Pharmacokinetics
Average plasma concentrations (mcg/mL) of ertapenem following a single 30-minute infusion of a 1 g intravenous (IV) dose and administration of a single 1 g intramuscular (IM) dose in healthy young adults are presented in Table 1.
Table 1: Plasma Concentrations of Ertapenem in Adults After
Single Dose Administration
| Dose/Route |
0.5 hr |
1 hr |
2 hr |
4 hr |
6 hr |
8 hr |
12 hr |
18 hr |
24 hr |
| 1 g IV* |
155 |
115 |
83 |
48 |
31 |
20 |
9 |
3 |
1 |
| 1 g IM |
33 |
53 |
67 |
57 |
40 |
27 |
13 |
4 |
2 |
| *Infused at a constant rate over 30 minutes |
The area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) of ertapenem in adults
increased less-than dose-proportional based on total ertapenem concentrations
over the 0.5 to 2 g dose range, whereas the AUC increased greater-than dose-proportional
based on unbound ertapenem concentrations. Ertapenem exhibits non-linear pharmacokinetics
due to concentration-dependent plasma protein binding at the proposed therapeutic
dose. (See CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, Distribution.)
There is no accumulation of ertapenem following multiple IV or IM 1 g daily doses in healthy adults.
Average plasma concentrations (mcg/mL) of ertapenem in pediatric patients are presented in Table 2.
Table 2: Plasma Concentrations of Ertapenem in Pediatric
Patients After Single IV* Dose Administration
| Age Group |
Dose |
Average Plasma Concentrations (mcg/mL) |
| |
|
0.5 hr |
1 hr |
2 hr |
4 hr |
6 hr |
8 hr |
12 hr |
24 hr |
| 3 to 23 months |
| |
15 mg/kg† |
103.8 |
57.3 |
43.6 |
23.7 |
13.5 |
8.2 |
2.5 |
- |
| |
20 mg/kg† |
126.8 |
87.6 |
58.7 |
28.4 |
- |
12.0 |
3.4 |
0.4 |
| |
40 mg/kg‡ |
199.1 |
144.1 |
95.7 |
58.0 |
- |
20.2 |
7.7 |
0.6 |
| 2 to 12 years |
| |
15 mg/kg† |
113.2 |
63.9 |
42.1 |
21.9 |
12.8 |
7.6 |
3.0 |
- |
| |
20 mg/kg† |
147.6 |
97.6 |
63.2 |
34.5 |
- |
12.3 |
4.9 |
0.5 |
| |
40 mg/kg‡ |
241.7 |
152.7 |
96.3 |
55.6 |
- |
18.8 |
7.2 |
0.6 |
| 13 to 17 years |
| |
20 mg/kg† |
170.4 |
98.3 |
67.8 |
40.4 |
- |
16.0 |
7.0 |
1.1 |
| |
1 g§ |
155.9 |
110.9 |
74.8 |
- |
24.0 |
- |
6.2 |
- |
| |
40 mg/kg‡ |
255.0 |
188.7 |
127.9 |
76.2 |
- |
31.0 |
15.3 |
2.1 |
Infused at a constant rate over 30 minutes
† up to a maximum dose of 1 g/day
‡ up to a maximum dose of 2 g/day
§ Based on three patients receiving 1 g ertapenem who volunteered
for pharmacokinetic assessment in one of the two safety and efficacy studies
|
Absorption
Ertapenem, reconstituted with 1% lidocaine HCl injection, USP (in saline without
epinephrine), is almost completely absorbed following intramuscular (IM) administration
at the recommended dose of 1 g. The mean bioavailability is approximately 90%.
Following 1 g daily IM administration, mean peak plasma concentrations (Cmax)
are achieved in approximately 2.3 hours (Tmax).
Distribution
Ertapenem is highly bound to human plasma proteins, primarily albumin. In healthy young adults, the protein binding of ertapenem decreases as plasma concentrations increase, from approximately 95% bound at an approximate plasma concentration of < 100 micrograms (mcg)/mL to approximately 85% bound at an approximate plasma concentration of 300 mcg/mL
The apparent volume of distribution at steady state (Vss) of ertapenem
in adults is approximately 0.12 liter/kg, approximately 0.2 liter/kg in pediatric
patients 3 months to 12 years of age and approximately 0.16 liter/kg in pediatric
patients 13 to 17 years of age.
The concentrations of ertapenem achieved in suction-induced skin blister fluid
at each sampling point on the third day of 1 g once daily IV doses are presented
in Table 3. The ratio of AUC0-24 in skin blister fluid/AUC0-24
in plasma is 0.61.
Table 3: Concentrations (mcg/mL) of Ertapenem in Adult Skin
Blister Fluid at each Sampling Point on the Third Day of 1-g Once Daily IV Doses
| 0.5 hr |
1 hr |
2 hr |
4 hr |
8 hr |
12 hr |
24 hr |
| 7 |
12 |
17 |
24 |
24 |
21 |
8 |
The concentration of ertapenem in breast milk from 5 lactating women with pelvic
infections (5 to 14 days postpartum) was measured at random time points daily
for 5 consecutive days following the last 1 g dose of intravenous therapy (3-10
days of therapy). The concentration of ertapenem in breast milk within 24 hours
of the last dose of therapy in all 5 women ranged from < 0.13 (lower limit
of quantitation) to 0.38 mcg/mL; peak concentrations were not assessed. By day
5 after discontinuation of therapy, the level of ertapenem was undetectable
in the breast milk of 4 women and below the lower limit of quantitation ( < 0.13
mcg/mL) in 1 woman.
Metabolism
In healthy young adults, after infusion of 1 g IV radiolabeled ertapenem, the plasma radioactivity consists predominantly (94%) of ertapenem. The major metabolite of ertapenem is the inactive ring-opened derivative formed by hydrolysis of the beta-lactam ring.
In vitro studies in human liver microsomes indicate that ertapenem does
not inhibit metabolism mediated by any of the following cytochrome p450 (CYP)
isoforms: 1A2, 2C9, 2C19, 2D6, 2E1 and 3A4. (See PRECAUTIONS: DRUG
INTERACTIONS.)
In vitro studies indicate that ertapenem does not inhibit P-glycoprotein-mediated
transport of digoxin or vinblastine and that ertapenem is not a substrate for
P-glycoprotein-mediated transport. (See PRECAUTIONS: DRUG
INTERACTIONS)
Elimination
Ertapenem is eliminated primarily by the kidneys. The mean plasma half-life in healthy young adults is approximately 4 hours and the plasma clearance is approximately 1.8 L/hour. The mean plasma half-life in pediatric patients 13 to 17 years of age is approximately 4 hours and approximately 2.5 hours in pediatric patients 3 months to 12 years of age.
Following the administration of 1 g IV radiolabeled ertapenem to healthy young adults, approximately 80% is recovered in urine and 10% in feces. Of the 80% recovered in urine, approximately 38% is excreted as unchanged drug and approximately 37% as the ring-opened metabolite.
In healthy young adults given a 1 g IV dose, the mean percentage of the administered
dose excreted in urine was 17.4% during 0-2 hours postdose, 5.4% during 4-6
hours postdose, and 2.4% during 12-24 hours postdose.
Special Populations
Renal Insufficiency
Total and unbound fractions of ertapenem pharmacokinetics were investigated
in 26 adult subjects (31 to 80 years of age) with varying degrees of renal impairment.
Following a single 1 g IV dose of ertapenem, the unbound AUC increased 1.5-fold
and 2.3-fold in subjects with mild renal insufficiency (CLCR 60-90
mL/min/1.73 m2) and moderate renal insufficiency (CLCR
31-59 mL/min/1.73 m2), respectively, compared with healthy young
subjects (25 to 45 years of age). No dosage adjustment is necessary in patients
with CLCR ≥ 31 mL/min/1.73 m2. The unbound
AUC increased 4.4-fold and 7.6-fold in subjects with advanced renal insufficiency
(CLCR 5-30 mL/min/1.73 m2) and end-stage renal insufficiency
(CLCR < 10 mL/min/1.73 m2), respectively, compared
with healthy young subjects. The effects of renal insufficiency on AUC of total
drug were of smaller magnitude. The recommended dose of ertapenem in adult patients
with CLCR ≤ 30 mL/min/1.73 m2 is 0.5 grams every 24
hours. Following a single 1 g IV dose given immediately prior to a 4 hour hemodialysis
session in 5 adult patients with end-stage renal insufficiency, approximately
30% of the dose was recovered in the dialysate. A supplementary dose of 150
mg is recommended if ertapenem is administered within 6 hours prior to hemodialysis.
(See DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION.) There are
no data in pediatric patients with renal insufficiency.
Hepatic Insufficiency
The pharmacokinetics of ertapenem in patients with hepatic insufficiency have
not been established. However, ertapenem does not appear to undergo hepatic
metabolism based on in vitro studies and approximately 10% of an administered
dose is recovered in the feces. (See PRECAUTIONS
and DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION.)
Gender
The effect of gender on the pharmacokinetics of ertapenem was evaluated in
healthy male (n=8) and healthy female (n=8) subjects. The differences observed
could be attributed to body size when body weight was taken into consideration.
No dose adjustment is recommended based on gender.
Geriatric Patients
The impact of age on the pharmacokinetics of ertapenem was evaluated in healthy
male (n=7) and healthy female (n=7) subjects ≥ 65 years of age. The total
and unbound AUC increased 37% and 67%, respectively, in elderly adults relative
to young adults. These changes were attributed to age-related changes in creatinine
clearance. No dosage adjustment is necessary for elderly patients with normal
(for their age) renal function.
Pediatric Patients
Plasma concentrations of ertapenem are comparable in pediatric patients 13 to 17 years of age and adults following a 1 g once daily IV dose.
Following the 20 mg/kg dose (up to a maximum dose of 1 g), the pharmacokinetic parameter values in patients 13 to 17 years of age (N=6) were generally comparable to those in healthy young adults.
Plasma concentrations at the midpoint of the dosing interval following a single
15 mg/kg IV dose of ertapenem in patients 3 months to 12 years of age are comparable
to plasma concentrations at the midpoint of the dosing interval following a
1 g once daily IV dose in adults (see Pharmacokinetics). The plasma clearance
(mL/min/kg) of ertapenem in patients 3 months to 12 years of age is approximately
2-fold higher as compared to that in adults. At the 15 mg/kg dose, the AUC value
(doubled to model a twice daily dosing regimen, i.e., 30 mg/kg/day exposure)
in patients 3 months to 12 years of age was comparable to the AUC value in young
healthy adults receiving a 1 g IV dose of ertapenem.
Microbiology
Ertapenem has in vitro activity against gram-positive and gram-negative
aerobic and anaerobic bacteria. The bactericidal activity of ertapenem results
from the inhibition of cell wall synthesis and is mediated through ertapenem
binding to penicillin binding proteins (PBPs). In Escherichia coli, it
has strong affinity toward PBPs 1a, 1b, 2, 3, 4 and 5 with preference for PBPs
2 and 3. Ertapenem is stable against hydrolysis by a variety of beta-lactamases,
including penicillinases, and cephalosporinases and extended spectrum beta-lactamases.
Ertapenem is hydrolyzed by metallo-beta-lactamases.
Ertapenem has been shown to be active against most isolates of the following
microorganisms in vitro and in clinical infections. (See INDICATIONS):
Aerobic and facultative gram-positive microorganisms:
Staphylococcus aureus (methicillin susceptible isolates only)
Streptococcus agalactiae
Streptococcus pneumoniae (penicillin susceptible isolates only)
Streptococcus pyogenes
Note: Methicillin-resistant staphylococci and Enterococcus spp. are
resistant to ertapenem.
Aerobic and facultative gram-negative microorganisms:
Escherichia coli
Haemophilus influenzae (Beta-lactamase negative isolates only)
Klebsiella pneumoniae
Moraxella catarrhalis
Proteus mirabilis
Anaerobic microorganisms:
Bacteroides fragilis
Bacteroides distasonis
Bacteroides ovatus
Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron
Bacteroides uniformis
Clostridium clostridioforme
Eubacterium lentum
Peptostreptococcus species
Porphyromonas asaccharolytica
Prevotella bivia
The following in vitro data are available, but their clinical significance
is unknown.
At least 90% of the following microorganisms exhibit an in vitro minimum
inhibitory concentration (MIC) less than or equal to the susceptible breakpoint
for ertapenem; however, the safety and effectiveness of ertapenem in treating
clinical infections due to these microorganisms have not been established in
adequate and well-controlled clinical studies:
Aerobic and facultative gram-positive microorganisms:
Staphylococcus epidermidis (methicillin susceptible isolates only)
Streptococcus pneumoniae (penicillin-intermediate isolates only)
Aerobic and facultative gram-negative microorganisms:
Citrobacter freundii
Citrobacter koseri
Enterobacter aerogenes
Enterobacter cloacae
Haemophilus influenzae (Beta-lactamase positive isolates)
Haemophilus parainfluenzae
Klebsiella oxytoca (excluding ESBL producing isolates)
Morganella morganii
Proteus vulgaris
Providencia rettgeri
Providencia stuartii
Serratia marcescens
Anaerobic microorganisms:
Bacteroides vulgatus
Clostridium perfringens
Fusobacterium spp.
Susceptibility Test Methods
When available, the results of in vitro susceptibility tests should
be provided to the physician as periodic reports which describe the susceptibility
profile of nosocomial and community-acquired pathogens. These reports should
aid the physician in selecting the most effective antimicrobial.
Dilution Techniques
Quantitative methods are used to determine antimicrobial minimum inhibitory
concentrations (MICs). These MICs provide estimates of the susceptibility of
bacteria to antimicrobial compounds. The MICs should be determined using a standardized
procedure. Standardized procedures are based on a broth dilution method1,2
or equivalent with standardized inoculum concentrations and standardized concentrations
of ertapenem powder. The MIC values should be interpreted according to criteria
provided in Table 4.
Diffusion Techniques
Quantitative methods that require measurement of zone diameters also provide
reproducible estimates of the susceptibility of bacteria to antimicrobial compounds.
One such standardized procedure2,3 requires the use of standardized
inoculum concentrations. This procedure uses paper disks impregnated with 10-µg
ertapenem to test the susceptibility of microorganisms to ertapenem. The disk
diffusion interpretive criteria should be interpreted according to criteria
provided in Table 4.
Anaerobic Techniques
For anaerobic bacteria, the susceptibility to ertapenem as MICs can be determined
by standardized test methods4. The MIC values obtained should be
interpreted according to criteria provided in Table 4.
Table 4: Susceptibility Interpretive Criteria for Ertapenem
| Pathogen |
Minimum Inhibitory Concentrations* MIC (µg/mL) |
Disk Diffusion* Zone Diameter (mm) |
| |
S |
I |
R |
S |
I |
R |
| Enterobacteriaceae and Staphylococcus spp. |
≤ 2.0 |
4.0 |
≥ 8.0 |
≥ 19 |
16-18 |
≤ 15 |
| Haemophilus spp. |
≤ 0.5 |
- |
- |
≥ 19 |
- |
- |
| Streptococcus pneumoniae †,‡ |
≤ 1.0 |
- |
- |
≥ 19 |
- |
- |
| Streptococcus spp. other than Streptococcus pneumoniae
§,¶ |
≤ 1.0 |
- |
- |
≥ 19 |
- |
- |
| Anaerobes |
≤ 4.0 |
8.0 |
≥ 16.0 |
- |
- |
- |
* The current absence of data in resistant isolates precludes
defining any results other than “Susceptible”. Isolates yielding MIC results
suggestive of a “Nonsusceptible” category should be submitted to a reference
laboratory for further testing.
† Streptococcus pneumoniae that are susceptible to penicillin (penicillin
MIC ≤ 0.06 µg/mL) can be considered susceptible to ertapenem. Testing
of ertapenem against penicillin-intermediate or penicillin-resistant isolates
is not recommended since reliable interpretive criteria for ertapenem are
not available.
‡ Streptococcus pneumoniae that are susceptible to penicillin (1-µg
oxacillin disk zone diameter ≥ 20 mm), can be considered susceptible to
ertapenem. Isolates with 1-µg oxacillin zone diameter < 19 mm should
be tested against ertapenem using an MIC method.
§ Streptococcus spp. other than Streptococcus
pneumoniae that are susceptible to penicillin (MIC ≤ 0.12 µg/mL)
can be considered susceptible to ertapenem. Testing of ertapenem against
penicillin-intermediate or penicillin-resistant isolates is not recommended
since reliable interpretive criteria for ertapenem are not available.
¶ Streptococcus spp. other than Streptococcus
pneumoniae that are susceptible to penicillin (10-units penicillin disk
zone diameter > 24 mm), can be considered susceptible to ertapenem. Isolates
with 10-units penicillin disk zone diameter ≤ 24 mm should be tested against
ertapenem using an MIC method. Penicillin disk diffusion interpretive criteria
are not available for viridans group streptococci and they should not be
tested against ertapenem. |
Note: Staphylococcus spp. can be considered susceptible to ertapenem
if the penicillin MIC is ≤ 0.12 µg/mL. If the penicillin MIC is > 0.12 µg/mL,
then test oxacillin. Staphylococcus aureus can be considered susceptible
to ertapenem if the oxacillin MIC is ≤ 2.0 µg/mL and resistant to ertapenem
if the oxacillin MIC is ≥ 4.0 µg/mL. Coagulase negative staphylococci can
be considered susceptible to ertapenem if the oxacillin MIC is ≤ 0.25 µg/mL
and resistant to ertapenem if the oxacillin MIC is ≥ 0.5 µg/mL.
Staphylococcus spp. can be considered susceptible to ertapenem if the
penicillin (10 U disk) zone is ≥ 29 mm. If the penicillin zone is ≤ 28 mm,
then test oxacillin by disk diffusion (1 µg disk). Staphylococcus aureus
can be considered susceptible to ertapenem if the oxacillin (1 µg disk)
zone is ≥ 13 mm and resistant to ertapenem if the oxacillin zone is ≤ 10
mm. Coagulase negative staphylococci can be considered susceptible to ertapenem
if the oxacillin zone is ≥ 18 mm and resistant to ertapenem if the oxacillin
(1 µg disk) zone is ≤ 17 mm.
A report of “Susceptible” indicates that the pathogen is likely to be inhibited
if the antimicrobial compound in blood reaches the concentrations usually achievable.
A report of “Intermediate” indicates that the result should be considered equivocal,
and, if the microorganism is not fully susceptible to alternative, clinically
feasible drugs, the test should be repeated. This category implies possible
clinical applicability in body sites where the drug is physiologically concentrated
or in situations where high dosage of drug can be used. This category also provides
a buffer zone which prevents small uncontrolled technical factors from causing
major discrepancies in interpretation. A report of “Resistant” indicates that
the pathogen is not likely to be inhibited if the antimicrobial compound in
the blood reaches the concentrations usually achievable; other therapy should
be selected.
Quality Control
Standardized susceptibility test procedures require the use of laboratory control
microorganisms to control the technical aspects of the laboratory procedures1,2,3,4.
Quality control microorganisms are specific strains of organisms with intrinsic
biological properties. QC strains are very stable strains which will give a
standard and repeatable susceptibility pattern. The specific strains used for
microbiological quality control are not clinically significant. Standard ertapenem
powder should provide the following range of values noted in Table 5.
Table 5: Acceptable Quality Control Ranges for Ertapenem
| Microorganism |
Minimum Inhibitory Concentrations MIC Range
(µg/mL) |
Disk Diffusion Zone Diameter (mm) |
| Escherichia coli ATCC 25922 |
0.004-0.016 |
29-36 |
| Haemophilus influenzae ATCC 49766 |
0.016-0.06 |
27-33 |
| Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 29213 |
0.06-0.25 |
- |
| Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 25923 |
- |
24-31 |
| Streptococcus pneumoniae ATCC 49619 |
0.03-0.25 |
28-35 |
| Bacteroides fragilis ATCC 25285 |
0.06-0.5*
0.06-0.25† |
- |
| Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron ATCC 29741 |
0.5-2.0*
0.25-1.0† |
- |
| Eubacterium lentum ATCC 43055 |
0.5-4.0*
0.5-2.0† |
- |
* Quality control ranges for broth microdilution testing
† Quality control ranges for agar microdilution testing |
Clinical Studies
Adults
Complicated Intra-Abdominal Infections
Ertapenem was evaluated in adults for the treatment of complicated intra-abdominal
infections in a clinical trial. This study compared ertapenem (1 g intravenously
once a day) with piperacillin/tazobactam (3.375 g intravenously every 6 hours)
for 5 to 14 days and enrolled 665 patients with localized complicated appendicitis,
and any other complicated intra-abdominal infection including colonic, small
intestinal, and biliary infections and generalized peritonitis. The combined
clinical and microbiologic success rates in the microbiologically evaluable
population at 4 to 6 weeks posttherapy (test-of-cure) were 83.6% (163/195) for
ertapenem and 80.4% (152/189) for piperacillin/tazobactam.
Complicated Skin and Skin Structure Infections
Ertapenem was evaluated in adults for the treatment of complicated skin and
skin structure infections in a clinical trial. This study compared ertapenem
(1 g intravenously once a day) with piperacillin/tazobactam (3.375 g intravenously
every 6 hours) for 7 to 14 days and enrolled 540 patients including patients
with deep soft tissue abscess, posttraumatic wound infection and cellulitis
with purulent drainage. The clinical success rates at 10 to 21 days posttherapy
(test-of-cure) were 83.9% (141/168) for ertapenem and 85.3% (145/170) for piperacillin/tazobactam.
Diabetic Foot Infections
Ertapenem was evaluated in adults for the treatment of diabetic foot infections
without concomitant osteomyelitis in a multicenter, randomized, double-blind
clinical trial. This study compared ertapenem (1 g intravenously once a day)
with piperacillin/tazobactam (3.375 g intravenously every 6 hours). Test-of-cure
was defined as clinical response between treatment groups in the clinically
evaluable population at the 10-day posttherapy follow-up visit. The study included
295 patients randomized to ertapenem and 291 patients to piperacillin/tazobactam.
Both regimens allowed the option to switch to oral amoxicillin/clavulanate for
a total of 5 to 28 days of treatment (parenteral and oral). All patients were
eligible to receive appropriate adjunctive treatment methods, such as debridement,
as is typically required in the treatment of diabetic foot infections, and most
patients received these treatments. Patients with suspected osteomyelitis could
be enrolled if all the infected bone was removed within 2 days of initiation
of study therapy, and preferably within the prestudy period. Investigators had
the option to add open-label vancomycin if enterococci or methicillin-resistant
Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) were among the pathogens isolated or if
patients had a history of MRSA infection and additional therapy was indicated
in the opinion of the investigator. Two hundred and four (204) patients randomized
to ertapenem and 202 patients randomized to piperacillin/tazobactam were clinically
evaluable. The clinical success rates at 10 days posttherapy were 75.0% (153/204)
for ertapenem and 70.8% (143/202) for piperacillin/tazobactam.
Community Acquired Pneumonia
Ertapenem was evaluated in adults for the treatment of community acquired pneumonia in two clinical trials. Both studies compared ertapenem (1 g parenterally once a day) with ceftriaxone (1 g parenterally once a day) and enrolled a total of 866 patients. Both regimens allowed the option to switch to oral amoxicillin/clavulanate for a total of 10 to 14 days of treatment (parenteral and oral). In the first study the primary efficacy parameter was the clinical success rate in the clinically evaluable population and success rates were 92.3% (168/182) for ertapenem and 91.0% (183/201) for ceftriaxone at 7 to 14 days posttherapy (test-of-cure). In the second study the primary efficacy parameter was the clinical success rate in the microbiologically evaluable population and success rates were 91% (91/100) for ertapenem and 91.8% (45/49) for ceftriaxone at 7 to 14 days posttherapy (test-of-cure).
Complicated Urinary Tract Infections Including Pyelonephritis
Ertapenem was evaluated in adults for the treatment of complicated urinary
tract infections including pyelonephritis in two clinical trials. Both studies
compared ertapenem (1 g parenterally once a day) with ceftriaxone (1 g parenterally
once a day) and enrolled a total of 850 patients. Both regimens allowed the
option to switch to oral ciprofloxacin (500 mg twice daily) for a total of 10
to 14 days of treatment (parenteral and oral). The microbiological success rates
(combined studies) at 5 to 9 days posttherapy (test-of-cure) were 89.5% (229/256)
for ertapenem and 91.1% (204/224) for ceftriaxone.
Acute Pelvic Infections Including Endomyometritis, Septic Abortion and Post-Surgical
Gynecological Infections
Ertapenem was evaluated in adults for the treatment of acute pelvic infections
in a clinical trial. This study compared ertapenem (1 g intravenously once a
day) with piperacillin/tazobactam (3.375 g intravenously every 6 hours) for
3 to 10 days and enrolled 412 patients including 350 patients with obstetric/postpartum
infections and 45 patients with septic abortion. The clinical success rates
in the clinically evaluable population at 2 to 4 weeks posttherapy (test-of-cure)
were 93.9% (153/163) for ertapenem and 91.5% (140/153) for piperacillin/tazobactam.
Prophylaxis of Surgical Site Infections Following Elective Colorectal Surgery
Ertapenem was evaluated in adults for prophylaxis of surgical site infection
following elective colorectal surgery in a multicenter, randomized, double-blind
clinical trial. This study compared a single intravenous dose of ertapenem (1
g) versus cefotetan (2 g) administered over 30 minutes, 1 hour before elective
colorectal surgery. Test-of-prophylaxis was defined as no evidence of surgical
site infection, postoperative anastomotic leak, or unexplained antibiotic use
in the clinically evaluable population up to and including at the 4-week posttreatment
follow-up visit. The study included 500 patients randomized to ertapenem and
502 patients randomized to cefotetan. The modified intent-to-treat (MITT) population
consisted of 451 ertapenem patients and 450 cefotetan patients and included
all patients who were randomized, treated, and underwent elective colorectal
surgery with adequate bowel preparation. The clinically evaluable population
was a subset of the MITT population and consisted of patients who received a
complete dose of study therapy no more than two hours prior to surgical incision
and no more than six hours before surgical closure. Clinically evaluable patients
had sufficient information to determine outcome at the 4-week follow-up assessment
and had no confounding factors that interfered with the assessment of that outcome.
Examples of confounding factors included prior or concomitant antibiotic violations,
the need for a second surgical procedure during the study period, and identification
of a distant site infection with concomitant antibiotic administration and no
evidence of subsequent wound infection. Three-hundred forty-six (346) patients
randomized to ertapenem and 339 patients randomized to cefotetan were clinically
evaluable. The prophylactic success rates at 4 weeks posttreatment in the clinically
evaluable population were 70.5% (244/346) for ertapenem and 57.2% (194/339)
for cefotetan (difference 13.3%, [95% C.I.: 6.1, 20.4], p < 0.001). Prophylaxis
failure due to surgical site infections occurred in 18.2% (63/346) ertapenem
patients and 31.0% (105/339) cefotetan patients. Post-operative anastomotic
leak occurred in 2.9% (10/346) ertapenem patients and 4.1% (14/339) cefotetan
patients. Unexplained antibiotic use occurred in 8.4% (29/346) ertapenem patients
and 7.7% (26/339) cefotetan patients. Though patient numbers were small in some
subgroups, in general, clinical response rates by age, gender, and race were
consistent with the results found in the clinically evaluable population. In
the MITT analysis, the prophylactic success rates at 4 weeks posttreatment were
58.3% (263/451) for ertapenem and 48.9% (220/450) for cefotetan (difference
9.4%, [95% C.I.: 2.9, 15.9], p=0.002). A statistically significant difference
favoring ertapenem over cefotetan with respect to the primary endpoint has been
observed at a significance level of 5% in this study. A second adequate and
well-controlled study to confirm these findings has not been conducted; therefore,
the clinical superiority of ertapenem over cefotetan has not been demonstrated.
Pediatric Patients
Ertapenem was evaluated in pediatric patients 3 months to 17 years of age in
two randomized, multicenter clinical trials. The first study enrolled 404 patients
and compared ertapenem (15 mg/kg IV every 12 hours in patients 3 months to 12
years of age, and 1 g IV once a day in patients 13 to 17 years of age) to ceftriaxone
(50 mg/kg/day IV in two divided doses in patients 3 months to 12 years of age
and 50 mg/kg/day IV as a single daily dose in patients 13 to 17 years of age)
for the treatment of complicated urinary tract infection (UTI), skin and soft
tissue infection (SSTI), or community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). Both regimens
allowed the option to switch to oral amoxicillin/clavulanate for a total of
up to 14 days of treatment (parenteral and oral). The microbiological success
rates in the evaluable per protocol (EPP) analysis in patients treated for UTI
were 87.0% (40/46) for ertapenem and 90.0% (18/20) for ceftriaxone. The clinical
success rates in the EPP analysis in patients treated for SSTI were 95.5% (64/67)
for ertapenem and 100% (26/26) for ceftriaxone, and in patients treated for
CAP were 96.1% (74/77) for ertapenem and 96.4% (27/28) for ceftriaxone.
The second study enrolled 112 patients and compared ertapenem (15 mg/kg IV every 12 hours in patients 3 months to 12 years of age, and 1 g IV once a day in patients 13 to 17 years of age) to ticarcillin/clavulanate (50 mg/kg for patients < 60 kg or 3.0 g for patients > 60 kg, 4 or 6 times a day) up to 14 days for the treatment of complicated intra-abdominal infections (IAI) and acute pelvic infections (API). In patients treated for IAI (primarily patients with perforated or complicated appendicitis), the clinical success rates were 83.7% (36/43) for ertapenem and 63.6% (7/11) for ticarcillin/clavulanate in the EPP analysis. In patients treated for API (post-operative or spontaneous obstetrical endomyometritis, or septic abortion), the clinical success rates were 100% (23/23) for ertapenem and 100% (4/4) for ticarcillin/clavulanate in the EPP analysis.
Animal pharmacology
In repeat-dose studies in rats, treatment-related neutropenia occurred at every dose-level tested, including the lowest dose of 2 mg/kg (approximately 2% of the human dose on a body surface area basis).
Studies in rabbits and Rhesus monkeys were inconclusive with regard to the effect on neutrophil counts.
REFERENCES
1. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). Methods for Dilution
Antimicrobial Susceptibility Tests for Bacteria that Grow Aerobically. Seventh
Edition; Approved Standard, CLSI Document M7-A7. Clinical and Laboratory Standards
Institute, Wayne, PA, January 2006.
2. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). Performance Standards
for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing - Sixteenth Informational Supplement.
Approved Standard, CLSI Document M100-S16. Clinical and Laboratory Standards
Institute, Wayne, PA, January 2006.
3. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). Performance Standards
for Antimicrobial Disk Susceptibility Tests. Ninth Edition; Approved Standard,
CLSI Document M2-A9. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA,
January 2006.
4. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). Methods for
Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing of Anaerobic Bacteria - Sixth Edition;
Approved Standard, CLSI Document M11-A6. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute,
Wayne, PA, January 2004.
Last updated on RxList: 10/29/2009