Endogenous estrogens are largely responsible for the
development and maintenance of the female reproductive system and secondary
sexual characteristics. Although circulating estrogens exist in a dynamic
equilibrium of metabolic interconversions, estradiol is the principal
intracellular human estrogen and is substantially more potent than its
metabolites, estrone and estriol, at the receptor level.
The primary source of estrogen in normally cycling adult
women is the ovarian follicle, which secretes 70 to 500 mcg of estradiol daily,
depending on the phase of the menstrual cycle. After menopause, most endogenous
estrogen is produced by conversion of androstenedione, secreted by the adrenal
cortex, to estrone by peripheral tissues. Thus, estrone and the
sulfate-conjugated form, estrone sulfate, are the most abundant circulating
estrogens in postmenopausal women.
Estrogens act through binding to nuclear receptors in
estrogen-responsive tissues. To date, two estrogen receptors have been
identified. These vary in proportion from tissue to tissue.
Circulating estrogens modulate the pituitary secretion of
the gonadotropins, luteinizing hormone (LH) and follicle stimulating hormone
(FSH), through a negative feedback mechanism. Estrogens act to reduce the
elevated levels of these gonadotropins seen in postmenopausal women.
Parenterally administered medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA)
inhibits gonadotropin production, which in turn prevents follicular maturation
and ovulation, although available data indicate that this does not occur when
the usually recommended oral dosage is given as single daily doses. MPA may
achieve its beneficial effect on the endometrium in part by decreasing nuclear
estrogen receptors and suppression of epithelial DNA synthesis in endometrial
tissue. Androgenic and anabolic effects of MPA have been noted, but the drug is
apparently devoid of significant estrogenic activity.
Pharmacokinetics
Absorption
Conjugated estrogens are water-soluble and are well-absorbed
from the gastrointestinal tract after release from the drug formulation.
However, PREMPRO and PREMPHASE contain a formulation of medroxyprogesterone
acetate (MPA) that is immediately released and conjugated estrogens that are
slowly released over several hours. MPA is well absorbed from the
gastrointestinal tract. Table 1 summarizes the mean pharmacokinetic parameters
for unconjugated and conjugated estrogens, and medroxyprogesterone acetate
following administration of 2 PREMPRO 0.625 mg/2.5 mg and 2 PREMPRO 0.625 mg/5
mg tablets to healthy postmenopausal women.
TABLE 1 : PHARMACOKINETIC PARAMETERS FOR UNCONJUGATED AND
CONJUGATED ESTROGENS (CE) AND MEDROXYPROGESTERONE ACETATE (MPA)
| DRUG |
2 x 0.625 mg CE/2.5 mg MPA Combination Tablets
(n=54) |
2 x 0.625 mg CE/5 mg MPA Combination Tablets
(n=51) |
| PK Parameter Arithmetic Mean (% CV) |
Cmax (pg/mL) |
tmax (h) |
t½ (h) |
AUC (pg•h/mL) |
Cmax (pg/mL) |
tmax (h) |
t½ (h) |
AUC (pg•h/mL) |
| Unconjugated Estrogens |
| Estrone |
175(23) |
7.6(24) |
31.6(23) |
5358(34) |
124(43) |
10(35) |
62.2(137) |
6303(40) |
| BA* -Estrone |
159(26) |
7.6(24) |
16.9(34) |
3313(40) |
104(49) |
10(35) |
26.0(100) |
3136(51) |
| Equilin |
71(31) |
5.8(34) |
9.9(35) |
951(43) |
54(43) |
8.9(34) |
15.5(53) |
1179(56) |
| PK Parameter Arithmetic Mean (% CV) |
Cmax (ng/mL) |
tmax (h) |
t½ (h) |
AUC (ng•h/mL) |
Cmax (ng/mL) |
tmax (h) |
t½ (h) |
AUC (ng•h/mL) |
| Conjugated Estrogens |
| Total Estrone |
6.6(38) |
6.1(28) |
20.7(34) |
116(59) |
6.3(48) |
9.1(29) |
23.6(36) |
151(42) |
| BA* -Total Estrone |
6.4(39) |
6.1(28) |
15.4(34) |
100(57) |
6.2(48) |
9.1(29) |
20.6(35) |
139(40) |
| Total Equilin |
5.1(45) |
4.6(35) |
11.4(25) |
50(70) |
4.2(52) |
7.0(36) |
17.2(131) |
72(50) |
| PK Parameter Arithmetic Mean (% CV) |
Cmax (ng/mL) |
tmax (h) |
t½ (h) |
AUC (ng•h/mL) |
Cmax (ng/mL) |
tmax (h) |
t½ (h) |
AUC (ng•h/mL) |
| Medroxyprogesterone Acetate |
| MPA |
1.5(40) |
2.8(54) |
37.6(30) |
37(30) |
4.8(31) |
2.4(50) |
46.3(39) |
102(28) |
BA* = Baseline adjusted
Cmax = peak plasma concentration
tmax = time peak concentration occurs
t½ = apparent terminal-phase disposition half-life (0.693/λz)
AUC = total area under the concentration-time curve |
Table 2 summarizes the mean pharmacokinetic parameters for unconjugated and
conjugated estrogens and medroxyprogesterone acetate following administration
of 4 PREMPRO 0.45 mg/1.5 mg tablets to healthy, postmenopausal women.
TABLE 2 : PHARMACOKINETIC PARAMETERS FOR UNCONJUGATED AND
CONJUGATED ESTROGENS (CE) AND MEDROXYPROGESTERONE ACETATE (MPA)
| DRUG |
4 x 0.45 mg CE/1.5 mg MPA Combination
(n = 65) |
| PK Parameter Arithmetic Mean (%CV) |
Cmax (pg/mL) |
tmax (h) |
t½ (h) |
AUC (pg•h/mL) |
| Unconjugated Estrogens |
| Estrone |
149(35) |
8.9(35) |
37.5(35) |
6641(39) |
| BA* -Estrone |
130(40) |
8.9(35) |
21.2(35) |
3799(47) |
| Equilin |
83(38) |
8.3(48) |
15.9(44) |
1889(40) |
| PK Parameter Arithmetic Mean (%CV) |
Cmax (ng/mL) |
tmax (h) |
t½ (h) |
AUC (ng•h/mL) |
| Conjugated Estrogens |
| Total Estrone |
5.4(49) |
7.9(48) |
22.4(53) |
119(48) |
| BA* -Total Estrone |
5.2(48) |
7.9(48) |
15.1(29) |
100(47) |
| Total Equilin |
4.3(42) |
6.5(45) |
11.6(31) |
74(48) |
| PK Parameter Arithmetic Mean (%CV) |
Cmax (ng/mL) |
tmax (h) |
t½ (h) |
AUC (ng•h/mL) |
| Medroxyprogesterone Acetate |
| MPA |
0.7(66) |
2.0(52) |
26.2(35) |
5.0(61) |
BA* = Baseline adjusted
Cmax = peak plasma concentration
tmax = time peak concentration occurs
t½ = apparent terminal-phase disposition half-life (0.693/λz)
AUC = total area under the concentration-time curve |
Food-Effect: Single dose studies in healthy, postmenopausal women
were conducted to investigate any potential drug interaction when PREMPRO or
PREMPHASE is administered with a high fat breakfast. Administration with food
decreased the Cmax of total estrone by 18 to 34 percent and increased total
equilin Cmax by 38 percent compared to the fasting state, with no other effect
on the rate or extent of absorption of other conjugated or unconjugated estrogens.
Administration with food approximately doubles MPA Cmax and increases MPA AUC
by approximately 20 to 30 percent.
Dose Proportionality: The Cmax and AUC values
for MPA observed in two separate pharmacokinetic studies conducted with 2
PREMPRO 0.625 mg/2.5 mg or 2 PREMPRO or PREMPHASE 0.625 mg/5 mg tablets
exhibited nonlinear dose proportionality; doubling the MPA dose from 2 x 2.5 to
2 x 5.0 mg increased the mean Cmax and AUC by 3.2 and 2.8 folds, respectively.
The dose proportionality of estrogens and
medroxyprogesterone acetate was assessed by combining pharmacokinetic data
across another two studies totaling 61 healthy, postmenopausal women. Single
conjugated estrogens doses of 2 x 0.3 mg, 2 x 0.45 mg, or 2 x 0.625 mg were
administered either alone or in combination with medroxyprogesterone acetate
doses of 2 x 1.5 mg or 2 x 2.5 mg. Most of the estrogen components demonstrated
dose proportionality; however, several estrogen components did not.
Medroxyprogesterone acetate pharmacokinetic parameters increased in a
dose-proportional manner.
Distribution
The distribution of exogenous estrogens is similar to that
of endogenous estrogens. Estrogens are widely distributed in the body and are
generally found in higher concentrations in the sex hormone target organs.
Estrogens circulate in the blood largely bound to sex hormone binding globulin
(SHBG) and albumin. MPA is approximately 90% bound to plasma proteins but does
not bind to SHBG.
Metabolism
Exogenous estrogens are metabolized in the same manner as
endogenous estrogens. Circulating estrogens exist in a dynamic equilibrium of
metabolic interconversions. These transformations take place mainly in the
liver. Estradiol is converted reversibly to estrone, and both can be converted
to estriol, which is the major urinary metabolite. Estrogens also undergo
enterohepatic recirculation via sulfate and glucuronide conjugation in the
liver, biliary secretion of conjugates into the intestine, and hydrolysis i
the intestine followed by reabsorption. In postmenopausal women a significant
proportion of the circulating estrogens exists as sulfate conjugates,
especially estrone sulfate, which serves as a circulating reservoir for the
formation of more active estrogens. Metabolism and elimination of MPA occur
primarily in the liver via hydroxylation, with subsequent conjugation and
elimination in the urine.
Excretion
Estradiol, estrone, and estriol are excreted in the urine,
along with glucuronide and sulfate conjugates. Most metabolites of MPA are
excreted as glucuronide conjugates with only minor amounts excreted as
sulfates.
Special Populations
No pharmacokinetic studies were conducted in special
populations, including patients with renal or hepatic impairment.
Drug Interactions
Data from a single-dose drug-drug interaction study
involving conjugated estrogens and medroxyprogesterone acetate indicate that
the pharmacokinetic disposition of both drugs is not altered when the drugs are
coadministered. No other clinical drug-drug interaction studies have been
conducted with conjugated estrogens.
In vitro and in vivo studies have shown that estrogens are
metabolized partially by cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4). Therefore, inducers or
inhibitors of CYP3A4 may affect estrogen drug metabolism. Inducers of CYP3A4,
such as St. John's Wort preparations (Hypericum perforatum), phenobarbital,
carbamazepine, and rifampin, may reduce plasma concentrations of estrogens,
possibly resulting in a decrease in therapeutic effects and/or changes in the
uterine bleeding profile. Inhibitors of CYP3A4, such as erythromycin,
clarithromycin, ketoconazole, itraconazole, ritonavir and grapefruit juice, may
increase plasma concentrations of estrogens and may result in side effects.
Clinical Studies
Effects on vasomotor symptoms
In the first year of the Health and Osteoporosis, Progestin
and Estrogen (HOPE) Study, a total of 2,805 postmenopausal women (average age
53.3 ±years) were randomly assigned to one of eight treatment groups of either
placebo or conjugated estrogens, with or without medroxyprogesterone acetate.
Efficacy for vasomotor symptoms was assessed during the first 12 weeks of
treatment in a subset of symptomatic women (n = 241) who had at least seven
moderate to severe hot flushes daily, or at least 50 moderate to severe hot
flushes during the week before randomization. PREMPRO 0.625 mg/2.5 mg, 0.45
mg/1.5 mg, and 0.3 mg/1.5 mg were shown to be statistically better than
placebo at weeks 4 and 12 for relief of both the frequency and severity of
moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms. Table 3 shows the adjusted mean number
of hot flushes in the PREMPRO 0.625 mg/2.5 mg, 0.45 mg/1.5 mg, 0.3 mg/1.5 mg,
and placebo groups during the initial 12-week period.
TABLE 3: SUMMARY TABULATION OF THE NUMBER OF HOT FLUSHES
PER DAY – MEAN VALUES AND COMPARISONS BETWEEN THE ACTIVE TREATMENT GROUPS AND
THE PLACEBO GROUP – PATIENTS WITH AT LEAST 7 MODERATE TO SEVERE FLUSHES PER
DAY OR AT LEAST 50 PER WEEK AT BASELINE, LAST OBSERVATION CARRIED FORWARD (LOCF)
| Treatmenta (No. of Patients) |
---------No. of Hot Flushes/Day---------- |
| Time Period (week) |
Baseline Mean ± SD |
Observed Mean ± SD |
Mean Change ± SD |
p-Values vs. Placebob |
0.625 mg/2.5 mg
(n = 34) |
| 4 |
11.98 ± 3.54 |
3.19 ± 3.74 |
-8.78 ± 4.72 |
< 0.001 |
| 12 |
11.98 ± 3.54 |
1.16 ± 2.22 |
-10.82 ± 4.61 |
< 0.001 |
0.45mg/1.5mg
(n = 29) |
| 4 |
12.61 ± 4.29 |
3.64 ± 3.61 |
-8.98 ± 4.74 |
< 0.001 |
| 12 |
12.61 ± 4.29 |
1.69 ± 3.36 |
-10.92 ± 4.63 |
< 0.001 |
0.3 mg/1.5 mg
(n = 33) |
| 4 |
11.30 ± 3.13 |
3.70 ± 3.29 |
-7.60 ± 4.71 |
< 0.001 |
| 12 |
11.30 ± 3.13 |
1.31 ± 2.82 |
-10.00 ± 4.60 |
< 0.001 |
Placebo
(n = 28) |
| 4 |
11.69 ± 3.87 |
7.89 ± 5.28 |
-3.80 ± 4.71 |
- |
| 12 |
11.69 ± 3.87 |
5.71 ± 5.22 |
-5.98 ± 4.60 |
- |
a Identified by dosage (mg) of Premarin/MPA or
placebo.
b There were no statistically significant differences between
the 0.625 mg/2.5 mg, 0.45 mg/1.5 mg, and 0.3 mg/1.5 mg groups at any time
period. |
Effects on vulvar and vaginal atrophy
Results of vaginal maturation indexes at cycles 6 and 13
showed that the differences from placebo were statistically significant (p <
0.001) for all treatment groups (conjugated estrogens alone and conjugated
estrogens/medroxyprogesterone acetate treatment groups).
Effects on the endometrium
In a 1-year clinical trial of 1,376 women (average age 54.0 ± 4.6 years))
randomized to PREMPRO 0.625 mg/2.5 mg (n=340), PREMPRO 0.625 mg/5 mg (n=338),
PREMPHASE 0.625 mg/5 mg (n=351),or Premarin 0.625 mg alone (n=347),results of
evaluable biopsies at 12 months (n=279,274,277,and 283,respectively)showed a
reduced risk of endometrial hyperplasia in the two PREMPRO treatment groups
(less than 1 percent)and in the PREMPHASE treatment group (less than 1 percent;1
percent when focal hyperplasia was included)compared to the Premarin group (8
percent;20 percent when focal hyperplasia was included). See Table 4.
TABLE 4: INCIDENCE OF ENDOMETRIAL HYPERPLASIA AFTER ONE
YEAR OF TREATMENT
| |
Groups |
PREMPRO
0.625 mg/2.5 mg |
PREMPRO
0.625 mg/5 mg |
PREMPHASE
0.625 mg/5 mg |
Premarin
0.625 mg |
| Total number of patients |
340 |
338 |
351 |
347 |
| Number of patients with evaluable biopsies |
279 |
274 |
277 |
283 |
| No. (%) of patients with biopsies |
- all focal and non-focal hyperplasia
|
2 ( < 1)* |
0 (0)* |
3 (1)* |
57 (20) |
- excluding focal cystic hyperplasia
|
2 ( < 1)* |
0 (0)* |
1 ( < 1)* |
25 (8) |
| * Significant (p < 0.001) in comparison with Premarin
(0.625 mg) alone. |
In the first year of the Health and Osteoporosis, Progestin and Estrogen (HOPE)
Study, 2,001 women (average age 53.3 ± 4.9 years) of88 percent were Caucasian
were treated with either Premarin 0.625 mg alone (n = 348), Premarin 0.45 mg
alone (n = 338), Premarin 0.3 mg alone (n = 326) or PREMPRO 0.625 mg/2.5 mg
(n = 331), PREMPRO 0.45 mg/1.5 mg (n = 331) or PREMPRO 0.3 mg/1.5 mg (n = 327).
Results of evaluable endometrial biopsies at 12 months showed a reduced risk
of endometrial hyperplasia or cancer in the PREMPRO treatment groups compared
with the corresponding Premarin alone treatment groups, except for the PREMPRO
0.3 mg/1.5 mg and Premarin 0.3 mg alone groups, in each of which there was only
1 case. See Table 5.
No endometrial hyperplasia or cancer was noted in those
patients treated with the continuous combined regimens who continued for a
second year in the osteoporosis and metabolic substudy of the HOPE study. See
Table 6.
TABLE 5 : INCIDENCE OF ENDOMETRIAL HYPERPLASIA/CANCERa
AFTER ONE YEAR OF TREATMENTb
| Patient |
Groups |
Prempro
0.625 mg/2.5 mg |
Premarin
0.625mg |
Prempro
0.45 mg/1.5 mg |
Premarin
0.45 mg |
Prempro
0.3 mg/1.5 mg |
Premarin
0.3 mg |
| Total number of patients |
331 |
348 |
331 |
338 |
327 |
326 |
| Number of patients with evaluable biopsies |
278 |
249 |
272 |
279 |
271 |
269 |
| No. (%) of patients with biopsies |
- hyperplasia/cancera (consensusc)
|
0(0)d |
20(8) |
1( < 1)a,d |
9 (3) |
1 ( < 1)e |
1 ( < 1)a |
a All cases of hyperplasia/cancer were endometrial
hyperplasia except for 1 patient in the Premarin 0.3 mg group diagnosed
with endometrial cancer based on endometrial biopsy, and 1 patient in
the Premarin/MPA 0.45 mg/1.5 mg group diagnosed with endometrial cancer
based on endometrial biopsy.
b Two (2) primary pathologists evaluated each endometrial biopsy.
Where there was lack of agreement on the presence or absence of hyperplasia/cancer
between the two, a third pathologist adjudicated (consensus).
c For an endometrial biopsy to be counted as consensus endometrial
hyperplasia or cancer, at least 2 pathologists had to agree on the diagnosis.
d Significant (p < 0.05) in comparison with corresponding
dose of Premarin alone.
e Non-significant in comparison with corresponding dose of
Premarin alone. |
TABLE 6 : OSTEOPOROSIS AND METABOLIC SUBSTUDY, INCIDENCE
OF ENDOMETRIAL HYPERPLASIA/CANCERa AFTER TWO YEARS OF TREATMENTb
| Patient |
Groups |
Prempro
0.625 mg/2.5 mg |
Premarin
0.625mg |
Prempro
0.45 mg/1.5 mg |
Premarin
0.45 mg |
Prempro
0.3 mg/1.5 mg |
Premarin
0.3 mg |
| Total number of patients |
75 |
65 |
75 |
74 |
79 |
73 |
| Number of patients with |
62 |
55 |
69 |
67 |
75 |
63 |
| evaluable biopsies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| No. (%) of patients with biopsies |
- hyperplasia/cancera (consensusc)
|
0 (0)d |
15 (27) |
0 (0)d |
10 (15) |
0 (0)d |
2 (3) |
a All cases of hyperplasia/cancer were endometrial
hyperplasia in patients who continued for a second year in the osteoporosis
and metabolic substudy of the HOPE study.
b Two (2) primary pathologists evaluated each endometrial biopsy.
Where there was lack of agreement on the presence or absence of hyperplasia/cancer
between the two, a third pathologist adjudicated (consensus).
c For an endometrial biopsy to be counted as consensus endometrial
hyperplasia or cancer, at least 2 pathologists had to agree on the diagnosis.
d Significant (p < 0.05) in comparison with corresponding
dose of Premarin alone. |
Effects on uterine bleeding or spotting
The effects of PREMPRO on uterine bleeding or spotting, as
recorded on daily diary cards, were evaluated in 2 clinical trials. Results are
shown in Figures 1 and 2.
FIGURE 1 : PATIENTS WITH CUMULATIVE AMENORRHEA OVER TIME
PERCENTAGES OF WOMEN WITH NO BLEEDING OR SPOTTING AT A GIVEN CYCLE THROUGH CYCLE
13 INTENT-TO-TREAT POPULATION, LOCF
Note: The percentage of patients who were amenorrheic in a
given cycle and through cycle 13 is shown. If data were missing, the bleeding
value from the last reported day was carried forward (LOCF).
FIGURE 2 : PATIENTS WITH CUMULATIVE AMENORRHEA OVER TIME
PERCENTAGES OF WOMEN WITH NO BLEEDING OR SPOTTING AT A GIVEN CYCLE THROUGH CYCLE
13 INTENT-TO-TREAT POPULATION, LOCF
Note: The percentage of patients who were amenorrheic in a
given cycle and through cycle 13 is shown. If data were missing, the bleeding
value from the last reported day was carried forward (LOCF).
Effects on bone mineral density
Health and Osteoporosis, Progestin and Estrogen (HOPE) Study
The HOPE study was a double-blind, randomized,
placebo/active-drug-controlled, multicenter study of healthy postmenopausal
women with an intact uterus. Subjects (mean age 53.3 years) were 2.3 ± use and
took one 600-mg tablet of elemental0.9 years on average calcium (Caltrate™)
daily. Subjects were not gi ven Vitamin D supplements. They were treated with
PREMPRO 0.625 mg/2.5 mg, 0.45 mg/1.5 mg or 0.3 mg/1.5 mg, comparable doses of
Premarin alone, or placebo. Prevention of bone loss was assessed by measurement
of bone mineral density (BMD), primarily at the anteroposterior lumbar spine
(L2 to L4). Secondarily, BMD measurements of the total body, femoral neck, and
trochanter were also analyzed. Serum osteocalcin, urinary calcium, and
N-telopeptide were used as bone turnover markers (BTM) at cycles 6, 13, 19, and
26.
Intent-to-treat subjects
All active treatment groups showed significant differences
from placebo in each of the four BMD endpoints. These significant differences
were seen at cycles 6, 13, 19, and 26. With PREMPRO, the mean percent increases
in the primary efficacy measure (L2 to L4 BMD) at the final on-therapy
evaluation (cycle 26 for those who completed and the last available evaluation
for those who discontinued early) were 3.28 percent with 0.625 mg/2.5 mg, 2.18
percent with 0.45 mg/1.5 mg, and 1.71 percent with 0.3 mg/1.5 mg. The placebo
group showed a mean percent decrease from baseline at the final evaluation of
2.45 percent. These results show that the lower dose regimens of PREMPRO were
effective in increasing L2 to L4 BMD compared with placebo, and therefore
support the efficacy of lower doses of PREMPRO.
The analysis for the other three BMD endpoints yielded mean
percent changes from baseline in femoral trochanter that were generally larger
than those seen for L2 to L4, and changes in femoral neck and total body that
were generally smaller than those seen for L2 to L4. Significant differences
between groups indicated that each of the PREMPRO treatment groups was more
effective than placebo for all three of these additional BMD endpoints. With
regard to femoral neck and total body, the continuous combined treatment groups
all showed mean percent increases in BMD, while the placebo group showed mean percent
decreases. For femoral trochanter, each of the PREMPRO groups showed a mean
percent increase that was significantly greater than the small increase seen in
the placebo group. The percent changes from baseline to final evaluation are
shown in Table 7.
TABLE 7 : PERCENT CHANGE IN BONE MINERAL DENSITY: COMPARISON
BETWEEN ACTIVE AND PLACEBO GROUPS IN THE INTENT-TO-TREAT POPULATION, LOCF
| Region Evaluated Treatment Groupa |
No. of Subjects |
Baseline (g/cm²) Mean |
Change from Baseline (%) Adjusted Mean ±
SD |
p-Value vs Placebo |
| L2 to L4 BMD |
| 0.625/2.5 |
81 |
1.14 ± 0.16 |
3.28 ± 0.37 |
< 0.001 |
| 0.45/1.5 |
89 |
1.16 ± 0.14 |
2.18 ± 0.35 |
< 0.001 |
| 0.3/1.5 |
90 |
1.14 ± 0.15 |
1.71 ± 0.35 |
< 0.001 |
| Placebo |
85 |
1.14 ± 0.14 |
-2.45 ± 0.36 |
|
| Total body BMD |
| 0.625/2.5 |
81 |
1.14 ± 0.08 |
0.87 ± 0.17 |
< 0.001 |
| 0.45/1.5 |
89 |
1.14 ± 0.07 |
0.59 ± 0.17 |
< 0.001 |
| 0.3/1.5 |
91 |
1.13 ± 0.08 |
0.60 ± 0.16 |
< 0.001 |
| Placebo |
85 |
1.13 ± 0.08 |
-1.50 ± 0.17 |
|
| Femoral neck BMD |
| 0.625/2.5 |
81 |
0.89 ± 0.14 |
1.62 ± 0.46 |
< 0.001 |
| 0.45/1.5 |
89 |
0.89 ± 0.12 |
1.48 ± 0.44 |
< 0.001 |
| 0.3/1.5 |
91 |
0.86 ± 0.11 |
1.31 ± 0.43 |
< 0.001 |
| Placebo |
85 |
0.88 ± 0.14 |
-1.72 ± 0.45 |
|
| Femoral trochanter BMD |
| 0.625/2.5 |
81 |
0.77 ± 0.14 |
3.35 ± 0.59 |
0.002 |
| 0.45/1.5 |
89 |
0.76 ± 0.12 |
2.84 ± 0.57 |
0.011 |
| 0.3/1.5 |
91 |
0.76 ± 0.12 |
3.93 ± 0.56 |
< 0.001 |
| Placebo |
85 |
0.75 ± 0.12 |
0.81 ± 0.58 |
|
| a Identified by dosage (mg/mg)of Premarin/MPA
or placebo. |
Figure 3 shows the cumulative percentage of subjects with percent changes from
baseline in spine BMD equal to or greater than the percent change shown on the
x-axis.
FIGURE 3 : CUMULATIVE PERCENT OF SUBJECTS WITH CHANGES FROM
BASELINE IN SPINE BMD OF GIVEN MAGNITUDE OR GREATER IN PREMARIN/MPA AND PLACEBO
GROUPS
The mean percent changes from baseline in L2 to L4 BMD for
women who completed the bone density study are shown with standard error bars
by treatment group in Figure 4. Significant differences between each of the
PREMPRO dosage groups and placebo were found at cycles 6, 13, 19, and 26.
FIGURE 4 : ADJUSTED MEAN (SE) PERCENT CHANGE FROM BASELINE
AT EACH CYCLE IN SPINE BMD: SUBJECTS COMPLETING IN PREMARIN/MPA GROUPS AND PLACEBO
The bone turnover markers, serum osteocalcin and urinary
N-telopeptide, significantly decreased (p < 0.001) in all active-treatment
groups at cycles 6, 13, 19, and 26 compared with the placebo group. Larger mean
decreases from baseline were seen with the active groups than with the placebo
group. Significant differences from placebo were seen less frequently in urine
calcium; only with PREMPRO 0.625 mg/2.5 mg and 0.45 mg/1.5 mg were there
significantly larger mean decreases than with placebo at 3 or more of the 4
time points.
Women's Health Initiative Studies
The Women's Health Initiative (WHI) enrolled approximately
27,000 predominantly healthy postmenopausal women in two substudies to assess
the risks and benefits of either the use of daily oral conjugated estrogens (CE
0.625 mg) alone or in combination with medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA 2.5 mg)
compared to placebo in the prevention of certain chronic diseases. The primary
endpoint was the incidence of coronary heart disease (CHD) (nonfatal myocardial
infarction [MI], silent MI and CHD death), with invasive breast cancer as the
primary adverse outcome. A “global index” included the earliest occurrence of
CHD, invasive breast cancer, stroke, pulmonary embolism (PE), endometrial
cancer (only in CE/MPA substudy), colorectal cancer, hip fracture, or death due
to other causes. The study did not evaluate the effects of CE/MPA or CE on
menopausal symptoms.
The estrogen plus progestin substudy was stopped early.
According to the predefined stopping rule, after an average follow-up of 5.2
years of treatment, the increased risk of breast cancer and cardiovascular
events exceeded the specified benefits included in the “global index.” The
absolute excess risk of events included in the “global index” was 19 per 10,000
women-years (relative risk [RR] 1.15, 95 percent nominal confidence interval
[nCI] 1.03-1.28).
For those outcomes included in the WHI “global index” that reached
statistical significance after 5.6 years of follow-up, the absolute excess risks
per 10,000 women-years in the group treated with CE/MPA were 6 more CHD events,
7 more strokes, 10 more PEs, and 8 more invasive breast cancers, while the absolute
risk reductions per 10,000 women-years were 7 fewer colorectal cancers and 5
fewer hip fractures. (See BOXED WARNINGS, WARNINGS,
and PRECAUTIONS.)
Results of the estrogen plus progestin substudy, which
included 16,608 women (average age 63 years, range 50 to 79; 83.9 percent
White, 6.8 percent Black, 5.4 percent Hispanic, 3.9 percent Other) are
presented in Table 8. These results reflect centrally adjudicated data after an
average follow-up of 5.6 years.
TABLE 8 : RELATIVE AND ABSOLUTE RISK SEEN IN THE ESTROGEN
PLUS PROGESTIN SUBSTUDY OF WHI AT AN AVERAGE OF 5.6 YEARSa
| Event |
Relative Risk CE/MPA vs. Placebo
(95% nCIb) |
Placebo
n = 8,102 |
CE/MPA
n = 8,506 |
| Absolute Risk per 10,000 Women-Years |
| CHD events |
1.24 (1.00–1.54) |
33 |
39 |
| Non-fatal MI |
1.28 (1.00–1.63) |
25 |
31 |
| CHD death |
1.10 (0.70–1.75) |
8 |
8 |
| All Strokes |
1.31 (1.02–1.68) |
24 |
31 |
| Ischemic stroke |
1.44 (1.09–1.90) |
18 |
26 |
| Deep vein thrombosis |
1.95 (1.43–2.67) |
13 |
26 |
| Pulmonary embolism |
2.13 (1.45–3.11) |
8 |
18 |
| Invasive breast cancerc |
1.24 (1.01–1.54) |
33 |
41 |
| Invasive colorectal cancer |
0.56 (0.38–0.81) |
16 |
9 |
| Endometrial cancer |
0.81 (0.48–1.36) |
7 |
6 |
| Cervical cancer |
1.44 (0.47–4.42) |
1 |
2 |
| Hip fracture |
0.67 (0.47–0.96) |
16 |
11 |
| Vertebral fractures |
0.65 (0.46–0.92) |
17 |
11 |
| Lower arm/wrist fractures |
0.71 (0.59–0.85) |
62 |
44 |
| Total fractures |
0.76 (0.69–0.83) |
199 |
152 |
a Results are based on centrally adjudicated
data. Mortality data was not part of the adjudicated data, however data
at 5.2 years of follow-up showed no difference between the groups in terms
of all-cause mortality (RR 0.98, 95 percent nCI 0.82-1.18).
b Nominal confidence intervals unadjusted for multiple looks
and multiple comparisons.
c Includes metastatic and non-metastatic breast cancer, with
the exception of in situ breast cancer. |
The estrogen alone substudy was also stopped early because an increased risk
of stroke was observed, and it was deemed that no further information would
be obtained regarding the risks and benefits of estrogen alone in predetermined
primary endpoints. Results of the estrogen alone substudy, which included 10,739
women (average age of 63 years, range 50 to 79; 75.3 percent White, 15.1 percent
Black, 6.1 percent Hispanic, 3.6 percent Other) after an average follow-up of
6.8 years, are presented in Table 9.
TABLE 9 : RELATIVE AND ABSOLUTE RISK SEEN IN THE ESTROGEN
ALONE ONE SUBSTUDY OF WHIa
| Event |
Relative Risk
CE vs. Placebo
(95% nCIa) |
Placebo
n = 5,310 |
CE
n = 5,429 |
| Absolute Risk per 10,000 Women-Years |
| CHD eventsb |
0.95 (0.79–1.16) |
56 |
53 |
| Non-fatal MIb |
0.91 (0.73–1.14) |
43 |
40 |
| CHD deathb |
1.01 (0.71–1.43) |
16 |
16 |
| Strokeb |
1.37 (1.09–1.73) |
33 |
45 |
| Ischemicb |
1.55 (1.19-2.01) |
25 |
38 |
| Deep vein thrombosisb,d |
1.47 (1.06–2.06) |
15 |
23 |
| Pulmonary embolismb |
1.37 (0.90–2.07) |
10 |
14 |
| Invasive breast cancerb |
0.80 (0.62–1.04) |
34 |
28 |
| Colorectal cancerc |
1.08 (0.75–1.55) |
16 |
17 |
| Hip fracturec |
0.61 (0.41–0.91) |
17 |
11 |
| Vertebral fracturesc,d |
0.62 (0.42–0.93) |
17 |
11 |
| Total fracturesc,d |
0.70 (0.63–0.79) |
195 |
139 |
| Death due to other causesc,e |
1.08 (0.88–1.32) |
50 |
53 |
| Overall mortalityc,d |
1.04 (0.88–1.22) |
78 |
81 |
| Global Indexc,f |
1.01 (0.91–1.12) |
190 |
192 |
a Nominal confidence intervals unadjusted for
multiple looks and multiple comparisons.
b Results are based on centrally adjudicated data for an average
follow-up of 7.1 years.
c Results are based on an average follow-up of 6.8 years.
d Not included in Global Index.
e All deaths, except from breast or colorectal cancer, definite/probable
CHD, PE or cerebrovascular disease.
f A subset of the events was combined in a “global index,”
defined as the earliest occurrence of CHD events, invasive breast cancer,
stroke, pulmonary embolism, colorectal cancer, hip fracture, or death
due to other causes. |
For those outcomes included in the WHI “global index” that reached
statistical significance, the absolute excess risk per 10,000 women-years in
the group treated with CE alone were 12 more strokes while the absolute risk
reduction per 10,000 women-years was 6 fewer hip fractures. The absolute excess
risk of events included in the “global index” was a nonsignificant
2 events per 10,000 women-years. There was no difference between the groups
in terms of all-cause mortality. (See BOXED WARNINGS,
WARNINGS, and PRECAUTIONS.)
Final centrally adjudicated results for CHD events and
centrally adjudicated results for invasive breast cancer incidence from the
estrogen alone substudy, after an average follow-up of 7.1 years, reported no
overall difference for primary CHD events (nonfatal MI, silent MI and CHD
death) and invasive breast cancer incidence in women receiving CE alone
compared with placebo (see Table 9).
Centrally adjudicated results for stroke events from the
estrogen alone substudy, after an average follow-up of 7.1 years, reported no
significant difference in distribution of stroke subtype or severity, including
fatal strokes, in women receiving CE alone compared to placebo. Estrogen alone
increased the risk of ischemic stroke, and this excess was present in all
subgroups of women examined (see Table 9).
Women's Health Initiative Memory Study
The estrogen plus progestin Women's Health Initiative Memory
Study (WHIMS), a substudy of WHI, enrolled 4,532 predominantly healthy
postmenopausal women 65 years of age and older (47 percent, age 65 to 69 years;
35 percent, 70 to 74 years; 18 percent, 75 years of age and older) to evaluate
the effects of daily CE/MPA 0.625 mg conjugated estrogens/2.5 mg
medroxyprogesterone acetate on the incidence of probable dementia (primary
outcome) compared with placebo.
After an average follow-up of 4 years, 40 women in the estrogen plus progestin
group (45 per 10,000 women-years) and 21 in the placebo group (22 per 10,000
women-years) were diagnosed with probable dementia. The relative risk of probable
dementia in the hormone therapy group was 2.05 (95 percent CI 1.21–3.48) compared
to placebo. It is unknown whether these findings apply to younger postmenopausal
women. (See BOXED WARNINGS, WARNINGS,
Dementia and PRECAUTIONS, Geriatric
Use.)
The estrogen alone WHIMS substudy enrolled 2,947
predominantly healthy postmenopausal women 65 years of age and older (45
percent, age 65 to 69 years; 36 percent, 70 to 74 years; 19 percent, 75 years
of age and older) to evaluate the effects of daily CE 0.625 mg on the incidence
of probable dementia (primary outcome) compared with placebo.
After an average follow-up of 5.2 years, 28 women in the estrogen alone group
(37 per 10,000 women-years) and 19 in the placebo group (25 per 10,000 women-years)
were diagnosed with probable dementia. The relative risk of probable dementia
in the estrogen alone group was 1.49 (95 percent CI 0.83–2.66) compared to placebo.
It is unknown whether these findings apply to younger postmenopausal women.
(See BOXED WARNINGS, WARNINGS,
Dementia and PRECAUTIONS, Geriatric
Use.)
When data from the two populations were pooled as planned in the WHIMS protocol,
the reported overall relative risk for probable dementia was 1.76 (95 percent
CI 1.19-2.60). Differences between groups became apparent in the first year
of treatment. It is unknown whether these findings apply to younger postmenopausal
women. (See BOXED WARNINGS, WARNINGS,
Dementia and PRECAUTIONS, Geriatric
Use.)
Last updated on RxList: 6/24/2009