Mechanism of Action
Atazanavir is an antiviral drug.
Pharmacodynamics
Effects on Electrocardiogram
Concentration- and dose-dependent prolongation of the PR interval in the electrocardiogram
has been observed in healthy volunteers receiving atazanavir.
In a placebo-controlled study (AI424-076), the mean (±SD) maximum change
in PR interval from the predose value was 24 (±15) msec following oral
dosing with 400 mg of atazanavir (n=65) compared to 13 (±11) msec following
dosing with placebo (n=67). The PR interval prolongations in this study were
asymptomatic. There is limited information on the potential for a pharmacodynamic
interaction in humans between atazanavir and other drugs that prolong the PR
interval of the electrocardiogram. [See WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS.]
Electrocardiographic effects of atazanavir were determined in a clinical pharmacology
study of 72 healthy subjects. Oral doses of 400 mg and 800 mg were compared
with placebo; there was no concentration-dependent effect of atazanavir on the
QTc interval (using Fridericia's correction). In 1793 HIV-infected patients
receiving antiretroviral regimens, QTc prolongation was comparable in the atazanavir
and comparator regimens. No atazanavir-treated healthy subject or HIV-infected
patient in clinical trials had a QTc interval > 500 msec. [See WARNINGS
AND PRECAUTIONS.]
In a pharmacokinetic study between atazanavir 400 mg once daily and diltiazem
180 mg once daily, a CYP3A substrate, there was a 2-fold increase in the diltiazem
plasma concentration and an additive effect on the PR interval. In a pharmacokinetic
study between atazanavir 400 mg once daily and atenolol 50 mg once daily, there
was no substantial additive effect of atazanavir and atenolol on the PR interval.
[See WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS.]
Pharmacokinetics
The pharmacokinetics of atazanavir were evaluated in healthy adult volunteers
and in HIV-infected patients after administration of REYATAZ 400 mg once daily
and after administration of REYATAZ 300 mg with ritonavir 100 mg once daily
(see Table 14).
Table 14: Steady-State Pharmacokinetics of Atazanavir in
Healthy Subjects or HIV-Infected Patients in the Fed State
| Parameter |
400 mg once daily |
300 mg with ritonavir
100 mg once daily |
Healthy
Subjects
(n=14) |
HIV-Infected
Patients
(n=13) |
Healthy
Subjects
(n=28) |
HIV-Infected
Patients
(n=10) |
| Cmax (ng/mL) |
| Geometric mean (CV%) |
5199 (26) |
2298 (71) |
6129 (31) |
4422 (58) |
| Mean (SD) |
5358 (1371) |
3152 (2231) |
6450 (2031) |
5233 (3033) |
| Tmax (h) |
| Median |
2.5 |
2.0 |
2.7 |
3.0 |
| AUC (ng•h/mL) |
| Geometric mean (CV%) |
28132 (28) |
14874 (91) |
57039 (37) |
46073 (66) |
| Mean (SD) |
29303 (8263) |
22262 (20159) |
61435 (22911) |
53761 (35294) |
| T-half (h) |
| Mean (SD) |
7.9 (2.9) |
6.5 (2.6) |
18.1 (6.2)a |
8.6 (2.3) |
| Cmin (ng/mL) |
| Geometric mean (CV%) |
159 (88) |
120 (109) |
1227 (53) |
636 (97) |
| Mean (SD) |
218 (191) |
273 (298)b |
1441 (757) |
862 (838) |
| a n=26. b n=12. |
Figure 1 displays the mean plasma concentrations of atazanavir at steady state
after REYATAZ 400 mg once daily (as two 200-mg capsules) with a light meal and
after REYATAZ 300 mg (as two 150-mg capsules) with ritonavir 100 mg once daily
with a light meal in HIV-infected adult patients.
Figure 1: Mean (SD) Steady-State Plasma Concentrations of
Atazanavir 400 mg (n=13) and 300 mg with Ritonavir (n=10) for HIV-Infected Adult
Patients
Absorption
Atazanavir is rapidly absorbed with a Tmax of approximately 2.5 hours. Atazanavir
demonstrates nonlinear pharmacokinetics with greater than dose-proportional
increases in AUC and Cmax values over the dose range of 200–800 mg once daily.
Steady-state is achieved between Days 4 and 8, with an accumulation of approximately
2.3-fold.
Food Effect
Administration of REYATAZ with food enhances bioavailability and reduces pharmacokinetic
variability. Administration of a single 400-mg dose of REYATAZ with a light
meal (357 kcal, 8.2 g fat, 10.6 g protein) resulted in a 70% increase in AUC
and 57% increase in Cmax relative to the fasting state. Administration of a
single 400-mg dose of REYATAZ with a high-fat meal (721 kcal, 37.3 g fat, 29.4
g protein) resulted in a mean increase in AUC of 35% with no change in Cmax
relative to the fasting state. Administration of REYATAZ (atazanavir sulfate)
with either a light meal or high-fat meal decreased the coefficient of variation
of AUC and Cmax by approximately one half compared to the fasting state.
Coadministration of a single 300-mg dose of REYATAZ and a 100-mg dose of ritonavir
with a light meal (336 kcal, 5.1 g fat, 9.3 g protein) resulted in a 33% increase
in the AUC and a 40% increase in both the Cmax and the 24-hour concentration
of atazanavir relative to the fasting state.
Coadministration with a high-fat meal (951 kcal, 54.7 g fat, 35.9 g protein)
did not affect the AUC of atazanavir relative to fasting conditions and the
Cmax was within 11% of fasting values. The 24-hour concentration following a
high-fat meal was increased by approximately 33% due to delayed absorption;
the median Tmax increased from 2.0 to 5.0 hours. Coadministration of REYATAZ
with ritonavir with either a light or a high-fat meal decreased the coefficient
of variation of AUC and Cmax by approximately 25% compared to the fasting state.
Distribution
Atazanavir is 86% bound to human serum proteins and protein binding is independent
of concentration. Atazanavir binds to both alpha-1-acid glycoprotein (AAG) and
albumin to a similar extent (89% and 86%, respectively). In a multiple-dose
study in HIV-infected patients dosed with REYATAZ 400 mg once daily with a light
meal for 12 weeks, atazanavir was detected in the cerebrospinal fluid and semen.
The cerebrospinal fluid/plasma ratio for atazanavir (n=4) ranged between 0.0021
and 0.0226 and seminal fluid/plasma ratio (n=5) ranged between 0.11 and 4.42.
Metabolism
Atazanavir is extensively metabolized in humans. The major biotransformation
pathways of atazanavir in humans consisted of monooxygenation and dioxygenation.
Other minor biotransformation pathways for atazanavir or its metabolites consisted
of glucuronidation, N-dealkylation, hydrolysis, and oxygenation with dehydrogenation.
Two minor metabolites of atazanavir in plasma have been characterized. Neither
metabolite demonstrated in vitro antiviral activity. In vitro studies
using human liver microsomes suggested that atazanavir is metabolized by CYP3A.
Elimination
Following a single 400-mg dose of 14C-atazanavir, 79% and 13% of the total
radioactivity was recovered in the feces and urine, respectively. Unchanged
drug accounted for approximately 20% and 7% of the administered dose in the
feces and urine, respectively. The mean elimination half-life of atazanavir
in healthy volunteers (n=214) and HIV-infected adult patients (n=13) was approximately
7 hours at steady state following a dose of 400 mg daily with a light meal.
Special Populations
Pediatrics
The pharmacokinetic data from pediatric patients receiving REYATAZ Capsules
with ritonavir based on body surface area are presented in Table 15.
Table 15: Steady-State Pharmacokinetics of Atazanavir with
ritonavir in HIV-Infected Pediatric Patients (6 to less than 18 years of age)
in the Fed State
| |
205 mg/m² atazanavir with 100 mg/m²
ritonavir once daily Age Range (years) |
| at least 6 to 13 (n=17) |
at least 13 to 18 (n=10) |
| Dose mg |
| Median |
200 |
400 |
| [min-max] |
[150–400] |
[250–500] |
| Cmax ng/mL |
| Geometric mean (CV%) |
4451 (33) |
3711 (46) |
| AUC ng•h/mL |
| Geometric mean (CV%) |
42503 (36) |
44970 (34) |
| Cmin ng/mL |
| Geometric mean (CV%) |
535 (62) |
1090 (60) |
Drug Interaction Data
Atazanavir is a metabolism-dependent CYP3A inhibitor, with a Kinact
value of 0.05 to 0.06 min-1 and Ki value of 0.84 to 1.0
μM. Atazanavir is also a direct inhibitor for UGT1A1 (Ki=1.9 μM)
and CYP2C8 (Ki=2.1 μM).
Atazanavir has been shown in vivo not to induce its own metabolism, nor to
increase the biotransformation of some drugs metabolized by CYP3A. In a multiple-dose
study, REYATAZ decreased the urinary ratio of endogenous 6ß-OH cortisol to cortisol
versus baseline, indicating that CYP3A production was not induced.
Drug interaction studies were performed with REYATAZ and other drugs likely
to be coadministered and some drugs commonly used as probes for pharmacokinetic
interactions. The effects of coadministration of REYATAZ on the AUC, Cmax, and
Cmin are summarized in Tables 16 and 17. For information regarding clinical
recommendations, see DRUG INTERACTIONS.
Table 16: DRUG INTERACTIONS: Pharmacokinetic Parameters for
Atazanavir in the Presence of Coadministered Drugsa
Coadministered
Drug |
Coadministered
Drug Dose/Schedule |
REYATAZ Dose/Schedule |
Ratio (90% Confidence Interval)
of Atazanavir Pharmacokinetic
Parameters with/without
Coadministered Drug;
No Effect= 1.00 |
| Cmax |
AUC |
Cmin |
| atenolol |
50 mg QD, d 7–11 (n=19) and d 19–23 |
400 mg QD, d 1–11 (n=19) |
1.00
(0.89, 1.12) |
0.93
(0.85, 1.01) |
0.74
(0.65, 0.86) |
| clarithromycin |
500 mg BID, d 7–10 (n=29) and d 18–21 |
400 mg QD, d 1–10 (n=29) |
1.06
(0.93, 1.20) |
1.28
(1.16, 1.43) |
1.91
(1.66, 2.21) |
| didanosine (ddI) (buffered tablets) plus stavudine
(d4T)b |
ddI: 200 mg x 1 dose, d4T: 40 mg x 1 dose (n=31) |
400 mg x 1 dose simultaneously with ddI and d4T (n=31) |
0.11
(0.06, 0.18) |
0.13
(0.08, 0.21) |
0.16
(0.10, 0.27) |
| ddI: 200 mg x 1 dose, d4T: 40 mg x 1 dose (n=32) |
400 mg x 1 dose1 h after ddI + d4T(n=32) |
1.12
(0.67, 1.18) |
1.03
(0.64, 1.67) |
1.03
(0.61, 1.73) |
| ddI (enteric-coated [EC] capsules)c |
400 mg d 8 (fed) (n=34) |
400 mg QD, d 2–8 (n=34) |
1.03
(0.93, 1.14) |
0.99
(0.91, 1.08) |
0.98
(0.89, 1.08) |
| 400 mg d 19 (fed) (n=31) 100 mg |
300 mg/ritonavir QD, d 9–19 (n=31) |
1.04
(1.01, 1.07) |
1.00
(0.96, 1.03) |
0.87
(0.82, 0.92) |
| diltiazem |
180 mg QD, d 7–11 (n=30) and d 19–23 |
400 mg QD, d 1–11 (n=30) |
1.04
(0.96, 1.11) |
1.00
(0.95, 1.05) |
0.98
(0.90, 1.07) |
| efavirenz |
600 mg QD, d 7–20 (n=27) |
400 mg QD, d 1–20 (n=27) |
0.41
(0.33, 0.51) |
0.26
(0.22, 0.32) |
0.07
(0.05, 0.10) |
| 600 mg QD, d 7–20 (n=13) |
400 mg QD, d 1–6 (n=23) then 300 mg/ritonavir 100 mg
QD, 2 h before efavirenz,d 7–20 (n=13) |
1.14
(0.83, 1.58) |
1.39
(1.02, 1.88) |
1.48
(1.24, 1.76) |
| |
600 mg QD,d 11–24 (pm) (n=14) |
300 mg QD/ritonavir 100 mg QD, d 1–10 (pm) (n=22), then
400 mg QD/ritonavir 100 mg QD, d 11–24 (pm), (simultaneous with efavirenz)
(n=14) |
1.17
(1.08, 1.27) |
1.00
(0.91, 1.10) |
0.58
(0.49, 0.69) |
| famotidine |
40 mg BID, d 7–12 (n=15) |
400 mg QD, d 1–6 (n=45), d 7–12 (simultaneous administration)
(n=15) |
0.53
(0.34, 0.82) |
0.59
(0.40, 0.87) |
0.58
(0.37, 0.89) |
| 40 mg BID, d 7–12 (n=14) |
400 mg QD (pm), d 1–6 (n=14), d 7–12 (10 h after, 2 h
before famotidine) (n=14) |
1.08
(0.82, 1.41) |
0.95
(0.74, 1.21) |
0.79
(0.60, 1.04) |
| 40 mg BID, d 11–20 (n=14)d |
300 mg QD/ritonavir 100 mg QD, d 1–10 (n=46), d 11–20d
(simultaneous administration) (n=14) |
0.86
(0.79, 0.94) |
0.82
(0.75, 0.89) |
0.72
(0.64, 0.81) |
| 20 mg BID, d 11–17 (n=18) |
300 mg QD/ritonavir 100 mg QD/tenofovir 300 mg QD, d
1–10 (am) (n=39), d 11–17 (am) (simultaneous administration with am famotidine)
(n=18)e,f |
0.91
(0.84, 0.99) |
0.90
(0.82, 0.98) |
0.81
(0.69, 0.94) |
| 40 mg QD (pm), d 18–24 (n=20) (12 h after |
300 mg QD/ritonavir 100 mg QD/tenofovir 300 mg QD, d
1–10 (am) (n=39), d 18–24 (am)pm famotidine) (n=20)f |
0.89
(0.81, 0.97) |
0.88
(0.80, 0.96) |
0.77
(0.63, 0.93) |
| 40 mg BID, d 18–24 (n=18) |
300 mg QD/ritonavir 100 mg QD/tenofovir 300 mg QD, d
1–10 (am) (n=39), d 18–24 (am) (10 h after pm famotidine and 2 h before
am famotidine) (n=18)f |
0.74
(0.66, 0.84) |
0.79
(0.70, 0.88) |
0.72
(0.63, 0.83) |
| 40 mg BID, d 11–20 (n=15) 100 mg QD, |
300 mg QD/ritonavir 100 mg QD, d 1–10 (am) (n=46), then
400 mg QD/ritonavir d 11–20 (am) (n=15) |
1.02
(0.87, 1.18) |
1.03
(0.86, 1.22) |
0.86
(0.68, 1.08) |
| fluconazole |
200 mg QD, d 11–20 (n=29) |
300 mg QD/ritonavir 100 mg QD, d 1–10 (n=19), d 11–20
(n=29) |
1.03
(0.95, 1.11) |
1.04
(0.95, 1.13) |
0.98
(0.85, 1.13) |
| ketoconazole |
200 mg QD, d 7–13 (n=14) |
400 mg QD, d 1–13 (n=14) |
0.99
(0.77, 1.28) |
1.10
(0.89, 1.37) |
1.03
(0.53, 2.01) |
| nevirapineg,h |
200 mg BID, d 1–23 (n=23) |
300 mg QD/ritonavir 100 mg QD, d 4–13, then
400 mg QD/ritonavir 100 mg QD, d 14–23 (n=23)i |
0.72
(0.60, 0.86) |
0.58
(0.48, 0.71) |
0.28
(0.20, 0.40) |
1.02
(0.85, 1.24) |
0.81
(0.65, 1.02) |
0.41
(0.27, 0.60) |
| omeprazole |
40 mg QD, d 7–12 (n=16)j |
400 mg QD, d 1–6 (n=48), d 7–12 (n=16) |
0.04
(0.04, 0.05) |
0.06
(0.05, 0.07) |
0.05
(0.03, 0.07) |
| 40 mg QD, d 11–20 (n=15)j |
300 mg QD/ritonavir 100 mg QD, d 1–20 (n=15) |
0.28
(0.24, 0.32) |
0.24
(0.21, 0.27) |
0.22
(0.19, 0.26) |
| 20 mg QD, d 17–23 (am) (n=13) |
300 mg QD/ritonavir 100 mg QD, d 7–16 (pm) (n=27), d
17–23 (pm) (n=13) k,l |
0.61
(0.46, 0.81) |
0.58
(0.44, 0.75) |
0.54
(0.41, 0.71) |
| 20 mg QD, d 17–23 (am) (n=14) |
300 mg QD/ritonavir 100 mg QD, d 7–16 (am) (n=27), then
400 mg QD/ritonavir 100 mg QD, d 17–23 (am) (n=14)m,n |
0.69
(0.58, 0.83) |
0.70
(0.57, 0.86) |
0.69
(0.54, 0.88) |
| rifabutin |
150 mg QD, d 15–28 (n=7) |
400 mg QD, d 1–28 (n=7) |
1.34
(1.14, 1.59) |
1.15
(0.98, 1.34) |
1.13
(0.68, 1.87) |
| rifampin |
600 mg QD, d 17–26 (n=16) |
300 mg QD/ritonavir 100 mg QD, d 7–16 (n=48), d 17–26
(n=16) |
0.47
(0.41, 0.53) |
0.28
(0.25, 0.32) |
0.02
(0.02, 0.03) |
| ritonaviro |
100 mg QD, d 11–20 (n=28) |
300 mg QD, d 1–20 (n=28) |
1.86
(1.69, 2.05) |
3.38
(3.13, 3.63) |
11.89
(10.23, 13.82) |
| tenofovirp |
300 mg QD, d 9–16 (n=34) |
400 mg QD, d 2–16 (n=34) |
0.79
(0.73, 0.86) |
0.75
(0.70, 0.81) |
0.60
(0.52, 0.68) |
| 300 mg QD, d 15–42 (n=10) |
300 mg/ritonavir 100 mg QD, d 1–42 (n=10) |
0.72q
(0.50, 1.05) |
0.75q
(0.58, 0.97) |
0.77q
(0.54, 1.10) |
a Data provided are under fed
conditions unless otherwise noted.
b All drugs were given under fasted conditions.
c 400 mg ddI EC and REYATAZ were administered together with
food on Days 8 and 19.
d REYATAZ 300 mg plus ritonavir 100 mg once daily coadministered
with famotidine 40 mg twice daily resulted in atazanavir geometric mean
Cmax that was similar and AUC and Cmin values that were 1.79- and 4.46-fold
higher relative to REYATAZ 400 mg once daily alone.
e Similar results were noted when famotidine 20 mg BID was
administered 2 hours after and 10 hours before atazanavir 300 mg and ritonavir
100 mg plus tenofovir 300 mg.
f Atazanavir/ritonavir/tenofovir was administered after a light
meal.
g Study was conducted in HIV-infected individuals.
h Compared with atazanavir 400 mg historical data without nevirapine
(n=13), the ratio of geometric means (90% confidence intervals) for Cmax,
AUC, and Cmin were 1.42 (0.98, 2.05), 1.64 (1.11, 2.42), and 1.25 (0.66,
2.36), respectively, for atazanavir/ ritonavir 300/100 mg; and 2.02 (1.42,
2.87), 2.28 (1.54, 3.38), and 1.80 (0.94, 3.45), respectively, for atazanavir/ritonavir
400/100 mg.
i Parallel group design; n=23 for atazanavir/ritonavir plus
nevirapine, n=22 for atazanavir 300 mg/ritonavir 100 mg without nevirapine.
Subjects were treated with nevirapine prior to study entry.
j Omeprazole 40 mg was administered on an empty stomach 2 hours
before REYATAZ.
k Omeprazole 20 mg was administered 30 minutes prior to a light
meal in the morning and REYATAZ 300 mg plus ritonavir 100 mg in the evening
after a light meal, separated by 12 hours from omeprazole.
l REYATAZ 300 mg plus ritonavir 100 mg once daily separated
by 12 hours from omeprazole 20 mg daily resulted in increases in atazanavir
geometric mean AUC (10%) and Cmin (2.4-fold), with a decrease in Cmax
(29%) relative to REYATAZ 400 mg once daily in the absence of omeprazole
(study days 1–6).
m Omeprazole 20 mg was given 30 minutes prior to a light meal
in the morning and REYATAZ 400 mg plus ritonavir 100 mg once daily after
a light meal, 1 hour after omeprazole. Effects on atazanavir concentrations
were similar when REYATAZ 400 mg plus ritonavir 100 mg was separated from
omeprazole 20 mg by 12 hours.
n REYATAZ 400 mg plus ritonavir 100 mg once daily administered
with omeprazole 20 mg once daily resulted in increases in atazanavir geometric
mean AUC (32%) and Cmin (3.3-fold), with a decrease in Cmax (26%) relative
to REYATAZ 400 mg once daily in the absence of omeprazole (study days
1–6).
o Compared with atazanavir 400 mg QD historical data, administration
of atazanavir/ritonavir 300/100 mg QD increased the atazanavir geometric
mean values of Cmax, AUC, and Cmin by 18%, 103%, and 671%, respectively.
p Note that similar results were observed in studies where
administration of tenofovir and REYATAZ was separated by 12 hours.
q Ratio of atazanavir plus ritonavir plus tenofovir to atazanavir
plus ritonavir. Atazanavir 300 mg plus ritonavir 100 mg results in higher
atazanavir exposure than atazanavir 400 mg (see footnote o). The geometric
mean values of atazanavir pharmacokinetic parameters when coadministered
with ritonavir and tenofovir were: Cmax = 3190 ng/mL, AUC = 34459 ng•h/mL,
and Cmin = 491 ng/mL. Study was conducted in HIV-infected individuals. |
Table 17: Drug Interactions: Pharmacokinetic Parameters for
Coadministered Drugs in the Presence of REYATAZa
| Coadministered Drug |
Coadministered
Drug Dose/Schedule |
REYATAZ Dose/Schedule |
Ratio (90% Confidence Interval) of
Coadministered Drug Pharmacokinetic
Parameters with/without REYATAZ;
No Effect = 1.00 |
| Cmax |
AUC |
Cmin |
| acetaminophen |
1 gm BID,d 1–20 (n=10) |
300 mg QD/ritonavir 100 mg QD, d 11–20 (n=10) |
0.87
(0.77, 0.99) |
0.97
(0.91, 1.03) |
1.26
(1.08, 1.46) |
| atenolol |
50 mg QD,d 7–11 (n=19) and d 19–23 |
400 mg QD, d 1–11 (n=19) |
1.34
(1.26, 1.42) |
1.25
(1.16, 1.34) |
1.02
(0.88, 1.19) |
| clarithromycin |
500 mg BID, d 7–10 (n=21) and d 18–21 |
400 mg QD, d 1–10 (n=21) |
1.50
(1.32, 1.71) |
1.94
(1.75, 2.16) |
2.60
(2.35, 2.88) |
| OH- clarithromycin: |
OH- clarithromycin: |
OH- clarithromycin: |
0.28
(0.24, 0.33) |
0.30
(0.26, 0.34) |
0.38
(0.34, 0.42) |
| didanosine (ddI) (buffered tablets) plus stavudine
(d4T)b |
ddI: 200 mg x 1 dose,
d4T: 40 mg x 1 dose (n=31) |
400 mg x 1 dose simultaneous with ddI and
d4T (n=31) |
ddI:
(0.84, 1.02) |
0.92 ddI:
(0.92, 1.05) |
0.98 NA |
d4T: 1.08
(0.96, 1.22) |
d4T: 1.00
(0.97, 1.03) |
d4T: 1.04
(0.94, 1.16) |
| ddI (enteric-coated [EC] capsules)c |
400 mg d 1 (fasted), d 8 (fed) (n=34) |
400 mg QD, d 2–8 (n=34) |
0.64
(0.55, 0.74) |
0.66
(0.60, 0.74) |
1.13
(0.91, 1.41) |
| 400 mg d 1 (fasted), d 19 (fed) (n=31) |
300 mg QD/ritonavir 100 mg QD, d 9–19 (n=31) |
0.62
(0.52, 0.74) |
0.66
(0.59, 0.73) |
1.25
(0.92, 1.69) |
| diltiazem |
180 mg QD, d 7–11 (n=28) and d 19–23 |
400 mg QD, d 1–11 (n=28) |
1.98
(1.78, 2.19) |
2.25
(2.09, 2.16) |
2.42
(2.14, 2.73) |
| desacetyl-diltiazem: |
desacetyl-diltiazem: |
desacetyl-diltiazem |
2.72
(2.44, 3.03) |
2.65
(2.45, 2.87) |
2.21
(2.02, 2.42) |
| ethinyl estradiol & norethindroned |
Ortho-Novum®7/7/7 QD, d 1–29 (n=19) |
400 mg QD, d 16–29 (n=19) |
ethinyl estradiol: |
ethinyl estradiol: |
ethinyl estradiol: |
1.15
(0.99, 1.32) |
1.48
(1.31, 1.68) |
1.91
(1.57, 2.33) |
| norethindrone: |
norethindrone: |
norethindrone: |
1.67
(1.42, 1.96) |
2.10
(1.68, 2.62) |
3.62
(2.57, 5.09) |
| ethinyl estradio l& norgestimatee |
Ortho Tri-Cyclen®QD, d 1–28 (n=18), then
Ortho Tri-Cyclen® LOQD, d 29–42f (n=14) |
300 mg QD/ritonavir 100 mg QD,d 29–42 (n=14) |
ethinyl estradiol: |
ethinyl |
estradiol: |
0.84
(0.74, 0.95) |
0.81
(0.75, 0.87) |
0.63
(0.55, 0.71) |
| 17-deacetyl norgestimate: g |
17-deacetyl norgestimate: g |
17-deacetyl norgestimate: g |
1.68
(1.51, 1.88) |
1.85
(1.67, 2.05) |
2.02
(1.77, 2.31) |
| fluconazole |
200 mg QD, d 1–10 (n=11) and 200 mg QD, d 11–20 (n=29) |
300 mg QD/ritonavir 100 mg QD, d 11–20 (n=29) |
1.05
(0.99, 1.10) |
1.08
(1.02, 1.15) |
1.07
(1.00, 1.15) |
| methadone |
Stable maintenance dose, d 1–15 (n=16) |
400 mg QD, d 2–15 (n=16) |
(R)-methadoneh |
(R)-methadoneh |
(R)-methadoneh |
0.91
(0.84, 1.0) |
1.03
(0.95, 1.10) |
1.11
(1.02, 1.20) |
total: 0.85
(0.78, 0.93) |
total: 0.94
(0.87, 1.02) |
total: 1.02
(0.93, 1.12) |
| nevirapinei,j |
200 mg BID,d 1–23 (n=23) |
300 mg QD/ritonavir 100 mg QD, d 4–13, then |
1.17
(1.09, 1.25) |
1.25
(1.17, 1.34) |
1.32
(1.22, 1.43) |
| 400 mg QD/ritonavir 100 mg QD, d 14–23 (n=23) |
1.21(1.11, 1.32) |
1.26
(1.17, 1.36) |
1.35
(1.25, 1.47) |
| omeprazolek |
40 mg single dose, d 7 and d 20 (n=16) |
400 mg QD, d 1–12 (n=16) |
1.24
(1.04, 1.47) |
1.45
(1.20, 1.76) |
NA |
| rifabutin |
300 mg QD, d 1–10 then 150 mg QD, d 11–20
(n=3) |
600 mg QD,l d 11–20 (n=3) |
1.18(0.94, 1.48) |
2.10(1.57, 2.79) |
3.43(1.98, 5.96) |
25-O-desacetyl-rifabutin:
8.20
(5.90, 11.40) |
25-O-desacetyl-rifabutin:
22.01
(15.97, 30.34) |
25-O-desacetyl-rifabutin:
75.6
(30.1, 190.0) |
| rosiglitazonem |
4 mg single dose, d 1, 7, 17 (n=14) |
400 mg QD, d 2–7, then 300 mg QD/ritonavir
100 mg QD, d 8–17 (n=14) |
1.08
(1.03, 1.13) |
1.35
(1.26, 1.44) |
NA |
0.97
(0.91, 1.04) |
0.83
(0.77, 0.89) |
NA |
| saquinavirn (soft gelatin capsules) |
1200 mg QD,d 1–13 (n=7) |
400 mg QD,d 7–13 (n=7) |
4.39
(3.24, 5.95) |
5.49
(4.04, 7.47) |
6.86
(5.29, 8.91) |
| tenofoviro |
300 mg QD, d 9–16 (n=33) and d 24–30 (n=33) |
400 mg QD, d 2–16 (n=33) |
1.14
(1.08, 1.20) |
1.24
(1.21, 1.28) |
1.22
(1.15, 1.30) |
| 300 mg QD, d 1–7 (pm) (n=14) ritonavir d 25–34 (pm) (n=12) |
300 mg QD/100 mg QD,d 25–34 (am) (n=12)p |
1.34
(1.20, 1.51) |
1.37
(1.30, 1.45) |
1.29
(1.21, 1.36) |
| lamivudine + zidovudine |
150 mg lamivudine + 300 mg zidovudine BID,
d 1–12 (n=19) |
400 mg QD,d 7–12 (n=19) |
lamivudine: |
lamivudine: |
lamivudine: |
1.04
(0.92, 1.16) |
1.03
(0.98, 1.08) |
1.12
(1.04, 1.21) |
| zidovudine: |
zidovudine: |
zidovudine: |
1.05
(0.88, 1.24) |
1.05
(0.96, 1.14) |
0.69
(0.57, 0.84) |
| zidovudine glucuronide: |
zidovudine glucuronide: |
zidovudine glucuronide: |
0.95
(0.88, 1.02) |
1.00
(0.97, 1.03) |
0.82
(0.62, 1.08) |
a Data provided are under fed
conditions unless otherwise noted.
b All drugs were given under fasted conditions.
c 400 mg ddI EC and REYATAZ were administered together with
food on Days 8 and 19.
d Upon further dose normalization of ethinyl estradiol 25 mcg
with atazanavir relative to ethinyl estradiol 35 mcg without atazanavir,
the ratio of geometric means (90% confidence intervals) for Cmax, AUC,
and Cmin were 0.82 (0.73, 0.92), 1.06 (0.95, 1.17), and 1.35 (1.11, 1.63),
respectively.
e Upon further dose normalization of ethinyl estradiol 35 mcg
with atazanavir/ritonavir relative to ethinyl estradiol 25 mcg without
atazanavir/ritonavir, the ratio of geometric means (90% confidence intervals)
for Cmax, AUC, and Cmin were 1.17 (1.03, 1.34), 1.13 (1.05, 1.22), and
0.88 (0.77, 1.00), respectively.
f All subjects were on a 28 day lead-in period; one full cycle
of Ortho Tri-Cyclen®. Ortho Tri-Cyclen® contains 35 mcg of ethinyl
estradiol. Ortho Tri-Cyclen® LO contains 25 mcg of ethinyl estradiol.
Results were dose normalized to an ethinyl estradiol dose of 35 mcg.
g 17-deacetyl norgestimate is the active component of norgestimate.
h (R)-methadone is the active isomer of methadone.
i Study was conducted in HIV-infected individuals.
j Subjects were treated with nevirapine prior to study entry.
k Omeprazole was used as a metabolic probe for CYP2C19. Omeprazole
was given 2 hours after REYATAZ on Day 7; and was given alone 2 hours
after a light meal on Day 20.
l Not the recommended therapeutic dose of atazanavir.
m Rosiglitazone used as a probe substrate for CYP2C8.
n The combination of atazanavir and saquinavir 1200 mg QD produced
daily saquinavir exposures similar to the values produced by the standard
therapeutic dosing of saquinavir at 1200 mg TID. However, the Cmax is
about 79% higher than that for the standard dosing of saquinavir (soft
gelatin capsules) alone at 1200 mg TID.
o Note that similar results were observed in a study where
administration of tenofovir and REYATAZ was separated by 12 hours.
p Administration of tenofovir and REYATAZ was temporally separated
by 12 hours.
NA = not available. |
Microbiology
Mechanism of Action
Atazanavir (ATV) is an azapeptide HIV-1 protease inhibitor (PI). The compound
selectively inhibits the virus-specific processing of viral Gag and Gag-Pol
polyproteins in HIV-1 infected cells, thus preventing formation of mature virions.
Antiviral Activity in Cell Culture
Atazanavir exhibits anti-HIV-1 activity with a mean 50% effective concentration
(EC50) in the absence of human serum of 2 to 5 nM against a variety
of laboratory and clinical HIV-1 isolates grown in peripheral blood mononuclear
cells, macrophages, CEM-SS cells, and MT-2 cells. ATV has activity against HIV-1
Group M subtype viruses A, B, C, D, AE, AG, F, G, and J isolates in cell culture.
ATV has variable activity against HIV-2 isolates (1.9 to 32 nM), with EC50 values
above the EC50 values of failure isolates. Two-drug combination antiviral activity
studies with ATV showed no antagonism in cell culture with NNRTIs (delavirdine,
efavirenz, and nevirapine), PIs (amprenavir, indinavir, lopinavir, nelfinavir,
ritonavir, and saquinavir), NRTIs (abacavir, didanosine, emtricitabine, lamivudine,
stavudine, tenofovir, zalcitabine, and zidovudine), the HIV-1 fusion inhibitor
enfuvirtide, and two compounds used in the treatment of viral hepatitis, adefovir
and ribavirin, without enhanced cytotoxicity.
Resistance
In Cell Culture: HIV-1 isolates with a decreased susceptibility to ATV
have been selected in cell culture and obtained from patients treated with ATV
or atazanavir/ ritonavir (ATV/RTV). HIV-1 isolates with 93- to 183-fold reduced
susceptibility to ATV from three different viral strains were selected in cell
culture by 5 months. The substitutions in these HIV-1 viruses that contributed
to ATV resistance include I50L, N88S, I84V, A71V, and M46I. Changes were also
observed at the protease cleavage sites following drug selection. Recombinant
viruses containing the I50L substitution without other major PI substitutions
were growth impaired and displayed increased susceptibility in cell culture
to other PIs (amprenavir, indinavir, lopinavir, nelfinavir, ritonavir, and saquinavir).
The I50L and I50V substitutions yielded selective resistance to ATV and amprenavir,
respectively, and did not appear to be cross-resistant.
Clinical Studies of Treatment-Naive Patients: Comparison of Ritonavir-Boosted
REYATAZ vs. Unboosted REYATAZ: Study AI424-089 compared REYATAZ 300 mg once
daily with ritonavir 100 mg vs. REYATAZ 400 mg once daily when administered
with lamivudine and extended-release stavudine in HIV-infected treatment-naive
patients. A summary of the number of virologic failures and virologic failure
isolates with ATV resistance in each arm is shown in Table 18.
Table 18: Summary of Virologic Failuresa at Week
96 in Study AI424-089: Comparison of Ritonavir Boosted REYATAZ vs. Unboosted
REYATAZ: Randomized Patients
| |
REYATAZ 300 mg + ritonavir 100 mg (n=95) |
REYATAZ 400 mg
(n=105) |
| Virologic Failure ( ≥ 50 copies/mL) at Week 96 |
15 (16%) |
34 (32%) |
| Virologic Failure with Genotypes and Phenotypes Data |
5 |
17 |
| Virologic Failure Isolates with ATV-resistance at Week 96 |
0/5 (0%)b |
4/17 (24%)b |
| Virologic Failure Isolates with I50L Emergence at Week 96c |
0/5 (0%)b |
2/17 (12%)b |
| Virologic Failure Isolates with Lamivudine Resistance at Week 96 |
2/5 (40%)b |
11/17 (65%)b |
a Virologic failure includes patients who were
never suppressed through Week 96 and on study at Week 96, had virologic
rebound or discontinued due to insufficient viral load response.
b Percentage of Virologic Failure Isolates with genotypic and
phenotypic data.
c Mixture of I50I/L emerged in 2 other ATV 400 mg-treated patients.
Neither isolate was phenotypically resistant to ATV. |
Clinical Studies of Treatment-Naive Patients Receiving REYATAZ 300 mg With
Ritonavir 100 mg: In Phase III study AI424-138, an as-treated genotypic
and phenotypic analysis was conducted on samples from patients who experienced
virologic failure (HIV-1 RNA ≥ 400 copies/mL) or discontinued before achieving
suppression on ATV/RTV (n=39; 9%) and LPV/RTV (n=39; 9%) through 96 weeks of
treatment. In the ATV/RTV arm, one of the virologic failure isolates had a 56-fold
decrease in ATV susceptibility emerge on therapy with the development of PI
resistance-associated substitutions L10F, V32I, K43T, M46I, A71I, G73S, I85I/V,
and L90M. The NRTI resistance-associated substitution M184V also emerged on
treatment in this isolate conferring emtricitabine resistance. Two ATV/RTV-virologic
failure isolates had baseline phenotypic ATV resistance and IAS-defined major
PI resistance-associated substitutions at baseline. The I50L substitution emerged
on study in one of these failure isolates and was associated with a 17-fold
decrease in ATV susceptibility from baseline and the other failure isolate with
baseline ATV resistance and PI substitutions (M46M/I and I84I/V) had additional
IAS-defined major PI substitutions (V32I, M46I, and I84V) emerge on ATV treatment
associated with a 3-fold decrease in ATV susceptibility from baseline. Five
of the treatment failure isolates in the ATV/RTV arm developed phenotypic emtricitabine
resistance with the emergence of either the M184I (n=1) or the M184V (n=4) substitution
on therapy and none developed phenotypic tenofovir disoproxil resistance. In
the LPV/RTV arm, one of the virologic failure patient isolates had a 69-fold
decrease in LPV susceptibility emerge on therapy with the development of PI
substitutions L10V, V11I, I54V, G73S, and V82A in addition to baseline PI substitutions
L10L/I, V32I, I54I/V, A71I, G73G/S, V82V/A, L89V, and L90M. Six LPV/RTV virologic
failure isolates developed the M184V substitution and phenotypic emtricitabine
resistance and two developed phenotypic tenofovir disoproxil resistance.
Clinical Studies of Treatment-Naive Patients Receiving REYATAZ 400 mg Without
Ritonavir: ATV-resistant clinical isolates from treatment-naive patients
who experienced virologic failure on REYATAZ 400 mg treatment without ritonavir
often developed an I50L substitution (after an average of 50 weeks of ATV therapy),
often in combination with an A71V substitution, but also developed one or more
other PI substitutions (eg, V32I, L33F, G73S, V82A, I85V, or N88S) with or without
the I50L substitution. In treatment-naive patients, viral isolates that developed
the I50L substitution, without other major PI substitutions, showed phenotypic
resistance to ATV but retained in cell culture susceptibility to other PIs (amprenavir,
indinavir, lopinavir, nelfinavir, ritonavir, and saquinavir); however, there
are no clinical data available to demonstrate the effect of the I50L substitution
on the efficacy of subsequently administered PIs. Clinical Studies of Treatment-Experienced
Patients: In studies of treatmentexperienced patients treated with ATV or ATV/RTV,
most ATV-resistant isolates from patients who experienced virologic failure
developed substitutions that were associated with resistance to multiple PIs
and displayed decreased susceptibility to multiple PIs. The most common protease
substitutions to develop in the viral isolates of patients who failed treatment
with ATV 300 mg once daily and RTV 100 mg once daily (together with tenofovir
and an NRTI) included V32I, L33F/V/I, E35D/G, M46I/L, I50L, F53L/V, I54V, A71V/T/I,
G73S/T/C, V82A/T/L, I85V, and L89V/Q/M/T. Other substitutions that developed
on ATV/RTV treatment including E34K/A/Q, G48V, I84V, N88S/D/T, and L90M occurred
in less than 10% of patient isolates. Generally, if multiple PI resistance substitutions
were present in the HIV-1 virus of the patient at baseline, ATV resistance developed
through substitutions associated with resistance to other PIs and could include
the development of the I50L substitution. The I50L substitution has been detected
in treatment-experienced patients experiencing virologic failure after long-term
treatment. Protease cleavage site changes also emerged on ATV treatment but
their presence did not correlate with the level of ATV resistance.
Cross-Resistance
Cross-resistance among PIs has been observed. Baseline phenotypic and genotypic
analyses of clinical isolates from ATV clinical trials of PI-experienced patients
showed that isolates cross-resistant to multiple PIs were cross-resistant to
ATV. Greater than 90% of the isolates with substitutions that included I84V
or G48V were resistant to ATV. Greater than 60% of isolates containing L90M,
G73S/T/C, A71V/T, I54V, M46I/L, or a change at V82 were resistant to ATV, and
38% of isolates containing a D30N substitution in addition to other changes
were resistant to ATV. Isolates resistant to ATV were also cross-resistant to
other PIs with > 90% of the isolates resistant to indinavir, lopinavir, nelfinavir,
ritonavir, and saquinavir, and 80% resistant to amprenavir. In treatment-experienced
patients, PI-resistant viral isolates that developed the I50L substitution in
addition to other PI resistance-associated substitution were also cross-resistant
to other PIs.
Baseline Genotype/Phenotype and Virologic Outcome Analyses
Genotypic and/or phenotypic analysis of baseline virus may aid in determining
ATV susceptibility before initiation of ATV/RTV therapy. An association between
virologic response at 48 weeks and the number and type of primary PI resistance-associated
substitutions detected in baseline HIV-1 isolates from antiretroviral-experienced
patients receiving ATV/RTV once daily or lopinavir (LPV)/RTV twice daily in
Study AI424-045 is shown in Table 19.
Overall, both the number and type of baseline PI substitutions affected response
rates in treatment-experienced patients. In the ATV/RTV group, patients had
lower response rates when 3 or more baseline PI substitutions, including a substitution
at position 36, 71, 77, 82, or 90, were present compared to patients with 1–2
PI substitutions, including one of these substitutions.
Table 19: HIV RNA Response by Number and Type of Baseline
PI Substitution, Antiretroviral-Experienced Patients in Study AI424-045, As-Treated
Analysis
Number and Type of
Baseline PI Substitutionsa |
Virologic Response =HIV RNA < 400 copies/mLb |
ATV/RTV
(n=110) |
LPV/RTV
(n=113) |
| 3 or more primary PI substitutions including:c |
| D30N |
75% (6/8) |
50% (3/6) |
| M36I/V |
19% (3/16) |
33% (6/18) |
| M46I/L/T |
24% (4/17) |
23% (5/22) |
| I54V/L/T/M/A |
31% (5/16) |
31% (5/16) |
| A71V/T/I/G |
34% (10/29) |
39% (12/31) |
| G73S/A/C/T |
14% (1/7) |
38% (3/8) |
| V77I |
47% (7/15) |
44% (7/16) |
| V82A/F/T/S/I |
29% (6/21) |
27% (7/26) |
| I84V/A |
11% (1/9) |
33% (2/6) |
| N88D |
63% (5/8) |
67% (4/6) |
| L90M |
10% (2/21) |
44% (11/25) |
| Number of baseline primary PI substitutionsa |
| All patients, as-treated |
58% (64/110) |
59% (67/113) |
| 0–2 PI substitutions |
75% (50/67) |
75% (50/67) |
| 3–4 PI substitutions |
41% (14/34) |
43% (12/28) |
| 5 or more PI substitutions |
0% (0/9) |
28% (5/18) |
a Primary substitutions include any change at
D30, V32, M36, M46, I47, G48, I50, I54, A71, G73, V77, V82, I84, N88,
and L90.
b Results should be interpreted with caution because the subgroups
were small.
c There were insufficient data (n < 3) for PI substitutions
V32I, I47V, G48V, I50V, and F53L. |
The response rates of antiretroviral-experienced patients in Study AI424-045
were analyzed by baseline phenotype (shift in susceptibility in cell culture
relative to reference, Table 20). The analyses are based on a select patient
population with 62% of patients receiving an NNRTI-based regimen before study
entry compared to 35% receiving a PI-based regimen. Additional data are needed
to determine clinically relevant break points for REYATAZ.
Table 20: Baseline Phenotype by Outcome, Antiretroviral-Experienced
Patients in Study AI424-045, As-Treated Analysis
| Baseline Phenotypea |
Virologic Response =HIV RNA < 400 copies/mLb |
ATV/RTV
(n=111) |
LPV/RTV
(n=111) |
| 0–2 |
71% (55/78) |
70% (56/80) |
| > 2–5 |
53% (8/15) |
44% (4/9) |
| > 5–10 |
13% (1/8) |
33% (3/9) |
| > 10 |
10% (1/10) |
23% (3/13) |
a Fold change susceptibility in cell culture
relative to the wild-type reference.
b Results should be interpreted with caution because the subgroups
were small. |
Reproductive Toxicology Studies
At the systemic drug exposure levels (AUC) equal to (in male rats) or two times
(in female rats) those at the human clinical dose (400 mg once daily), atazanavir
did not produce significant effects on mating, fertility, or early embryonic
development.
Clinical Studies
Adult Patients Without Prior Antiretroviral Therapy
Study AI424-138: a 96-week study comparing the antiviral efficacy and
safety of atazanavir/ritonavir with lopinavir/ritonavir, each in combination
with fixed-dose tenofovir-emtricitabine in HIV-1 infected treatment naive subjects.
Study AI424-138 is a 96-week open-label, randomized, multicenter study, comparing
REYATAZ (300 mg once daily) with ritonavir (100 mg once daily) to lopinavir
with ritonavir (400/100 mg twice daily), each in combination with fixed-dose
tenofovir with emtricitabine (300/200 mg once daily), in 878 antiretroviral
treatment-naïve treated patients. Patients had a mean age of 36 years (range:
19–72), 49% were Caucasian, 18% Black, 9% Asian, 23% Hispanic/Mestizo/mixed
race, and 68% were male. The median baseline plasma CD4+ cell count was 204
cells/mm³ (range: 2 to 810 cells/mm³) and the mean baseline plasma
HIV-1 RNA level was 4.94 log10 copies/mL (range: 2.60 to 5.88 log10
copies/mL). Treatment response and outcomes through Week 96 are presented in
Table 21.
Table 21: Outcomes of Treatment Through Week 96 (Study AI424-138)
| Outcome |
REYATAZ
300 mg + ritonavir 100 mg (once daily)
with tenofovir/ emtricitabine
(once daily)a
(n=441)
96 Weeks |
lopinavir
400 mg + ritonavir 100 mg (twice daily)
with tenofovir/ emtricitabine
(once daily)a
(n=437)
96 Weeks |
| Responderb,c,d |
75% |
68% |
| Virologic failuree |
17% |
19% |
| Rebound |
8% |
10% |
| Never suppressed through Week 96 |
9% |
9% |
| Death |
1% |
1% |
| Discontinued due to adverse event |
3% |
5% |
| Discontinued for other reasonsf |
4% |
7% |
a As a fixed-dose combination: 300 mg tenofovir,
200 mg emtricitabine once daily.
b Patients achieved HIV RNA < 50 copies/mL at Week 96. Roche
Amplicor®, v1.5 ultra-sensitive assay.
c Pre-specified ITT analysis at Week 48 using as-randomized
cohort: ATV/RTV 78% and LPV/ RTV 76% [difference estimate: 1.7% (95% confidence
interval: -3.8%, 7.1%)].
d Pre-specified ITT analysis at Week 96 using as-randomized
cohort: ATV/RTV 74% and LPV/RTV 68% [difference estimate: 6.1% (95% confidence
interval: 0.3%, 12.0%)].
e Includes viral rebound and failure to achieve confirmed HIV
RNA < 50 copies/mL through Week 96. f Includes lost to follow-up, patient's
withdrawal, noncompliance, protocol violation, and other reasons. |
Through 96 weeks of therapy, the proportion of responders among patients with
high viral loads (ie, baseline HIV RNA ≥ 100,000 copies/mL) was comparable
for the REYATAZ/ ritonavir (165 of 223 patients, 74%) and lopinavir/ritonavir
(148 of 222 patients, 67%) arms. At 96 weeks the median increase from baseline
in CD4+ cell count was 261 cells/mm³ for the REYATAZ/ritonavir arm and
273 cells/mm³ for the lopinavir/ ritonavir arm.
Study AI424-034: REYATAZ once daily compared to efavirenz once daily,
each in combination with fixed-dose lamivudine + zidovudine twice daily.
Study AI424-034 was a randomized, double-blind, multicenter trial comparing
REYATAZ (400 mg once daily) to efavirenz (600 mg once daily), each in combination
with a fixed-dose combination of lamivudine (3TC) (150 mg) and zidovudine (ZDV)
(300 mg) given twice daily, in 810 antiretroviral treatment-naive patients.
Patients had a mean age of 34 years (range: 18 to 73), 36% were Hispanic, 33%
were Caucasian, and 65% were male. The mean baseline CD4+ cell count was 321
cells/mm³ (range: 64 to 1424 cells/mm³) and the mean baseline plasma
HIV-1 RNA level was 4.8 log10 copies/mL (range: 2.2 to 5.9 log10 copies/mL).
Treatment response and outcomes through Week 48 are presented in Table 22.
Table 22: Outcomes of Randomized Treatment Through Week 48
(Study AI424-034)
| Outcome |
REYATAZ
400 mg once daily
+ lamivudine
+ zidovudined
(n=405) |
efavirenz
600 mg once
daily+
lamivudine
+ zidovudined
(n=405) |
| Respondera |
67% (32%) |
62% (37%) |
| Virologic failureb |
20% |
21% |
| Rebound |
17% |
16% |
| Never suppressed through Week 48 |
3% |
5% |
| Death |
– |
< 1% |
| Discontinued due to adverse event |
5% |
7% |
| Discontinued for other reasonsc |
8% |
10% |
a Patients achieved and maintained confirmed
HIV RNA < 400 copies/mL ( < 50 copies/mL) through Week 48. Roche Amplicor®
HIV-1 Monitor™ Assay, test version 1.0 or 1.5 as geographically appropriate.
b Includes viral rebound and failure to achieve confirmed HIV
RNA < 400 copies/mL through Week 48.
c Includes lost to follow-up, patient's withdrawal, noncompliance,
protocol violation, and other reasons.
d As a fixed-dose combination: 150 mg lamivudine, 300 mg zidovudine
twice daily. |
Through 48 weeks of therapy, the proportion of responders among patients with
high viral loads (ie, baseline HIV RNA ≥ 100,000 copies/mL) was comparable
for the REYATAZ and efavirenz arms. The mean increase from baseline in CD4+
cell count was 176 cells/mm³ for the REYATAZ arm and 160 cells/mm³
for the efavirenz arm.
Study AI424-008: REYATAZ 400 mg once daily compared to REYATAZ 600 mg
once daily, and compared to nelfinavir 1250 mg twice daily, each in combination
with stavudine and lamivudine twice daily. Study AI424-008 was a 48-week,
randomized, multicenter trial, blinded to dose of REYATAZ, comparing REYATAZ
at two dose levels (400 mg and 600 mg once daily) to nelfinavir (1250 mg twice
daily), each in combination with stavudine (40 mg) and lamivudine (150 mg) given
twice daily, in 467 antiretroviral treatment-naive patients. Patients had a
mean age of 35 years (range: 18 to 69), 55% were Caucasian, and 63% were male.
The mean baseline CD4+ cell count was 295 cells/mm³ (range: 4 to 1003 cells/mm³)
and the mean baseline plasma HIV- 1 RNA level was 4.7 log10 copies/mL (range:
1.8 to 5.9 log10 copies/mL). Treatment response and outcomes through
Week 48 are presented in Table 23.
Table 23: Outcomes of Randomized Treatment Through Week 48
(Study AI424-008)
| Outcome |
REYATAZ
400 mg
once daily
+ lamivudine
+ stavudine
(n=181) |
nelfinavir
1250 mg
twice daily
+ lamivudine
+ stavudine
(n=91) |
| Respondera |
67% (33%) |
59% (38%) |
| Virologic failureb |
24% |
27% |
| Rebound |
14% |
14% |
| Never suppressed through Week 48 |
10% |
13% |
| Death |
< 1% |
– |
| Discontinued due to adverse event |
1% |
3% |
| Discontinued for other reasonsc |
7% |
10% |
a Patients achieved and maintained confirmed
HIV RNA < 400 copies/mL ( < 50 copies/mL) through Week 48. Roche Amplicor®
HIV-1 Monitor™ Assay, test version 1.0 or 1.5 as geographically appropriate.
b Includes viral rebound and failure to achieve confirmed HIV
RNA < 400 copies/mL through Week 48. c Includes lost to follow-up, patient's
withdrawal, noncompliance, protocol violation, and other reasons. |
Through 48 weeks of therapy, the mean increase from baseline in CD4+ cell count
was 234 cells/mm³ for the REYATAZ 400-mg arm and 211 cells/mm³ for
the nelfinavir arm.
Adult Patients With Prior Antiretroviral Therapy
Study AI424-045: REYATAZ once daily + ritonavir once daily compared to
REYATAZ once daily + saquinavir (soft gelatin capsules) once daily, and compared
to lopinavir + ritonavir twice daily, each in combination with tenofovir + one
NRTI. Study AI424-045 is an ongoing, randomized, multicenter trial comparing
REYATAZ (300 mg once daily) with ritonavir (100 mg once daily) to REYATAZ (400
mg once daily) with saquinavir soft gelatin capsules (1200 mg once daily), and
to lopinavir + ritonavir (400/100 mg twice daily), each in combination with
tenofovir and one NRTI, in 347 (of 358 randomized) patients who experienced
virologic failure on HAART regimens containing PIs, NRTIs, and NNRTIs. The mean
time of prior exposure to antiretrovirals was 139 weeks for PIs, 283 weeks for
NRTIs, and 85 weeks for NNRTIs. The mean age was 41 years (range: 24 to 74);
60% were Caucasian, and 78% were male. The mean baseline CD4+ cell count was
338 cells/mm³ (range: 14 to 1543 cells/mm³) and the mean baseline
plasma HIV-1 RNA level was 4.4 log10 copies/mL (range: 2.6 to 5.88 log10 copies/mL).
Treatment outcomes through Week 48 for the REYATAZ/ritonavir and lopinavir/
ritonavir treatment arms are presented in Table 24. REYATAZ/ritonavir and lopinavir/
ritonavir were similar for the primary efficacy outcome measure of time-averaged
difference in change from baseline in HIV RNA level. Study AI424-045 was not
large enough to reach a definitive conclusion that REYATAZ/ritonavir and lopinavir/ritonavir
are equivalent on the secondary efficacy outcome measure of proportions below
the HIV RNA lower limit of detection. [See CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, Tables
19 and 20.]
Table 24: Outcomes of Treatment Through Week 48 in Study
AI424-045 (Patients with Prior Antiretroviral Experience)
| Outcome |
REYATAZ 300 mg
+ ritonavir 100 mg
once daily +
tenofovir + 1 NRTI
(n=119) |
lopinavir/ritonavir
(400/100 mg)
twice daily +
tenofovir +
1 NRTI
(n=118) |
Differencea
(REYATAZ-
lopinavir/ ritonavir)
(CI) |
| HIV RNA Change from Baseline (log10 copies/mL)b |
-1.58 |
-1.70 |
+0.12c
(-0.17, 0.41) |
| Percent of Patients Respondinge HIV RNA < 400 copies/mLb |
55% |
57% |
-2.2%
(-14.8%, 10.5%) |
| HIV RNA <50 copies/mLb |
38% |
45% |
-7.1%
(-19.6%, 5.4%) |
a Time-averaged difference through Week 48 for
HIV RNA; Week 48 difference in HIV RNA percentages and CD4+ mean changes,
REYATAZ/ritonavir vs lopinavir/ritonavir; CI = 97.5% confidence interval
for change in HIV RNA; 95% confidence interval otherwise.
b Roche Amplicor® HIV-1 Monitor™ Assay, test version 1.5.
c Protocol-defined primary efficacy outcome measure.
d Based on patients with baseline and Week 48 CD4+ cell count
measurements (REYATAZ/ritonavir, n=85; lopinavir/ritonavir, n=93).
e Patients achieved and maintained confirmed HIV-1 RNA < 400
copies/mL ( < 50 copies/mL) through Week 48. |
No patients in the REYATAZ/ritonavir treatment arm and three patients in the
lopinavir/ritonavir treatment arm experienced a new-onset CDC Category C event
during the study.
In Study AI424-045, the mean change from baseline in plasma HIV-1 RNA for REYATAZ
400 mg with saquinavir (n=115) was -1.55 log10 copies/mL, and the time-averaged
difference in change in HIV-1 RNA levels versus lopinavir/ritonavir was 0.33.
The corresponding mean increase in CD4+ cell count was 72 cells/mm³. Through
48 weeks of treatment, the proportion of patients in this treatment arm with
plasma HIV-1 RNA < 400 ( < 50) copies/mL was 38% (26%). In this study, coadministration
of REYATAZ and saquinavir did not provide adequate efficacy [see DRUG INTERACTIONS].
Study AI424-045 also compared changes from baseline in lipid values. [See ADVERSE
REACTIONS.]
Study AI424-043: Study AI424-043 was a randomized, open-label,
multicenter trial comparing REYATAZ (400 mg once daily) to lopinavir/ritonavir
(400/100 mg twice daily), each in combination with two NRTIs, in 300 patients
who experienced virologic failure to only one prior PI-containing regimen. Through
48 weeks, the proportion of patients with plasma HIV-1 RNA < 400 ( < 50)
copies/mL was 49% (35%) for patients randomized to REYATAZ (n=144) and 69% (53%)
for patients randomized to lopinavir/ritonavir (n=146). The mean change from
baseline was -1.59 log10 copies/mL in the REYATAZ treatment arm and
-2.02 log10 copies/mL in the lopinavir/ ritonavir arm. Based on the results
of this study, REYATAZ without ritonavir is inferior to lopinavir/ritonavir
in PI-experienced patients with prior virologic failure and is not recommended
for such patients.
Pediatric Patients
Assessment of the pharmacokinetics, safety, tolerability, and efficacy of REYATAZ
is based on data from the open-label, multicenter clinical trial PACTG 1020A
conducted in patients from 3 months to 21 years of age. In this study, 182 patients
(83 antiretroviral-naive and 99 antiretroviral-experienced) received once daily
REYATAZ, with or without ritonavir, in combination with two NRTIs.
Ninety-nine patients (6 to less than 18 years of age) treated with the REYATAZ
capsule formulation, with or without ritonavir, were evaluated. In this cohort,
the overall proportions of antiretroviral-naive and -experienced patients with
HIV RNA < 400 copies/mL at week 24 were 68% (28/41) and 33% (19/58), respectively.
The overall proportions of antiretroviral-naive and -experienced patients with
HIV RNA < 50 copies/mL at week 24 were 59% (24/41) and 24% (14/58), respectively.
The median increase from baseline in absolute CD4 count at 20 weeks of therapy
was 171 cells/mm³ in antiretroviral-naive patients and 116 cells/mm³
in antiretroviralexperienced patients.
Last updated on RxList: 11/20/2009