Pharmacokinetics
Clarithromycin is rapidly absorbed from the gastrointestinal tract after oral
administration. The absolute bioavailability of 250 mg clarithromycin tablets
was approximately 50%. For a single 500 mg dose of clarithromycin, food slightly
delays the onset of clarithromycin absorption, increasing the peak time from
approximately 2 to 2.5 hours. Food also increases the clarithromycin peak plasma
concentration by about 24%, but does not affect the extent of clarithromycin
bioavailability. Food does not affect the onset of formation of the antimicrobially
active metabolite, 14-OH clarithromycin or its peak plasma concentration but
does slightly decrease the extent of metabolite formation, indicated by an 11%
decrease in area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC). Therefore,
BIAXIN tablets may be given without regard to food.
In nonfasting healthy human subjects (males and females), peak plasma concentrations
were attained within 2 to 3 hours after oral dosing. Steady-state peak plasma
clarithromycin concentrations were attained within 3 days and were approximately
1 to 2 μg/mL with a 250 mg dose administered every 12 hours and 3 to 4 μg/mL
with a 500 mg dose administered every 8 to 12 hours. The elimination half-life
of clarithromycin was about 3 to 4 hours with 250 mg administered every 12 hours
but increased to 5 to 7 hours with 500 mg administered every 8 to 12 hours.
The nonlinearity of clarithromycin pharmacokinetics is slight at the recommended
doses of 250 mg and 500 mg administered every 8 to 12 hours. With a 250 mg every
12 hours dosing, the principal metabolite, 14-OH clarithromycin, attains a peak
steady-state concentration of about 0.6 μg/mL and has an elimination half-life
of 5 to 6 hours. With a 500 mg every 8 to 12 hours dosing, the peak steady-state
concentration of 14-OH clarithromycin is slightly higher (up to 1 μg/mL),
and its elimination half-life is about 7 to 9 hours. With any of these dosing
regimens, the steady-state concentration of this metabolite is generally attained
within 3 to 4 days.
After a 250 mg tablet every 12 hours, approximately 20% of the dose is excreted
in the urine as clarithromycin, while after a 500 mg tablet every 12 hours,
the urinary excretion of clarithromycin is somewhat greater, approximately 30%.
In comparison, after an oral dose of 250 mg (125 mg/5 mL) suspension every 12
hours, approximately 40% is excreted in urine as clarithromycin. The renal clearance
of clarithromycin is, however, relatively independent of the dose size and approximates
the normal glomerular filtration rate. The major metabolite found in urine is
14-OH clarithromycin, which accounts for an additional 10% to 15% of the dose
with either a 250 mg or a 500 mg tablet administered every 12 hours.
Steady-state concentrations of clarithromycin and 14-OH clarithromycin observed
following administration of 500 mg doses of clarithromycin every 12 hours to
adult patients with HIV infection were similar to those observed in healthy
volunteers. In adult HIV-infected patients taking 500- or 1000-mg doses of clarithromycin
every 12 hours, steady-state clarithromycin Cmax values ranged from 2 to 4 μg/mL
and 5 to 10 μg/mL, respectively.
The steady-state concentrations of clarithromycin in subjects with impaired
hepatic function did not differ from those in normal subjects; however, the
14-OH clarithromycin concentrations were lower in the hepatically impaired subjects.
The decreased formation of 14-OH clarithromycin was at least partially offset
by an increase in renal clearance of clarithromycin in the subjects with impaired
hepatic function when compared to healthy subjects.
The pharmacokinetics of clarithromycin was also altered in subjects with impaired
renal function. (See PRECAUTIONS and DOSAGE
AND ADMINISTRATION.)
Clarithromycin and the 14-OH clarithromycin metabolite distribute readily into
body tissues and fluids. There are no data available on cerebrospinal fluid
penetration. Because of high intracellular concentrations, tissue concentrations
are higher than serum concentrations. Examples of tissue and serum concentrations
are presented below.
CONCENTRATION (after 250 mg q12h)
| Tissue Type |
Tissue (μg/g) |
Serum (μg/mL) |
| Tonsil |
1.6 |
0.8 |
| Lung |
8.8 |
1.7 |
Clarithromycin extended-release tablets provide extended absorption of clarithromycin
from the gastrointestinal tract after oral administration. Relative to an equal
total daily dose of immediaterelease clarithromycin tablets, clarithromycin
extended-release tablets provide lower and later steadystate peak plasma concentrations
but equivalent 24-hour AUC's for both clarithromycin and its microbiologically-active
metabolite, 14-OH clarithromycin. While the extent of formation of 14-OH clarithromycin
following administration of BIAXIN XL tablets (2 x 500 mg once daily) is not
affected by food, administration under fasting conditions is associated with
approximately 30% lower clarithromycin AUC relative to administration with food.
Therefore, BIAXIN XL tablets should be taken with food.
Steady - State Clarithromycin Plasma Concentration-Time Profiles
In healthy human subjects, steady-state peak plasma clarithromycin concentrations
of approximately 2 to 3 μg/mL were achieved about 5 to 8 hours after oral
administration of 2 x 500 mg BIAXIN XL tablets once daily; for 14-OH clarithromycin,
steady-state peak plasma concentrations of approximately 0.8 μg/mL were attained
about 6 to 9 hours after dosing. Steady-state peak plasma clarithromycin concentrations
of approximately 1 to 2 μg/mL were achieved about 5 to 6 hours after oral
administration of a single 500 mg BIAXIN XL tablet once daily; for 14-OH clarithromycin,
steadystate peak plasma concentrations of approximately 0.6 μg/mL were attained
about 6 hours after dosing.
When 250 mg doses of clarithromycin as BIAXIN suspension were administered
to fasting healthy adult subjects, peak plasma concentrations were attained
around 3 hours after dosing. Steady-state peak plasma concentrations were attained
in 2 to 3 days and were approximately 2 μg/mL for clarithromycin and 0.7
μg/mL for 14-OH clarithromycin when 250-mg doses of the clarithromycin suspension
were administered every 12 hours. Elimination half-life of clarithromycin (3
to 4 hours) and that of 14-OH clarithromycin (5 to 7 hours) were similar to
those observed at steady state following administration of equivalent doses
of BIAXIN tablets.
For adult patients, the bioavailability of 10 mL of the 125 mg/5 mL suspension
or 10 mL of the 250 mg/5 mL suspension is similar to a 250 mg or 500 mg tablet,
respectively.
In children requiring antibiotic therapy, administration of 7.5 mg/kg q12h
doses of clarithromycin as the suspension generally resulted in steady-state
peak plasma concentrations of 3 to 7 μg/mL for clarithromycin and 1 to 2
μg/mL for 14-OH clarithromycin. In HIV-infected children taking 15 mg/kg
every 12 hours, steady-state clarithromycin peak concentrations generally ranged
from 6 to 15 μg/mL.
Clarithromycin penetrates into the middle ear fluid of children with secretory
otitis media.
CONCENTRATION (after 7.5 mg/kg q12h for 5 doses)
| Analyte |
Middle Ear
(μg/mL) |
Fluid Serum
(μg/mL) |
| Clarithromycin |
2.5 |
1.7 |
| 14-OH Clarithromycin |
1.3 |
0.8 |
In adults given 250 mg clarithromycin as suspension (n = 22), food appeared
to decrease mean peak plasma clarithromycin concentrations from 1.2 (±
0.4) μg/mL to 1.0 (± 0.4) μg/mL and the extent of absorption from
7.2 (± 2.5) hr•μg/mL to 6.5 (± 3.7) hr•μg/mL.
When children (n = 10) were administered a single oral dose of 7.5 mg/kg suspension,
food increased mean peak plasma clarithromycin concentrations from 3.6 (±
1.5) μg/mL to 4.6 (± 2.8) μg/mL and the extent of absorption from
10.0 (± 5.5) hr.μg/mL to 14.2 (± 9.4) hr.μg/mL.
Clarithromycin 500 mg every 8 hours was given in combination with omeprazole
40 mg daily to healthy adult males. The plasma levels of clarithromycin and
14-hydroxy-clarithromycin were increased by the concomitant administration of
omeprazole. For clarithromycin, the mean Cmax was 10% greater, the mean Cmin
was 27% greater, and the mean AUC0-8 was 15% greater when clarithromycin was
administered with omeprazole than when clarithromycin was administered alone.
Similar results were seen for 14-hydroxy-clarithromycin, the mean Cmax was 45%
greater, the mean Cmin was 57% greater, and the mean AUC0-8 was 45% greater.
Clarithromycin concentrations in the gastric tissue and mucus were also increased
by concomitant administration of omeprazole.
Clarithromycin Tissue Concentrations 2 hours after Dose (μg/mL)/(μg/g)
| Treatment |
N |
antrum |
fundus |
N |
mucus |
| Clarithromycin |
5 |
10.48 ± 2.01 |
20.81 ± 7.64 |
4 |
4.15 ± 7.74 |
| Clarithromycin + Omeprazole |
5 |
19.96 ± 4.71 |
24.25 ± 6.37 |
4 |
39.29 ± 32.79 |
For information about other drugs indicated in combination with BIAXIN, refer
to the CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY section of their package inserts.
Microbiology
Clarithromycin exerts its antibacterial action by binding to the 50S ribosomal
subunit of susceptible microorganisms resulting in inhibition of protein synthesis.
Clarithromycin is active in vitro against a variety of aerobic and anaerobic
gram-positive and gramnegative microorganisms as well as most Mycobacterium
avium complex (MAC) microorganisms.
Additionally, the 14-OH clarithromycin metabolite also has clinically significant
antimicrobial activity. The 14-OH clarithromycin is twice as active against
Haemophilus influenzae microorganisms as the parent compound. However,
for Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) isolates the 14-OH metabolite is
4 to 7 times less active than clarithromycin. The clinical significance of this
activity against Mycobacterium avium complex is unknown.
Clarithromycin has been shown to be active against most strains of the following
microorganisms both in vitro and in clinical infections as described in the
INDICATIONS AND USAGE section:
Aerobic Gram-positive Microorganisms
Staphylococcus aureus
Streptococcus pneumoniae
Streptococcus pyogenes
Aerobic Gram-negative Microorganisms
Haemophilus influenzae
Haemophilus parainfluenzae
Moraxella catarrhalis
Other Microorganisms
Mycoplasma pneumoniae
Chlamydia pneumoniae (TWAR)
Mycobacteria
Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) consisting of:
Mycobacterium avium
Mycobacterium intracellulare
Beta-lactamase production should have no effect on clarithromycin activity.
NOTE: Most strains of methicillin-resistant and oxacillin-resistant
staphylococci are resistant to clarithromycin.
Omeprazole/clarithromycin dual therapy; ranitidine bismuth citrate/clarithromycin
dual therapy; omeprazole/clarithromycin/amoxicillin triple therapy; and lansoprazole/clarithromycin/amoxicillin
triple therapy have been shown to be active against most strains of Helicobacter
pylori in vitro and in clinical infections as described in the INDICATIONS AND
USAGE section.
Helicobacter
Helicobacter pylori
Pretreatment Resistance
Clarithromycin pretreatment resistance rates were 3.5% (4/113) in the omeprazole/clarithromycin
dual therapy studies (M93-067, M93-100) and 9.3% (41/439) in the omeprazole/clarithromycin/amoxicillin
triple therapy studies (126, 127, M96-446). Clarithromycin pretreatment resistance
was 12.6% (44/348) in the ranitidine bismuth citrate/clarithromycin b.i.d. versus
t.i.d. clinical study (H2BA3001). Clarithromycin pretreatment resistance rates
were 9.5% (91/960) by E-test and 11.3% (12/106) by agar dilution in the lansoprazole/clarithromycin/amoxicillin
triple therapy clinical trials (M93-125, M93-130, M93-131, M95-392, and M95-399).
Amoxicillin pretreatment susceptible isolates ( < 0.25 μg/mL) were found
in 99.3% (436/439) of the patients in the omeprazole/clarithromycin/amoxicillin
clinical studies (126, 127, M96-446). Amoxicillin pretreatment minimum inhibitory
concentrations (MICs) > 0.25 μg/mL occurred in 0.7% (3/439) of the patients,
all of whom were in the clarithromycin/amoxicillin study arm. Amoxicillin pretreatment
susceptible isolates ( < 0.25 μg/mL) occurred in 97.8% (936/957) and 98.0%
(98/100) of the patients in the lansoprazole/clarithromycin/amoxicillin triple-therapy
clinical trials by E-test and agar dilution, respectively. Twenty-one of the
957 patients (2.2%) by E-test and 2 of 100 patients (2.0%) by agar dilution
had amoxicillin pretreatment MICs of > 0.25 μg/mL. Two patients had an
unconfirmed pretreatment amoxicillin minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC)
of > 256 μg/mL by E-test.
Clarithromycin Susceptibility Test Results and Clinical/Bacteriological
Outcomesa
| Clarithromycin Pretreatment Results |
Clarithromycin Post-treatment Results |
| H. pylori negative
- eradicated |
H. pylori positive - not eradicated
Post-treatment susceptibility results |
| Sb |
Ib |
Rb |
No MIC |
| Omeprazole 40 mg q.d./clarithromycin 500 mg t.i.d. for
14 days followed by omeprazole 20 mg q.d. for another 14 days (M93-067,
M93-100) |
| Susceptibleb |
108 |
72 |
1 |
|
26 |
9 |
| Intermediateb |
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
| Resistantb |
4 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
| Ranitidine bismuth citrate 400 mg b.i.d./clarithromycin
500 mg t.i.d. for 14 days followed by ranitidine bismuth citrate 400 mg
b.i.d. for another 14 days (H2BA3001) |
| Susceptibleb |
124 |
98 |
4 |
|
14 |
8 |
| Intermediateb |
3 |
2 |
|
|
|
1 |
| Resistantb |
17 |
1 |
|
|
15 |
1 |
| Ranitidine bismuth citrate 400 mg b.i.d./clarithromycin
500 mg b.i.d. for 14 days followed by ranitidine bismuth citrate
400 mg b.i.d. for another 14 days (H2BA3001) |
| Susceptible |
125 |
106 |
1 |
1 |
12 |
5 |
| Intermediateb |
2 |
2 |
|
|
|
|
| Resistantb |
20 |
1 |
|
|
19 |
|
| Omeprazole 20 mg b.i.d./clarithromycin 500 mg b.i.d./amoxicillin
1 g b.i.d. for 10 days (126, 127, M96-446) |
| Susceptibleb |
171 |
153 |
7 |
|
3 |
8 |
| Intermediateb |
14 |
4 |
1 |
|
6 |
3 |
| Resistantb |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Lansoprazole 30 mg b.i.d./clarithromycin 500 mg b.i.d./amoxicillin
1 g b.i.d. for 14 days (M95-399, M93-131, M95-392) |
| Susceptibleb |
112 |
105 |
|
|
|
7 |
| Intermediateb |
3 |
3 |
|
|
|
|
| Resistantb |
17 |
6 |
|
|
7 |
4 |
| Lansoprazole 30 mg b.i.d./clarithromycin 500 mg b.i.d./amoxicillin
1 g b.i.d. for 10 days (M95-399) |
| Susceptibleb |
42 |
40 |
1 |
|
1 |
|
| Intermediateb |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Resistantb |
4 |
1 |
|
|
3 |
|
a Includes only patients with
pretreatment clarithromycin susceptibility tests
b Susceptible (S) MIC < 0.25 μg/mL, Intermediate (I)
MIC 0.5-1.0 μg/mL, Resistant (R) MIC > 2 μg/mL |
Patients not eradicated of H. pylori following omeprazole/clarithromycin,
ranitidine bismuth citrate/clarithromycin, omeprazole/clarithromycin/amoxicillin,
or lansoprazole/clarithromycin/amoxicillin therapy would likely have clarithromycin
resistant H. pylori isolates. Therefore, for patients who fail therapy,
clarithromycin susceptibility testing should be done, if possible. Patients
with clarithromycin resistant H. pylori should not be treated with any
of the following: omeprazole/clarithromycin dual therapy; ranitidine bismuth
citrate/clarithromycin dual therapy; omeprazole/clarithromycin/amoxicillin triple
therapy; lansoprazole/clarithromycin/amoxicillin triple therapy; or other regimens
which include clarithromycin as the sole antimicrobial agent.
Amoxicillin Susceptibility Test Results and Clinical/Bacteriological Outcomes
In the omeprazole/clarithromycin/amoxicillin triple-therapy clinical trials,
84.9% (157/185) of the patients who had pretreatment amoxicillin susceptible
MICs ( < 0.25 μg/mL) were eradicated of H. pylori and 15.1% (28/185)
failed therapy. Of the 28 patients who failed triple therapy, 11 had no posttreatment
susceptibility test results, and 17 had post-treatment H. pylori isolates
with amoxicillin susceptible MICs. Eleven of the patients who failed triple
therapy also had post-treatment H. pylori isolates with clarithromycin
resistant MICs.
In the lansoprazole/clarithromycin/amoxicillin triple-therapy clinical trials,
82.6% (195/236) of the patients that had pretreatment amoxicillin susceptible
MICs ( < 0.25 μg/mL) were eradicated of H. pylori. Of those with
pretreatment amoxicillin MICs of > 0.25 μg/mL, three of six had the H.
pylori eradicated. A total of 12.8% (22/172) of the patients failed the
10- and 14-day triple-therapy regimens. Post-treatment susceptibility results
were not obtained on 11 of the patients who failed therapy. Nine of the 11 patients
with amoxicillin post-treatment MICs that failed the triple-therapy regimen
also had clarithromycin resistant H. pylori isolates.
The following in vitro data are available,but their clinical significance
is unknown. Clarithromycin exhibits in vitro activity against most
strains of the following microorganisms; however, the safety and effectiveness
of clarithromycin in treating clinical infections due to these microorganisms
have not been established in adequate and well-controlled clinical trials.
Aerobic Gram-positive Microorganisms
Streptococcus agalactiae
Streptococci (Groups C, F, G)
Viridans group streptococci
Aerobic Gram-negative Microorganisms
Bordetella pertussis
Legionella pneumophila
Pasteurella multocida
Anaerobic Gram-positive Microorganisms
Clostridium perfringens
Peptococcus niger
Propionibacterium acnes
Anaerobic Gram-negative Microorganisms
Prevotella melaninogenica (formerly Bacteriodes melaninogenicus)
Susceptibility Testing Excluding Mycobacteria and Helicobacter
Dilution Techniques
Quantitative methods are used to determine antimicrobial minimum inhibitory
concentrations (MICs). These MICs provide estimates of the susceptibility of
bacteria to antimicrobial compounds. The MICs should be determined using a standardized
procedure. Standardized procedures are based on a dilution method1
(broth or agar) or equivalent with standardized inoculum concentrations and
standardized concentrations of clarithromycin powder. The MIC values should
be interpreted according to the following criteria:
For testing Staphylococcus spp.
| MIC (μg/mL) |
Interpretation |
| ≤ 2.0 |
Susceptible (S) |
| 4.0 |
Intermediate (I) |
| ≥ 8.0 |
Resistant (R) |
For testing Streptococcus spp. including Streptococcus pneumoniae
a
| MIC (μg/mL) |
Interpretation |
| ≤ 0.25 |
Susceptible (S) |
| 0.5 |
Intermediate (I) |
| ≥ 1.0 |
Resistant (R) |
| a These interpretive standards are applicable
only to broth microdilution susceptibility tests using cationadjusted
Mueller-Hinton broth with 2-5% lysed horse blood. |
For testing Haemophilus spp.b
| MIC (μg/mL) |
Interpretation |
| ≤ 8.0 |
Susceptible (S) |
| 16.0 |
Intermediate (I) |
| ≥ 32.0 |
Resistant (R) |
b These interpretive standards are applicable
only to broth microdilution susceptibility tests with Haemophilus spp.
using Haemophilus Testing Medium (HTM).1
Note: When testing Streptococcus spp., including Streptococcus pneumoniae,
susceptibility and resistance to clarithromycin can be predicted using
erythromycin. |
A report of “Susceptible” indicates that the pathogen is likely
to be inhibited if the antimicrobial compound in the blood reaches the concentrations
usually achievable. A report of “Intermediate” indicates that the
result should be considered equivocal, and, if the microorganism is not fully
susceptible to alternative, clinically feasible drugs, the test should be repeated.
This category implies possible clinical applicability in body sites where the
drug is physiologically concentrated or in situations where high dosage of drug
can be used. This category also provides a buffer zone which prevents small
uncontrolled technical factors from causing major discrepancies in interpretation.
A report of “Resistant” indicates that the pathogen is not likely
to be inhibited if the antimicrobial compound in the blood reaches the concentrations
usually achievable; other therapy should be selected.
Standardized susceptibility test procedures require the use of laboratory control
microorganisms to control the technical aspects of the laboratory procedures.
Standard clarithromycin powder should provide the following MIC values:
| Microorganism |
|
MIC (μg/mL) |
| S. aureus |
ATCC 29213 |
0.12 to 0.5 |
| S. pneumoniaec |
ATCC 49619 |
0.03 to 0.12 |
| Haemophilus influenzaed |
ATCC 49247 |
4 to 16 |
c This quality control range is applicable
only to S. pneumoniae ATCC 49619 tested by a microdilution procedure using
cation-adjusted Mueller-Hinton broth with 2-5% lysed horse blood.
d This quality control range is applicable only to H. influenzae ATCC
49247 tested by a microdilution procedure using HTM1. |
Diffusion Techniques
Quantitative methods that require measurement of zone diameters also provide
reproducible estimates of the susceptibility of bacteria to antimicrobial compounds.
One such standardized procedure2 requires the use of standardized
inoculum concentrations. This procedure uses paper disks impregnated with 15-μg
clarithromycin to test the susceptibility of microorganisms to clarithromycin.
Reports from the laboratory providing results of the standard single-disk susceptibility
test with a 15- μg clarithromycin disk should be interpreted according to
the following criteria:
For testing Staphylococcus spp.
| Zone diameter (mm) |
Interpretation |
| ≥ 18 |
Susceptible (S) |
| 14 to 17 |
Intermediate (I) |
| ≤ 13 |
Resistant (R) |
For testing Streptococcus spp. including Streptococcus pneumoniaee
| Zone diameter (mm) |
Interpretation |
| ≥ 21 |
Susceptible (S) |
| 17 to 20 |
Intermediate (I) |
| ≤ 16 |
Resistant (R) |
| e These zone diameter standards only apply
to tests performed using Mueller-Hinton agar supplemented with 5% sheep
blood incubated in 5% CO2. |
For testing Haemophilus spp.f
| Zone diameter (mm) |
Interpretation |
| ≥ 13 |
Susceptible (S) |
| 11 to 12 |
Intermediate (I) |
| ≤ 10 |
Resistant (R) |
f These zone diameter standards are applicable
only to tests with Haemophilus spp. using HTm².
Note: When testing Streptococcus spp., including Streptococcus pneumoniae,
susceptibility and resistance to clarithromycin can be predicted using
erythromycin. |
Interpretation should be as stated above for results using dilution techniques.
Interpretation involves correlation of the diameter obtained in the disk test
with the MIC for clarithromycin.
As with standardized dilution techniques, diffusion methods require the use
of laboratory control microorganisms that are used to control the technical
aspects of the laboratory procedures. For the diffusion technique, the 15-μg
clarithromycin disk should provide the following zone diameters in this laboratory
test quality control strain:
| Microorganism |
|
Zone diameter (mm) |
| S. aureus |
ATCC 25923 |
26 to 32 |
| S. pneumoniaeg |
ATCC 49619 |
25 to 31 |
| Haemophilus influenzaeh |
ATCC 49247 |
11 to 17 |
g This quality control range is applicable
only to tests performed by disk diffusion using Mueller-Hinton agar supplemented
with 5% defibrinated sheep blood.
h This quality control limit applies to tests conducted with Haemophilus
influenzae ATCC 49247 using HTM2. |
In vitro Activity of Clarithromycin against Mycobacteria
Clarithromycin has demonstrated in vitro activity against Mycobacterium
avium complex (MAC) microorganisms isolated from both AIDS and non-AIDS
patients. While gene probe techniques may be used to distinguish M. avium
species from M. intracellulare, many studies only reported results on
M. avium complex (MAC) isolates.
Various in vitro methodologies employing broth or solid media at different
pH's, with and without oleic acid-albumin-dextrose-catalase (OADC), have been
used to determine clarithromycin MIC values for mycobacterial species. In general,
MIC values decrease more than 16-fold as the pH of Middlebrook 7H12 broth media
increases from 5.0 to 7.4. At pH 7.4, MIC values determined with Mueller-Hinton
agar were 4- to 8-fold higher than those observed with Middlebrook 7H12 media.
Utilization of oleic acid-albumin-dextrose-catalase (OADC) in these assays has
been shown to further alter MIC values.
Clarithromycin activity against 80 MAC isolates from AIDS patients and 211
MAC isolates from non- AIDS patients was evaluated using a microdilution method
with Middlebrook 7H9 broth. Results showed an MIC value of ≤ 4.0 μg/mL
in 81% and 89% of the AIDS and non-AIDS MAC isolates, respectively. Twelve percent
of the non-AIDS isolates had an MIC value ≤ 0.5 μg/mL. Clarithromycin was
also shown to be active against phagocytized M. avium complex (MAC) in
mouse and human macrophage cell cultures as well as in the beige mouse infection
model.
Clarithromycin activity was evaluated against Mycobacterium tuberculosis microorganisms.
In one study utilizing the agar dilution method with Middlebrook 7H10 media,
3 of 30 clinical isolates had an MIC of 2.5 μg/mL. Clarithromycin inhibited
all isolates at > 10.0 μg/mL.
Susceptibility Testing for Mycobacterium avium Complex (MAC)
The disk diffusion and dilution techniques for susceptibility testing against
gram-positive and gramnegative bacteria should not be used for determining clarithromycin
MIC values against mycobacteria. In vitro susceptibility testing methods
and diagnostic products currently available for determining minimum inhibitory
concentration (MIC) values against Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC)
organisms have not been standardized or validated. Clarithromycin MIC values
will vary depending on the susceptibility testing method employed, composition
and pH of the media, and the utilization of nutritional supplements. Breakpoints
to determine whether clinical isolates of M. avium or M. intracellulare
are susceptible or resistant to clarithromycin have not been established.
Susceptibility Test for Helicobacter pylori
The reference methodology for susceptibility testing of H. pylori is agar dilution
MICs.3 One to three microliters of an inoculum equivalent to a No.
2 McFarland standard (1 x 107-1 x 108 CFU/mL for H.
pylori ) are inoculated directly onto freshly prepared antimicrobial containing
Mueller-Hinton agar plates with 5% aged defibrinated sheep blood ( > 2-weeks
old). The agar dilution plates are incubated at 35°C in a microaerobic environment
produced by a gas generating system suitable for Campylobacter species.
After 3 days of incubation, the MICs are recorded as the lowest concentration
of antimicrobial agent required to inhibit growth of the organism. The clarithromycin
and amoxicillin MIC values should be interpreted according to the following
criteria:
| Clarithromycin MIC (μg/mL) i |
Interpretation |
| < 0.25 |
Susceptible (S) |
| 0.5-1.0 |
Intermediate (I) |
| > 2.0 |
Resistant (R) |
| Amoxicillin MIC (μg/mL) i,j |
Interpretation |
| < 0.25 |
Susceptible (S) |
i These are tentative breakpoints for the
agar dilution methodology, and they should not be used to interpret results
obtained using alternative methods.
j There were not enough organisms with MICs > 0.25 μg/mL to determine
a resistance breakpoint. |
Standardized susceptibility test procedures require the use of laboratory control
microorganisms to control the technical aspects of the laboratory procedures.
Standard clarithromycin and amoxicillin powders should provide the following
MIC values:
| Microorganisms |
|
Antimicrobial Agent |
MIC (μg/mL)k |
| H. pylori |
ATCC 43504 |
Clarithromycin |
0.015-0.12 μg/mL |
| H. pylori |
ATCC 43504 |
Amoxicillin |
0.015-0.12 μg/mL |
| k These are quality control ranges for the agar
dilution methodology and they should not be used to control test results
obtained using alternative methods. |
Clinical Studies
Mycobacterial Infections
Prophylaxis
A randomized, double-blind study (561) compared clarithromycin 500 mg b.i.d.
to placebo in patients with CDC-defined AIDS and CD4 counts <
100 cells/μL. This study accrued 682 patients from November 1992 to January
1994, with a median CD4 cell count at study entry of 30 cells/μL.
Median duration of clarithromycin was 10.6 months vs. 8.2 months for placebo.
More patients in the placebo arm than the clarithromycin arm discontinued prematurely
from the study (75.6% and 67.4%, respectively). However, if premature discontinuations
due to MAC or death are excluded, approximately equal percentages of patients
on each arm (54.8% on clarithromycin and 52.5% on placebo) discontinued study
drug early for other reasons. The study was designed to evaluate the following
endpoints:
- MAC bacteremia, defined as at least one positive culture for M. avium complex
bacteria from blood or another normally sterile site.
- Survival.
- Clinically significant disseminated MAC disease, defined as MAC bacteremia
accompanied by signs or symptoms of serious MAC infection, including fever,
night sweats, weight loss, anemia, or elevations in liver function tests.
MAC Bacteremia
In patients randomized to clarithromycin, the risk of MAC bacteremia was reduced
by 69% compared to placebo. The difference between groups was statistically
significant (p < 0.001). On an intent-totreat basis, the one-year cumulative
incidence of MAC bacteremia was 5.0% for patients randomized to clarithromycin
and 19.4% for patients randomized to placebo. While only 19 of the 341 patients
randomized to clarithromycin developed MAC, 11 of these cases were resistant
to clarithromycin. The patients with resistant MAC bacteremia had a median baseline
CD4 count of 10 cells/mm³ (range 2 to 25 cells/mm³). Information regarding
the clinical course and response to treatment of the patients with resistant
MAC bacteremia is limited. The 8 patients who received clarithromycin and developed
susceptible MAC bacteremia had a median baseline CD4 count of 25 cells/mm³
(range 10 to 80 cells/mm³). Comparatively, 53 of the 341 placebo patients
developed MAC; none of these isolates were resistant to clarithromycin. The
median baseline CD4 count was 15 cells/mm³ (range 2 to 130 cells/mm³)
for placebo patients that developed MAC.
Survival
A statistically significant survival benefit was observed.
Survival All Randomized Patients
| |
Mortality |
Reduction in Mortality on Clarithromycin |
| Placebo |
Clarithromycin |
| 6 month |
9.4% |
6.5% |
31% |
| 12 month |
29.7% |
20.5% |
31% |
| 18 month |
46.4% |
37.5% |
20% |
Since the analysis at 18 months includes patients no longer receiving prophylaxis
the survival benefit of clarithromycin may be underestimated.
Clinically Significant Disseminated MAC Disease
In association with the decreased incidence of bacteremia, patients in the
group randomized to clarithromycin showed reductions in the signs and symptoms
of disseminated MAC disease, including fever, night sweats, weight loss, and
anemia.
Safety
In AIDS patients treated with clarithromycin over long periods of time for
prophylaxis against M. avium, it was often difficult to distinguish adverse
events possibly associated with clarithromycin administration from underlying
HIV disease or intercurrent illness. Median duration of treatment was 10.6 months
for the clarithromycin group and 8.2 months for the placebo group.
Treatment-related* Adverse Event Incidence Rates (%) in Immunocompromised
Adult Patients Receiving Prophylaxis Against M. avium Complex
Body System‡
Adverse Event |
Clarithromycin
(n = 339)% |
Placebo
(n = 339)% |
| Body as a Whole |
| Abdominal pain |
5.0% |
3.5% |
| Headache |
2.7% |
0.9% |
| Digestive |
| Diarrhea |
7.7% |
4.1% |
| Dyspepsia |
3.8% |
2.7% |
| Flatulence |
2.4% |
0.9% |
| Nausea |
11.2% |
7.1% |
| Vomiting |
5.9% |
3.2% |
| Skin & Appendages |
| Rash |
3.2% |
3.5% |
| Special Senses |
| Taste Perversion |
8.0% |
0.3% |
* Includes those events possibly or probably
related to study drug and excludes concurrent conditions.
‡ > 2% Adverse Event Incidence Rates for either treatment group. |
Among these events, taste perversion was the only event that had significantly
higher incidence in the clarithromycin-treated group compared to the placebo-treated
group.
Discontinuation due to adverse events was required in 18% of patients receiving
clarithromycin compared to 17% of patients receiving placebo in this trial.
Primary reasons for discontinuation in clarithromycin treated patients include
headache, nausea, vomiting, depression and taste perversion.
Changes in Laboratory Values of Potential Clinical Importance
In immunocompromised patients receiving prophylaxis against M. avium, evaluations
of laboratory values were made by analyzing those values outside the seriously
abnormal value (i.e., the extreme high or low limit) for the specified test.
Percentage of Patients(a) Exceeding Extreme Laboratory
Value in Patients Receiving Prophylaxis Against M. avium Complex
| |
|
Clarithromycin 500 mg b.i.d. |
Placebo |
| Hemoglobin |
< 8 g/dL |
4/118 3% |
5/103 5% |
| Platelet Count |
< 50 x 109/L |
11/249 4% |
12/250 5% |
| WBC Count |
< 1 x 109/L |
2/103 4% |
0/95 0% |
| SGOT |
> 5 x ULN(b) |
7/196 4% |
5/208 2% |
| SGPT |
> 5 x ULN(b) |
6/217 3% |
4/232 2% |
| Alk. Phos. |
> 5 x ULN(b) |
5/220 2% |
5/218 2% |
(a) Includes only patients with baseline
values within the normal range or borderline high (hematology variables)
and within the normal range or borderline low (chemistry variables).
(b) ULN = Upper Limit of Normal |
Treatment
Three randomized studies (500, 577, and 521) compared different dosages of
clarithromycin in patients with CDC-defined AIDS and CD4 counts <
100 cells/μL. These studies accrued patients from May 1991 to March 1992.
Study 500 was randomized, double-blind; Study 577 was open-label compassionate
use. Both studies used 500 and 1000 mg b.i.d. doses; Study 500 also had a 2000
mg b.i.d. group. Study 521 was a pediatric study at 3.75, 7.5, and 15 mg/kg
b.i.d. Study 500 enrolled 154 adult patients, Study 577 enrolled 469 adult patients,
and Study 521 enrolled 25 patients between the ages of 1 to 20. The majority
of patients had CD4 cell counts < 50/μL at study entry. The
studies were designed to evaluate the following end points:
- Change in MAC bacteremia or blood cultures negative for M. avium.
- Change in clinical signs and symptoms of MAC infection including one or
more of the following: fever, night sweats, weight loss, diarrhea, splenomegaly,
and hepatomegaly.
The results for the 500 study are described below. The 577 study results were
similar to the results of the 500 study. Results with the 7.5 mg/kg b.i.d. dose
in the pediatric study were comparable to those for the 500 mg b.i.d. regimen
in the adult studies.
Study 069 compared the safety and efficacy of clarithromycin in combination
with ethambutol versus clarithromycin in combination with ethambutol and clofazimine
for the treatment of disseminated MAC (dMAC) infection.4 This 24-week
study enrolled 106 patients with AIDS and dMAC, with 55 patients randomized
to receive clarithromycin and ethambutol, and 51 patients randomized to receive
clarithromycin, ethambutol, and clofazimine. Baseline characteristics between
study arms were similar with the exception of median CFU counts being at least
1 log higher in the clarithromycin, ethambutol, and clofazimine arm.
Compared to prior experience with clarithromycin monotherapy, the two-drug
regimen of clarithromycin and ethambutol was well tolerated and extended the
time to microbiologic relapse, largely through suppressing the emergence of
clarithromycin resistant strains. However, the addition of clofazimine to the
regimen added no additional microbiologic or clinical benefit. Tolerability
of both multidrug regimens was comparable with the most common adverse events
being gastrointestinal in nature. Patients receiving the clofazimine-containing
regimen had reduced survival rates; however, their baseline mycobacterial colony
counts were higher. The results of this trial support the addition of ethambutol
to clarithromycin for the treatment of initial dMAC infections but do not support
adding clofazimine as a third agent.
MAC Bacteremia
Decreases in MAC bacteremia or negative blood cultures were seen in the majority
of patients in all dose groups. Mean reductions in colony forming units (CFU)
are shown below. Included in the table are results from a separate study with
a four drug regimen5 (ciprofloxacin, ethambutol, rifampicin, and clofazimine).
Since patient populations and study procedures may vary between these two studies,
comparisons between the clarithromycin results and the combination therapy results
should be interpreted cautiously.
Mean Reductions in Log CFU from Baseline (After 4 Weeks of
Therapy)
500 mg b.i.d.
(N = 35) |
1000 mg b.i.d.
(N = 32) |
2000 mg b.i.d.
(N = 26) |
Four Drug Regimen
(N = 24) |
| 1.5 |
2.3 |
2.3 |
1.4 |
Although the 1000 mg and 2000 mg b.i.d. doses showed significantly better control
of bacteremia during the first four weeks of therapy, no significant differences
were seen beyond that point. The percent of patients whose blood was sterilized
as shown by one or more negative cultures at any time during acute therapy was
61% (30/49) for the 500 mg b.i.d. group and 59% (29/49) and 52% (25/48) for
the 1000 and 2000 mg b.i.d. groups, respectively. The percent of patients who
had 2 or more negative cultures during acute therapy that were sustained through
study Day 84 was 25% (12/49) in both the 500 and 1000 mg b.i.d. groups and 8%
(4/48) for the 2000 mg b.i.d. group. By Day 84, 23% (11/49), 37% (18/49), and
56% (27/48) of patients had died or discontinued from the study, and 14% (7/49),
12% (6/49), and 13% (6/48) of patients had relapsed in the 500, 1000, and 2000
mg b.i.d. dose groups, respectively. All of the isolates had an MIC < 8 μg/mL
at pre-treatment. Relapse was almost always accompanied by an increase in MIC.
The median time to first negative culture was 54, 41, and 29 days for the 500,
1000, and 2000 mg b.i.d. groups, respectively. The time to first decrease of
at least 1 log in CFU count was significantly shorter with the 1000 and 2000
mg b.i.d. doses (median equal to 16 and 15 days, respectively) in comparison
to the 500 mg b.i.d. group (median equal to 29 days). The median time to first
positive culture or study discontinuation following the first negative culture
was 43, 59 and 43 days for the 500, 1000, and 2000 mg b.i.d. groups, respectively.
Clinically Significant Disseminated MAC Disease
Among patients experiencing night sweats prior to therapy, 84% showed resolution
or improvement at some point during the 12 weeks of clarithromycin at 500 to
2000 mg b.i.d. doses. Similarly, 77% of patients reported resolution or improvement
in fevers at some point. Response rates for clinical signs of MAC are given
below:
| Resolution of Fever |
Resolution of Night Sweats |
| b.i.d. dose (mg) |
% ever afebrile |
% afebrile ≥ 6 weeks |
b.i.d. dose (mg) |
% ever resolving |
% resolving ≥ 6 weeks |
| 500 |
67% |
23% |
500 |
85% |
42% |
| 1000 |
67% |
12% |
1000 |
70% |
33% |
| 2000 |
62% |
22% |
2000 |
72% |
36% |
| Weight Gain > 3% |
Hemoglobin Increase > 1 gm |
| b.i.d. dose (mg) |
% eve rgaining |
% gaining ≥ 6 weeks |
b.i.d. dose (mg) |
% ever increasing |
% increasing ≥ 6 weeks |
| 500 |
33% |
14% |
500 |
58% |
26% |
| 1000 |
26% |
17% |
1000 |
37% |
6% |
| 2000 |
26% |
12% |
2000 |
62% |
18% |
The median duration of response, defined as improvement or resolution of clinical
signs and symptoms, was 2 to 6 weeks.
Since the study was not designed to determine the benefit of monotherapy beyond
12 weeks, the duration of response may be underestimated for the 25 to 33% of
patients who continued to show clinical response after 12 weeks.
Survival
Median survival time from study entry (Study 500) was 249 days at the 500 mg
b.i.d. dose compared to 215 days with the 1000 mg b.i.d. dose. However, during
the first 12 weeks of therapy, there were 2 deaths in 53 patients in the 500
mg b.i.d. group versus 13 deaths in 51 patients in the 1000 mg b.i.d. group.
The reason for this apparent mortality difference is not known. Survival in
the two groups was similar beyond 12 weeks. The median survival times for these
dosages were similar to recent historical controls with MAC when treated with
combination therapies.5
Median survival time from study entry in Study 577 was 199 days for the 500
mg b.i.d. dose and 179 days for the 1000 mg b.i.d. dose. During the first four
weeks of therapy, while patients were maintained on their originally assigned
dose, there were 11 deaths in 255 patients taking 500 mg b.i.d. and 18 deaths
in 214 patients taking 1000 mg b.i.d.
Safety
The adverse event profiles showed that both the 500 and 1000 mg b.i.d. doses
were well tolerated. The 2000 mg b.i.d. dose was poorly tolerated and resulted
in a higher proportion of premature discontinuations.
In AIDS patients and other immunocompromised patients treated with the higher
doses of clarithromycin over long periods of time for mycobacterial infections,
it was often difficult to distinguish adverse events possibly associated with
clarithromycin administration from underlying signs of HIV disease or intercurrent
illness.
The following analyses summarize experience during the first 12 weeks of therapy
with clarithromycin. Data are reported separately for Study 500 (randomized,
double-blind) and Study 577 (open-label, compassionate use) and also combined.
Adverse events were reported less frequently in Study 577, which may be due
in part to differences in monitoring between the two studies. In adult patients
receiving clarithromycin 500 mg b.i.d., the most frequently reported adverse
events, considered possibly or probably related to study drug, with an incidence
of 5% or greater, are listed below. Most of these events were mild to moderate
in severity, although 5% (Study 500: 8%; Study 577: 4%) of patients receiving
500 mg b.i.d. and 5% (Study 500: 4%; Study 577: 6%) of patients receiving 1000
mg b.i.d. reported severe adverse events. Excluding those patients who discontinued
therapy or died due to complications of their underlying non-mycobacterial disease,
approximately 8% (Study 500: 15%; Study 577: 7%) of the patients who received
500 mg b.i.d. and 12% (Study 500: 14%; Study 577: 12%) of the patients who received
1000 mg b.i.d. discontinued therapy due to drugrelated events during the first
12 weeks of therapy. Overall, the 500 and 1000 mg b.i.d. doses had similar adverse
event profiles.
Treatment-related* Adverse Event Incidence Rates (%) in Immunocompromised
Adult Patients During the First 12 Weeks of Therapy with 500 mg b.i.d. Clarithromycin
Dose
| Adverse Event |
Study 500
(n = 53) |
Study 577
(n = 255) |
Combined
(n = 308) |
| Abdominal Pain |
7.5 |
2.4 |
3.2 |
| Diarrhea |
9.4 |
1.6 |
2.9 |
| Flatulence |
7.5 |
0.0 |
1.3 |
| Headache |
7.5 |
0.4 |
1.6 |
| Nausea |
28.3 |
9.0 |
12.3 |
| Rash |
9.4 |
2.0 |
3.2 |
| Taste Perversion |
18.9 |
0.4 |
3.6 |
| Vomiting |
24.5 |
3.9 |
7.5 |
| * Includes those events possibly or probably
related to study drug and excludes concurrent conditions. |
A limited number of pediatric AIDS patients have been treated with clarithromycin
suspension for mycobacterial infections. The most frequently reported adverse
events, excluding those due to the patient's concurrent condition, were consistent
with those observed in adult patients.
Changes in Laboratory Values
In immunocompromised patients treated with clarithromycin for mycobacterial
infections, evaluations of laboratory values were made by analyzing those values
outside the seriously abnormal level (i.e., the extreme high or low limit) for
the specified test.
Percentage of Patients(a) Exceeding Extreme Laboratory
Value Limits During First 12 Weeks of Treatment 500 mg b.i.d. Dose(b)
| |
|
Study 500 |
Study 577 |
Combined |
| BUN |
> 50 mg/dL |
0% |
< 1% |
< 1% |
| Platelet Count |
< 50 x 109/L |
0% |
< 1% |
< 1% |
| SGOT |
> 5 x ULN(c) |
0% |
3% |
2% |
| SGPT |
> 5 x ULN(c) |
0% |
2% |
1% |
| WBC |
< 1 x 109/L |
0% |
1% |
1% |
(a) Includes only patients with baseline
values within the normal range or borderline high (hematology variables)
and within the normal range or borderline low (chemistry variables)
(b) Includes all values within the first 12 weeks for patients who start
on 500 mg b.i.d.
(c) ULN = Upper Limit of Normal |
Otitis Media
In a controlled clinical study of acute otitis media performed in the United
States, where significant rates of beta-lactamase producing organisms were found,
clarithromycin was compared to an oral cephalosporin. In this study, very strict
evaluability criteria were used to determine clinical response. For the 223
patients who were evaluated for clinical efficacy, the clinical success rate
(i.e., cure plus improvement) at the post-therapy visit was 88% for clarithromycin
and 91% for the cephalosporin.
In a smaller number of patients, microbiologic determinations were made at
the pre-treatment visit. The following presumptive bacterial eradication/clinical
cure outcomes (i.e., clinical success) were obtained:
U.S. Acute Otitis Media Study Clarithromycin vs. Oral Cephalosporin
EFFICACY RESULTS
| PATHOGEN |
OUTCOME |
| S. pneumoniae |
clarithromycin success rate, 13/15 (87%), control 4/5 |
| H. influenzae* |
clarithromycin success rate, 10/14 (71%), control 3/4 |
| M. catarrhalis |
clarithromycin success rate, 4/5,control 1/1 |
| S. pyogenes |
clarithromycin success rate, 3/3,control 0/1 |
| Overall |
clarithromycin success rate, 30/37 (81%), control 8/11 (73%) |
| * None of the H. influenzae isolated pre-treatment
was resistant to clarithromycin; 6% were resistant to the control agent. |
Safety
The incidence of adverse events in all patients treated, primarily diarrhea
and vomiting, did not differ clinically or statistically for the two agents.
In two other controlled clinical trials of acute otitis media performed in
the United States, where significant rates of beta-lactamase producing organisms
were found, clarithromycin was compared to an oral antimicrobial agent that
contained a specific beta-lactamase inhibitor. In these studies, very strict
evaluability criteria were used to determine the clinical responses. In the
233 patients who were evaluated for clinical efficacy, the combined clinical
success rate (i.e., cure and improvement) at the post-therapy visit was 91%
for both clarithromycin and the control.
For the patients who had microbiologic determinations at the pre-treatment
visit, the following presumptive bacterial eradication/clinical cure outcomes
(i.e., clinical success) were obtained:
Two U.S. Acute Otitis Media Studies Clarithromycin vs. Antimicrobial/Beta-lactamase
Inhibitor EFFICACY RESULTS
| PATHOGEN |
OUTCOME |
| S. pneumoniae |
clarithromycin success rate, 43/51 (84%), control 55/56 (98%) |
| H. influenzae* |
clarithromycin success rate, 36/45 (80%), control 31/33 (94%) |
| M. catarrhalis |
clarithromycin success rate, 9/10 (90%), control 6/6 |
| S. pyogenes |
clarithromycin success rate, 3/3, control 5/5 |
| Overall |
clarithromycin success rate, 91/109 (83%), control 97/100 (97%) |
| * Of the H. influenzae isolated pre-treatment,
3% were resistant to clarithromycin and 10% were resistant to the control
agent. |
Safety
The incidence of adverse events in all patients treated, primarily diarrhea
(15% vs. 38%) and diaper rash (3% vs. 11%) in young children, was clinically
and statistically lower in the clarithromycin arm versus the control arm.
Duodenal Ulcer Associated with H. pylori Infection
Clarithromycin + Lansoprazole and Amoxicillin
H. pylori Eradication for Reducing the Risk of Duodenal Ulcer Recurrence
Two U.S. randomized, double-blind clinical studies in patients with H. pylori
and duodenal ulcer disease (defined as an active ulcer or history of an active
ulcer within one year) evaluated the efficacy of clarithromycin in combination
with lansoprazole and amoxicillin capsules as triple 14-day therapy for eradication
of H. pylori . Based on the results of these studies, the safety and efficacy
of the following eradication regimen were established:
Triple therapy: BIAXIN (clarithromycin) 500 mg b.i.d. + lansoprazole 30 mg
b.i.d. + amoxicillin 1 gm b.i.d.
Treatment was for 14 days. H. pylori eradication was defined as two
negative tests (culture and histology) at 4 to 6 weeks following the end of
treatment.
The combination of BIAXIN plus lansoprazole and amoxicillin as triple therapy
was effective in eradicating H. pylori. Eradication of H. pylori
has been shown to reduce the risk of duodenal ulcer recurrence.
A randomized, double-blind clinical study performed in the U.S. in patients
with H. pylori and duodenal ulcer disease (defined as an active ulcer
or history of an ulcer within one year) compared the efficacy of clarithromycin
in combination with lansoprazole and amoxicillin as triple therapy for 10 and
14 days. This study established that the 10-day triple therapy was equivalent
to the 14-day triple therapy in eradicating H. pylori.
H. pylori Eradication Rates-Triple Therapy
(BIAXIN/lansoprazole/amoxicillin) Percent of Patients Cured [95% Confidence
Interval] (number of patients)
| Study |
Duration |
Triple Therapy
Evaluable Analysis* |
Triple Therapy
Intent-to-Treat Analysis# |
| M93-131 |
14 days |
92† [80.0-97.7] |
86† [73.3-93.5] |
| (n = 48) |
(n = 55) |
| M95-392 |
14 days |
86‡ [75.7-93.6] |
83‡ [72.0-90.8] |
| (n = 66) |
(n = 70) |
| M95-399¶ |
14 days |
85 [77.0-91.0] |
82 [73.9-88.1] |
| (N = 113) |
(N = 126) |
| 10 days |
84 [76.0-89.8] |
81 [73.9-87.6] |
| (N = 123) |
(N = 135) |
* Based on evaluable patients with confirmed
duodenal ulcer (active or within one year) and H. pylori infection at
baseline defined as at least two of three positive endoscopic tests from
CLOtest (Delta West LTD., Bentley, Australia), histology, and/or culture.
Patients were included in the analysis if they completed the study. Additionally,
if patients were dropped out of the study due to an adverse event related
to the study drug, they were included in the analysis as evaluable failures
of therapy.
# Patients were included in the analysis if they had documented H. pylori
infection at baseline as defined above and had a confirmed duodenal ulcer
(active or within one year). All dropouts were included as failures of
therapy.
† (p < 0.05) versus BIAXIN/lansoprazole and lansoprazole/amoxicillin
dual therapy.
‡ (p < 0.05) versus BIAXIN/amoxicillin dual therapy.
¶ The 95% confidence interval for the difference in eradication rates,
10-day minus 14-day, is (-10.5, 8.1) in the evaluable analysis and (-9.7,
9.1) in the intent-to-treat analysis. |
Clarithromycin + Omeprazole and Amoxicillin Therapy
H. pylori Eradication for Reducing the Risk of Duodenal Ulcer Recurrence
Three U.S., randomized, double-blind clinical studies in patients with H. pylori
infection and duodenal ulcer disease (n = 558) compared clarithromycin plus
omeprazole and amoxicillin to clarithromycin plus amoxicillin. Two studies (Studies
126 and 127) were conducted in patients with an active duodenal ulcer, and the
third study (Study 446) was conducted in patients with a duodenal ulcer in the
past 5 years, but without an ulcer present at the time of enrollment. The dosage
regimen in the studies was clarithromycin 500 mg b.i.d. plus omeprazole 20 mg
b.i.d. plus amoxicillin 1 gram b.i.d. for 10 days. In Studies 126 and 127, patients
who took the omeprazole regimen also received an additional 18 days of omeprazole
20 mg q.d. Endpoints studied were eradication of H. pylori and duodenal
ulcer healing (studies 126 and 127 only). H. pylori status was determined by
CLOtest®, histology, and culture in all three studies. For a given patient,
H. pylori was considered eradicated if at least two of these tests were negative,
and none was positive. The combination of clarithromycin plus omeprazole and
amoxicillin was effective in eradicating H. pylori .
Per-Protocol and Intent-to-Treat H. pylori Eradication Rates
% of Patients Cured [95% Confidence Interval]
| |
Clarithromycin + omeprazole + amoxicillin |
Clarithromycin + amoxicillin |
| Per-Protocol † |
Intent-to-Treat ‡ |
Per-Protocol † |
Intent-to-Treat ‡ |
| Study 126 |
*77 [64, 86] |
69 [57, 79] |
43 [31, 56] |
37 [27, 48] |
| (n = 64) |
(n = 80) |
(n = 67) |
(n = 84) |
| Study 127 |
*78 [67, 88] |
73 [61, 82] |
41 [29, 54] |
36 [26, 47] |
| (n = 65) |
(n = 77) |
(n = 68) |
(n = 84) |
| Study M96-446 |
*90 [80, 96] |
83 [74, 91] |
33 [24, 44] |
32 [23, 42] |
| (n = 69) |
(n = 84) |
(n = 93) |
(n = 99) |
†Patients were included in the analysis
if they had confirmed duodenal ulcer disease (active ulcer studies 126
and 127; history of ulcer within 5 years, study M96-446) and H. pyloriinfection
at baseline defined as at least two of three positive endoscopic tests
from CLOtest®, histology, and/or culture. Patients were included in
the analysis if they completed the study. Additionally, if patients dropped
out of the study due to an adverse event related to the study drug, they
were included in the analysis as failures of therapy. The impact of eradication
on ulcer recurrence has not been assessed in patients with a past history
of ulcer.
‡ Patients were included in the analysis if they had documented
H. pylori infection at baseline and had confirmed duodenal ulcer disease.
All dropouts were included as failures of therapy.
* p < 0.05 versus clarithromycin plus amoxicillin. |
Safety
In clinical trials using combination therapy with clarithromycin plus omeprazole
and amoxicillin, no adverse reactions peculiar to the combination of these drugs
have been observed. Adverse reactions that have occurred have been limited to
those that have been previously reported with clarithromycin, omeprazole, or
amoxicillin.
The most frequent adverse experiences observed in clinical trials using combination
therapy with clarithromycin plus omeprazole and amoxicillin (n = 274) were diarrhea
(14%), taste perversion (10%), and headache (7%).
For information about adverse reactions with omeprazole or amoxicillin, refer
to the ADVERSE REACTIONS section of their package inserts.
Clarithromycin + Omeprazole Therapy
Four randomized, double-blind, multi-center studies (067, 100, 812b, and 058)
evaluated clarithromycin 500 mg t.i.d. plus omeprazole 40 mg q.d. for 14 days,
followed by omeprazole 20 mg q.d. (067, 100, and 058) or by omeprazole 40 mg
q.d. (812b) for an additional 14 days in patients with active duodenal ulcer
associated with H. pylori . Studies 067 and 100 were conducted in the U.S. and
Canada and enrolled 242 and 256 patients, respectively. H. pylori infection
and duodenal ulcer were confirmed in 219 patients in Study 067 and 228 patients
in Study 100. These studies compared the combination regimen to omeprazole and
clarithromycin monotherapies. Studies 812b and 058 were conducted in Europe
and enrolled 154 and 215 patients, respectively. H. pylori infection and duodenal
ulcer were confirmed in 148 patients in Study 812b and 208 patients in Study
058. These studies compared the combination regimen to omeprazole monotherapy.
The results for the efficacy analyses for these studies are described below.
Duodenal Ulcer Healing
The combination of clarithromycin and omeprazole was as effective as omeprazole
alone for healing duodenal ulcer.
End-of-Treatment Ulcer Healing Rates Percent of Patients
Healed (n/N)
| Study |
Clarithromycin + Omeprazole |
Omeprazole |
Clarithromycin |
| U.S. Studies |
| Study 100 |
94% (58/62)† |
88% (60/68) |
71% (49/69) |
| Study 067 |
88% (56/64)† |
85% (55/65) |
64% (44/69) |
| Non-U.S. Studies |
| Study 058 |
99% (84/85) |
95% (82/86) |
N/A |
| Study 812b1 |
100% (64/64) |
99% (71/72) |
N/A |
† p < 0.05 for clarithromycin
+ omeprazole versus clarithromycin monotherapy.
1 In Study 812b patients received omeprazole 40 mg daily for days 15 to
28. |
Eradication of H. pylori Associated with Duodenal Ulcer
The combination of clarithromycin and omeprazole was effective in eradicating
H. pylori.
H. pylori Eradication Rates (Per-Protocol Analysis) at 4
to 6 weeks Percent of Patients Cured (n/N)
| Study |
Clarithromycin + Omeprazole |
Omeprazole |
Clarithromycin |
| U.S. Studies |
| Study 100 |
64% (39/61)†‡ |
0% (0/59) |
39% (17/44) |
| Study 067 |
74% (39/53)†‡ |
0% (0/54) |
31% (13/42) |
| Non-U.S. Studies |
| Study 058 |
74% (64/86)‡ |
1% (1/90) |
N/A |
| Study 812b |
83% (50/60)‡ |
1% (1/74) |
N/A |
† Statistically significantly higher
than clarithromycin monotherapy (p < 0.05).
‡ Statistically significantly higher than omeprazole monotherapy
(p < 0.05). |
H. pylori eradication was defined as no positive test (culture or histology)
at 4 weeks following the end of treatment, and two negative tests were required
to be considered eradicated. In the per-protocol analysis, the following patients
were excluded: dropouts, patients with major protocol violations, patients with
missing H. pylori tests post-treatment, and patients that were not assessed
for H. pylori eradication at 4 weeks after the end of treatment because
they were found to have an unhealed ulcer at the end of treatment.
Ulcer recurrence at 6-months following the end of treatment was assessed for
patients in whom ulcers were healed post-treatment.
Ulcer Recurrence at 6 months by H. pylori Status at 4-6 Weeks
| |
H. pylori Negative |
H. pylori Positive |
| U.S. Studies |
|
|
| Study 100 |
| Clarithromycin + Omeprazole |
6% (2/34) |
56% (9/16) |
| Omeprazole |
- (0/0) |
71% (35/49) |
| Clarithromycin |
12% (2/17) |
32% (7/22) |
| Study 067 |
| Clarithromycin + Omeprazole |
38% (11/29) |
50% (6/12) |
| Omeprazole |
- (0/0) |
67% (31/46) |
| Clarithromycin |
18% (2/11) |
52% (14/27) |
| Non-U.S. Studies |
|
|
| Study 058 |
| Clarithromycin + Omeprazole |
6% (3/53) |
24% (4/17) |
| Omeprazole |
0% (0/3) |
55% (39/71) |
| Study 812b* |
| Clarithromycin + Omeprazole |
5% (2/42) |
0% (0/7) |
| Omeprazole |
0% (0/1) |
54% (32/59) |
| *12-month recurrence rates: |
Thus, in patients with duodenal ulcer associated with H. pylori infection,
eradication of H. pylori reduced ulcer recurrence.
Safety
The adverse event profiles for the four studies showed that the combination
of clarithromycin 500 mg t.i.d. and omeprazole 40 mg q.d. for 14 days, followed
by omeprazole 20 mg q.d. (067, 100, and 058) or 40 mg q.d. (812b) for an additional
14 days was well tolerated. Of the 346 patients who received the combination,
12 (3.5%) patients discontinued study drug due to adverse events.
Adverse Events with an Incidence of 3% or Greater
| Adverse Event |
Clarithromycin + Omeprazole
(N = 346)
% of Patients |
Omeprazole
(N = 355)
% of Patients
|
Clarithromycin
(N = 166)
% of Patients* |
| Taste Perversion |
15% |
1% |
16% |
| Nausea |
5% |
1% |
3% |
| Headache |
5% |
6% |
9% |
| Diarrhea |
4% |
3% |
7% |
| Vomiting |
4% |
< 1% |
1% |
| Abdominal Pain |
3% |
2% |
1% |
| Infection |
3% |
4% |
2% |
| * Studies 067 and 100, only. |
Most of these events were mild to moderate in severity.
Changes in Laboratory Values
Changes in laboratory values with possible clinical significance in patients
taking clarithromycin and omeprazole were as follows:
Hepatic - elevated direct bilirubin < 1%; GGT < 1%; SGOT (AST) < 1%;
SGPT (ALT) < 1%.
Renal - elevated serum creatinine < 1%.
For information on omeprazole, refer to the ADVERSE REACTIONS section of the
PRILOSEC package insert.
Clarithromycin + Ranitidine Bismuth Citrate Therapy
In a U.S. double-blind, randomized, multicenter, dose-comparison trial, ranitidine
bismuth citrate 400 mg b.i.d. for 4 weeks plus clarithromycin 500 mg b.i.d.
for the first 2 weeks was found to have an equivalent H. pylori eradication
rate (based on culture and histology) when compared to ranitidine bismuth citrate
400 mg b.i.d. for 4 weeks plus clarithromycin 500 mg t.i.d. for the first 2
weeks. The intent-to-treat H. pylori eradication rates are shown below:
H. pylori Eradication Rates in Study H2BA-3001
| Analysis |
RBC 400 mg + Clarithromycin
500 mg b.i.d. |
RBC 400 mg + Clarithromycin
500 mg t.i.d. |
95% CI Rate Difference |
| ITT |
65% (122/188) |
63% (122/195) |
(-8%, 12%) |
| [58%, 72%] |
[55%, 69%] |
|
| Per-Protocol |
72% (117/162) |
71% (120/170) |
(-9%, 12%) |
| [65%, 79%] |
[63%, 77%] |
|
H. pylori eradication was defined as no positive test at 4 weeks following
the end of treatment. Patients must have had two tests performed, and these
must have been negative to be considered eradicated of H. pylori . The
following patients were excluded from the per-protocol analysis: patients not
infected with H. pylori prestudy, dropouts, patients with major protocol
violations, patients with missing H. pylori tests. Patients excluded
from the intent-to-treat analysis included those not infected with H. pylori
prestudy and those with missing H. pylori tests prestudy. Patients were
assessed for H. pylori eradication (4 weeks following treatment) regardless
of their healing status (at the end of treatment).
The relationship between H. pylori eradication and duodenal ulcer recurrence
was assessed in a combined analysis of six U.S. randomized, double-blind, multicenter,
placebo-controlled trials using ranitidine bismuth citrate with or without antibiotics.
The results from approximately 650 U.S. patients showed that the risk of ulcer
recurrence within 6 months of completing treatment was two times less likely
in patients whose H. pylori infection was eradicated compared to patients
in whom H. pylori infection was not eradicated.
Safety
In clinical trials using combination therapy with clarithromycin plus ranitidine
bismuth citrate, no adverse reactions peculiar to the combination of these drugs
(using clarithromycin twice daily or three times a day) were observed. Adverse
reactions that have occurred have been limited to those reported with clarithromycin
or ranitidine bismuth citrate. (See ADVERSE REACTIONS section of the
Tritec package insert.) The most frequent adverse experiences observed in clinical
trials using combination therapy with clarithromycin (500 mg three times a day)
with ranitidine bismuth citrate (n = 329) were taste disturbance (11%), diarrhea
(5%), nausea and vomiting (3%). The most frequent adverse experiences observed
in clinical trials using combination therapy with clarithromycin (500 mg twice
daily) with ranitidine bismuth citrate (n = 196) were taste disturbance (8%),
nausea and vomiting (5%), and diarrhea (4%).
Animal Pharmacology And Toxicology
Clarithromycin is rapidly and well-absorbed with dose-linear kinetics, low
protein binding, and a high volume of distribution. Plasma half-life ranged
from 1 to 6 hours and was species dependent. High tissue concentrations were
achieved, but negligible accumulation was observed. Fecal clearance predominated.
Hepatotoxicity occurred in all species tested (i.e., in rats and monkeys at
doses 2 times greater than and in dogs at doses comparable to the maximum human
daily dose, based on mg/m²). Renal tubular degeneration (calculated on
a mg/m² basis) occurred in rats at doses 2 times, in monkeys at doses 8
times, and in dogs at doses 12 times greater than the maximum human daily dose.
Testicular atrophy (on a mg/m² basis) occurred in rats at doses 7 times,
in dogs at doses 3 times, and in monkeys at doses 8 times greater than the maximum
human daily dose. Corneal opacity (on a mg/m² basis) occurred in dogs at
doses 12 times and in monkeys at doses 8 times greater than the maximum human
daily dose. Lymphoid depletion (on a mg/m² basis) occurred in dogs at doses
3 times greater than and in monkeys at doses 2 times greater than the maximum
human daily dose. These adverse events were absent during clinical trials.
REFERENCES
4. Chaisson RE, et al. Clarithromycin and Ethambutol with or
without Clofazimine for the Treatment of Bacteremic Mycobacterium avium Complex
Disease in Patients with HIV Infection. AIDS. 1997;11:311-317.
5. Kemper CA, et al. Treatment of Mycobacterium avium Complex
Bacteremia in AIDS with a Four-Drug Oral Regimen. Ann Intern Med. 1992;116:466-472.
Last updated on RxList: 9/28/2009