Gemzar has been used in a wide variety of malignancies, both as a single-agent
and in combination with other cytotoxic drugs.
Single-Agent Use: Myelosuppression is the principal dose-limiting toxicity
with Gemzar therapy. Dosage adjustments for hematologic toxicity are frequently
needed and are described in DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION.
The data in Table 7 are based on 979 patients receiving Gemzar as a single-agent
administered weekly as a 30-minute infusion for treatment of a wide variety
of malignancies. The Gemzar starting doses ranged from 800 to 1250 mg/m2.
Data are also shown for the subset of patients with pancreatic cancer treated
in 5 clinical studies. The frequency of all grades and severe (WHO Grade 3 or
4) adverse events were generally similar in the single-agent safety database
of 979 patients and the subset of patients with pancreatic cancer. Adverse reactions
reported in the single-agent safety database resulted in discontinuation of
Gemzar therapy in about 10% of patients. In the comparative trial in pancreatic
cancer, the discontinuation rate for adverse reactions was 14.3% for the Gemzar
arm and 4.8% for the 5-FU arm.
All WHO-graded laboratory events are listed in Table 7, regardless of causality.
Non-laboratory adverse events listed in Table 7 or discussed below were those
reported, regardless of causality, for at least 10% of all patients, except
the categories of Extravasation, Allergic, and Cardiovascular and certain specific
events under the Renal, Pulmonary, and Infection categories. Table 8 presents
the data from the comparative trial of Gemzar and 5-FU in pancreatic cancer
for the same adverse events as those in Table 7, regardless of incidence.
Table 7: Selected WHO-Graded Adverse Events in Patients Receiving
Single-Agent Gemzar WHO Grades (% incidence)*
| |
All Patientsa |
Pancreatic Cancer Patientsb |
|
Discontinuations (%)c |
| |
All Grades |
Grade 3 |
Grade 4 |
All Grades |
Grade 3 |
Grade 4 |
All Patients |
| Laboratoryd |
| Hematologic |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Anemia |
68 |
7 |
1 |
73 |
8 |
2 |
< 1 |
| Leukopenia |
62 |
9 |
< 1 |
64 |
8 |
1 |
< 1 |
| Neutropenia |
63 |
19 |
6 |
61 |
17 |
7 |
- |
| Thrombocytopenia |
24 |
4 |
1 |
36 |
7 |
< 1 |
< 1 |
| Hepatic |
|
|
|
|
|
|
< 1 |
| ALT |
68 |
8 |
2 |
72 |
10 |
1 |
|
| AST |
67 |
6 |
2 |
78 |
12 |
5 |
|
| Alkaline Phosphatase |
55 |
7 |
2 |
77 |
16 |
4 |
|
| Bilirubin |
13 |
2 |
< 1 |
26 |
6 |
2 |
|
| Renal |
|
|
|
|
|
|
< 1 |
| Proteinuria |
45 |
< 1 |
0 |
32 |
< 1 |
0 |
|
| Hematuria |
35 |
< 1 |
0 |
23 |
0 |
0 |
|
| BUN |
16 |
0 |
0 |
15 |
0 |
0 |
|
| Creatinine |
8 |
< 1 |
0 |
6 |
0 |
0 |
|
| Non-laboratorye |
| Nausea and Vomiting |
69 |
13 |
1 |
71 |
10 |
2 |
< 1 |
| Pain |
48 |
9 |
< 1 |
42 |
6 |
< 1 |
< 1 |
| Fever |
41 |
2 |
0 |
38 |
2 |
0 |
< 1 |
| Rash |
30 |
< 1 |
0 |
28 |
< 1 |
0 |
< 1 |
| Dyspnea |
23 |
3 |
< 1 |
10 |
0 |
< 1 |
< 1 |
| Constipation |
23 |
1 |
< 1 |
31 |
3 |
< 1 |
0 |
| Diarrhea |
19 |
1 |
0 |
30 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
| Hemorrhage |
17 |
< 1 |
< 1 |
4 |
2 |
< 1 |
< 1 |
| Infection |
16 |
1 |
< 1 |
10 |
2 |
< 1 |
< 1 |
| Alopecia |
15 |
< 1 |
0 |
16 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| Stomatitis |
11 |
< 1 |
0 |
10 |
< 1 |
0 |
< 1 |
| Somnolence |
11 |
< 1 |
< 1 |
11 |
2 |
< 1 |
< 1 |
| Paresthesias |
10 |
< 1 |
0 |
10 |
< 1 |
0 |
0 |
* Grade based on criteria from the World
Health Organization (WHO).
a N=699-974; all patients with laboratory or non-laboratory
data.
b N=161-241; all pancreatic cancer patients with laboratory
or non-laboratory data.
c N=979.
d Regardless of causality.
e Table includes non-laboratory data with incidence for all
patients ≥ 10%. For approximately 60% of the patients, non-laboratory
events were graded only if assessed to be possibly drug-related. |
Table 8: Selected WHO-Graded Adverse Events From Comparative
Trial of Gemzar and 5-FU in Pancreatic Cancer WHO Grades (% incidence)*
| |
Gemzara |
5-FUb |
| |
All Grades |
Grade3 |
Grade 4 |
All Grades |
Grade 3 |
Grade 4 |
| Laboratoryc |
| Hematologic |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Anemia |
65 |
7 |
3 |
45 |
0 |
0 |
| Leukopenia |
71 |
10 |
0 |
15 |
2 |
0 |
| Neutropenia |
62 |
19 |
7 |
18 |
2 |
3 |
| Thrombocytopenia |
47 |
10 |
0 |
15 |
2 |
0 |
| Hepatic |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ALT |
72 |
8 |
2 |
38 |
0 |
0 |
| AST |
72 |
10 |
2 |
52 |
2 |
0 |
| Alkaline Phosphatase |
71 |
16 |
0 |
64 |
10 |
3 |
| Bilirubin |
16 |
2 |
2 |
25 |
6 |
3 |
| Renal |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Proteinuria |
10 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
| Hematuria |
13 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| BUN |
8 |
0 |
0 |
10 |
0 |
0 |
| Creatinine |
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| Non-laboratoryd |
| Nausea and Vomiting |
64 |
10 |
3 |
58 |
5 |
0 |
| Pain |
10 |
2 |
0 |
7 |
0 |
0 |
| Fever |
30 |
0 |
0 |
16 |
0 |
0 |
| Rash |
24 |
0 |
0 |
13 |
0 |
0 |
| Dyspnea |
6 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
| Constipation |
10 |
3 |
0 |
11 |
2 |
0 |
| Diarrhea |
24 |
2 |
0 |
31 |
5 |
0 |
| Hemorrhage |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
| Infection |
8 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
2 |
0 |
| Alopecia |
18 |
0 |
0 |
16 |
0 |
0 |
| Stomatitis |
14 |
0 |
0 |
15 |
0 |
0 |
| Somnolence |
5 |
2 |
0 |
7 |
2 |
0 |
| Paresthesias |
2 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
* Grade based on criteria from the World
Health Organization (WHO).
a N=58-63; all Gemzar patients with laboratory or non-laboratory
data.
b N=61-63; all 5-FU patients with laboratory or non-laboratory
data.
c Regardless of causality.
d Non-laboratory events were graded only if assessed to be
possibly drug-related. |
Hematologic - In studies in pancreatic cancer myelosuppression
is the dose-limiting toxicity with Gemzar, but < 1% of patients discontinued
therapy for either anemia, leukopenia, or thrombocytopenia. Red blood cell transfusions
were required by 19% of patients. The incidence of sepsis was less than 1%.
Petechiae or mild blood loss (hemorrhage), from any cause, was reported in 16%
of patients; less than 1% of patients required platelet transfusions. Patients
should be monitored for myelosuppression during Gemzar therapy and dosage modified
or suspended according to the degree of hematologic toxicity (see DOSAGE
AND ADMINISTRATION).
Gastrointestinal - Nausea and vomiting were commonly reported
(69%) but were usually of mild to moderate severity. Severe nausea and vomiting
(WHO Grade 3/4) occurred in < 15% of patients. Diarrhea was reported by 19%
of patients, and stomatitis by 11% of patients.
Hepatic - In clinical trials, Gemzar was associated with transient
elevations of one or both serum transaminases in approximately 70% of patients,
but there was no evidence of increasing hepatic toxicity with either longer
duration of exposure to Gemzar or with greater total cumulative dose. Serious
hepatotoxicity, including liver failure and death, has been reported very rarely
in patients receiving Gemzar alone or in combination with other potentially
hepatotoxic drugs (see Hepatic under Post-marketing experience).
Renal - In clinical trials, mild proteinuria and hematuria were
commonly reported. Clinical findings consistent with the Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome
(HUS) were reported in 6 of 2429 patients (0.25%) receiving Gemzar in clinical
trials. Four patients developed HUS on Gemzar therapy, 2 immediately posttherapy.
The diagnosis of HUS should be considered if the patient develops anemia with
evidence of microangiopathic hemolysis, elevation of bilirubin or LDH, reticulocytosis,
severe thrombocytopenia, and/or evidence of renal failure (elevation of serum
creatinine or BUN). Gemzar therapy should be discontinued immediately. Renal
failure may not be reversible even with discontinuation of therapy and dialysis
may be required (see Renal under Post-marketing experience).
Fever - The overall incidence of fever was 41%. This is in contrast
to the incidence of infection (16%) and indicates that Gemzar may cause fever
in the absence of clinical infection. Fever was frequently associated with other
flu-like symptoms and was usually mild and clinically manageable.
Rash - Rash was reported in 30% of patients. The rash was typically
a macular or finely granular maculopapular pruritic eruption of mild to moderate
severity involving the trunk and extremities. Pruritus was reported for 13%
of patients.
Pulmonary - In clinical trials, dyspnea, unrelated to underlying
disease, has been reported in association with Gemzar therapy. Dyspnea was occasionally
accompanied by bronchospasm. Pulmonary toxicity has been reported with the use
of Gemzar (see Pulmonary under Post-marketing experience). The
etiology of these effects is unknown. If such effects develop, Gemzar should
be discontinued. Early use of supportive care measures may help ameliorate these
conditions.
Edema - Edema (13%), peripheral edema (20%), and generalized
edema ( < 1%) were reported. Less than 1% of patients discontinued due to edema.
Flu-like Symptoms - "Flu syndrome" was reported for
19% of patients. Individual symptoms of fever, asthenia, anorexia, headache,
cough, chills, and myalgia were commonly reported. Fever and asthenia were also
reported frequently as isolated symptoms. Insomnia, rhinitis, sweating, and
malaise were reported infrequently. Less than 1% of patients discontinued due
to flu-like symptoms.
Infection - Infections were reported for 16% of patients. Sepsis
was rarely reported ( < 1%).
Alopecia - Hair loss, usually minimal, was reported by 15% of
patients.
Neurotoxicity - There was a 10% incidence of mild paresthesias
and a < 1% rate of severe paresthesias.
Extravasation - Injection-site related events were reported for
4% of patients. There were no reports of injection site necrosis. Gemzar is
not a vesicant.
Allergic - Bronchospasm was reported for less than 2% of patients.
Anaphylactoid reaction has been reported rarely. Gemzar should not be administered
to patients with a known hypersensitivity to this drug (see CONTRAINDICATION).
Cardiovascular - During clinical trials, 2% of patients discontinued
therapy with Gemzar due to cardiovascular events such as myocardial infarction,
cerebrovascular accident, arrhythmia, and hypertension. Many of these patients
had a prior history of cardiovascular disease (see Cardiovascular under Post-marketing
experience).
Combination Use in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: In the Gemzar plus cisplatin
versus cisplatin study, dose adjustments occurred with 35% of Gemzar injections
and 17% of cisplatin injections on the combination arm, versus 6% on the cisplatin-only
arm. Dose adjustments were required in greater than 90% of patients on the combination,
versus 16% on cisplatin. Study discontinuations for possibly drug-related adverse
events occurred in 15% of patients on the combination arm and 8% of patients
on the cisplatin arm. With a median of 4 cycles of Gemzar plus cisplatin treatment,
94 of 262 patients (36%) experienced a total of 149 hospitalizations due to
possibly treatment-related adverse events. With a median of 2 cycles of cisplatin
treatment, 61 of 260 patients (23%) experienced 78 hospitalizations due to possibly
treatment-related adverse events.
In the Gemzar plus cisplatin versus etoposide plus cisplatin study, dose adjustments
occurred with 20% of Gemzar injections and 16% of cisplatin injections in the
Gemzar plus cisplatin arm compared with 20% of etoposide injections and 15%
of cisplatin injections in the etoposide plus cisplatin arm. With a median of
5 cycles of Gemzar plus cisplatin treatment, 15 of 69 patients (22%) experienced
15 hospitalizations due to possibly treatment-related adverse events. With a
median of 4 cycles of etoposide plus cisplatin treatment, 18 of 66 patients
(27%) experienced 22 hospitalizations due to possibly treatment-related adverse
events. In patients who completed more than one cycle, dose adjustments were
reported in 81% of the Gemzar plus cisplatin patients, compared with 68% on
the etoposide plus cisplatin arm. Study discontinuations for possibly drug-related
adverse events occurred in 14% of patients on the Gemzar plus cisplatin arm
and in 8% of patients on the etoposide plus cisplatin arm. The incidence of
myelosuppression was increased in frequency with Gemzar plus cisplatin treatment
(~90%) compared to that with the Gemzar monotherapy (~60%). With combination
therapy Gemzar dosage adjustments for hematologic toxicity were required more
often while cisplatin dose adjustments were less frequently required.
Table 9 presents the safety data from the Gemzar plus cisplatin versus cisplatin
study in non-small cell lung cancer. The NCI Common Toxicity Criteria (CTC)
were used. The two-drug combination was more myelosuppressive with 4 (1.5%)
possibly treatment-related deaths, including 3 resulting from myelosuppression
with infection and one case of renal failure associated with pancytopenia and
infection. No deaths due to treatment were reported on the cisplatin arm. Nine
cases of febrile neutropenia were reported on the combination therapy arm compared
to 2 on the cisplatin arm. More patients required RBC and platelet transfusions
on the Gemzar plus cisplatin arm.
Myelosuppression occurred more frequently on the combination arm, and in 4
possibly treatment-related deaths myelosuppression was observed. Sepsis was
reported in 4% of patients on the Gemzar plus cisplatin arm compared to 1% on
the cisplatin arm. Platelet transfusions were required in 21% of patients on
the combination arm and < 1% of patients on the cisplatin arm.
Hemorrhagic events occurred in 14% of patients on the combination arm and 4%
on the cisplatin arm. However, severe hemorrhagic events were rare. Red blood
cell transfusions were required in 39% of the patients on the Gemzar plus cisplatin
arm, versus 13% on the cisplatin arm. The data suggest cumulative anemia with
continued Gemzar plus cisplatin use.
Nausea and vomiting despite the use of antiemetics occurred slightly more often
with Gemzar plus cisplatin therapy (78%) than with cisplatin alone (71%). In
studies with single-agent Gemzar, a lower incidence of nausea and vomiting (58%
to 69%) was reported. Renal function abnormalities, hypomagnesemia, neuromotor,
neurocortical, and neurocerebellar toxicity occurred more often with Gemzar
plus cisplatin than with cisplatin monotherapy. Neurohearing toxicity was similar
on both arms.
Cardiac dysrrhythmias of Grade 3 or greater were reported in 7 (3%) patients
treated with Gemzar plus cisplatin compared to one ( < 1%) Grade 3 dysrrhythmia
reported with cisplatin therapy. Hypomagnesemia and hypokalemia were associated
with one Grade 4 arrhythmia on the Gemzar plus cisplatin combination arm.
Table 10 presents data from the randomized study of Gemzar plus cisplatin versus
etoposide plus cisplatin in 135 patients with NSCLC for the same WHO-graded
adverse events as those in Table 8. One death (1.5%) was reported on the Gemzar
plus cisplatin arm due to febrile neutropenia associated with renal failure
which was possibly treatment-related. No deaths related to treatment occurred
on the etoposide plus cisplatin arm. The overall incidence of Grade 4 neutropenia
on the Gemzar plus cisplatin arm was less than on the etoposide plus cisplatin
arm (28% versus 56%). Sepsis was experienced by 2% of patients on both treatment
arms. Grade 3 anemia and Grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia were more common on the
Gemzar plus cisplatin arm. RBC transfusions were given to 29% of the patients
who received Gemzar plus cisplatin versus 21% of patients who received etoposide
plus cisplatin. Platelet transfusions were given to 3% of the patients who received
Gemzar plus cisplatin versus 8% of patients who received etoposide plus cisplatin.
Grade 3/4 nausea and vomiting were also more common on the Gemzar plus cisplatin
arm. On the Gemzar plus cisplatin arm, 7% of participants were hospitalized
due to febrile neutropenia compared to 12% on the etoposide plus cisplatin arm.
More than twice as many patients had dose reductions or omissions of a scheduled
dose of Gemzar as compared to etoposide, which may explain the differences in
the incidence of neutropenia and febrile neutropenia between treatment arms.
Flu syndrome was reported by 3% of patients on the Gemzar plus cisplatin arm
with none reported on the comparator arm. Eight patients (12%) on the Gemzar
plus cisplatin arm reported edema compared to one patient (2%) on the etoposide
plus cisplatin arm.
Table 9: Selected CTC-Graded Adverse Events From Comparative
Trial of Gemzar Plus Cisplatin Versus Single-Agent Cisplatin in NSCLC CTC Grades
(% incidence)*
| |
Gemzar plus Cisplatina |
Cisplatinb |
| All Grades |
Grade 3 |
Grade 4 |
All Grades |
Grade 3 |
Grade 4 |
| Laboratoryc |
| Hematologic |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Anemia |
89 |
22 |
3 |
67 |
6 |
1 |
| RBC Transfusiond |
39 |
|
|
13 |
|
|
| Leukopenia |
82 |
35 |
11 |
25 |
2 |
1 |
| Neutropenia |
79 |
22 |
35 |
20 |
3 |
1 |
| Thrombocytopenia |
85 |
25 |
25 |
13 |
3 |
1 |
| Platelet Transfusionsd |
21 |
|
|
< 1 |
|
|
| Lymphocytes |
75 |
25 |
18 |
51 |
12 |
5 |
| Hepatic |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Transaminase |
22 |
2 |
1 |
10 |
1 |
0 |
| Alkaline Phosphatase |
19 |
1 |
0 |
13 |
0 |
0 |
| Renal |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Proteinuria |
23 |
0 |
0 |
18 |
0 |
0 |
| Hematuria |
15 |
0 |
0 |
13 |
0 |
0 |
| Creatinine |
38 |
4 |
< 1 |
31 |
2 |
< 1 |
| Other Laboratory |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Hyperglycemia |
30 |
4 |
0 |
23 |
3 |
0 |
| Hypomagnesemia |
30 |
4 |
3 |
17 |
2 |
0 |
| Hypocalcemia |
18 |
2 |
0 |
7 |
0 |
< 1 |
| Non-laboratorye |
| Nausea |
93 |
25 |
2 |
87 |
20 |
< 1 |
| Vomiting |
78 |
11 |
12 |
71 |
10 |
9 |
| Alopecia |
53 |
1 |
0 |
33 |
0 |
0 |
| Neuro Motor |
35 |
12 |
0 |
15 |
3 |
0 |
| Constipation |
28 |
3 |
0 |
21 |
0 |
0 |
| Neuro Hearing |
25 |
6 |
0 |
21 |
6 |
0 |
| Diarrhea |
24 |
2 |
2 |
13 |
0 |
0 |
| Neuro Sensory |
23 |
1 |
0 |
18 |
1 |
0 |
| Infection |
18 |
3 |
2 |
12 |
1 |
0 |
| Fever |
16 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
| Neuro Cortical |
16 |
3 |
1 |
9 |
1 |
0 |
| Neuro Mood |
16 |
1 |
0 |
10 |
1 |
0 |
| Local |
15 |
0 |
0 |
6 |
0 |
0 |
| Neuro Headache |
14 |
0 |
0 |
7 |
0 |
0 |
| Stomatitis |
14 |
1 |
0 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
| Hemorrhage |
14 |
1 |
0 |
4 |
0 |
0 |
| Dyspnea |
12 |
4 |
3 |
11 |
3 |
2 |
| Hypotension |
12 |
1 |
0 |
7 |
1 |
0 |
| Rash |
11 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
* Grade based on Common Toxicity Criteria
(CTC). Table includes data for adverse events with incidence ≥ 10%
in either arm.
a N=217-253; all Gemzar plus cisplatin patients with laboratory
or non-laboratory data. Gemzar at 1000 mg/m2 on Days 1, 8,
and 15 and cisplatin at 100 mg/m2 on Day 1 every 28 days.
b N=213-248; all cisplatin patients with laboratory or non-laboratory
data. Cisplatin at 100 mg/m2 on Day 1 every 28 days.
c Regardless of causality.
d Percent of patients receiving transfusions. Percent transfusions
are not CTC-graded events.
e Non-laboratory events were graded only if assessed to be
possibly drug-related. |
Table 10: Selected WHO-Graded Adverse Events From Comparative
Trial of Gemzar Plus Cisplatin Versus Etoposide Plus Cisplatin in NSCLC WHO
Grades (% incidence)*
| |
Gemzar plus Cisplatina |
Etoposide plus Cisplatinb |
| All Grades |
Grade 3 |
Grade 4 |
All Grades |
Grade 3 |
Grade4 |
| Laboratoryc |
| Hematologic |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Anemia |
88 |
22 |
0 |
77 |
13 |
2 |
| RBC Transfusionsd |
29 |
|
|
21 |
|
|
| Leukopenia |
86 |
26 |
3 |
87 |
36 |
7 |
| Neutropenia |
88 |
36 |
28 |
87 |
20 |
56 |
| Thrombocytopenia |
81 |
39 |
16 |
45 |
8 |
5 |
| Platelet Transfusionsd |
3 |
|
|
8 |
|
|
| Hepatic |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ALT |
6 |
0 |
0 |
12 |
0 |
0 |
| AST |
3 |
0 |
0 |
11 |
0 |
0 |
| Alkaline Phosphatase |
16 |
0 |
0 |
11 |
0 |
0 |
| Bilirubin |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| Renal |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Proteinuria |
12 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
| Hematuria |
22 |
0 |
0 |
10 |
0 |
0 |
| BUN |
6 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
0 |
0 |
| Creatinine |
2 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
| Non-laboratorye,f |
| Nausea and Vomiting |
96 |
35 |
4 |
86 |
19 |
7 |
| Fever |
6 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
| Rash |
10 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
| Dyspnea |
1 |
0 |
1 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
| Constipation |
17 |
0 |
0 |
15 |
0 |
0 |
| Diarrhea |
14 |
1 |
1 |
13 |
0 |
2 |
| Hemorrhage |
9 |
0 |
3 |
3 |
0 |
3 |
| Infection |
28 |
3 |
1 |
21 |
8 |
0 |
| Alopecia |
77 |
13 |
0 |
92 |
51 |
0 |
| Stomatitis |
20 |
4 |
0 |
18 |
2 |
0 |
| Somnolence |
3 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
2 |
0 |
| Paresthesias |
38 |
0 |
0 |
16 |
2 |
0 |
* Grade based on criteria from the World
Health Organization (WHO).
a N=67-69; all Gemzar plus cisplatin patients with laboratory
or non-laboratory data. Gemzar at 1250 mg/m2 on Days 1 and
8 and cisplatin at 100 mg/m2 on Day 1 every 21 days.
b N=57-63; all cisplatin plus etoposide patients with laboratory
or non-laboratory data. Cisplatin at 100 mg/m2 on Day 1 and
IV etoposide at 100 mg/m2 on Days 1, 2, and 3 every 21 days.
c Regardless of causality.
d Percent of patients receiving transfusions. Percent transfusions
are not WHO-graded events.
e Non-laboratory events were graded only if assessed to be
possibly drug-related. f Pain data were not collected. |
Combination Use in Breast Cancer: In the Gemzar plus paclitaxel versus
paclitaxel study, dose reductions occurred with 8% of Gemzar injections and
5% of paclitaxel injections on the combination arm, versus 2% on the paclitaxel
arm. On the combination arm, 7% of Gemzar doses were omitted and < 1% of paclitaxel
doses were omitted, compared to < 1% of paclitaxel doses on the paclitaxel
arm. A total of 18 patients (7%) on the Gemzar plus paclitaxel arm and 12 (5%)
on the paclitaxel arm discontinued the study because of adverse events. There
were two deaths on study or within 30 days after study drug discontinuation
that were possibly drug-related, one on each arm.
Table 11 presents the safety data occurrences of ≥ 10% (all grades) from the
Gemzar plus paclitaxel versus paclitaxel study in breast cancer.
Table 11: Adverse Events From Comparative Trial of Gemzar
Plus Paclitaxel Versus Single-Agent Paclitaxel in Breast Cancera
CTC Grades (% incidence)
| |
Gemzar plus Paclitaxel
(N=262) |
Paclitaxel
(N=259) |
| All Grades |
Grade 3 |
Grade 4 |
All Grades |
Grade 3 |
Grade 4 |
| Laboratoryb |
| Hematologic |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Anemia |
69 |
6 |
1 |
51 |
3 |
< 1 |
| Neutropenia |
69 |
31 |
17 |
31 |
4 |
7 |
| Thrombocytopenia |
26 |
5 |
< 1 |
7 |
< 1 |
< 1 |
| Leukopenia |
21 |
10 |
1 |
12 |
2 |
0 |
| Hepatobiliary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ALT |
18 |
5 |
< 1 |
6 |
< 1 |
0 |
| AST |
16 |
2 |
0 |
5 |
< 1 |
0 |
| Non-laboratoryc |
| Alopecia |
90 |
14 |
4 |
92 |
19 |
3 |
| Neuropathy-sensory |
64 |
5 |
< 1 |
58 |
3 |
0 |
| Nausea |
50 |
1 |
0 |
31 |
2 |
0 |
| Fatigue |
40 |
6 |
< 1 |
28 |
1 |
< 1 |
| Myalgia |
33 |
4 |
0 |
33 |
3 |
< 1 |
| Vomiting |
29 |
2 |
0 |
15 |
2 |
0 |
| Arthralgia |
24 |
3 |
0 |
22 |
2 |
< 1 |
| Diarrhea |
20 |
3 |
0 |
13 |
2 |
0 |
| Anorexia |
17 |
0 |
0 |
12 |
< 1 |
0 |
| Neuropathy-motor |
15 |
2 |
< 1 |
10 |
< 1 |
0 |
| Stomatitis/pharyngitis |
13 |
1 |
< 1 |
8 |
< 1 |
0 |
| Fever |
13 |
< 1 |
0 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
| Constipation |
11 |
< 1 |
0 |
12 |
0 |
0 |
| Bone pain |
11 |
2 |
0 |
10 |
< 1 |
0 |
| Pain-other |
11 |
< 1 |
0 |
8 |
< 1 |
0 |
| Rash/desquamation |
11 |
< 1 |
< 1 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
a Grade based on Common Toxicity
Criteria (CTC) Version 2.0 (all grades ≥ 10%).
b Regardless of causality.
c Non-laboratory events were graded only if assessed to be
possibly drug-related. |
The following are the clinically relevant adverse events that occurred in > 1%
and < 10% (all grades) of patients on either arm. In parentheses are the incidences
of Grade 3 and 4 adverse events (Gemzar plus paclitaxel versus paclitaxel):
febrile neutropenia (5.0% versus 1.2%), infection (0.8% versus 0.8%), dyspnea
(1.9% versus 0), and allergic reaction/hypersensitivity (0 versus 0.8%).
No differences in the incidence of laboratory and non-laboratory events were
observed in patients 65 years or older, as compared to patients younger than
65.
Combination Use in Ovarian Cancer: In the Gemzar plus carboplatin versus
carboplatin study, dose reductions occurred with 10.4% of Gemzar injections
and 1.8% of carboplatin injections on the combination arm, versus 3.8% on the
carboplatin alone arm. On the combination arm, 13.7% of Gemzar doses were omitted
and 0.2% of carboplatin doses were omitted, compared to 0% of carboplatin doses
on the carboplatin alone arm. There were no differences in discontinuations
due to adverse events between arms (10.9% versus 9.8%, respectively).
Table 12 presents the adverse events (all grades) occurring in 10% of patients
in the ovarian cancer study.
Table 12: Adverse Events From Comparative Trial of Gemzar
Plus Carboplatin Versus Single-Agent Carboplatin in Ovarian Cancera
CTC Grades (% incidence)
| |
Gemzar plus Carboplatin
(N=175) |
Carboplatin
(N=174) |
| |
All Grades |
Grade 3 |
Grade 4 |
All Grades |
Grade 3 |
Grade 4 |
| Laboratoryb |
| Hematologic |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Neutropenia |
90 |
42 |
29 |
58 |
11 |
1 |
| Anemia |
86 |
22 |
6 |
75 |
9 |
2 |
| Leukopenia |
86 |
48 |
5 |
70 |
6 |
< 1 |
| Thrombocytopenia |
78 |
30 |
5 |
57 |
10 |
1 |
| RBC Transfusionsc |
38 |
|
|
15 |
|
|
| Platelet Transfusionsc |
9 |
|
|
3 |
|
|
| Non-laboratoryb |
| Nausea |
69 |
6 |
0 |
61 |
3 |
0 |
| Alopecia |
49 |
0 |
0 |
17 |
0 |
0 |
| Vomiting |
46 |
6 |
0 |
36 |
2 |
< 1 |
| Constipation |
42 |
6 |
1 |
37 |
3 |
0 |
| Fatigue |
40 |
3 |
< 1 |
32 |
5 |
0 |
| Neuropathy-sensory |
29 |
1 |
0 |
27 |
2 |
0 |
| Diarrhea |
25 |
3 |
0 |
14 |
< 1 |
0 |
| Stomatitis/pharyngitis |
22 |
< 1 |
0 |
13 |
0 |
0 |
| Anorexia |
16 |
1 |
0 |
13 |
0 |
0 |
a Grade based on Common Toxicity
Criteria (CTC) Version 2.0 (all grades 10%).
b Regardless of causality.
c Percent of patients receiving transfusions. Transfusions
are not CTC-graded events. Blood transfusions included both packed red
blood cells and whole blood. |
In addition to blood product transfusions as listed in Table 12, myelosuppression
was also managed with hematopoetic agents. These agents were administered more
frequently with combination therapy than with monotherapy (granulocyte growth
factors: 23.6% and 10.1%, respectively; erythropoetic agents: 7.3% and 3.9%,
respectively).
The following are the clinically relevant adverse events, regardless of causality,
that occurred in > 1% and < 10% (all grades) of patients on either arm.
In parentheses are the incidences of Grade 3 and 4 adverse events (Gemzar plus
carboplatin versus carboplatin): AST or ALT elevation (0 versus 1.2%), dyspnea
(3.4% versus 2.9%), febrile neutropenia (1.1% versus 0), hemorrhagic event (2.3%
versus 1.1%), hypersensitivity reaction (2.3% versus 2.9%), motor neuropathy
(1.1% versus 0.6%), and rash/desquamation (0.6% versus 0).
No differences in the incidence of laboratory and non-laboratory events were
observed in patients 65 years or older, as compared to patients younger than
65.
Post-marketing experience: The following adverse events have been identified
during post-approval use of Gemzar. These events have occurred after Gemzar
single-agent use and Gemzar in combination with other cytotoxic agents. Decisions
to include these events are based on the seriousness of the event, frequency
of reporting, or potential causal connection to Gemzar.
Cardiovascular - Congestive heart failure and myocardial infarction
have been reported very rarely with the use of Gemzar. Arrhythmias, predominantly
supraventricular in nature, have been reported very rarely.
Vascular Disorders - Clinical signs of peripheral vasculitis
and gangrene have been reported very rarely.
Skin - Cellulitis and non-serious injection site reactions in
the absence of extravasation have been rarely reported. Severe skin reactions,
including desquamation and bullous skin eruptions, have been reported very rarely.
Hepatic - Increased liver function tests including elevations
in aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), gamma-glutamyl
transferase (GGT), alkaline phosphatase, and bilirubin levels have been reported
rarely. Serious hepatotoxicity including liver failure and death has been reported
very rarely in patients receiving Gemzar alone or in combination with other
potentially hepatotoxic drugs.
Pulmonary - Parenchymal toxicity, including interstitial pneumonitis,
pulmonary fibrosis, pulmonary edema, and adult respiratory distress syndrome
(ARDS), has been reported rarely following one or more doses of Gemzar administered
to patients with various malignancies. Some patients experienced the onset of
pulmonary symptoms up to 2 weeks after the last Gemzar dose. Respiratory failure
and death occurred very rarely in some patients despite discontinuation of therapy.
Renal - Hemolytic-Uremic Syndrome (HUS) and/or renal failure
have been reported following one or more doses of Gemzar. Renal failure leading
to death or requiring dialysis, despite discontinuation of therapy, has been
rarely reported. The majority of the cases of renal failure leading to death
were due to HUS.
Injury Poisoning, and Procedural Complications - Radiation recall
reactions have been reported (see Radiation Therapy under PRECAUTIONS).