- « Previous
- Clinical Pharmacology
- Next »
Pepcid
Clinical Pharmacology
Pepcid
Time to complete relief of daytime and nighttime pain was statistically significantly shorter for patients receiving PEPCID than for patients receiving placebo; however, in neither study was there a statistically significant difference in the proportion of patients whose pain was relieved by the end of the study (week 8).
Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD)
Orally administered PEPCID was compared to placebo in a U.S. study that enrolled patients with symptoms of GERD and without endoscopic evidence of erosion or ulceration of the esophagus. PEPCID 20 mg b.i.d. was statistically significantly superior to 40 mg h.s. and to placebo in providing a successful symptomatic outcome, defined as moderate or excellent improvement of symptoms (Table 3).
Table 3
% Successful Symptomatic Outcome
| PEPCID 20 mg b.i.d. (N=154) |
PEPCID 40 mg h.s. (N=149) |
Placebo (N=73) |
|
| Week 6 | 82†† | 69 | 62 |
| ††p ≤ 0.01 vs Placebo | |||
By two weeks of treatment symptomatic success was observed in a greater percentage of patients taking PEPCID 20 mg b.i.d. compared to placebo (p ≤ 0.01).
Symptomatic improvement and healing of endoscopically verified erosion and ulceration were studied in two additional trials. Healing was defined as complete resolution of all erosions or ulcerations visible with endoscopy. The U.S. study comparing PEPCID 40 mg p.o. b.i.d. to placebo and PEPCID 20 mg p.o. b.i.d. showed a significantly greater percentage of healing for PEPCID 40 mg b.i.d. at weeks 6 and 12 (Table 4).
Table 4
%Endoscopic Healing - U.S. Study
| PEPCID 40 mg b.i.d. (N=127) |
PEPCID 20 mg b.i.d. (N=125) |
Placebo (N=66) |
|
| Week 6 | 48†††,‡‡ | 32 | 18 |
| Week 12 | 69†††,‡ | 54††† | 29 |
| †††p ≤ 0.01 vs Placebo ‡p ≤ 0.05 vs PEPCID 20 mg b.i.d. ‡‡p ≤ 0.01 vs PEPCID 20 mg b.i.d. |
|||
As compared to placebo, patients who received PEPCID had faster relief of daytime and nighttime heartburn and a greater percentage of patients experienced complete relief of nighttime heartburn. These differences were statistically significant.
In the international study, when PEPCID 40 mg p.o. b.i.d., was compared to ranitidine 150 mg p.o. b.i.d., a statistically significantly greater percentage of healing was observed with PEPCID 40 mg b.i.d. at week 12 (Table 5). There was, however, no significant difference among treatments in symptom relief.
Table 5
% Endoscopic Healing - International Study
| PEPCID 40 mg b.i.d. (N=175) |
PEPCID 20 mg b.i.d. (N=93) |
Ranitidine 150 mg b.i.d. (N=172) |
|
| Week 6 | 48 | 52 | 42 |
| Week 12 | 71‡‡‡ | 68 | 60 |
| ‡‡‡p ≤ 0.05 vs Ranitidine 150 mg b.i.d. | |||
Pathological Hypersecretory Conditions (e.g., Zollinger-Ellison Syndrome,Multiple Endocrine Adenomas)
Generic Name: Famotidine
- « Previous
- Clinical Pharmacology
- Next »
GI Disorders
Get the latest treatment options.
Eating With Heartburn/Acid Reflux
If you have chronic heartburn, you are at risk for GERD. If left untreated, GERD can put you at risk for cancer of the esophagus. See more WebMD Videos »
