General
Systemic absorption of topical corticosteroids has produced reversible HPA
axis suppression, manifestations of Cushing's syndrome, hyperglycemia, and glucosuria
in some patients.
Conditions which augment systemic absorption include the application of the
more potent corticosteroids, use over large surface areas, prolonged use, and
the addition of occlusive dressings. Use of more than one corticosteroid-containing
product at the same time may increase total systemic glucocorticoid exposure.
(See DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION section.)
Therefore, patients receiving a large dose of a potent topical steroid applied
to a large surface area should be evaluated periodically for evidence of HPA
axis suppression by using the urinary free cortisol and ACTH stimulation tests.
If HPA axis suppression is noted, an attempt should be made to withdraw the
drug, to reduce the frequency of application, or to substitute a less potent
steroid.
Recovery of HPA axis function is generally prompt and complete upon discontinuation
of the drug. In an open-label pediatric study of 60 evaluable patients, of the
19 who showed evidence of suppression 4 patients were tested 2 weeks after discontinuation
of DIPROLENE AF Cream 0.05%, and 3 of the 4 (75%) had complete recovery of HPA
axis function. Infrequently, signs and symptoms of steroid withdrawal may occur,
requiring supplemental systemic corticosteroids.
Children may absorb proportionally larger amounts of topical corticosteroids
and thus be more susceptible to systemic toxicity. (See PRECAUTIONS - Pediatric
Use.)
If irritation develops, topical corticosteroids should be discontinued and
appropriate therapy instituted.
In the presence of dermatological infections, the use of an appropriate antifungal
or antibacterial agent should be instituted. If a favorable response does not
occur promptly, the corticosteroid should be discontinued until the infection
has been adequately controlled.
Laboratory Tests
The following tests may be helpful in evaluating HPA axis suppression:
Urinary free cortisol test
ACTH stimulation test
Carcinogenesis, Mutagenesis, and Impairment of Fertility
Long-term animal studies have not been performed to evaluate the carcinogenic
potential of betamethasone dipropionate.
Betamethasone was negative in the bacterial mutagenicity assay (Salmonella
typhimurium and Escherichia coli), and in the mammalian cell mutagenicity
assay (CHO/HGPRT). It was positive in the in-vitro human lymphocyte chromosome
aberration assay, and equivocal in the in-vivo mouse bone marrow micronucleus
assay. This pattern of response is similar to that of dexamethasone and hydrocortisone.
Reproductive studies with betamethasone dipropionate carried out in rabbits
at doses of 1.0 mg/kg by the intramuscular route and in mice up to 33 mg/kg
by the intramuscular route indicated no impairment of fertility except for dose-related
increases in fetal resorption rates in both species. These doses are approximately
5- and 38-fold the human dose based on a mg/m2 comparison, respectively.
Pregnancy
Teratogenic Effects: Pregnancy Category C
Corticosteroids are generally teratogenic in laboratory animals when administered
systemically at relatively low dosage levels.
Betamethasone dipropionate has been shown to be teratogenic in rabbits when
given by the intramuscular route at doses of 0.05 mg/kg. This dose is approximately
0.2- fold the maximum human dose based on a mg/m2 comparison. The
abnormalities observed included umbilical hernias, cephalocele and cleft palates.
Some corticosteroids have been shown to be teratogenic after dermal application
in laboratory animals. There are no adequate and well-controlled studies in
pregnant women on teratogenic effects from topically applied corticosteroids.
Therefore, topical corticosteroids should be used during pregnancy only if the
potential benefit justifies the potential risk to the fetus. Drugs of this class
should not be used extensively on pregnant patients, in large amounts, or for
prolonged periods of time.
Nursing Mothers
It is not known whether topical administration of corticosteroids can result
in sufficient systemic absorption to produce detectable quantities in breast
milk. Systemically administered corticosteroids are secreted into breast milk
in quantities not likely to have a deleterious effect on the infant. Nevertheless,
a decision should be made whether to discontinue nursing or to discontinue the
drug, taking into account the importance of the drug to the mother.
Pediatric Use
Use of DIPROLENE AF Cream 0.05% in pediatric patients 12 years of age and younger
is not recommended. (See CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY
and ADVERSE REACTIONS sections.) In an open-label
study, 19 of 60 (32%) evaluable pediatric patients (aged 3 months-12 years old)
using DIPROLENE AF Cream 0.05% for treatment of atopic dermatitis demonstrated
HPA axis suppression. The proportion of patients with adrenal suppression in
this study was progressively greater, the younger the age group. (See CLINICAL
PHARMACOLOGY - Pharmacokinetics.)
Pediatric patients may demonstrate greater susceptibility to topical corticosteroid-induced
HPA axis suppression and Cushing's syndrome than mature patients because of
a larger skin surface area to body weight ratio. The study described above
supports this premise, as adrenal suppression in 9-12 year olds, 6-8 year olds,
2-5 year olds, and 3 months-1 year old was 17%, 32%, 38% and 50% respectively.
Hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis suppression, Cushing's syndrome,
and intracranial hypertension have been reported in children receiving topical
corticosteroids. Manifestations of adrenal suppression in children include linear
growth retardation, delayed weight gain, low plasma cortisol levels, and absence
of response to ACTH stimulation. Manifestations of intracranial hypertension
include bulging fontanelles, headaches, and bilateral papilledema. Chronic corticosteroid
therapy may interfere with the growth and development of children.
Geriatric Use
Clinical studies of DIPROLENE AF Cream 0.05% included 104 subjects who were
65 years of age and over and 8 subjects who were 75 years of age and over. No
overall differences in safety or effectiveness were observed between these subjects
and younger subjects, and other reported clinical experience has not identified
differences in responses between the elderly and younger patients. However,
greater sensitivity of some older individuals cannot be ruled out.
Last updated on RxList: 10/14/2008