Cimzia
Is a New Crohn's Disease Treatment on the Horizon? »
"Oct. 17, 2012 -- A drug used to treat psoriasis may provide a much-needed option for people with bad cases of Crohn's disease.
In the new study, some people with moderate to severe Crohn's given Stelara (ustekinumab) began to see imp"...
Read the Is a New Crohn's Disease Treatment on the Horizon? article »
Cimzia
CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY
Mechanism of Action
Certolizumab pegol binds to human TNFα with a KD of 90pM. TNFα is a key proinflammatory cytokine with a central role in inflammatory processes. Certolizumab pegol selectively neutralizes TNFα (IC90 of 4 ng/mL for inhibition of human TNFα in the in vitro L929 murine fibrosarcoma cytotoxicity assay) but does not neutralize lymphotoxin α (TNFβ). Certolizumab pegol cross-reacts poorly with TNF from rodents and rabbits, therefore in vivo efficacy was evaluated using animal models in which human TNFα was the physiologically active molecule.
Certolizumab pegol was shown to neutralize membrane-associated and soluble human TNFα in a dose-dependent manner. Incubation of monocytes with certolizumab pegol resulted in a dosedependent inhibition of LPS-induced TNFα and IL-1β production in human monocytes.
Certolizumab pegol does not contain a fragment crystallizable (Fc) region, which is normally present in a complete antibody, and therefore does not fix complement or cause antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity in vitro . It does not induce apoptosis in vitro in human peripheral bloodderived monocytes or lymphocytes, nor does certolizumab pegol induce neutrophil degranulation.
A tissue reactivity study was carried out ex vivo to evaluate potential cross-reactivity of certolizumab pegol with cryosections of normal human tissues. Certolizumab pegol showed no reactivity with a designated standard panel of normal human tissues.
Pharmacodynamics
Biological activities ascribed to TNFα include the upregulation of cellular adhesion molecules and chemokines, upregulation of major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I and class II molecules, and direct leukocyte activation. TNFα stimulates the production of downstream inflammatory mediators, including interleukin-1, prostaglandins, platelet activating factor, and nitric oxide. Elevated levels of TNFα have been implicated in the pathology of Crohn's disease and rheumatoid arthritis. Certolizumab pegol binds to TNFα, inhibiting its role as a key mediator of inflammation. TNFα is strongly expressed in the bowel wall in areas involved by Crohn's disease and fecal concentrations of TNFα in patients with Crohn's disease have been shown to reflect clinical severity of the disease. After treatment with certolizumab pegol, patients with Crohn's disease demonstrated a decrease in the levels of C-reactive protein (CRP). Increased TNFα levels are found in the synovial fluid of rheumatoid arthritis patients and play an important role in the joint destruction that is a hallmark of this disease.
Pharmacokinetics
Absorption
A total of 126 healthy subjects received doses of up to 800 mg certolizumab pegol subcutaneously (sc) and up to 10 mg/kg intravenously (IV) in four pharmacokinetic studies. Data from these studies demonstrate that single intravenous and subcutaneous doses of certolizumab pegol have predictable dose-related plasma concentrations with a linear relationship between the dose administered and the maximum plasma concentration (Cmax), and the Area Under the certolizumab pegol plasma concentration versus time Curve (AUC). A mean Cmax of approximately 43 to 49 mcg/mL occurred at Week 5 during the initial loading dose period using the recommended dose regimen for the treatment of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (400 mg sc at Weeks 0, 2 and 4 followed by 200 mg every other week).
Certolizumab pegol plasma concentrations were broadly dose-proportional and pharmacokinetics observed in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and Crohn's disease were consistent with those seen in healthy subjects.
Following subcutaneous administration, peak plasma concentrations of certolizumab pegol were attained between 54 and 171 hours post-injection. Certolizumab pegol has bioavailability (F) of approximately 80% (ranging from 76% to 88%) following subcutaneous administration compared to intravenous administration.
Distribution
The steady state volume of distribution (Vss) was estimated as 6 to 8 L in the population pharmacokinetic analysis for patients with Crohn's disease and patients with rheumatoid arthritis.
Metabolism
The metabolism of certolizumab pegol has not been studied in human subjects. Data from animals indicate that once cleaved from the Fab' fragment the PEG moiety is mainly excreted in urine without further metabolism.
Elimination
PEGylation, the covalent attachment of PEG polymers to peptides, delays the metabolism and elimination of these entities from the circulation by a variety of mechanisms, including decreased renal clearance, proteolysis, and immunogenicity. Accordingly, certolizumab pegol is an antibody Fab' fragment conjugated with PEG in order to extend the terminal plasma elimination half-life (t½) of the Fab'. The terminal elimination phase half-life (t½) was approximately 14 days for all doses tested. The clearance following IV administration to healthy subjects ranged from 9.21 mL/h to 14.38 mL/h. The clearance following sc dosing was estimated 17 mL/h in the Crohn's disease population PK analysis with an inter-subject variability of 38% (CV) and an inter-occasion variability of 16%. Similarly, the clearance following sc dosing was estimated as 21.0 mL/h in the RA population PK analysis, with an inter-subject variability of 30.8% (%CV) and inter-occasion variability 22.0%. The route of elimination of certolizumab pegol has not been studied in human subjects. Studies in animals indicate that the major route of elimination of the PEG component is via urinary excretion.
Special Populations
Population pharmacokinetic analysis was conducted on data from patients with rheumatoid arthritis and patients with Crohn's disease, to evaluate the effect of age, race, gender, methotrexate use, concomitant medication, creatinine clearance and presence of anti-certolizumab antibodies on pharmacokinetics of certolizumab pegol.
Only bodyweight and presence of anti-certolizumab antibodies significantly affected certolizumab pegol pharmacokinetics. Pharmacokinetic exposure was inversely related to body weight but pharmacodynamic exposure-response analysis showed that no additional therapeutic benefit would be expected from a weight-adjusted dose regimen. The presence of anti-certolizumab antibodies was associated with a 3.6-fold increase in clearance.
Age: Pharmacokinetics of certolizumab pegol was not different in elderly compared to young adults.
Gender: Pharmacokinetics of certolizumab pegol was similar in male and female subjects.
Renal Impairment: Specific clinical studies have not been performed to assess the effect of renal impairment on the pharmacokinetics of CIMZIA. The pharmacokinetics of the PEG (polyethylene glycol) fraction of certolizumab pegol is expected to be dependent on renal function but has not been assessed in renal impairment. There are insufficient data to provide a dosing recommendation in moderate and severe renal impairment.
Race: A specific clinical study showed no difference in pharmacokinetics between Caucasian and Japanese subjects.
Drug Interaction Studies
Methotrexate pharmacokinetics is not altered by concomitant administration with CIMZIA in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. The effect of methotrexate on CIMZIA pharmacokinetics was not studied. However, methotrexate-treated patients have lower incidence of antibodies to CIMZIA. Thus, therapeutic plasma levels are more likely to be sustained when CIMZIA is administered with methotrexate in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.
Formal drug-drug interaction studies have not been conducted with CIMZIA upon concomitant administration with corticosteroids, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, analgesics or immunosupressants.
Clinical Studies
Crohn's Disease
The efficacy and safety of CIMZIA were assessed in two double-blind, randomized, placebocontrolled studies in patients aged 18 years and older with moderately to severely active Crohn's disease, as defined by a Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI1) of 220 to 450 points, inclusive. CIMZIA was administered subcutaneously at a dose of 400 mg in both studies. Stable concomitant medications for Crohn's disease were permitted.
Study CD1
Study CD1 was a randomized placebo-controlled study in 662 patients with active Crohn's disease. CIMZIA or placebo was administered at Weeks 0, 2, and 4 and then every four weeks to Week 24. Assessments were done at Weeks 6 and 26. Clinical response was defined as at least a 100-point reduction in CDAI score compared to baseline, and clinical remission was defined as an absolute CDAI score of 150 points or lower.
The results for Study CD1 are provided in Table 2. At Week 6, the proportion of clinical responders was statistically significantly greater for CIMZIA-treated patients compared to controls. The difference in clinical remission rates was not statistically significant at Week 6. The difference in the proportion of patients who were in clinical response at both Weeks 6 and 26 was also statistically significant, demonstrating maintenance of clinical response.
Table 2 : Study CD1 – Clinical Response and Remission,
Overall Study Population
| Timepoint | % Response or Remission (95% CI) | |
| Placebo (N = 328) |
CIMZIA 400 mg (N = 331) |
|
| Week 6 | ||
| Clinical Response# | 27% (22%, 32%) | 35% (30%, 40%)* |
| Clinical Remission# | 17% (13%, 22%) | 22% (17%, 26%) |
| Week 26 | ||
| Clinical Response | 27% (22%, 31%) | 37% (32%, 42%)* |
| Clinical Remission | 18% (14%, 22%) | 29% (25%, 34%)* |
| Both Weeks 6 & 26 | ||
| Clinical Response | 16% (12%, 20%) | 23% (18%, 28%)* |
| Clinical Remission | 10% (7%, 13%) | 14% (11%, 18%) |
| * p-value < 0.05 logistic regression test # Clinical response is defined as decrease in CDAI of at least 100 points, and clinical remission is defined as CDAI ≤ 150 points |
||
Study CD2
Study CD2 was a randomized treatment-withdrawal study in patients with active Crohn's disease. All patients who entered the study were dosed initially with CIMZIA 400 mg at Weeks 0, 2, and 4 and then assessed for clinical response at Week 6 (as defined by at least a 100-point reduction in CDAI score). At Week 6, a group of 428 clinical responders was randomized to receive either CIMZIA 400 mg or placebo, every four weeks starting at Week 8, as maintenance therapy through Week 24. Non-responders at Week 6 were withdrawn from the study. Final evaluation was based on the CDAI score at Week 26. Patients who withdrew or who received rescue therapy were considered not to be in clinical response. Three randomized responders received no study injections, and were excluded from the ITT analysis.
The results for clinical response and remission are shown in Table 3. At Week 26, a statistically significantly greater proportion of Week 6 responders were in clinical response and in clinical remission in the CIMZIA-treated group compared to the group treated with placebo.
Table 3 : Study CD2 - Clinical Response and Clinical
Remission
| % Response or Remission (95% CI) | ||
| CIMZIA 400 mg x3 + Placebo N = 210 |
CIMZIA 400 mg N = 215 |
|
| Week 26 | ||
| Clinical Response# | 36% (30%, 43%) | 63% (56%, 69%)* |
| Clinical Remission# | 29% (22%, 35%) | 48% (41%, 55%)* |
| * p < 0.05 # Clinical response is defined as decrease in CDAI of at least 100 points, and clinical remission is defined as CDAI ≤ 150 points |
||
Baseline use of immunosuppressants or corticosteroids had no impact on the clinical response to CIMZIA.
Rheumatoid Arthritis
The efficacy and safety of CIMZIA were assessed in four randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind studies (RA-I, RA-II, RA-III, and RA-IV ) in patients ≥ 18 years of age with moderately to severely active rheumatoid arthritis diagnosed according to the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria. Patients had ≥ 9 swollen and tender joints and had active RA for at least 6 months prior to baseline. CIMZIA was administered subcutaneously in combination with MTX at stable doses of at least 10 mg weekly in Studies RA-I, RA-II, and RA-III. CIMZIA was administered as monotherapy in Study RA-IV.
Study RA-I and Study RA-II evaluated patients who had received MTX for at least 6 months prior to study medication, but had an incomplete response to MTX alone. Patients were treated with a loading dose of 400 mg at Weeks 0, 2 and 4 (for both treatment arms) or placebo followed by either 200 mg or 400 mg of CIMZIA or placebo every other week, in combination with MTX for 52 weeks in Study RA-I and for 24 weeks in Study RA-II. Patients were evaluated for signs and symptoms and structural damage using the ACR20 response at Week 24 (RA-I and RA-II) and modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) at Week 52 (RA-I). The open-label extension follow-up study enrolled 846 patients who received 400 mg of CIMZIA every other week.
Study RA-III evaluated 247 patients who had active disease despite receiving MTX for at least 6 months prior to study enrollment. Patients received 400 mg of CIMZIA every four weeks for 24 weeks without a prior loading dose. Patients were evaluated for signs and symptoms of RA using the ACR20 at Week 24.
Study RA-IV (monotherapy) evaluated 220 patients who had failed at least one DMARD use prior to receiving CIMZIA. Patients were treated with CIMZIA 400 mg or placebo every 4 weeks for 24 weeks. Patients were evaluated for signs and symptoms of active RA using the ACR20 at Week 24.
Clinical Response
The percent of CIMZIA-treated patients achieving ACR20, 50, and 70 responses in Studies RA-I and RA-IV are shown in Table 4. CIMZIA-treated patients had higher ACR20, 50 and 70 response rates at 6 months compared to placebo-treated patients. The results in study RA-II (619 patients) were similar to the results in RA-I at Week 24. The results in study RA-III (247 patients) were similar to those seen in study RA-IV. Over the one-year Study RA-I, 13% of CIMZIA-treated patients achieved a major clinical response, defined as achieving an ACR70 response over a continuous 6-month period, compared to 1% of placebo-treated patients.
Table 4: ACR Responses in Studies RA-I, and RA-IV
(Percent of Patients)
| Response | Study RA-I Methotrexate Combination (24 and 52 weeks) | Study RA-IV Monotherapy (24 weeks) | ||||
| Placebo +MTX N=199 |
CIMZIAa 200mg + MTXq 2 weeks N=393 |
CIMZIAa 200mg + MTX -Placebo + MTX (95% CI)d | Placebo N=109 |
CIMZIAb400 mgq 4 weeks N=111 |
CIMZIAb 400mg - Placebo (95% CI)d | |
| ACR20 | ||||||
| Week 24 | 14% | 59% | 45% (38%, 52%) | 9% | 46% | 36% (25%, 47%) |
| Week 52 | 13% | 53% | 40% (33%, 47%) | N/A | N/A | |
| ACR50 | ||||||
| Week 24 | 8% | 37% | 30% (24%, 36%) | 4% | 23% | 19% (10%, 28%) |
| Week 52 | 8% | 38% | 30% (24%, 37%) | N/A | N/A | |
| ACR70 | ||||||
| Week 24 | 3% | 21% | 18% (14%, 23%) | 0% | 6% | 6% (1%, 10%) |
| Week 52 | 4% | 21% | 18% (13%, 22%) | N/A | N/A | |
| Major | ||||||
| Clinical Responsec | 1% | 13% | 12% (8%, 15%) | |||
| a CIMZIA administered every 2 weeks preceded
by a loading dose of 400 mg at Weeks 0, 2 and 4 b CIMZIA administered every 4 weeks not preceded by a loading dose regimen c Major clinical response is defined as achieving ACR70 response over a continuous 6-month period d 95% Confidence Intervals constructed using the large sample approximation to the Normal Distribution. |
||||||
Table 5: Components of ACR Response in Studies RA-I
and RA-IV
| Parameter+ | Study RA-I | Study RA-IV | ||||||
| Placebo + MTX N=199 |
CIMZIAa 200 mg + MTX q 2 weeks N=393 |
Placebo + MTX N=109 |
CIMZIAb 400 mg q 4 weeks Monotherapy N=111 |
|||||
| Baseline | Week 24 | Baseline | Week 24 | Baseline | Week 24 | Baseline | Week 24 | |
| Number of tender joints (0-68) | 28 | 27 | 29 | 9 | 28 (12.5) | 24 (15.4) | 30 (13.7) | 16 (15.8) |
| Number of swollen joints (0-66) | 20 | 19 | 20 | 4 | 20 (9.3) | 16 (12.5) | 21 (10.1) | 12 (11.2) |
| Physician global assessmentc | 66 | 56 | 65 | 25 | 4 (0.6) | 3 (1.0) | 4 (0.7) | 3 (1.1) |
| Patient global assessmentc | 67 | 60 | 64 | 32 | 3 (0.8) | 3 (1.0) | 3 (0.8) | 3 (1.0) |
| Painc,d | 65 | 60 | 65 | 32 | 55 (20.8) | 60 (26.7) | 58 (21.9) | 39 (29.6) |
| Disability index | 1.75 | 1.63 | 1.75 | 1.00 | 1.55 (0.65) | 1.62 (0.68) | 1.43 (0.63) | 1.04 (0.74) |
| (HAQ)e CRP (mg/L) | 16.0 | 14.0 | 16.0 | 4.0 | 11.3 | 13.5 | 11.6 | 6.4 |
| a CIMZIA administered every 2 weeks preceded
by a loading dose of 400 mg at Weeks 0, 2 and 4 b CIMZIA administered every 4 weeks not preceded by a loading dose regimen c Study RA-I - Visual Analog Scale: 0 = best, 100 = worst. Study RA-IV - Five Point Scale: 1 = best, 5 =worst d Patient Assessment of Arthritis Pain. Visual Analog Scale: 0 = best, 100 = worst e Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index; 0 = best, 3 = worst, measures the patient's ability to perform the following: dress/groom, arise, eat, walk, reach, grip, maintain hygiene, and maintain daily activity All values are last observation carried forward. +For Study RA-I, median is presented. For Study RA-IV, mean (SD) is presented except for CRP which presents geometric mean |
||||||||
The percent of patients achieving ACR20 responses by visit for Study RA-I is shown in Figure 1. Among patients receiving CIMZIA, clinical responses were seen in some patients within one to two weeks after initiation of therapy.
Figure 1 : Study RA-I
ACR20 Response Over 52 Weeks*
![]() |
Radiographic Response
In Study RA-I, inhibition of progression of structural damage was assessed radiographically and expressed as the change in modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) and its components, the Erosion Score (ES) and Joint Space Narrowing (JSN) score, at Week 52, compared to baseline. CIMZIA inhibited the progression of structural damage compared to placebo plus MTX after 12 months of treatment as shown in Table 6. In the placebo group, 52% of patients experienced no radiographic progression (mTSS ≤ 0.0) at Week 52 compared to 69% in the CIMZIA 200 mg every other week treatment group. Study RA-II showed similar results at Week 24.
Table 6: Radiographic Changes at 6 and 12 months in
Study RA-I
| Placebo + MTX N=199 Mean (SD) |
CIMZIA 200 mg + MTX N=393 Mean (SD) |
CIMZIA 200 mg + MTX -Placebo + MTX Mean Difference |
|
| mTSS | |||
| Baseline | 40 (45) | 38 (49) | - |
| Week 24 | 1.3 (3.8) | 0.2 (3.2) | -1.1 |
| Week 52 | 2.8 (7.8) | 0.4 (5.7) | -2.4 |
| Erosion Score | |||
| Baseline | 14 (21) | 15 (24) | - |
| Week 24 | 0.7 (2.1) | 0.0 (1.5) | -0.7 |
| Week 52 | 1.5 (4.3) | 0.1 (2.5) | -1.4 |
| JSN Score | |||
| Baseline | 25 (27) | 24 (28) | - |
| Week 24 | 0.7 (2.4) | 0.2 (2.5) | -0.5 |
| Week 52 | 1.4 (5.0) | 0.4 (4.2) | -1.0 |
An ANCOVA was fitted to the ranked change from baseline for each measure with region and treatment as factors and rank baseline as a covariate.
Physical Function Response
In studies RA-I, RA-II, RA-III, and RA-IV, CIMZIA-treated patients achieved greater improvements from baseline than placebo-treated patients in physical function as assessed by the Health Assessment Questionnaire – Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at Week 24 (RA-II, RA-III and RAIV) and at Week 52 (RA-I).
REFERENCES
1. Best WR, Becktel JM, Singleton JW, Kern F: Development of a Crohn's Disease Activity Index, National Cooperative Crohn's Disease Study. Gastroenterology 1976; 70(3): 439-444
Last reviewed on RxList: 11/26/2012
This monograph has been modified to include the generic and brand name in many instances.
Additional Cimzia Information
Cimzia - User Reviews
Report Problems to the Food and Drug Administration
You are encouraged to report negative side effects of prescription drugs to the FDA. Visit the FDA MedWatch website or call 1-800-FDA-1088.
Women's Health
Find out what women really need.







