Absorption
CIPRO XR tablets are formulated to release drug at a slower rate compared to
immediate-release tablets. Approximately 35% of the dose is contained within
an immediate-release component, while the remaining 65% is contained in a slow-release
matrix.
Maximum plasma ciprofloxacin concentrations are attained between 1 and 4 hours
after dosing with CIPRO XR. In comparison to the 250 mg and 500 mg ciprofloxacin
immediate-release BID treatment, the Cmax of CIPRO XR 500 mg and 1000 mg once
daily are higher than the corresponding BID doses, while the AUCs over 24 hours
are equivalent.
The following table compares the pharmacokinetic parameters obtained at steady
state for these four treatment regimens (500 mg QD CIPRO XR versus 250 mg BID
ciprofloxacin immediate-release tablets and 1000 mg QD CIPRO XR versus 500 mg
BID ciprofloxacin immediate-release).
Ciprofloxacin Pharmacokinetics (Mean ± SD) Following
CIPRO® and CIPRO XR Administration
| |
Cmax (mg/L) |
AUC0-24h (mg•h/L) |
T½ (hr) |
Tmax (hr) § |
| CIPRO XR 500 mg QD |
1.59 ± 0.43 |
7.97 ± 1.87 |
6.6 ± 1.4 |
1.5 (1.0 - 2.5) |
| CIPRO 250 mg BID |
1.14 ± 0.23 |
8.25 ± 2.15 |
4.8 ± 0.6 |
1.0 (0.5 - 2.5) |
| CIPRO XR 1000 mg QD |
3.11 ± 1.08 |
16.83 ± 5.65 |
6.31 ± 0.72 |
2.0 (1 - 4) |
| CIPRO 500 mg BID |
2.06 ± 0.41 |
17.04 ± 4.79 |
5.66 ± 0.89 |
2.0 (0.5 - 3.5) |
| § median (range) |
Results of the pharmacokinetic studies demonstrate that CIPRO XR may be administered
with or without food (e.g. high-fat and low-fat meals or under fasted conditions).
Distribution
The volume of distribution calculated for intravenous ciprofloxacin is approximately
2.1 - 2.7 L/kg. Studies with the oral and intravenous forms of ciprofloxacin
have demonstrated penetration of ciprofloxacin into a variety of tissues. The
binding of ciprofloxacin to serum proteins is 20% to 40%, which is not likely
to be high enough to cause significant protein binding interactions with other
drugs. Following administration of a single dose of CIPRO XR, ciprofloxacin
concentrations in urine collected up to 4 hours after dosing averaged over 300
mg/L for both the 500 mg and 1000 mg tablets; in urine excreted from 12 to 24
hours after dosing, ciprofloxacin concentration averaged 27 mg/L for the 500
mg tablet, and 58 mg/L for the 1000 mg tablet.
Metabolism
Four metabolites of ciprofloxacin were identified in human urine. The metabolites
have antimicrobial activity, but are less active than unchanged ciprofloxacin.
The primary metabolites are oxociprofloxacin (M3) and sulfociprofloxacin (M2),
each accounting for roughly 3% to 8% of the total dose. Other minor metabolites
are desethylene ciprofloxacin (M1), and formylciprofloxacin (M4). The relative
proportion of drug and metabolite in serum corresponds to the composition found
in urine. Excretion of these metabolites was essentially complete by 24 hours
after dosing. Ciprofloxacin is an inhibitor of human cytochrome P450 1A2 (CYP1A2)
mediated metabolism. Coadministration of ciprofloxacin with other drugs primarily
metabolized by CYP1A2 results in increased plasma concentrations of these drugs
and could lead to clinically significant adverse events of the coadministered
drug (see CONTRAINDICATIONS; WARNINGS;
PRECAUTIONS: DRUG INTERACTIONS).
Elimination
The elimination kinetics of ciprofloxacin are similar for the immediate-release
and the CIPRO XR tablet. In studies comparing the CIPRO XR and immediate-release
ciprofloxacin, approximately 35% of an orally administered dose was excreted
in the urine as unchanged drug for both formulations. The urinary excretion
of ciprofloxacin is virtually complete within 24 hours after dosing. The renal
clearance of ciprofloxacin, which is approximately 300 mL/minute, exceeds the
normal glomerular filtration rate of 120 mL/minute. Thus, active tubular secretion
would seem to play a significant role in its elimination. Co-administration
of probenecid with immediate-release ciprofloxacin results in about a 50% reduction
in the ciprofloxacin renal clearance and a 50% increase in its concentration
in the systemic circulation. Although bile concentrations of ciprofloxacin are
several fold higher than serum concentrations after oral dosing with the immediate-release
tablet, only a small amount of the dose administered is recovered from the bile
as unchanged drug. An additional 1% to 2% of the dose is recovered from the
bile in the form of metabolites. Approximately 20% to 35% of an oral dose of
immediate-release ciprofloxacin is recovered from the feces within 5 days after
dosing. This may arise from either biliary clearance or transintestinal elimination.
Special Populations
Pharmacokinetic studies of the immediate-release oral tablet (single dose)
and intravenous (single and multiple dose) forms of ciprofloxacin indicate that
plasma concentrations of ciprofloxacin are higher in elderly subjects ( >
65 years) as compared to young adults. Cmax is increased 16% to 40%, and mean
AUC is increased approximately 30%, which can be at least partially attributed
to decreased renal clearance in the elderly. Elimination half-life is only slightly
(~20%) prolonged in the elderly. These differences are not considered clinically
significant. (See PRECAUTIONS, Geriatric Use.)
In patients with reduced renal function, the half-life of ciprofloxacin is
slightly prolonged. No dose adjustment is required for patients with uncomplicated
urinary tract infections receiving 500 mg CIPRO XR. For complicated urinary
tract infection and acute uncomplicated pyelonephritis, where 1000 mg is the
appropriate dose, the dosage of CIPRO XR should be reduced to CIPRO XR 500 mg
q24h in patients with creatinine clearance below 30 mL/min. (See DOSAGE
AND ADMINISTRATION.)
In studies in patients with stable chronic cirrhosis, no significant changes
in ciprofloxacin pharmacokinetics have been observed. The kinetics of ciprofloxacin
in patients with acute hepatic insufficiency, however, have not been fully elucidated.
(See DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION.)
Drug-drug Interactions
Concomitant administration with tizanidine is contraindicated. (See
CONTRAINDICATIONS). Previous studies with immediate-release
ciprofloxacin have shown that concomitant administration of ciprofloxacin with
theophylline decreases the clearance of theophylline resulting in elevated serum
theophylline levels and increased risk of a patient developing CNS or other
adverse reactions. Ciprofloxacin also decreases caffeine clearance and inhibits
the formation of paraxanthine after caffeine administration. Absorption of ciprofloxacin
is significantly reduced by concomitant administration of multivalent cation-containing
products such as magnesium/aluminum antacids, sucralfate, VIDEX® (didanosine)
chewable/buffered tablets or pediatric powder, or products containing calcium,
iron, or zinc. (See WARNINGS: PRECAUTIONS, DRUG
INTERACTIONS and INFORMATION FOR PATIENTS,
and DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION.)
Antacids: When CIPRO XR given as a single 1000 mg dose was administered
two hours before, or four hours after a magnesium/aluminum-containing antacid
(900 mg aluminum hydroxide and 600 mg magnesium hydroxide as a single oral dose)
to 18 healthy volunteers, there was a 4% and 19% reduction, respectively, in
the mean Cmax of ciprofloxacin. The reduction in the mean AUC was 24% and 26%,
respectively. CIPRO XR should be administered at least 2 hours before or 6 hours
after antacids containing magnesium or aluminum, as well as sucralfate, VIDEX®
(didanosine) chewable/buffered tablets or pediatric powder, other highly buffered
drugs, metal cations such as iron, and multivitamin preparations with zinc.
Although CIPRO XR may be taken with meals that include milk, concomitant administration
with dairy products or with calcium-fortified juices alone should be avoided,
since decreased absorption is possible. (See PRECAUTIONS,
INFORMATION FOR PATIENTS and DRUG
INTERACTIONS, and DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION.)
Omeprazole: When CIPRO XR was administered as a single 1000 mg dose
concomitantly with omeprazole (40 mg once daily for three days) to 18 healthy
volunteers, the mean AUC and Cmax of ciprofloxacin were reduced by 20% and 23%,
respectively. The clinical significance of this interaction has not been determined.
(See PRECAUTIONS: DRUG INTERACTIONS.)
Microbiology
Ciprofloxacin has in vitro activity against a wide range of gram-negative
and gram-positive organisms. The bactericidal action of ciprofloxacin results
from inhibition of topoisomerase II (DNA gyrase) and topoisomerase IV (both
Type II topoisomerases), which are required for bacterial DNA replication, transcription,
repair, and recombination. The mechanism of action of quinolones, including
ciprofloxacin, is different from that of other antimicrobial agents such as
beta-lactams, macrolides, tetracyclines, or aminoglycosides; therefore, organisms
resistant to these drugs may be susceptible to ciprofloxacin. There is no known
cross-resistance between ciprofloxacin and other classes of antimicrobials.
Resistance to ciprofloxacin in vitro develops slowly (multiple-step mutation).
Resistance to ciprofloxacin due to spontaneous mutations occurs at a general
frequency of between < 10-9 to 1x10-6.
Ciprofloxacin is slightly less active when tested at acidic pH. The inoculum
size has little effect when tested in vitro. The minimal bactericidal
concentration (MBC) generally does not exceed the minimal inhibitory concentration
(MIC) by more than a factor of 2.
Ciprofloxacin has been shown to be active against most strains of the following
microorganisms, both in vitro and in clinical infections as described
in the INDICATIONS AND USAGE section.
Aerobic gram-positive microorganisms
Enterococcus faecalis (Many strains are only moderately susceptible.)
Staphylococcus saprophyticus
Aerobic gram-negative microorganisms
Escherichia coli
Klebsiella pneumoniae
Proteus mirabilis
Pseudomonas aeruginosa
The following in vitro data are available, but their clinical significance
is unknown.
Ciprofloxacin exhibits in vitro minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs)
of 1 μg/mL or less against most ( ≥ 90%) strains of the following microorganisms;
however, the safety and effectiveness of CIPRO XR in treating clinical infections
due to these microorganisms have not been established in adequate and well-controlled
clinical trials.
Aerobic gram-negative microorganisms
| Citrobacter koseri |
Morganella morganii |
| Citrobacter freundii |
Proteus vulgaris |
| Edwardsiella tarda |
Providencia rettgeri |
| Enterobacter aerogenes |
Providencia stuartii |
| Enterobacter cloacae |
Serratia marcescens |
| Klebsiella oxytoca |
|
Susceptibility Tests
Dilution Techniques: Quantitative methods are used to determine antimicrobial
minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs). These MICs provide estimates of the
susceptibility of bacteria to antimicrobial compounds. The MICs should be determined
using a standardized procedure. Standardized procedures are based on a dilution
method1 (broth or agar) or equivalent with standardized inoculum
concentrations and standardized concentrations of ciprofloxacin. The MIC values
should be interpreted according to the following criteria:
For testing Enterobacteriaceae, Enterococcus faecalis, Pseudomonas
aeruginosa, and Staphylococcus saprophyticus:
| MIC (μg/mL) |
Interpretation |
| ≤ 1 |
Susceptible(S) |
| 2 |
Intermediate(I) |
| ≥ 4 |
Resistant(R) |
A report of “Susceptible” indicates that the pathogen is likely to
be inhibited if the antimicrobial compound in the blood reaches the concentrations
usually achievable. A report of “Intermediate” indicates that the
result should be considered equivocal, and, if the microorganism is not fully
susceptible to alternative, clinically feasible drugs, the test should be repeated.
This category implies possible clinical applicability in body sites where the
drug is physiologically concentrated or in situations where high dosage of drug
can be used. This category also provides a buffer zone which prevents small
uncontrolled technical factors from causing major discrepancies in interpretation.
A report of “Resistant” indicates that the pathogen is not likely
to be inhibited if the antimicrobial compound in the blood reaches the concentrations
usually achievable; other therapy should be selected.
Standardized susceptibility test procedures require the use of laboratory control
microorganisms to control the technical aspects of the laboratory procedures.
Standard ciprofloxacin powder should provide the following MIC values:
| Microorganism |
|
MIC Range (μg/mL) |
| Enterococcus faecalis |
ATCC 29212 |
0.25 - 2.0 |
| Escherichia coli |
ATCC 25922 |
0.004 - 0.015 |
| Staphylococcus aureus |
ATCC 29213 |
0.12 - 0.5 |
| Pseudomonas aeruginosa |
ATCC 27853 |
0.25 - 1 |
Diffusion Techniques: Quantitative methods that require measurement
of zone diameters also provide reproducible estimates of the susceptibility
of bacteria to antimicrobial compounds. One such standardized procedure2
requires the use of standardized inoculum concentrations. This procedure uses
paper disks impregnated with 5-μg ciprofloxacin to test the susceptibility
of microorganisms to ciprofloxacin. Reports from the laboratory providing results
of the standard single-disk susceptibility test with a 5-μg ciprofloxacin
disk should be interpreted according to the following criteria:
For testing Enterobacteriaceae, Enterococcus faecalis, Pseudomonas
aeruginosa, and Staphylococcus saprophyticus:
| Zone Diameter (mm) |
Interpretation |
| ≥ 21 |
Susceptible(S) |
| 16 - 20 |
Intermediate(I) |
| ≤ 15 |
Resistant(R) |
Interpretation should be as stated above for results using dilution techniques.
Interpretation involves correlation of the diameter obtained in the disk test
with the MIC for ciprofloxacin.
As with standardized dilution techniques, diffusion methods require the use
of laboratory control microorganisms that are used to control the technical
aspects of the laboratory procedures. For the diffusion technique, the 5-μg
ciprofloxacin disk should provide the following zone diameters in these laboratory
test quality control strains:
| Microorganism |
|
Zone Diameter (mm) |
| Escherichia coli |
ATCC 25922 |
30 - 40 |
| Staphylococcus aureus |
ATCC 25923 |
22 - 30 |
| Pseudomonas aeruginosa |
ATCC 27853 |
25 - 33 |
ANIMAL PHARMACOLOGY
Ciprofloxacin and other quinolones have been shown to cause arthropathy in
immature animals of most species tested. (See WARNINGS.)
Damage of weight bearing joints was observed in juvenile dogs and rats. In young
beagles, 100 mg/kg ciprofloxacin, given daily for 4 weeks, caused degenerative
articular changes of the knee joint. At 30 mg/kg, the effect on the joint was
minimal. In a subsequent study in beagles, removal of weight bearing from the
joint reduced the lesions but did not totally prevent them.
Crystalluria, sometimes associated with secondary nephropathy, occurs in laboratory
animals dosed with ciprofloxacin. This is primarily related to the reduced solubility
of ciprofloxacin under alkaline conditions, which predominate in the urine of
test animals; in man, crystalluria is rare since human urine is typically acidic.
In rhesus monkeys, crystalluria without nephropathy has been noted after single
oral doses as low as 5 mg/kg. After 6 months of intravenous dosing at 10 mg/kg/day,
no nephropathological changes were noted; however, nephropathy was observed
after dosing at 20 mg/kg/day for the same duration.
In mice, concomitant administration of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs
such as phenylbutazone and indomethacin with quinolones has been reported to
enhance the CNS stimulatory effect of quinolones.
Ocular toxicity seen with some related drugs has not been observed in ciprofloxacin-treated
animals.
Clinical Studies
Uncomplicated Urinary Tract Infections (acute cystitis)
CIPRO XR was evaluated for the treatment of uncomplicated urinary tract infections
(acute cystitis) in a randomized, double-blind, controlled clinical trial conducted
in the US. This study compared CIPRO XR (500 mg once daily for three days) with
ciprofloxacin immediate-release tablets (CIPRO® 250 mg BID for three days).
Of the 905 patients enrolled, 452 were randomly assigned to the CIPRO XR treatment
group and 453 were randomly assigned to the control group. The primary efficacy
variable was bacteriologic eradication of the baseline organism(s) with no new
infection or superinfection at test-of-cure (Day 4 -11 Post-therapy).
The bacteriologic eradication and clinical success rates were similar between
CIPRO XR and the control group. The eradication and clinical success rates and
their corresponding 95% confidence intervals for the differences between rates
(CIPRO XR minus control group) are given in the following table:
| |
CIPRO XR 500 mg QD x 3 Days |
CIPRO 250 mg BID x 3 Days |
| Randomized Patients |
452 |
453 |
| Per Protocol Patients† |
199 |
223 |
| Bacteriologic Eradication at TOC (n/N)* |
188/199 (94.5%) |
209/223 (93.7%) |
| |
CI [-3.5%,5.1%] |
| Bacteriologic Eradication (by organism) at TOC (n/N)** |
| E. coli |
156/160 (97.5%) |
176/181 (97.2%) |
| E. faecalis |
10/11 (90.9%) |
17/21 (81.0%) |
| P. mirabilis |
11/12 (91.7%) |
7/7 (100%) |
| S. saprophyticus |
6/7 (85.7%) |
9/9 (100%) |
| Clinical Response at TOC (n/N)*** |
189/199 (95.0%) |
204/223 (91.5%) |
| |
CI [-1.1%,8.1%] |
* n/N = patients with baseline organism(s)
eradicated and no new infections or superinfections/ total number of patients
** n/N = patients with specified baseline organism eradicated/patients
with specified baseline organism
*** n/N = patients with clinical success /total number of patients †
The presence of a pathogen at a level of ≥ 105 CFU/mL
was required for microbiological evaluability criteria, except for S.
saprophyticus ( ≥ 104 CFU/mL). |
Complicated Urinary Tract Infections and Acute Uncomplicated Pyelonephritis
CIPRO XR was evaluated for the treatment of complicated urinary tract infections
(cUTI) and acute uncomplicated pyelonephritis (AUP) in a randomized, double-blind,
controlled clinical trial conducted in the US and Canada. The study enrolled
1,042 patients (521 patients per treatment arm) and compared CIPRO XR (1000
mg once daily for 7 to 14 days) with immediate-release ciprofloxacin (500 mg
BID for 7 to 14 days). The primary efficacy endpoint for this trial was bacteriologic
eradication of the baseline organism(s) with no new infection or superinfection
at 5 to 11 days post-therapy (test-of-cure or TOC) for the Per Protocol and
Modified Intent-To-Treat (MITT) populations.
The Per Protocol population was defined as patients with a diagnosis of cUTI
or AUP, a causative organism(s) at baseline present at ≥ 105 CFU/mL,
no inclusion criteria violation, a valid test-of-cure urine culture within the
TOC window, an organism susceptible to study drug, no premature discontinuation
or loss to follow-up, and compliance with the dosage regimen (among other criteria).
More patients in the CIPRO XR arm than in the control arm were excluded from
the Per Protocol population and this should be considered in the interpretation
of the study results. Reasons for exclusion with the greatest discrepancy between
the two arms were no valid test-of-cure urine culture, an organism resistant
to the study drug, and premature discontinuation due to adverse events.
An analysis of all patients with a causative organism(s) isolated at baseline
and who received study medication, defined as the MITT population, included
342 patients in the CIPRO XR arm and 324 patients in the control arm. Patients
with missing responses were counted as failures in this analysis. In the MITT
analysis of cUTI patients, bacteriologic eradication was 160/271 (59.0%) versus
156/248 (62.9%) in CIPRO XR and control arm, respectively [97.5% CI* (-13.5%,
5.7%)]. Clinical cure was 184/271 (67.9%) for CIPRO XR and 182/248 (73.4%) for
control arm, respectively [97.5% CI* (-14.4%, 3.5%)]. Bacterial eradication
in the MITT analysis of patients with AUP at TOC was 47/71 (66.2%) and 58/76
(76.3%) for CIPRO XR and control arm, respectively [97.5% CI* (-26.8%, 6.5%)].
Clinical cure at TOC was 50/71 (70.4%) for CIPRO XR and 58/76 (76.3%) for the
control arm [97.5% CI* (-22.0%, 10.4%)].
* confidence interval of the difference in rates (CIPRO XR minus control).
In the Per Protocol population, the differences between CIPRO XR and the control
arm in bacteriologic eradication rates at the TOC visit were not consistent
between AUP and cUTI patients. The bacteriologic eradication rate for cUTI patients
was higher in the CIPRO XR arm than in the control arm. For AUP patients, the
bacteriologic eradication rate was lower in the CIPRO XR arm than in the control
arm. This inconsistency was not observed between the two treatment groups for
clinical cure rates. Clinical cure rates were 96.1% (198/206) and 92.1% (211/229)
for CIPRO XR and the control arm, respectively.
The bacterial eradication and clinical cure rates by infection type for CIPRO
XR and the control arm at the TOC visit and their corresponding 97.5% confidence
intervals for the differences between rates (CIPRO XR minus control arm) are
given below for the Per Protocol population analysis:
| |
CIPRO XR 1000 mg QD |
CIPRO 500 mg BID |
| Randomized Patients |
521 |
521 |
| Per Protocol Patients^ |
206 |
229 |
|
cUTI Patients
|
| Bacteriologic Eradication at TOC (n/N)* |
148/166 (89.2%) |
144/177 (81.4%) |
| |
CI [-0.7%,16.3%] |
| Bacteriologic Eradication (by organism) at TOC (n/N)** |
| E. coli |
91/94 (96.8%) |
90/92 (97.8%) |
| K. pneumoniae |
20/21 (95.2%) |
19/23 (82.6%) |
| E. faecalis |
17/17 (100%) |
14/21 (66.7%) |
| P. mirabilis |
11/12 (91.6%) |
10/10 (100%) |
| P. aeruginosa |
3/3 (100%) |
3/3 (100%) |
| Clinical Cure at TOC (n/N)*** |
159/166 (95.8%) |
161/177 (91.0%) |
| |
CI [-1.1%,10.8%] |
| AUP Patients |
| Bacteriologic Eradication at TOC (n/N)* |
35/40 (87.5%) |
51/52 (98.1%) |
| |
CI [-34.8%,6.2%] |
| Bacteriologic Eradication of E. coli at TOC (n/N)** |
35/36 (97.2%) |
41/41 (100%) |
| Clinical Cure at TOC (n/N)*** |
39/40 (97.5%) |
50/52 (96.2%) |
| |
CI [-15.3%,21.1%] |
^ Patients excluded from the Per Protocol
population were primarily those with no causative organism(s) at baseline
or no organism present at ≥ 105 CFU/mL at baseline, inclusion
criteria violation, no valid test-of-cure urine culture within the TOC
window, an organism resistant to study drug, premature discontinuation
due to an adverse event, lost to follow-up, or non-compliance with dosage
regimen (among other criteria).
* n/N = patients with baseline organism(s) eradicated and no new infections
or superinfections/total number of patients
** n/N = patients with specified baseline organism eradicated/patients
with specified baseline organism
***n/N = patients with clinical success /total number of patients |
Of the 166 cUTI patients treated with CIPRO XR, 148 (89%) had the causative
organism(s) eradicated, 8 (5%) had persistence, 5 (3%) patients developed superinfections
and 5 (3%) developed new infections. Of the 177 cUTI patients treated in the
control arm, 144 (81%) had the causative organism(s) eradicated, 16 (9%) patients
had persistence, 3 (2%) developed superinfections and 14 (8%) developed new
infections. Of the 40 patients with AUP treated with CIPRO XR, 35 (87.5%) had
the causative organism(s) eradicated, 2 (5%) patients had persistence and 3
(7.5%) developed new infections. Of the 5 CIPRO XR AUP patients without eradication
at TOC, 4 were considered clinical cures and did not receive alternative antibiotic
therapy. Of the 52 patients with AUP treated in the control arm, 51 (98%) had
the causative organism(s) eradicated. One patient (2%) had persistence.
REFERENCES
1. NCCLS, Methods for Dilution Antimicrobial Susceptibility
Tests for Bacteria That Grow Aerobically-Sixth Edition. Approved Standard NCCLS
Document M7-A6, Vol. 23, No. 2, NCCLS, Wayne, PA, January, 2003.
2. NCCLS, Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Disk Susceptibility
Tests-Eighth Edition. Approved Standard NCCLS Document M2-A8, Vol. 23, No. 1,
NCCLS, Wayne, PA, January, 2003.
Last updated on RxList: 12/3/2008