- « Previous
- Clinical Pharmacology
- Next »
Lorabid
Clinical Pharmacology
Lorabid
A report of "susceptible" implies that the pathogen is likely to be inhibited by generally achievable blood concentrations. A report of "moderately susceptible" indicates that inhibitory concentrations of the antibiotic may be achieved if high dosage is used or if the infection is confined to tissues and fluids (e.g., urine) in which high antibiotic concentrations are attained. A report of "resistant" indicates that achievable concentrations of the antibiotic are unlikely to be inhibitory and other therapy should be selected.
Standardized procedures require the use of laboratory control organisms. The 30-mcg loracarbef disk should give the following zone diameters with the NCCLS approved procedure (TABLE 3).
| TABLE 3 | |
| Organism | Zone Diameter (mm) |
|---|---|
| E. coli ATCC 25922 | 23-29 |
| S. aureus ATCC 25923 | 23-31 |
Dilution Techniques: Use a standardized dilution method2 (broth, agar, or microdilution) or equivalent with loracarbef powder. The MIC values obtained should be interpreted according to the following criteria (TABLE 4).
| TABLE 4 | |
| MIC (mcg/ml) | Interpretation |
|---|---|
| £8 | (S) Susceptible |
| 16 | (MS) Moderately Susceptible |
| ³32 | (R) Resistant |
As with standard diffusion methods, dilution procedures require the use of laboratory control organisms. Standard loracarbef powder should give the following MIC values with the NCCLS approved procedure (TABLE 5):
| TABLE 5 | |
| Organism | MIC Range (mcg/ml) |
|---|---|
| E. coli ATCC 25922 | 0.5-2 |
| S. aureus ATCC 29213 | 0.5-2 |
CLINICAL STUDIES
Study 1: In a controlled clinical study of acute otitis media performed in the United States where significant rates of b-lactamase-producing organisms were found, loracarbef was compared to an oral antimicrobial agent that contained a specific b-lactamase inhibitor. In this study, using very strict evaluability criteria and microbiologic and clinical response criteria at the 10- to 16-day post therapy follow-up, the following presumptive bacterial eradication/clinical cure outcomes (i.e., clinical success) and safety results were obtained (see TABLE 6).
| TABLE 6 U.S. Acute Otitis Media Study Loracarbef vs b-lactamase inhibitor-containing control drug | ||
| Efficacy | ||
| Pathogen | % of Cases With Pathogens (n=204) | Outcome |
|---|---|---|
| S. pneumoniae | 42.6% | Loracarbef equivalent to control |
| H. influenzae | 30.4% | Loracarbef success rate 9% less than control |
| M. catarrhalis | 20.6% | Loracarbef success rate 19% less than control |
| S. pyogenes | 6.4% | Loracarbef equivalent to control |
| Overall | 100.0% | Loracarbef success rate 12% less than control |
Generic Name: Loracarbef
- « Previous
- Clinical Pharmacology
- Next »
Herbal First Aid
Herbal medicine is ancient, but only in recent years have many people started to take notice of its all natural healing powers. See more WebMD Videos »
WebMD Daily
Get breaking medical news.
