(see also BOXED WARNINGS). All Patients: Cyclosporine,
the active ingredient of Gengraf® (cyclosporine oral solution, USP [MODIFIED]),
can cause nephrotoxicity and hepatotoxicity. The risk increases with increasing
doses of cyclosporine. Renal dysfunction including structural kidney damage
is a potential consequence of Gengraf® and therefore renal function must
be monitored during therapy. Care should be taken in using cyclosporine with
nephrotoxic drugs (see PRECAUTIONS).
Patients receiving Gengraf® require frequent monitoring of serum creatinine
(see Special Monitoring under DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION).
Elderly patients should be monitored with particular care, since decreases in
renal function also occur with age. If patients are not properly monitored and
doses are not properly adjusted, cyclosporine therapy can be associated with
the occurrence of structural kidney damage and persistent renal dysfunction.
An increase in serum creatinine and BUN may occur during
Gengraf® therapy and reflect a reduction in the glomerular filtration rate. Impaired renal function at any time
requires close monitoring, and frequent dosage adjustment may be indicated. The frequency and severity of serum creatinine elevations
increase with dose and duration of cyclosporine therapy. These elevations are likely to become more pronounced without dose
reduction or discontinuation.
Because Gengraf® (cyclosporine oral solution, USP
[MODIFIED]) is not bioequivalent to Sandimmune®* (Cyclosporine Oral Solution), conversion from Gengraf® to
Sandimmune®* using a 1:1 ratio (mg/kg/day) may result in lower cyclosporine blood concentrations. Conversion from
Gengraf® to Sandimmune®* should be made with increased monitoring to avoid the potential of underdosing.
Kidney, Liver, and Heart Transplant
Cyclosporine, the
active ingredient of Gengraf® (cyclosporine oral solution, USP [MODIFIED]), can cause nephrotoxicity and hepatotoxicity
when used in high doses. It is not unusual for serum creatinine and BUN levels to be elevated during cyclosporine therapy.
These elevations in renal transplant patients do not necessarily indicate rejection, and each patient must be fully evaluated
before dosage adjustment is initiated.
Based on the historical Sandimmune® experience with oral
solution, nephrotoxicity associated with cyclosporine had been noted in 25% of cases of renal transplantation, 38% of cases
of cardiac transplantation, and 37% of cases of liver transplantation. Mild nephrotoxicity was generally noted 2-3
months after renal transplant and consisted of an arrest in the fall of the pre-operative elevations of BUN and creatinine at a
range of 35-45 mg/dL and 2-2.5 mg/dL respectively. These elevations were often responsive to cyclosporine dosage
reduction.
More overt nephrotoxicity was seen early after
transplantation and was characterized by a rapidly rising BUN and creatinine. Since these events are similar to renal rejection episodes,
care must be taken to differentiate between them. This form of nephrotoxicity is usually responsive to cyclosporine dosage
reduction.
Although specific diagnostic criteria which reliably
differentiate renal graft rejection from drug toxicity have not been found, a number of parameters have been significantly
associated with one or the other. It should be noted however, that up to 20% of patients may have simultaneous nephrotoxicity and
rejection.
Nephrotoxicity vs. Rejection
| Parameter |
Nephrotoxicity |
Rejection |
| History |
Donor > 50 years old or hypotensive
Prolonged kidney preservation
Prolonged anastomosis time
Concomitant nephrotoxic drugs |
Anti-donor immune response
Retransplant patient |
| Clinical |
Often > 6 weeks postopb
Prolonged initial nonfunction
(acute tubular necrosis) |
Often < 4 weeks postopb
Fever > 37.5°C
Weight gain > 0.5 kg
Graft swelling and tenderness
Decrease in daily urine volume > 500 mL (or 50%) |
| Laboratory |
CyA serum trough level > 200 ng/mL
Gradual rise in Cr ( < 0.15 mg/dL/day)a
Cr plateau < 25% above baselineBUN/Cr ≥ 20 |
CyA serum trough level < 150 ng/mL
Rapid rise in Cr ( > 0.3 mg/dL/day)a
Cr > 25% above baseline
BUN/Cr < 20 |
| Biopsy |
Arteriolopathy (medial hypertrophya, hyalinosis, nodular deposits, intimal thickening, endothelial vacuolization, progressive scarring) |
Endovasculitisc (proliferationa, intimal arteritisb, necrosis, sclerosis) |
Tubular atrophy, isometric vacuolization, isolated calcifications
Minimal edema
Mild focal infiltratesc
Diffuse interstitial fibrosis, often striped form |
Tubulitis with RBCb and WBCb casts, some irregular vacuolization
Interstitial edemac and hemorrhageb
Diffuse moderate to severe mononuclear infiltratesd
Glomerulitis (mononuclear cells)c |
Aspiration
Cytology |
CyA deposits in tubular and endothelial cells
Fine isometric vacuolization of tubular cells |
Inflammatory infiltrate with mononuclear phagocytes, macrophages, lymphoblastoid cells, and activated T-cells These strongly express HLA-DR antigens |
| Urine Cytology |
Tubular cells with vacuolization and granularization |
Degenerative tubular cells, plasma cells, and lymphocyturia > 20% of sediment |
Manometry
Ultrasonography |
Intracapsular pressure < 40 mm Hgb
Unchanged graft cross sectional area |
Intracapsular pressure > 40 mm Hgb Increase in graft cross sectional area AP diameter ≥ Transverse diameter |
Magnetic
Resonance Imagery |
Normal appearance |
Loss of distinct corticomedullary junction, swelling image intensity of parachyma approaching that of psoas, loss of hilar fat |
| Radionuclide Scan |
Normal or generally decreased perfusion |
Patchy arterial flow |
Decrease in tubular function
(131 I-hippuran) > decrease in perfusion (99m Tc DTPA) |
Decrease in perfusion > decrease in tubular function Increased uptake of Indium 111 labeled platelets or Tc-99m in colloid |
| Therapy |
Responds to decreased cyclosporine |
Responds to increased steroids or antilymphocyte globulin |
ap < 0.05,
bp < 0.01,
c p < 0.001,
dp < 0.0001 |
A form of a cyclosporine-associated nephropathy is
characterized by serial deterioration in renal function and morphologic changes in the kidneys. From 5% to 15% of transplant
recipients who have received cyclosporine will fail to show a reduction in rising serum creatinine despite a decrease or
discontinuation of cyclosporine therapy. Renal biopsies from these patients
will demonstrate one or several of the following alterations:
tubular vacuolization, tubular microcalcifications, peritubular capillary congestion, arteriolopathy, and a striped form of
interstitial fibrosis with tubular atrophy. Though none of these morphologic changes is entirely specific, a diagnosis of
cyclosporine-associated structural nephrotoxicity requires evidence of these
findings.
When considering the development of cyclosporine-associated
nephropathy, it is noteworthy that several authors have reported an association between the appearance of
interstitial fibrosis and higher cumulative doses or persistently high circulating trough levels of cyclosporine. This is
particularly true during the first 6 post-transplant months when the dosage tends to be highest and when, in kidney recipients, the
organ appears to be most vulnerable to the toxic effects of cyclosporine. Among other contributing factors to the development of
interstitial fibrosis in these patients are prolonged perfusion time, warm ischemia time, as well as episodes of acute toxicity,
and acute and chronic rejection. The reversibility of interstitial fibrosis and its correlation to renal function have not yet
been determined. Reversibility of arteriolopathy has been reported after stopping cyclosporine or lowering the dosage.
Impaired renal function at any time requires close
monitoring, and frequent dosage adjustment may be indicated.
In the event of severe and unremitting rejection, when
rescue therapy with pulse steroids and monoclonal antibodies fail to reverse the rejection episode, it may be preferable to
switch to alternative immunosuppressive therapy rather than increase the Gengraf® dose to excessive levels.
Occasionally patients have developed a syndrome of
thrombocytopenia and microangiopathic hemolytic anemia which may result in graft failure. The vasculopathy can occur in the
absence of rejection and is accompanied by avid platelet consumption within the graft as demonstrated by Indium 111 labeled
platelet studies. Neither the pathogenesis nor the management of this syndrome is clear. Though resolution has occurred after
reduction or discontinuation of cyclosporine and 1) administration of streptokinase and heparin or 2) plasmapheresis, this appears
to depend upon early detection with Indium 111 labeled platelet scans (see ADVERSE REACTIONS).
Significant hyperkalemia (sometimes associated with
hyperchloremic metabolic acidosis) and hyperuricemia have been seen occasionally in individual patients.
Hepatotoxicity associated with cyclosporine use had been
noted in 4% of cases of renal transplantation, 7% of cases of cardiac transplantation, and 4% of cases of liver
transplantation. This was usually noted during the first month of therapy when high doses of cyclosporine were used and consisted of
elevations of hepatic enzymes and bilirubin. The chemistry elevations usually decreased with a reduction in dosage.
As in patients receiving other immunosuppressants, those
patients receiving cyclosporine are at increased risk for development of lymphomas and other malignancies,
particularly those of the skin. The increased risk appears related to the intensity and duration of immunosuppression rather than to
the use of specific agents. Because of the danger of oversuppression of the immune system resulting in increased
risk of infection or malignancy, a treatment regimen containing multiple immunosuppressants should be used with caution.
There have been reports of convulsions in adult and
pediatric patients receiving cyclosporine, particularly in combination with high dose methylprednisolone.
Encephalopathy has been described both in postmarketing
reports and in the literature. Manifestations include impaired consciousness, convulsions, visual disturbances (including
blindness), loss of motor function, movement disorders and psychiatric disturbances. In many cases, changes in the
white matter have been detected using imaging techniques and pathologic specimens. Predisposing factors such as
hypertension, hypomagnesemia, hypocholesterolemia, high-dose corticosteroids, high cyclosporine blood concentrations, and
graft-versus-host disease have been noted in many but not all of the reported cases. The changes in most cases have been
reversible upon discontinuation of cyclosporine, and in some cases improvement was noted after reduction of dose. It appears
that patients receiving liver transplant are more susceptible to encephalopathy than those patients receiving kidney
transplant. Another rare manifestation of cyclosporine-induced neurotoxicity, occurring in transplant patients more
frequently than in other indications, is optic disc edema including papilloedema, with possible visual impairment, secondary to
benign intracranial hypertension.
Care should be taken in using cyclosporine with nephrotoxic drugs (see PRECAUTIONS).
Rheumatoid Arthritis
Cyclosporine nephropathy was detected
in renal biopsies of six out of 60 (10%) rheumatoid arthritis patients after the average treatment duration of 19 months.
Only one patient, out of these 6 patients, was treated with a dose ≤ 4 mg/kg/day. Serum creatinine improved in all
but one patient after discontinuation of cyclosporine. The “maximal creatinine increase” appears to be a factor in predicting
cyclosporine nephropathy.
There is a potential, as with other immunosuppressive agents,
for an increase in the occurrence of malignant lymphomas with cyclosporine. It is not clear whether the risk with
cyclosporine is greater than that in Rheumatoid Arthritis patients or in
Rheumatoid Arthritis patients on cytotoxic treatment for this indication.
Five cases of lymphoma were detected: four in a survey of approximately 2,300 patients treated with cyclosporine for
rheumatoid arthritis, and another case of lymphoma was reported in a clinical trial. Although other tumors (12 skin cancers, 24 solid
tumors of diverse types, and 1 multiple myeloma) were also reported in this survey, epidemiologic analyses did not support a
relationship to cyclosporine other than for malignant lymphomas.
Patients should be thoroughly evaluated before and during Gengraf®
(cyclosporine oral solution, USP [MODIFIED]) treatment for the development of malignancies. Moreover, use
of Gengraf® therapy with other immunosuppressive agents may induce an excessive immunosuppression which is known to
increase the risk of malignancy.
Psoriasis
(see also BOXED WARNINGS for Psoriasis). Since
cyclosporine is a potent immunosuppressive agent with a number of potentially
serious side effects, the risks and benefits of using Gengraf® (cyclosporine
oral solution, USP [MODIFIED]) should be considered before treatment
of patients with psoriasis. Cyclosporine, the active ingredient in Gengraf®,
can cause nephrotoxicity and hypertension (see PRECAUTIONS) and the risk
increases with increasing dose and duration of therapy. Patients who may be
at increased risk such as those with abnormal renal function, uncontrolled hypertension
or malignancies, should not receive Gengraf®.
Renal dysfunction is a potential consequence of Gengraf®,
therefore renal function must be monitored during therapy.
Patients receiving Gengraf® require frequent monitoring of serum creatinine
(see Special Monitoring under DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION).
Elderly patients should be monitored with particular care, since decreases in
renal function also occur with age. If patients are not properly monitored and
doses are not properly adjusted, cyclosporine therapy can cause structural kidney
damage and persistent renal dysfunction.
An increase in serum creatinine and BUN may occur during
Gengraf® therapy and reflects a reduction in the glomerular filtration rate.
Kidney biopsies from 86 psoriasis patients treated for a
mean duration of 23 months with 1.2 to 7.6 mg/kg/day of cyclosporine showed evidence of cyclosporine nephropathy in 18/86 (21%)
of the patients. The pathology consisted of renal tubular atrophy and interstitial fibrosis. On repeat biopsy of 13 of these
patients maintained on various dosages of cyclosporine for a mean of 2 additional years, the number with cyclosporine induced
nephropathy rose to 26/86 (30%). The majority of patients (19/26) were on a dose of ≥ 5 mg/kg/day (the highest
recommended dose is 4 mg/kg/day). The patients were also on cyclosporine for greater than 15 months (18/26) and/or had a clinically
significant increase in serum creatinine for greater than 1 month (21/26). Creatinine levels returned to normal range in 7 of 11
patients in whom cyclosporine therapy was discontinued.
There is an increased risk for the development of skin and
lymphoproliferative malignancies in cyclosporine-treated psoriasis patients. The relative risk of malignancies is
comparable to that observed in psoriasis patients treated with other immunosuppressive agents.
Tumors were reported in 32 (2.2%) of 1439 psoriasis patients
treated with cyclosporine worldwide from clinical trials. Additional tumors have been reported in 7 patients in
cyclosporine postmarketing experience. Skin malignancies were reported in 16 (1.1%) of these patients; all but 2 of them
had previously received PUVA therapy. Methotrexate was received by 7 patients. UVB and coal tar had been used by 2 and 3
patients, respectively. Seven patients had either a history of previous skin cancer or a potentially predisposing lesion was present
prior to cyclosporine exposure. Of the 16 patients with skin cancer, 11 patients had 18 squamous cell carcinomas and 7 patients
had 10 basal cell carcinomas.
There were two lymphoproliferative malignancies; one case of
non-Hodgkin's lymphoma which required chemotherapy, and one case of mycosis fungoides which regressed
spontaneously upon discontinuation of cyclosporine. There were four cases of benign lymphocytic infiltration: 3 regressed
spontaneously upon discontinuation of cyclosporine, while the fourth regressed despite continuation of the drug. The remainder of
the malignancies, 13 cases (0.9%), involved various organs.
Patients should not be treated concurrently with
cyclosporine and PUVA or UVB, other radiation therapy, or other immunosuppressive agents, because of the possibility of
excessive immunosuppression and the subsequent risk of malignancies (see CONTRAINDICATIONS). Patients should
also be warned to protect themselves appropriately when in the sun, and to avoid excessive sun exposure. Patients
should be thoroughly evaluated before and during treatment for the presence of malignancies remembering that malignant lesions
may be hidden by psoriatic plaques. Skin lesions not typical of psoriasis should be biopsied before starting treatment.
Patients should be treated with Gengraf® (cyclosporine oral solution, USP [MODIFIED]) only after complete resolution of suspicious
lesions, and only if there are no other treatment options (see Special Monitoring for Psoriasis Patients).