M-M-R Ii
INDICATIONS
Recommended Vaccination Schedule
M-M-R II is indicated for simultaneous vaccination against measles, mumps, and rubella in individuals 12 months of age or older.
Individuals first vaccinated at 12 months of age or older should be revaccinated prior to elementary school entry. Revaccination may seroconvert primary failures or boost antibody titers of previously vaccinated individuals whose titers have declined. The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) recommends administration of the first dose of M-M-R II at 12-15 months of age and administration of the second dose of M-M-R II at 4-6 years of age. 59 In addition, some public health jurisdictions mandate the age for revaccination. Consult the complete text of applicable guidelines regarding routine revaccination including that of high-risk adult populations.
Measles Outbreak Schedule
Infants Between 6-12 Months of Age
Local health authorities may recommend measles vaccination of infants between 6-12 months of age in outbreak situations. This population may fail to respond to the components of the vaccine. Safety and effectiveness of mumps and rubella vaccine in infants less than 12 months of age have not been established. The younger the infant, the lower the likelihood of seroconversion (see CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY). Such infants should receive a second dose of M-M-R II between 12 to 15 months of age followed by revaccination at elementary school entry. 59
Unnecessary doses of a vaccine are best avoided by ensuring that written documentation of vaccination is preserved and a copy given to each vaccinees parent or guardian.
Other Vaccination Considerations
Non-Pregnant Adolescent and Adult Females
Immunization of susceptible non-pregnant adolescent and adult females of childbearing age with live attenuated rubella virus vaccine is indicated if certain precautions are observed (see below and PRECAUTIONS). Vaccinating susceptible postpubertal females confers individual protection against subsequently acquiring rubella infection during pregnancy, which in turn prevents infection of the fetus and consequent congenital rubella injury. 33
Women of childbearing age should be advised not to become pregnant for 3 months after vaccination and should be informed of the reasons for this precaution. ***
| *** |
NOTE: The ACIP has recommended "In view of the importance of protecting this age group against rubella, reasonable practices in a rubella immunization program include a) asking women if they are pregnant, b) excluding those who say they are, c) explaining the concern about risk for the fetus to the others, and d) explaining the importance of not becoming pregnant during the 3 months following vaccination." 33 |
The ACIP has stated "If it is practical and if reliable laboratory services are available, women of childbearing age who are potential candidates for vaccination can have serologic tests to determine susceptibility to rubella. However, with the exception of premarital and prenatal screening, routinely performing serologic tests for all women of childbearing age to determine susceptibility (so that vaccine is given only to proven susceptible women) can be effective but is expensive. Also, 2 visits to the health-care provider would be necessary - one for screening and one for vaccination. Accordingly, rubella vaccination of a woman who is not known to be pregnant and has no history of vaccination is justifiable without serologic testing - and may be preferable, particularly when costs of serology are high and follow-up of identified susceptible women for vaccination is not assured."33
Postpubertal females should be informed of the frequent occurrence of generally self-limited arthralgia and/or arthritis beginning 2 to 4 weeks after vaccination (see ADVERSE REACTIONS).
Postpartum Women
It has been found convenient in many instances to vaccinate rubella-susceptible women in the immediate postpartum period (see PRECAUTIONS: Nursing Mothers).
Other Populations
Previously unvaccinated children older than 12 months who are in contact with susceptible pregnant women should receive live attenuated rubella vaccine (such as that contained in monovalent rubella vaccine or in M-M-R II) to reduce the risk of exposure of the pregnant woman.
Individuals planning travel outside the United States, if not immune, can acquire measles, mumps or rubella and import these diseases into the United States. Therefore, prior to international travel, individuals known to be susceptible to one or more of these diseases can receive either a monovalent vaccine (measles, mumps or rubella), or a combination vaccine as appropriate. However, M-M-R II is preferred for persons likely to be susceptible to mumps and rubella; and if monovalent measles vaccine is not readily available, travelers should receive M-M-R II regardless of their immune status to mumps or rubella. 34-36
Vaccination is recommended for susceptible individuals in high-risk groups such as college students, health-care workers, and military personnel.33,34,37
According to ACIP recommendations, most persons born in 1956 or earlier are likely to have been infected with measles naturally and generally need not be considered susceptible. All children, adolescents, and adults born after 1956 are considered susceptible and should be vaccinated, if there are no contraindications. This includes persons who may be immune to measles but who lack adequate documentation of immunity such as: (1) physician-diagnosed measles, (2) laboratory evidence of measles immunity, or (3) adequate immunization with live measles vaccine on or after the first birthday. 34
The ACIP recommends that "Persons vaccinated with inactivated vaccine followed within 3 months by live vaccine should be revaccinated with two doses of live vaccine. Revaccination is particularly important when the risk of exposure to natural measles virus is increased, as may occur during international travel." 34
Post-Exposure Vaccination
Vaccination of individuals exposed to natural measles may provide some protection if the vaccine can be administered within 72 hours of exposure. If, however, vaccine is given a few days before exposure, substantial protection may be afforded. 34,38,39 There is no conclusive evidence that vaccination of individuals recently exposed to natural mumps or natural rubella will provide protection. 33,37
Use With Other Vaccines
DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION
FOR SUBCUTANEOUS ADMINISTRATION
Do not inject intravenously
The dose for any age is 0.5 mL administered subcutaneously, preferably into the outer aspect of the upper arm.
The recommended age for primary vaccination is 12 to 15 months.
Revaccination with M-M-R II is recommended prior to elementary school entry. See also INDICATIONS
: Recommended Vaccination Schedule.
Children first vaccinated when younger than 12 months of age should receive another dose between 12 to 15 months of age followed by revaccination prior to elementary school entry. 59 See also INDICATIONS
: Measles Outbreak Schedule.
Immune Globulin (IG) is not to be given concurrently with M-M-R II.
CAUTION: A sterile syringe free of preservatives, antiseptics, and detergents should be used for each injection and/or reconstitution of the vaccine because these substances may inactivate the live virus vaccine. A 25 gauge, 5/8" needle is recommended.
To reconstitute, use only the diluent supplied, since it is free of preservatives or other antiviral substances which might inactivate the vaccine.
Single Dose Vial: First withdraw the entire volume of diluent into the syringe to be used for reconstitution. Inject all the diluent in the syringe into the vial of lyophilized vaccine, and agitate to mix thoroughly. If the lyophilized vaccine cannot be dissolved, discard. Withdraw the entire contents into a syringe and inject the total volume of restored vaccine subcutaneously.
It is important to use a separate sterile syringe and needle for each individual patient to prevent transmission of hepatitis B and other infectious agents from one person to another.
10 Dose Vial (available only to government agencies/institutions): Withdraw the entire contents (7 mL) of the diluent vial into the sterile syringe to be used for reconstitution, and introduce into the 10 dose vial of lyophilized vaccine. Agitate to ensure thorough mixing. If the lyophilized vaccine cannot be dissolved, discard. The outer labeling suggests "For Jet Injector or Syringe Use." Use with separate sterile syringes is permitted for containers of 10 doses or less. The vaccine and diluent do not contain preservatives; therefore, the user must recognize the potential contamination hazards and exercise special precautions to protect the sterility and potency of the product. The use of aseptic techniques and proper storage prior to and after restoration of the vaccine and subsequent withdrawal of the individual doses is essential. Use 0.5 mL of the reconstituted vaccine for subcutaneous injection.
It is important to use a separate sterile syringe and needle for each individual patient to prevent transmission of hepatitis B and other infectious agents from one person to another.
Parenteral drug products should be inspected visually for particulate matter and discoloration prior to administration whenever solution and container permit. M-M-R II, when reconstituted, is clear yellow.
M-M-R II should be given one month before or after administration of other live viral vaccines.
M-M-R II has been administered concurrently with VARIVAX* [Varicella Virus Vaccine Live (Oka/Merck)], and PedvaxHIB* [Haemophilus b Conjugate Vaccine (Meningococcal Protein Conjugate)] using separate sites and syringes. No impairment of immune response to individual tested vaccine antigens was demonstrated. The type, frequency, and severity of adverse experiences observed with M-M-R II were similar to those seen when each vaccine was given alone.
Routine administration of DTP (diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis) and/or OPV (oral poliovirus vaccine) concurrently with measles, mumps and rubella vaccines is not recommended because there are limited data relating to the simultaneous administration of these antigens.
However, other schedules have been used. The ACIP has stated "Although data are limited concerning the simultaneous administration of the entire recommended vaccine series (i.e., DTP, OPV, MMR, and Hib vaccines, with or without hepatitis B vaccine), data from numerous studies have indicated no interference between routinely recommended childhood vaccines (either live, attenuated, or killed). These findings support the simultaneous use of all vaccines as recommended." 32
HOW SUPPLIED
No.4749 - M-M-R II is supplied as a single-dose vial of lyophilized vaccine, NDC 0006-4749-00, and a vial of diluent.
No.4681/4309 M-M-R II is supplied as follows: (1) a box of 10 single-dose vials of lyophilized vaccine (package A), NDC 0006-4681-00; and (2) a box of 10 vials of diluent (package B). To conserve refrigerator space, the diluent may be stored separately at room temperature.
Available only to government agencies/institutions:
No.4682X M-M-R II is supplied as one 10 dose vial of lyophilized vaccine.
NDC 0006-4682-00, and one 7 mL vial of diluent.
Storage
During shipment, to ensure that there is no loss of potency, the vaccine must be maintained at a temperature of 10° C (50° F) or colder. Freezing during shipment will not affect potency.
Protect the vaccine from light at all times, since such exposure may inactivate the virus.
Before reconstitution, store the vial of lyophilized vaccine at 2-8° C (36-46° F) or colder. The diluent may be stored in the refrigerator with the lyophilized vaccine or separately at room temperature.
It is recommended that the vaccine be used as soon as possible after reconstitution. Store reconstituted vaccine in the vaccine vial in a dark place at 2-8° C (36-46° F) and discard if not used within 8 hours.
REFERENCES
1. Plotkin, S. A.; Cornfeld, D.; Ingalls, T. H.: Studies of immunization with living rubella virus: Trials in children with a strain cultured from an aborted fetus, Am. J. Dis. Child. 110:381-389, 1965.
2. Plotkin, S. A.; Farquhar, J.; Katz, M.; Ingalls, T. H.: A new attenuated rubella virus grown in human fibroblasts: Evidence for reduced nasopharyngeal excretion, Am. J. Epidemiol. 86:468-477, 1967.
3. Monthly Immunization Table, MMWR 45(1):24-25, January 12, 1996.
4. Johnson, C. E.; et al: Measles Vaccine Immunogenicity in 6-Versus 15-Month-Old Infants Born to Mothers in the Measles Vaccine Era, Pediatrics, 93(6):939-943, 1994.
5. Linneman, C. C.; et al: Measles Immunity After Vaccination: Results in Children Vaccinated Before 10 Months of Age, Pediatrics, 69(3):332-335, March 1982.
6. Stetler, H. C.; et al: Impact of Revaccinating Children Who Initially Received Measles Vaccine Before 10 Months of Age, Pediatrics 77(4):471-476, April 1986.
7. Hilleman, M. R.; Buynak, E. B.; Weibel, R. E.; et al: Development and Evaluation of the Moraten Measles Virus Vaccine, JAMA 206(3):587-590, 1968.
8. Weibel, R. E.; Stokes, J.; Buynak, E. B.; et al: Live, Attenuated Mumps Virus Vaccine 3. Clinical and Serologic Aspects in a Field Evaluation, N. Engl. J. Med. 276:245-251, 1967.
9. Hilleman, M. R.; Weibel, R. E.; Buynak, E. B.; et al: Live, Attenuated Mumps Virus Vaccine 4. Protective Efficacy as Measured in a Field Evaluation, N. Engl. J. Med. 276:252-258, 1967.
10. Cutts, F. T.; Henderson, R. H.; Clements, C. J.; et al: Principles of measles control, Bull WHO 69(1):1-7, 1991.
11. Weibel, R. E.; Buynak, E. B.; Stokes, J.; et al: Evaluation Of Live Attenuated Mumps Virus Vaccine, Strain Jeryl Lynn, First International Conference on Vaccines Against Viral and Rickettsial Diseases of Man, World Health Organization, No. 147, May, 1967.
12. Leibhaber, H.; Ingalls, T. H.; LeBouvier, G. L.; et al: Vaccination With RA 27/3 Rubella Vaccine, Am. J. Dis. Child. 123:133-136, February, 1972.
13. Rosen, L.: Hemagglutination and Hemagglutination-Inhibition with Measles Virus, Virology 13:139-141, January, 1961.
14. Brown, G. C.; et al: Fluorescent-Antibody Marker for Vaccine-Induced Rubella Antibodies, Infection and Immunity 2(4):360-363, 1970.
15. Buynak, E. B.; et al: Live Attenuated Mumps Virus Vaccine 1. Vaccine Development, Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine, 123:768-775, 1966.
16. Weibel, R. E.; Carlson, A. J.; Villarejos, V. M.; Buynak, E. B.; McLean, A. A.; Hilleman, M. R.: Clinical and Laboratory Studies of Combined Live Measles, Mumps, and Rubella Vaccines Using the RA 27/3 Rubella Virus, Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med. 165:323-326, 1980.
17. Unpublished data from the files of Merck Research Laboratories.
18. Watson, J. C.; Pearson, J. S.; Erdman, D. D.; et al: An Evaluation of Measles Revaccination Among School-Entry Age Children, 31st Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, Abstract #268,143,1991.
19. Fogel, A.; Moshkowitz, A.; Rannon, L.; Gerichter, Ch. B.: Comparative trials of RA 27/3 and Cendehill rubella vaccines in adult and adolescent females, Am. J. Epidemiol. 93:392-393, 1971.
20. Andzhaparidze, O. G.; Desyatskova, R. G.; Chervonski, G. I.; Pryanichnikova, L. V.: Immunogenicity and reactogenicity of live attenuated rubella virus vaccines, Am. J. Epidemiol. 91:527-530, 1970.
21. Freestone, D. S.; Reynolds, G. M.; McKinnon, J. A.; Prydie, J.: Vaccination of schoolgirls against rubella. Assessment of serological status and a comparative trial of Wistar RA 27/3 and Cendehill strain live attenuated rubella vaccines in 13-year-old schoolgirls in Dudley, Br. J. Prev. Soc. Med. 29:258-261, 1975.
22. Grillner, L.; Hedstrom, C. E.; Bergstrom, H.; Forssman, L.; Rigner, A.; Lycke, E.: Vaccination against rubella of newly delivered women, Scand. J. Infect. Dis. 5:237-241, 1973.
23. Grillner, L.: Neutralizing antibodies after rubella vaccination of newly delivered women: a comparison between three vaccines, Scand. J. Infect. Dis. 7:169-172, 1975.
24. Wallace, R. B.; Isacson, P.: Comparative trial of HPV-77, DE-5 and RA 27/3 live-attenuated rubella vaccines, Am. J. Dis. Child. 124:536-538, 1972.
25. Lalla, M.; Vesikari, T.; Virolainen, M.: Lymphoblast proliferation and humoral antibody response after rubella vaccination, Clin. Exp. Immunol. 15:193-202, 1973.
26. LeBouvier, G. L.; Plotkin, S. A.: Precipitin responses to rubella vaccine RA 27/3, J. Infect. Dis. 123:220-223, 1971.
27. Horstmann, D. M.: Rubella: The challenge of its control, J. Infect. Dis. 123:640-654, 1971.
28. Ogra, P. L.; Kerr-Grant, D.; Umana, G.; Dzierba, J.; Weintraub, D.: Antibody response in serum and nasopharynx after naturally acquired and vaccine-induced infection with rubella virus, N. Engl. J. Med. 285:1333-1339, 1971.
29. Plotkin, S. A.; Farquhar, J. D.; Ogra, P. L.: Immunologic properties of RA 27/3 rubella virus vaccine, J. Am. Med. Assoc. 225:585-590, 1973.
30. Liebhaber, H.; Ingalls, T. H.; LeBouvier, G. L.; Horstmann, D. M.: Vaccination with RA 27/3 rubella vaccine. Persistence of immunity and resistance to challenge after two years, Am. J. Dis. Child. 123:133-136, 1972.
31. Farquhar, J. D.: Follow-up on rubella vaccinations and experience with subclinical reinfection, J. Pediatr. 81:460-465, 1972.
32. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Recommended childhood immunization schedule United States, January-June 1996, MMWR 44(51 & 52):940-943, January 5, 1996.
33. Rubella Prevention: Recommendation of the Immunization Practices Advisory Committee (ACIP), MMWR 39(RR-15), 1-18, November 23, 1990.
34. Measles Prevention: Recommendations of the Immunization Practices Advisory Committee (ACIP), MMWR 38(S-9): 5-22, December 29, 1989.
35. Jong, E. C., The Travel and Tropical Medicine Manual, W. B. Saunders Company, p. 12-16, 1987.
36. Committee on Immunization Council of Medical Societies, American College of Physicians, Phila., PA, Guide for Adult Immunization, First Edition, 1985.
37. Recommendations of the Immunization Practices Advisory Committee (ACIP), Mumps Prevention, MMWR 38(22):388-400, June 9, 1989.
38. King, G. E.; Markowitz, L. E.; Patriarca, P. A.; et al: Clinical Efficacy of Measles Vaccine During the 1990 Measles Epidemic, Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J.10(12):883-888, December 1991.
39. Krasinski, K.; Borkowsky, W.: Measles and Measles Immunity in Children Infected With Human Immunodeficiency Virus, JAMA 261(17):2512-2516, 1989.
40. Kelso, J. M.; Jones, R. T.; Yunginger, J. W.: Anaphylaxis to measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine mediated by IgE to gelatin, J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 91: 867-872, 1993.
41. General Recommendations on Immunization, Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, MMWR 43(RR-1):1-38, January 28, 1994.
42. Center for Disease Control: Immunization of Children Infected with Human T-Lymphotropic Virus Type III/Lymphadenopathy-Associated Virus, Annals of Internal Medicine, 106:75-78, 1987.
43. Krasinski, K.; Borkowsky, W.; Krugman, S.: Antibody following measles immunization in children infected with human T-cell lymphotropic virus-type III/lymphadenopathy associated virus (HTLV-III/LAV) [Abstract]. In: Program and abstracts of the International Conference on Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome, Paris, France, June 23-25, 1986.
44. Peter, G.; et al (eds): Report of the Committee on Infectious Diseases, Twenty-fourth Edition, American Academy of Pediatrics, 344-357, 1997.
45. Isaacs, D.; Menser, M.: Modern Vaccines, Measles, Mumps, Rubella, and Varicella, Lancet 335:1384-1387, June 9, 1990.
46. Starr, S.; Berkovich, S.: The effect of measles, gamma globulin modified measles, and attenuated measles vaccine on the course of treated tuberculosis in children, Pediatrics 35:97-102, January, 1965.
47. Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System United States, MMWR 39(41):730-733, October 19, 1990.
48. Rubella vaccination during pregnancy United States, 1971-1981. MMWR 31(35):477-481, September 10, 1982.
49. Losonsky, G. A.; Fishaut, J. M.; Strussenber, J.; Ogra, P. L.: Effect of immunization against rubella on lactation products. II. Maternal-neonatal interactions, J. Infect. Dis. 145:661-666, 1982.
50. Landes, R. D.; Bass, J. W.; Millunchick, E. W.; Oetgen, W. J.: Neonatal rubella following postpartum maternal immunization, J. Pediatr. 97:465-467, 1980.
51. Lerman, S. J.: Neonatal rubella following postpartum maternal immunization, J. Pediatr. 98:668, 1981. (Letter)
52. Gershon, A.; et al: Live attenuated rubella virus vaccine: comparison of responses to HPV-77-DE5 and RA 27/3 strains, Am. J. Med. Sci. 279(2):95-97, 1980.
53. Weibel, R. E.; et al: Clinical and laboratory studies of live attenuated RA 27/3 and HPV-77-DE rubella virus vaccines, Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med. 165:44-49, 1980.
54. CDC. Important Information about Measles, Mumps, and Rubella, and Measles, Mumps, and Rubella Vaccines.1980. 1983.
55. CDC, Measles Surveillance, Report No. 11, p. 14, September, 1982.
56. Peltola, H.; et al: The elimination of indigenous measles, mumps, and rubella from Finland by a 12-year, two dose vaccination program. N. Engl. J. Med. 331:1397-1402, 1994.
57. Eberhart-Phillips, J. E.; et al: Measles in pregnancy: a descriptive study of 58 cases. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 82(5):797-801, Nov. 1993.
58. Jespersen, C. S.; et al: Measles as a cause of fetal defects: A retrospective study of ten measles epidemics in Greenland. Acta Paediatr Scand 66:367-372, May 1977.
59. Measles, Mumps, and Rubella Vaccine Use and Strategies for Elimination of Measles, Rubella, and Congenital Rubella Syndrome and Control of Mumps: Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), MMWR 47(RR-8), May 22, 1998.
60. Bitnum, A.; et al: Measles Inclusion Body Encephalitis Caused by the Vaccine Strain of Measles Virus. Clin. Infect. Dis. 29:855-861, 1999.
61. Angel, J. B.; et al; Vaccine Associated Measles Pneumonitis in an Adult with AIDS. Annals of Internal Medicine, 129:104-106,1998.
Generic Name: Measles, Mumps, and Rubella Virus Vaccine Live
Report Problems to the Food and Drug Administration
You are encouraged to report negative side effects of prescription drugs to the FDA. Visit the FDA MedWatch website or call 1-800-FDA-1088.
Parenting and Pregnancy
Get tips for baby and you.
Health Extras
Overscheduled Families
Do you run your kids from one activity to another, day after day? If so, you should take a minute to watch.See more WebMD Videos »
