General: Retavase® is a recombinant plasminogen activator which
catalyzes the cleavage of endogenous plasminogen to generate plasmin. Plasmin
in turn degrades the fibrin matrix of the thrombus, thereby exerting its thrombolytic
action.1,2 In a controlled trial, 36 of 56 patients treated for an
acute myocardial infarction (AMI) had a decrease in fibrinogen levels to below
100 mg/dL by 2 hours following the administration of Retavase® as a double-bolus
intravenous injection (10 + 10 unit) in which 10 units (17.4 mg) was followed
30 minutes later by a second bolus of 10 units (17.4 mg).3 The mean
fibrinogen level returned to the baseline value by 48 hours.
Pharmacokinetics: Based on the measurement of thrombolytic activity,
Retavase® is cleared from plasma at a rate of 250-450 mL/min, with an effective
half-life of 13-16 minutes.Retavase® is cleared primarily by the liver and
kidney.
Clinical Studies: The safety and efficacy of Retavase® were evaluated
in three controlled clinical trials in which Retavase® was compared to other
thrombolytic agents. The INJECT study was designed to assess the relative effects
of Retavase® or the Streptase® brand of Streptokinase upon mortality
rates at 35 days following an AMI.The other studies (RAPID 1 and RAPID 2) were
arteriographic studies which compared the effect on coronary patency of Retavase®
to two regimens of Alteplase (a tissue plasminogen activator; Activase®
in the USA and Actilyse® in Europe) in patients with an AMI.In all three
studies, patients were treated with aspirin (initial doses of 160 mg to 350
mg and subsequent doses of 75 mg to 350 mg) and heparin (a 5,000 unit IV bolus
prior to the administration of Retavase®, followed by a 1000 unit/hour continuous
IV infusion for at least 24 hours).3,4,5 The safety and efficacy
of Retavase® have not been evaluated using antithrombotic or antiplatelet
regimens other than those described above.
Retavase® (10 + 10 unit) was compared to Streptokinase (1.5 million units
over 60 minutes) in a double-blind, randomized, European study (INJECT), which
studied 6,010 patients treated within 12 hours of the onset of symptoms of AMI.To
be eligible for enrollment, patients had to have chest pain consistent with
coronary ischemia and ST segment elevation, or a bundle branch block pattern
on the EKG. Patients with known cerebrovascular or other bleeding risks or those
with a systolic blood pressure >200 mm Hg or a diastolic blood pressure >100
mm Hg were excluded from enrollment. The results of the primary endpoint (mortality
at 35 days), six month mortality and selected other 35 day endpoints are shown
in Table 1 for patients receiving study medications.
Table 1: INJECT TRIAL Incidence of Selected Outcomes
| Endpoint |
Retavase®
n = 2,965 |
Streptokinase
n = 2,971 |
Retavase®-Streptokinase difference (95% CI) |
p Value |
| 35 Day mortality |
8.9% |
9.4% |
-0.5 (-2.0,0.9) |
0.49* |
| 6 Month mortality† |
11.0% |
12.1% |
-1.1 (-2.7,0.6) |
0.22 |
| Combined outcome of 35 day mortality or nonfatal stroke within 35 days |
9.6% |
10.2% |
-0.6 (-2.1,1.0) |
0.47 |
| Heart failure |
24.8% |
28.1% |
-3.3 (-5.6,-1.1) |
0.004 |
| Cardiogenic shock |
4.6% |
5.8% |
-1.2 (-2.4,-0.1) |
0.03 |
| Any stroke |
1.4% |
1.1% |
0.3 (-0.3,0.8) |
0.34 |
| Intracranial hemorrhage |
0.8% |
0.4% |
0.4 (0.0,0.8) |
0.04 |
*p value for the exploratory analysis comparing Retavase®
versus Streptokinase.
†Kaplan-Meier estimates. |
For mortality, stroke and the combined outcome of mortality or stroke, the
95% confidence intervals in Table 1 reflect the range within which the true
difference in outcomes probably lies and includes the possibility of no difference.
The incidences of congestive heart failure and of cardiogenic shock were significantly
lower among patients treated with Retavase® .
The total incidence of stroke was similar between the groups. However, more
patients treated with Retavase® experienced hemorrhagic strokes than patients
treated with Streptokinase. An exploratory analysis indicated that the incidence
of intracranial hemorrhage was higher among older patients or those with elevated
blood pressure. The incidence of intracranial hemorrhage among the 698 patients
treated with Retavase® who were older than 70 years was 2.2%. Intracranial
hemorrhage occurred in 8 of the 332 (2.4%) patients treated with Retavase®
who had an initial systolic blood pressure >160 mm Hg and in 15 of the 2,629
(0.6%) Retavase® patients who had an initial systolic blood pressure <160
mm Hg.
Two arteriographic studies (RAPID 1 and RAPID 2) were performed utilizing open-label
administration of the study agents and a blinded review of the arteriograms.
In RAPID 1, patients were treated within 6 hours of the onset of symptoms, and
in RAPID 2, patients were treated within 12 hours of the onset of symptoms.
Both studies evaluated coronary artery perfusion through the infarct-related
artery 90 minutes after the initiation of therapy as the primary endpoint. Some
patients in each study also had perfusion through the infarct-related artery
evaluated at 60 minutes after the initiation of therapy. In RAPID 1, Retavase®
(in doses of 10 + 10 unit, 15 unit, or 10 + 5 unit) was compared to a 3 hour
regimen of Alteplase (100 mg administered over 3 hrs). In RAPID 2, Retavase®
(10 + 10 unit) was compared to an accelerated regimen of Alteplase (100 mg administered
over 1.5 hrs). The percentages of patients with partial or complete flow (TIMI
grades 2 or 3) and complete flow (TIMI grade 3), are shown along with ventricular
function assessments in Table 2. The follow-up arteriogram was performed at
a median of 8 (RAPID 1) and 5 (RAPID 2) days following the administration of
the thrombolytics. In RAPID 1 the best patency results were obtained with the
10 + 10 unit dose. In RAPID 2, the percentage of patients with partial or complete
flow and the percentage of patients with complete flow was significantly higher
with Retavase® than with Alteplase at 90 minutes after the initiation of
therapy. In both clinical trials the reocclusion rates were similar for Retavase®
and Alteplase. The relationship between coronary artery patency and clinical
efficacy has not been established.
Approximately 70% (RAPID 1) and 78% (RAPID 2) of the patients in the arteriographic
studies underwent optional arteriography at 60 minutes following the administration
of the study agents. In both trials the percentage of patients with complete
flow at 60 minutes was significantly higher with Retavase® than with Alteplase.
Neither RAPID clinical trial was designed nor powered to compare the efficacy
or safety of Retavase® and Alteplase with respect to the outcomes of mortality
and stroke.
Table 2: RAPID 1 and RAPID 2 TRIALS Arteriographic Results
| Outcome |
RAPID 2 |
RAPID 1* |
| Retavase® (10 +10 unit) |
Alteplase (Accelerated regimen) |
p |
Retavase® Alteplase (10 +10 unit) |
(Standard regimen) |
p |
| 90 minute patency rates |
n = 157 |
n = 146 |
n = 142 |
n = 145 |
| TIMI 2 or 3 |
83% |
73% |
0.03 |
85% |
77% |
0.08 |
| TIMI 3 |
60% |
45% |
0.01 |
63% |
49% |
0.02 |
| Follow-up patency rates |
n = 128 |
n = 113 |
|
n = 123 |
n = 123 |
|
| TIMI 2 or 3 |
89% |
90% |
0.76 |
95% |
88% |
0.040 |
| TIMI 3 |
75% |
77% |
0.72 |
88% |
71% |
0.001 |
| Follow-up ejection fraction |
n = 89 |
n = 77 |
|
n = 91 |
n = 84 |
|
| mean % |
52% |
54% |
0.25 |
53% |
49% |
0.03 |
| Follow-up regional wall motion |
n = 87 |
n = 72 |
|
n = 84 |
n = 80 |
|
| Standard deviation from mean normal value |
-2.3 |
-2.3 |
0.96 |
-2.2 |
-2.6 |
0.02 |
| *p values represent one of multiple dose
comparisons. |
References
1. Martin U, Sponer G, Strein K.Evaluation of thrombolytic and
systemic effects of the novel recombinant plasminogen activator BM 06.022 compared
with alteplase, anistreplase, streptokinase and urokinase in a canine model
of coronary artery thrombosis. JACC. 1992;19:433-440.
2. Kohnert U, Rudolph R, Verheijen JH. Biochemical properties of the kringle
2 and protease domains are maintained in the refolded t-PA deletion variant
BM 06.022. Protein Engineering. 1992;5:93-100.
3. Smalling R, Bode C, Kalbfleisch J, et al.More rapid,complete,and
stable coronary thrombolysis with bolus administration of reteplase compared
with alteplase infusion in acute myocardial infarction. Circulation.
1995;91:2725-2732.
4. Bode C, Smalling R, Gunther B, et al.Randomized comparison
of coronary thrombolysis achieved with double bolus reteplase (recombinant plasminogen
activator) and front-loaded, accelerated alteplase (recombinant tissue plasminogen
activator) in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Circulation.
1996;94:891-898.
5. INJECT Study Group. Randomised,double-blind comparison of reteplase double-bolus
administration with streptokinase in acute myocardial infarction (INJECT):trial
to investigate equivalence.Lancet. 1995; 346:329-336.
Last updated on RxList: 9/15/2008