Endogenous estrogens are largely responsible for the development and maintenance
of the female reproductive system and secondary sexual characteristics. Although
circulating estrogens exist in a dynamic equilibrium of metabolic interconversions,
estradiol is the principal intracellular human estrogen and is substantially
more potent than its metabolites estrone and estriol at the receptor level.
The primary source of estrogen in normally cycling adult women is the ovarian
follicle, which secretes 70 to 500 mcg of estradiol daily, depending on the
phase of the menstrual cycle. After menopause, most endogenous estrogen is produced
by conversion of androstenedione, secreted by the adrenal cortex, to estrone
by peripheral tissues. Thus, estrone and the sulfate conjugated form, estrone
sulfate, are the most abundant circulating estrogens in postmenopausal women.
The pharmacologic effects of ethinyl estradiol are similar to those of endogenous
estrogens.
Estrogens act through binding to nuclear receptors in estrogen-responsive tissues.
To date, two estrogen receptors have been identified. These vary in proportion
from tissue to tissue.
Circulating estrogens modulate the pituitary secretion of the gonadotropins,
luteinizing hormone (LH) and follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) through a negative
feedback mechanism. Estrogens act to reduce the elevated levels of these hormones
seen in postmenopausal women.
Progestin compounds enhance cellular differentiation and generally oppose the
actions of estrogens by decreasing estrogen receptor levels, increasing local
metabolism of estrogens to less active metabolites, or inducing gene products
that blunt cellular responses to estrogen. Progestins exert their effects in
target cells by binding to specific progesterone receptors that interact with
progesterone response elements in target genes. Progesterone receptors have
been identified in the female reproductive tract, breast, pituitary, hypothalamus,
bone, skeletal tissue and central nervous system. Progestins produce similar
endometrial changes to those of the naturally occurring hormone progesterone.
Pharmacokinetics
Absorption
Norethindrone acetate (NA) is completely and rapidly deacetylated to norethindrone
after oral administration, and the disposition of norethindrone acetate is indistinguishable
from that of orally administered norethindrone. Norethindrone acetate and ethinyl
estradiol (EE) are rapidly absorbed from femhrt tablets, with maximum
plasma concentrations of norethindrone and ethinyl estradiol generally occurring
1 to 2 hours postdose. Both are subject to first-pass metabolism after oral
dosing, resulting in an absolute bioavailability of approximately 64% for norethindrone
and 55% for ethinyl estradiol. Bioavailability of femhrt tablets is similar
to that from solution for norethindrone and slightly less for ethinyl estradiol.
Administration of femhrt tablets with a high fat meal decreases rate
but not extent of ethinyl estradiol absorption. The extent of norethindrone
absorption is increased by 27% following administration of femhrt tablets
with food.
The full pharmacokinetic profile of femhrt tablets was not characterized
due to assay sensitivity limitations. However, the multiple-dose pharmacokinetics
were studied at a dose of 1 mg NA/10 mcg EE in 18 post-menopausal
women. Mean plasma concentrations are shown below (Figure 1) and pharmacokinetic
parameters are found in Table 1. Based on a population pharmacokinetic analysis,
mean steady-state concentrations of norethindrone for 1 mg NA/5 mcg
EE and 1/10 are slightly more than proportional to dose when compared to 0.5
mg NA/2.5 mcg EE tablets. It can be explained by higher sex hormone
binding globulin (SHBG) concentrations. Mean steady-state plasma concentrations
of ethinyl estradiol for the femhrt 0.5/2.5 tablets and femhrt 1/5
tablets are proportional to dose, but there is a less than proportional increase
in steady-state concentrations for the NA/EE 1/10 tablet.
Figure 1. Mean Steady-State (Day 87) Plasma Norethindrone
and Ethinyl Estradiol Concentrations Following Continuous Oral Administration
of 1 mg NA/10 mcg EE Tablets
Table 1. Mean (SD) Single-Dose (Day 1) and Steady-State (Day
87) Pharmacokinetic Parametersa Following Administration of 1 mg
NA/10 mcg EE Tablets
| Norethindrone |
Cmax
ng/mL |
tmax
hr |
AUC(0-24)
ng•hr/mL |
CL/F
mL/min |
t½ hr |
| Day 1 |
6.0 (3.3) |
1.8 (0.8) |
29.7 (16.5) |
588 (416) |
10.3 (3.7) |
| Day 87 |
10.7 (3.6) |
1.8 (0.8) |
81.8 (36.7) |
226 (139) |
13.3 (4.5) |
| Ethinyl Estradiol |
pg/mL |
hr |
pg•hr/mL |
mL/min |
hr |
| Day 1 |
33.5(13.7) |
2.2 (1.0) |
339 (113) |
NDb |
NDb |
| Day 87 |
38.3(11.9) |
1.8 (0.7) |
471 (132) |
383 (119) |
23.9 (7.1) |
a Cmax = Maximum plasma concentration;
tmax = time of Cmax; AUC(0-24) = Area under the plasma concentration-time
curve over the dosing interval; and CL/F = Apparent oral clearance; t½
= Elimination half-life
bND=Not determined |
Based on a population pharmacokinetic analysis, average steady-state concentrations
(Css) of norethindrone and ethinyl estradiol for femhrt 1/5 tablets are
estimated to be 2.6 ng/mL and 11.4 pg/mL, respectively. Css values of norethindrone
and ethinyl estradiol for femhrt 0.5/2.5 tablets are estimated to be
1.1 ng/mL and 5.4 ng/mL, respectively.
The pharmacokinetics of ethinyl estradiol and norethindrone acetate were not
affected by age, (age range 40-62 years), in the postmenopausal population studied.
Distribution
The distribution of exogenous estrogens is similar to that of endogenous estrogens.
Estrogens are widely distributed in the body and are generally found in higher
concentrations in the sex hormone target organs. Estrogens circulate in the
blood largely bound to sex hormone binding globulin (SHBG) and albumin.
Volume of distribution of norethindrone and ethinyl estradiol ranges from 2
to 4 L/kg. Plasma protein binding of both steroids is extensive ( > 95%); norethindrone
binds to both albumin and sex hormone binding globulin (SHBG), whereas ethinyl
estradiol binds only to albumin. Although ethinyl estradiol does not bind to
SHBG, it induces SHBG synthesis.
Metabolism
Exogenous estrogens are metabolized in the same manner as endogenous estrogens.
Circulating estrogens exist in a dynamic equilibrium of metabolic interconversions.
These transformations take place mainly in the liver. Estradiol is converted
reversibly to estrone, and both can be converted to estriol, which is the major
urinary metabolite. Estrogens also undergo enterohepatic recirculation via sulfate
and glucuronide conjugation in the liver, biliary secretion of conjugates into
the intestine, and hydrolysis in the gut followed by reabsorption. In postmenopausal
women, a significant proportion of the circulating estrogens exist as sulfate
conjugates, especially estrone sulfate, which serves as a circulating reservoir
for the formation of more active estrogens.
Norethindrone undergoes extensive biotransformation, primarily via reduction,
followed by sulfate and glucuronide conjugation. The majority of metabolites
in the circulation are sulfates, with glucuronides accounting for most of the
urinary metabolites. A small amount of norethindrone acetate is metabolically
converted to ethinyl estradiol, such that exposure to ethinyl estradiol following
administration of 1 mg of norethindrone acetate is equivalent to oral
administration of 2.8 mcg ethinyl estradiol. Ethinyl estradiol is also
extensively metabolized, both by oxidation and by conjugation with sulfate and
glucuronide. Sulfates are the major circulating conjugates of ethinyl estradiol
and glucuronides predominate in urine. The primary oxidative metabolite is 2-hydroxy
ethinyl estradiol, formed by the CYP3A4 isoform of cytochrome P450. Part of
the first-pass metabolism of ethinyl estradiol is believed to occur in gastrointestinal
mucosa. Ethinyl estradiol may undergo enterohepatic circulation.
Excretion
Estradiol, estrone, and estriol are excreted in the urine along with glucuronide
and sulfate conjugates.
Norethindrone and ethinyl estradiol are excreted in both urine and feces, primarily
as metabolites. Plasma clearance values for norethindrone and ethinyl estradiol
are similar (approximately 0.4 L/hr/kg). Steady-state elimination half-lives
of norethindrone and ethinyl estradiol following administration of 1 mg
NA/10 mcg EE tablets are approximately 13 hours and 24 hours, respectively.
Special Populations
Pediatric
femhrt is not indicated in children.
Geriatrics
The pharmacokinetics of femhrt have not been studied in a geriatric
population.
Race
The effect of race on the pharmacokinetics of femhrt has not been studied.
Patients with Renal Insufficiency
The effect of renal disease on the disposition of femhrt has not been
evaluated. In premenopausal women with chronic renal failure undergoing peritoneal
dialysis who received multiple doses of an oral contraceptive containing ethinyl
estradiol and norethindrone, plasma ethinyl estradiol concentrations were higher
and norethindrone concentrations were unchanged compared to concentrations in
premenopausal women with normal renal function (See PRECAUTIONS,
Fluid Retention.)
Patients with Hepatic Impairment
The effect of hepatic disease on the disposition of femhrt has not been
evaluated. However, ethinyl estradiol and norethindrone may be poorly metabolized
in patients with impaired liver function (See PRECAUTIONS.)
Drug Interactions
See PRECAUTIONS: DRUG INTERACTIONS.
In vitro and in vivo studies have shown that estrogens are metabolized partially
by cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4). Therefore, inducers or inhibitors of CYP3A4
may affect estrogen drug metabolism. Inducers of CYP3A4 such as St. John's Wort
preparations (Hypericum perforatum), phenobarbital, carbamazepine, and rifampin
may reduce plasma concentrations of estrogens, possibly resulting in a decrease
in therapeutic effects and/or changes in the uterine bleeding profile. Inhibitors
of CYP3A4 such as erythromycin, clarithromycin, ketoconazole, itraconazole,
ritonavir and grapefruit juice may increase plasma concentrations of estrogens
and may result in side effects.
Clinical Studies
Effects on Vasomotor Symptoms
A 12-week placebo-controlled, multicenter, randomized clinical trial was conducted
in 266 symptomatic women who had at least 56 moderate to severe hot flushes
during the week prior to randomization. On average, patients had 12 hot flushes
per day upon study entry.
A total of 66 women were randomized to receive femhrt 1/5, 67 women
were randomized to receive femhrt 0.5/2.5 and 66 women were randomized
to the placebo group. femhrt 1/5 and femhrt 0.5/2.5 were shown
to be statistically better than placebo at weeks 4 and 12 for relief of the
frequency of moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms. See Table 2. In Table 3,
femhrt 1/5 was shown to be statistically better than placebo at weeks
4 and 12 for relief of the severity of moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms;
femhrt 0.5/2.5 was shown to be statistically better than placebo at weeks
5 and 12 for relief of the severity of moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms.
Table 2. Mean Change from Baseline in the Number of Moderate
to Severe Vasomotor Symptoms per Week - ITT Population, LOCF
| Visit |
Placebo
(N=66) |
femhrt
0.5/2.5
(N=67) |
femhrt
1 / 5
(N=66) |
| Baseline [1] |
| Mean (SD) |
76.5 (21.4) |
77.6 (26.5) |
70.0 (16.6) |
| Week 4 |
| Mean (SD) |
39.4 (27.6) |
30.2 (26.1) |
20.4 (22.7) |
| Mean Change from Baseline (SD) |
-37.0 (26.6) |
-47.4* (26.1) |
-49.6* (22.1) |
| p-Value vs. Placebo (95% CI) [2] |
|
0.041 (-20.0, -1.0) |
< 0.001 (-22.0,-6.0) |
| Week 12 |
| Mean (SD) |
31.1 (27.0) |
13.8 (20.4) |
11.3 (18.9) |
| Mean Change from Baseline (SD) |
-45.3 (30.2) |
-63.8* (27.5) |
-58.7* (23.1) |
| p-Value vs. Placebo (95% CI) [2] |
|
< 0.001 (-27.0, -7.0) |
< 0.001 (-25.0, -5.0) |
* Denotes statistical significance at the
0.05 level
[1] The baseline number of moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms (MSVS)
is the weekly average number of MSVS during the two week prerandomization
observation period.
[2] ANCOVA - Analysis of Covariance model where the observation variable
is change from baseline; independent variables include treatment, center
and baseline as covariate. The 95% CI - Mann-Whitney confidence interval
for the difference between means (not stratified by center).
ITT = intent to treat; LOCF = last observation carried forward; CI = confidence
interval 2 randomized subjects (1 in Placebo and 1 in femhrt) did
not return diaries. |
Table 3. Mean Change from Baseline in the Daily Severity
Score of Moderate to Severe Vasomotor Symptoms per Week - ITT Population, LOCF
| Visit |
Placebo
(N=66) |
femhrt
0.5/2.5
(N=67) |
femhrt
1 / 5
(N=66) |
| Baseline [1] |
| Mean (SD) |
2.49 (0.26) |
2.48 (0.22) |
2.47 (0.23) |
| Week 4 |
| Mean (SD) |
2.13 (0.74) |
1.88 (0.89) |
1.45 (1.03) |
| Mean Change from Baseline (SD) |
-0.36 (0.68) |
-0.59 (0.83) |
-1.02* (1.06) |
| p-Value vs. Placebo (95% CI) [2] |
- |
0.130 (-0.3, 0.0) |
< 0.001 (-0.9, -0.2) |
| Week 5 |
| Mean (SD) |
2.06 (0.79) |
1.68 (0.99) |
1.23 (1.03) |
| Mean Change from Baseline (SD) |
-0.44 (0.74) |
-0.80* (0.94) |
-1.24* (1.07) |
| p-Value vs. Placebo (95% CI) [2] |
- |
0.041 (-0.4, -0.0) |
< 0.001 (-1.2, -0.3) |
| Week 12 |
| Mean (SD) |
1.82 (1.03) |
1.22 (1.11) |
1.02 (1.16) |
| Mean Change from Baseline (SD) |
-0.67 (1.02) |
-1.26* (1.08) |
-1.45* (1.19) |
| p-Value vs. Placebo (95% CI) [2] |
- |
0.002 (-0.9, -0.2) |
< 0.001 (-1.4, -0.3) |
* Denotes statistical significance at the
0.05 level
[1] The baseline severity of moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms (MSVS)
is the daily severity score of MSVS during the two week prerandomization
observation period.
[2] ANCOVA - Analysis of Covariance model where the observation variable
is change from baseline; independent variables include treatment, center
and baseline as covariate. The 95% CI - Mann-Whitney confidence interval
for the difference between means (not stratified by center).
ITT = intent to treat; LOCF = last observation carried forward; CI = confidence
interval 2 randomized subjects (1 in Placebo and 1 in femhrt) did
not return diaries. |
Endometrial Hyperplasia
A 2-year, placebo-controlled, multicenter, randomized clinical trial was conducted
to determine the safety and efficacy of femhrt on maintaining bone mineral
density, protecting the endometrium, and to determine effects on lipids. A total
of 1265 women were enrolled and randomized to either placebo, 0.2 mg
NA/1 mcg EE, femhrt 0.5/2.5, femhrt 1/5 and 1 mg
NA/10 mcg EE or matching unopposed EE doses (1, 2.5, 5, or 10 mcg)
for a total of 9 treatment groups. All participants received 1000 mg of calcium
supplementation daily. Of the 1265 women randomized to the various treatment
arms of this study, 137 were randomized to placebo, 146 to femhrt 1/5,
136 to femhrt 0.5/2.5 and 141 to EE 5 mcg and 137 to EE 2.5 mcg.
Of these, 134 placebo, 143 femhrt 1/5, 136 femhrt 0.5/2.5, 139
EE 5 mcg and 137 EE 2.5 mcg had a baseline endometrial result.
Baseline biopsies were classified as normal (in approximately 95% of subjects),
or insufficient tissue (in approximately 5% of subjects). Follow-up biopsies
were obtained in approximately 70-80% of patients in each arm after 12 and 24
months of therapy. Results are shown in Table 4.
Table 4. Endometrial Biopsy Results After 12 and 24 Months
of Treatment (CHART Study, 376-359)
| Endometrial Status |
Placebo |
femhrt |
EE Alone |
| 0.5/2.5 |
1/5 |
2.5 μg |
5 μg |
| Number of Patients Biopsied at Baseline |
N=134 |
N=136 |
N=143 |
N=137 |
N=139 |
| MONTH 12 (% Patients) |
| Patients Biopsied (%) |
113 (84) |
103 (74) |
110 (77) |
100 (73) |
114 (82) |
| Insufficient Tissue |
30 |
34 |
45 |
20 |
20 |
| Atrophic Tissue |
60 |
41 |
41 |
15 |
2 |
| Proliferative Tissue |
23 |
28 |
24 |
65 |
91 |
| Endometrial Hyperplasiaa |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
| MONTH 24 (% Patients) |
| Patients Biopsied (%) |
94 (70) |
99 (73) |
102 (71) |
89 (65) |
107 (77) |
| Insufficient Tissue |
35 |
42 |
37 |
23 |
17 |
| Atrophic Tissue |
38 |
30 |
33 |
6 |
2 |
| Proliferative Tissue |
20 |
27 |
32 |
60 |
86 |
| Endometrial Hyperplasiaa |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
| aAll patients with endometrial hyperplasia
were carried forward for all time points |
Irregular Bleeding/Spotting
The cumulative incidence of amenorrhea, defined as no bleeding or spotting
obtained from subject recall, was evaluated over 12 months for femhrt 0.5/2.5,
femhrt 1/5 and placebo arms. Results are shown in Figure 2.
Figure 2. Patients with Cumulative Amenorrhea Over Time:
Intent-tp-Treat Population, Last Observation Carried Forward
Effect on Bone Mineral Density
In the 2 year study, trabecular bone mineral density (BMD) was assessed at
lumbar spine using quantitative computed tomography. A total of 419 postmenopausal
primarily Caucasian women, aged 40 to 64 years, with intact uteri and non-osteoporotic
bone mineral densities were randomized (1:1:1) to femhrt 1/5, femhrt
0.5/2.5 or placebo. Approximately 75% of the subjects in each group completed
the two-year study. All patients received 1000 mg calcium in divided doses.
Vitamin D was not supplemented.
As shown in Figure 3, women treated with femhrt 1/5 had an average increase
of 3.1% in lumbar spine BMD from baseline to Month 24. Women treated with femhrt
0.5/2.5 and placebo had average decreases of –0.8% and –6.3%, respectively,
in spinal BMD from baseline to Month 24. The differences in the changes from
baseline to Month 24 in the two femhrt groups compared with the placebo
group were statistically significant.
It should be noted that when measured by QCT, BMD gains and losses are greater
than when measured by dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Therefore, the differences
in the changes in BMD between the placebo and active drug treated groups will
be larger when measured by QCT compared with DXA. Changes in BMD measured by
DXA should not be compared with changes in BMD measured by QCT.
Figure 3
*It should be noted that when measured by QCT, BMD gains and losses are greater
than when measured by dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Therefore, the differences
in the changes in BMD between the placebo and active drug treated groups will
be larger when measured by QCT compared with DXA. Changes in BMD measured by
DXA should not be compared with changes in BMD measured by QCT.
Women's Health Initiative Studies
The Women's Health Initiative (WHI) enrolled a total of 27,000 predominantly
healthy postmenopausal women to assess the risks and benefits of either the
use of oral 0.625 mg conjugated estrogens (CE) per day alone or the use of oral
0.625 mg conjugated estrogens plus 2.5 mg medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA)
per day compared to placebo in the prevention of certain chronic diseases. The
primary endpoint was the incidence of coronary heart disease (CHD) (nonfatal
myocardial infarction and CHD death), with invasive breast cancer as the primary
adverse outcome studied. A “global index” included the earliest
occurrence of CHD, invasive breast cancer, stroke, pulmonary embolism (PE),
endometrial cancer, colorectal cancer, hip fracture, or death due to other cause.
The study did not evaluate the effects of CE or CE/MPA on menopausal symptoms.
The CE/MPA substudy was stopped early because, according to the predefined
stopping rule, the increased risk of breast cancer and cardiovascular events
exceeded the specified benefits included in the “global index.”
Results of the CE/MPA substudy, which included 16,608 women (average age of
63 years, range 50 to 79; 83.9% White, 6.5% Black, 5.5% Hispanic), after an
average follow-up of 5.2 years are presented in Table 5 below:
Table 5. RELATIVE AND ABSOLUTE RISK SEEN IN THE CE/MPA SUBSTUDY
OF WHIa
| Eventc |
Relative Risk
CE/MPA vs placebo
at 5.2 Years
(95% CI*) |
Placebo
n = 8102 |
CE/MPA
n = 8506 |
| Absolute Risk per 10,000 Women-years |
| CHD events |
1.29 (1.02-1.63) |
30 |
37 |
| Non-fatal MI |
1.32 (1.02-1.72) |
23 |
30 |
| CHD death |
1.18 (0.70-1.97) |
6 |
7 |
| Invasive breast cancerb |
1.26 (1.00-1.59) |
30 |
38 |
| Stroke |
1.41 (1.07-1.85) |
21 |
29 |
| Pulmonary embolism |
2.13 (1.39-3.25) |
8 |
16 |
| Colorectal cancer |
0.63 (0.43-0.92) |
16 |
10 |
| Endometrial cancer |
0.83 (0.47-1.47) |
6 |
5 |
| Hip fracture |
0.66 (0.45-0.98) |
15 |
10 |
| Death due to causes other than the events above |
0.92 (0.74-1.14) |
40 |
37 |
| Global Indexc |
1.15 (1.03-1.28) |
151 |
170 |
| Deep vein thrombosisd |
2.07 (1.49-2.87) |
13 |
26 |
| Vertebral fracturesd |
0.66 (0.44-0.98) |
15 |
9 |
| Other osteoporotic fracturesd |
0.77 (0.69-0.86) |
170 |
131 |
a adapted from JAMA, 2002; 288:321-333
b includes metastatic and non-metastatic breast cancer with
the exception of in situ breast cancer
c a subset of the events was combined in a “global index”,
defined as the earliest occurrence of CHD events, invasive breast cancer,
stroke, pulmonary embolism, endometrial cancer, colorectal cancer, hip
fracture, or death due to other causes
d not included in Global Index
* nominal confidence intervals unadjusted for multiple looks and multiple
comparisons |
For those outcomes included in the “global index,” the absolute
excess risks per 10,000 women-years in the group treated with CE/MPA were 7
more CHD events, 8 more strokes, 8 more PEs, and 8 more invasive breast cancers,
while the absolute risk reductions per 10,000 women-years were 6 fewer colorectal
cancers and 5 fewer hip fractures. The absolute excess risk of events included
in the “global index” was 19 per 10,000 women-years. There was no
difference between the groups in terms of all-cause mortality. (See BOXED
WARNINGS, WARNINGS, and PRECAUTIONS.)
Women's Health Initiative Memory Study
The Women's Health Initiative Memory Study (WHIMS), a substudy of WHI, enrolled
4,532 predominantly healthy postmenopausal women 65 years of age and older (47%
were age 65 to 69 years, 35% were 70 to 74 years, and 18% were 75 years of age
and older) to evaluate the effects of CE/MPA (0.625 mg conjugated estrogens
plus 2.5 mg medroxyprogesterone acetate) on the incidence of probable dementia
(primary outcome) compared with placebo.
After an average follow-up of 4 years, 40 women in the estrogen/progestin group
(45 per 10,000 women-years) and 21 in the placebo group (22 per 10,000 women-years)
were diagnosed with probable dementia. The relative risk of probable dementia
in the hormone therapy group was 2.05 (95% CI, 1.21 to 3.48) compared to placebo.
Differences between groups became apparent in the first year of treatment. It
is unknown whether these findings apply to younger postmenopausal women. (See
BOXED WARNING and WARNINGS,
Dementia.)
Last updated on RxList: 1/23/2009