- « Previous
- Clinical Pharmacology
- Next »
Eloxatin
Clinical Pharmacology
Eloxatin
The following table and figures summarize the disease-free survival (DFS) results in the overall randomized population and in patients with stage II and III disease based on an ITT analysis.
Table 18 - Summary of DFS analysis [ITT analysis (minimumfollow-up
of 41 months)]
| Parameter | ELOXATIN + Infusional 5-FU/LV | Infusional 5-FU/LV |
| Overall | ||
| N | 1123 | 1123 |
| Median follow-up (months)* | 47.7 | 47.4 |
| Number of events – relapse or death (%) | 267 (23.8) | 332 (29.6) |
| 4-year Disease-free survival % [95%CI] | 75.9 [73.4, 78.5] | 69.1 [66.3, 71.9] |
| Hazard ratio [95% CI] | 0.76 [0.65, 0.90] | |
| Stratified Logrank test | p=0.0008 | |
| Stage III | ||
| N | 672 | 675 |
| Number of events –relapse or death(%) | 200 (29.8) | 252 (37.3) |
| 4-year Disease-free survival % [95%CI] | 69.7 [66.2, 73.3] | 61.0 [57.1, 64.8] |
| Hazard ratio [95% CI] | 0.75 [0.62, 0.90] | |
| Logrank test | p=0.002 | |
| Stage II | ||
| N | 451 | 448 |
| Number of events – relapse or death(%) | 67 (14.9) | 80 (17.9) |
| 4-year Disease-free survival % [95%CI] | 85.1 [81.7, 88.6] | 81.3 [77.6, 85.1] |
| Hazard ratio [95% CI] | 0.80 [0.58, 1.11] | |
| Logrank test | p=0.179 | |
| *For patients alive or lost to follow-up | ||
In the overall study population DFS was statistically significantly improved in the ELOXATIN combination armcompared to infusional 5-FU/LV alone. A statistically significant improvement in DFS was noted in Stage III patients, but not in Stage II patients.
Figure 2 shows the Kaplan-Meier DFS curves for the comparison of ELOXATIN and infusional 5-FU/LV combination and infusional 5-FU/LV alone for the overall population (ITT analysis). Figure 3 shows the Kaplan-Meier DFS curves for the comparison of ELOXATIN and infusional 5-FU/LV combination and infusional 5-FU/LV alone for the Stage III Subgroup.
Figure 2 - Kaplan-Meier DFS curves by treatment armfor Overall
Population
![]() |
Figure 3 - Kaplan-Meier DFS curves by treatment armfor Stage
III Subgroup
![]() |
Survival data were not mature at the time of the analysis with a median follow-up of 47 months. No statistically significant difference in overall survival [Hazard Ratio 0.89 (95% CI 0.72, 1.09) p=0.236] was shown between the two treatment arms in the entire population or in the Stage II [Hazard Ratio 0.98 (95% CI 0.63, 1.53) p=0.94] or Stage III [Hazard Ratio 0.86 (95%CI 0.68, 1.08) p=0.196] subgroups.
Generic Name: Oxaliplatin Injection
- « Previous
- Clinical Pharmacology
- Next »
Cancer and Exercise
Resting to conserve energy may not be the best remedy for fatigue during radiation therapy. See more WebMD Videos »
Cancer
Get the latest treatment options.


