- « Previous
- Clinical Pharmacology
- Next »
Prempro
Clinical Pharmacology
Prempro
Results of vaginal maturation indexes at cycles 6 and 13 showed that the differences from placebo were statistically significant (p < 0.001) for all treatment groups (conjugated estrogens alone and conjugated estrogens/medroxyprogesterone acetate treatment groups).
Effects on the endometrium
In a 1-year clinical trial of 1,376 women (average age 54.0 ± 4.6 years) randomized to PREMPRO 0.625 mg/2.5 mg (n=340), PREMPRO 0.625 mg/5 mg (n=338), PREMPHASE 0.625 mg/5 mg (n=351), or Premarin 0.625 mg alone (n=347), results of evaluable biopsies at 12 months (n=279, 274, 277, and 283, respectively) showed a reduced risk of endometrial hyperplasia in the two PREMPRO treatment groups (less than 1 percent) and in the PREMPHASE treatment group (less than 1 percent; 1 percent when focal hyperplasia was included) compared to the Premarin group (8 percent; 20 percent when focal hyperplasia was included). See Table 4.
TABLE 4. INCIDENCE OF ENDOMETRIAL HYPERPLASIA AFTER ONE YEAR
OF TREATMENT
| Groups | ||||
| PREMPRO | PREMPRO | PREMPHASE | Premarin | |
| 0.625 mg/2.5 mg | 0.625 mg/5 mg | 0.625 mg/5 mg | 0.625 mg | |
| Total number of patients | 340 | 338 | 351 | 347 |
| Number of patients with evaluable biopsies | 279 | 274 | 277 | 283 |
| No. (%) of patients with biopsies | ||||
| • all focal and non-focal hyperplasia | 2 ( < 1)* | 0 (0)* | 3 (1)* | 57 (20) |
| • excluding focal cystic hyperplasia | 2 ( < 1)* | 0 (0)* | 1 ( < 1)* | 25 (8) |
| * Significant (p < 0.001) in comparison with Premarin (0.625 mg) alone. | ||||
In the first year of the Health and Osteoporosis, Progestin and Estrogen (HOPE) Study, 2,001 women (average age 53.3 ± 4.9 years) of whom 88 percent were Caucasian were treated with either Premarin 0.625 mg alone (n = 348), Premarin 0.45 mg alone (n = 338), Premarin 0.3 mg alone (n = 326) or PREMPRO 0.625 mg/2.5 mg (n = 331), PREMPRO 0.45 mg/1.5 mg (n = 331) or PREMPRO 0.3 mg/1.5 mg (n = 327). Results of evaluable endometrial biopsies at 12 months showed a reduced risk of endometrial hyperplasia or cancer in the PREMPRO treatment groups compared with the corresponding Premarin alone treatment groups, except for the PREMPRO 0.3 mg/1.5 mg and Premarin 0.3 mg alone groups, in each of which there was only 1 case. See Table 5.
No endometrial hyperplasia or cancer was noted in those patients treated with the continuous combined regimens who continued for a second year in the osteoporosis and metabolic substudy of the HOPE study. See Table 6.
TABLE 5. INCIDENCE OF ENDOMETRIAL HYPERPLASIA/CANCERa
AFTER ONE YEAR OF TREATMENTb
| Groups | ||||||
| Patient | Prempro 0.625 mg/ 2.5 mg |
Premarin 0.625 mg |
Prempro 0.45 mg/ 1.5 mg |
Premarin 0.45 mg |
Prempro 0.3 mg/ 1.5 mg |
Premarin 0.3 mg |
| Total number of patients | 331 | 348 | 331 | 338 | 327 | 326 |
| Number of patients with evaluable biopsies | 278 | 249 | 272 | 279 | 271 | 269 |
| No. (%) of patients with biopsies | ||||||
| •hyperplasia/cancera (consensusc) |
0 (0)d | 20 (8) | 1 ( < 1)a,d | 9 (3) | 1 ( < 1)e | 1 ( < 1)a |
| a All cases of hyperplasia/cancer were endometrial
hyperplasia except for 1 patient in thePremarin 0.3 mg group diagnosed
with endometrial cancer based on endometrial biopsy, and 1patient in the
Premarin/MPA 0.45 mg/1.5 mg group diagnosed with endometrial cancer based
onendometrial biopsy. b Two (2) primary pathologists evaluated each endometrial biopsy. Where there was lack ofagreement on the presence or absence of hyperplasia/cancer between the two, a third pathologistadjudicated (consensus). c For an endometrial biopsy to be counted as consensus endometrial hyperplasia or cancer, atleast 2 pathologists had to agree on the diagnosis. d Significant (p < 0.05) in comparison with corresponding dose of Premarin alone.e: Non-significant in comparison with corresponding dose of Premarin alone. |
||||||
TABLE 6. OSTEOPOROSIS AND METABOLIC SUBSTUDY, INCIDENCE OF
ENDOMETRIAL HYPERPLASIA/CANCERa AFTER TWO YEARS OF TREATMENTb
| Patient | Groups | |||||
| Prempro 0.625 mg/ 2.5 mg |
Premarin 0.625mg |
Prempro 0.45 mg/ 1.5 mg |
Premarin 0.45 mg |
Prempro 0.3 mg/ 1.5 mg |
Premarin 0.3 mg |
|
| Total number of patients | 75 | 65 | 75 | 74 | 79 | 73 |
| Number of patients with evaluable biopsies | 62 | 55 | 69 | 67 | 75 | 63 |
| No. (%) of patients with biopsies | ||||||
| •hyperplasia/cancera (consensusc) |
0 (0)d | 15 (27) | 0 (0)d | 10 (15) | 0 (0)d | 2 (3) |
| a All cases of hyperplasia/cancer
were endometrial hyperplasia in patients who continued for asecond year
in the osteoporosis and metabolic substudy of the HOPE study. b Two (2) primary pathologists evaluated each endometrial biopsy. Where there was lack ofagreement on the presence or absence of hyperplasia/cancer between the two, a third pathologistadjudicated (consensus). c For an endometrial biopsy to be counted as consensus endometrial hyperplasia or cancer, atleast 2 pathologists had to agree on the diagnosis. d Significant (p < 0.05) in comparison with corresponding dose of Premarin alone. |
||||||
Effects on uterine bleeding or spotting
Generic Name: Conjugated Estrogens, Medroxyprogesterone Acetate
- « Previous
- Clinical Pharmacology
- Next »
Menopause Myths
A generation ago, no one talked about menopause. Today it's openly discussed. But some common menopause myths persist. See more WebMD Videos »
Women's Health
Find out what women really need.
