Mechanism of Action
CroFab is a venom-specific Fab fragment of immunoglobulin G (IgG) that works by binding and neutralizing venom toxins, facilitating their redistribution away from target tissues and their elimination from the body.
Animal Studies
CroFab was effective in neutralizing the venoms of 10 clinically important
North American crotalid snakes in a murine lethality model (see Table 2)
[1]. In addition, preliminary data from experiments in mice using whole IgG
from the sheep immunized for CroFab production suggest that CroFab might possess
antigenic cross-reactivity against the venoms of some Middle Eastern and North
African snakes, however, there are no clinical data available to confirm these
findings.
Table 2. ED50 Values for CroFab in Mice
| Study Objective & Design |
Endpoint Measured |
Major Findings and Conclusions |
To determine the cross-neutralizing ability
of CroFab to protect mice from the lethal effects of venom from clinically
important species.
Separate groups of mice were injected with increasing doses of CroFab
pre-mixed with two LD50 of each venom tested. |
ED50 for each venom |
(Note: Lower numbers represent increased potency against
venoms listed) |
| Challenge Venom |
ED50 (expressed as mg antivenin/mg venom) |
| C. atrox |
5 |
| C. adamanteus |
8 |
| C. scutulatus |
15 |
| A. piscivorus |
3 |
| C. h. atricaudatus |
7 |
| C. v. helleri |
122 |
| C. m. molossus |
25 |
| A. c. contortrix |
4 |
| S. m. barbouri |
7 |
| C. h. horridus |
6 |
| Based on the data from this study in mice, CroFab has relatively
good crossprotection against venoms not used in the immunization of flocks
used to produce it, except for C. v. helleri, where a very high
dose is required, and for C. m. molossus, where a moderately high
dose is required. |
Clinical Pharmacokinetics
The planned pharmacokinetic study of CroFab was not adequately performed. A
limited number of samples were collected from three patients. Based on these
data, estimates of elimination half-life were made. The elimination half-life
for total Fab ranged from approximately 12 to 23 hours. These limited pharmacokinetic
estimates of half-life are augmented by data obtained with an analogous ovine
Fab product produced by Protherics Inc. using a similar production process.
In that study, 8 healthy subjects were given 1 mg of intravenous digoxin followed
by an approximately equimolar neutralizing dose of 76 mg of digoxin immune Fab
(ovine). Total Fab was shown to have a volume of distribution of 0.3 L/kg, a
systemic clearance of 32 mL/min (approximately 0.4 mL/min/kg) and an elimination
half-life of approximately 15 hours.
Clinical Studies
No clinical studies have been conducted comparing CroFab with other antivenins,
therefore, no comparisons can be made between CroFab and other antivenins.
Two clinical trials using CroFab have been conducted. They were prospectively defined, open-label, multi-center trials conducted in otherwise healthy patients 11 years of age or older who had suffered from minimal or moderate (as defined in Table 3) North American crotalid envenomation that showed evidence of progression. Progression was defined as the worsening of any evaluation parameter used in the grading of an envenomation: local injury, laboratory abnormality or symptoms and signs attributable to crotalid snake venom poisoning. Both clinical trials excluded patients with Copperhead envenomation. To date, there are no clinical data supporting the efficacy of CroFab in patients presenting with severe envenomation.
Table 3. Definition of Minimal, Moderate, and Severe Envenomation
in Clinical Studies of CroFab
| Envenomation Category |
Definition |
| Minimal |
Swelling, pain, and ecchymosis limited to the immediate bite
site;
Systemic signs and symptoms absent;
Coagulation parameters normal with no clinical evidence of bleeding. |
| Moderate |
Swelling, pain, and ecchymosis involving less than a full extremity
or, if bite was sustained on the trunk, head or neck, extending less than
50 cm;
Systemic signs and symptoms may be present but not life threatening,
including but not limited to nausea, vomiting, oral paresthesia or unusual
tastes, mild hypotension (systolic blood pressure >90 mmHg), mild tachycardia
(heart rate <150), and tachypnea;
Coagulation parameters may be abnormal, but no clinical evidence
of bleeding present. Minor hematuria, gum bleeding and nosebleeds are
allowed if they are not considered severe in the investigators judgment. |
| Severe |
Swelling, pain, and ecchymosis involving more than an entire
extremity or threatening the airway;
Systemic signs and symptoms are markedly abnormal, including severe
alteration of mental status, severe hypotension, severe tachycardia, tachypnea,
or respiratory insufficiency;
Coagulation parameters are abnormal, with serious bleeding or severe
threat of bleeding. |
In both clinical studies, efficacy was determined using a Snakebite Severity
Score (SSS) [2] (referred to as the efficacy score or ES in these clinical studies)
and an investigator's clinical assessment (ICA) of efficacy. The SSS (referred
to as the ES) is a tool used to measure the severity of envenomation based on
six body categories: local wound (e.g., pain, swelling and ecchymosis), pulmonary,
cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, hematological, and nervous system effects.
A higher score indicates worse symptoms. In a retrospective study using medical
records of 108 snakebite victims [2], the SSS has been shown to correlate well
with physicians' assessment of the patient's condition at presentation (Pearson
correlation coefficient: r=0.63, p<0.0001) and when the patient's condition
was at its worst (r=0.70, p<0.0001). In this study, the condition of 87/108
patients worsened during hospitalization. Changes in the physicians' assessment
of condition correlated well with changes in SSS. CroFab was required to prevent
an increase in the ES in order to demonstrate efficacy.
The ICA was based on the investigator's clinical judgment as to whether the patient had a:
- Clinical response (pre-treatment signs and symptoms of envenomation were
arrested or improved after treatment)
- Partial response (signs and symptoms of envenomation worsened, but at a
slower rate than expected after treatment)
- Non-response (the patient's condition was not favorably affected by the
treatment).
Safety was assessed by monitoring for early allergic events, such as anaphylaxis and early serum reactions during CroFab infusion, and late events, such as late serum reactions.
TAb001
In the first clinical study of CroFab, 11 patients received an intravenous dose of 4 vials of CroFab over 60 minutes. An additional 4-vial dose of CroFab was administered after completion of the first CroFab infusion, if deemed necessary by the investigator. At the 1-hour assessment, 10 out of 11 patients had no change or a decrease in their ES. Ten of 11 patients were also judged to have a clinical response by the ICA. Several patients, after initial clinical response, subsequently required additional vials of CroFab to stem progressive or recurrent symptoms and signs. No patient in this first study experienced an anaphylactic or anaphylactoid response or evidence of an early or late serum reaction as a result of administration of CroFab.
TAb002
Based on observations from the first study, the second clinical study of CroFab compared two different dosage schedules. Patients were given an initial intravenous dose of 6 vials of CroFab with an option to retreat with an additional 6 vials, if needed, to achieve initial control of the envenomation syndrome. Initial control was defined as complete arrest of local manifestations, and return of coagulation tests and systemic signs to normal. Once initial control was achieved, patients were randomized to receive additional CroFab either every 6 hours for 18 hours (Scheduled Group) or as needed (PRN Group).
In this trial, CroFab was administered safely to 31 patients with minimal or
moderate crotalid envenomation. All 31 patients enrolled in the study achieved
initial control of their envenomation with CroFab, and 30, 25 and 26 of the
31 patients achieved a clinical response based on the ICA at 1, 6 and 12 hours
respectively following initial control. Additionally, the mean ES was significantly
decreased across the patient groups by the 12-hour evaluation time point (p=0.05
for the Scheduled Group; p=0.05 for the PRN Group) (see Table 4). There
was no statistically significant difference between the Scheduled Group and
the PRN Group with regard to the decrease in ES.
Table 4. Summary of Patient Efficacy Scores for Scheduled
and PRN Groups
| Time Period |
Scheduled Group (n=15)
Efficacy Score*
Mean ± SD |
PRN Group (n=16)
Efficacy Score*
Mean ± SD |
| Baseline |
4.0 ± 1.3 |
4.7 ± 2.5 |
| End of Initial Control Antivenin Infusion(s) |
3.2 ± 1.4 |
3.3 ± 1.3 |
| 1 hour after Initial Control achieved |
3.1 ± 1.3 |
3.2 ± 0.9 |
| 6 hours after Initial Control achieved |
2.6 ± 1.5 |
2.6 ± 1.3 |
| 12 hours after Initial Control achieved |
2.4 ± 1.1** |
2.4 ± 1.2** |
*No change or a decline in the Efficacy Score was considered
an indication of clinical response and a sign of efficacy.
**For both the Scheduled and the PRN Groups, differences in the Efficacy
Score at the four post-baseline assessment times were statistically decreased
from baseline by Friedman's test (p < 0.001). |
In published literature accounts of rattlesnake bites, it has been noted that
a decrease in platelets can accompany moderately severe envenomation, which
whole blood transfusions could not correct [3]. These platelet count decreases
have been observed to last for many hours and often several days following the
venomous bite [3, 4, 5]. In this clinical study, 6 patients had pre-dosing platelet
counts below 100,000/mm3 (baseline average of 44,000/mm3).
Of note, the platelet counts for all 6 patients increased to normal levels (average
209,000/ mm3) at 1 hour following initial control dosing with CroFab
(see Figure 1).
Figure 1. Graph of Platelet Counts from Baseline to 36 Hours
for Patients with Counts <100,000/mm3 at Baseline (Study TAb002)
Although there was no significant difference in the decrease in ES between
the two treatment groups, the data suggest that Scheduled dosing may provide
better control of envenomation symptoms caused by the continued leaking of venom
from depot sites. Scheduled patients experienced a lower incidence of coagulation
abnormalities at follow-up compared with PRN patients (see Table 5 and Figure
2). In addition, the need to administer additional CroFab to patients in
the PRN Group after initial control suggests that there is a continued need
for antivenin for adequate treatment.
Table 5. Lower Incidence of Recurrence of Coagulopathies
at Follow-Up in Scheduled and PRN Dosing Groups
| |
Scheduled Group (n=14)*
(percent of patients with abnormal values)^ |
PRN Group (n=16)
(percent of patients with abnormal values)^ |
| Platelet |
2/14 (14%)** |
9/16 (56%)** |
| Fibrinogen |
2/14 (14%) |
7/16 (44%) |
^Numbers are expressed as percent of patients that
had a follow-up platelet count that was less than the count at hospital
discharge, or a fibrinogen level less than 50% of the level at hospital
discharge.
*Follow-up data not available for one patient.
**Statistically significant difference, p=0.04 by Fisher's Exact test. |
Figure 2. Change in Platelet Counts in Individual Patients
between Follow-Up Visits and Discharge
Patients in the Scheduled and PRN Groups are plotted separately. More patients
in the PRN Group showed a reduction in platelet count after discharge than in
the Scheduled Group. Only patients showing a reduced platelet count after discharge
are shown.
REFERENCES
1. Consroe P, Egen NB, Russell FE, Gerrish K, Smith DC, Sidki A, et al. Comparison
of a new ovine antigen binding fragment (Fab) antivenin for United States Crotalidae
with the commercial antivenin for protection against venom-induced lethality
in mice. J Trop Med Hyg 1995; 53(5):507-510.
2. Dart RC, Hurlbut KM, Garcia R, Boren J. Validation of a severity score for
the assessment of Crotalid snakebite. Ann Emerg Med 1996; 27(3):321-326.
3. La Grange RG and Russell FE. Blood platelet studies in man and rabbits following
Crotalus envenomation. Proc West Pharmacol Soc 1970;13:99-105.
4. Lyons WJ. Profound thrombocytopenia associated with Crotalus ruber ruber
envenomation: a clinical case. Toxicon 1971; 9:237-240.
5. Tallon RW, Koch KL, Barnes SG, Ballard JO. Letter to Editor. N Engl J Med
1981;305:1347.
Last updated on RxList: 9/11/2008