Healthy Resources
Featured Centers
- Eating Out? Cut Calories, Heartburn
- 5 Good Ways to Save Money on Medicine
- 8 Ways to Treat Your Allergies
The kidneys play a key role in keeping a person's blood pressure in a healthy range, and blood pressure, in turn, can affect the health of the kidneys. High blood pressure, also called hypertension, can damage the kidneys and lead to chronic kidney disease (CKD).
Blood pressure measures the force of blood against the walls of the blood vessels. Extra fluid in the body increases the amount of fluid in blood vessels and makes blood pressure higher. Narrow, stiff, or clogged blood vessels also raise blood pressure.
Hypertension can result from too much fluid in normal blood vessels or from normal fluid in narrow, stiff, or clogged blood vessels.
People with high blood pressure should see their doctor regularly.
High blood pressure makes the heart work...
|
|
The following serious and otherwise important adverse drug reactions are discussed in greater detail in other sections of labeling:
Because clinical trials are conducted under widely varying conditions, adverse reaction rates observed in the clinical trials of a drug cannot be directly compared to rates in the clinical trials of another drug and may not reflect the rates observed in practice. In addition, the clinical trials were not designed to establish comparative differences across study arms with regards to the adverse reactions discussed below.
The incidence of adverse reactions was determined in three randomized kidney transplant trials. One of the trials used azathioprine (AZA) and corticosteroids and two of the trials used mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and corticosteroids concomitantly for maintenance immunosuppression.
Prograf-based immunosuppression in conjunction with azathioprine and corticosteroids following kidney transplantation was assessed in trial where 205 patients received Prograf based immunosuppression and 207 patients received cyclosporine based immunosuppression. The trial population had a mean age of 43 years (mean ± sd was 43 ± 13 years on Prograf and 44 ± 12 years on cyclosporine arm), the distribution was 61% male, and the composition was White (58%), Black (25%), Hispanic (12%) and Other (5%). The 12 month post-transplant information from this trial is presented below.
The most common adverse reactions ( ≥ 30%) observed in Prograf-treated kidney transplant patients are: infection, tremor, hypertension, abnormal renal function, constipation, diarrhea, headache, abdominal pain, insomnia, nausea, hypomagnesemia, urinary tract infection, hypophosphatemia, peripheral edema, asthenia, pain, hyperlipidemia, hyperkalemia and anemia.
Adverse reactions that occurred in ≥ 15% of kidney transplant patients treated with Prograf in conjunction with azathioprine are presented below:
Table 4. Kidney Transplantation: Adverse Reactions Occurring
in ≥ 15% of Patients Treated with Prograf in Conjunction with Azathioprine
(AZA)
| Prograf/AZA (N=205) |
Cyclosporine/AZA (N=207) |
|
| Nervous System | ||
| Tremor | 54% | 34% |
| Headache | 44% | 38% |
| Insomnia | 32% | 30% |
| Paresthesia | 23% | 16% |
| Dizziness | 19% | 16% |
| Gastrointestinal | ||
| Diarrhea | 44% | 41% |
| Nausea | 38% | 36% |
| Constipation | 35% | 43% |
| Vomiting | 29% | 23% |
| Dyspepsia | 28% | 20% |
| Cardiovascular | ||
| Hypertension | 50% | 52% |
| Chest Pain | 19% | 13% |
| Uroeenital | ||
| Creatinine Increased | 45% | 42% |
| Urinary Tract Infection | 34% | 35% |
| Metabolic and Nutritional | ||
| Hypophosphatemia | 49% | 53% |
| Hypomagnesemia | 34% | 17% |
| Hyperlipemia | 31% | 38% |
| Hyperkalemia | 31% | 32% |
| Diabetes Mellitus | 24% | 9% |
| Hypokalemia | 22% | 25% |
| Hyperglycemia | 22% | 16% |
| Edema | 18% | 19% |
| Hemic and Lymphatic | ||
| Anemia | 30% | 24% |
| Leukopenia | 15% | 17% |
| Miscellaneous | ||
| Infection | 45% | 49% |
| Peripheral Edema | 36% | 48% |
| Asthenia | 34% | 30% |
| Abdominal Pain | 33% | 31% |
| Pain | 32% | 30% |
| Fever | 29% | 29% |
| Back Pain | 24% | 20% |
| Respiratory System | ||
| Dyspnea | 22% | 18% |
| Cough Increased | 18% | 15% |
| Musculoskeletal | ||
| Arthralgia | 25% | 24% |
| Skin | ||
| Rash | 17% | 12% |
| Pruritus | 15% | 7% |
Two trials were conducted for Prograf-based immunosuppression in conjunction with MMF and corticosteroids. In the non-US trial (Study 1), the incidence of adverse reactions was based on 1195 kidney transplant patients that received Prograf (Group C, n=403), or one of two cyclosporine (CsA) regimens (Group A, n=384 and Group B, n=408) in combination with MMF and corticosteroids; all patients, except those in one of the two cyclosporine groups, also received induction with daclizumab. The trial population had a mean age of 46 years (range 17 to 76), the distribution was 65% male, and the composition was 93% Caucasian. The 12 month post-transplant information from this trial is presented below.
Adverse reactions that occurred in ≥ 10% of kidney transplant patients treated with Prograf in conjunction with MMF in Study 1 [Note: This trial was conducted entirely outside of the United States. Such trials often report a lower incidence of adverse reactions in comparison to U.S. trials] are presented below:
Table 5. Kidney Transplantation: Adverse Reactions Occurring
in ≥ 10% of Patients Treated with Prograf in Conjunction with MMF (Study
1)
| Prograf (Group C) (N=403) |
Cyclosporine (Group A) (N=384) |
Cyclosporine (Group B) (N=408) |
|
| Diarrhea | 25% | 16% | 13% |
| Urinary Tract Infection | 24% | 28% | 24% |
| Anemia | 17% | 19% | 17% |
| Hypertension | 13% | 14% | 12% |
| Leukopenia | 13% | 10% | 10% |
| Edema Peripheral | 11% | 12% | 13% |
| Hyperlipidemia | 10% | 15% | 13% |
| Key: Group A = CsA/MMF/CS, B = CsA/MMF/CS/Daclizumab, C =Tac/MMF/CS/Daclizumab CsA = Cyclosporine, CS = Corticosteroids, Tac = Tacrolimus, MMF = mycophenolate mofetil |
|||
In the U.S. trial (Study 2) with Prograf-based immunosuppression in conjunction with MMF and corticosteroids, 424 kidney transplant patients received Prograf (n=212) or cyclosporine (n=212) in combination with MMF 1 gram twice daily, basiliximab induction, and corticosteroids. The trial population had a mean age of 48 years (range 17 to 77), the distribution was 63% male, and the composition was White (74%), Black (20%), Asian (3%) and other (3%). The 12 month post-transplant information from this trial is presented below.
Adverse reactions that occurred in ≥ 15% of kidney transplant patients treated with Prograf in conjunction with MMF in Study 2 are presented below:
Table 6. Kidney Transplantation: Adverse Reactions Occurring
in ≥ 15% of Patients Treated with Prograf in Conjunction with MMF (Study
2)
| Prograf/MMF (N=212) |
Cyclosporine/MMF (N=212) |
|
| Gastrointestinal Disorders | ||
| Diarrhea | 44% | 26% |
| Nausea | 39% | 47% |
| Constipation | 36% | 41% |
| Vomiting | 26% | 25% |
| Dyspepsia | 18% | 15% |
| Injury, Poisoning, and Procedural Complications | ||
| Post-Procedural Pain | 29% | 27% |
| Incision Site Complication | 28% | 23% |
| Graft Dysfunction | 24% | 18% |
| Metabolism and Nutrition Disorders | ||
| Hypomagnesemia | 28% | 22% |
| Hypophosphatemia | 28% | 21% |
| Hyperkalemia | 26% | 19% |
| Hyperglycemia | 21% | 15% |
| Hyperlipidemia | 18% | 25% |
| Hypokalemia | 16% | 18% |
| Nervous Svstem Disorders | ||
| Tremor | 34% | 20% |
| Headache | 24% | 25% |
| Blood and Lymphatic Svstem Disorders | ||
| Anemia | 30% | 28% |
| Leukopenia | 16% | 12% |
| Miscellaneous | ||
| Edema Peripheral | 35% | 46% |
| Hypertension | 32% | 35% |
| Insomnia | 30% | 21% |
| Urinary Tract Infection | 26% | 22% |
| Blood Creatinine Increased | 23% | 23% |
Less frequently observed adverse reactions in both liver transplantation and kidney transplantation patients are described under the subsection Less Frequently Reported Adverse Reactions.
There were two randomized comparative liver transplant trials. In the U.S. trial, 263 adult and pediatric patients received tacrolimus and steroids and 266 patients received cyclosporine-based immunosuppressive regimen (CsA/AZA). The trial population had a mean age of 44 years (range 0.4 to70), the distribution was 52% male, and the composition was White (78%), Black (5%), Asian (2%), Hispanic (13%) and Other (2%). In the European trial, 270 patients received tacrolimus and steroids and 275 patients received CsA/AZA. The trial population had a mean age of 46 years (range 15 to 68), the distribution was 59% male, and the composition was White (95.4%), Black (1%), Asian (2%) and Other (2%).
The proportion of patients reporting more than one adverse event was > 99% in both the tacrolimus group and the CsA/AZA group. Precautions must be taken when comparing the incidence of adverse reactions in the U.S. trial to that in the European trial. The 12-month post-transplant information from the U.S. trial and from the European trial is presented below. The two trials also included different patient populations and patients were treated with immunosuppressive regimens of differing intensities. Adverse reactions reported in ≥ 15% in tacrolimus patients (combined trial results) are presented below for the two controlled trials in liver transplantation.
The most common adverse reactions ( ≥ 40%) observed in Prograf-treated liver transplant patients are: tremor, headache, diarrhea, hypertension, nausea, abnormal renal function, abdominal pain, insomnia, paresthesia, anemia, pain, fever, asthenia, hyperkalemia, hypomagnesemia, and hyperglycemia. These all occur with oral and IV administration of Prograf and some may respond to a reduction in dosing (e.g., tremor, headache, paresthesia, hypertension). Diarrhea was sometimes associated with other gastrointestinal complaints such as nausea and vomiting.
Table 7. Liver Transplantation: Adverse Reactions Occurring
in ≥ 15% of Patients Treated with Prograf
| U.S. TRIAL | EUROPEAN TRIAL | |||
| Prograf (N=250) |
Cyclosporine/AZA (N=250) |
Prograf (N=264) |
Cyclosporine/AZA (N=265) |
|
| Nervous System | ||||
| Headache | 64% | 60% | 37% | 26% |
| Insomnia | 64% | 68% | 32% | 23% |
| Tremor | 56% | 46% | 48% | 32% |
| Paresthesia | 40% | 30% | 17% | 17% |
| Gastrointestinal | ||||
| Diarrhea | 72% | 47% | 37% | 27% |
| Nausea | 46% | 37% | 32% | 27% |
| LFT Abnormal | 36% | 30% | 6% | 5% |
| Anorexia | 34% | 24% | 7% | 5% |
| Vomiting | 27% | 15% | 14% | 11% |
| Constipation | 24% | 27% | 23% | 21% |
| Cardiovascular | ||||
| Hypertension | 47% | 56% | 38% | 43% |
| Urogenital | ||||
| Kidney Function Abnormal | 40% | 27% | 36% | 23% |
| Creatinine Increased | 39% | 25% | 24% | 19% |
| BUN Increased | 30% | 22% | 12% | 9% |
| Oliguria | 18% | 15% | 19% | 12% |
| Urinary Tract Infection | 16% | 18% | 21% | 19% |
| Metabolic and Nutritional | ||||
| Hypomagnesemia | 48% | 45% | 16% | 9% |
| Hyperglycemia | 47% | 38% | 33% | 22% |
| Hyperkalemia | 45% | 26% | 13% | 9% |
| Hypokalemia | 29% | 34% | 13% | 16% |
| Hemic and Lymphatic | ||||
| Anemia | 47% | 38% | 5% | 1% |
| Leukocytosis | 32% | 26% | 8% | 8% |
| Thrombocytopenia | 24% | 20% | 14% | 19% |
| Miscellaneous | ||||
| Pain | 63% | 57% | 24% | 22% |
| Abdominal Pain | 59% | 54% | 29% | 22% |
| Asthenia | 52% | 48% | 11% | 7% |
| Fever | 48% | 56% | 19% | 22% |
| Back Pain | 30% | 29% | 17% | 17% |
| Ascites | 27% | 22% | 7% | 8% |
| Peripheral Edema | 26% | 26% | 12% | 14% |
| Respiratory System | ||||
| Pleural Effusion | 30% | 32% | 36% | 35% |
| Dyspnea | 29% | 23% | 5% | 4% |
| Atelectasis | 28% | 30% | 5% | 4% |
| Skin and Appendages | ||||
| Pruritus | 36% | 20% | 15% | 7% |
| Rash | 24% | 19% | 10% | 4% |
Less frequently observed adverse reactions in both liver transplantation and kidney transplantation patients are described under the subsection Less Frequently Reported Adverse Reactions.
The incidence of adverse reactions was determined based on two trials in primary orthotopic heart transplantation. In a trial conducted in Europe, 314 patients received a regimen of antibody induction, corticosteroids and azathioprine (AZA) in combination with Prograf (n=157) or cyclosporine (n=157) for 18 months. The trial population had a mean age of 51 years (range 18 to 65), the distribution was 82% male, and the composition was White (96%), Black (3%) and other (1%).
The most common adverse reactions ( ≥ 15%) observed in Prograf-treated heart transplant patients are: abnormal renal function, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, CMV infection, tremor, hyperglycemia, leukopenia, infection, anemia, bronchitis, pericardial effusion, urinary tract infection and hyperlipemia. Adverse reactions in heart transplant patients in the European trial are presented below:
Table 8. Heart Transplantation: Adverse Reactions Occurring
in ≥ 15% of Patients Treated with Prograf in Conjunction with Azathioprine
(AZA)
| Prograf/AZA (n=157) |
Cyclosporine/AZA (n=157) |
|
| Cardiovascular System | ||
| Hypertension | 62% | 69% |
| Pericardial Effusion | 15% | 14% |
| Body as a Whole | ||
| CMV Infection | 32% | 30% |
| Infection | 24% | 21% |
| Metabolic and Nutritional Disorders | ||
| Diabetes Mellitus | 26% | 16% |
| Hyperglycemia | 23% | 17% |
| Hyperlipemia | 18% | 27% |
| Hemic and Lymphatic System | ||
| Anemia | 50% | 36% |
| Leukopenia | 48% | 39% |
| Urogenital System | ||
| Kidney Function Abnormal | 56% | 57% |
| Urinary Tract Infection | 16% | 12% |
| Respiratory System | ||
| Bronchitis | 17% | 18% |
| Nervous System | ||
| Tremor | 15% | 6% |
In the European trial, the cyclosporine trough concentrations were above the pre-defined target range (i.e., 100 to 200 ng/mL) at Day 122 and beyond in 32 to 68% of the patients in the cyclosporine treatment arm, whereas the tacrolimus trough concentrations were within the pre-defined target range (i.e., 5 to 15 ng/mL) in 74 to 86% of the patients in the tacrolimus treatment arm.
In a U.S. trial, the incidence of adverse reactions was based on 331 heart transplant patients that received corticosteroids and Prograf in combination with sirolimus (n=109), Prograf in combination with MMF (n=107) or cyclosporine modified in combination with MMF (n=l 15) for 1 year. The trial population had a mean age of 53 years (range 18 to 75), the distribution was 78% male, and the composition was White (83%), Black (13%) and other (4%).
Only selected targeted treatment-emergent adverse reactions were collected in the U.S. heart transplantation trial. Those reactions that were reported at a rate of 15% or greater in patients treated with Prograf and MMF include the following: any target adverse reactions (99%), hypertension (89%), hyperglycemia requiring antihyperglycemic therapy (70%), hypertriglyceridemia (65%), anemia (hemoglobin < 10.0 g/dL) (65%), fasting blood glucose > 140 mg/dL (on two separate occasions) (61%), hypercholesterolemia (57%), hyperlipidemia (34%), WBCs < 3000 cells/mcL (34%), serious bacterial infections (30%), magnesium < 1.2 mEq/L (24%), platelet count < 75,000 cells/mcL (19%), and other opportunistic infections (15%).
Other targeted treatment-emergent adverse reactions in Prograf-treated patients occurred at a rate of less than 15%, and include the following: Cushingoid features, impaired wound healing, hyperkalemia, Candida infection, and CMV infection/syndrome.
New Onset Diabetes After Transplant (NODAT) is defined as a composite of fasting plasma glucose ≥ 126 mg/dL, HbA1c ≥ 6%, insulin use ≥ 30 days or oral hypoglycemic use. In a trial in kidney transplant patients (Study 2), NODAT was observed in 75% in the Prograf-treated and 61% in the Neoral-treated patients without pre-transplant history of diabetes mellitus (Table 9) [see Clinical Studies].
Table 9. Incidence of New Onset Diabetes After Transplant
at 1 year in Kidney Transplant Recipients in a Phase 3 Trial (Study 2)
| Parameter | Treatment Group | |
| Prograf/MMF (n = 212) |
Neoral/MMF (n = 212) |
|
| NODAT | 112/150(75%) | 93/152 (61%) |
| Fasting Plasma Glucose ≥ 126 mg/dL | 96/150 (64%) | 80/152 (53%) |
| HbA1C ≥ 6% | 59/150 (39%) | 28/152 (18%) |
| Insulin Use ≥ 30 days | 9/150(6%) | 4/152 (3%) |
| Oral Hypoglycemic Use | 15/150 (10%) | 5/152 (3%) |
In early trials of Prograf, Post-Transplant Diabetes Mellitus (PTDM) was evaluated with a more limited criteria of "use of insulin for 30 or more consecutive days with < 5 day gap" in patients without a prior history of insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus or non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus. Data are presented in Tables 10 to 13. PTDM was reported in 20% of Prograf/Azathioprine (AZA)-treated kidney transplant patients without pre-transplant history of diabetes mellitus in a Phase 3 trial (Table 10). The median time to onset of PTDM was 68 days. Insulin dependence was reversible in 15% of these PTDM patients at one year and in 50% at 2 years post-transplant. Black and Hispanic kidney transplant patients were at an increased risk of development of PTDM (Table 11).
Table 10. Incidence of Post-Transplant Diabetes Mellitus
and Insulin Use at 2 Years in Kidney Transplant Recipients in a Phase 3 Trial
using Azathioprine (AZA)
| Status of PTDMa | Prograf/AZA | CsA/AZA |
| Patients without pre-transplant history of diabetes mellitus | 151 | 151 |
| New onset PTDMa, 1st Year | 30/151 (20%) | 6/151 (4%) |
| Still insulin-dependent at one year in those without prior history of diabetes | 25/151 (17%) | 5/151 (3%) |
| New onset PTDMa post 1 year | 1 | 0 |
| Patients with PTDMa at 2 years | 16/151(11%) | 5/151 (3%) |
| a) Use of insulin for 30 or more consecutive days, with < 5 day gap, without a prior history of insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus or non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus. | ||
Table 11. Development of Post-Transplant Diabetes Mellitus
by Race or Ethnicity and by Treatment Group During First Year Post Kidney Transplantation
in a Phase 3 Trial
| Patient Race | Patients Who Developed PTDMa | |
| Prograf | Cyclosporine | |
| Black | 15/41 (37%) | 3 (8%) |
| Hispanic | 5/17 (29%) | 1 (6%) |
| Caucasian | 10/82 (12%) | 1 d%) |
| Other | 0/11(0%) | 1 (10%) |
| Total | 30/151 (20%) | 6 (4%) |
| a) Use of insulin for 30 or more consecutive days, with < 5 day gap, without a prior history of insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus or non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus. | ||
Insulin-dependent PTDM was reported in 18% and 11% of Prograf-treated liver transplant patients and was reversible in 45% and 31% of these patients at 1 year post-transplant, in the U.S. and European randomized trials, respectively, (Table 12). Hyperglycemia was associated with the use of Prograf in 47% and 33% of liver transplant recipients in the U.S. and European randomized trials, respectively, and may require treatment.
Table 12. Incidence of Post-Transplant Diabetes Mellitus
and Insulin Use at 1 Year in Liver Transplant Recipients
| Status of PTDMa | US Trial | European Trial | ||
| Prograf | Cyclosporine | Prograf | Cyclosporine | |
| Patients at riskb | 239 | 236 | 239 | 249 |
| New Onset PTDMa | 42 (18%) | 30 (13%) | 26(11%) | 12 (5%) |
| Patients still on insulin at 1 year | 23 (10%) | 19 (8%) | 18 (8%) | 6 (2%) |
| a) Use of insulin for 30 or more consecutive days, with <
5 day gap, without a prior history of insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus
or non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus. b) Patients without pre-transplant history of diabetes mellitus. |
||||
Insulin-dependent PTDM was reported in 13% and 22% of Prograf-treated heart transplant patients receiving mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) or azathioprine (AZA) and was reversible in 30% and 17% of these patients at one year post-transplant, in the U.S. and European randomized trials, respectively (Table 13). Hyperglycemia defined as two fasting plasma glucose levels ≥ 126 mg/dL was reported with the use of Prograf plus MMF or AZA in 32% and 35% of heart transplant recipients in the U.S. and European randomized trials, respectively, and may require treatment.
Table 13. Incidence of Post-Transplant Diabetes Mellitus
and Insulin Use at 1 Year in Heart Transplant Recinients
| Status of PTDMa | US Trial | Euro | pean Trial | |
| Prograf/ MMF | Cyclosporine/ MMF | Prograf/ AZA | Cyclosporine/ AZA | |
| Patients at riskb | 75 | 83 | 132 | 138 |
| New Onset PTDMa | 10 (13%) | 6 (7%) | 29 (22%) | 5 (4%) |
| Patients still on insulin at 1 yearc | 7 (9%) | 1 (1%) | 24 (18%) | 4 (3%) |
| a) Use of insulin for 30 or more consecutive days without
a prior history of insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus or non-insulin dependent
diabetes mellitus. b) Patients without pre-transplant history of diabetes mellitus. c) 7-12 months for the U.S. trial. |
||||
The following adverse reactions were reported in either liver, kidney, and/or heart transplant recipients who were treated with tacrolimus in clinical trials.
[see WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS]
Abnormal dreams, agitation, amnesia, anxiety, confusion, convulsion, crying, depression, elevated mood, emotional lability, encephalopathy, haemorrhagic stroke, hallucinations, hypertonia, incoordination, monoparesis, myoclonus, nerve compression, nervousness, neuralgia, neuropathy, paralysis flaccid, psychomotor skills impaired, psychosis, quadriparesis, somnolence, thinking abnormal, vertigo, writing impaired
Abnormal vision, amblyopia, ear pain, otitis media, tinnitus
Cholangitis, cholestatic jaundice, duodenitis, dysphagia, esophagitis, flatulence, gastritis, gastroesophagitis, gastrointestinal hemorrhage, GOT increase, GI disorder, GI perforation, hepatitis, hepatitis granulomatous, ileus, increased appetite, jaundice, liver damage, oesophagitis ulcerative, oral moniliasis, pancreatic pseudocyst, rectal disorder, stomatitis,
Abnormal ECG, angina pectoris, arrhythmia, atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter, bradycardia, cardiac fibrillation, cardiopulmonary failure, cardiovascular disorder, congestive heart failure, deep thrombophlebitis, echocardiogram abnormal, electrocardiogram QRS complex abnormal, electrocardiogram ST segment abnormal, heart failure, heart rate decreased, hemorrhage, hypotension, peripheral vascular disorder, phlebitis, postural hypotension, syncope, tachycardia, thrombosis, vasodilatation
Acute kidney failure [see WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS], albuminuria, BK nephropathy, bladder spasm, cystitis, dysuria, hematuria, hydronephrosis, kidney failure, kidney tubular necrosis, nocturia, pyuria, toxic nephropathy, urge incontinence, urinary frequency, urinary incontinence, urinary retention, vaginitis
Acidosis, alkaline phosphatase increased, alkalosis, ALT (SGPT) increased, AST (SGOT) increased, bicarbonate decreased, bilirubinemia, dehydration, GGT increased, gout, healing abnormal, hypercalcemia, hypercholesterolemia, hyperphosphatemia, hyperuricemia, hypervolemia, hypocalcemia, hypoglycemia, hyponatremia, hypoproteinemia, lactic dehydrogenase increase, weight gain
Cushing's syndrome
Coagulation disorder, ecchymosis, haematocrit increased, haemoglobin abnormal, hypochromic anemia, leukocytosis, polycythemia, prothrombin decreased, serum iron decreased
Abdomen enlarged, abscess, accidental injury, allergic reaction, cellulitis, chills, fall, feeling abnormal, flu syndrome, generalized edema, hernia, mobility decreased, peritonitis, photosensitivity reaction, sepsis, temperature intolerance, ulcer
Arthralgia, cramps, generalized spasm, joint disorder, leg cramps, myalgia, myasthenia, osteoporosis
Asthma, emphysema, hiccups, lung disorder, lung function decreased, pharyngitis, pneumonia, pneumothorax, pulmonary edema, respiratory disorder, rhinitis, sinusitis, voice alteration
Acne, alopecia, exfoliative dermatitis, fungal dermatitis, herpes simplex, herpes zoster, hirsutism, neoplasm skin benign, skin discoloration, skin disorder, skin ulcer, sweating
The following adverse reactions have been reported from worldwide marketing experience with Prograf. Because these reactions are reported voluntarily from a population of uncertain size it is not always possible to reliably estimate their frequency or establish a causal relationship to drug exposure. Decisions to include these reactions in labeling are typically based on one or more of the following factors: (1) seriousness of the reaction, (2) frequency of the reporting, or (3) strength of causal connection to the drug. Other reactions include:
Atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter, cardiac arrhythmia, cardiac arrest, electrocardiogram T wave abnormal, flushing, myocardial infarction, myocardial ischaemia, pericardial effusion, QT prolongation, Torsade de Pointes, venous thrombosis deep limb, ventricular extrasystoles, ventricular fibrillation, myocardial hypertrophy [see WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS].
Bile duct stenosis, colitis, enterocolitis, gastroenteritis, gastrooesophageal reflux disease, hepatic cytolysis, hepatic necrosis, hepatotoxicity, impaired gastric emptying, liver fatty, mouth ulceration, pancreatitis haemorrhagic, pancreatitis necrotizing, stomach ulcer, venoocclusive liver disease
Agranulocytosis, disseminated intravascular coagulation, hemolytic anemia, neutropenia, pancytopenia, thrombocytopenic purpura, thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura, pure red cell aplasia [see WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS]
Cases of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML), sometimes fatal; -polyoma virus-associated nephropathy, (PVAN) including graft loss [see WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS]
Glycosuria, increased amylase including pancreatitis, weight decreased
Feeling hot and cold, feeling jittery, hot flushes, multi-organ failure, primary graft dysfunction
Carpal tunnel syndrome, cerebral infarction, hemiparesis, leukoencephalopathy, mental disorder, mutism, posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES) [see WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS], progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML) [see WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS], quadriplegia, speech disorder, syncope
Acute respiratory distress syndrome, interstitial lung disease, lung infiltration, respiratory distress, respiratory failure
Stevens-Johnson syndrome, toxic epidermal necrolysis
Blindness, blindness cortical, hearing loss including deafness, photophobia
Acute renal failure, cystitis haemorrhagic, hemolytic-uremic syndrome, micturition disorder
Since tacrolimus is metabolized mainly by CYP3A enzymes, drugs or substances known to inhibit these enzymes may increase tacrolimus whole blood concentrations. Drugs known to induce CYP3A enzymes may decrease tacrolimus whole blood concentrations [see WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS and CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY].
With a given dose of mycophenolic acid (MPA) products, exposure to MPA is higher with Prograf co-administration than with cyclosporine co-administration because cyclosporine interrupts the enterohepatic recirculation of MPA while tacrolimus does not. Clinicians should be aware that there is also a potential for increased MPA exposure after crossover from cyclosporine to Prograf in patients concomitantly receiving MPA-containing products.
Grapefruit juice inhibits CYP3A-enzymes resulting in increased tacrolimus whole blood trough concentrations, and patients should avoid eating grapefruit or drinking grapefruit juice with tacrolimus [see DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION].
Most protease inhibitors inhibit CYP3A enzymes and may increase tacrolimus whole blood concentrations. It is recommended to avoid concomitant use of tacrolimus with nelfinavir unless the benefits outweigh the risks [see CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY]. Monitoring of whole blood concentrations and appropriate dosage adjustments of tacrolimus are recommended when tacrolimus and other protease inhibitors (e.g., ritonavir) are used concomitantly.
Frequent monitoring of whole blood concentrations and appropriate dosage adjustments of tacrolimus are recommended when concomitant use of the following antifungal drugs with tacrolimus is initiated or discontinued [see CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY].
Azoles: Voriconazole, posaconazole, itraconazole, ketoconazole, fluconazole and clotrimazole inhibit CYP3A metabolism of tacrolimus and increase tacrolimus whole blood concentrations. When initiating therapy with voriconazole or posaconazole in patients already receiving tacrolimus, it is recommended that the tacrolimus dose be initially reduced to one-third of the original dose and the subsequent tacrolimus doses be adjusted based on the tacrolimus whole blood concentrations.
Caspofungin is an inducer of CYP3A and decreases whole blood concentrations of tacrolimus.
Verapamil, diltiazem, nifedipine, and nicardipine inhibit CYP3A metabolism of tacrolimus and may increase tacrolimus whole blood concentrations. Monitoring of whole blood concentrations and appropriate dosage adjustments of tacrolimus are recommended when these calcium channel blocking drugs and tacrolimus are used concomitantly.
Erythromycin, clarithromycin, troleandomycin and chloramphenicol inhibit CYP3A metabolism of tacrolimus and may increase tacrolimus whole blood concentrations. Monitoring of blood concentrations and appropriate dosage adjustments of tacrolimus are recommended when these drugs and tacrolimus are used concomitantly.
Rifampin [see CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY] and rifabutin are inducers of CYP3A enzymes and may decrease tacrolimus whole blood concentrations. Monitoring of whole blood concentrations and appropriate dosage adjustments of tacrolimus are recommended when these antimycobacterial drugs and tacrolimus are used concomitantly.
Phenytoin, carbamazepine and phenobarbital induce CYP3A enzymes and may decrease tacrolimus whole blood concentrations. Monitoring of whole blood concentrations and appropriate dosage adjustments of tacrolimus are recommended when these drugs and tacrolimus are used concomitantly.
Concomitant administration of phenytoin with tacrolimus may also increase phenytoin plasma concentrations. Thus, frequent monitoring phenytoin plasma concentrations and adjusting the phenytoin dose as needed are recommended when tacrolimus and phenytoin are administered concomitantly.
St. John's Wort induces CYP3A enzymes and may decrease tacrolimus whole blood concentrations. Monitoring of whole blood concentrations and appropriate dosage adjustments of tacrolimus are recommended when St. John's Wort and tacrolimus are co-administered.
Lansoprazole and omeprazole, as CYP2C19 and CYP3A4 substrates, may potentially inhibit the CYP3A4 metabolism of tacrolimus and thereby substantially increase tacrolimus whole blood concentrations, especially in transplant patients who are intermediate or poor CYP2C19 metabolizers, as compared to those patients who are efficient CYP2C19 metabolizers. Cimetidine may also inhibit the CYP3A4 metabolism of tacrolimus and thereby substantially increase tacrolimus whole blood concentrations.
Coadministration with magnesium and aluminum hydroxide antacids increase tacrolimus whole blood concentrations [see CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY]. Monitoring of whole blood concentrations and appropriate dosage adjustments of tacrolimus are recommended when these drugs and tacrolimus are used concomitantly.
Bromocriptine, nefazodone, metoclopramide, danazol, ethinyl estradiol and methylprednisolone may inhibit CYP3A metabolism of tacrolimus and increase tacrolimus whole blood concentrations. Monitoring of blood concentrations and appropriate dosage adjustments of tacrolimus are recommended when these drugs and tacrolimus are co-administered.
Last reviewed on RxList: 3/16/2012
This monograph has been modified to include the generic and brand name in many instances.
Report Problems to the Food and Drug Administration
You are encouraged to report negative side effects of prescription drugs to the FDA. Visit the FDA MedWatch website or call 1-800-FDA-1088.
Find out what women really need.