efavirenz metabolism. Efavirenz has been shown to induce P450
enzymes, resulting in induction of its own metabolism. Efavirenz has a terminal
half-life of 52-76 hours after single doses and 40-55 hours after multiple doses.
Emtricitabine: Following oral administration, emtricitabine is
rapidly absorbed with peak plasma concentrations occurring at 1-2 hours post-dose.
Following multiple dose oral administration of emtricitabine to 20 HIV-1-infected
subjects, the steady-state plasma emtricitabine Cmax was 1.8 ± 0.7 µg/mL
(mean ± SD) and the AUC over a 24-hour dosing interval was 10.0 ±
3.1 µg•hr/mL. The mean steady state plasma trough concentration at
24 hours post-dose was 0.09 µg/mL. The mean absolute bioavailability of
emtricitabine was 93%. In vitro binding of emtricitabine to human plasma
proteins is < 4% and is independent of concentration over the range of 0.02-200
µg/mL. Following administration of radiolabeled emtricitabine, approximately
86% is recovered in the urine and 13% is recovered as metabolites. The metabolites
of emtricitabine include 3'-sulfoxide diastereomers and their glucuronic acid
conjugate. Emtricitabine is eliminated by a combination of glomerular filtration
and active tubular secretion with a renal clearance in adults with normal renal
function of 213 ± 89 mL/min (mean ± SD). Following a single oral
dose, the plasma emtricitabine half-life is approximately 10 hours.
Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate: Following oral administration
of a single 300 mg dose of tenofovir DF to HIV-1 infected patients in the fasted
state, maximum serum concentrations (Cmax) were achieved in 1.0 ± 0.4
hrs (mean ± SD) and Cmax and AUC values were 296 ± 90 ng/mL and
2287 ± 685 ng•hr/mL, respectively. The oral bioavailability of tenofovir
from tenofovir DF in fasted patients is approximately 25%. In vitro binding
of tenofovir to human plasma proteins is < 0.7% and is independent of concentration
over the range of 0.01-25 ug/mL Approximately 70-80% of the intravenous dose
of tenofovir is recovered as unchanged drug in the urine. Tenofovir is eliminated
by a combination of glomerular filtration and active tubular secretion with
a renal clearance in adults with normal renal function of 243 ± 33 mL/min
(mean ± SD). Following a single oral dose, the terminal elimination half-life
of tenofovir is approximately 17 hours.
Effects of Food on Oral Absorption
ATRIPLA has not been evaluated in the presence of food. Administration of efavirenz
tablets with a high fat meal increased the mean AUC and Cmax of efavirenz by
28% and 79%, respectively, compared to administration in the fasted state. Compared
to fasted administration, dosing of tenofovir DF and emtricitabine in combination
with either a high fat meal or a light meal increased the mean AUC and Cmax
of tenofovir by 35% and 15%, respectively, without affecting emtricitabine exposures
[See DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION and Patient
Counseling Information].
Special Populations
Race
Efavirenz: The pharmacokinetics of efavirenz in patients appear
to be similar among the racial groups studied.
Emtricitabine: No pharmacokinetic differences due to race have
been identified following the administration of emtricitabine.
Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate: There were insufficient numbers
from racial and ethnic groups other than Caucasian to adequately determine potential
pharmacokinetic differences among these populations following the administration
of tenofovir DF.
Gender
Efavirenz, Emtricitabine, and Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate:
Efavirenz, emtricitabine, and tenofovir pharmacokinetics are similar in male
and female patients.
Pediatric and Geriatric Patients
Pharmacokinetic studies of tenofovir DF have not been performed in pediatric
patients ( < 18 years). Efavirenz has not been studied in pediatric patients
below 3 years of age or who weigh less than 13 kg. Emtricitabine has been studied
in pediatric patients from 3 months to 17 years of age. ATRIPLA is not recommended
for pediatric administration. Pharmacokinetics of efavirenz, emtricitabine and
tenofovir have not been fully evaluated in the elderly ( > 65 years) [See
Use in Specific Populations].
Patients with Impaired Renal Function
Efavirenz: The pharmacokinetics of efavirenz have not been studied
in patients with renal insufficiency; however, less than 1% of efavirenz is
excreted unchanged in the urine, so the impact of renal impairment on efavirenz
elimination should be minimal.
Emtricitabine and Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate: The pharmacokinetics
of emtricitabine and tenofovir DF are altered in patients with renal impairment.
In patients with creatinine clearance < 50 mL/min, Cmax and AUC0-∞
of emtricitabine and tenofovir were increased [See WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS].
Patients with Hepatic Impairment
Efavirenz: The pharmacokinetics of efavirenz have not been adequately
studied in patients with hepatic impairment [See WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS
and Use in Specific Populations].
Emtricitabine: The pharmacokinetics of emtricitabine have not
been studied in patients with hepatic impairment; however, emtricitabine is
not significantly metabolized by liver enzymes, so the impact of liver impairment
should be limited.
Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate: The pharmacokinetics of tenofovir
following a 300 mg dose of tenofovir DF have been studied in non-HIV infected
patients with moderate to severe hepatic impairment. There were no substantial
alterations in tenofovir pharmacokinetics in patients with hepatic impairment
compared with unimpaired patients.
Assessment of Drug Interactions
The drug interaction studies described were conducted with efavirenz, emtricitabine, or tenofovir DF as individual agents; no drug interaction studies have been conducted using ATRIPLA.
Efavirenz: The steady-state pharmacokinetics of efavirenz and
tenofovir were unaffected when efavirenz and tenofovir DF were administered
together versus each agent dosed alone. Specific drug interaction studies have
not been performed with efavirenz and NRTIs other than tenofovir, lamivudine,
and zidovudine. Clinically significant interactions would not be expected based
on NRTIs elimination pathways.
Efavirenz has been shown in vivo to cause hepatic enzyme induction,
thus increasing the biotransformation of some drugs metabolized by CYP3A. In
vitro studies have shown that efavirenz inhibited P450 isozymes 2C9, 2C19,
and 3A4 with Ki values (8.5-17 µM) in the range of observed efavirenz plasma
concentrations. In in vitro studies, efavirenz did not inhibit CYP2E1
and inhibited CYP2D6 and CYP1A2 (Ki values 82–160 µM) only
at concentrations well above those achieved clinically. Coadministration of
efavirenz with drugs primarily metabolized by 2C9, 2C19, and 3A4 isozymes may
result in altered plasma concentrations of the coadministered drug. Drugs which
induce CYP3A activity would be expected to increase the clearance of efavirenz
resulting in lowered plasma concentrations.
Drug interaction studies were performed with efavirenz and other drugs likely
to be coadministered or drugs commonly used as probes for pharmacokinetic interaction.
There was no clinically significant interaction observed between efavirenz and
zidovudine, lamivudine, azithromycin, fluconazole, lorazepam, cetirizine, or
paroxetine. Single doses of famotidine or an aluminum and magnesium antacid
with simethicone had no effects on efavirenz exposures. The effects of coadministration
of efavirenz on Cmax, AUC, and Cmin are summarized in Table 5 (effect of other
drugs on efavirenz) and Table 6 (effect of efavirenz on other drugs). For information
regarding clinical recommendations see DRUG INTERACTIONS.
Table 5: Drug Interactions: Changes in Pharmacokinetic Parameters
for Efavirenz in the Presence of the Coadministered Drug
| |
Mean % Change of Efavirenz Pharmacokinetic Parametersa
(90% CI) |
| Coadministered Drug |
Dose of Coadministered Drug (mg) |
Efavirenz Dose (mg) |
N |
Cmax |
AUC |
Cmin |
| Indinavir |
800 mg q8h × 14 days |
200 mg × 14 days |
11 |
↔ |
↔ |
↔ |
| Lopinavir/ ritonavir |
400/100 mg q12h × 9 days |
600 mg × 9 days |
11,12b |
↔ |
↓ 16
(↓ 38 to ↑ 15) |
↓ 16
(↓ 42 to ↑ 20) |
| Nelfinavir |
750 mg q8h × 7 days |
600 mg × 7 days |
10 |
↓ 12
(↓ 32 to ↑ 13)c |
↓ 12
(↓ 35 to ↑ 18)c |
↓ 21
(↓ 53 to ↑ 33) |
| Ritonavir |
500 mg q12h × 8 days |
600 mg × 10 days |
9 |
↑ 14
(↑ 4 to ↑ 26) |
↑ 21
(↑ 10 to ↑ 34) |
↑ 25
(↑ 7 to ↑ 46)c |
| Saquinavir SGCd |
1200 mg q8h × 10 days |
600 mg × 10 days |
13 |
↓ 13
(↓ 5 to ↓ 20) |
↓ 12
(↓ 4 to ↓ 19) |
↓ 14
(↓ 2 to ↓ 24)c |
| Clarithromycin |
500 mg q12h × 7 days |
400 mg × 7 days |
12 |
↑ 11
(↑ 3 to ↑ 19) |
↔ |
↔ |
| Itraconazole |
200 mg q12h × 14 days |
600 mg × 28 days |
16 |
↔ |
↔ |
↔ |
| Rifabutin |
300 mg qd × 14 days |
600 mg × 14 days |
11 |
↔ |
↔ |
↓ 12
(↓ 24 to ↑ 1) |
| Rifampin |
600 mg × 7 days |
600 mg × 7 days |
12 |
↓ 20
(↓ 11 to ↓ 28) |
↓ 26
(↓ 15 to ↓ 36) |
↓ 32
(↓ 15 to ↓ 46) |
| Atorvastatin |
10 mg qd × 4 days |
600 mg × 15 days |
14 |
↔ |
↔ |
↔ |
| Pravastatin |
40 mg qd × 4 days |
600 mg × 15 days |
11 |
↔ |
↔ |
↔ |
| Simvastatin |
40 mg qd × 4 days |
600 mg × 15 days |
14 |
↓ 12
(↓ 28 to ↑ 8) |
↔ |
↓ 12
(↓ 25 to ↑ 3) |
| Carbamazepine |
200 mg qd ×3 days, 200 mg bid× 3 days, then 400 mg qd
×15 days |
600 mg × 35 days |
14 |
↓ 21
(↓ 15 to ↓ 26) |
↓ 36
(↓ 32 to ↓ 40) |
↓ 47
(↓ 41 to ↓ 53) |
| Diltiazem |
240 mg × 14 days |
600 mg × 28 days |
12 |
↑ 16
(↑ 6 to ↑ 26) |
↑ 11
(↑ 5 to ↑ 18) |
↑ 13
(↑ 1 to ↑ 26) |
| Ethinyl estradiol |
50 µg single dose |
400 mg × 10 days |
13 |
↔ |
↔ |
↔ |
| Sertraline |
50 mg qd × 14 days |
600 mg × 14 days |
13 |
↑ 11
(↑ 6 to ↑ 16) |
↔ |
↔ |
| Voriconazole |
400 mg po q12h ×1 day then 200 mg po q12h × 8 days |
400 mg × 9 days |
NA |
↑ 38e |
↑ 44e |
NA |
| 300 mg po q12h days 2-7 |
300 mg × 7 days |
NA |
↓ 14f
(↓ 7 to ↓ 21) |
↔f |
NA |
| 400 mg po q12h days 2-7 |
300 mg × 7 days |
NA |
↔f |
↑ 17f
(↑ 6 to ↑ 29) |
NA |
NA = not available
a. Increase = ↑; Decrease = ↓; No Effect = ↔
b. Parallel-group design; N for efavirenz + lopinavir/ritonavir,
N for efavirenz alone.
c. 95% CI
d. Soft Gelatin Capsule
e. 90% CI not available
f. Relative to steady-state administration of efavirenz (600
mg once daily for 9 days). |
Table 6: Drug Interactions: Changes in Pharmacokinetic Parameters
for Coadministered Drug in the Presence of Efavirenz
| |
Mean % Change of Coadministered Drug Pharmacokinetic
Parametersa (90% CI) |
| Coadministered Drug |
Dose of Coadministered Drug (mg) |
Efavirenz Dose (mg) |
N |
Cmax |
AUC |
Cmin |
| Atazanavir |
400 mg qd with a light meal d 1–20 |
600 mg qdwith a lightmeal d 7–20 |
27 |
↓ 59
(↓ 49 to ↓ 67) |
↓ 74
(↓ 68 to ↓ 78) |
↓ 93
(↓ 90 to ↓ 95) |
| 400 mg qd d 1–6, then 300 mg qd d 7–20 with ritonavir
100 mg qd and a light meal |
600 mg qd 2 h after atazanavir and ritonavird 7–20 |
13 |
↑ 14b
(↓ 17 to ↑ 58) |
↑ 39b
(↑ 2 to ↑ 88) |
↑ 48b
(↑ 24 to ↑ 76) |
| Indinavir |
1000 mg q8h × 10 days |
600 mg × 10 days |
20 |
|
|
|
| After morning dose |
|
↔c |
↓ 33c
(↓ 26 to ↓ 39) |
↓ 39c
(↓ 24 to ↓ 51) |
| After afternoon dose |
|
↔c |
↓ 37c
(↓ 26 to ↓ 46) |
↓ 52c
(↓ 47 to ↓ 57) |
| After evening dose |
|
↓ 29c
(↓ 11 to ↓ 43) |
↓ 46c
(↓ 37 to ↓ 54) |
↓ 57c
(↓ 50 to ↓ 63) |
| Lopinavir/ ritonavir |
400/100 mg q12h × 9 days |
600 mg × 9 days |
11,7d |
↔e |
↓ 19e
(↓ 36 to ↑ 3) |
↓ 39e
(↓ 3 to ↓ 62) |
| Nelfinavir |
750 mg q8h × 7 days |
600 mg × 7 days |
10 |
↑ 21
(↑ 10 to ↑ 33) |
↑ 20
(↑ 8 to ↑ 34) |
↔ |
| Metabolite AG-1402 |
↓ 40
(↓ 30 to ↓ 48) |
↓ 37
(↓ 25 to ↓ 48) |
↓ 43
(↓ 21 to ↓ 59) |
| Ritonavir |
500 mg q12h × 8 days |
600 mg × 10 days |
11 |
|
|
|
| After AM dose |
|
↑ 24
(↑ 12 to ↑ 38) |
↑ 18
(↑ 6 to ↑ 33) |
↑ 42
(↑ 9 to ↑ 86)f |
| After PM dose |
|
↔ |
↔ |
↑ 24 (↑ 3 to↑ 50)f |
| Saquinavir SGCg |
1200 mg q8h × 10 days |
600 mg × 10 days |
12 |
↓ 50
(↓ 28 to ↓ 66) |
↓ 62
(↓ 45 to ↓ 74) |
↓ 56
(↓ 16 to ↓ 77)f |
| Clarithromycin |
500 mg q12h × 7 days |
400 mg × 7 days |
11 |
↓ 26
(↓ 15 to ↓ 35) |
↓ 39
(↓ 30 to ↓ 46) |
↓ 53
(↓ 42 to ↓ 63) |
| 14-OH metabolite |
|
|
|
↑ 49
(↑ 32 to ↑ 69) |
↑ 34
(↑ 18 to ↑ 53) |
↑ 26
(↑ 9 to ↑ 45) |
| Itraconazole |
200 mg q12h × 28 days |
600 mg ×14 days |
18 |
↓ 37(↓ 20 to ↓ 51) |
↓ 39(↓ 21 to ↓ 53) |
↓ 44(↓ 27 to ↓ 58) |
| Hydroxy-itraconazole |
|
|
|
↓ 35(↓ 12 to↓ 52) |
↓ 37(↓ 14 to↓ 55) |
↓ 43(↓ 18 to↓ 60) |
| Rifabutin |
300 mg qd × 14 days |
600 mg × 14 days |
9 |
↓ 32
(↓ 15 to ↓ 46) |
↓ 38
(↓ 28 to ↓ 47) |
↓ 45
(↓ 31 to ↓ 56) |
| Atorvastatin |
10 mg qd × 4 days |
600 mg × 15 days |
14 |
↓ 14
(↓ 1 to ↓ 26) |
↓ 43
(↓ 34 to ↓ 50) |
↓ 69
(↓ 49 to ↓ 81) |
| Total active (including metabolites) |
↓ 15
(↓ 2 to ↓ 26) |
↓ 32
(↓ 21 to ↓ 41) |
↓ 48
(↓ 23 to ↓ 64) |
| Pravastatin |
40 mg qd × 4 days |
600 mg × 15 days |
13 |
↓ 32
(↓ 59 to↑ 12) |
↓ 44
(↓ 26 to↓ 57) |
↓ 19
(↓ 0 to ↓ 35) |
| Simvastatin |
40 mg qd × 4 days |
600 mg × 15 days |
14 |
↓ 72
(↓ 63 to ↓ 79) |
↓ 68
(↓ 62 to ↓ 73) |
↓ 45
(↓ 20 to ↓ 62) |
| Total active (including metabolites) |
|
|
|
↓ 68
(↓ 55 to ↓ 78) |
↓ 60
(↓ 52 to ↓ 68) |
NAj |
| Carbamazepine |
200 mg qd × 3 days, 200 mg bid × 3 days, then 400 mg
qd ×29 days |
600 mg × 14 days |
12 |
↓ 20
(↓ 15 to ↓ 24) |
↓ 27
(↓ 20 to ↓ 33) |
↓ 35
(↓ 24 to ↓ 44) |
| Epoxide metabolite |
|
|
|
↔ |
↔ |
↓ 13
(↓ 30 to ↑ 7) |
| Diltiazem |
240 mg × 21 days |
600 mg × 14 days |
13 |
↓ 60
(↓ 50 to ↓ 68) |
↓ 69
(↓ 55 to ↓ 79) |
↓ 63
(↓ 44 to ↓ 75) |
| Desacetyl diltiazem |
|
|
|
↓ 64
(↓ 57 to ↓ 69) |
↓ 75
(↓ 59 to ↓ 84) |
↓ 62
(↓ 44 to ↓ 75) |
| N-monodesmethyl diltiazem |
|
|
|
↓ 28
(↓ 7 to ↓ 44) |
↓ 37
(↓ 17 to ↓ 52) |
↓ 37
(↓ 17 to ↓ 52) |
| Ethinyl estradiol |
50 µg single dose |
400 mg × 10 days |
13 |
↔ |
↑ 37
(↑ 25 to ↑ 51) |
NA |
| Methadone |
Stable maintenance 35–100 mg daily |
600 mg × 14–21 days |
11 |
↓ 45
(↓ 25 to ↓ 59) |
↓ 52
(↓ 33 to ↓ 66) |
NA |
| Sertraline |
50 mg qd × 14 days |
600 mg × 14 days |
13 |
↓ 29
(↓ 15 to ↓ 40) |
↓ 39
(↓ 27 to ↓ 50) |
↓ 46
(↓ 31 to ↓ 58) |
| Voriconazole |
400 mg po q12h × 1day then 200 mg po q12h x 8 days |
400 mg × 9 days |
NA |
↓ 61h |
↓ 77h |
NA |
| 300 mg po q12h days 2-7 |
300 mg × 7 days |
NA |
↓ 36i
(↓ 21 to ↓ 49) |
↓ 55i
(↓ 45 to ↓ 62) |
NA |
| 400 mg po q12h days 2-7 |
300 mg × 7 days |
NA |
↑ 23i
(↓ 1 to ↑ 53 |
↓ 7i
(↓ 23 to ↑ 13) |
NA |
NA = not available
a. Increase = ↑ Decrease = ↓; No Effect = ↔
b. Compared with atazanavir 400 mg qd alone.
c. Comparator dose of indinavir was 800 mg q8h x 10 days.
d. Parallel-group design; N for efavirenz + lopinavir/ritonavir,
N for lopinavir/ritonavir alone.
e. Values are for lopinavir. The pharmacokinetics of ritonavir
100 mg q12h are unaffected by concurrent efavirenz.
f. 95% CI
g. Soft Gelatin Capsule
h. 90% CI not available
i. Relative to steady-state administration of voriconazole
(400 mg for 1 day, then 200 mg po q12h for 2 days).
j. Not available because of insufficient data. |
Emtricitabine and Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate: The steady-state
pharmacokinetics of emtricitabine and tenofovir were unaffected when emtricitabine
and tenofovir DF were administered together versus each agent dosed alone.
In vitro and clinical pharmacokinetic drug-drug interaction studies
have shown that the potential for CYP mediated interactions involving emtricitabine
and tenofovir with other medicinal products is low.
Emtricitabine and tenofovir are primarily excreted by the kidneys by a combination of glomerular filtration and active tubular secretion. No drug-drug interactions due to competition for renal excretion have been observed; however, coadministration of emtricitabine and tenofovir DF with drugs that are eliminated by active tubular secretion may increase concentrations of emtricitabine, tenofovir, and/or the coadministered drug.
Drugs that decrease renal function may increase concentrations of emtricitabine and/or tenofovir.
No clinically significant drug interactions have been observed between emtricitabine and famciclovir, indinavir, stavudine, tenofovir DF and zidovudine. Similarly, no clinically significant drug interactions have been observed between tenofovir DF and abacavir, adefovir dipivoxil, efavirenz, emtricitabine, indinavir, lamivudine, lopinavir/ritonavir, methadone, nelfinavir, oral contraceptives, ribavirin, and saquinavir/ritonavir in studies conducted in healthy volunteers.
Following multiple dosing to HIV-negative subjects receiving either chronic methadone maintenance therapy, oral contraceptives, or single doses of ribavirin, steady-state tenofovir pharmacokinetics were similar to those observed in previous studies, indicating a lack of clinically significant drug interactions between these agents and tenofovir DF.
The effects of coadministered drugs on the Cmax, AUC, and Cmin of tenofovir are shown in Table 7. The effects of coadministration of tenofovir DF on Cmax, AUC, and Cmin of coadministered drugs are shown in Table 8 and Table 9.
Table 7: Drug Interactions: Changes in Pharmacokinetic Parameters
for Tenofovir in the Presence of the Coadministered Druga,b
| Coadministered Drug |
Dose of Coadministered Drug (mg) |
N |
Mean % Change of Tenofovir Pharmacokinetic Parametersc
(90% CI) |
| Cmax |
AUC |
Cmin |
| Atazanavird |
400 once daily × 14 days |
33 |
↑ 14
(↑ 8 to ↑ 20) |
↑ 24
(↑ 21 to ↑ 28) |
↑ 22
(↑ 15 to ↑ 30) |
| Didanosine (enteric-coated) |
400 once |
25 |
↔ |
↔ |
↔ |
| Didanosine (buffered) |
250 or 400 once daily × 7 days |
14 |
↔ |
↔ |
↔ |
| Lopinavir/ ritonavir |
400/100 twice daily × 14 days |
24 |
↔ |
↑ 32
(↑ 25 to ↑ 38) |
↑ 51
(↑ 37 to ↑ 66) |
a. All interaction studies conducted in healthy
volunteers.
b. Patients received tenofovir DF 300 mg once daily.
c. Increase = ↑; Decrease = ↓; No Effect =
↔
d. Reyataz Prescribing Information |
Table 8: Drug Interactions: Changes in Pharmacokinetic Parameters
for Coadministered Drug in the Presence of Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumaratea,b
| Coadministered Drug |
Dose of Coadministered Drug (mg) |
N |
Mean % Change of Coadministered Drug Pharmacokinetic Parametersc
(90% CI) |
| Cmax |
AUC |
Cmin |
| Atazanavird |
400 once daily × 14 days |
34 |
↓ 21
(↓ 27 to ↓ 14) |
↓ 25
(↓ 30 to ↓ 19) |
↓ 40
(↓ 48 to ↓ 32) |
| Atazanavir/ritonavir 300/100 once daily× 42 days |
10 |
↓ 28
(↓ 50 to ↑ 5) |
↓ 25e
(↓ 42 to ↓ 3) |
↓ 23e
(↓ 46 to ↑ 10) |
| Lopinavir |
Lopinavir/ritonavir 400/100 twice daily× 14 days |
24 |
↔ |
↔ |
↔ |
| Ritonavir |
Lopinavir/ritonavir 400/100 twice daily× 14 days |
24 |
↔ |
↔ |
↔ |
a. All interaction studies conducted in healthy
volunteers.
b. Patients received tenofovir DF 300 mg once daily.
c. Increase = ↑; Decrease = ↓; No Effect =↔
d. Reyataz Prescribing Information
e. In HIV-infected patients, addition of tenofovir DF to atazanavir
300 mg plus ritonavir 100 mg, resulted in AUC and Cmin values of atazanavir
that were 2.3- and 4-fold higher than the respective values observed for
atazanavir 400 mg when given alone. |
Coadministration of tenofovir DF with didanosine results in changes in the
pharmacokinetics of didanosine that may be of clinical significance. Table 9
summarizes the effects of tenofovir DF on the pharmacokinetics of didanosine.
Concomitant dosing of tenofovir DF with didanosine buffered tablets or enteric-coated
capsules significantly increases the Cmax and AUC of didanosine. When didanosine
250 mg enteric-coated capsules were administered with tenofovir DF, systemic
exposures of didanosine were similar to those seen with the 400 mg enteric-coated
capsules alone under fasted conditions. The mechanism of this interaction is
unknown [for didanosine dosing adjustment recommendations see DRUG INTERACTIONS],
Table 4.
Table 9: Drug Interactions: Changes in Pharmacokinetic Parameters
for Didanosine in the Presence of Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumaratea,b
| Didanosine Dose (mg)/Method of
Administrationd |
Tenofovir DF Method of Administrationb,d |
N |
Mean % Change (90% CI) vs. Didanosine 400 mg Alone, Fastedc |
| Cmax |
AUC |
| Buffered tablets |
| 400 once dailye x 7 days |
Fasted 1 hour after didanosine |
14 |
↑ 28
(↑11 to ↑ 48) |
↑ 44
(↑ 31 to ↑ 59) |
| Enteric coated capsules |
| 400 once, fasted |
With food, 2 hr after didanosine |
26 |
↑ 48
(↑ 25 to ↑ 76) |
↑ 48
(↑ 31 to ↑ 67) |
| 400 once, with food |
Simultaneously with didanosine |
26 |
↑ 64
(↑ 41 to ↑ 89) |
↑ 60
(↑ 44 to ↑79) |
| 250 once, fasted |
With food, 2 hr after didanosine |
28 |
↓ 10
(↓ 22 to ↑3) |
↔ |
| 250 once, fasted |
Simultaneously with didanosine |
28 |
↔ |
↑14
(0 to ↑ 31) |
| 250 once, with food |
Simultaneously with didanosine |
28 |
↓29
(↓39 to ↓18) |
↓11
(↓ 23 to ↑ 2) |
a. All interaction studies conducted in healthy
volunteers.
b. Patients received tenofovir DF 300 mg once daily.
c. Increase = ↑; Decrease = ↓; No Effect = ↔
d. Administration with food was with a light meal (~373 kcal,
20% fat).
e. Includes 4 subjects weighing < 60 kg receiving ddI 250 mg.
|
Microbiology
Mechanism of Action
Efavirenz: Efavirenz is a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase
(RT) inhibitor of HIV-1. Efavirenz activity is mediated predominantly by noncompetitive
inhibition of HIV-1 reverse transcriptase (RT). HIV-2 RT and human cellular
DNA polymerases α, β, γ, and δ are not inhibited by efavirenz.
Emtricitabine: Emtricitabine, a synthetic nucleoside analog of
cytidine, is phosphorylated by cellular enzymes to form emtricitabine 5'-triphosphate.
Emtricitabine 5'-triphosphate inhibits the activity of the HIV-1 RT by competing
with the natural substrate deoxycytidine 5'-triphosphate and by being incorporated
into nascent viral DNA which results in chain termination. Emtricitabine 5'-triphosphate
is a weak inhibitor of mammalian DNA polymerase α, β, ε, and mitochondrial
DNA polymerase γ.
Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate: Tenofovir DF is an acyclic nucleoside
phosphonate diester analog of adenosine monophosphate. Tenofovir DF requires
initial diester hydrolysis for conversion to tenofovir and subsequent phosphorylations
by cellular enzymes to form tenofovir diphosphate. Tenofovir diphosphate inhibits
the activity of HIV-1 RT by competing with the natural substrate deoxyadenosine
5'-triphosphate and, after incorporation into DNA, by DNA chain termination.
Tenofovir diphosphate is a weak inhibitor of mammalian DNA polymerases α, β,
and mitochondrial DNA polymerase γ.
Antiviral Activity
Efavirenz, Emtricitabine, and Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate:
In combination studies evaluating the antiviral activity in cell culture of
emtricitabine and efavirenz together, efavirenz and tenofovir together, and
emtricitabine and tenofovir together, additive to synergistic antiviral effects
were observed.
Efavirenz: The concentration of efavirenz inhibiting replication
of wild-type laboratory adapted strains and clinical isolates in cell culture
by 90-95% (EC90-95) ranged from 1.7-25 nM in lymphoblastoid cell
lines, peripheral blood mononuclear cells, and macrophage/monocyte cultures.
Efavirenz demonstrated additive antiviral activity against HIV-1 in cell culture
when combined with non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs)
(delavirdine and nevirapine), nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs)
(abacavir, didanosine, lamivudine, stavudine, zalcitabine, and zidovudine),
protease inhibitors (PIs) (amprenavir, indinavir, lopinavir, nelfinavir, ritonavir,
and saquinavir), and the fusion inhibitor enfuvirtide. Efavirenz demonstrated
additive to antagonistic antiviral activity in cell culture with atazanavir.
Efavirenz demonstrated antiviral activity against most non-clade B isolates
(subtypes A, AE, AG, C, D, F, G, J, and N), but had reduced antiviral activity
against group O viruses. Efavirenz is not active against HIV-2.
Emtricitabine: The antiviral activity in cell culture of emtricitabine
against laboratory and clinical isolates of HIV-1 was assessed in lymphoblastoid
cell lines, the MAGI-CCR5 cell line, and peripheral blood mononuclear cells.
The 50% effective concentration (EC50) values for emtricitabine were
in the range of 0.0013-0.64 µM (0.0003-0.158 µg/mL). In drug combination studies
of emtricitabine with NRTIs (abacavir, lamivudine, stavudine, zalcitabine, and
zidovudine), NNRTIs (delavirdine, efavirenz, and nevirapine), and PIs (amprenavir,
nelfinavir, ritonavir, and saquinavir), additive to synergistic effects were
observed. Emtricitabine displayed antiviral activity in cell culture against
HIV-1 clades A, B, C, D, E, F, and G (EC50 values ranged from 0.007-0.075
µM) and showed strain specific activity against HIV-2 (EC50 values
ranged from 0.007-1.5 µM).
Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate: The antiviral activity in cell
culture of tenofovir against laboratory and clinical isolates of HIV-1 was assessed
in lymphoblastoid cell lines, primary monocyte/macrophage cells and peripheral
blood lymphocytes. The EC50 values for tenofovir were in the range of 0.04-8.5
µM. In drug combination studies of tenofovir with NRTIs (abacavir, didanosine,
lamivudine, stavudine, zalcitabine, and zidovudine), NNRTIs (delavirdine, efavirenz,
and nevirapine), and PIs (amprenavir, indinavir, nelfinavir, ritonavir, and
saquinavir), additive to synergistic effects were observed. Tenofovir displayed
antiviral activity in cell culture against HIV-1 clades A, B, C, D, E, F, G
and O (EC50 values ranged from 0.5-2.2 µM) and showed strain specific activity
against HIV-2 (EC50 values ranged from 1.6 µM to 5.5 µM).
Resistance
Efavirenz, Emtricitabine, and Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate:
HIV-1 isolates with reduced susceptibility to the combination of emtricitabine
and tenofovir have been selected in cell culture and in clinical studies. Genotypic
analysis of these isolates identified the M184V/I and/or K65R amino acid substitutions
in the viral RT.
In a clinical study of treatment-naïve patients [Study 934, see Clinical
Studies] resistance analysis was performed on HIV-1 isolates from all confirmed
virologic failure patients with > 400 copies/mL of HIV-1 RNA at Week 144 or
early discontinuations. Genotypic resistance to efavirenz, predominantly the
K103N substitution, was the most common form of resistance that developed. Resistance
to efavirenz occurred in 13/19 analyzed patients in the emtricitabine + tenofovir
DF group and in 21/29 analyzed patients in the zidovudine/lamivudine fixed-dose
combination group. The M184V amino acid substitution, associated with resistance
to emtricitabine and lamivudine, was observed in 2/19 analyzed patient isolates
in the emtricitabine + tenofovir DF group and in 10/29 analyzed patient isolates
in the zidovudine/lamivudine group. Through 144 weeks of Study 934, no patients
developed a detectable K65R substitution in their HIV-1 as analyzed through
standard genotypic analysis.
In a clinical study of treatment-naïve patients, isolates from 8/47 (17%) analyzed patients receiving tenofovir DF developed the K65R substitution through 144 weeks of therapy; 7 of these occurred in the first 48 weeks of treatment and one at Week 96. In treatment experienced patients, 14/304 (5%) of tenofovir DF treated patients with virologic failure through Week 96 showed > 1.4 fold (median 2.7) reduced susceptibility to tenofovir. Genotypic analysis of the resistant isolates showed a substitution in the HIV-1 RT gene resulting in the K65R amino acid substitution.
Efavirenz: Clinical isolates with reduced susceptibility in cell
culture to efavirenz have been obtained. The most frequently observed amino
acid substitution in clinical studies with efavirenz is K103N (54%). One or
more RT substitutions at amino acid positions 98, 100, 101, 103, 106, 108, 188,
190, 225, 227, and 230 were observed in patients failing treatment with efavirenz
in combination with other antiretrovirals. Other resistance substitutions observed
to emerge commonly included L100I (7%), K101E/Q/R (14%), V108I (11%), G190S/T/A
(7%), P225H (18%), and M230I/L (11%).
HIV-1 isolates with reduced susceptibility to efavirenz ( > 380-fold increase in EC90 value) emerged rapidly under selection in cell culture. Genotypic characterization of these viruses identified substitutions resulting in single amino acid substitutions L100I or V179D, double substitutions L100I/V108I, and triple substitutions L100I/V179D/Y181C in RT.
Emtricitabine: Emtricitabine-resistant isolates of HIV-1 have
been selected in cell culture and in clinical studies. Genotypic analysis of
these isolates showed that the reduced susceptibility to emtricitabine was associated
with a substitution in the HIV-1 RT gene at codon 184 which resulted in an amino
acid substitution of methionine by valine or isoleucine (M184V/I).
Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate: HIV-1 isolates with reduced susceptibility
to tenofovir have been selected in cell culture. These viruses expressed a K65R
substitution in RT and showed a 2–4 fold reduction in susceptibility to tenofovir.
Cross Resistance
Efavirenz, Emtricitabine, and Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate:
Cross-resistance has been recognized among NNRTIs. Cross resistance has also
been recognized among certain NRTIs. The M184V/I and/or K65R substitutions selected
in cell culture by the combination of emtricitabine and tenofovir are also observed
in some HIV-1 isolates from subjects failing treatment with tenofovir in combination
with either lamivudine or emtricitabine, and either abacavir or didanosine.
Therefore, cross-resistance among these drugs may occur in patients whose virus
harbors either or both of these amino acid substitutions.
Efavirenz: Clinical isolates previously characterized as efavirenz-resistant
were also phenotypically resistant in cell culture to delavirdine and nevirapine
compared to baseline. Delavirdine- and/or nevirapine-resistant clinical viral
isolates with NNRTI resistance-associated substitutions (A98G, L100I, K101E/P,
K103N/S, V106A, Y181X, Y188X, G190X, P225H, F227L, or M230L) showed reduced
susceptibility to efavirenz in cell culture. Greater than 90% of NRTI-resistant
isolates tested in cell culture retained susceptibility to efavirenz.
Emtricitabine: Emtricitabine-resistant isolates (M184V/I) were
cross-resistant to lamivudine and zalcitabine but retained susceptibility in
cell culture to didanosine, stavudine, tenofovir, zidovudine, and NNRTIs (delavirdine,
efavirenz, and nevirapine). HIV-1 isolates containing the K65R substitution,
selected in vivo by abacavir, didanosine, tenofovir, and zalcitabine,
demonstrated reduced susceptibility to inhibition by emtricitabine. Viruses
harboring substitutions conferring reduced susceptibility to stavudine and zidovudine
(M41L, D67N, K70R, L210W, T215Y/F, and K219Q/E) or didanosine (L74V) remained
sensitive to emtricitabine.
Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate: The K65R substitution selected
by tenofovir is also selected in some HIV-1 infected patients treated with abacavir,
didanosine, or zalcitabine. HIV-1 isolates with the K65R substitution also showed
reduced susceptibility to emtricitabine and lamivudine. Therefore, cross-resistance
among these drugs may occur in patients whose virus harbors the K65R substitution.
HIV-1 isolates from patients (N=20) whose HIV-1 expressed a mean of 3 zidovudine-associated
RT amino acid substitutions (M41L, D67N, K70R, L210W, T215Y/F, or K219Q/E/N)
showed a 3.1-fold decrease in the susceptibility to tenofovir. Multinucleoside
resistant HIV-1 with a T69S double insertion substitution in the RT showed reduced
susceptibility to tenofovir.
Animal Toxicology and/or Pharmacology
Efavirenz: Nonsustained convulsions were observed in 6 of 20
monkeys receiving efavirenz at doses yielding plasma AUC values 4- to 13-fold
greater than those in humans given the recommended dose.
Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate: Tenofovir and tenofovir DF administered
in toxicology studies to rats, dogs and monkeys at exposures (based on AUCs)
greater than or equal to 6-fold those observed in humans caused bone toxicity.
In monkeys the bone toxicity was diagnosed as osteomalacia. Osteomalacia observed
in monkeys appeared to be reversible upon dose reduction or discontinuation
of tenofovir. In rats and dogs, the bone toxicity manifested as reduced bone
mineral density. The mechanism(s) underlying bone toxicity is unknown.
Evidence of renal toxicity was noted in 4 animal species administered tenofovir and tenofovir DF. Increases in serum creatinine, BUN, glycosuria, proteinuria, phosphaturia and/or calciuria and decreases in serum phosphate were observed to varying degrees in these animals. These toxicities were noted at exposures (based on AUCs) 2–20 times higher than those observed in humans. The relationship of the renal abnormalities, particularly the phosphaturia, to the bone toxicity is not known.
Clinical Studies
Clinical Study 934 supports the use of ATRIPLA tablets in antiretroviral treatment-naïve HIV-1 infected patients. Additional data in support of the use of ATRIPLA in treatment naïve patients can be found in the prescribing information for VIREAD.
In antiretroviral treatment-experienced patients, the use of ATRIPLA tablets
may be considered for patients with HIV-1 strains that are expected to be susceptible
to the components of ATRIPLA as assessed by treatment history or by genotypic
or phenotypic testing.
Study 934: Data through 144 weeks are reported for Study 934,
a randomized, open-label, active-controlled multicenter study comparing emtricitabine
+ tenofovir DF administered in combination with efavirenz versus zidovudine/lamivudine
fixed-dose combination administered in combination with efavirenz in 511 antiretroviral-naïve
patients. From weeks 96 to 144 of the study, patients received emtricitabine/tenofovir
DF fixed-dose combination with efavirenz in place of emtricitabine + tenofovir
DF with efavirenz. Patients had a mean age of 38 years (range 18–80), 86% were
male, 59% were Caucasian and 23% were Black. The mean baseline CD4+
cell count was 245 cells/mm3 (range 2–1191) and median baseline plasma
HIV-1 RNA was 5.01 log10 copies/mL (range 3.56–6.54). Patients were
stratified by baseline CD4+ cell count ( < or ≥ 200 cells/mm3)
and 41% had CD4+ cell counts < 200 cells/mm3. Fifty-one percent
(51%) of patients had baseline viral loads > 100,000 copies/mL. Treatment
outcomes through 48 and 144 weeks for those patients who did not have efavirenz
resistance at baseline (n=487) are presented in Table 10.
Table 10: Outcomes of Randomized Treatment at Weeks 48 and
144 (Study 934)
| Outcomes |
At Week 48 |
At Week 144 |
FTC + TDF+ EFV
(N=244) |
AZT/3TC + EFV
(N=243) |
FTC + TDF + EFV
(N=227)a |
AZT/3TC + EFV
(N=229)a |
| Responderb |
84% |
73% |
71% |
58% |
| Virologic failurec |
2% |
4% |
3% |
6% |
| Rebound |
1% |
3% |
2% |
5% |
| Never suppressed |
0% |
0% |
0% |
0% |
| Change in antiretroviral regimen |
1% |
1% |
1% |
1% |
| Death |
< 1% |
1% |
1% |
1% |
| Discontinued due to adverse event |
4% |
9% |
5% |
12% |
| Discontinued for otherreasonsd |
10% |
14% |
20% |
22% |
a. Patients who were responders at Week 48 or Week
96 (HIV-1 RNA < 400 copies/mL) but did not consent to continue study after
Week 48 or Week 96 were excluded from analysis.
b. Patients achieved and maintained confirmed HIV-1 RNA < 400
copies/mL through Weeks 48 and 144.
c. Includes confirmed viral rebound and failure to achieve confirmed
HIV-1 RNA < 400 copies/mL through Weeks 48 and 144.
d. Includes lost to follow-up, patient withdrawal, noncompliance,
protocol violation and other reasons. |
Through Week 48, 84% and 73% of patients in the emtricitabine + tenofovir DF
group and the zidovudine/lamivudine group, respectively, achieved and maintained
HIV-1 RNA < 400 copies/mL (71% and 58% through Week 144). The difference in
the proportion of patients who achieved and maintained HIV-1 RNA < 400 copies/mL
through 48 weeks largely results from the higher number of discontinuations
due to adverse events and other reasons in the zidovudine/lamivudine group in
this open-label study. In addition, 80% and 70% of patients in the emtricitabine
+ tenofovir DF group and the zidovudine/lamivudine group, respectively, achieved
and maintained HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL through Week 48 (64% and 56% through
Week 144). The mean increase from baseline in CD4+ cell count was
190 cells/mm3 in the emtricitabine + tenofovir DF group and 158 cells/mm3
in the zidovudine/lamivudine group at Week 48 (312 and 271 cells/mm3
at Week 144).
Through 48 weeks, 7 patients in the emtricitabine + tenofovir DF group and 5 patients in the zidovudine/lamivudine group experienced a new CDC Class C event (10 and 6 patients through 144 weeks).
Last updated on RxList: 2/7/2009