The incidence of adverse reactions
reported in studies involving postmenopausal osteoporotic patients chronically
exposed to Miacalcin® (calcitonin-salmon) Nasal Spray (N=341) and to placebo
nasal spray (N=131) and reported in greater than 3% of Miacalcin Nasal
Spray-treated patients are presented below in the following table. Most adverse
reactions were mild to moderate in severity. Nasal adverse events were most
common with 70% mild, 25% moderate, and 5% severe in nature (placebo rates were
71% mild, 27% moderate, and 2% severe).
Adverse Reactions Occurring in at
Least 3% of Postmenopausal Patients Treated Chronically Miacalcin®
(calcitonin-salmon)
| Adverse Reaction |
Nasal Spray
N=341% of
Patients |
Placebo
N=131% of
Patients |
| Rhinitis |
12 |
6.9 |
| Symptom of Nose† |
10.6 |
16 |
| Back Pain |
5 |
2.3 |
| Arthralgia |
3.8 |
5.3 |
| Epistaxis |
3.5 |
4.6 |
| Headache |
3.2 |
4.6 |
| † Symptom of nose includes: nasal crusts, dryness, redness or erythema, nasal sores, irritation, itching, thick feeling, soreness, pallor, infection, stenosis, runny/block ed, small wound, bleeding wound, tenderness, uncomfortable feeling and sore across bridge of nose. |
In addition, the following adverse
events were reported in fewer than 3% of patients during chronic therapy with
Miacalcin® Nasal Spray. Adverse events reported in 1%-3% of patients are
identified with an asterisk(*). The remainder occurred in less than 1% of
patients. Other than flushing, nausea, possible allergic reactions, and
possible local irritative effects in the respiratory tract, a relationship to
Miacalcin® Nasal Spray has not been established.
Body as a Whole – General Disorders: influenza-like symptoms*, fatigue*,
periorbital edema, fever
Integumentary:erythematous rash*, skin
ulceration, eczema, alopecia, pruritus, increased sweating
Musculoskeletal/Collagen: arthrosis*, myalgia*, arthritis,
polymyalgia rheumatica, stiffness
Respiratory/Special Senses: sinusitis*, upper respiratory tract infection*, bronchospasm*, pharyngitis, bronchitis, pneumonia, coughing,
dyspnea, taste perversion, parosmia
Cardiovascular: hypertension*, angina pectoris*,
tachycardia, palpitation, bundle branch block, myocardial infarction
Gastrointestinal:dyspepsia*, constipation*,
abdominal pain*, nausea*, diarrhea*, vomiting, flatulence, increased appetite,
gastritis, dry mouth
Liver/Metabolic:cholelithiasis, hepatitis, thirst,
weight increase
Endocrine: goiter, hyperthyroidism
Urinary System: cystitis*, pyelonephritis,
hematuria, renal calculus
Central and Peripheral Nervous
System:
dizziness*, paresthesia*, vertigo, migraine, neuralgia, agitation
Hearing/Vestibular:tinnitus, hearing loss, earache
Vision:abnormal lacrimation*,
conjunctivitis*, blurred vision, vitreous floater
Vascular:flushing,cerebrovascular accident,
thrombophlebitis
Hematologic/Resistance Mechanisms: lymphadenopathy*, infection*,
anemia
Psychiatric:depression*, insomnia, anxiety,
anorexia
Common adverse reactions associated
with the use of injectable calcitonin-salmon occurred less frequently in
patients treated with Miacalcin Nasal Spray than in those patients treated with
injectable calcitonin. Nausea, with or without vomiting, which occurred in 1.8%
of patients treated with the nasal spray (and 1.5% of those receiving placebo
nasal spray) occurs in about 10% of patients who take injectable
calcitonin-salmon. Flushing, which occurred in less than 1% of patients treated
with the nasal spray, occurs in 2%-5% of patients treated with injectable
calcitonin-salmon. Although the administered dosages of injectable and nasal
spray calcitonin-salmon are comparable (50-100 units daily of injectable versus
200 units daily of nasal spray), the nasal dosage form has a mean
bioavailability of about 3% (range 0.3%-30.6%) and therefore provides less drug
to the systemic circulation, possibly accounting for the decrease in frequency
of adverse reactions.
The collective foreign marketing experience
with Miacalcin Nasal Spray does not show evidence of any notable difference in
the incidence profile of reported adverse reactions when compared with that
seen in the clinical trials.