The following adverse reactions to DYSPORT™ are discussed in greater detail in other sections of the labeling.
- Hypersensitivity [see CONTRAINDICATIONS]
- Dysphagia and Breathing Diffculties in Treatment of Cervical Dystonia [see
WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS]
- Spread of Effects from Toxin [see WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS]
Clinical Studies Experience
Because clinical trials are conducted under widely varying conditions, the
adverse reaction rates observed cannot be directly compared to rates in other
trials and may not refect the rates observed in clinical practice. The adverse
reaction information from clinical trials does, however, provide a basis for
identifying the adverse events that appear to be related to drug use and for
approximating incidence rates.
Cervical Dystonia
The data described below refect exposure to DYSPORT™ in 357 cervical dystonia patients in 6 studies. Of these, two studies were randomized, double-blind, single treatment, placebo controlled studies with subsequent optional open label treatment in which dose optimization (250 to 1000 Units per treatment) over the course of 5 treatment cycles was allowed.
The population was almost entirely Caucasian (99.2%) with a median age of 51
years (range 18-82 years). Most patients (86.6%) were less than 65 years of
age; 58.4% were women.
Common Adverse Events
The most commonly reported adverse events (occurring in more than 5% of patients who received 500 Units of DYSPORT™ in the placebo controlled clinical trials) in cervical dystonia patients were muscular weakness, dysphagia, dry mouth, injection site discomfort, fatigue, headache, neck pain, musculoskeletal pain, dysphonia, injection site pain, and eye disorders (consisting of blurred vision, diplopia, and reduced visual acuity and accommodation). Most adverse events were reported as mild or moderate in severity. Other than injection site reactions, most adverse events became noticeable about one week after treatment and lasted several weeks.
The rates of adverse events were higher in the combined controlled and open-label experience than in the placebo-controlled trials.
During the clinical studies, two patients ( < 1%) experienced adverse events leading to withdrawal. One patient experienced disturbance in attention, eyelid disorder, feeling abnormal and headache, and one patient experienced dysphagia.
Table 1: compares the incidence of the most frequent treatment-emergent adverse
events (TEAEs) from a single treatment cycle of 500 Units of DYSPORT™
compared to placebo [see Clinical Studies].
Table 1: Most Common TEAEs ( > 5%) and Greater than Placebo:
Double-blind Phase of Clinical Trials
System Organ Class
Preferred Term |
Double-blind Phase |
DYSPORT™ 500 Units
(N=173) |
Placebo
(N=182) |
| % |
% |
| Any TEAE |
61 |
51 |
| General disorders and administration site conditions |
30 |
23 |
| Injection site discomfort |
13 |
8 |
| Fatigue |
12 |
10 |
| Injection site pain |
5 |
4 |
| Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders |
30 |
18 |
| Muscular weakness |
16 |
4 |
| Musculoskeletal pain |
7 |
3 |
| Gastrointestinal disorders |
28 |
15 |
| Dysphagia |
15 |
4 |
| Dry mouth |
13 |
7 |
| Nervous system disorders |
16 |
13 |
| Headache |
11 |
9 |
| Infections and infestations |
13 |
9 |
| Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders |
12 |
8 |
| Dysphonia |
6 |
2 |
| Eye Disordersa |
7 |
2 |
| a The following preferred terms
were reported: vision blurred, diplopia, visual acuity reduced, eye pain,
eyelid disorder, accommodation disorder, dry eye, eye pruritus. |
Dose-response relationships for common adverse events in a randomized multiple
fxed-dose study in which the total dose was divided between two muscles
(the sternocleidomastoid and splenius capitis) are shown in Table 2.
Table 2: Common TEAEs by Dose in Fixed-dose Study
System Organ Class
Preferred Term |
DYSPORT™ Dose |
| Placebo |
250 Units |
500 Units |
1000 Units |
| Any Adverse Event |
30% |
37% |
65% |
83% |
| Dysphagia |
5% |
21% |
29% |
39% |
| Dry Mouth |
10% |
21% |
18% |
39% |
| Muscular Weakness |
0% |
11% |
12% |
56% |
| Injection Site Discomfort |
10% |
5% |
18% |
22% |
| Dysphonia |
0% |
0% |
18% |
28% |
| Facial Paresis |
0% |
5% |
0% |
11% |
| Eye Disorders |
0% |
0% |
6% |
17% |
Injection Site Reactions
Injection site discomfort and injection site pain were common adverse events
following DYSPORT™ administration. These events were mainly of mild or
moderate intensity.
Less Common Adverse Events
The following selected adverse events were reported less frequently ( < 5%).
Breathing Diffculties
Breathing diffculties were reported by approximately 3% of patients following DYSPORT™ administration and in 1% of placebo patients in clinical trials during the double-blind phase. These consisted mainly of dyspnea and were generally mild in intensity. The median time to onset from last dose of DYSPORT™ was approximately one week, and the median duration was approximately three weeks.
Other selected adverse events with incidences of less than 5% in the DYSPORT™
500 Units group in the double-blind phase of clinical trials included dizziness
in 3.5% of DYSPORT™ -treated subjects and 1% of placebo-treated subjects,
and muscle atrophy in 1% of DYSPORT™ -treated subjects and in none of
the placebo-treated subjects.
Laboratory Findings
Subjects treated with DYSPORT™ exhibited a small increase from baseline
(0.23 mol/L) in mean blood glucose relative to placebo-treated subjects. This
was not clinically signifcant among subjects in the development program but
could be a factor in patients whose diabetes is diffcult to control.
Electrocardiographic Findings
ECG measurements were only recorded in a limited number of subjects in an open-label
study without a placebo or active control. This study showed a statistically
signifcant reduction in heart rate compared to baseline, averaging about three
beats per minute, observed thirty minutes after injection.
Glabellar Lines
Because clinical trials are conducted under widely varying conditions, adverse reaction rates observed in the clinical trials of a drug cannot be directly compared to rates in the clinical trials of another drug and may not be predictive of rates observed in practice.
In placebo-controlled clinical trials of DYSPORT™, the most frequently
reported adverse events ( ≥ 2%) following injection of DYSPORT™ were
nasopharyngitis, headache, injection site pain, injection site reaction, upper
respiratory tract infection, eyelid edema, eyelid ptosis, sinusitis and nausea.
Table 3 refects exposure to DYSPORT™ in 398 subjects aged 19 to 75 who
were evaluated in the randomized, placebo-controlled clinical studies that assessed
the use of DYSPORT™ for the temporary improvement in the appearance of
glabellar lines [see Clinical Studies]. Adverse events of any cause were
reported for 48% of the DYSPORT™ -treated subjects and 33% of the placebo-treated
subjects. Treatment-emergent adverse events were generally mild to moderate
in severity.
Table 3: Treatment-emergent Adverse Events with > 1% incidence
| Adverse Events by Body System |
DYSPORT™
n=398 (%)* |
Placebo
n=496 (%)* |
| Any Treatment-emergent Adverse Event |
191 (48) |
163 (33) |
| Eye Disorders |
| Eyelid Edema |
8 (2) |
0 |
| Eyelid Ptosis |
6 (2) |
1 ( < 1) |
| Gastrointestinal Disorders |
| Nausea |
6 (2) |
5 (1) |
| General Disorders and Administration Site Conditions |
| Injection Site Pain |
11 (3) |
8 (2) |
| Injection Site Reaction |
12 (3) |
2 ( < 1) |
| Infections and Infestations |
| Nasopharyngitis |
38 (10) |
21 (4) |
| Upper Respiratory Tract Infection |
12 (3) |
9 (2) |
| Sinusitis |
8 (2) |
6 (1) |
| Investigations |
| Blood Urine Present |
6 (2) |
1 ( < 1) |
| Nervous System Disorders |
| Headache |
37 (9) |
23 (5) |
| * Subjects who received treatment with placebo and DYSPORT™ are
counted in both treatment columns.
|
In the overall safety database, where some subjects received up to twelve treatments
with DYSPORT™, adverse events were reported for 57% (1425/2491) of subjects.
The most frequently reported of these adverse events were headache, nasopharyngitis,
injection site pain, sinusitis, URI, injection site bruising, and injection
site reaction (numbness, discomfort, erythema, tenderness, tingling, itching,
stinging, warmth, irritation, tightness, swelling).
Adverse events that emerged after repeated injections in 2-3% of the population included bronchitis, infuenza, pharyngolaryngeal pain, cough, contact dermatitis, injection site swelling, and injection site discomfort.
The incidence of eyelid ptosis did not increase in the long-term safety studies
with multiple re-treatments at intervals ≥ three months. The majority of
eyelid ptosis events were mild to moderate in severity and resolved over several
weeks. [see Injection Technique].
Post-marketing Spontaneous Reports
There is extensive post-marketing experience outside the U.S. for the treatment of glabellar lines. Adverse reactions are reported voluntarily from a population of uncertain size; thus, it is not always possible to estimate their frequency reliably or to establish a causal relationship to drug exposure. The following adverse reactions have been identifed during post-marketing use: vertigo, eyelid ptosis, diplopia, vision blurred, photophobia, dysphagia, nausea, injection site reaction, malaise, infuenza-like illness, hypersensitivity, sinusitis, amyotrophy, burning sensation, facial paresis, dizziness, headache, hypoesthesia, erythema, and excessive granulation tissue.
Immunogenicity
As with all therapeutic proteins, there is a potential for immunogenicity.
The incidence of antibody formation is highly dependent on the sensitivity
and specifcity of the assay. In addition, the observed incidence of antibody
positivity in an assay may be infuenced by several factors including assay methodology,
sample handling, timing of sample collection, concomitant medications, and underlying
disease. For these reasons, comparison of the incidence of antibodies across
products in this class may be misleading.
Cervical Dystonia
About 3% of subjects developed antibodies (binding or neutralizing) over time
with DYSPORT™ treatment. The signifcance of these antibodies is unknown
since in the presence of binding and neutralizing antibodies some patients may
continue to experience clinical beneft.
Glabellar Lines
Testing for antibodies to DYSPORT™ was performed for 1554 subjects who had up to nine cycles of treatment. Two subjects (0.13%) tested positive for binding antibodies at baseline. Three additional subjects tested positive for binding antibodies after receiving DYSPORT™ treatment. None of the subjects tested positive for neutralizing antibodies.