Clinical Studies
The safety and effectiveness of Synvisc were studied in
patients ≥ 40 years old in the three concurrently controlled clinical
trials. The three studies investigated a total of 136 women and 81 men. The
demographics of trial participants were comparable across treatment groups with regard to age, gender and duration of
osteoarthritis, except that there was a significantly greater (p = 0.04)
number of men in the Synvisc group and women in the control group in
one study (see Table 1).
One study was a multicenter study conducted at four sites in Germany. This was a randomized, double-blind prospective
clinical trial with two treatment groups. The study compared the
safety and effectiveness of three weekly intra-articular injections of
Synvisc and of physiological saline in 103 subjects (109 knees) with osteoarthritis of the knee over a 26-week period.
TABLE 1 - DEMOGRAPHIC DATA1
| |
DEMOGRAPHIC VARIABLE |
| Age |
Gender [N2 (%)] |
Duration of
Osteoarthritis
(years) |
| M |
F |
| German Multicenter3 |
| Synvisc |
62.3 |
21(45%) |
26(55%) |
5.4 |
| Saline |
64.7 |
13(25%) |
39(75%) |
5.6 |
| P (Synvisc/Saline) |
0.3 |
0.04 |
0.9 |
| German Single Center |
| Synvisc |
59.8 |
10(71%) |
4(29%) |
2.4 |
| Saline |
59.5 |
8(53%) |
7(47%) |
2.5 |
| P (Synvisc/Saline) |
0.9 |
0.3 |
1.0 |
| U.S. Multicenter4 |
| Synvisc |
62.9 |
17(39%) |
27(61%) |
8.9 |
| Arthrocenteses |
67.1 |
12(29%) |
30(71%) |
7.9 |
| P (Synvisc/Arthrocenteses) |
0.06 |
0.3 |
0.5 |
Footnotes: 1 Patients ≥ 40 years old and received the complete treatment course
2 N = number of patients
3 In addition, 1 male and 3 females were treated with Synvisc in one knee and saline in the other
4 In addition, 4 females were treated with Synvisc in one knee and arthrocenteses in the other |
TABLE 2 - CONCURRENT OSTEOARTHRITIS THERAPIES1
| CONCURRENT MEDICATIONS2 |
TREATED KNEES |
P Synvisc/
Control |
| |
TOTAL |
Synvisc |
Control |
| German Multicenter |
N3=109 |
N=52 |
N=57 |
|
| Medications [N (%)]4 |
27 (25%) |
5 (10%) |
22 (39%) |
0.001 |
| NSAIDS |
17 (16%) |
4 (8%) |
13 (23%) |
0.03 |
| Acetaminophen |
7 (6%) |
1 (2%) |
6 (11%) |
0.07 |
| Other medications5 |
3 (3%) |
3 (5%) |
0 (0%) |
0.09 |
| German Single Center6 |
N=29 |
N=14 |
N=15 |
NA |
| Any concurrent medication [N (%)] |
NA7 |
NA |
NA |
0.6 |
| U.S. Multicenter8 |
N=103 |
N=51 |
N=52 |
|
| Acetaminophen [N (%)] |
100 (97%) |
50 (98%) |
50 (96%) |
|
Footnotes: 1 Patients ≥ 40
years old and received the complete treatment course
2 Individual patients may be represented by more than one therapy
3 N = number of knees
4 Number and percentage of subjects
5 Medications not approved in the U.S.
6 No concurrent therapies were recorded
7 Data not collected
8 Only acetaminophen was allowed |
A significantly greater number of saline-treated patients
took concurrent osteoarthritis medications than did patients treated with Synvisc (see Table 2). While both the Synvisc and the
saline-treated groups improved significantly as compared to baseline in all
effectiveness measures, the Synvisc group showed a significantly greater improvement in all outcome measures than did the
saline-treated patients over a 26-week period (see Tables 3A and 3B).
A second study conducted at a single center in Germany4 was
a concurrently controlled, randomized, double-blind
prospective clinical trial with two treatment groups. This study compared the
safety and effectiveness over a 26-week period of three weekly
intra-articular injections of Synvisc and of physiological saline in 29
subjects (29 knees) with osteoarthritis of the knee. The results of
the study were similar to those in the German multicenter study,
except that the significance levels in most comparisons were smaller
(see Tables 3A and 3B). In both of these studies the most pain
relief and the greatest amount of treatment success occurred 8 to 12
weeks after Synvisc treatment began.
Investigators obtained data at 26 weeks by telephone
interviews. A validation study suggested that the results obtained in
telephone interviews are equivalent to those obtained in office
visits. Since investigators did not follow patients beyond week 26, the
duration of pain relief beyond 26 weeks is not known.
A third study was a prospective, concurrently controlled,
randomized, double-blind multicenter study conducted in 90 subjects (103 knees) at five U.S. sites. The study compared the safety and
effectiveness of three weekly intra-articular injections of Synvisc and of three weekly arthrocenteses in subjects with osteoarthritis
of the knee over a four-week period after the first injection or
arthrocentesis.
Both the Synvisc-treated and the arthrocentesis-treated
groups improved significantly as compared to baseline in all
effectiveness measures. However, there were no significant differences
between the Synvisc-treated and arthrocentesis-treated patients at any
time during the four-week evaIuation period (see Tables 3A and 3B).
TABLE 3A - EFFECTIVENESS OF WEIGHT-BEARING PAIN1
EVALUATED BY PATIENTS
| Week |
Base-line |
Improvement(Change from Baseline) |
| 0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
8 |
12 |
266 |
| German Multicenter Synvisc-treated |
| Mean2 |
69.7 |
12.0 |
26.5 |
37.9 |
NA5 |
45.9 |
46.5 |
34.0 |
| P3 |
|
0.0001 |
0.0001 |
0.0001 |
|
0.0001 |
0.0001 |
0.0001 |
| Saline-treated |
| Mean |
75.1 |
9.0 |
17.0 |
23.0 |
NA |
16.8 |
16.4 |
19.1 |
| P3 |
|
0.0001 |
0.0001 |
0.0001 |
|
0.0001 |
0.0002 |
0.0001 |
| P4 |
0.1 |
0.3 |
0.01 |
0.0008 |
NA |
< 0.0001 |
0.0001 |
0.005 |
| German Single Center Synvisc-treated |
| Mean |
65.2 |
10.6 |
31.8 |
43.9 |
NA |
51.7 |
53.5 |
44.5 |
| P3 |
|
0.02 |
0.0001 |
0.0001 |
|
0.0001 |
0.0001 |
0.0001 |
| Saline-treated |
| Mean |
69.8 |
5.4 |
19.3 |
25.4 |
NA |
24.4 |
26.8 |
21.2 |
| P3 |
|
0.01 |
0.0001 |
0.0001 |
|
0.0001 |
0.0001 |
0.002 |
| P4 |
0.4 |
0.2 |
0.03 |
0.01 |
NA |
0.0001 |
0.0001 |
0.001 |
| U.S. Multicenter Synvisc-treated |
| Mean |
67.3 |
12.9 |
18.9 |
NA |
21.3 |
NA |
NA |
NA |
| P3 |
|
0.0002 |
0.0001 |
|
0.0001 |
|
|
|
| Arthrocenteses |
| Mean |
69.4 |
9.4 |
21.2 |
NA |
19.1 |
NA |
NA |
NA |
| P3 |
|
0.01 |
0.0001 |
|
0.0002 |
|
|
|
| P4 |
0.6 |
0.5 |
0.7 |
NA |
0.7 |
NA |
NA |
NA |
Footnotes: 1 Patients ≥ 40 years old and received the complete treatment course
2 Mean of assessments on VAS of 0 to 100 mm
3 Significance from baseline
4 Significance between Synvisc and control
5 NA = no measurement taken
6 Week 26 data based on patient telephone interviews rather than patient office visit |
TABLE 3B - EFFECTIVENESS OF NIGHT PAIN1 EVALUATED BY PATIENTS
| Week |
Base-line |
Improvement (Change from Baseline) |
| 0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
8 |
12 |
266 |
| German Multicenter Synvisc-treated |
| Mean2 |
41.6 |
9.2 |
20.0 |
26.4 |
NA5 |
28.3 |
29.8 |
24.3 |
| P3 |
|
0.0001 |
0.0001 |
0.0001 |
|
0.0001 |
0.0001 |
0.0001 |
| Saline-treated |
| Mean |
45.7 |
9.5 |
15.2 |
21.2 |
NA |
18.4 |
17.3 |
12.8 |
| P3 |
|
0.0001 |
0.0001 |
0.0001 |
|
0.0001 |
0.0001 |
0.002 |
| P4 |
0.5 |
0.9 |
0.2 |
0.3 |
NA |
0.05 |
0.02 |
0.03 |
| German Single Center Synvisc-treated |
| Mean |
31.8 |
8.4 |
17.7 |
24.8 |
NA |
28.9 |
29.5 |
25.4 |
| P3 |
|
0.04 |
0.005 |
0.004 |
|
0.005 |
0.005 |
0.004 |
| Saline-treated |
| Mean |
33.3 |
4.5 |
13.1 |
16.1 |
NA |
16.1 |
17.9 |
14.9 |
| P3 |
|
0.1 |
0.001 |
0.0007 |
|
0.0001 |
0.0001 |
0.01 |
| P4 |
0.9 |
0.4 |
0.4 |
0.3 |
NA |
0.1 |
0.2 |
0.2 |
| U.S. Multicenter Synvisc-treated |
| Mean |
61.0 |
19.0 |
17.9 |
NA |
22.8 |
NA |
NA |
NA |
| P3 |
|
0.0001 |
0.0001 |
|
0.0001 |
|
|
|
| Arthrocenteses |
| Mean |
76.0 |
23.3 |
36.3 |
NA |
29.8 |
NA |
NA |
NA |
| P3 |
|
0.0001 |
0.0001 |
|
0.0001 |
|
|
|
| P4 |
0.002 |
0.5 |
0.004 |
NA |
0.3 |
NA |
NA |
NA |
Footnotes: 1 Patients ≥ 40 years old and received the complete treatment course
2 Mean of assessments on VAS of 0 to 100 mm
3 Significance from baseline
4 Significance between Synvisc and control
5 NA = no measurement taken
6 Week 26 data based on patient telephone interviews rather than patient office visit |
Covariate analyses with the covariates of center, presence
or absence of previous treatments, baseline levels of outcome
measures, age, gender, body mass, effusion, baseline X-ray score,
duration of osteoarthritis, treatment of contralateral knee, and
presence or absence of concurrent therapies, did not reveal any
factors that significantly affected the results of any of the three
studies.
The German studies and the U.S. study differed in several
respects, including inclusion of patients with effusions, length of no
treatment period prior to Synvisc injection, nature of control
treatment, final evaluation time, mean duration of disease, mean weight, prior
treatments for OA, pain and X-ray inclusion criteria. Thus, the German and the U.S. studies, which gave different results,
investigated different patient populations and compared Synvisc with different
control treatments.
Although success criteria for safety were not specified in
any of the three studies, adverse events were enumerated in each study. These events are included in the “Adverse Events” section.
REFERENCE
4Scale, D., Wobig, M. and Wolpert, W. (1994). Viscosupplementation
of osteoarthritic knees with hylan: a treatment schedule study. Curr Ther Res;
55:220-232.
Last updated on RxList: 3/30/2009