Mechanism of Action
Lopinavir is an antiviral drug.
Pharmacokinetics
The pharmacokinetic properties of lopinavir co-administered
with ritonavir have been evaluated in healthy adult volunteers and in HIV-1 infected patients; no
substantial differences were observed between the two groups. Lopinavir is essentially completely
metabolized by CYP3A. Ritonavir inhibits the metabolism of lopinavir, thereby increasing the plasma
levels of lopinavir. Across studies, administration of KALETRA 400/100 mg twice-daily yields mean
steady-state lopinavir plasma concentrations 15- to 20-fold higher than those of ritonavir
in HIV-1 infected patients. The plasma levels of ritonavir are less than 7% of those obtained after
the ritonavir dose of 600 mg twice-daily. The in vitro antiviral EC50 of lopinavir is approximately
10-fold lower than that of ritonavir. Therefore, the antiviral activity of KALETRA is due to lopinavir.
Figure 1 displays the mean steady-state plasma
concentrations of lopinavir and ritonavir after KALETRA 400/100 mg twice-daily with food for 3 weeks from a
pharmacokinetic study in HIV-1 infected adult subjects (n = 19).
Figure 1. Mean Steady-state Plasma Concentrations with 95%
Confidence Intervals (CI) for HIV-1 Infected Adult Subjects (N = 19)
Absorption
In a pharmacokinetic study in HIV-1 positive subjects (n =
19), multiple dosing with 400/100 mg KALETRA twice-daily with food for 3 weeks produced a mean ±
SD lopinavir peak plasma concentration (Cmax) of 9.8 ± 3.7 μg/mL, occurring
approximately 4 hours after administration. The mean steady-state trough concentration prior to the morning
dose was 7.1 ± 2.9 μg/mL and minimum concentration within a dosing interval was 5.5 ± 2.7
μg/mL. Lopinavir AUC over a 12 hour dosing interval averaged 92.6 ± 36.7 μg•h/mL. The absolute
bioavailability of lopinavir co-formulated with ritonavir in humans has not been established. Under
nonfasting conditions (500 kcal, 25% from fat), lopinavir concentrations were similar following administration
of KALETRA co-formulated capsules and oral solution. When administered under fasting
conditions, both the mean AUC and Cmax of lopinavir were 22% lower for the KALETRA oral solution
relative to the capsule formulation.
Plasma concentrations of lopinavir and ritonavir after
administration of two 200/50 mg KALETRA tablets are similar to three 133.3/33.3 mg KALETRA capsules
under fed conditions with less pharmacokinetic variability.
Effects of Food on Oral Absorption
KALETRA Tablets
No clinically significant changes in Cmax and AUC were
observed following administration of KALETRA tablets under fed conditions compared to fasted
conditions. Relative to fasting, administration of KALETRA tablets with a moderate fat meal
(500 - 682 Kcal, 23 to 25% calories from fat) increased lopinavir AUC and Cmax by 26.9% and 17.6%,
respectively. Relative to fasting, administration of KALETRA tablets with a high fat meal (872
Kcal, 56% from fat) increased lopinavir AUC by 18.9% but not Cmax. Therefore, KALETRA tablets may be
taken with or without food.
KALETRA Oral Solution
Relative to fasting, administration of KALETRA oral solution
with a moderate fat meal (500 - 682 Kcal, 23 to 25% calories from fat) increased lopinavir AUC and
Cmax by 80 and 54%, respectively. Relative to fasting, administration of KALETRA oral solution with a
high fat meal (872 Kcal, 56% from fat) increased lopinavir AUC and Cmax by 130% and 56%,
respectively. To enhance bioavailability and minimize pharmacokinetic variability KALETRA oral solution
should be taken with food.
Distribution
At steady state, lopinavir is approximately 98-99% bound to
plasma proteins. Lopinavir binds to both alpha-1-acid glycoprotein (AAG) and albumin; however, it has
a higher affinity for AAG. At steady state, lopinavir protein binding remains constant over the
range of observed concentrations after 400/100 mg KALETRA twice-daily, and is similar between
healthy volunteers and HIV-1 positive patients.
Metabolism
In vitro experiments with human hepatic microsomes indicate
that lopinavir primarily undergoes oxidative metabolism. Lopinavir is extensively metabolized
by the hepatic cytochrome P450 system, almost exclusively by the CYP3A isozyme. Ritonavir is a
potent CYP3A inhibitor which inhibits the metabolism of lopinavir, and therefore increases plasma
levels of lopinavir. A 14C-lopinavir study in humans showed that 89% of the plasma radioactivity after a
single 400/100 mg KALETRA dose was due to parent drug. At least 13 lopinavir oxidative
metabolites have been identified in man. Ritonavir has been shown to induce metabolic enzymes, resulting in the
induction of its own metabolism. Predose lopinavir concentrations decline with time during multiple
dosing, stabilizing after approximately 10 to 16 days.
Elimination
Following a 400/100 mg 14C-lopinavir/ritonavir dose,
approximately 10.4 ± 2.3% and 82.6 ± 2.5% of an administered dose of 14C-lopinavir can be accounted for
in urine and feces, respectively, after 8 days. Unchanged lopinavir accounted for approximately 2.2
and 19.8% of the administered dose in urine and feces, respectively. After multiple dosing, less
than 3% of the lopinavir dose is excreted unchanged in the urine. The apparent oral clearance (CL/F)
of lopinavir is 5.98 ± 5.75 L/hr (mean ± SD, n = 19).
Once-Daily Dosing
The pharmacokinetics of once-daily KALETRA have been
evaluated in HIV-1 infected subjects naïve to antiretroviral treatment. KALETRA 800/200 mg was
administered in combination with emtricitabine 200 mg and tenofovir DF 300 mg as part of a once-daily regimen.
Multiple dosing of 800/200 mg KALETRA once-daily for 4 weeks with food (n = 24) produced a
mean ± SD lopinavir peak plasma concentration (Cmax) of 11.8 ± 3.7 μg/mL, occurring
approximately 6 hours after administration. The mean steady-state lopinavir trough concentration prior to
the morning dose was 3.2 ± 2.1 μg/mL and minimum concentration within a dosing interval was 1.7 ± 1.6
μg/mL. Lopinavir AUC over a 24 hour dosing interval averaged 154.1 ± 61.4 μgh/mL.
Effects on Electrocardiogram
QTcF interval was evaluated in a randomized, placebo and
active (moxifloxacin 400 mg once-daily) controlled crossover study in 39 healthy adults, with 10
measurements over 12 hours on Day 3. The maximum mean time-matched (95% upper confidence bound)
differences in QTcF interval from placebo after baseline-correction were 5.3 (8.1) and 15.2
(18.0) mseconds (msec) for 400/100 mg twice-daily and supratherapeutic 800/200 mg twice-daily
KALETRA, respectively. KALETRA 800/200 mg twice daily resulted in a Day 3 mean Cmax approximately
2-fold higher than the mean Cmax observed with the approved once daily and twice daily
KALETRA doses at steady state.
PR interval prolongation was also noted in subjects receiving KALETRA in the
same study on Day 3. The maximum mean (95% upper confidence bound) difference
from placebo in the PR interval after baseline-correction were 24.9 (21.5, 28.3)
and 31.9 (28.5, 35.3) msec for 400/100 mg twice-daily and supratherapeutic 800/200
mg twice-daily KALETRA, respectively [See WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS]
.
Special Populations
Gender, Race and Age
No gender related pharmacokinetic differences have been
observed in adult patients. No clinically important pharmacokinetic differences due to race have been
identified. Lopinavir pharmacokinetics have not been studied in elderly patients.
Pediatric Patients
The pharmacokinetics of KALETRA oral solution 300/75 mg/m² twice-daily
and 230/57.5 mg/m² twicedaily have been studied in a total of 53 pediatric
patients in Study 940, ranging in age from 6 months to 12 years [see Clinical
Studies]. The 230/57.5 mg/m² twice-daily regimen without nevirapine
and the 300/75 mg/m² twice-daily regimen with nevirapine provided lopinavir
plasma concentrations similar to those obtained in adult patients receiving
the 400/100 mg twice-daily regimen (without nevirapine).
The mean steady-state lopinavir AUC, Cmax, and Cmin were
72.6 ± 31.1 μg•h/mL, 8.2 ± 2.9 and 3.4 ± 2.1 μg/mL, respectively after KALETRA oral solution
230/57.5 mg/m² twice-daily without nevirapine (n = 12), and were 85.8 ± 36.9 μgh/mL, 10.0 ± 3.3 and
3.6 ± 3.5 μg/mL, respectively, after 300/75 mg/m² twice-daily with nevirapine (n = 12). The nevirapine
regimen was 7 mg/kg twice-daily (6 months to 8 years) or 4 mg/kg twice-daily ( > 8 years).
The pharmacokinetics of KALETRA oral solution at
approximately 300/75 mg/m² twice-daily have also been evaluated in infants at approximately 6 weeks of
age (n = 9) and between 6 weeks and 6 months of age (n = 18) in Study 1030. The mean steady-state
lopinavir AUC12, Cmax, and C12 were 43.4 ± 14.8 μgh/mL, 5.2 ± 1.8 μg/mL and 1.9 ±
1.1 μg/mL, respectively, in infants at approximately 6 weeks of age, and 74.5 ± 37.9 μgh/mL, 9.4 ± 4.9 and
3.1 ± 1.8 μg/mL, respectively, in infants between 6 weeks and 6 months of age after KALETRA oral
solution was administered at approximately 300/75 mg/m² twice-daily without concomitant
NNRTI therapy.
The pharmacokinetics of KALETRA soft gelatin capsule and
oral solution (Group 1: 400/100 mg/m² twice daily + 2 NRTIs; Group 2: 480/120 mg/m² twice daily +
≥ 1 NRTI + 1 NNRTI) have been evaluated in children and adolescents age ≥ 2 years to
< 18 years of age who had failed prior therapy (n=26) in Study 1038. KALETRA doses of 400/100 and 480/120
mg/m² resulted in high lopinavir exposure, as almost all subjects had lopinavir AUC12 above
100 μg•h/mL. Both groups of subjects also achieved relatively high average minimum lopinavir
concentrations.
KALETRA once-daily has not been evaluated in pediatric
patients.
Renal Impairment
Lopinavir pharmacokinetics have not been studied in patients
with renal impairment; however, since the renal clearance of lopinavir is negligible, a decrease
in total body clearance is not expected in patients with renal impairment.
Hepatic Impairment
Lopinavir is principally metabolized and eliminated by the liver. Multiple
dosing of KALETRA 400/100 mg twice-daily to HIV-1 and HCV co-infected patients
with mild to moderate hepatic impairment (n = 12) resulted in a 30% increase
in lopinavir AUC and 20% increase in Cmax compared to HIV-1 infected subjects
with normal hepatic function (n = 12). Additionally, the plasma protein binding
of lopinavir was statistically significantly lower in both mild and moderate
hepatic impairment compared to controls (99.09 vs. 99.31%, respectively). Caution
should be exercised when administering KALETRA to subjects with hepatic impairment.
KALETRA has not been studied in patients with severe hepatic impairment [See
WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS and Use
In Specific Populations].
Drug Interactions
KALETRA is an inhibitor of the P450 isoform CYP3A in vitro.
Co-administration of KALETRA and drugs primarily metabolized by CYP3A may result in increased
plasma concentrations of the other drug, which could increase or prolong its therapeutic and
adverse effects [See CONTRAINDICATIONS and DRUG INTERACTIONS].
KALETRA does not inhibit CYP2D6, CYP2C9, CYP2C19, CYP2E1,
CYP2B6 or CYP1A2 at clinically relevant concentrations.
KALETRA has been shown in vivo to induce its own metabolism
and to increase the biotransformation of some drugs metabolized by cytochrome
P450 enzymes and by glucuronidation.
KALETRA is metabolized by CYP3A. Drugs that induce CYP3A
activity would be expected to increase the clearance of lopinavir, resulting in lowered
plasma concentrations of lopinavir. Although not noted with concurrent ketoconazole, co-administration of
KALETRA and other drugs that inhibit CYP3A may increase lopinavir plasma concentrations.
Drug interaction studies were performed with KALETRA and other drugs likely
to be co-administered and some drugs commonly used as probes for pharmacokinetic
interactions. The effects of coadministration of KALETRA on the AUC, Cmax and
Cmin are summarized in Table 10 (effect of other drugs on lopinavir) and Table
11 (effect of KALETRA on other drugs). The effects of other drugs on ritonavir
are not shown since they generally correlate with those observed with lopinavir
(if lopinavir concentrations are decreased, ritonavir concentrations are decreased)
unless otherwise indicated in the table footnotes. For information regarding
clinical recommendations, see Table 9 in DRUG INTERACTIONS.
Table 10. Drug Interactions: Pharmacokinetic Parameters for
Lopinavir in the Presence of the Coadministered Drug for Recommended Alterations in Dose or Regimen
| Co-administered Drug |
Dose of Coadministered
Drug |
Dose of KALETRA
(mg) |
n |
Ratio (in combination with co-administered
drug/alone) of Lopinavir Pharmacokinetic Parameters (90% CI); No Effect
= 1.00 |
| Cmax |
AUC |
C min |
| Amprenavir |
750 BID, 10 d |
400/100 capsule BID, 21 d |
12 |
0.72 |
0.62 |
0.43 |
| (0.65,0.79) |
(0.56, 0.70) |
(0.34, 0.56) |
| Efavirenz1,10 |
600 QHS, 9 d |
400/100 capsule BID, 9 d |
11,7* |
0.97 |
0.81 |
0.61 |
| (0.78,1.22) |
(0.64, 1.03) |
(0.38, 0.97) |
| 600 QHS, 9 d |
500/125 tablet BID,10 d |
19 |
1.12 |
1.06 |
0.90 |
| (1.02,1.23) |
(0.96, 1.17) |
(0.78, 1.04) |
| 600 QHS, 9 d |
600/150 tablet BID, 10 d |
23 |
1.36 |
1.36 |
1.32 |
| (1.28,1.44) |
(1.28, 1.44) |
(1.21, 1.44) |
| Fosamprenavir2 |
700 BID plus ritonavir 100 BID, 14 d |
400/100 capsule BID, 14 d |
18 |
1.30 |
1.37 |
1.52 |
| (0.85,1.47) |
(0.80, 1.55) |
(0.72, 1.82) |
| Ketoconazole |
200 single dose |
400/100 capsule BID, 16 d |
12 |
0.89 |
0.87 |
0.75 |
| |
(0.80,0.99) |
(0.75, 1.00) |
(0.55, 1.00) |
| Nelfinavir |
1000 BID, 10 d |
400/100 capsule BID, 21 d |
13 |
0.79 |
0.73 |
0.62 |
| |
(0.70,0.89) |
(0.63, 0.85) |
(0.49, 0.78) |
| Nevirapine |
200 BID, steadystate ( > 1 yr)3 |
400/100 capsule BID, steady-state |
22,19* |
0.81 |
0.73 |
0.49 |
| (0.62,1.05) |
0.53, 0.98) |
(0.28, 0.74) |
| 7 mg/kg or 4 mg/kg QD, 2 wk; BID 1 wk4 |
(> 1 yr)3 00/75 mg/m² oral solution BID, 3 wk |
12,15* |
0.86 |
0.78 |
0.45 |
| (0.64,1.16) |
0.56, 1.09) |
(0.25, 0.81) |
| Omeprazole |
40 QD, 5 d |
400/100 tablet BID,10 d |
12 |
1.08 |
1.07 |
1.03 |
| (0.99,1.17) |
0.99, 1.15) |
(0.90, 1.18) |
| 40 QD, 5 d |
800/200 tablet QD,10 d |
12 |
0.94 |
0.92 |
0.71 |
| (0.88,1.00) |
0.86, 0.99) |
(0.57, 0.89) |
| Pravastatin |
20 QD, 4 d |
400/100 capsule BID, 14 d |
12 |
0.98 |
0.95 |
0.88 |
| (0.89,1.08) |
0.85, 1.05) |
(0.77, 1.02) |
| Rifabutin |
150 QD, 10 d |
400/100 capsule BID, 20 d |
14 |
1.08 |
1.17 |
1.20 |
| (0.97,1.19) |
1.04, 1.31) |
(0.96, 1.65) |
| Ranitidine |
150 single dose |
400/100 tablet BID,10 d |
12 |
0.99 |
0.97 |
0.90 |
| (0.95,1.03) |
0.93, 1.01) |
(0.85, 0.95) |
| 150 single dose |
800/200 tablet QD,10 d |
10 |
0.97 |
0.95 |
0.82 |
| (0.95,1.00) |
0.91, 0.99) |
(0.74, 0.91) |
| Rifampin |
600 QD,10 d |
400/100 capsule BID, 20 d |
22 |
0.45 |
0.25 |
0.01 |
| (0.40,0.51) |
0.21, 0.29) |
(0.01, 0.02) |
| 600 QD,14 d |
800/200 capsule BID, 9 d5 |
10 |
1.02 |
0.84 |
0.43 |
| (0.85,1.23) |
0.64, 1.10) |
(0.19, 0.96) |
| 600 QD,14 d |
400/400 capsule BID, 9 d6 |
9 |
0.93 |
0.98 |
1.03 |
| (0.81,1.07) |
0.81, 1.17) |
(0.68, 1.56) |
| |
|
|
|
|
Co-administration of KALETRA and rifampin is contraindicated.[See CONTRAINDICATIONS] |
| Ritonavir3 |
100 BID, 3-4 wk |
400/100 capsule BID,3-4 wk |
8,21* |
1.28 |
1.46 |
2.16 |
| (0.94,1.76) |
1.04, 2.06) |
(1.29, 3.62) |
| Tenofovir7 |
300 mg QD, 14 d |
400/100 capsule BID, 14 d |
24 |
NC† |
NC† |
NC† |
| Tipranavir/ritonavir3 |
500/200 mgBID (28 doses) |
400/100 capsule BID(27 doses) |
21 |
0.53 |
0.45 |
0.30 (0.17, 0.51)8 |
| 69 |
(0.40,0.69)8 |
(0.32, 0.63)8 |
0.48 (0.40, 0.58)9 |
All interaction studies conducted in healthy, HIV-1 negative subjects unless otherwise indicated.
1 The pharmacokinetics of ritonavir are unaffected by concurrent efavirenz.
2 Data extracted from the fosamprenavir package insert.
3 Study conducted in HIV-1 positive adult subjects.
4 Study conducted in HIV-1 positive pediatric subjects ranging in age from 6 months to 12 years.
5 Titrated to 800/200 BID as 533/133 BID x 1 d, 667/167 BID x 1 d, then 800/200 BID x 7 d, compared to 400/100 BID x 10 days alone.
6 Titrated to 400/400 BID as 400/200 BID x 1 d, 400/300 BID x 1 d, then 400/400 BID x 7 d, compared to 400/100 BID x 10 days alone.
7 Data extracted from the tenofovir package insert.
8 Intensive PK analysis.
9 Drug levels obtained at 8-16 hrs post-dose.
10 Reference for comparison is lopinavir/ritonavir 400/100 mg BID without efavirenz.
* Parallel group design; n for KALETRA + co-administered drug, n for KALETRA alone.
† NC = No change. |
Table 11. Drug Interactions: Pharmacokinetic Parameters for
co-administered Drug in the Presence of KALETRA for Recommended Alterations in Dose or Regimen
| Co-administered Drug |
Dose of Co-administered Drug (mg) | Dose of KALETRA (mg) |
n |
Ratio (in combination with KALETRA/alone)
of co-administered Drug Pharmacokinetic Parameters (90% CI); No Effect
= 1.00 |
| Cmax |
AUC |
Cmin |
| Amprenavir1 |
750 BID, 10 d combo vs. 1200 BID, 14 d alone |
400/100 capsule BID,21 d |
11 |
1.12 |
1.72 |
4.57 |
| (0.91, 1.39) |
(1.41, 2.09) |
(3.51, 5.95) |
| Desipramine2 |
100 single dose |
400/100 capsule BID,10 d |
15 |
0.91 |
1.05 |
N/A |
| (0.84, 0.97) |
(0.96, 1.16) |
|
| Efavirenz |
600 QHS, 9 d |
400/100 capsule BID, 9d |
11,12* |
0.91 |
0.84 |
0.84 |
| (0.72, 1.15) |
(0.62, 1.15) |
(0.58, 1.20) |
| Ethinyl Estradiol |
35 μg QD, 21 d (OrthoNovum®) |
400/100 capsule BID,14 d |
12 |
0.59 |
0.58 |
0.42 |
| (0.52, 0.66) |
(0.54, 0.62) |
(0.36, 0.49) |
| Fosamprenavir3 |
700 BID plus ritonavir 100 BID, 14 d |
400/100 capsule BID,14 d |
|
0.42 |
0.37 |
0.35 |
| (0.30, 0.58) |
(0.28, 0.49) |
(0.27, 0.46) |
| Indinavir1 |
600 BID, 10 d combo nonfasting vs. 800 TID, 5d alone fasting |
400/100 capsule BID,15 d |
|
0.71 |
0.91 |
3.47 |
| (0.63, 0.81) |
(0.75, 1.10) |
(2.60, 4.64) |
| Ketoconazole |
200 single dose |
400/100 capsule BID,16 d |
|
1.13 |
3.04 |
N/A |
| (0.91, 1.40) |
(2.44, 3.79) |
|
| Methadone |
5 single dose |
400/100 capsule BID,10 d |
|
0.55 |
0.47 |
N/A |
| (0.48, 0.64) |
(0.42, 0.53) |
|
| Nelfinavir1 |
1000 BID, 10 d combo vs. 1250 BID, 14 d alone |
400/100 capsule BID,21 d |
|
0.93 |
1.07 |
1.86 |
| (0.82, 1.05) |
(0.95, 1.19) |
(1.57, 2.22) |
| M8 metabolite |
|
|
|
2.36 |
3.46 |
7.49 |
| (1.91, 2.91) |
(2.78, 4.31) |
(5.85, 9.58) |
| Nevirapine |
200 QD, 14 d; BID, 6 d |
400/100 capsule BID,20 d |
|
1.05 |
1.08 |
1.15 |
| (0.72, 1.52) |
(0.72, 1.64) |
(0.71, 1.86) |
| Norethindrone |
1 QD, 21 d (Ortho Novum®) |
400/100 capsule BID,14 d |
|
0.84 |
0.83 |
0.68 |
| (0.75, 0.94) |
(0.73, 0.94) |
(0.54, 0.85) |
| Pravastatin |
20 QD, 4 d |
400/100 capsule BID,14 d |
|
1.26 |
1.33 |
N/A |
| (0.87, 1.83) |
(0.91, 1.94) |
|
| Rifabutin |
150 QD, 10 d; combo vs. 300 QD, 10 d; alone |
400/100 capsule BID,10 d |
|
2.12 |
3.03 |
4.90 |
| (1.89, 2.38) |
(2.79, 3.30) |
(3.18, 5.76) |
| 25-O-desacetyl rifabutin |
|
|
|
23.6 |
47.5 |
94.9 |
| (13.7, 25.3) |
(29.3, 51.8) |
(74.0, 122) |
| Rifabutin + 25-Odesacetyl rifabutin4 |
|
|
|
3.46 |
5.73 |
9.53 |
| (3.07, 3.91) |
(5.08, 6.46) |
(7.56, 12.01) |
| Rosuvastatin5 |
20 mg QD, 7 d |
400/100 tabletBID, 7 d |
|
4.66 |
2.08 |
1.04 |
| (3.4, 6.4) |
(1.66, 2.6) |
(0.9, 1.2) |
| Tenofovir6 |
300 mg QD, 14 d |
400/100 capsule BID,14 d |
|
NC† |
1.32 |
1.51 |
| (1.26, 1.38) |
(1.32, 1.66) |
All interaction studies conducted in healthy, HIV-1 negative subjects unless otherwise indicated.
1 Ratio of parameters for amprenavir, indinavir, and nelfinavir, are not normalized for dose.
2 Desipramine is a probe substrate for assessing effects on CYP2D6-mediated metabolism.
3 Data extracted from the fosamprenavir package insert.
4 Effect on the dose-normalized sum of rifabutin parent and 25-O -desacetyl rifabutin active metabolite.
5 Data extracted from the rosuvastatin package insert and results presented at the 2007 Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infection (Hoody, et al, abstract L-107, poster #564 ).
6 Data extracted from the tenofovir package insert.
* Parallel group design; n for KALETRA + co-administered drug, n for co-administered drug alone.
N/A = Not available.
† NC = No change. |
Microbiology
Mechanism of Action
Lopinavir, an inhibitor of the HIV-1 protease, prevents
cleavage of the Gag-Pol polyprotein, resulting in the production of immature, non-infectious viral
particles.
Antiviral Activity
The antiviral activity of lopinavir against laboratory HIV
strains and clinical HIV-1 isolates was evaluated in acutely infected lymphoblastic cell lines and
peripheral blood lymphocytes, respectively. In the absence of human serum, the mean 50% effective
concentration (EC50) values of lopinavir against five different HIV-1 subtype B laboratory strains
ranged from 10-27 nM (0.006-0.017 μg/mL, 1 μg/mL = 1.6 μM) and ranged from 4-11 nM
(0.003-0.007 μg/mL) against several HIV-1 subtype B clinical isolates (n = 6). In the presence of 50% human
serum, the mean EC50 values of lopinavir against these five HIV-1 laboratory strains ranged from 65-289
nM (0.04-0.18 μg/mL), representing a 7- to 11-fold attenuation. Combination antiviral drug
activity studies with lopinavir in cell cultures demonstrated additive to antagonistic activity with
nelfinavir and additive to synergistic activity with amprenavir, atazanavir, indinavir, saquinavir and
tipranavir. The EC50 values of lopinavir against three different HIV-2 strains ranged from 12-180 nM (0.008-113
μg/mL).
Resistance
HIV-1 isolates with reduced susceptibility to lopinavir have
been selected in cell culture. The presence of ritonavir does not appear to influence the selection of
lopinavir-resistant viruses in cell culture.
The selection of resistance to KALETRA in antiretroviral
treatment naïve patients has not yet been characterized. In a study of 653 antiretroviral treatment
naïve patients (Study 863), plasma viral isolates from each patient on treatment with plasma HIV-1
RNA > 400 copies/mL at Week 24, 32, 40 and/or 48 were analyzed. No evidence of resistance to
KALETRA was observed in 37 evaluable KALETRA-treated patients (0%). Evidence of genotypic
resistance to nelfinavir, defined as the presence of the D30N and/or L90M substitution in HIV-1
protease, was observed in 25/76 (33%) of evaluable nelfinavir-treated patients. The selection of
resistance to KALETRA in antiretroviral treatment naïve pediatric patients (Study 940) appears to be
consistent with that seen in adult patients (Study 863).
Resistance to KALETRA has been noted to emerge in patients
treated with other protease inhibitors prior to KALETRA therapy. In studies of 227 antiretroviral
treatment naïve and protease inhibitor experienced patients, isolates from 4 of 23 patients with
quantifiable ( > 400 copies/mL) viral RNA following treatment with KALETRA for 12 to 100 weeks displayed
significantly reduced susceptibility to lopinavir compared to the corresponding baseline viral
isolates. Three of these patients had previously received treatment with a single protease
inhibitor (indinavir, nelfinavir, or saquinavir) and one patient had received treatment with multiple protease
inhibitors (indinavir, ritonavir, and saquinavir). All four of these patients had at least 4
substitutions associated with protease inhibitor resistance immediately prior to KALETRA therapy. Following
viral rebound, isolates from these patients all contained additional substitutions, some of
which are recognized to be associated with protease inhibitor resistance. However, there are
insufficient data at this time to identify patterns of lopinavir-associated substitutions in isolates from patients
on KALETRA therapy. The assessment of these patterns is under study.
Cross-resistance - Preclinical Studies
Varying degrees of cross-resistance have been observed among
HIV-1 protease inhibitors. Little information is available on the cross-resistance of viruses
that developed decreased susceptibility to lopinavir during KALETRA therapy.
The antiviral activity in cell culture of lopinavir against
clinical isolates from patients previously treated with a single protease inhibitor was determined. Isolates
that displayed > 4-fold reduced susceptibility to nelfinavir (n = 13) and saquinavir (n = 4), displayed
< 4-fold reduced susceptibility to lopinavir. Isolates with > 4-fold reduced susceptibility to
indinavir (n = 16) and ritonavir (n = 3) displayed a mean of 5.7- and 8.3-fold reduced susceptibility to lopinavir,
respectively. Isolates from patients previously treated with two or more protease inhibitors showed greater
reductions in susceptibility to lopinavir, as described in the following paragraph.
Clinical Studies - Antiviral Activity of KALETRA in Patients
with Previous Protease Inhibitor Therapies
The clinical relevance of reduced susceptibility in cell
culture to lopinavir has been examined by assessing the virologic response to KALETRA therapy in
treatment-experienced patients, with respect to baseline viral genotype in three studies and
baseline viral phenotype in one study.
Virologic response to KALETRA has been shown to be affected by the presence
of three or more of the following amino acid substitutions in protease at baseline:
L10F/I/R/V, K20M/N/R, L24I, L33F, M36I, I47V, G48V, I54L/T/V, V82A/C/F/S/T,
and I84V. Table 12 shows the 48-week virologic response (HIV-1 RNA < 400
copies/mL) according to the number of the above protease inhibitor resistance
mutations at baseline in studies 888 and 765 [see Clinical Studies] and
study 957 (see below).
Table 12. Virologic Response (HIV-1 RNA < 400 copies/mL)
at Week 48 by Baseline KALETRA Susceptibility and by Number of Protease Substitutions
Associated with Reduced Response to KALETRA1
| Number of protease inhibitor substitutions at baseline1 |
Study 888 (Single protease inhibitor-experienced2,
NNRTI-naïve) n=130 |
Study 765 (Single protease inhibitor-experienced3,
NNRTI-naïve) n=56 |
Study 957 (Multiple protease inhibitor-experienced4,
NNRTI-naïve) n=50 |
| 0-2 |
76/103 (74%) |
34/45 (76%) |
19/20 (95%) |
| 3-5 |
13/26 (50%) |
8/11 (73%) |
18/26 (69%) |
| 6 or more |
0/1 (0%) |
n/a |
1/4 (25%) |
1 Substitutions considered in the analysis included L10F/I/R/V, K20M/N/R, L24I, L33F, M36I, I47V, G48V, I54L/T/V, V82A/C/F/S/T, and I84V.
2 43% indinavir, 42% nelfinavir, 10% ritonavir, 15% saquinavir.
3 41% indinavir, 38% nelfinavir, 4% ritonavir, 16% saquinavir.
4 86% indinavir, 54% nelfinavir, 80% ritonavir, 70% saquinavir. |
Virologic response to KALETRA therapy with respect to
phenotypic susceptibility to lopinavir at baseline was examined in Study 957. In this study 56
NNRTI-naïve patients with HIV-1 RNA > 1,000 copies/mL despite previous therapy with at least two
protease inhibitors selected from indinavir, nelfinavir, ritonavir, and saquinavir were randomized to
receive one of two doses of KALETRA in combination with efavirenz and nucleoside reverse
transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs). The EC50 values of lopinavir against the 56 baseline viral isolates ranged
from 0.5- to 96-fold the wild-type EC50 value. Fifty-five percent (31/56) of these baseline isolates
displayed > 4-fold reduced susceptibility to lopinavir. These 31 isolates had a median reduction in
lopinavir susceptibility of 18-fold. Response to therapy by baseline lopinavir susceptibility is shown in
Table 13.
Table 13. HIV-1 RNA Response at Week 48 by Baseline
Lopinavir Susceptibility1
| Lopinavir susceptibility2 at baseline |
HIV-1 RNA < 400 copies/mL (%) |
HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL (%) |
| < 10 fold |
25/27 (93%) |
22/27 (81%) |
| > 10 and < 40 fold |
11/15 (73%) |
9/15 (60%) |
| ≥ 40 fold |
2/8 (25%) |
2/8 (25%) |
1 Lopinavir susceptibility was determined by recombinant phenotypic technology performed by Virologic.
2 Fold change in susceptibility from wild type. |
Clinical Studies
Patients Without Prior Antiretroviral Therapy
Study 863: KALETRA twice-daily + stavudine + lamivudine
compared to nelfinavir three-times-daily + stavudine + lamivudine
Study 863 was a randomized, double-blind, multicenter trial
comparing treatment with KALETRA (400/100 mg twice-daily) plus stavudine and lamivudine
versus nelfinavir (750 mg three-times-daily) plus stavudine and lamivudine in 653 antiretroviral
treatment naïve patients. Patients had a mean age of 38 years (range: 19 to 84), 57% were Caucasian, and 80%
were male. Mean baseline CD4+ cell count was 259 cells/mm³ (range: 2 to 949 cells/mm³) and mean
baseline plasma HIV-1 RNA was 4.9 log10 copies/mL (range: 2.6 to 6.8 log10 copies/mL).
Treatment response and outcomes of randomized treatment are
presented in Table 14.
Table 14. Outcomes of Randomized Treatment Through Week 48
(Study 863)
| Outcome |
KALETRA+d4T+3TC
(N = 326) |
Nelfinavir+d4T+3TC
(N = 327) |
| Responder1 |
75% |
62% |
| Virologic failure2 |
9% |
25% |
| Rebound |
7% |
15% |
| Never suppressed through Week 48 |
2% |
9% |
| Death |
2% |
1% |
| Discontinued due to adverse events |
4% |
4% |
| Discontinued for other reasons3 |
10% |
8% |
1 Patients achieved and maintained confirmed HIV-1 RNA < 400 copies/mL through Week 48.
2 Includes confirmed viral rebound and failure to achieve confirmed < 400 copies/mL through Week 48.
3 Includes lost to follow-up, patient's withdrawal, non-compliance, protocol violation and other reasons. Overall discontinuation through Week 48, including patients who discontinued subsequent to virologic failure, was 17% in the KALETRA arm and 24% in the nelfinavir arm. |
Through 48 weeks of therapy, there was a statistically
significantly higher proportion of patients in the KALETRA arm compared to the nelfinavir arm with HIV-1 RNA
< 400 copies/mL (75% vs. 62%, respectively) and HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL (67% vs. 52%,
respectively). Treatment response by baseline HIV-1 RNA level subgroups is presented in Table 15.
Table 15. Proportion of Responders Through Week 48 by
Baseline Viral Load (Study 863)
| Baseline Viral Load (HIV-1 RNA copies/mL) |
KALETRA +d4T+3TC |
n |
Nelfinavir +d4T+3TC |
n |
| < 400 copies/mL1 |
< 50 copies/mL2 |
< 400 copies/mL1 |
< 50 copies/mL2 |
| < 30,000 |
74% |
71% |
82 |
79% |
72% |
87 |
| ≥ 30,000 to < 100,000 |
81% |
73% |
79 |
67% |
54% |
79 |
| ≥ 100,000 to < 250,000 |
75% |
64% |
83 |
60% |
47% |
72 |
| ≥ 250,000 |
72% |
60% |
82 |
44% |
33% |
89 |
1 Patients achieved and maintained confirmed HIV-1 RNA < 400 copies/mL through Week 48.
2 Patients achieved HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL at Week 48. |
Through 48 weeks of therapy, the mean increase from baseline
in CD4+ cell count was 207 cells/mm³ for the KALETRA arm and 195 cells/mm³ for the nelfinavir
arm.
Study 418: KALETRA once-daily + tenofovir DF + emtricitabine
compared to KALETRA twice-daily + tenofovir DF + emtricitabine
Study 418 was a randomized, open-label, multicenter trial
comparing treatment with KALETRA 800/200 mg once-daily plus tenofovir DF and emtricitabine
versus KALETRA 400/100 mg twice-daily plus tenofovir DF and emtricitabine in 190 antiretroviral
treatment naïve patients. Patients had a mean age of 39 years (range: 19 to 75), 54% were Caucasian, and
78% were male. Mean baseline CD4+ cell count was 260 cells/mm³ (range: 3 to 1006 cells/mm³)
and mean baseline plasma HIV-1 RNA was 4.8 log10 copies/mL (range: 2.6 to 6.4 log10 copies/mL).
Treatment response and outcomes of randomized treatment are
presented in Table 16.
Table 16. Outcomes of Randomized Treatment Through Week 48
(Study 418)
| Outcome |
KALETRA QD + TDF + FTC
(n = 115) |
KALETRA BID + TDF + FTC
(n = 75) |
| Responder1 |
71% |
65% |
| Virologic failure2 |
10% |
9% |
| Rebound |
6% |
5% |
| Never suppressed through Week 48 |
3% |
4% |
| Death |
0% |
1% |
| Discontinued due to adverse events |
12% |
7% |
| Discontinued for other reasons3 |
7% |
17% |
1 Patients achieved and maintained confirmed HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL through Week 48.
2 Includes confirmed viral rebound and failure to achieve confirmed < 50 copies/mL through Week 48.
3 Includes lost to follow-up, patient's withdrawal, non-compliance, protocol violation and other reasons. |
Through 48 weeks of therapy, 71% in the KALETRA once-daily
arm and 65% in the KALETRA twicedaily arm achieved and maintained HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL (95%
confidence interval for the difference, -7.6% to 19.5%). Mean CD4+cell count increases
at Week 48 were 185 cells/mm³ for the KALETRA once-daily arm and 196 cells/mm³ for the KALETRA
twice-daily arm.
Patients With Prior Antiretroviral Therapy
Study 888: KALETRA twice-daily + nevirapine + NRTIs compared
to investigator-selected protease inhibitor(s) + nevirapine + NRTIs
Study 888 was a randomized, open-label, multicenter trial
comparing treatment with KALETRA (400/100 mg twice-daily) plus nevirapine and nucleoside
reverse transcriptase inhibitors versus investigator-selected protease inhibitor(s) plus nevirapine
and nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors in 288 single protease inhibitor-experienced,
non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI)-naïve patients. Patients had a mean age of 40 years
(range: 18 to 74), 68% were Caucasian, and 86% were male. Mean baseline CD4+cell count
was 322 cells/mm³ (range: 10 to 1059 cells/mm³) and mean baseline plasma HIV-1 RNA was 4.1
log10 copies/mL (range: 2.6 to 6.0 log10 copies/mL).
Treatment response and outcomes of randomized treatment
through Week 48 are presented in Table 17.
Table 17. Outcomes of Randomized Treatment Through Week 48
(Study 888)
| Outcome |
KALETRA + nevirapine + NRTIs
(n = 148) |
Investigator-Selected Protease Inhibitor(s) + nevirapine + NRTIs
(n = 140) |
| Responder1 |
57% |
33% |
| Virologic failure2 |
24% |
41% |
| Rebound |
11% |
19% |
| Never suppressed through |
13% |
23% |
| Week 48 |
|
|
| Death |
1% |
2% |
| Discontinued due to adverse events |
5% |
11% |
| Discontinued for other reasons3 |
14% |
13% |
1 Patients achieved and maintained confirmed HIV-1 RNA < 400 copies/mL through Week 48.
2 Includes confirmed viral rebound and failure to achieve confirmed < 400 copies/mL through Week 48.
3 Includes lost to follow-up, patient's withdrawal, non-compliance, protocol violation and other reasons. |
Through 48 weeks of therapy, there was a statistically
significantly higher proportion of patients in the KALETRA arm compared to the investigator-selected protease
inhibitor(s) arm with HIV-1 RNA < 400 copies/mL (57% vs. 33%, respectively).
Through 48 weeks of therapy, the mean increase from baseline
in CD4+ cell count was 111 cells/mm³ for the KALETRA arm and 112 cells/mm³ for the
investigator-selected protease inhibitor(s) arm.
Other Studies Supporting Approval
Study 720: KALETRA twice-daily + stavudine + lamivudine
Study 765: KALETRA twice-daily + nevirapine + NRTIs
Study 720 (patients without prior antiretroviral therapy)
and study 765 (patients with prior protease inhibitor therapy) were randomized, blinded, multi-center
trials evaluating treatment with KALETRA at up to three dose levels (200/100 mg twice-daily [720 only],
400/100 mg twice-daily, and 400/200 mg twice-daily). In Study 720, all patients switched to 400/100
mg twice-daily between Weeks 48-72. Patients in study 720 had a mean age of 35 years, 70% were
Caucasian, and 96% were male, while patients in study 765 had a mean age of 40 years, 73% were
Caucasian, and 90% were male. Mean (range) baseline CD4+ cell counts for patients in study 720
and study 765 were 338 (3-918) and 372 (72-807) cells/mm³, respectively. Mean (range) baseline
plasma HIV-1 RNA levels for patients in study 720 and study 765 were 4.9 (3.3 to 6.3) and 4.0 (2.9
to 5.8) log10 copies/mL, respectively.
Through 360 weeks of treatment in study 720, the proportion
of patients with HIV-1 RNA < 400 ( < 50) copies/mL was 61% (59%) [n = 100]. Among patients completing
360 weeks of treatment with CD4+ cell count measurements [n=60], the mean (median) increase
in CD4+cell count was 501 (457) cells/mm³. Thirty-nine patients (39%) discontinued the study,
including 13 (13%) discontinuations due to adverse reactions and 1 (1%) death.
Through 144 weeks of treatment in study 765, the proportion
of patients with HIV-1 RNA < 400 ( < 50) copies/mL was 54% (50%) [n = 70], and the corresponding mean
increase in CD4+cell count was 212 cells/mm³. Twenty-seven patients (39%) discontinued the
study, including 5 (7%) discontinuations secondary to adverse reactions and 2 (3%) deaths.
Pediatric Studies
Study 1030 was an open-label, multicenter, dose-finding
trial evaluating the pharmacokinetic profile, tolerability, safety and efficacy of KALETRA oral solution
containing lopinavir 80 mg/mL and ritonavir 20 mg/mL at a dose of 300/75 mg/m² twice daily plus 2 NRTIs
in HIV-1 infected infants ≥ 14 days and < 6 months of age.
Ten infants, ≥ 14 days and < 6 wks of age, were
enrolled at a median (range) age of 5.7 (3.6-6.0) weeks and all completed 24 weeks. At entry, median (range)
HIV-1 RNA was 6.0 (4.7-7.2) log10 copies/mL. Seven of 10 infants had HIV-1 RNA < 400
copies/mL at Week 24. At entry, median (range) CD4+ percentage was 41 (16-59) with a median decrease of 1%
(95% CI: -10, 18) from baseline to week 24 in 6 infants with available data.
Twenty-one infants, between 6 weeks and 6 months of age, were
enrolled at a median (range) age of 14.7 (6.9-25.7) weeks and 19 of 21 infants completed 24
weeks. At entry, median (range) HIV RNA level was 5.8 (3.7-6.9) log10 copies/mL. Ten of 21 infants
had HIV RNA < 400 copies/mL at Week 24. At entry, the median (range) CD4+ percentage was 32 (11-54)
with a median increase of 4% (95% CI: -1, 9) from baseline to week 24 in 19 infants with available
data.
See CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY for pharmacokinetic results .
Study 940 was an open-label, multicenter trial evaluating
the pharmacokinetic profile, tolerability, safety and efficacy of KALETRA oral solution containing
lopinavir 80 mg/mL and ritonavir 20 mg/mL in 100 antiretroviral naïve (44%) and experienced (56%)
pediatric patients. All patients were nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor naïve. Patients were
randomized to either 230 mg lopinavir/57.5 mg ritonavir per m² or 300 mg lopinavir/75 mg
ritonavir per m². Naïve patients also received lamivudine and stavudine. Experienced patients
received nevirapine plus up to two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors.
Safety, efficacy and pharmacokinetic profiles of the two
dose regimens were assessed after three weeks of therapy in each patient. After analysis of these
data, all patients were continued on the 300 mg lopinavir/75 mg ritonavir per m² dose. Patients had a
mean age of 5 years (range 6 months to 12 years) with 14% less than 2 years. Mean baseline CD4+ cell
count was 838 cells/mm³ and mean baseline plasma HIV-1 RNA was 4.7 log10 copies/mL.
Through 48 weeks of therapy, the proportion of patients who
achieved and sustained an HIV-1 RNA < 400 copies/mL was 80% for antiretroviral naïve patients and
71% for antiretroviral experienced patients. The mean increase from baseline in CD4+cell count
was 404 cells/mm³ for antiretroviral naïve and 284 cells/mm³ for antiretroviral experienced
patients treated through 48 weeks. At 48 weeks, two patients (2%) had prematurely discontinued the
study. One antiretroviral naïve patient prematurely discontinued secondary to an adverse reaction,
while one antiretroviral experienced patient prematurely discontinued secondary to an HIV-1
related event.
Dose selection in pediatric patients was based on the
following:
- Among patients 14 days to 6 months of age receiving 300/75
mg/m² twice daily without nevirapine, plasma concentrations were lower than those
observed in adults or in older children. This dose resulted in HIV-1 RNA < 400 copies/mL
in 55% of patients (70% in those initiating treatment at < 6 weeks of age).
- Among patients 6 months to 12 years of age, the 230/57.5
mg/m² oral solution twice daily regimen without nevirapine and the 300/75 mg/m² oral
solution twice daily regimen with nevirapine provided lopinavir plasma concentrations similar
to those obtained in adult patients receiving the 400/100 mg twice daily regimen (without
nevirapine). These doses resulted in treatment benefit (proportion of patients with HIV-1 RNA
< 400 copies/mL) similar to that seen in the adult clinical trials.
- Among patients 12 to 18 years of age receiving 400/100
mg/m² or 480/120 mg/m² (with efavirenz) twice daily, plasma concentrations were 60-100%
higher than among 6 to 12 year old patients receiving 230/57.5 mg/m². Mean apparent
clearance was similar to that observed in adult patients receiving standard dose and in patients 6
to 12 years of age. Although changes in HIV-1 RNA in patients with prior treatment
failure were less than anticipated, the pharmacokinetic data supports use of similar dosing as in
patients 6 to 12 years of age, not to exceed the recommended adult dose.
- For all age groups, the body surface area dosing was
converted to body weight dosing using the actual patient dose.
Last updated on RxList: 4/27/2009