General
Interferons are a family of naturally occurring proteins that are produced
by eukaryotic cells in response to viral infection and other biological inducers.
Interferons possess immunomodulatory, antiviral and antiproliferative biological
activities. They exert their biological effects by binding to specific receptors
on the surface of cells. Three major groups of interferons have been distinguished:
alpha, beta, and gamma. Interferons alpha and beta form the Type I interferons
and interferon gamma is a Type II interferon. Type I interferons have considerably
overlapping but also distinct biological activities. Interferon beta is produced
naturally by various cell types including fibroblasts and macrophages. Binding
of interferon beta to its receptors initiates a complex cascade of intracellular
events that leads to the expression of numerous interferon-induced gene products
and markers, including 2', 5'-oligoadenylate synthetase, beta 2-microglobulin
and neopterin, which may mediate some of the biological activities. The specific
interferon-induced proteins and mechanisms by which interferon beta-1a exerts
its effects in multiple sclerosis have not been fully defined.
Pharmacokinetics
The pharmacokinetics of Rebif® (interferon beta-1a) in people with multiple
sclerosis have not been evaluated. In healthy volunteer subjects, a single subcutaneous
(sc) injection of 60 mcg of Rebif® (liquid formulation), resulted in a peak
serum concentration (Cmax) of 5.1 ± 1.7 IU/mL (mean ± SD), with
a median time of peak serum concentration (Tmax) of 16 hours. The serum elimination
half-life (t1/2) was 69 ± 37 hours, and the area under the serum concentration
versus time curve (AUC) from zero to 96 hours was 294 ± 81 IU•h/mL.
Following every other day sc injections in healthy volunteer subjects, an increase
in AUC of approximately 240% was observed, suggesting that accumulation of interferon
beta-1a occurs after repeat administration. Total clearance is approximately
33-55 L/hour. There have been no observed gender-related effects on pharmacokinetic
parameters. Pharmacokinetics of Rebif® in pediatric and geriatric patients
or patients with renal or hepatic insufficiency have not been established.
Pharmacodynamics
Biological response markers (e.g., 2',5'-OAS activity, neopterin and beta 2-microglobulin)
are induced by interferon beta-1a following parenteral doses administered to
healthy volunteer subjects and to patients with multiple sclerosis. Following
a single sc administration of 60 mcg of Rebif® intracellular 2',5'-OAS activity
peaked between 12 to 24 hours and beta-2-microglobulin and neopterin serum concentrations
showed a maximum at approximately 24 to 48 hours. All three markers remained
elevated for up to four days. Administration of Rebif 22 mcg three times per
week (tiw) inhibited mitogen-induced release of pro-inflammatory cytokines (IFN-γ,
IL-1, IL-6, TNF-α and TNF-β) by peripheral blood mononuclear cells
that, on average, was near double that observed with Rebif® administered
once per week (qw) at either 22 or 66 mcg.
The relationships between serum interferon beta-1a levels and measurable pharmacodynamic
activities to the mechanism(s) by which Rebif® exerts its effects in multiple
sclerosis are unknown. No gender-related effects on pharmacodynamic parameters
have been observed.
Clinical Studies
Two multicenter studies evaluated the safety and efficacy of Rebif® in
patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.
Study 1 was a randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled study in patients
with multiple sclerosis for at least one year, Kurtzke Expanded Disability Status
Scale (EDSS) scores ranging from 0 to 5, and at least 2 acute exacerbations
in the previous 2 years.(1) Patients with secondary progressive multiple
sclerosis were excluded from the study. Patients received sc injections of either
placebo (n = 187), Rebif® 22 mcg (n = 189), or Rebif® 44 mcg (n = 184)
administered tiw for two years. Doses of study agents were progressively increased
to their target doses during the first 4 to 8 weeks for each patient in the
study (see DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION).
The primary efficacy endpoint was the number of clinical exacerbations. Numerous
secondary efficacy endpoints were also evaluated and included exacerbation-related
parameters, effects of treatment on progression of disability and magnetic resonance
imaging (MRI)-related parameters. Progression of disability was defined as an
increase in the EDSS score of at least 1 point sustained for at least 3 months.
Neurological examinations were completed every 3 months, during suspected exacerbations,
and coincident with MRI scans. All patients underwent proton density T2-weighted
(PD/T2) MRI scans at baseline and every 6 months. A subset of 198 patients underwent
PD/T2 and T1-weighted gadolinium-enhanced (Gd)-MRI scans monthly for the first
9 months. Of the 560 patients enrolled, 533 (95%) provided 2 years of data and
502 (90%) received 2 years of study agent.
Study results are shown in Table 1 and Figure 1. Rebif® at doses of 22
mcg and 44 mcg administered sc tiw significantly reduced the number of exacerbations
per patient as compared to placebo. Differences between the 22 mcg and 44 mcg
groups were not significant (p > 0.05).
The exact relationship between MRI findings and the clinical status of patients
is unknown. Changes in lesion area often do not correlate with changes in disability
progression. The prognostic significance of the MRI findings in these studies
has not been evaluated.
Table 1: Clinical and MRI Endpoints from Study 1
| |
Placebo
n = 187 |
22 mcg tiw
n = 189 |
44 mcg tiw
n = 184 |
| Exacerbation-related |
| Mean number of exacerbations per patient over 2 years1,2 |
2.56 |
1.82** |
1.73*** |
| (Percent reduction) |
|
(29%) |
(32%) |
| Percent (%) of patients exacerbation-free at 2 years3 |
15% |
25%* |
32%*** |
| Median time to first exacerbation (months)1,4 |
4.5 |
7.6** |
9.6*** |
| MRI |
n = 172 |
n = 171 |
n = 171 |
| Median percent (%) change of MRI PD-T2 lesion area at 2 years5 |
11.0 |
-1.2*** |
-3.8*** |
| Median number of active lesions per patient per scan (PD/T2; 6 monthly)5 |
2.25 |
0.75*** |
0.5*** |
* p < 0.05 compared to placebo
** p < 0.001 compared to placebo
*** p < 0.0001 compared to placebo
(1) Intent-to-treat analysis
(2) Poisson regression model adjusted for center and time on study
(3) Logistic regression adjusted for center. Patients lost to follow-up
prior to an exacerbation were excluded from this analysis (n = 185, 183,
and 184 for the placebo, 22 mcg tiw, and 44 mcg tiw groups, respectively)
(4) Cox proportional hazard model adjusted for center
(5) ANOVA on ranks adjusted for center. Patients with missing scans were
excluded from this analysis |
The time to onset of progression in disability sustained for three months was
significantly longer in patients treated with Rebif® than in placebo-treated
patients. The Kaplan-Meier estimates of the proportions of patients with sustained
disability are depicted in Figure 1.
Figure 1: Proportions of Patients with Sustained Disability
Progression
The safety and efficacy of treatment with Rebif® beyond 2 years have not
been established.
Study 2 was a randomized, open-label, evaluator-blinded, active comparator
study.(2) Patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis with
EDSS scores ranging from 0 to 5.5, and at least 2 exacerbations in the previous
2 years were eligible for inclusion. Patients with secondary progressive multiple
sclerosis were excluded from the study. Patients were randomized to treatment
with Rebif® 44 mcg tiw by sc injection (n=339) or Avonex® 30 mcg qw
by intramuscular (im) injection (n=338). Study duration was 48 weeks.
The primary efficacy endpoint was the proportion of patients who remained exacerbation-free
at 24 weeks. The principal secondary endpoint was the mean number per patient
per scan of combined unique active MRI lesions through 24 weeks, defined as
any lesion that was T1 active or T2 active. Neurological examinations were performed
every three months by a neurologist blinded to treatment assignment. Patient
visits were conducted monthly, and mid-month telephone contacts were made to
inquire about potential exacerbations. If an exacerbation was suspected, the
patient was evaluated with a neurological examination. MRI scans were performed
monthly and analyzed in a treatment–blinded manner. Patients treated with Rebif®
44 mcg sc tiw were more likely to remain relapse-free at 24 and 48 weeks than
were patients treated with Avonex® 30 mcg im qw (Table 2). This study does
not support any conclusion regarding effects on the accumulation of physical
disability.
Table 2: Clinical and MRI Results from Study 2
| |
Rebif® |
Avonex® |
Absolute Difference |
Risk of relapse on Rebif® relative to
Avonex® |
| Relapses |
N=339 |
N=338 |
|
|
| Proportion of patients relapse-free at 24 weeks1 |
75%* |
63% |
12%
(95% CI: 5%, 19%) |
0.68
(95% CI: 0.54, 0.86) |
| Proportion of patients relapse-free at 48 weeks |
62%** |
52% |
10%
(95%CI: 2%, 17%) |
0.81
(95%CI: 0.68, 0.96) |
| MRI (through 24 weeks) |
N=325 |
N=325 |
|
| Median of the mean number of combined unique MRI lesions per patient
per scan2(25th, 75th percentiles) |
0.17*
(0.00, 0.67) |
0.33
(0.00, 1.25) |
* p < 0.001, and ** p = 0.009, Rebif®
compared to Avonex®
(1) Logistic regression model adjusted for treatment and center, intent
to treat analysis
(2) Nonparametric ANCOVA model adjusted for treatment and center, with
baseline combined unique lesions as the single covariate. |
The adverse reactions over 48 weeks were generally similar between the two
treatment groups. Exceptions included injection site disorders (83% of patients
on Rebif® vs. 28% of patients on Avonex®), hepatic function disorders
(18% on Rebif® vs. 10% on Avonex®), and leukopenia (6% on Rebif®
vs. < 1% on Avonex®), which were observed with greater frequency in the
Rebif® group compared to the Avonex® group.
REFERENCES
1. PRISMS Study Group. Randomized double-blind placebo-controlled
study of interferon β-1a in relapsing/remitting multiple sclerosis. Lancet
1998; 352: 1498-1504.
2. Panitch H, Goodin DS, Francis G, et al. Randomized, comparative
study of interferon β-1a treatment in regimens in MS. The EVIDENCE Trial.
Neurology 2002; 59:1496-1506.
Last updated on RxList: 12/18/2008