Pharmacokinetics
Absorption: Following oral administration, telithromycin reached maximal concentration
at about 1 hour (0.5 - 4 hours).
It has an absolute bioavailability of 57% in both young and elderly subjects.
The rate and extent of absorption are unaffected by food intake, thus KETEK
tablets can be given without regard to food.
In healthy adult subjects, peak plasma telithromycin concentrations of approximately
2µg/mL are attained at a median of 1 hour after an 800-mg oral dose.
Steady-state plasma concentrations are reached within 2 to 3 days of once daily
dosing with telithromycin 800 mg.
Following oral dosing, the mean terminal elimination half-life of telithromycin
is 10 hours.
The pharmacokinetics of telithromycin after administration of single and multiple
(7 days) once daily 800-mg doses to healthy adult subjects are shown in Table
1.
Table 1
| |
Mean (SD) |
| Parameter |
Single dose (n=18) |
Multiple dose (n=18) |
| Cmax (µg/mL) |
1.9 (0.80) |
2.27 (0.71) |
| Tmax (h)* |
1.0 (0.5-4.0) |
1.0 (0.5-3.0) |
| AUC(0-24) (µg•h/mL) |
8.25 (2.6) |
12.5 (5.4) |
| Terminal t½ (h) |
7.16 (1.3) |
9.81 (1.9) |
| C24h (mg/mL) |
0.03 (0.013) |
0.07 (0.051) |
* Median (min-max) values
SD=Standard deviation
Cmax=Maximum plasma concentration
Tmax=Time to Cmax
AUC=Area under concentration vs. time curve
t½=Terminal plasma half-life
C24h =Plasma concentration at 24 hours post-dose |
In a patient population, mean peak and trough plasma concentrations were 2.9µg/mL
(±1.55), (n=219) and 0.2 µg/mL (±0.22), (n=204), respectively,
after 3 to 5 days of KETEK 800 mg once daily.
Distribution: Total in vitro protein binding is approximately
60% to 70% and is primarily due to human serum albumin.
Protein binding is not modified in elderly subjects and in patients with hepatic
impairment.
The volume of distribution of telithromycin after intravenous infusion is 2.9
L/kg.
Telithromycin concentrations in bronchial mucosa, epithelial lining fluid,
and alveolar macrophages after 800 mg once daily dosing for 5 days in patients
are displayed in Table 2.
Table 2
| |
Hours
post-dose |
Mean concentration (µg/mL) |
Tissue/
Plasma
Ratio |
Tissue or
fluid |
Plasma |
| Bronchial mucosa |
2 |
3.88* |
1.86 |
2.11 |
| 12 |
1.41* |
0.23 |
6.33 |
| 24 |
0.78* |
0.08 |
12.11 |
| Epithelial lining fluid |
2 |
14.89 |
1.86 |
8.57 |
| 12 |
3.27 |
0.23 |
13.8 |
| 24 |
0.84 |
0.08 |
14.41 |
| Alveolar macrophages |
2 |
65 |
1.07 |
55 |
| 8 |
100 |
0.605 |
180 |
| 24 |
41 |
0.073 |
540 |
|
*Units in mg/kg |
Telithromycin concentration in white blood cells exceeds the concentration
in plasma and is eliminated more slowly from white blood cells than from plasma.
Mean white blood cell concentrations of telithromycin peaked at 72.1 µg/mL
at 6 hours, and remained at 14.1 µg/mL 24 hours after 5 days of repeated
dosing of 600 mg once daily. After 10 days, repeated dosing of 600 mg once daily,
white blood cell concentrations remained at 8.9 µg/mL 48 hours after the
last dose.
Metabolism: In total, metabolism accounts for approximately 70% of the dose.
In plasma, the main circulating compound after administration of an 800-mg radiolabeled
dose was parent compound, representing 56.7% of the total radioactivity. The
main metabolite represented 12.6% of the AUC of telithromycin. Three other plasma
metabolites were quantified, each representing 3% or less of the AUC of telithromycin.
It is estimated that approximately 50% of its metabolism is mediated by CYP
450 3A4 and the remaining 50% is CYP 450-independent.
Elimination: The systemically available telithromycin is eliminated
by multiple pathways as follows: 7% of the dose is excreted unchanged in feces
by biliary and/or intestinal secretion; 13% of the dose is excreted unchanged
in urine by renal excretion; and 37% of the dose is metabolized by the liver.
Special populations
Gender: There was no significant difference between males and females in mean
AUC, Cmax, and elimination half-life in two studies; one in 18 healthy
young volunteers (18 to 40 years of age) and the other in 14 healthy elderly
volunteers (65 to 92 years of age), given single and multiple once daily doses
of 800 mg of KETEK.
Hepatic insufficiency: In a single-dose study (800 mg) in 12 patients and a
multiple-dose study (800 mg) in 13 patients with mild to severe hepatic insufficiency
(Child Pugh Class A, B and C), the Cmax, AUC and t½ of telithromycin
were similar to those obtained in age- and sex-matched healthy subjects. In
both studies, an increase in renal elimination was observed in hepatically impaired
patients indicating that this pathway may compensate for some of the decrease
in metabolic clearance. No dosage adjustment is recommended due to hepatic impairment.
(See PRECAUTIONS, General and DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION.)
Renal insufficiency: In a multiple-dose study, 36 subjects with varying degrees
of renal impairment received 400 mg, 600 mg, or 800 mg KETEK once daily for
5 days. There was a 1.4-fold increase in Cmax,ss, and a 1.9-fold
increase in AUC (0-24)ss at 800 mg multiple doses in the severely
renally impaired group (CLCR < 30 mL/min) compared to healthy
volunteers. Renal excretion may serve as a compensatory elimination pathway
for telithromycin in situations where metabolic clearance is impaired. Patients
with severe renal impairment are prone to conditions that may impair their metabolic
clearance. Therefore, in the presence of severe renal impairment (CLCR
< 30 mL/min), a reduced dosage of KETEK is recommended. (See DOSAGE
AND ADMINISTRATION.)
In a single-dose study in patients with end-stage renal failure on hemodialysis
(n=10), the mean Cmax and AUC values were similar to normal healthy
subjects when KETEK was administered 2 hours post-dialysis. However, the effect
of dialysis on removing telithromycin from the body has not been studied.
Multiple insufficiency: The effects of co-administration of ketoconazole in
12 subjects (age 60 years), with impaired renal function were studied (CLCR=
24 to 80 mL/min). In this study, when severe renal insufficiency (CLCR
< 30 mL/min, n=2) and concomitant impairment of CYP 3A4 metabolism pathway
were present, telithromycin exposure (AUC (0-24)) was increased by approximately
4- to 5-fold compared with the exposure in healthy subjects with normal renal
function receiving telithromycin alone. In the presence of severe renal impairment
(CLCR < 30 mL/min), with coexisting hepatic impairment, a reduced
dosage of KETEK is recommended. (See PRECAUTIONS,
General and DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION.)
Geriatric: Pharmacokinetic data show that there is an increase of 1.4-fold
in exposure (AUC) in 20 patients ≥65 years of age with community acquired
pneumonia in a Phase III study, and a 2.0-fold increase in exposure (AUC) in
14 subjects ≥65 years of age as compared with subjects less than 65 years
of age in a Phase I study. No dosage adjustment is required based on age alone.
Drug-drug interactions
Studies were performed to evaluate the effect of CYP 3A4 inhibitors on telithromycin
and the effect of telithromycin on drugs that are substrates of CYP 3A4 and
CYP 2D6. In addition, drug interaction studies were conducted with several other
concomitantly prescribed drugs.
CYP 3A4 inhibitors
Itraconazole: A multiple-dose interaction study with itraconazole showed
that Cmax of telithromycin was increased by 22% and AUC by 54%.
Ketoconazole: A multiple-dose interaction study with ketoconazole showed
that Cmax of telithromycin was increased by 51% and AUC by 95%.
Grapefruit juice: When telithromycin was given with 240 mL of grapefruit
juice after an overnight fast to healthy subjects, the pharmacokinetics of telithromycin
were not affected.
CYP 3A4 substrates
Cisapride: Steady-state peak plasma concentrations of cisapride
(an agent with the potential to increase QT interval) were increased by 95%
when co-administered with repeated doses of telithromycin, resulting in significant
increases in QTc. (See CONTRAINDICATIONS.)
Simvastatin: When simvastatin was co-administered with telithromycin,
there was a 5.3-fold increase in simvastatin Cmax, an 8.9-fold increase
in simvastatin AUC, a 15-fold increase in the simvastatin active metabolite
Cmax, and a 12-fold increase in the simvastatin active metabolite
AUC. (See PRECAUTIONS.)
In another study, when simvastatin and telithromycin were administered 12 hours
apart, there was a 3.4-fold increase in simvastatin Cmax, a 4.0-fold
increase in simvastatin AUC, a 3.2-fold increase in the active metabolite Cmax,
and a 4.3-fold increase in the active metabolite AUC. (See PRECAUTIONS.)
Midazolam: Concomitant administration of telithromycin with intravenous
or oral midazolam resulted in 2- and 6-fold increases, respectively, in the
AUC of midazolam due to inhibition of CYP 3A4-dependent metabolism of midazolam.
(See PRECAUTIONS.)
CYP 2D6 substrates
Paroxetine: There was no pharmacokinetic effect on paroxetine when telithromycin
was co-administered.
Metoprolol: When metoprolol was co-administered with telithromycin,
there was an increase of approximately 38% on the Cmax and AUC of
metoprolol, however, there was no effect on the elimination half-life of metoprolol.
Telithromycin exposure is not modified with concomitant single-dose administration
of metoprolol. (See PRECAUTIONS, DRUG INTERACTIONS.)
Other drug interactions
Digoxin: The plasma peak and trough levels of digoxin were increased
by 73% and 21%, respectively, in healthy volunteers when co-administered with
telithromycin. However, trough plasma concentrations of digoxin (when equilibrium
between plasma and tissue concentrations has been achieved) ranged from 0.74
to 2.17 ng/mL. There were no significant changes in ECG parameters and no signs
of digoxin toxicity. (See PRECAUTIONS.)
Theophylline: When theophylline was co-administered with repeated
doses of telithromycin, there was an increase of approximately 16% and 17% on
the steady-state Cmax and AUC of theophylline. Co-administration
of theophylline may worsen gastrointestinal side effects such as nausea and
vomiting, especially in female patients. It is recommended that telithromycin
should be taken with theophylline 1 hour apart to decrease the likelihood of
gastrointestinal side effects.
Sotalol: Telithromycin has been shown to decrease the Cmax
and AUC of sotalol by 34% and 20%, respectively, due to decreased absorption.
Warfarin: When co-administered with telithromycin in healthy subjects,
there were no pharmacodynamic or pharmacokinetic effects on racemic warfarin.
Oral contraceptives: When oral contraceptives containing ethinyl estradiol
and levonorgestrel were co-administered with telithromycin, the steady-state
AUC of ethinyl estradiol did not change and the steady-state AUC of levonorgestrel
was increased by 50%. The pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic study showed that
telithromycin did not interfere with the antiovulatory effect of oral contraceptives
containing ethinyl estradiol and levonorgestrel.
Ranitidine, antacid: There was no clinically relevant pharmacokinetic
interaction of ranitidine or antacids containing aluminum and magnesium hydroxide
on telithromycin.
Rifampin: During concomitant administration of rifampin and KETEK
in repeated doses, Cmax and AUC of telithromycin were dereased by
79%, and 86%, respectively. (See PRECAUTIONS, DRUG INTERACTIONS.)
Microbiology
Telithromycin belongs to the ketolide class of antibacterials and is structurally
related to the macrolide family of antibiotics. Telithromycin concentrates in
phagocytes where it exhibits activity against intracellular respiratory pathogens.
In vitro, telithromycin has been shown to demonstrate concentration-dependent
bactericidal activity against isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae (including
multi-drug resistant isolates [MDRSP*]).
*MDRSP=Multi-drug resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae includes isolates
known as PRSP (penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae), and are
isolates resistant to two or more of the following antimicrobials: penicillin,
2nd generation cephalosporins (e.g., cefuroxime), macrolides, tetracyclines,
and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole.
Mechanism of action
Telithromycin blocks protein synthesis by binding to domains II and V of 23S
rRNA of the 50S ribosomal subunit. By binding at domain II, telithromycin retains
activity against gram-positive cocci (e.g., Streptococcus pneumoniae)
in the presence of resistance mediated by methylases (erm genes) that
alter the domain V binding site of telithromycin. Telithromycin may also inhibit
the assembly of nascent ribosomal units.
Mechanism of resistance
Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus pyogenes with the constitutive
macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin B (cMLSB) phenotype are resistant
to telithromycin.
Mutants of Streptococcus pneumoniae derived in the laboratory by serial
passage in subinhibitory concentrations of telithromycin have demonstrated resistance
based on L22 riboprotein mutations (telithromycin MICs are elevated but still
within the susceptible range), one of two reported mutations affecting the L4
riboprotein, and production of K-peptide. The clinical significance of these
laboratory mutants is not known.
Cross resistance
Telithromycin does not induce resistance through methylase gene expression
in erythromycin-inducibly resistant bacteria, a function of its 3-keto moiety.
Telithromycin has not been shown to induce resistance to itself.
List of Microorganisms
Telithromycin has been shown to be active against most strains of the following
microorganisms, both in vitro and in clinical settings as described in
the INDICATIONS AND USAGE section.
Aerobic gram-positive microorganisms
Streptococcus pneumoniae (including multi-drug resistant isolates [MDRSP*])
*MDRSP=Multi-drug resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae includes isolates
known as PRSP (penicillin-resistant S. pneumoniae), and are isolates
resistant to two or more of the following antimicrobials: penicillin, 2nd
generation cephalosporins (e.g., cefuroxime), macrolides, tetracyclines, and
trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole.
Haemophilus influenzae
Moraxella catarrhalis
Other microorganisms
Chlamydophila (Chlamydia) pneumoniae
Mycoplasma pneumoniae
The following in vitro data are available, but their clinical
significance is unknown.
At least 90% of the following microorganisms exhibit in vitro minimum
inhibitory concentrations (MICs) less than or equal to the susceptible breakpoint
for telithromycin. However, the safety and efficacy of telithromycin in treating
clinical infections due to these microorganisms have not been established in
adequate and well-controlled clinical trials.
Aerobic gram-positive microorganisms
Staphylococcus aureus (methicillin and erythromycin susceptible isolates
only)
Streptococcus pyogenes (erythromycin susceptible isolates only)
Streptococci (Lancefield groups C and G)
Other microorganisms
Legionella pneumophila
Susceptibility Test Methods
When available, the clinical microbiology laboratory should provide cumulative
results of in vitro susceptibility test results for antimicrobial drugs
used in local hospitals and practice areas to the physician as periodic reports
that describe the susceptibility profile of nosocomial and community-acquired
pathogens. These reports should aid the physician in selecting the most effective
antimicrobial.
Dilution techniques
Quantitative methods are used to determine antimicrobial minimum inhibitory
concentrations (MICs). These MICs provide estimates of the susceptibility of
bacteria to antibacterial compounds. The MICs should be determined using a standardized
procedure. Standardized procedures are based on dilution methods (broth or agar
dilution)1,3 or equivalent with standardized inoculum and concentrations
of telithromycin powder. The MIC values should be interpreted according to criteria
provided in Table 3.
Diffusion techniques:
Quantitative methods that require measurement of zone diameters also provide
reproducible estimates of the susceptibility of bacteria to antibiotics. One
such standardized procedure2,3 requires the use of standardized inoculum
concentrations. This procedure uses paper disks impregnated with 15 g telithromycin
to test the susceptibility of microorganisms to telithromycin. Disc diffusion
zone sizes should be interpreted according to criteria in Table 3.
Table 3. Susceptibility Test Result Interpretive Criteria for
Telithromycin
| |
Minimal Inhibitory
Concentrations
(µg/mL) |
Disk Diffusion
(zone diameters in mm) |
| Pathogen |
S |
I |
R |
S |
I |
R |
| Streptococcus pneumoniae |
≤ 1 |
2 |
≥ 4 |
≥ 19 |
16-18 |
≤15 |
| Haemophilus influenzae |
≤4 |
8 |
≥ 16 |
≥ 15 |
12-14 |
≤ 11 |
A report of "Susceptible" indicates that the antimicrobial is likely
to inhibit growth of the pathogen if the antibacterial compound in the blood
reaches the concentrations usually achievable. A report of "Intermediate"
indicates that the result should be considered equivocal, and, if the microorganism
is not fully susceptible to alternative, clinically feasible drugs, the test
should be repeated. This category implies possible clinical applicability in
body sites where the drug is physiologically concentrated or in situations where
high dosage of drug can be used. This category also provides a buffer zone that
prevents small uncontrolled technical factors from causing major discrepancies
in interpretation. A report of "Resistant" indicates that the antimicrobial
is not likely to inhibit growth of the pathogen if the antimicrobial compound
in the blood reaches the concentrations usually achievable; other therapy should
be selected.
Quality control
Standardized susceptibility test procedures require the use of quality control
microorganisms to determine the performance of the test procedures1,2,3.
Standard telithromycin powder should provide the MIC ranges for the quality
control organisms in Table 4. For the disk diffusion technique, the 15-µg
telithromycin disk should provide the zone diameter ranges for the quality control
organisms in Table 4.
Table 4. Acceptable Quality Control Ranges for Telithromycin
| QC Strain |
Minimum Inhibitory
Concentrations
(µg/mL) |
Disk Diffusion
(Zone diameter in mm) |
Streptococcus pneumoniae
ATCC 49619 |
0.004-0.03 |
27-33 |
Haemophilus influenzae
ATCC 49247 |
1.0-4.0 |
17-23 |
| ATCC = American Type Culture Collection |
Clinical Studies
Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP)
KETEK was studied in four randomized, double-blind, controlled studies and
four open-label studies for the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia. Patients
with mild to moderate CAP who were considered appropriate for oral outpatient
treatment were enrolled in these trials. Patients with severe pneumonia were
excluded based on any one of the following: ICU admission, need for parenteral
antibiotics, respiratory rate > 30/minute, hypotension, altered mental status,
< 90% oxygen saturation by pulse oximetry, or white blood cell count <
4000/mm³. Total number of clinically evaluable patients in the telithromycin
group included 2016 patients.
Table 6. CAP: Clinical cure rate at post-therapy follow-up (17-24
days)
| |
Patients (n) |
Clinical cure rate |
| Controlled Studies |
KETEK |
Comparator |
KETEK |
Comparator |
KETEK vs. clarithromycin 500 mg
BID for 10 days |
162 |
156 |
88.3% |
88.5% |
KETEK vs. trovafloxacin* 200 mg QD
for 7 to 10 days |
80 |
86 |
90.0% |
94.2% |
KETEK vs. amoxicillin 1000 mg TID
for 10 days |
149 |
152 |
94.6% |
90.1% |
KETEK for 7 days vs. clarithromycin
500 mg BID for 10 days |
161 |
146 |
88.8% |
91.8% |
|
*This study was stopped prematurely after trovafloxacin
was restricted for use in hospitalized patients with severe infection. |
Clinical cure rates by pathogen from the four CAP controlled clinical trials
in microbiologically evaluable patients given KETEK for 7-10 days or a comparator
are displayed in Table 7.
Table 7. CAP: Clinical cure rate by pathogen at post-therapy
follow-up (17-24 days)
| Pathogen |
KETEK |
Comparator |
| Streptococcus pneumoniae |
73/78 (93.6%) |
63/70 (90.0%) |
| Haemophilus influenzae |
39/47 (83.0%) |
42/44 (95.5%) |
| Moraxella catarrhalis |
12/14 (85.7%) |
7/9 (77.8%) |
Chlamydophila (Chlamydia)
pneumoniae |
23/25 (92.0%) |
18/19 (94.7%) |
| Mycoplasma pneumoniae |
22/23 (95.7%) |
20/22 (90.9%) |
Clinical cure rates for patients with CAP due to Streptococcus pneumoniae
were determined from patients in controlled and uncontrolled trials. Of 333
evaluable patients with CAP due to Streptococcus pneumoniae, 312 (93.7%)
achieved clinical success. Only patients considered appropriate for oral outpatient
therapy were included in these trials. More severely ill patients were not enrolled.
Blood cultures were obtained in all patients participating in the clinical trials
of mild to moderate community-acquired pneumonia. In a limited number of outpatients
with incidental pneumococcal bacteremia treated with KETEK, a clinical cure
rate of 88% (67/76) has been observed. KETEK is not indicated for the treatment
of severe community-acquired pneumonia or suspected pneumococcal bacteremia.
Clinical cure rates for patients with CAP due to multi-drug resistant Streptococcus
pneumoniae (MDRSP*) were determined from patients in controlled and uncontrolled
trials. Of 36 evaluable patients with CAP due to MDRSP, 33 (91.7%) achieved
clinical success.
*MDRSP: Multi-drug resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae includes
isolates known as PRSP (penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae),
and are isolates resistant to two or more of the following antibiotics: penicillin,
2nd generation cephalosporins, e.g., cefuroxime, macrolides, tetracyclines
and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole.
Table 8. Clinical cure rate for 36 evaluable patients with MDRSP
treated with KETEK in studies of community-acquired pneumonia
Screening
Susceptibility |
Clinical Success in Evaluable MDRSP
Patients |
| |
n/Na |
% |
| Penicillin-resistant |
20/23 |
86.9 |
2nd generation
cephalosporin-resistant |
20/22 |
90.9 |
| Macrolide-resistant |
25/28 |
89.3 |
Trimethoprim/
sulfamethoxazole-resistant |
24/27 |
88.9 |
| Tetracycline-resistantb |
11/13 |
84.6 |
a n = the number of patients successfully
treated; N = the number with resistance to the listed drug of the 36
evaluable patients with CAP due to MDRSP.
b Includes isolates tested for resistance to either tetracycline
or doxycycline. |
Visual Adverse Events
Table 9 provides the incidence of all treatment-emergent visual adverse events
in controlled Phase III studies by age and gender. The group with the highest
incidence was females under the age of 40, while males over the age of 40 had
rates of visual adverse events similar to comparator-treated patients.
Table 9. Incidence of All Treatment-Emergent Visual Adverse
Events in Controlled Phase III Studies
| Gender/Age |
Telithromycin |
Comparators* |
Female
≤ 40 |
2.1%
(14/682) |
0.0%
(0/534) |
Female
>40 |
1.0%
(7/703) |
0.35%
(2/574) |
Male
≤ 40 |
1.2%
(7/563) |
0.48%
(2/417) |
Male
>40 |
0.27%
(2/754) |
0.33%
(2/614) |
| Total |
1.1%
(30/2702) |
0.28%
(6/2139) |
|
* Includes all comparators combined |
Animal Pharmacology
Repeated dose toxicity studies of 1, 3, and 6 months' duration with telithromycin
conducted in rat, dog and monkey showed that the liver was the principal target
for toxicity with elevations of liver enzymes and histological evidence of damage.
There was evidence of reversibility after cessation of treatment. Plasma exposures
based on free fraction of drug at the no observed adverse effect levels ranged
from 1 to 10 times the expected clinical exposure.
Phospholipidosis (intracellular phospholipid accumulation) affecting a number
of organs and tissues (e.g., liver, kidney, lung, thymus, spleen, gall bladder,
mesenteric lymph nodes, GI-tract) has been observed with the administration
of telithromycin in rats at repeated doses of 900 mg/m²/day (1.8x the human
dose) or more for 1 month, and 300 mg/m²/day (0.61x the human dose) or
more for 3-6 months. Similarly, phospholipidosis has been observed in dogs with
telithromycin at repeated doses of 3000 mg/m²/day (6.1x the human dose)
or more for 1 month and 1000 mg/m²/day (2.0x the human dose) or more for
3 months. The significance of these findings for humans is unknown.
Pharmacology/toxicology studies showed an effect both in prolonging QTc interval
in dogs in vivo and in vitro action potential duration (APD) in
rabbit Purkinje fibers. These effects were observed at concentrations of free
drug at least 8.8 (in dogs) times those circulating in clinical use. In vitro
electrophysiological studies (hERG assays) suggested an inhibition of the rapid
activating component of the delayed rectifier potassium current (IKr)
as an underlying mechanism.
References
- National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. Methods for Dilution
Antimicrobial Susceptibility Tests for Bacteria That Grow Aerobically - Sixth
Edition; Approved Standard, NCCLS Document M7-A6, Vol. 23, No. 2, NCCLS, Wayne,
PA, January, 2003.
- National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. Performance Standards
for Antimicrobial Disk Susceptibility Tests - Eighth Edition; Approved Standard,
NCCLS Document M2-A8, Vol. 23, No. 1, NCCLS, Wayne, PA, January, 2003.
- National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. Performance Standards
for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing: Twelfth Informational Supplement;
Approved Standard, NCCLS Document M2-A8 and M7-A6, Vol. 23, No. 1, NCCLS, Wayne,
PA, January, 2004.
Last updated on RxList: 3/20/2007