Mechanism of Action
Alitretinoin (9-cis-retinoic acid) is a naturally-occurring endogenous
retinoid that binds to and activates all known intracellular retinoid receptor
subtypes (RARα, RARβ, RARγ, RXRα, RXRβ and RXRγ).
Once activated these receptors function as transcription factors that regulate
the expression of genes that control the process of cellular differentiation
and proliferation in both normal and neoplastic cells. Alitretinoin inhibits
the growth of Kaposi's sarcoma (KS) cells in vitro.
Pharmacokinetics
No studies have examined plasma 9-cis-retinoic acid concentrations before
and after treatment with Panretin® gel. There is, however, indirect evidence
that absorption is not extensive. Plasma concentrations of 9-cis-retinoic
acid were evaluated during clinical studies in patients with cutaneous lesions
of AIDS-related KS after repeated multiple-daily dose application of Panretin®
gel for up to 60 weeks. The range of 9-cis-retinoic acid plasma concentrations
in these patients was similar to the range of circulating, naturally-occurring
9-cis-retinoic acid plasma concentrations in untreated healthy volunteers.
Although there are no detectable plasma concentrations of 9-cis-retinoic
acid metabolites after topical application of Panretin® gel, in vitro studies
indicate that the drug is metabolized to 4-hydroxy-9-cis-retinoic acid
and 4-oxo-9-cis-retinoic acid by CYP 2C9, 3A4, 1A1, and 1A2 enzymes.
In vivo, 4-oxo-9-cis-retinoic acid is the major circulating metabolite
following oral administration of 9-cis-retinoic acid.
No formal pharmacokinetic drug interaction studies between Panretin® gel
and antiretroviral agents have been conducted.
Clinical Studies
Panretin® gel is not a systemic therapy; it therefore cannot treat visceral
Kaposi's sarcoma (KS) nor prevent the development of new KS lesions where it
has not been applied. Visceral KS disease was not monitored in these trials,
and the appearance of new KS lesions was not considered part of the response
assessment in clinical trials.
Panretin® gel was evaluated in two multicenter, prospective, randomized,
double-blind, vehicle-controlled studies in patients with cutaneous lesions
of AIDS-related KS. In both studies the primary efficacy endpoint was the patients'
cutaneous KS tumor response rate through 12 weeks of study drug treatment which
was assessed by evaluating from 3 to 8 KS index lesions according to the modified
AIDS Clinical Trials Group (ACTG) response criteria as applied to topical therapy
(i.e., evaluation of height and area reductions of the index lesions only; progressive
disease in non-index lesions and new lesions were not considered progressive
disease; progressive disease was scored only in the treated index lesions).
A global evaluation by physicians was also carried out. It considered all of
the patient's treated lesions (index and other) compared to baseline. In this
evaluation, patients with at least a 50% improvement in the KS lesions were
considered responders. In addition, photographs of lesions in patients considered
responders by the modified ACTG criteria were examined by the FDA for a cosmetically
beneficial response, defined as at least a 50% improvement in appearance compared
to baseline, considering both the KS lesions and dermal toxicity at the lesion
site, in at least 50% of the index lesions and maintained for at least 3 weeks.
Patients were also asked about their satisfaction with the treatment.
In Study 1, a total of 268 patients were entered from centers in the U.S. and
Canada. Patients were treated topically three to four times a day with either
Panretin® gel or a matching vehicle gel for a minimum of 12 weeks, followed
by an open-label phase in patients who had not yet progressed on Panretin®
gel. Responses during the double-blind phase are shown in Table 1. Responses
to Panretin® gel were seen in both previously untreated patients and in
patients with prior systemic and/or topical KS treatment. A total of 72 patients
responded to Panretin® gel during the randomized or crossover portions of
the study. At a median duration of monitoring of 16 weeks, only 15% of the 72
patients had relapsed. Panretin® gel would not be expected to affect development
of new lesions in untreated areas and these were seen in about 50% of patients,
at similar rates in treated and untreated patients, responders and non-responders.
The patients' assessment of their overall satisfaction with the drug effect
on all treated lesions significantly favored Panretin® gel.
Study 2 was an international study with a planned enrollment of 270 patients.
Patients were treated topically twice a day with Panretin® gel or a matching
vehicle for 12 weeks. The study was stopped early because of positive interim
results in the initial 82 patient data set. Results of the study are shown in
Table 1. Responses to Panretin® gel were seen both in previously untreated
patients and in patients with prior systemic and/or topical KS treatment.
TABLE 1: Summary of Tumor Responses
| |
STUDY 1 |
STUDY 2 |
Panretin® Gel
N=134 |
Vehicle Gel
N=134 |
Panretin® Gel
N=36 |
Vehicle Gel
N=46 |
Modified ACTG Response
(index lesions) |
34% PR
1% CR |
16% PR
p=0.0012 |
36% PR |
7% PR |
Physician's Global/ Subjective Assessment
(all treated lesions) |
19% PR |
4% PR
p=0.00014 |
47% PR |
11% PR |
Beneficial Response Photographs
(index lesions only) |
15% |
4%
p=0.0026 |
19% |
2% |
In the clinical trials, responses were seen as early as two (2) weeks; most
patients, however, required four (4) to eight (8) weeks of treatment, and some
patients did not experience significant improvement until 14 or more weeks of
treatment. The cumulative percentage of patients who achieved a response was
less than 1% at 2 weeks, 10% at 4 weeks, and 28% at 8 weeks.
In both studies, responses occurred in patients with a wide range of baseline
CD4+ lymphocyte counts, including patients with CD4+ lymphocyte counts less
than 50 cells/mm³. Nearly all patients received concomitant combination
antiretroviral therapy.
Photographs of patients revealed a substantial erythematous and edematous response
in some cases, leading to a cosmetically mixed outcome even in apparent responders.
Nonetheless, in Study 1 it appeared that a cosmetically satisfactory result
occurred at about the same rate as the Physician's Global response rate and
in both studies such a response was more frequent than in the vehicle control.
Last updated on RxList: 11/17/2008