Mechanism of Action
Many breast cancers have estrogen receptors (ER), and the growth of these tumors can be stimulated by estrogen. Fulvestrant is an estrogen receptor antagonist that binds to the estrogen receptor in a competitive manner with affinity comparable to that of estradiol. Fulvestrant downregulates the ER protein in human breast cancer cells.
In a clinical study in postmenopausal women with primary breast cancer treated with single doses of FASLODEX 15-22 days prior to surgery, there was evidence of increasing down regulation of ER with increasing dose. This was associated with a dose-related decrease in the expression of the progesterone receptor, an estrogen-regulated protein. These effects on the ER pathway were also associated with a decrease in Ki67 labeling index, a marker of cell proliferation.
In vitro studies demonstrated that fulvestrant is a reversible inhibitor
of the growth of tamoxifen-resistant, as well as estrogen-sensitive human breast
cancer (MCF-7) cell lines. In in vivo tumor studies, fulvestrant delayed
the establishment of tumors from xenografts of human breast cancer MCF-7 cells
in nude mice. Fulvestrant inhibited the growth of established MCF-7 xenografts
and of tamoxifen-resistant breast tumor xenografts. Fulvestrant resistant breast
tumor xenografts may also be cross-resistant to tamoxifen.
Fulvestrant showed no agonist-type effects in in vivo uterotropic assays
in immature or ovariectomized mice and rats. In in vivo studies in immature
rats and ovariectomized monkeys, fulvestrant blocked the uterotrophic action
of estradiol. In postmenopausal women, the absence of changes in plasma concentrations
of FSH and LH in response to fulvestrant treatment (250 mg monthly) suggests
no peripheral steroidal effects.
Pharmacokinetics
Following intravenous administration, fulvestrant is rapidly cleared at a rate
approximating hepatic blood flow (about 10.5 mL plasma/min/Kg). After an intramuscular
injection plasma concentrations are maximal at about 7 days and are maintained
over a period of at least one month, with trough concentration about one-third
of Cmax. The apparent half-life was about 40 days. After administration of 250
mg of fulvestrant intramuscularly every month, plasma levels approach steady-state
after 3 to 6 doses, with an average 2.5 fold increase in plasma AUC, compared
to single dose AUC and trough levels about equal to the single dose Cmax (see
Table 1).
Table 1: Summary of fulvestrant pharmacokinetic parameters
in postmenopausal advanced breast cancer patients after intramuscular administration
of a 250 mg dose (Mean ± SD)
| |
Cmax
ng/mL |
Cmin
ng/mL |
AUC
ng·d/mL |
t 1/2 days |
CL
mL/min |
| Single dose |
8.5 ± 5.4 | 2.6 ± 1.1 |
131 ± 62 |
40 ± 11 |
690 ± 226 |
| Multiple dose steady state |
15.8 ± 2.4 | 7.4 ± 1.7 |
328 ± 48 |
|
|
Fulvestrant was subject to extensive and rapid distribution. The apparent volume of distribution at steady state was approximately 3 to 5 L/kg. This suggests that distribution is largely extravascular. Fulvestrant was highly (99%) bound to plasma proteins; VLDL, LDL and HDL lipoprotein fractions appear to be the major binding components. The role of sex hormone-binding globulin, if any, could not be determined.
Metabolism and Excretion
Biotransformation and disposition of fulvestrant in humans have been determined
following intramuscular and intravenous administration of 14C-labeled
fulvestrant. Metabolism of fulvestrant appears to involve combinations of a
number of possible biotransformation pathways analogous to those of endogenous
steroids, including oxidation, aromatic hydroxylation, conjugation with glucuronic
acid and/or sulphate at the 2, 3 and 17 positions of the steroid nucleus, and
oxidation of the side chain sulphoxide. Identified metabolites are either less
active or exhibit similar activity to fulvestrant in antiestrogen models. Studies
using human liver preparations and recombinant human enzymes indicate that cytochrome
P-450 3A4 (CYP 3A4) is the only P-450 isoenzyme involved in the oxidation of
fulvestrant; however, the relative contribution of P-450 and non-P-450 routes
in vivo is unknown.
Fulvestrant was rapidly cleared by the hepatobiliary route, with excretion primarily via the feces (approximately 90%). Renal elimination was negligible (less than 1%).
Special Populations
Geriatric: In patients with breast cancer, there was no difference
in fulvestrant pharmacokinetic profile related to age (range 33 to 89 years).
Gender: Following administration of a single intravenous dose,
there were no pharmacokinetic differences between men and women or between premenopausal
and postmenopausal women. Similarly, there were no differences between men and
postmenopausal women after intramuscular administration.
Race: In the advanced breast cancer treatment trials, the potential
for pharmacokinetic differences due to race have been evaluated in 294 women
including 87.4% Caucasian, 7.8% Black, and 4.4% Hispanic. No differences in
fulvestrant plasma pharmacokinetics were observed among these groups. In a separate
trial, pharmacokinetic data from postmenopausal ethnic Japanese women were similar
to those obtained in non-Japanese patients.
Renal Impairment: Negligible amounts of fulvestrant are eliminated
in urine; therefore, a study in patients with renal impairment was not conducted.
In the advanced breast cancer trials, fulvestrant concentrations in women with
estimated creatinine clearance as low as 30 mL/min were similar to women with
normal creatinine.
Hepatic Impairment: Fulvestrant is metabolized primarily in the
liver. In clinical trials in patients with locally advanced or metastatic breast
cancer, pharmacokinetic data were obtained following administration of a 250
mg dose of FASLODEX to 261 patients classified as having normal liver function
and to 24 patients with mild impairment. Mild impairment was defined as an alanine
aminotransferase concentration (at any visit) greater than the upper limit of
the normal (ULN) reference range, but less than 2 times the ULN; or if any 2
of the following 3 parameters were between 1- and 2-times the ULN: aspartate
aminotransferase, alkaline phosphatase, or total bilirubin.
There was no clear relationship between fulvestrant clearance and hepatic impairment
and the safety profile in patients with mild hepatic impairment was similar
to that seen in patients with no hepatic impairment. Safety and efficacy have
not been evaluated in patients with moderate to severe hepatic impairment (see
PRECAUTIONS - Hepatic Impairment and DOSAGE
AND ADMINISTRATION - Hepatic Impairment sections).
Pediatric: The pharmacokinetics of fulvestrant have not been
evaluated in pediatric patients.
Drug-Drug Interactions
There are no known drug-drug interactions. Fulvestrant does not significantly
inhibit any of the major CYP isoenzymes, including CYP 1A2, 2C9, 2C19, 2D6,
and 3A4 in vitro, and studies of co-administration of fulvestrant with
midazolam indicate that therapeutic doses of fulvestrant have no inhibitory
effects on CYP 3A4 or alter blood levels of drug metabolized by that enzyme.
Although fulvestrant is partly metabolized by CYP 3A4, a clinical study with
rifampin, an inducer of CYP 3A4, showed no effect on the pharmacokinetics of
fulvestrant. Also results from a healthy volunteer study with ketoconazole,
a potent inhibitor of CYP 3A4, indicated that ketoconazole had no effect on
the pharmacokinetics of fulvestrant and dosage adjustment is not necessary in
patients co-prescribed CYP 3A4 inhibitors or inducers.
Clinical Studies
Efficacy of FASLODEX was established by comparison to the selective aromatase inhibitor anastrozole in two randomized, controlled clinical trials (one conducted in North America, the other in predominately Europe) in postmenopausal women with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer. All patients had progressed after previous therapy with an antiestrogen or progestin for breast cancer in the adjuvant or advanced disease setting. The majority of patients in these trials had ER+ and/or PgR+ tumors. Patients who had ER-/PgR- or unknown disease must have shown prior response to endocrine therapy.
In both trials, eligible patients with measurable and/or evaluable disease were randomized to receive either FASLODEX 250 mg intramuscularly once a month (28 days ± 3 days) or anastrozole 1 mg orally once a day. All patients were assessed monthly for the first three months and every three months thereafter. The North American trial was a double-blind, randomized trial in 400 postmenopausal women. The European trial was an open, randomized trial conducted in 451 patients. Patients on the FASLODEX arm of the North American trial received two separate injections (2 x 2.5 mL), whereas FASLODEX patients received a single injection (1 x 5 mL) in the European trial. In both trials, patients were initially randomized to a 125 mg per month dose as well, but interim analysis showed a very low response rate and low dose groups were dropped.
The effectiveness endpoints were response rates (RR), based on the Union Internationale Contre le Cancer (UICC) criteria, and time to progression (TTP). Survival time was also determined. Confidence intervals (95.4%) were calculated for the difference in RR between the FASLODEX and anastrozole groups. The hazard ratio for an unfavorable event, (such as disease progression or death) between FASLODEX and anastrozole groups was also determined.
Table 2 provides the demographics and baseline characteristics of the postmenopausal women randomized to FASLODEX 250 mg or anastrozole 1 mg.
Table 2: Study Population Demographics
| |
North American Trial |
European Trial |
| Parameter |
FASLODEX
250 mg |
Anastrozole
1 mg |
FASLODEX
250 mg |
Anastrozole
1 mg |
| No. of Participants |
206 |
194 |
222 |
229 |
| Median Age (yrs) |
64 |
61 |
64 |
65 |
| Age Range (yrs) |
33–89 |
36–94 |
35–86 |
33–89 |
| Receptor Status # (%) |
| ER Positive |
170 (83%) |
156 (80%) |
156 (70%) |
173 (76%) |
| ER/PgR Positive |
179 (87%) |
169 (87%) |
163 (73%) |
183 (80%) |
| ER/PgR Unknown |
13 (6%) |
15 (8%) |
51 (23%) |
37 (16%) |
| Previous Therapy |
| Tamoxifen |
196 (95%) |
187 (96%) |
215 (97%) |
225 (98%) |
| Adjuvant antiestrogen only |
94 (46%) |
94 (48%) |
95 (43%) |
100 (44%) |
| Antiestrogen for advanced disease +/- adjuvant use |
110 (53%) |
97 (50%) |
126 (57%) |
129 (56%) |
| Cytotoxic Chemotherapy |
129 (63%) |
122 (63%) |
94 (42%) |
98 (43%) |
| Site of Metastases |
| Visceral only* |
39 (19%) |
45 (23%) |
30 (14%) |
41 (18%) |
| Visceral Liver involvement |
47 (23%) |
45 (23%) |
48 (22%) |
56 (24%) |
| Visceral Lung involvement |
63 (31%) |
60 (31%) |
56 (25%) |
60 (26%) |
| Bone only |
47 (23%) |
43 (22%) |
38 (17%) |
40 (17%) |
| Soft Tissue only |
12 (6%) |
13 (7%) |
11 (5%) |
8 (3%) |
| Skin and soft tissue |
43 (21%) |
41 (21%) |
40 (18%) |
35 (15%) |
*Defined as liver or lung metastatic, or recurrent, disease
ER/PgR Positive defined as ER positive or PgR positive
ER/PgR Unknown defined as ER unknown and PgR unknown |
Results of the trials, after a minimum follow-up duration of 14.6months, are
summarized in Table 3. The effectiveness of FASLODEX 250 mg was determined by
comparing RR and TTP results to anastrozole 1 mg, the active control. With respect
to response rate, the two studies ruled out (by one-sided 97.7% confidence limit)
inferiority of FASLODEX to anastrozole of 6.3% and 1.4%. There was no statistically
significant difference in the survival time between the two treatment groups.
Table 3: Efficacy Results
| |
North American Trial |
European Trial |
| Endpoint |
FASLODEX
250 mg
(n=206) |
Anastrozole
1 mg
(n=194) |
FASLODEX
250 mg
(n=222) |
Anastrozole
1 mg
(n=229) |
| Objective tumor response Number (%) of subjects with CR + PR |
35 (17.0) |
33 (17.0) |
45 (20.3) |
34 (14.9) |
| % Difference in Tumor Response Rate (FAS-ANA) 2-sided 95.4% CI |
0.0
(-6.3,8.9) |
5.4
(-1.4,14.8) |
| Time to progression (TTP) |
|
|
|
|
| Median TTP (days) |
165 |
103 |
166 |
156 |
| Hazard ratio (FAS/ANA) 2-sided 95.4% CI |
0.9
(0.7,1.1) |
1.0
(0.8,1.2) |
| Stable Disease for ≥ 24 weeks (%) |
26.7 |
19.1 |
24.3 |
30.1 |
Survival Time
Died n (%) |
152 (73.8%) |
149 (76.8%) |
167 (75.2%) |
173 (75.5%) |
| Median Survival (days) |
844 |
913 |
803 |
736 |
| Hazard ratio 2-sided 95% CI |
0.98
(0.78,1.24) |
0.97
(0.78,1.21) |
| CR = Complete Response; PR= PartialResponse; CI= Confidence
Interval; FAS = FASLODEX; ANA =anastrozole |
There are no efficacy data for the use of FASLODEX in premenopausal women with
advanced breast cancer (women with functioning ovaries as evidenced by menstruation
and/or premenopausal LH, FSH and estradiol levels).
Last updated on RxList: 12/15/2008