Suprax, given orally, is about 40%-50% absorbed whether administered with or
without food; however, time to maximal absorption is increased approximately
0.8 hours when administered with food. The oral suspension produces average
peak concentrations approximately 25%-50% higher than the tablets, when tested
in normal adult volunteers. Two hundred and 400 mg doses of oral suspension
produce average peak concentrations of 3 mcg/mL (range 1 to 4.5 mcg/mL) and
4.6 mcg/mL (range 1.9 to 7.7 mcg/mL), respectively, when tested in normal adult
volunteers. The area under the time versus concentration curve is greater by
approximately 10%-25% with the oral suspension than with the tablet after doses
of 100 to 400 mg, when tested in normal adult volunteers. This increased
absorption should be taken into consideration if the oral suspension is to be
substituted for the tablet. Because of the lack of bioequivalence, tablets should
not be substituted for oral suspension in the treatment of otitis media. (See
DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION). Cross-over studies
of tablet versus suspension have not been performed in children.
Peak serum concentrations occur between 2 and 6 hours following oral administration of 400 mg of Cefixime suspension. Peak serum concentrations occur between 2 and 5 hours following a single administration of 200 mg of suspension.
TABLE
| Serum Levels of Cefixime after Administration of Tablets
(mcg/mL) |
| DOSE |
|
2h |
4h |
6h |
8h |
12h |
24h |
| 100 mg |
0.3 |
0.8 |
1 |
0.7 |
0.4 |
0.2 |
0.02 |
| 200 mg |
0.7 |
1.4 |
2 |
1.5 |
1 |
0.4 |
0.03 |
| 400 mg |
1.2 |
2.5 |
3.5 |
2.7 |
1.7 |
0.6 |
0.04 |
| Serum Levels of Cefixime after Administration of Oral Suspension
(mcg/mL) |
| DOSE |
1h |
2h |
4h |
6h |
8h |
12h |
24h |
| 100 mg |
0.7 |
1.1 |
1.3 |
0.9 |
0.6 |
0.2 |
0.02 |
| 200 mg |
1.2 |
2.1 |
2.8 |
2 |
1.3 |
0.5 |
0.07 |
| 400 mg |
1.8 |
3.3 |
4.4 |
3.3 |
2.2 |
0.8 |
0.07 |
Approximately 50% of the absorbed dose is excreted unchanged in the urine in 24 hours. In animal studies, it was noted that cefixime is also excreted in the bile in excess of 10% of the administered dose. Serum protein binding is concentration independent with a bound fraction of approximately 65%. In a multiple dose study conducted with a research formulation which is less bioavailable than the tablet or suspension, there was little accumulation of drug in serum or urine after dosing for 14 days. The serum half-life of cefixime in healthy subjects is independent of dosage form and averages 3-4 hours but may range up to 9 hours in some normal volunteers. Average AUCs at steady state in elderly patients are approximately 40% higher than average AUCs in other healthy adults.
In subjects with moderate impairment of renal function (20 to 40 mL/min creatinine
clearance), the average serum half-life of cefixime is prolonged to 6.4 hours.
In severe renal impairment (5 to 20 mL/min creatinine clearance), the half-life
increased to an average of 11.5 hours. The drug is not cleared significantly
from the blood by hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis. However, a study indicated
that with doses of 400 mg, patients undergoing hemodialysis have similar blood
profiles as subjects with creatinine clearances of 21-60 mL/min. There is no
evidence of metabolism of cefixime in vivo.
Adequate data on CSF levels of cefixime are not available.
Microbiology
As with other cephalosporins, bactericidal action of cefixime results from
inhibition of cell- wall synthesis. Cefixime is highly stable in the presence
of beta-lactamase enzymes. As a result, many organisms resistant to penicillins
and some cephalosporins due to the presence of beta-lactamases, may be susceptible
to cefixime. Cefixime has been shown to be active against most strains of the
following organisms both in vitro and in clinical infections (see INDICATIONS):
Gram-positive Organisms.
Streptococcus pneumoniae,
Streptococcus pyogenes.
Gram-negative Organisms.
Haemophilus influenzae
(beta-lactamase positive and negative strains),
Moraxella (Branhamella) catarrhalis
(most of which are beta-lactamase positive),
Escherichia coli,
Proteus mirabilis,
Neisseria gonorrhoeae
(including penicillinase- and non-penicillinase-producing strains).
Cefixime has been shown to be active in vitro against most strains of
the following organisms; however, clinical efficacy has not been established.
Gram-positive Organisms.
Streptococcus agalactiae.
Gram-negative Organisms.
Haemophilus parainfluenzae
(beta-lactamase positive and negative strains),
Proteus vulgaris,
Klebsiella pneumoniae,
Klebsiella oxytoca,
Pasteurella multocida,
Providencia species,
Salmonella species,
Shigella species,
Citrobacter amalonaticus,
Citrobacter diversus,
Serratia marcescens.
Note: Pseudomonas species, strains of group D streptococci (including
enterococci), Listeria monocytogenes, most strains of staphylococci (including
methicillin-resistant strains) and most strains of Enterobacter are resistant
to cefixime. In addition, most strains of Bacteroides fragilis and Clostridia
are resistant to cefixime.
Susceptibility Testing
Susceptibility Tests:
Diffusion Techniques
Quantitative methods that require measurement of zone diameters give an estimate
of antibiotic susceptibility. One such procedure1-3 has been recommended
for use with disks to test susceptibility to cefixime. Interpretation involves
correlation of the diameters obtained in the disk test with minimum inhibitory
concentration (MIC) for cefixime.
Reports from the laboratory giving results of the standard single-disk susceptibility test with a 5-mcg cefixime disk should be interpreted according to the following criteria:
| Recommended Susceptibility Ranges: Agar Disk Diffusion |
| Organisms |
Resistant |
Moderately
Susceptible |
Susceptible |
| Neisseria gonorrhoeaea |
-- |
-- |
≥ 31 mm |
| All other organisms |
≤ 15 mm |
16 - 18 mm |
≥ 19 mm |
| a Using GC Agar Base with a defined 1% supplement
without cysteine. |
A report of "Susceptible" indicates that the pathogen is likely to be inhibited by generally achievable blood levels. A report of "Moderately Susceptible" indicates that inhibitory concentrations of the antibiotic may well be achieved if high dosage is used or if the infection is confined to tissues and fluids (e.g. urine) in which high antibiotic levels are attained. A report of "Resistant" indicates that achievable concentrations of the antibiotic are unlikely to be inhibitory and other therapy should be selected.
Standardized procedures require the use of laboratory control organisms. The 5-mcg disk should give the following zone diameter:
| Organism |
Zone diameter (mm) |
| E. coli ATCC 25922 |
23-27 |
| N. gonorrhoeae ATCC 49226a |
37-45 |
| a Using GC Agar Base with a defined 1% supplement
without cysteine. |
The class disk for cephalosporin susceptibility testing (the cephalothin disk)
is not appropriate because of spectrum differences with cefixime. The 5-mcg
cefixime disk should be used for all in vitro testing of isolates.
Dilution Techniques
Broth or agar dilution methods can be used to determine the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) value for susceptibility of bacterial isolates to cefixime. The recommended susceptibility breakpoints are as follows:
| MIC Interpretive Standards (mcg/mL) |
| Organisms |
Resistant |
Moderately
Susceptible |
Susceptible |
| Neisseria gonorrhoeaea |
-- |
-- |
≤ 0.25 |
| All other organisms |
≥ 4 |
2 |
≤ 1 |
As with standard diffusion methods, dilution procedures require the use of laboratory control organisms. Standard cefixime powder should give the following MIC ranges in daily testing of quality control organisms:
| Organism |
MIC range (mcg/mL) |
| E. coli ATCC 25922 |
0.25-1 |
| S. aureus ATCC 29213 |
8-32 |
| N. gonorrhoeae ATCC 49226a |
0.008-0.03 |
| a Using GC Agar Base with a defined 1% supplement
without cysteine. |
Clinical Studies
In clinical trials of otitis media in nearly 400 children between the ages
of 6 months to 10 years, Streptococcus pneumoniae was isolated from 47%
of the patients, Haemophilus influenzae from 34%, Moraxella (Branhamella)
catarrhalis from 15% and S. pyogenes from 4%.
The overall response rate of Streptococcus pneumoniae to cefixime was
approximately 10% lower and that of Haemophilus influenzae or Moraxella
(Branhamella) catarrhalis approximately 7% higher (12% when beta-lactamase
positive strains of H. influenzae are included) than the response rates
of these organisms to the active control drugs.
In these studies, patients were randomized and treated with either cefixime
at dose regimens of 4 mg/kg BID or 8 mg/kg QD, or with a standard antibiotic
regimen. Sixty-nine to 70% of the patients in each group had resolution of signs
and symptoms of otitis media when evaluated 2 to 4 weeks post-treatment, but
persistent effusion was found in 15% of the patients. When evaluated at the
completion of therapy, 17% of patients receiving cefixime and 14% of patients
receiving effective comparative drugs (18% including those patients who had
Haemophilus influenzae resistant to the control drug and who received
the control antibiotic) were considered to be treatment failures. By the 2 to
4 week follow-up, a total of 30%-31% of patients had evidence of either treatment
failure or recurrent disease.
| Bacteriological Outcome of Otitis Media
at Two to Four Weeks Post-Therapy Based on Repeat Middle Ear Fluid Culture
or Extrapolation from Clinical Outcome |
| Organism |
Cefixime(a)
4 mg/kg BID |
Cefixime(a)
8 mg/kg QD |
Control(a)
drugs |
| Streptococcus pneumoniae |
48/70 (69%) |
18/22 (82%) |
82/100 (82%) |
| Haemophilus influenzae beta-lactamase negative |
24/34 (71%) |
13/17 (76%) |
23/34 (68%) |
| Haemophilus influenzae beta-lactamase positive |
17/22 (77%) |
9/12 (75%) |
1/1 (b) |
| Moraxella (Branhamella) catarrhalis |
26/31 (84%) |
5/5 |
18/24 (75%) |
| S. pyogenes |
5/5 |
3/3 |
6/7 |
| All Isolates |
120/162 (74%) |
48/59 (81%) |
130/166 (78%) |
(a) Number eradicated/number isolated.
(b) An additional 20 beta-lactamase positive strains
of Haemophilus influenzae were isolated, but were excluded from this
analysis because they were resistant to the control antibiotic. In nineteen
of these, the clinical course could be assessed and a favorable outcome
occurred in 10. When these cases are included in the overall bacteriological
evaluation of therapy with the control drugs, 140/185 (76%) of pathogens
were considered to be eradicated. |
REFERENCES
1. Bauer AW, Kirby WMM, Sherris JC, et al.: Antibiotic
susceptibility testing by a standard single disk method. Am J Clin Pathol
1966; 45:493.
2. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, Approved Standard: Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Disk Susceptibility Tests (M2-A3), December 1984.
3. Standardized disk susceptibility test. Federal Register 1974; 39 (May 30): 19182- 19184.
Last updated on RxList: 12/21/2007