Congenital sucrase-isomaltase deficiency (CSID) is a chronic, autosomal recessive,
inherited, phenotypically heterogeneous disease with very variable enzyme activity.
CSID is usually characterized by a complete or almost complete lack of endogenous
sucrase activity, a very marked reduction in isomaltase activity, a moderate
decrease in maltase activity and normal lactase levels. Sucrase is naturally
produced in the brush border of the small intestine, primarily the distal duodenum
and jejunum. Sucrase hydrolyzes the disaccharide sucrose into its component
monosaccharides, glucose and fructose. Isomaltase breaks down disaccharides
from starch into simple sugars.
Sucraid® does not contain isomaltase. In the absence of endogenous human
sucrase, as in CSID, sucrose is not metabolized. Unhydrolyzed sucrose and starch
are not absorbed from the intestine and their presence in the intestinal lumen
may lead to osmotic retention of water. This may result in loose stools. Unabsorbed
sucrose in the colon is fermented by bacterial flora to produce increased amounts
of hydrogen, methane and water. As a consequence, excessive gas, bloating, abdominal
cramps, nausea and vomiting may occur. Chronic malabsorption of disaccharides
may result in malnutrition.
Undiagnosed/untreated CSID patients often fail to thrive and fall behind in
their expected growth and development curves. Previously, the treatment of CSID
has required the continual use of a strict sucrose-free diet.
CSID is often difficult to diagnose. Approximately 4% to 10% of pediatric patients
with chronic diarrhea of unknown origin have CSID.
Measurement of expired breath hydrogen under controlled conditions following
a sucrose challenge ( a measurement of excess hydrogen excreted in exhalation)
in CSID patients has shown levels as great as 6 times that in normal subjects.
A generally accepted clinical definition of CSID is that of a condition characterized
by the following: stool pH <6, an increase in breath hydrogen of > 10ppm
when challenged with sucrose after fasting and a negative lactose breath test.
However, because of the difficulties in diagnosing CSID, it may be warranted
to conduct a short therapeutic trial (e.g. one week) to assess response in patients
suspected of having CSID.
Clinical Studies
A two-phase (dose response preceded by a breath hydrogen phase) double-blind,
multi-site, crossover trial was conducted in 28 patients (aged 4 months to 11.5
years) with confirmed CSID. During the dose response phase the patients were
challenged with an ordinary sucrose containing diet while receiving each of
four doses of sacrosidase: full strength (9000 I.U./mL) and three dilutions
1:10 (900 I.U./mL), 1:100 (90 I.U./mL) and 1:1000 (9I.U/mL) in random order
for a period of 10 days. Patients who weighed no more than 15kg received 1mL
per meal; those weighing more than 15kg received 2mL per meal. The dose did
not vary with age or sucrose intake. A dose-response relationship was shown
between the two higher and the two lower doses. The two higher doses of sacrosidase
were associated with significantly fewer total stools and higher proportions
of patients having lower total symptom scores, the primary efficacy end-points.
In addition, higher doses of sacrosidase were associated with a significantly
greater number of hard and formed stools as well as with fewer watery and soft
stools, the secondary efficacy end-points. Analysis of the overall symptomatic
response as a function of age indicated that in CSID patients up to 3 years
of age, 86% became asymptomatic. In patients over 3 years of age 77% became
asymptomatic. Thus, the therapeutic response did not differ significantly according
to age. A second study of similar design and execution as the first used 4 different
dilutions of sacrosidase 1:100 (90 I.U./mL) 1:1000 (9 I.U./mL) 1:10,000 (0.9
I.U./ml) 1:100,000 (0.09I.U/mL). There were inconsistent results with regards
to the primary efficacy parameters. In both trials however, patients showed
a marked decrease in breath hydrogen output when they received sacrosidase in
comparison to placebo.
Last updated on RxList: 2/13/2009