COUMADIN and other coumarin anticoagulants act by inhibiting the synthesis
of vitamin K dependent clotting factors, which include Factors II, VII, IX and
X, and the anticoagulant proteins C and S. Half-lives of these clotting factors
are as follows: Factor II - 60 hours, VII - 4 to 6 hours, IX - 24 hours, and
X - 48 to 72 hours. The half-lives of proteins C and S are approximately 8 hours
and 30 hours, respectively. The resultant in vivo effect is a sequential
depression of Factor VII, Protein C, Factor IX, Protein S, and Factor X and
II activities. Vitamin K is an essential cofactor for the post ribosomal synthesis
of the vitamin K dependent clotting factors. The vitamin promotes the biosynthesis
of -γ-carboxyglutamic acid residues in the proteins which are essential for
biological activity.
Mechanism of Action
Warfarin is thought to interfere with clotting factor synthesis by inhibition
of the C1 subunit of the vitamin K epoxide reductase (VKORC1) enzyme complex,
thereby reducing the regeneration of vitamin K1 epoxide. The degree
of depression is dependent upon the dosage administered and, in part, by the
patient's VKORC1 genotype. Therapeutic doses of warfarin decrease the total
amount of the active form of each vitamin K dependent clotting factor made by
the liver by approximately 30% to 50%.
An anticoagulation effect generally occurs within 24 hours after drug administration. However, peak anticoagulant effect may be delayed 72 to 96 hours. The duration of action of a single dose of racemic warfarin is 2 to 5 days. The effects of COUMADIN may become more pronounced as effects of daily maintenance doses overlap. Anticoagulants have no direct effect on an established thrombus, nor do they reverse ischemic tissue damage. However, once a thrombus has occurred, the goal of anticoagulant treatment is to prevent further extension of the formed clot and prevent secondary thromboembolic complications which may result in serious and possibly fatal sequelae.
Pharmacokinetics
COUMADIN is a racemic mixture of the R- and S-enantiomers. The
S-enantiomer exhibits 2 to 5 times more anticoagulant activity than the
R-enantiomer in humans, but generally has a more rapid clearance
Absorption: COUMADIN is essentially completely absorbed after
oral administration with peak concentration generally attained within the first
4 hours.
Distribution: There are no differences in the apparent volumes
of distribution after intravenous and oral administration of single doses of
warfarin solution. Warfarin distributes into a relatively small apparent volume
of distribution of about 0.14 liter/kg. A distribution phase lasting 6 to 12
hours is distinguishable after rapid intravenous or oral administration of an
aqueous solution. Using a one compartment model, and assuming complete bioavailability,
estimates of the volumes of distribution of R- and S-warfarin are similar to
each other and to that of the racemate. Concentrations in fetal plasma approach
the maternal values, but warfarin has not been found in human milk (see WARNINGS:
Lactation). Approximately 99% of the drug is bound to plasma proteins.
Metabolism: The elimination of warfarin is almost entirely by
metabolism. COUMADIN is stereoselectively metabolized by hepatic microsomal
enzymes (cytochrome P-450) to inactive hydroxylated metabolites (predominant
route) and by reductases to reduced metabolites (warfarin alcohols). The warfarin
alcohols have minimal anticoagulant activity. The metabolites are principally
excreted into the urine; and to a lesser extent into the bile. The metabolites
of warfarin that have been identified include dehydrowarfarin, two diastereoisomer
alcohols, 4'-, 6-, 7-, 8- and 10-hydroxywarfarin. The cytochrome P-450 isozymes
involved in the metabolism of warfarin include 2C9, 2C19, 2C8, 2C18, 1A2, and
3A4. 2C9 is likely to be the principal form of human liver P-450 which modulates
the in vivo anticoagulant activity of warfarin.
The S-enantiomer of warfarin is mainly metabolized to 7-hydroxywarfarin
by CYP2C9, a polymorphic enzyme. The variant alleles CYP2C9*2 and CYP2C9*3 result
in decreased in vitro CYP2C9 enzymatic 7-hydroxylation of S-warfarin.
The frequencies of these alleles in Caucasians are approximately 11% and 7%
for CYP2C9*2 and CYP2C9*3, respectively.1 Patients with one or more
of these variant CYP2C9 alleles have decreased S-warfarin clearance (Table 1).2
Table 1: Relationship Between S-Warfarin Clearance and CYP2C9
Genotype in Caucasian Patients
| CYP2C9 Genotype |
N |
S-Warfarin Clearance/Lean Body Weight
(mL/min/kg)
Mean (SD)a |
| *1/*1 |
118 |
0.065 (0.025)b |
| *1/*2 or *1/*3 |
59 |
0.041 (0.021)b |
| *2/*2, *2/*3, or *3/*3 |
11 |
0.020 (0.011)b |
| Total |
188 |
|
a SD=Standard deviation.
b p < 0.001. Pairwise comparisons indicated significant differences
among all 3 genotypes.
|
Other CYP2C9 alleles associated with reduced enzymatic activity occur at lower frequencies, including *5, *6, and *11 alleles in populations of African ancestry and *5, *9, and *11 alleles in Caucasians.
Excretion: The terminal half-life of warfarin after a single
dose is approximately 1 week; however, the effective half-life ranges from 20
to 60 hours, with a mean of about 40 hours. The clearance of R-warfarin is generally
half that of S-warfarin, thus as the volumes of distribution are similar, the
half-life of R-warfarin is longer than that of S-warfarin. The half-life of
R-warfarin ranges from 37 to 89 hours, while that of S-warfarin ranges from
21 to 43 hours. Studies with radiolabeled drug have demonstrated that up to
92% of the orally administered dose is recovered in urine. Very little warfarin
is excreted unchanged in urine. Urinary excretion is in the form of metabolites.
Pharmacogenomics
A meta-analysis of 9 qualified studies including 2775 patients (99% Caucasian)
was performed to examine the clinical outcomes associated with CYP2C9 gene variants
in warfarin-treated patients.3 In this meta-analysis, 3 studies assessed
bleeding risks and 8 studies assessed daily dose requirements. The analysis
suggested an increased bleeding risk for patients carrying either the CYP2C9*2
or CYP2C9*3 alleles. Patients carrying at least one copy of the CYP2C9*2 allele
required a mean daily warfarin dose that was 17% less than the mean daily dose
for patients homozygous for the CYP2C9*1 allele. For patients carrying at least
one copy of the CYP2C9*3 allele, the mean daily warfarin dose was 37% less than
the mean daily dose for patients homozygous for the CYP2C9*1 allele.
In an observational study, the risk of achieving INR > 3 during the first
3 weeks of warfarin therapy was determined in 219 Swedish patients retrospectively
grouped by CYP2C9 genotype. The relative risk of overanticoagulation as measured
by INR > 3 during the first 2 weeks of therapy was approximately doubled for
those patients classified as *2 or *3 compared to patients who were homozygous
for the *1 allele.4
Warfarin reduces the regeneration of vitamin K from vitamin K epoxide in the
vitamin K cycle, through inhibition of vitamin K epoxide reductase (VKOR), a
multiprotein enzyme complex. Certain single nucleotide polymorphisms in the
VKORC1 gene (especially the –1639G > A allele) have been associated with lower
dose requirements for warfarin. In 201 Caucasian patients treated with stable
warfarin doses, genetic variations in the VKORC1 gene were associated with lower
warfarin doses. In this study, about 30% of the variance in warfarin dose could
be attributed to variations in the VKORC1 gene alone; about 40% of the variance
in warfarin dose could be attributed to variations in VKORC1 and CYP2C9 genes
combined.5 About 55% of the variability in warfarin dose could be
explained by the combination of VKORC1 and CYP2C9 genotypes, age, height, body
weight, interacting drugs, and indication for warfarin therapy in Caucasian
patients.5 Similar observations have been reported in Asian patients.6,7
Elderly: Patients 60 years or older appear to exhibit greater
than expected PT/INR response to the anticoagulant effects of warfarin. The
cause of the increased sensitivity to the anticoagulant effects of warfarin
in this age group is unknown. This increased anticoagulant effect from warfarin
may be due to a combination of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic factors.
Racemic warfarin clearance may be unchanged or reduced with increasing age.
Limited information suggests there is no difference in the clearance of S-warfarin
in the elderly versus young subjects. However, there may be a slight decrease
in the clearance of R-warfarin in the elderly as compared to the young. Therefore,
as patient age increases, a lower dose of warfarin is usually required to produce
a therapeutic level of anticoagulation.
Asians: Asian patients may require lower initiation and maintenance
doses of warfarin. One non-controlled study conducted in 151 Chinese outpatients
reported a mean daily warfarin requirement of 3.3±1.4 mg to achieve an
INR of 2 to 2.5. These patients were stabilized on warfarin for various indications.
Patient age was the most important determinant of warfarin requirement in Chinese
patients with a progressively lower warfarin requirement with increasing age.
Renal Dysfunction: Renal clearance is considered to be a minor
determinant of anticoagulant response to warfarin. No dosage adjustment is necessary
for patients with renal failure.
Hepatic Dysfunction: Hepatic dysfunction can potentiate the response
to warfarin through impaired synthesis of clotting factors and decreased metabolism
of warfarin.
The administration of COUMADIN (Warfarin Sodium) via the intravenous (IV) route should provide the patient with the same concentration of an equal oral dose, but maximum plasma concentration will be reached earlier. However, the full anticoagulant effect of a dose of warfarin may not be achieved until 72 to 96 hours after dosing, indicating that the administration of IV COUMADIN should not provide any increased biological effect or earlier onset of action.
Clinical Trials
Atrial Fibrillation (AF): In five prospective randomized controlled
clinical trials involving 3711 patients with non-rheumatic A F, warfarin significantly
reduced the risk of systemic thromboembolism including stroke (see Table
2). The risk reduction ranged from 60% to 86% in all except one trial (CAFA:
45%) which stopped early due to published positive results from two of these
trials. The incidence of major bleeding in these trials ranged from 0.6% to
2.7% (see Table 2). Meta-analysis findings of these studies revealed
that the effects of warfarin in reducing thromboembolic events including stroke
were similar at either moderately high INR (2.0-4.5) or low INR (1.4-3.0). There
was a significant reduction in minor bleeds at the low INR. Similar data from
clinical studies in valvular atrial fibrillation patients are not available.
Table 2: Clinical Studies of Warfarin in Non-Rheumatic AF
Patients*
| |
N |
|
Thromboembolism |
% Major Bleeding |
| Study |
Warfarin-Treated Patients |
Control Patients |
PT Ratio |
INR |
% Risk Reduction |
p-value |
Warfarin-Treated Patients |
Control Patients |
| AFASAK |
335 |
336 |
1.5-2.0 |
2.8-4.2 |
60 |
0.027 |
0.6 |
0.0 |
| SPAF |
210 |
211 |
1.3-1.8 |
2.0-4.5 |
67 |
0.01 |
1.9 |
1.9 |
| BAATAF |
212 |
208 |
1.2-1.5 |
1.5-2.7 |
86 |
< 0.05 |
0.9 |
0.5 |
| CAFA |
187 |
191 |
1.3-1.6 |
2.0-3.0 |
45 |
0.25 |
2.7 |
0.5 |
| SPINAF |
260 |
265 |
1.2-1.5 |
1.4-2.8 |
79 |
0.001 |
2.3 |
1.5 |
| *All study results of warfarin vs. control are based on intention-to-treat
analysis and include ischemic stroke and systemic thromboembolism, excluding
hemorrhage and transient ischemic attacks. |
Myocardial Infarction: WARIS (The Warfarin Re-Infarction Study) was
a double-blind, randomized study of 1214 patients 2 to 4 weeks post-infarction
treated with warfarin to a target INR of 2.8 to 4.8. [But note that a lower
INR was achieved and increased bleeding was associated with INRs above 4.0;
(see DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION).] The primary endpoint was a combination
of total mortality and recurrent infarction. A secondary endpoint of cerebrovascular
events was assessed. Mean follow-up of the patients was 37 months. The results
for each endpoint separately, including an analysis of vascular death, are provided
in the following table:
Table 3
| Event |
Warfarin
(N=607) |
Placebo
(N=607) |
RR
(95% CI) |
% Risk Reduction (p-value) |
| Total Patient Years of Follow-up |
2018 |
1944 |
|
|
| Total Mortality |
94 (4.7/100 py) |
123 (6.3/100 py) |
0.76 (0.60, 0.97) |
24 (p=0.030) |
| Vascular Death |
82 (4.1/100 py) |
105 (5.4/100 py) |
0.78 (0.60, 1.02) |
22 (p=0.068) |
| Recurrent MI |
82 (4.1/100 py) |
124 (6.4/100 py) |
0.66 (0.51, 0.85) |
34 (p=0.001) |
| Cerebrovascular Event |
20 (1.0/100 py) |
44 (2.3/100 py) |
0.46 (0.28, 0.75) |
54 (p=0.002) |
| RR=Relative risk; Risk reduction=(1 - RR); CI=Confidence interval;
MI=Myocardial infarction; py=patient years |
WARIS II (The Warfarin, Aspirin, Re-Infarction Study) was an open-label, randomized
study of 3630 patients hospitalized for acute myocardial infarction treated
with warfarin target INR 2.8 to 4.2, aspirin 160 mg/day, or warfarin target
INR 2.0 to 2.5 plus aspirin 75 mg/day prior to hospital discharge. There were
approximately four times as many major bleeding episodes in the two groups receiving
warfarin than in the group receiving aspirin alone. Major bleeding episodes
were not more frequent among patients receiving aspirin plus warfarin than among
those receiving warfarin alone, but the incidence of minor bleeding episodes
was higher in the combined therapy group. The primary endpoint was a composite
of death, nonfatal reinfarction, or thromboembolic stroke. The mean duration
of observation was approximately 4 years. The results for WARIS II are provided
in the following table.8
Table 4: WARIS II - Distribution of Separate Events According
to Treatment Group
| Event |
Aspirin
(N=1206) |
Warfarin
(N=1216) |
Aspirin plus Warfarin
(N=1208) |
Rate Ratio
(95% CI)* |
p-value |
| |
No. of Events |
|
|
| Reinfarction |
117 |
90 |
69 |
0.56 (0.41-0.78)a |
< 0.001 |
| |
|
|
0.74 (0.55-0.98)b |
0.03 |
| Thromboembolic Stroke |
32 |
17 |
17 |
0.52 (0.28-0.98)a |
0.03 |
| |
|
|
0.52 (0.28-0.97)b |
0.03 |
| Major Bleedingc |
8 |
33 |
28 |
3.35a (ND) |
ND |
| |
|
|
4.00b (ND) |
ND |
| Minor Bleedingd |
39 |
103 |
133 |
3.21a (ND) |
ND |
| |
|
|
2.55b (ND) |
ND |
| Death |
92 |
96 |
95 |
|
0.82 |
* CI denotes confidence interval.
a The rate ratio is for aspirin plus warfarin as compared with
aspirin.
b The rate ratio is for warfarin as compared with aspirin.
c Major bleeding episodes were defined as nonfatal cerebral hemorrhage
or bleeding necessitating surgical intervention or blood transfusion.
d Minor bleeding episodes were defined as non-cerebral hemorrhage
not necessitating surgical intervention or blood transfusion. ND=not determined
|
Mechanical and Bioprosthetic Heart Valves: In a prospective, randomized,
open-label, positive-controlled study9 in 254 patients, the thromboembolic-free
interval was found to be significantly greater in patients with mechanical prosthetic
heart valves treated with warfarin alone compared with dipyridamole-aspirin
(p < 0.005) and pentoxifylline-aspirin (p < 0.05) treated patients.
Rates of thromboembolic events in these groups were 2.2, 8.6, and 7.9/100 patient
years, respectively. Major bleeding rates were 2.5, 0.0, and 0.9/100 patient
years, respectively.
In a prospective, open label, clinical trial comparing moderate (INR 2.65)
vs. high intensity (INR 9.0) warfarin therapies in 258 patients with mechanical
prosthetic heart valves, thromboembolism occurred with similar frequency in
the two groups (4.0 and 3.7 events/100 patient years, respectively). Major bleeding
was more common in the high intensity group (2.1 events/100 patient years) vs.
0.95 events/100 patient years in the moderate intensity group.10
In a randomized trial in 210 patients comparing two intensities of warfarin
therapy (INR 2.0-2.25 vs. INR 2.5-4.0) for a three-month period following tissue
heart valve replacement, thromboembolism occurred with similar frequency in
the two groups (major embolic events 2.0% vs. 1.9%, respectively, and minor
embolic events 10.8% vs. 10.2%, respectively). Major bleeding complications
were more frequent with the higher intensity (major hemorrhages 4.6%) vs. none
in the lower intensity.11
REFERENCES
1. Yasar U, Eliasson E, Dahl M, Johansson I, Ingelman-Sundberg M, Sjoqvist
F. Validation of methods for CYP2C9 genotyping: Frequencies of mutant alleles
in Swedish population. Biochem Biophys Res Comm. 1999;254:628-631.
2. Herman D, Locatelli I, Grabnar I, et al. Influence of CYP2C9 polymorphisms,
demographic factors and concomitant drug therapy on warfarin metabolism and
maintenance dose. Pharmacogenomics J. 2005;5:193-202.
3. Sanderson S, Emery J, Higgins J. CYP2C9 gene variants, drug dose, and bleeding
risk in warfarin-treated patients: A HuGEnet™ systemic review and meta-analysis.
Genet Med. 2005;7:97-104.
4. Lindh JD, Lundgren S, Holm L, Alfredsson L, Rane A. Several-fold increase
in risk of overanticoagulation by CYP2C9 mutations. Clin Pharmacol Ther.
2005;78:540-550.
5. Wadelius M, Chen LY, Downes K, et al. Common VKORC1 and GGCX polymorphisms
associated with warfarin dose. Pharmacogenomics J. 2005;5:262-270.
6. Veenstra DL, You JHS, Rieder MJ, et al. Association of Vitamin K epoxide
reductase complex 1 (VKORC1) variants with warfarin dose in a Hong Kong Chinese
patient population. Pharmacogenet Genomics. 2005;15:687-691.
7. Takahashi H, Wilkinson GR, Nutescu EA, et al. Different contributions of
polymorphisms in VKORC1 and CYP2C9 to intra- and inter-population differences
in maintenance doses of warfarin in Japanese, Caucasians and African Americans.
Pharmacogenet Genomics. 2006;16:101-110.
8. Hurlen M, Abdelnoor M, Smith P, Erikssen J, Arnesen H. Warfarin, aspirin,
or both after myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:969-974.
9. Mok CK, Boey J, Wang R, et al. Warfarin versus dipyridamole-aspirin and
pentoxifylline-aspirin for prevention of prosthetic valve thromboembolism: a
prospective randomized clinical trial. Circ. 1985;72:1059-1063.
10. Saour JN, Sieck JO, Mamo LA, Gallus AS. Trial of different intensities
of anticoagulation in patients with prosthetic heart valves. N Engl J Med.
1990;322:428-432.
11. Turpie AG, Hirsh J, Gunstensen J, Nelson H, Gent M. Randomized comparison
to two intensities of oral anticoagulant therapy after tissue heart valve replacement.
Lancet. 1988;331:1242-1245.
Last updated on RxList: 7/1/2009