Find a Drug
Advanced Search

Professional

FluMist

Clinical Pharmacology
font size

Clinical Pharmacology

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial (D153-P501) was performed to evaluate the efficacy of FluMist in children 12 to 35 months of age without high-risk medical conditions against culture-confirmed influenza illness, using the refrigerated formulation. A total of 3174 children were randomized 3:2 (vaccine:placebo) to receive 2 doses of study vaccine or placebo at least 28 days apart in Year 1. See Table 4 for a description of the results.

Study AV006: Pediatric Study

AV006 was a multi-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial performed in U.S. children without high-risk medical conditions to evaluate the efficacy of FluMist against culture-confirmed influenza over two successive seasons using the frozen formulation. The primary endpoint of the trial was the prevention of culture-confirmed influenza illness due to antigenically matched wild-type influenza in children, who received two doses of vaccine in the first year and a single revaccination dose in the second year. During the first year of the study 1602 children 15-71 months of age were randomized 2:1 (vaccine:placebo). Approximately 85% of the participants in the first year returned for the second year of the study. In Year 2, children remained in the same treatment group as in year one and received a single dose of FluMist or placebo. See Table 4 for a description of the results.

Table 4 D153-P501 & AV006, Years 1a: Efficacy of FluMist vs. Placebo against Culture-Confirmed Influenza Illness due to Wild-Type Strains


  D153-P501 AV006
FluMist
nb (%)
Placebo
nb (%)
% Efficacy
(95% CI)
FluMist
nb (%)
Placebo
nb (%)
% Efficacy
(95% CI)
  Nc=1653 Nc=1111   Nc=849 Nc=410  
Any strain 56 (3.4%) 139 (12.5%) 72.9%d
(62.8, 80.5)
10 (1%) 73 (18%) 93.4%
(87.5, 96.5)
A/H1N1 23 (1.4%) 81 (7.3%) 80.9%
(69.4, 88.5)e
0 0 --
A/H3N2 4 (0.2%) 27 (2.4%) 90.0%
(71.4, 97.5)
4 (0.5%) 48 (12%) 96.0%
(89.4, 98.5)
B 29 (1.8%) 35 (3.2%) 44.3%
(6.2, 67.2)
6 (0.7%) 31 (7%) 90.5%
(78.0, 95.9)
a D153-P501 and AV006 data are for subjects who received two doses of study vaccine.
b Number and percent of subjects in per-protocol efficacy analysis population with culture-confirmed influenzaillness.
c Number of subjects in per-protocol efficacy analysis population of each treatment group of each study for the “any strain” analysis.
d For D153-P501, influenza circulated through 12 months following vaccination.
e Estimate includes A/H1N1 and A/H1N2 strains. Both were considered antigenically similar to the vaccine.

During the second year of Study AV006, the primary circulating strain was the A/Sydney/05/97 H3N2 strain, which was antigenically dissimilar from the H3N2 strain represented in the vaccine, A/Wuhan/359/95; FluMist demonstrated 87.0% (95% CI: 77.0, 92.6) efficacy against culture-confirmed influenza illness.

Study in Adults

AV009 was a multi-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to evaluate effectiveness in adults 18-64 years of age without high-risk medical conditions. Participants were randomized 2:1, vaccine:placebo. Cultures for influenza virus were not obtained from subjects in the trial, so that the efficacy against culture-confirmed influenza was not assessed. The A/Wuhan/359/95 (H3N2) strain, which was contained in FluMist, was antigenically distinct from the predominant circulating strain of influenza virus during the trial period, A/Sydney/05/97 (H3N2). Type A/Wuhan (H3N2) and Type B strains also circulated in the U.S. during the study period. The primary endpoint of the trial was the reduction in the proportion of participants with one or more episodes of any febrile illness and prospective secondary endpoints were severe febrile illness, and febrile upper respiratory illness. Effectiveness for any of the three endpoints was not demonstrated in a subgroup of adults 50-64 years of age. Primary and secondary effectiveness endpoints from the age group 18-49 years of age are presented in Table 5. Effectiveness was not demonstrated for the primary endpoint in adults 18-49 years of age.

Table 5 Effectiveness of FluMista in Adults 18-49 Years of Age During the 7-week Site-Specific Outbreak Period


Endpoint FluMist
N=2411b
n (%)
Placebo
N=1226b
n (%)
Percent
Reduction
(95% CI)
Participants with one or more events of:c        
Primary Endpoint:        
Any febrile illness 331 (13.73) 189 (15.42) 10.9 (-5.1, 24.4)
Secondary Endpoints:        
Severe febrile illness 250 (10.37) 158 (12.89) 19.5 (3.0, 33.2)
Febrile upper respiratory illness 213 (8.83) 142 (11.58) 23.7 (6.7, 37.5)
a Frozen formulation used.
b Number of evaluable subjects (92.7% and 93.0% of FluMist and placebo recipients,respectively).
c The predominantly circulating virus during the trial period was A/Sydney/05/97 (H3N2), anantigenic variant not included in the vaccine.
Brand Name: FluMist
Generic Name: Influenza Virus Vaccine
Bookmark this page:

Living Better

Find the secrets to longer life.

WebMD Symptom Checker - Start Here Ringworm Slideshow: Watch and Learn

Medicine Cabinet Makeover Medicine Cabinet Makeover
When you’re sick, you don't want to go shopping for medicine. Find out how you can be prepared.See more WebMD Videos »