- « Previous
- Clinical Pharmacology
- Next »
Humira
Clinical Pharmacology
Humira
In the open-label extension of Study RA-III, 77% of the original patients treated with any dose of HUMIRA were evaluated radiographically at 2 years. Patients maintained inhibition of structural damage, as measured by the TSS. Fifty-four percent had no progression of structural damage as defined by a change in the TSS of zero or less.
Fifty-five percent (55%) of patients originally treated with 40 mg HUMIRA every other week have been evaluated radiographically at 5 years. Patients had continued inhibition of structural damage with 50% showing no progression of structural damage defined by a change in the TSS of zero or less.
In Study RA-V, structural joint damage was assessed as in Study RA-III. Greater inhibition of radiographic progression, as assessed by changes in TSS, erosion score and JSN was observed in the HUMIRA/MTX combination group as compared to either the MTX or HUMIRA monotherapy group at Week 52 as well as at Week 104 (see Table 6).
Table 6: Radiographic Mean Change* in Study RA-V
| MTXa N=257 |
HUMIRAa,b N=274 |
HUMIRA/MTX N=268 |
||
| 52 Weeks | Total Sharp score | 5.7 (4.2, 7.3) | 3.0 (1.7, 4.3) | 1.3 (0.5, 2.1) |
| Erosion score | 3.7 (2.7, 4.8) | 1.7 (1.0, 2.4) | 0.8 (0.4, 1.2) | |
| JSN score | 2.0 (1.2, 2.8) | 1.3 (0.5, 2.1) | 0.5 (0.0, 1.0) | |
| 104 Weeks | Total Sharp score | 10.4 (7.7, 13.2) | 5.5 (3.6, 7.4) | 1.9 (0.9, 2.9) |
| Erosion score | 6.4 (4.6, 8.2) | 3.0 (2.0, 4.0) | 1.0 (0.4, 1.6) | |
| JSN score | 4.1 (2.7, 5.4) | 2.6 (1.5, 3.7) | 0.9 (0.3, 1.5) | |
| * mean (95 % confidence interval) a p < 0.001, HUMIRA/MTX vs. MTX at 52 and 104 weeks and for HUMIRA/MTX vs. HUMIRA at 104 weeks b p < 0.01, for HUMIRA/MTX vs. HUMIRA at 52 weeks |
||||
Physical Function Response
In studies RA-I through IV, HUMIRA showed significantly greater improvement than placebo in the disability index of Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ-DI) from baseline to the end of study, and significantly greater improvement than placebo in the health-outcomes as assessed by The Short Form Health Survey (SF 36). Improvement was seen in both the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and the Mental Component Summary (MCS).
In Study RA-III, the mean (95% CI) improvement in HAQ-DI from baseline at week 52 was 0.60 (0.55, 0.65) for the HUMIRA patients and 0.25 (0.17, 0.33) for placebo/MTX (p < 0.001) patients. Sixty-three percent of HUMIRA-treated patients achieved a 0.5 or greater improvement in HAQ-DI at week 52 in the double-blind portion of the study. Eighty-two percent of these patients maintained that improvement through week 104 and a similar proportion of patients maintained this response through week 260 (5 years) of open- label treatment. Mean improvement in the SF-36 was maintained through the end of measurement at week 156 (3 years).
In Study RA-V, the HAQ-DI and the physical component of the SF-36 showed greater improvement (p < 0.001) for the HUMIRA/MTX combination therapy group versus either the MTX monotherapy or the HUMIRA monotherapy group at Week 52, which was maintained through Week 104.
Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis
The safety and efficacy of HUMIRA were assessed in a multicenter, randomized, withdrawal, double-blind, parallel-group study in 171 children (4 to 17 years old) with polyarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). In the study, the patients were stratified into two groups: MTX-treated or non-MTX-treated. All subjects had to show signs of active moderate or severe disease despite previous treatment with NSAIDs, analgesics, corticosteroids, or DMARDS. Subjects who received prior treatment with any biologic DMARDS were excluded from the study.
Generic Name: Adalimumab
- « Previous
- Clinical Pharmacology
- Next »
Joint Camp
Today, Baby Boomers go to "joint" camp to prepare for hip and knee replacement surgery. See more WebMD Videos »
Arthritis
Get the latest treatment options
