Cardiac Failure
AVANDIA, like other thiazolidinediones, alone or in combination with other
antidiabetic agents, can cause fluid retention, which may exacerbate or lead
to heart failure. Patients should be observed for signs and symptoms of heart
failure. If these signs and symptoms develop, the heart failure should be managed
according to current standards of care. Furthermore, discontinuation or dose
reduction of rosiglitazone must be considered [see BOXED
WARNING].
Patients with congestive heart failure (CHF) NYHA Class I and II treated with
AVANDIA have an increased risk of cardiovascular events. A 52-week, double-blind,
placebo-controlled echocardiographic study was conducted in 224 patients with
type 2 diabetes mellitus and NYHA Class I or II CHF (ejection fraction ≤ 45%)
on background antidiabetic and CHF therapy. An independent committee conducted
a blinded evaluation of fluid-related events (including congestive heart failure)
and cardiovascular hospitalizations according to predefined criteria (adjudication).
Separate from the adjudication, other cardiovascular adverse events were reported
by investigators. Although no treatment difference in change from baseline of
ejection fractions was observed, more cardiovascular adverse events were observed
following treatment with AVANDIA compared to placebo during the 52-week study.
(See Table 1.)
Table 1. Emergent Cardiovascular Adverse Events in Patients
With Congestive Heart Failure (NYHA Class I and II) Treated With AVANDIA or
Placebo (in Addition to Background Antidiabetic and CHF Therapy)
| Events |
AVANDIA
N = 110
n (%) |
Placebo
N = 114
n (%) |
| Adjudicated |
| Cardiovascular deaths |
5 (5%) |
4 (4%) |
| CHF worsening |
7 (6%) |
4 (4%) |
| – with overnight hospitalization |
5 (5%) |
4 (4%) |
| – without overnight hospitalization |
2 (2%) |
0 (0%) |
| New or worsening edema |
28 (25%) |
10 (9%) |
| New or worsening dyspnea |
29 (26%) |
19 (17%) |
| Increases in CHF medication |
36 (33%) |
20 (18%) |
| Cardiovascular hospitalization* |
21 (19%) |
15 (13%) |
| Investigator-reported, non-adjudicated |
| Ischemic adverse events |
10 (9%) |
5 (4%) |
| – Myocardial infarction |
5 (5%) |
2 (2%) |
| – Angina |
6 (5%) |
3 (3%) |
| * Includes hospitalization for
any cardiovascular reason. |
Initiation of AVANDIA in patients with established NYHA Class III or IV heart
failure is contraindicated. AVANDIA is not recommended in patients with symptomatic
heart failure. [See BOXED WARNING.]
Patients experiencing acute coronary syndromes have not been studied in controlled
clinical trials. In view of the potential for development of heart failure in
patients having an acute coronary event, initiation of AVANDIA is not recommended
for patients experiencing an acute coronary event, and discontinuation of AVANDIA
during this acute phase should be considered.
Patients with NYHA Class III and IV cardiac status (with or without CHF) have
not been studied in controlled clinical trials. AVANDIA is not recommended in
patients with NYHA Class III and IV cardiac status.
Myocardial Ischemia
Meta-Analysis of Myocardial Ischemia in a Group of 42 Clinical Trials
A meta-analysis was conducted retrospectively to assess cardiovascular adverse
events reported across 42 double-blind, randomized, controlled clinical trials
(mean duration 6 months).1
These studies had been conducted to assess glucose-lowering efficacy in type
2 diabetes, and prospectively planned adjudication of cardiovascular events
had not occurred in the trials. Some trials were placebo-controlled and some
used active oral antidiabetic drugs as controls. Placebo-controlled studies
included monotherapy trials (monotherapy with AVANDIA versus placebo monotherapy)
and add-on trials (AVANDIA or placebo, added to sulfonylurea, metformin, or
insulin). Active control studies included monotherapy trials (monotherapy with
AVANDIA versus sulfonylurea or metformin monotherapy) and add-on trials (AVANDIA
plus sulfonylurea or AVANDIA plus metformin, versus sulfonylurea plus metformin).
A total of 14,237 patients were included (8,604 in treatment groups containing
AVANDIA, 5,633 in comparator groups), with 4,143 patient-years of exposure to
AVANDIA and 2,675 patient-years of exposure to comparator. Myocardial ischemic
events included angina pectoris, angina pectoris aggravated, unstable angina,
cardiac arrest, chest pain, coronary artery occlusion, dyspnea, myocardial infarction,
coronary thrombosis, myocardial ischemia, coronary artery disease, and coronary
artery disorder. In this analysis, an increased risk of myocardial ischemia
with AVANDIA versus pooled comparators was observed (2% AVANDIA versus 1.5%
comparators, odds ratio 1.4, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.1, 1.8). An increased
risk of myocardial ischemic events with AVANDIA was observed in the placebo-controlled
studies, but not in the active-controlled studies. (See Figure 1.)
A greater increased risk of myocardial ischemic events was observed in studies
where AVANDIA was added to insulin (2.8% for AVANDIA plus insulin versus 1.4%
for placebo plus insulin, [OR 2.1, 95% CI 0.9, 5.1]). This increased risk reflects
a difference of 3 events per 100 patient-years (95% CI -0.1, 6.3) between treatment
groups. [See WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS.]
Figure 1. Forest Plot of Odds Ratios (95% Confidence Intervals)
for Myocardial Ischemic Events in the Meta-Analysis of 42 Clinical Trials
A greater increased risk of myocardial ischemia was also observed in patients
who received AVANDIA and background nitrate therapy. For AVANDIA (N = 361) versus
control (N = 244) in nitrate users, the odds ratio was 2.9 (95% CI 1.4, 5.9),
while for non-nitrate users (about 14,000 patients total), the odds ratio was
1.3 (95% CI 0.9, 1.7). This increased risk represents a difference of 12 myocardial
ischemic events per 100 patient-years (95% CI 3.3, 21.4). Most of the nitrate
users had established coronary heart disease. Among patients with known coronary
heart disease who were not on nitrate therapy, an increased risk of myocardial
ischemic events for AVANDIA versus comparator was not demonstrated.
Myocardial Ischemic Events in Large Long-Term Prospective Randomized Controlled
Trials of AVANDIA
Data from 3 other large, long-term, prospective, randomized, controlled clinical
trials of AVANDIA were assessed separately from the meta-analysis. These 3 trials
include a total of 14,067 patients (treatment groups containing AVANDIA N =
6,311, comparator groups N = 7,756), with patient-year exposure of 21,803 patient-years
for AVANDIA and 25,998 patient-years for comparator. Duration of follow-up exceeded
3 years in each study. ADOPT (A Diabetes Outcomes Progression Trial) was a 4-
to 6-year randomized, active-controlled study in recently diagnosed patients
with type 2 diabetes naïve to drug therapy.
It was an efficacy and general safety trial that was designed to examine the
durability of
AVANDIA as monotherapy (N = 1,456) for glycemic control in type 2 diabetes,
with comparator arms of sulfonylurea monotherapy (N = 1,441) and metformin monotherapy
(N = 1,454). DREAM (Diabetes Reduction Assessment with Rosiglitazone and Ramipril
Medication, published report2) was a 3- to 5-year randomized, placebo-controlled
study in patients with impaired glucose tolerance and/or impaired fasting glucose.
It had a 2x2 factorial design, intended to evaluate the effect of AVANDIA, and
separately of ramipril (an angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor [ACEI]),
on progression to overt diabetes. In DREAM, 2,635 patients were in treatment
groups containing AVANDIA, and 2,634 were in treatment groups not containing
AVANDIA.Interim results have been published 3 for RECORD (Rosiglitazone
Evaluated for Cardiac Outcomes and Regulation of Glycemia in Diabetes), an ongoing
open-label, 6-year cardiovascular outcomes study in patients with type 2 diabetes
with an average treatment duration of 3.75 years. RECORD includes patients who
have failed metformin or sulfonylurea monotherapy; those who have failed metformin
are randomized to receive either add-on AVANDIA or add-on sulfonylurea, and
those who have failed sulfonylurea are randomized to receive either add-on AVANDIA
or add-on metformin. In RECORD, a total of 2,220 patients are receiving add-on
AVANDIA, and 2,227 patients are on one of the add-on regimens not containing
AVANDIA.
For these 3 trials, analyses were performed using a composite of major adverse
cardiovascular events (myocardial infarction, cardiovascular death, or stroke),
referred to hereafter as MACE. This endpoint differed from the meta-analysis'
broad endpoint of myocardial ischemic events, more than half of which were angina.
Myocardial infarction included adjudicated fatal and nonfatal myocardial infarction
plus sudden death. As shown in Figure 2, the results for the 3 endpoints (MACE,
MI, and Total Mortality) were not statistically significantly different between
AVANDIA and comparators.
Figure 2. Hazard Ratios for the Risk of MACE (Myocardial
Infarction, Cardiovascular Death, or Stroke), Myocardial Infarction, and Total
Mortality With AVANDIA Compared With a Control Group
In preliminary analyses of the DREAM trial, the incidence of cardiovascular
events was higher among subjects who received AVANDIA in combination with ramipril
than among subjects who received ramipril alone, as illustrated in Figure 2.
This finding was not confirmed in ADOPT and RECORD (active-controlled trials
in patients with diabetes) in which 30% and 40% of patients respectively, reported
ACE-inhibitor use at baseline.
In their entirety, the available data on the risk of myocardial ischemia are
inconclusive. Definitive conclusions regarding this risk await completion of
an adequately-designed cardiovascular outcome study.
There have been no clinical studies establishing conclusive evidence of macrovascular
risk reduction with AVANDIA or any other oral antidiabetic drug.
Congestive Heart Failure and Myocardial Ischemia During Coadministration of
AVANDIA With Insulin
In studies in which AVANDIA was added to insulin, AVANDIA increased the risk
of congestive heart failure and myocardial ischemia. (See Table 2.)
Coadministration of AVANDIA and insulin is not recommended. [See Indications
and Usage and WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS.]
In five, 26-week, controlled, randomized, double-blind trials which were included
in the meta-analysis[see WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS] , patients with type
2 diabetes mellitus were randomized to coadministration of AVANDIA and insulin
(N = 867) or insulin (N = 663). In these 5 trials, AVANDIA was added to insulin.
These trials included patients with long-standing diabetes (median duration
of 12 years) and a high prevalence of pre-existing medical conditions, including
peripheral neuropathy, retinopathy, ischemic heart disease, vascular disease,
and congestive heart failure. The total number of patients with emergent congestive
heart failure was 21 (2.4%) and 7 (1.1%) in the AVANDIA plus insulin and insulin
groups, respectively. The total number of patients with emergent myocardial
ischemia was 24 (2.8%) and 9 (1.4%) in the AVANDIA plus insulin and insulin
groups, respectively (OR 2.1 [95% CI 0.9, 5.1]). Although the event rate for
congestive heart failure and myocardial ischemia was low in the studied population,
consistently the event rate was 2-fold or higher with coadministration of AVANDIA
and insulin. These cardiovascular events were noted at both the 4 mg and 8 mg
daily doses of AVANDIA. (See Table 2.)
Table 2. Occurrence of Cardiovascular Events in 5 Controlled
Trials of Addition of AVANDIA to Established Insulin Treatment
| Event* |
AVANDIA + Insulin
(n = 867)
n (%) |
Insulin
(n = 663)
n (%) |
| Congestive heart failure |
21 (2.4%) |
7 (1.1%) |
| Myocardial ischemia |
24 (2.8%) |
9 (1.4%) |
| Composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke |
10 (1.2%) |
5 (0.8%) |
| Stroke |
5 (0.6%) |
4 (0.6%) |
| Myocardial infarction |
4 (0.5%) |
1 (0.2%) |
| Cardiovascular death |
4 (0.5%) |
1 (0.2%) |
| All deaths |
6 (0.7%) |
1 (0.2%) |
| * Events are not exclusive; i.e.,
a patient with a cardiovascular death due to a myocardial infarction would
be counted in 4 event categories (myocardial ischemia; cardiovascular
death, myocardial infarction or stroke; myocardial infarction; cardiovascular
death). |
In a sixth, 24-week, controlled, randomized, double-blind trial of AVANDIA
and insulin coadministration, insulin was added to AVANDAMET® (rosiglitazone
maleate and metformin HCl) (n = 161) and compared to insulin plus placebo (n
= 158), after a single-blind 8-week run-in with AVANDAMET. Patients with edema
requiring pharmacologic therapy and those with congestive heart failure were
excluded at baseline and during the run-in period.
In the group receiving AVANDAMET plus insulin, there was one myocardial ischemic
event and one sudden death. No myocardial ischemia was observed in the insulin
group, and no congestive heart failure was reported in either treatment group.
Edema
AVANDIA should be used with caution in patients with edema. In a clinical study
in healthy volunteers who received 8 mg of AVANDIA once daily for 8 weeks, there
was a statistically significant increase in median plasma volume compared to
placebo.
Since thiazolidinediones, including rosiglitazone, can cause fluid retention,
which can exacerbate or lead to congestive heart failure, AVANDIA should be
used with caution in patients at risk for heart failure. Patients should be
monitored for signs and symptoms of heart failure [see BOXED
WARNING, WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS, and Patient
Counseling Information].
In controlled clinical trials of patients with type 2 diabetes, mild to moderate
edema was reported in patients treated with AVANDIA, and may be dose related.
Patients with ongoing edema were more likely to have adverse events associated
with edema if started on combination therapy with insulin and AVANDIA [see ADVERSE
REACTIONS].
Weight Gain
Dose-related weight gain was seen with AVANDIA alone and in combination with
other hypoglycemic agents (Table 3). The mechanism of weight gain is unclear
but probably involves a combination of fluid retention and fat accumulation.
In postmarketing experience, there have been reports of unusually rapid increases
in weight and increases in excess of that generally observed in clinical trials.
Patients who experience such increases should be assessed for fluid accumulation
and volume-related events such as excessive edema and congestive heart failure
[see BOXED WARNING].
Table 3. Weight Changes (kg) From Baseline at Endpoint During
Clinical Trials
| Monotherapy |
Duration |
Control Group |
AVANDIA
4 mg
Median
(25th, 75th
percentile) |
AVANDIA
8 mg
Median
(25th, 75th
percentile) |
| |
Median
(25th, 75th
percentile) |
| |
26 weeks |
placebo |
-0.9 (-2.8, 0.9)
n = 210 |
1.0 (-0.9, 3.6)
n = 436 |
3.1 (1.1, 5.8)
n = 439 |
| |
52 weeks |
sulfonylurea |
2.0 (0, 4.0)
n = 173 |
2.0 (-0.6, 4.0)
n = 150 |
2.6 (0, 5.3)
n = 157 |
| Combination therapy |
| Sulfonylurea |
24-26 weeks |
sulfonylurea |
0 (-1.0, 1.3)
n = 1,155 |
2.2 (0.5, 4.0)
n = 613 |
3.5 (1.4, 5.9)
n = 841 |
| Metformin |
26 weeks |
metformin |
-1.4 (-3.2, 0.2)
n = 175 |
0.8 (-1.0, 2.6)
n = 100 |
2.1 (0, 4.3)
n = 184 |
| Insulin |
26 weeks |
insulin |
0.9 (-0.5, 2.7)
n = 162 |
4.1 (1.4, 6.3)
n = 164 |
5.4 (3.4, 7.3)
n = 150 |
| Sulfonylurea + metformin |
26 weeks |
sulfonylurea + metformin |
0.2 (-1.2, 1.6)
n = 272 |
2.5 (0.8, 4.6)
n = 275 |
4.5 (2.4, 7.3)
n = 276 |
In a 4- to 6-year, monotherapy, comparative trial (ADOPT) in patients recently
diagnosed with type 2 diabetes not previously treated with antidiabetic medication
[see Clinical Studies], the median weight
change (25th, 75th percentiles) from baseline at 4 years
was 3.5 kg (0.0, 8.1) for AVANDIA, 2.0 kg (-1.0, 4.8) for glyburide, and -2.4
kg (-5.4, 0.5) for metformin.
In a 24-week study in pediatric patients aged 10 to 17 years treated with AVANDIA
4 to 8 mg daily, a median weight gain of 2.8 kg (25th, 75th
percentiles: 0.0, 5.8) was reported.
Hepatic Effects
Liver enzymes should be measured prior to the initiation of therapy with AVANDIA
in all patients and periodically thereafter per the clinical judgment of the
healthcare professional. Therapy with AVANDIA should not be initiated in patients
with increased baseline liver enzyme levels (ALT > 2.5X upper limit of normal).
Patients with mildly elevated liver enzymes (ALT levels ≤ 2.5X upper limit
of normal) at baseline or during therapy with AVANDIA should be evaluated to
determine the cause of the liver enzyme elevation. Initiation of, or continuation
of, therapy with AVANDIA in patients with mild liver enzyme elevations should
proceed with caution and include close clinical follow-up, including liver enzyme
monitoring, to determine if the liver enzyme elevations resolve or worsen. If
at any time ALT levels increase to > 3X the upper limit of normal in patients
on therapy with AVANDIA, liver enzyme levels should be rechecked as soon as
possible. If ALT levels remain > 3X the upper limit of normal, therapy with
AVANDIA should be discontinued.
If any patient develops symptoms suggesting hepatic dysfunction, which may
include unexplained nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, fatigue, anorexia and/or
dark urine, liver enzymes should be checked. The decision whether to continue
the patient on therapy with AVANDIA should be guided by clinical judgment pending
laboratory evaluations. If jaundice is observed, drug therapy should be discontinued.
[See ADVERSE REACTIONS.]
Macular Edema
Macular edema has been reported in postmarketing experience in some diabetic
patients who were taking AVANDIA or another thiazolidinedione. Some patients
presented with blurred vision or decreased visual acuity, but some patients
appear to have been diagnosed on routine ophthalmologic examination. Most patients
had peripheral edema at the time macular edema was diagnosed. Some patients
had improvement in their macular edema after discontinuation of their thiazolidinedione.
Patients with diabetes should have regular eye exams by an ophthalmologist,
per the Standards of Care of the American Diabetes Association. Additionally,
any diabetic who reports any kind of visual symptom should be promptly referred
to an ophthalmologist, regardless of the patient's underlying medications or
other physical findings. [See ADVERSE REACTIONS.]
Fractures
In a 4- to 6-year comparative study (ADOPT) of glycemic control with monotherapy
in drug-naïve patients recently diagnosed with type 2 diabetes mellitus,
an increased incidence of bone fracture was noted in female patients taking
AVANDIA. Over the 4- to 6-year period, the incidence of bone fracture in females
was 9.3% (60/645) for AVANDIA versus 3.5% (21/605) for glyburide and 5.1% (30/590)
for metformin. This increased incidence was noted after the first year of treatment
and persisted during the course of the study. The majority of the fractures
in the women who received AVANDIA occurred in the upper arm, hand, and foot.
These sites of fracture are different from those usually associated with postmenopausal
osteoporosis (e.g., hip or spine). No increase in fracture rates was observed
in men treated with AVANDIA. The risk of fracture should be considered in the
care of patients, especially female patients, treated with AVANDIA, and attention
given to assessing and maintaining bone health according to current standards
of care.
Hematologic Effects
Decreases in mean hemoglobin and hematocrit occurred in a dose-related fashion
in adult patients treated with AVANDIA [see ADVERSE REACTIONS]. The observed
changes may be related to the increased plasma volume observed with treatment
with AVANDIA.
Diabetes and Blood Glucose Control
Patients receiving AVANDIA in combination with other hypoglycemic agents may
be at risk for hypoglycemia, and a reduction in the dose of the concomitant
agent may be necessary.
Periodic fasting blood glucose and HbA1c measurements should be performed to
monitor therapeutic response.
Ovulation
Therapy with AVANDIA, like other thiazolidinediones, may result in ovulation
in some premenopausal anovulatory women. As a result, these patients may be
at an increased risk for pregnancy while taking AVANDIA [see Use in Specific
Populations]. Thus, adequate contraception in premenopausal women should
be recommended. This possible effect has not been specifically investigated
in clinical studies; therefore, the frequency of this occurrence is not known.
Although hormonal imbalance has been seen in preclinical studies [see Nonclinical
Toxicology], the clinical significance of this finding is not known. If
unexpected menstrual dysfunction occurs, the benefits of continued therapy with
AVANDIA should be reviewed.
Patient Counseling Information
Patient Advice
Patients should be informed of the following:
- AVANDIA is not recommended for patients with symptoms of heart failure.
- Patients with more severe heart failure (NYHA Class 3 or 4) cannot start
AVANDIA as the risks exceed any potential benefits in such patients.
- Results of a set of clinical studies suggest that treatment with AVANDIA
is associated with an increased risk for myocardial ischemic events, such
as angina or myocardial infarction (heart attack), especially in patients
taking insulin or nitrates. Because this risk has not been confirmed or excluded
in different long-term trials, definitive conclusions regarding this risk
await completion of an adequately-designed cardiovascular outcome study.
- AVANDIA is not recommended for patients who are taking nitrates or insulin.
- There are multiple medications available to treat type 2 diabetes. The benefits
and risks of each available diabetes medication should be taken into account
when choosing a particular diabetes medication for a given patient.
- There have been no clinical studies establishing conclusive evidence of
macrovascular risk reduction with AVANDIA or any other oral antidiabetic drug.
- Management of type 2 diabetes should include diet control. Caloric restriction,
weight loss, and exercise are essential for the proper treatment of the diabetic
patient because they help improve insulin sensitivity. This is important not
only in the primary treatment of type 2 diabetes, but in maintaining the efficacy
of drug therapy.
- It is important to adhere to dietary instructions and to regularly have
blood glucose and glycosylated hemoglobin tested. It can take 2 weeks to see
a reduction in blood glucose and 2 to 3 months to see the full effect of AVANDIA.
- Blood will be drawn to check their liver function prior to the start of
therapy and periodically thereafter per the clinical judgment of the healthcare
professional. Patients with unexplained symptoms of nausea, vomiting, abdominal
pain, fatigue, anorexia, or dark urine should immediately report these symptoms
to their physician.
- Patients who experience an unusually rapid increase in weight or edema or
who develop shortness of breath or other symptoms of heart failure while on
AVANDIA should immediately report these symptoms to their physician.
- AVANDIA can be taken with or without meals.
- When using AVANDIA in combination with other hypoglycemic agents, the risk
of hypoglycemia, its symptoms and treatment, and conditions that predispose
to its development should be explained to patients and their family members.
- Therapy with AVANDIA, like other thiazolidinediones, may result in ovulation
in some premenopausal anovulatory women. As a result, these patients may be
at an increased risk for pregnancy while taking AVANDIA. Thus, adequate contraception
in premenopausal women should be recommended. This possible effect has not
been specifically investigated in clinical studies so the frequency of this
occurrence is not known.
Nonclinical Toxicology
Carcinogenesis, Mutagenesis, Impairment of Fertility
Carcinogenesis
A 2-year carcinogenicity study was conducted in Charles River CD-1 mice at
doses of 0.4, 1.5, and 6 mg/kg/day in the diet (highest dose equivalent to approximately
12 times human AUC at the maximum recommended human daily dose). Sprague-Dawley
rats were dosed for 2 years by oral gavage at doses of 0.05, 0.3, and 2 mg/kg/day
(highest dose equivalent to approximately 10 and 20 times human AUC at the maximum
recommended human daily dose for male and female rats, respectively).
Rosiglitazone was not carcinogenic in the mouse. There was an increase in incidence
of adipose hyperplasia in the mouse at doses ≥ 1.5 mg/kg/day (approximately
2 times human AUC at the maximum recommended human daily dose). In rats, there
was a significant increase in the incidence of benign adipose tissue tumors
(lipomas) at doses ≥ 0.3 mg/kg/day (approximately 2 times human AUC at the
maximum recommended human daily dose). These proliferative changes in both species
are considered due to the persistent pharmacological overstimulation of adipose
tissue.
Mutagenesis
Rosiglitazone was not mutagenic or clastogenic in the in vitro bacterial assays
for gene mutation, the in vitro chromosome aberration test in human lymphocytes,
the in vivo mouse micronucleus test, and the in vivo/in vitro rat UDS assay.
There was a small (about 2-fold) increase in mutation in the in vitro mouse
lymphoma assay in the presence of metabolic activation.
Impairment of Fertility
Rosiglitazone had no effects on mating or fertility of male rats given up to
40 mg/kg/day (approximately 116 times human AUC at the maximum recommended human
daily dose). Rosiglitazone altered estrous cyclicity (2 mg/kg/day) and reduced
fertility (40 mg/kg/day) of female rats in association with lower plasma levels
of progesterone and estradiol (approximately 20 and 200 times human AUC at the
maximum recommended human daily dose, respectively). No such effects were noted
at 0.2 mg/kg/day (approximately 3 times human AUC at the maximum recommended
human daily dose). In juvenile rats dosed from 27 days of age through to sexual
maturity (at up to 40 mg/kg/day), there was no effect on male reproductive performance,
or on estrous cyclicity, mating performance or pregnancy incidence in females
(approximately 68 times human AUC at the maximum recommended human daily dose).
In monkeys, rosiglitazone (0.6 and 4.6 mg/kg/day; approximately 3 and 15 times
human AUC at the maximum recommended human daily dose, respectively) diminished
the follicular phase rise in serum estradiol with consequential reduction in
the luteinizing hormone surge, lower luteal phase progesterone levels, and amenorrhea.
The mechanism for these effects appears to be direct inhibition of ovarian steroidogenesis.
Use In Specific Populations
Pregnancy
Pregnancy Category C
All pregnancies have a background risk of birth defects, loss, or other adverse
outcome regardless of drug exposure. This background risk is increased in pregnancies
complicated by hyperglycemia and may be decreased with good metabolic control.
It is essential for patients with diabetes or history of gestational diabetes
to maintain good metabolic control before conception and throughout pregnancy.
Careful monitoring of glucose control is essential in such patients. Most experts
recommend that insulin monotherapy be used during pregnancy to maintain blood
glucose levels as close to normal as possible.
Human Data: Rosiglitazone has been reported to cross the human
placenta and be detectable in fetal tissue. The clinical significance of these
findings is unknown. There are no adequate and well-controlled studies in pregnant
women. AVANDIA should not be used during pregnancy.
Animal Studies: There was no effect on implantation or the embryo
with rosiglitazone treatment during early pregnancy in rats, but treatment during
mid-late gestation was associated with fetal death and growth retardation in
both rats and rabbits. Teratogenicity was not observed at doses up to 3 mg/kg
in rats and 100 mg/kg in rabbits (approximately 20 and 75 times human AUC at
the maximum recommended human daily dose, respectively). Rosiglitazone caused
placental pathology in rats (3 mg/kg/day). Treatment of rats during gestation
through lactation reduced litter size, neonatal viability, and postnatal growth,
with growth retardation reversible after puberty. For effects on the placenta,
embryo/fetus, and offspring, the no-effect dose was 0.2 mg/kg/day in rats and
15 mg/kg/day in rabbits. These no-effect levels are approximately 4 times human
AUC at the maximum recommended human daily dose. Rosiglitazone reduced the number
of uterine implantations and live offspring when juvenile female rats were treated
at 40 mg/kg/day from 27 days of age through to sexual maturity (approximately
68 times human AUC at the maximum recommended daily dose). The no-effect level
was 2 mg/kg/day (approximately 4 times human AUC at the maximum recommended
daily dose). There was no effect on pre- or post-natal survival or growth.
Labor and Delivery
The effect of rosiglitazone on labor and delivery in humans is not known.
Nursing Mothers
Drug-related material was detected in milk from lactating rats. It is not known
whether AVANDIA is excreted in human milk. Because many drugs are excreted in
human milk, AVANDIA should not be administered to a nursing woman.
Pediatric Use
After placebo run-in including diet counseling, children with type 2 diabetes
mellitus, aged 10 to 17 years and with a baseline mean body mass index (BMI)
of 33 kg/m², were randomized to treatment with 2 mg twice daily of AVANDIA
(n = 99) or 500 mg twice daily of metformin (n = 101) in a 24-week, double-blind
clinical trial. As expected, FPG decreased in patients naïve to diabetes
medication (n = 104) and increased in patients withdrawn from prior medication
(usually metformin) (n = 90) during the run-in period. After at least 8 weeks
of treatment, 49% of patients treated with AVANDIA and 55% of metformin-treated
patients had their dose doubled if FPG > 126 mg/dL. For the overall intent-to-treat
population, at week 24, the mean change from baseline in HbA1c was -0.14% with
AVANDIA and -0.49% with metformin. There was an insufficient number of patients
in this study to establish statistically whether these observed mean treatment
effects were similar or different. Treatment effects differed for patients naïve
to therapy with antidiabetic drugs and for patients previously treated with
antidiabetic therapy (Table 6).
Table 6. Week 24 FPG and HbA1c Change From Baseline Last-Observation-Carried
Forward in Children With Baseline HbA1c > 6.5%
| |
Naïve Patients |
Previously-Treated Patients |
Metformin
N = 40 |
Rosiglitazone
N = 45 |
Metformin
N = 43 |
Rosiglitazone
N = 32 |
| FPG (mg/dL) |
| Baseline (mean) |
170 |
165 |
221 |
205 |
| Change from baseline (mean) |
-21 |
-11 |
-33 |
-5 |
| Adjusted treatment difference* (rosiglitazone–metformin)†
(95% CI) |
|
8
(-15, 30) |
|
21
(-9, 51) |
| % of patients with ≥ 30 mg/dL decrease from baseline |
43% |
27% |
44% |
28% |
| HbA1c (%) |
| Baseline (mean) |
8.3 |
8.2 |
8.8 |
8.5 |
| Change from baseline (mean) |
-0.7 |
-0.5 |
-0.4 |
0.1 |
| Adjusted treatment difference* (rosiglitazone–metformin)†
(95% CI) |
|
0.2
(-0.6, 0.9) |
|
0.5
(-0.2, 1.3) |
| % of patients with ≥ 0.7% decrease from baseline |
63% |
52% |
54% |
31% |
* Change from baseline means are
least squares means adjusting for baseline HbA1c, gender, and region.
† Positive values for the difference favor metformin.
|
Treatment differences depended on baseline BMI or weight such that the effects
of AVANDIA and metformin appeared more closely comparable among heavier patients.
The median weight gain was 2.8 kg with rosiglitazone and 0.2 kg with metformin
[see WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS]. Fifty-four percent of patients treated
with rosiglitazone and 32% of patients treated with metformin gained ≥ 2 kg,
and 33% of patients treated with rosiglitazone and 7% of patients treated with
metformin gained ≥ 5 kg on study. Adverse events observed in this study are
described in Adverse Reactions).
Figure 3. Mean HbA1c Over Time in a 24-Week Study of AVANDIA
and Metformin in Pediatric Patients — Drug-Naïve Subgroup
Geriatric Use
Results of the population pharmacokinetic analysis showed that age does not
significantly affect the pharmacokinetics of rosiglitazone [see CLINICAL
PHARMACOLOGY]. Therefore, no dosage adjustments are required for the
elderly. In controlled clinical trials, no overall differences in safety and
effectiveness between older ( ≥ 65 years) and younger ( < 65 years) patients
were observed.
REFERENCES
1. Food and Drug Administration Briefing Document. Joint meeting
of the Endocrinologic and Metabolic Drugs and Drug Safety and Risk Management
Advisory Committees. July 30, 2007.
2. DREAM Trial Investigators. Effect of rosiglitazone on the
frequency of diabetes in patients with impaired glucose tolerance or impaired
fasting glucose: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2006;368:1096-1105.
3. Home PD, Pocock SJ, Beck-Nielsen H, et al. Rosiglitazone
evaluated for cardiovascular outcomes – an interim analysis. NEJM 2007;357:1-11.
Last updated on RxList: 2/6/2009