home > drugs a-z list > noxafil (posaconazole oral suspension) drug center > noxafil (posaconazole oral suspension) drug - clinical pharmacology

Recommended Topic Related To:

Noxafil

What is yeast?

Yeast is a fungus scientifically referred to as Candida. The specific type of fungus most commonly responsible for vaginitis is Candida albicans. Yeast is commonly present on normal human skin and in areas of moisture, such as the mouth and vagina. In fact, it is estimated that between 20%-50% of healthy women normally carry yeast in the vaginal area.

What is vaginitis?

Vaginitis is inflammation of the vagina. Vaginitis is very common and is reported by as many as 75% of women at some point in their lives. Vaginitis can be caused by a number of infections, including bacteria (such as Gardnerella and gonorrhea), protozoans (such as trichomonas), and yeast (Candida). Vaginal yeast infection, which is the most common form of vaginitis, is often referred to as vaginal Candidiasis.

What is vulvitis?

Vulvitis is inflammation of the external ...

Noxafil

font size

CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY

Mechanism of Action

Posaconazole is a triazole antifungal agent.

Pharmacodynamics

Exposure Response Relationship

In clinical studies of immunocompromised patients, a wide range of plasma exposures to posaconazole was noted. A pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic analysis of patient data revealed an apparent association between average posaconazole concentrations (Cav) and prophylactic efficacy. A lower Cav may be associated with an increased risk of treatment failure [defined in the study as treatment discontinuation, use of empiric systemic antifungal therapy (SAF), or invasive fungal infections (IFI)].

To enhance the oral absorption of posaconazole and optimize plasma concentrations:

  • Each dose of NOXAFIL (posaconazole oral suspension) should be administered during or immediately (i.e. within 20 minutes) following a full meal. In patients who cannot eat a full meal, each dose of NOXAFIL (posaconazole oral suspension) should be administered with a liquid nutritional supplement or an acidic carbonated beverage. For patients who cannot eat a full meal or tolerate an oral nutritional supplement or an acidic carbonated beverage, alternative antifungal therapy should be considered or patients should be monitored closely for breakthrough fungal infections.
  • Patients who have severe diarrhea or vomiting should be monitored closely for breakthrough fungal infections.
  • Co-administration of drugs that can decrease the plasma concentrations of posaconazole should generally be avoided unless the benefit outweighs the risk. If such drugs are necessary, patients should be monitored closely for breakthrough fungal infections [see DRUG INTERACTIONS].

Pharmacokinetics

Absorption

In clinical studies of immunocompromised patients, a wide range of plasma exposures to posaconazole was noted. A pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic analysis of patient data revealed an apparent association between average posaconazole concentrations (Cav) and prophylactic efficacy. A lower Cav may be associated with an increased risk of treatment failure [defined in the study as treatment discontinuation, use of empiric systemic antifungal therapy (SAF), or invasive fungal infections (IFI)].

Posaconazole is absorbed with a median Tmax of ~3 to 5 hours. Dose proportional increases in plasma exposure (AUC) to posaconazole were observed following single oral doses from 50 mg to 800 mg and following multiple-dose administration from 50 mg BID to 400 mg BID. No further increases in exposure were observed when the dose was increased from 400 mg BID to 600 mg BID in febrile neutropenic patients or those with refractory invasive fungal infections. Steady-state plasma concentrations are attained at 7 to 10 days following multiple-dose administration.

Following single-dose administration of 200 mg, the mean AUC and Cmax of posaconazole are approximately 3 times higher when administered with a nonfat meal and approximately 4 times higher when administered with a high-fat meal (~50 gm fat) relative to the fasted state. Following single dose administration of 400 mg, the mean AUC and Cmax of posaconazole are approximately 3 times higher when administered with a liquid nutritional supplement (14 gm fat) relative to the fasted state (see Table 8). In order to assure attainment of adequate plasma concentrations, it is recommended to administer posaconazole with food or a nutritional supplement.

TABLE 8: The Mean (%CV) [min-max] Posaconazole Pharmacokinetic Parameters Following Single-Dose Suspension Administration of 200 mg and 400 mg Under Fed and Fasted Conditions

Dose (mg) Cmax
(ng/mL)
Tmax*
(hr)
AUC (I)
(ng•hr/mL)
CL/F
(L/hr)

(hr)
200 mg fasted (n=20) ‡ 132 (50)
[45-267]
3.50
[1.5-36†]
4179 (31)
[2705-7269]
51 (25)
[28-74]
23.5 (25)
[15.3-33.7]
200 mg nonfat (n=20) ‡ 378 (43)
[131-834]
4 [3-5] 10,753 (35)
[4579-17,092]
21 (39)
[12-44]
22.2 (18)
[17.4-28.7]
200 mg high fat (54 gm fat)‡ (n=20) 512 (34)
[241-1016]
5 [4-5] 15,059 (26)
[10,341-24,476]
14 (24)
[8.2-19]
23.0 (19)
[17.2-33.4]
400 mg fasted (n=23) § 121 (75)
[27-366]
4 [2-12] 5258 (48)
[2834-9567]
91 (40)
[42-141]
27.3 (26)
[16.8-38.9]
400 mg with liquid nutritional supplement (14 gm fat) (n=23)§ 355 (43)
[145-720]
5 [4-8] 11,295 (40)
[3865-20,592]
43 (56)
[19-103]
26.0 (19)
[18.2-35.0]
* Median [min-max]
† The subject with Tmax of 36 hrs had relatively constant plasma levels over 36 hrs (1.7 ng/mL difference between 4 hrs and 36 hrs).
‡ n=15 for AUC (I), CL/F, and t ½
§ n=10 for AUC (I), CL/F, and tfrac12;

Table 9: The Effect of Varying Gastric Administration Conditions on the Cmax and AUC of Posaconazole in Healthy Volunteers

Study Description Administration Arms Change in Cmax (ratio estimate**; 90% CI of the ratio estimate) Change in AUC (ratioestimate**; 90% CI of the ratio estimate)
400-mg single dose with a high-fat meal relativeto fasted state (n=12) 5 minutes before high-fat meal ↑96%
(1.96; 1.48­2.59)
↑111%
(2.11; 1.60­2.78)
During high-fat meal ↑339%
(4.39; 3.32­5.80)
↑382%
(4.82; 3.66­6.35)
20 minutes after high-fat meal ↑333%
(4.33; 3.28­5.73)
↑387%
(4.87; 3.70­6.42)
  400 mg BID with BOOST ↑65%
(1.65; 1.29­2.11)
↑66%
(1.66; 1.30­2.13)
400 mg BID and 200 mg QID for 7 days in fasted state and with liquid nutritional supplement (BOOST®) (n=12)
200 mg QID with BOOST No Effect No Effect
Divided daily dose from 400 mg BID to 200 mg QID for 7 days regardless of fasted conditions or with BOOST (n=12) Fasted state ↑136%
(2.36; 1.84­3.02)
↑161%
(2.61; 2.04­3.35)
With BOOST ↑137%
(2.37; 1.86­3.04)
↑157%
(2.57; 2.00­3.30)
400-mg single dose with carbonated acidic beverage (ginger ale) and/or proton pump inhibitor (esomeprazole) (n=12) Ginger ale ↑92%
(1.92; 1.51­2.44)
↑70%
(1.70; 1.43­2.03)
Esomeprazole ↓32%
(0.68; 0.53­0.86)
↓30%
(0.70; 0.59­0.83)
400-mg single dose with a prokinetic agent (metoclopramide 10 mg TID for 2 days) + BOOST or a antikinetic agent (loperamide 4- mg single dose) + BOOST (n=12) With metoclopramide + BOOST ↓21%
(0.79; 0.72­0.87)
↓19%
(0.81; 0.72­0.91)
With loperamide + BOOST ↓3%
(0.97; 0.88­1.07)
↑11%
(1.11; 0.99­1.25)
400-mg single dose either orally with BOOST or via an NG tube with BOOST (n=16) Via NG tube* ↓19%
(0.81; 0.71­0.91)
↓23%
(0.77; 0.69­0.86)
*In 5 subjects, the Cmax and AUC decreased substantially (range: -27% to -53% and -33% to -51%, respectively) when NOXAFIL (posaconazole oral suspension) was administered via an NG tube compared to when NOXAFIL (posaconazole oral suspension) was administered orally. It is recommended to closely monitor patients for breakthrough fungal infections when NOXAFIL (posaconazole oral suspension) is administered via an NG tube because a lower plasma exposure may be associated with an increase risk of treatment failure.
**Ratio Estimate is the ratio of co-administered drug plus posaconazole to co-administered drug alone for Cmax or AUC.

The mean (%CV) [min-max] posaconazole average steady-state plasma concentrations (Cav) and steady-state pharmacokinetic parameters in patients following administration of 200 mg TID and 400 mg BID of the oral suspension are provided in Table 10.

TABLE 10: The Mean (%CV) [min-max] Posaconazole Steady-State Pharmacokinetic Parameters in Patients Following Oral Administration of Posaconazole 200 mg TID and 400 mg BID

Dose* Cav (ng/mL) AUC|| (ng•hr/mL) CL/F (L/hr) V/F (L) t½ (hr)
200 mg TID†(n=252) 1103 (67)
[21.5– 3650]
ND¶ ND¶ ND¶ ND¶
200 mg TID‡(n=215) 583 (65)
[89.7-2200]
15,900 (62)
[4100-56,100]
51.2 (54)
[10.7-146]
2425 (39)
[828-5702]
37.2 (39)
[19.1-148]
400 mg BID§ (n=23) 723 (86)
[6.70-2256]
9093 (80)
[1564-26,794]
76.1 (78)
[14.9-256]
3088 (84)
[407-13,140]
31.7 (42)
[12.4-67.3]
Note: Cav based on observed data; other pharmacokinetic parameters based on estimates from population pharmacokinetic analyses
* Oral suspension administration† Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) recipients with graft-versus-host disease
‡ Neutropenic patients who were receiving cytotoxic chemotherapy for acute myelogenous leukemia or myelodysplastic syndromes
§ Febrile neutropenic patients or patients with refractory invasive fungal infections, Cav n=24
|| AUC (0-24 hr) for 200 mg TID and AUC (0-12 hr) for 400 mg BID
¶ Not done
The variability in average plasma posaconazole concentrations in patients was relatively higher than that in healthy subjects.

Distribution

Posaconazole has an apparent volume of distribution of 1774 L, suggesting extensive extravascular distribution and penetration into the body tissues.

Posaconazole is highly protein bound ( > 98%), predominantly to albumin.

Metabolism

Posaconazole primarily circulates as the parent compound in plasma. Of the circulating metabolites, the majority are glucuronide conjugates formed via UDP glucuronidation (phase 2 enzymes). Posaconazole does not have any major circulating oxidative (CYP450 mediated) metabolites. The excreted metabolites in urine and feces account for ~17% of the administered radiolabeled dose.

Posaconazole is primarily metabolized via UDP glucuronidation (phase 2 enzymes) and is a substrate for p-glycoprotein (P-gp) efflux. Therefore, inhibitors or inducers of these clearance pathways may affect posaconazole plasma concentrations. A summary of drugs studied clinically, which affect posaconazole concentrations, is provided in Table 11.

TABLE 11: Summary of the Effect of Co-administered Drugs on Posaconazole in Healthy Volunteers

Co-administered Drug (Postulated Mechanism ofInteraction) Co-administered Drug Dose/Schedule Posaconazole Dose/Schedule Effect on Bioavailability of Posaconazole
Change in Mean Cmax (ratio estimate*; 90% CI of the ratio estimate) Change in Mean AUC (ratio estimate*; 90% CI of the ratio estimate)
Efavirenz(UDP-G Induction) 400 mg QD x 10 and 20 days 400 mg (oral suspension) BID x 10 and 20 days ↓45%
(0.55; 0.47-0.66)
↓50%
(0.50; 0.43-0.60)
Rifabutin (UDP-G Induction) 300 mg QD x 17 days 200 mg (tablets) QD x 10 days ↓43%
(0.57; 0.43-0.75)
↓49%
(0.51; 0.37-0.71)
Phenytoin (UDP-G Induction) 200 mg QD x 10 days 200 mg (tablets) QD x 10 days ↓41%
(0.59; 0.44-0.79)
↓50%
(0.50; 0.36-0.71)
Cimetidine (Alteration of Gastric pH) 400 mg BID x 10 days 200 mg (tablets) QD x 10 days ↓39%
(0.61; 0.53-0.70)
↓39%
(0.61; 0.54-0.69)
Esomeprazole (Increase in gastric pH) 40 mg QAM x 3 days 400 mg (oral suspension) single dose ↓46%
(0.54; 0.43-0.69)
↓32%
(0.68; 0.57-0.81)
Metoclopramide (Increase in gastric motility) 10 mg TID x 2 days 400 mg (oral suspension) single dose ↓21%
(0.79; 0.72-0.87)
↓19%
(0.81; 0.72-0.91)
* Ratio Estimate is the ratio of co-administered drug plus posaconazole to posaconazole alone for Cmax or AUC.

In vitro studies with human hepatic microsomes and clinical studies indicate that posaconazole is an inhibitor primarily of CYP3A4. A clinical study in healthy volunteers also indicates that posaconazole is a strong CYP3A4 inhibitor as evidenced by a > 5-fold increase in midazolam AUC. Therefore, plasma concentrations of drugs predominantly metabolized by CYP3A4 may be increased by posaconazole. A summary of the drugs studied clinically, for which plasma concentrations were affected by posaconazole, is provided in Table 12 [see CONTRAINDICATIONS, and DRUG INTERACTIONSincluding recommendations].

TABLE 12: Summary of the Effect of Posaconazole on Co-administered Drugs in Healthy Volunteers and Patients

Coadministered Drug (Postulated Mechanism of Coadministered Drug Dose/Schedule Posaconazole Dose/ Schedule Effect on Bioavailability of Co-administered Drugs
Change in Mean Cmax (ratio estimate*; 90% CI of the ratio estimate) Change in Mean AUC (ratio estimate*; 90% CI of the ratio estimate)
Sirolimus 2-mg single oral dose 400 mg (oral suspension) BID x 16 days ↑572%
(6.72; 5.62-8.03)
↑788%
(8.88; 7.26-10.9)
Cyclosporin Stable maintenance dosme in heart transplant recipients 200 mg (tablets) QD x 10days ↑cyclosporine whole blood trough concentrations Cyclosporine dose reductions of up to 29% were required
 
Tacrolimus 0.05-mg/kg single oral dose 400 mg (oral suspension) BID × 7 days ↑121%
(2.21; 2.01-2.42)
↑358%
(4.58; 4.03-5.19)
Simvastatin 40-mg single oral dose 100 mg (oral suspension) QD x 13 days Simvastatin Simvastatin
↑841%
(9.41, 7.13 - 12.44)
↑931%
(10.31, 8.40 - 12.67)
Simvastatin Acid Simvastatin Acid
↑817%
(9.17, 7.36 - 11.43)
↑634%
(7.34, 5.82 - 9.25)
200 mg (oral suspension) QD x 13 days Simvastatin Simvastatin
↑1041%
(11.41, 7.99 - 16.29)
↑960%
(10.60, 8.63 - 13.02)
Simvastatin Acid Simvastatin Acid
↑851%
(9.51, 8.15 - 11.10)
↑748%
(8.48, 7.04 - 10.23)
Midazolam 0.4-mg single IV dose† 200 mg (oral suspension) BID x 7 days ↑30%
(1.3; 1.13-1.48)
↑362%
(4.62; 4.02-5.3)
0.4-mg single IV dose† 400 mg (oral suspension) BID x 7 days ↑62%
(1.62; 1.41-1.86)
↑524%
(6.24; 5.43-7.16)
2-mg single oral dose† 200 mg (oral suspension) QD x 7 days ↑169%
(2.69; 2.46-2.93)
↑470%
(5.70; 4.82-6.74)
2-mg single oral dose† 400 mg (oral suspension) BID x 7 days ↑138%
(2.38; 2.13-2.66)
↑397%
(4.97; 4.46-5.54)
Rifabutin 300 mg QD x 17 days 200 mg (tablets) QD × 10days ↑31%
(1.31; 1.10-1.57)
↑72%
(1.72;1.51-1.95)
 
Phenytoin 200 mg QD PO x 10 days 200 mg (tablets) QD x 10days ↑16%
(1.16; 0.85-1.57)
↑16%
(1.16; 0.84-1.59)
Ritonavir 100 mg QD x 14 days 400 mg (oral suspension) BID x 7 days ↑49%
(1.49; 1.04-2.15)
↑80%
(1.8;1.39-2.31)
Atazanavir 300 mg QD x 14 days 400 mg (oral suspension) BID x 7 days ↑155%
(2.55; 1.89-3.45)
↑268%
(3.68; 2.89-4.70)
Atazanavir/ritonavir boosted regimen 300 mg/100 mg QD x 14days 400 mg (oral suspension) BID x 7 days ↑53%
(1.53; 1.13-2.07)
↑146%
(2.46; 1.93-3.13)
*Ratio Estimate is the ratio of co-administered drug plus posaconazole to co-administered drug alone for Cmax or AUC.
† The mean terminal half-life of midazolam was increased from 3 hours to 7 to 11 hours during co-administration with posaconazole.

Additional clinical studies demonstrated that no clinically significant effects on zidovudine, lamivudine, indinavir, or caffeine were observed when administered with posaconazole 200 mg QD; therefore, no dose adjustments are required for these co-administered drugs when co-administered with posaconazole 200 mg QD.

Excretion

Posaconazole is eliminated with a mean half-life (t½) of 35 hours (range: 20-66 hours) and a total body clearance (CL/F) of 32 L/hr. Posaconazole is predominantly eliminated in the feces (71% of the radiolabeled dose up to 120 hours) with the major component eliminated as parent drug (66% of the radiolabeled dose). Renal clearance is a minor elimination pathway, with 13% of the radiolabeled dose excreted in urine up to 120 hours ( < 0.2% of the radiolabeled dose is parent drug).

Microbiology

Mechanism of Action

Posaconazole blocks the synthesis of ergosterol, a key component of the fungal cell membrane, through the inhibition of the enzyme lanosterol 14α-demethylase and accumulation of methylated sterol precursors.

Activity in vitro and in vivo

Posaconazole has shown in vitro activity against Aspergillus fumigatus and Candida albicans, including Candida albicans isolates from patients refractory to itraconazole or fluconazole or both drugs [see Clinical Studies, INDICATIONS, and DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION].

In vitro susceptibility testing was performed according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) methods (M27-A2, M27-A, M38-A, M38-P). However, correlation between the results of susceptibility studies and clinical outcome has not been established. Posaconazole interpretive criteria/ breakpoints have not been established for any fungi.

In immunocompetent and/or immunocompromised mice and rabbits with pulmonary or disseminated infection with A. fumigatus, posaconazole administered prophylactically was effective in prolonging survival and reducing mycological burden. Prophylactic posaconazole also prolonged survival of immunocompetent mice challenged with C. albicans or A. flavus.

Drug Resistance

Clinical isolates of Candida albicans and Candida glabrata with decreases in posaconazole susceptibility were observed in oral swish samples taken during prophylaxis with posaconazole and fluconazole, suggesting a potential for development of resistance. These isolates also showed reduced susceptibility to other azoles, suggesting cross-resistance between azoles. The clinical significance of this finding is not known.

Animal Toxicology and/or Pharmacology

In immunocompetent and/or immunocompromised mice and rabbits with pulmonary or disseminated infection with A. fumigatus, posaconazole administered prophylactically was effective in prolonging survival and reducing mycological burden. Prophylactic posaconazole also prolonged survival of immunocompetent mice challenged with C. albicans or A. flavus [see Clinical Studies].

Clinical Studies

Prophylaxis of Aspergillus and Candida Infections

Two randomized, controlled studies were conducted using posaconazole as prophylaxis for the prevention of invasive fungal infections (IFIs) among patients at high risk due to severely compromised immune systems.

The first study (Study 1) was a randomized, double-blind trial that compared posaconazole oral suspension (200 mg three times a day) with fluconazole capsules (400 mg once daily) as prophylaxis against invasive fungal infections in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) recipients with Graft versus Host Disease (GVHD). Efficacy of prophylaxis was evaluated using a composite endpoint of proven/probable IFIs, death, or treatment with systemic antifungal therapy (patients may have met more than one of these criteria). Study 1 assessed all patients while on study therapy plus 7 days and at 16 weeks post-randomization. The mean duration of therapy was comparable between the 2 treatment groups (80 days, posaconazole; 77 days, fluconazole). Table 13 contains the results from Study 1.

TABLE 13: Results From Blinded Clinical Study 1 in Prophylaxis of IFI in All Randomized Patients With Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant (HSCT) and Graft-vs.-Host Disease (GVHD)

  Posaconazole
n=301
Fluconazole
n=299
On therapy plus 7 days
Clinical Failure* 50 (17%) 55 (18%)
Failure due to:    
  Proven/ProbableIFI 7 (2%) 22 (7%)
(Aspergillus) 3 (1%) 17 (6%)
(Candida) 1 ( < 1%) 3 (1%)
(Other) 3 (1%) 2 (1%)
  All Deaths 22 (7%) 24 (8%)
Proven/probable fungal infection prior to death 2 ( < 1%) 6 (2%)
  SAF† 27 (9%) 25 (8%)
Through 16 weeks
Clinical Failure*,‡ 99 (33%) 110 (37%)
Failure due to:    
  Proven/Probable IFI 16 (5%) 27 (9%)
(Aspergillus) 7 (2%) 21 (7%)
(Candida) 4 (1%) 4 (1%)
(Other) 5 (2%) 2 (1%)
  All Deaths 58 (19%) 59 (20%)
Proven/probable fungal infection priorto death 10 (3%) 16 (5%)
  SAF† 26 (9%) 30 (10%)
  Event free lost to follow-up§ 24 (8%) 30 (10%)
* Patients may have met more than one criterion defining failure.
† Use of systemic antifungal therapy (SAF) criterion is based on protocol definitions (empiric/IFI usage > 4 consecutive days).
‡ 95% confidence interval (posaconazole-fluconazole) = (-11.5%, +3.7%).
§ Patients who are lost to follow-up (not observed for 112 days), and who did not meet another clinical failure endpoint. These patients were considered failures.

The second study (Study 2) was a randomized, open-label study that compared posaconazole oral suspension (200 mg three times a day) with fluconazole suspension (400 mg once daily) or itraconazole oral solution (200 mg twice a day) as prophylaxis against IFIs in neutropenic patients who were receiving cytotoxic chemotherapy for acute myelogenous leukemia or myelodysplastic syndromes. As in Study 1, efficacy of prophylaxis was evaluated using a composite endpoint of proven/probable IFIs, death, or treatment with systemic antifungal therapy (Patients might have met more than one of these criteria). Study 2 assessed patients while on treatment plus 7 days and 100 days post-randomization. The mean duration of therapy was comparable between the two treatment groups (29 days, posaconazole; 25 days, fluconazole or itraconazole). Table 14 contains the results from Study 2.

TABLE 14: Results From Open-Label Clinical Study 2 in Prophylaxis of IFI in All Randomized Patients With Hematologic Malignancy and Prolonged Neutropenia

  Posaconazole
n=304
Fluconazole/
Itraconazole
n=298
On therapy plus 7days
Clinical Failure*,† 82 (27%) 126 (42%)
Failure due to:    
  Proven/Probable IFI 7 (2%) 25 (8%)
(Aspergillus) 2 (1%) 20 (7%)
(Candida) 3 (1%) 2 (1%)
(Other) 2 (1%) 3 (1%)
  All Deaths 17 (6%) 25 (8%)
     Proven/probable fungal infection prior to death 1 ( < 1%) 2 (1%)
  SAF‡ 67 (22%) 98 (33%)
Through 100 days post-randomization
Clinical Failure† 158 (52%) 191 (64%)
  Failure due to:    
     Proven/Probable IFI 14 (5%) 33 (11%)
(Aspergillus) 2 (1%) 26 (9%)
(Candida) 10 (3%) 4 (1%)
(Other) 2 (1%) 3 (1%)
     All Deaths 44 (14%) 64 (21%)
        Proven/probable fungal infection prior to death 2 (1%) 16 (5%)
     SAF‡ 98 (32%) 125 (42%)
     Event free lost to follow-up§ 34 (11%) 24 (8%)
* 95% confidence interval (posaconazole-fluconazole/itraconazole) = (-22.9%, -7.8%).
† Patients may have met more than one criterion defining failure.
‡ Use of systemic antifungal therapy (SAF) criterion is based on protocol definitions (empiric/IFI usage > 3 consecutive days).
§ Patients who are lost to follow-up (not observed for 100 days), and who did not meet another clinical failure endpoint. These patients were considered failures.

In summary, 2 clinical studies of prophylaxis were conducted. As seen in the accompanying tables (Tables 14 and 15), clinical failure represented a composite endpoint of breakthrough IFI, mortality and use of systemic antifungal therapy. In Study 1 (Table 14), the clinical failure rate of posaconazole (33%) was similar to fluconazole (37%), (95% CI for the difference posaconazole–comparator -11.5% to 3.7%) while in Study 2 (Table 15) clinical failure was lower for patients treated with posaconazole (27%) when compared to patients treated with fluconazole or itraconazole (42%), (95% CI for the difference posaconazole–comparator -22.9% to -7.8%).

All-cause mortality was similar at 16 weeks for both treatment arms in Study 1 [POS 58/301 (19%) vs. FLU 59/299 (20%)]; all-cause mortality was lower at 100 days for posaconazole-treated patients in Study 2 [POS 44/304 (14%) vs. FLU/ITZ 64/298 (21%)]. Both studies demonstrated substantially fewer breakthrough infections caused by Aspergillus species in patients receiving posaconazole prophylaxis when compared to patients receiving fluconazole or itraconazole.

Treatment of Oropharyngeal Candidiasis

Study 3 was a randomized, controlled, evaluator-blinded study in HIV-infected patients with oropharyngeal candidiasis. Patients were treated with posaconazole or fluconazole oral suspension (both posaconazole and fluconazole were given as follows: 100 mg twice a day for 1 day followed by 100 mg once a day for 13 days).

Clinical and mycological outcomes were assessed after 14 days of treatment and at 4 weeks after the end of treatment. Patients who received at least 1 dose of study medication and had a positive oral swish culture of Candida species at baseline were included in the analyses (Table 16). The majority of the subjects had C. albicans as the baseline pathogen.

Clinical success at Day 14 (complete or partial resolution of all ulcers and/or plaques and symptoms) and clinical relapse rates (recurrence of signs or symptoms after initial cure or improvement) 4 weeks after the end of treatment were similar between the treatment arms (Table 16).

Mycologic eradication rates (absence of colony forming units in quantitative culture at the end of therapy, Day 14), as well as mycologic relapse rates (4 weeks after the end of treatment) were also similar between the treatment arms (see Table 16).

TABLE 16: Clinical Success, Mycological Eradication, and Relapse Rates in Oropharyngeal Candidiasis

  Posaconazole Fluconazole
Clinical Success at End of Therapy (Day 14) 155/169 (91.7%) 148/160 (92.5%)
Clinical Relapse (4 Weeks after End of Therapy) 45/155 (29.0%) 52/148 (35.1%)
Mycological Eradication (absence of CFU) at End of Therapy (Day 14) 88/169 (52.1%) 80/160 (50.0%)
Mycological Relapse (4 Weeks after End of Treatment) 49/88 (55.6%) 51/80 (63.7%)

Mycologic response rates, using a criterion for success as a post-treatment quantitative culture with ≤ 20 colony forming units (CFU/mL) were also similar between the two groups (posaconazole 68.0%, fluconazole 68.1%). The clinical significance of this finding is unknown.

Treatment of Oropharyngeal Candidiasis Refractory to Treatment With Fluconazole or Itraconazole

Study 4 was a noncomparative study of posaconazole oral suspension in HIV-infected subjects with OPC that was refractory to treatment with fluconazole or itraconazole. An episode of OPC was considered refractory if there was failure to improve or worsening of OPC after a standard course of therapy with fluconazole ≥ 100 mg/day for at least 10 consecutive days or itraconazole 200 mg/day for at least 10 consecutive days and treatment with either fluconazole or itraconazole had not been discontinued for more than 14 days prior to treatment with posaconazole. Of the 199 subjects enrolled in this study, 89 subjects met these strict criteria for refractory infection.

Forty-five subjects with refractory OPC were treated with posaconazole 400 mg BID for 3 days, followed by 400 mg QD for 25 days with an option for further treatment during a 3-month maintenance period. Following a dosing amendment, a further 44 subjects were treated with posaconazole 400 mg BID for 28 days. The efficacy of posaconazole was assessed by the clinical success (cure or improvement) rate after 4 weeks of treatment. The clinical success rate was 74.2% (66/89). The clinical success rates for both the original and the amended dosing regimens were similar (73.3% and 75.0%, respectively).

Last reviewed on RxList: 10/12/2010
This monograph has been modified to include the generic and brand name in many instances.

Noxafil - User Reviews

Noxafil User Reviews

Now you can gain knowledge and insight about a drug treatment with Patient Discussions.

Here is a collection of user reviews for the medication Noxafil sorted by most helpful. Patient Discussions FAQs

Report Problems to the Food and Drug Administration

 

You are encouraged to report negative side effects of prescription drugs to the FDA. Visit the FDA MedWatch website or call 1-800-FDA-1088.


Women's Health

Find out what women really need.