Microbiology
Mechanism of Action
Oseltamivir phosphate is an ethyl ester prodrug requiring ester hydrolysis for conversion to the active form, oseltamivir carboxylate. Oseltamivir carboxylate is an inhibitor of influenza virus neuraminidase affecting release of viral particles.
Antiviral Activity
The antiviral activity of oseltamivir carboxylate against laboratory strains
and clinical isolates of influenza virus was determined in cell culture assays.
The concentrations of oseltamivir carboxylate required for inhibition of influenza
virus were highly variable depending on the assay method used and the virus
tested. The 50% and 90% effective concentrations (EC50 and EC90)
were in the range of 0.0008 µM to > 35 µM and 0.004 µM to > 100 µM, respectively
(1 µM=0.284 µg/mL). The relationship between the antiviral activity
in cell culture and the inhibition of influenza virus replication in humans
has not been established.
Resistance
Influenza A virus isolates with reduced susceptibility to oseltamivir carboxylate
have been recovered by serial passage of virus in cell culture in the presence
of increasing concentrations of oseltamivir carboxylate. Genetic analysis of
these isolates showed that reduced susceptibility to oseltamivir carboxylate
is associated with mutations that result in amino acid changes in the viral
neuraminidase or viral hemagglutinin or both. Resistance substitutions selected
in cell culture in neuraminidase are I222T and H274Y in influenza A N1 and I222T
and R292K in influenza A N2. Substitutions E119V, R292K and R305Q have been
selected in avian influenza A neuraminidase N9. Substitutions A28T and R124M
have been selected in the hemagglutinin of influenza A H3N2 and substitution
H154Q in the hemagglutinin of a reassortant human/avian virus H1N9.
In clinical studies in the treatment of naturally acquired infection with influenza
virus, 1.3% (4/301) of posttreatment isolates in adult patients and adolescents,
and 8.6% (9/105) in pediatric patients aged 1 to 12 years showed emergence of
influenza variants with decreased neuraminidase susceptibility in cell culture
to oseltamivir carboxylate. Substitutions in influenza A neuraminidase resulting
in decreased susceptibility were H274Y in neuraminidase N1 and E119V and R292K
in neuraminidase N2. Insufficient information is available to fully characterize
the risk of emergence of TAMIFLU resistance in clinical use.
In clinical studies of postexposure and seasonal prophylaxis, determination
of resistance by population nucleotide sequence analysis was limited by the
low overall incidence rate of influenza infection and prophylactic effect of
TAMIFLU.
Cross-resistance
Cross-resistance between zanamivir-resistant influenza mutants and oseltamivir-resistant influenza mutants has been observed in cell culture. Due to limitations in the assays available to detect drug-induced shifts in virus susceptibility, an estimate of the incidence of oseltamivir resistance and possible cross-resistance to zanamivir in clinical isolates cannot be made. However, two of the three oseltamivir-induced substitutions (E119V, H274Y and R292K) in the viral neuraminidase from clinical isolates occur at the same amino acid residues as two of the three substitutions (E119G/A/D, R152K and R292K) observed in zanamivir-resistant virus.
Immune Response
No influenza vaccine interaction study has been conducted. In studies of naturally acquired and experimental influenza, treatment with TAMIFLU did not impair normal humoral antibody response to infection.
Pharmacokinetics
Absorption and Bioavailability
Oseltamivir is readily absorbed from the gastrointestinal tract after oral
administration of oseltamivir phosphate and is extensively converted predominantly
by hepatic esterases to oseltamivir carboxylate. At least 75% of an oral dose
reaches the systemic circulation as oseltamivir carboxylate. Exposure to oseltamivir
is less than 5% of the total exposure after oral dosing (see Table 1).
Table 1: Mean (% CV) Pharmacokinetic Parameters of Oseltamivir
and Oseltamivir Carboxylate After a Multiple 75 mg Capsule Twice Daily Oral
Dose (n=20)
| Parameter |
Oseltamivir |
Oseltamivir
Carboxylate |
| Cmax (ng/mL) |
65.2 (26) |
348 (18) |
| AUC0-12h (ng·h/mL) |
112 (25) |
2719 (20) |
Plasma concentrations of oseltamivir carboxylate are proportional to doses
up to 500 mg given twice daily (see DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION).
Coadministration with food has no significant effect on the peak plasma concentration
(551 ng/mL under fasted conditions and 441 ng/mL under fed conditions) and the
area under the plasma concentration time curve (6218 ng·h/mL under fasted conditions
and 6069 ng·h/mL under fed conditions)of oseltamivir carboxylate.
Distribution
The volume of distribution (Vss) of oseltamivir carboxylate, following
intravenous administration in 24 subjects, ranged between 23 and 26 liters.
The binding of oseltamivir carboxylate to human plasma protein is low (3%). The binding of oseltamivir to human plasma protein is 42%, which is insufficient to cause significant displacement-based drug interactions.
Metabolism
Oseltamivir is extensively converted to oseltamivir carboxylate by esterases located predominantly in the liver. Neither oseltamivir nor oseltamivir carboxylate is a substrate for, or inhibitor of, cytochrome P450 isoforms.
Elimination
Absorbed oseltamivir is primarily ( > 90%) eliminated by conversion to oseltamivir carboxylate. Plasma concentrations of oseltamivir declined with a half-life of 1 to 3 hours in most subjects after oral administration. Oseltamivir carboxylate is not further metabolized and is eliminated in the urine. Plasma concentrations of oseltamivir carboxylate declined with a half-life of 6 to 10 hours in most subjects after oral administration. Oseltamivir carboxylate is eliminated entirely ( > 99%) by renal excretion. Renal clearance (18.8 L/h) exceeds glomerular filtration rate (7.5 L/h) indicating that tubular secretion occurs, in addition to glomerular filtration. Less than 20% of an oral radiolabeled dose is eliminated in feces.
Special Populations
Renal Impairment
Administration of 100 mg of oseltamivir phosphate twice daily for 5 days to
patients with various degrees of renal impairment showed that exposure to oseltamivir
carboxylate is inversely proportional to declining renal function. Oseltamivir
carboxylate exposures in patients with normal and abnormal renal function administered
various dose regimens of oseltamivir are described in Table 2.
Table 2: Oseltamivir Carboxylate Exposures in Patients With
Normal and Reduced Serum Creatinine Clearance
| Parameter |
Normal Renal Function |
Impaired Renal Function |
| |
75 mg qd |
75 mg bid |
150 mg bid |
Creatinine Clearance
<10 mL/min |
Creatinine Clearance
>10 and <30 mL/min |
| |
|
|
|
CAPD |
Hemodialysis |
75 mg daily |
75 mg alternate days |
30 mg daily |
| 30 mg weekly |
30 mg alternate HD cycle |
| Cmax |
259* |
348* |
705* |
766 |
850 |
1638 |
1175 |
655 |
| Cmin |
39* |
138* |
288* |
62 |
48 |
864 |
209 |
346 |
| AUC48 |
7476* |
10876* |
21864* |
17381 |
12429 |
62636 |
21999 |
25054 |
*Observed values.All other values are predicted.
AUC normalized to 48 hours. |
Hepatic Impairment
In clinical studies oseltamivir carboxylate exposure was not altered in patients
with mild or moderate hepatic impairment (see PRECAUTIONS:
Hepatic Impairment and DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION).
Pediatric Patients
The pharmacokinetics of oseltamivir and oseltamivir carboxylate have been evaluated
in a single dose pharmacokinetic study in pediatric patients aged 5 to 16 years
(n=18) and in a small number of pediatric patients aged 3 to 12 years (n=5)
enrolled in a clinical trial. Younger pediatric patients cleared both the prodrug
and the active metabolite faster than adult patients resulting in a lower exposure
for a given mg/kg dose. For oseltamivir carboxylate, apparent total clearance
decreases linearly with increasing age (up to 12 years). The pharmacokinetics
of oseltamivir in pediatric patients over 12 years of age are similar to those
in adult patients.
Geriatric Patients
Exposure to oseltamivir carboxylate at steady-state was 25% to 35% higher in
geriatric patients (age range 65 to 78 years) compared to young adults given
comparable doses of oseltamivir. Half-lives observed in the geriatric patients
were similar to those seen in young adults. Based on drug exposure and tolerability,
dose adjustments are not required for geriatric patients for either treatment
or prophylaxis (see DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION:
Special Dosage Instructions).
Description of Clinical Studies: Studies in Naturally Occurring Influenza
Treatment of Influenza
Adult Patients
Two phase III placebo-controlled and double-blind clinical trials were conducted: one in the USA and one outside the USA. Patients were eligible for these trials if they had fever > 100ºF, accompanied by at least one respiratory symptom (cough, nasal symptoms or sore throat) and at least one systemic symptom (myalgia, chills/sweats, malaise, fatigue or headache) and influenza virus was known to be circulating in the community. In addition, all patients enrolled in the trials were allowed to take fever-reducing medications.
Of 1355 patients enrolled in these two trials, 849 (63%) patients were influenza-infected
(age range 18 to 65 years; median age 34 years; 52% male; 90% Caucasian; 31%
smokers). Of the 849 influenza-infected patients, 95% were infected with influenza
A, 3% with influenza B, and 2% with influenza of unknown type.
TAMIFLU was started within 40 hours of onset of symptoms. Subjects participating
in the trials were required to self-assess the influenza-associated symptoms
as "none", "mild", "moderate" or "severe".
Time to improvement was calculated from the time of treatment initiation to
the time when all symptoms (nasal congestion, sore throat, cough, aches, fatigue,
headaches, and chills/sweats) were assessed as "none" or "mild".
In both studies, at the recommended dose of TAMIFLU 75 mg twice daily for 5
days, there was a 1.3 day reduction in the median time to improvement in influenza-infected
subjects receiving TAMIFLU compared to subjects receiving placebo. Subgroup
analyses of these studies by gender showed no differences in the treatment effect
of TAMIFLU in men and women.
In the treatment of influenza, no increased efficacy was demonstrated in subjects
receiving treatment of 150 mg TAMIFLU twice daily for 5 days.
Geriatric Patients
Three double-blind placebo-controlled treatment trials were conducted in patients
≥ 65 years of age in three consecutive seasons. The enrollment criteria were
similar to that of adult trials with the exception of fever being defined as
> 97.5 F. Of 741 patients enrolled, 476 (65%) patients were influenza-infected.
Of the 476 influenza-infected patients, 95% were infected with influenza type
A and 5% with influenza type B.
In the pooled analysis, at the recommended dose of TAMIFLU 75 mg twice daily
for 5 days, there was a 1 day reduction in the median time to improvement in
influenzainfected subjects receiving TAMIFLU compared to those receiving placebo
(p=NS). However, the magnitude of treatment effect varied between studies.
Pediatric Patients
One double-blind placebo-controlled treatment trial was conducted in pediatric
patients aged 1 to 12 years (median age 5 years), who had fever ( > 100ºF)
plus one respiratory symptom (cough or coryza) when influenza virus was known
to be circulating in the community. Of 698 patients enrolled in this trial,
452 (65%) were influenza-infected (50% male; 68% Caucasian). Of the 452 influenza-infected
patients, 67% were infected with influenza A and 33% with influenza B.
The primary endpoint in this study was the time to freedom from illness, a
composite endpoint which required 4 individual conditions to be met. These were:
alleviation of cough, alleviation of coryza, resolution of fever, and parental
opinion of a return to normal health and activity. TAMIFLU treatment of 2 mg/kg
twice daily, started within 48 hours of onset of symptoms, significantly reduced
the total composite time to freedom from illness by 1.5 days compared to placebo.
Subgroup analyses of this study by gender showed no differences in the treatment
effect of TAMIFLU in males and females.
Prophylaxis of Influenza
Adult Patients
The efficacy of TAMIFLU in preventing naturally occurring influenza illness
has been demonstrated in three seasonal prophylaxis studies and a postexposure
prophylaxis study in households. The primary efficacy parameter for all these
studies was the incidence of laboratory-confirmed clinical influenza. Laboratory-confirmed
clinical influenza was defined as oral temperature ≥ 99.0ºF/37.2ºC plus at
least one respiratory symptom (cough, sore throat, nasal congestion) and at
least one constitutional symptom (aches and pain, fatigue, headache, chills/sweats),
all recorded within 24 hours, plus either a positive virus isolation or a fourfold
increase in virus antibody titers from baseline.
In a pooled analysis of two seasonal prophylaxis studies in healthy unvaccinated
adults (aged 13 to 65 years), TAMIFLU 75 mg once daily taken for 42 days during
a community outbreak reduced the incidence of laboratory-confirmed clinical
influenza from 4.8% (25/519) for the placebo group to 1.2% (6/520) for the TAMIFLU
group.
In a seasonal prophylaxis study in elderly residents of skilled nursing homes,
TAMIFLU 75 mg once daily taken for 42 days reduced the incidence of laboratory-confirmed
clinical influenza from 4.4% (12/272) for the placebo group to 0.4% (1/276)
for the TAMIFLU group. About 80% of this elderly population were vaccinated,
14% of subjects had chronic airway obstructive disorders, and 43% had cardiac
disorders.
In a study of postexposure prophylaxis in household contacts (aged ≥ 13 years)
of an index case, TAMIFLU 75 mg once daily administered within 2 days of onset
of symptoms in the index case and continued for 7 days reduced the incidence
of laboratoryconfirmed clinical influenza from 12% (24/200) in the placebo
group to 1% (2/205) for the TAMIFLU group. Index cases did not receive TAMIFLU
in the study.
Pediatric Patients
The efficacy of TAMIFLU in preventing naturally occurring influenza illness has been demonstrated in a randomized, open-label, postexposure prophylaxis study in households that included children aged 1 to 12 years, both as index cases and as family contacts. All index cases in this study received treatment. The primary efficacy parameter for this study was the incidence of laboratory-confirmed clinical influenza in the household. Laboratory-confirmed clinical influenza was defined as oral temperature ≥ 100 F/37.8 C plus cough and/or coryza recorded within 48 hours, plus either a positive virus isolation or a fourfold or greater increase in virus antibody titers from baseline or at illness visits. Among household contacts 1 to 12 years of age not already shedding virus at baseline, TAMIFLU for Oral Suspension 30 mg to 60 mg taken once daily for 10 days reduced the incidence of laboratory-confirmed clinical influenza from 17% (18/106) in the group not receiving prophylaxis to 3% (3/95) in the group receiving prophylaxis.
Animal Toxicology
In a 2-week study in unweaned rats, administration of a single dose of 1000
mg/kg oseltamivir phosphate to 7-day-old rats resulted in deaths associated
with unusually high exposure to the prodrug. However, at 2000 mg/kg, there were
no deaths or other significant effects in 14-day-old unweaned rats. Further
follow-up investigations of the unexpected deaths of 7-day-old rats at 1000
mg/kg revealed that the concentrations of the prodrug in the brains were approximately
1500-fold those of the brains of adult rats administered the same oral dose
of 1000 mg/kg, and those of the active metabolite were approximately 3-fold
higher. Plasma levels of the prodrug were 10-fold higher in 7-dayold rats as
compared with adult rats. These observations suggest that the levels of oseltamivir
in the brains of rats decrease with increasing age and most likely reflect the
maturation stage of the blood-brain barrier. No adverse effects occurred at
500 mg/kg/day administered to 7- to 21-day-old rats. At this dosage, the exposure
to prodrug was approximately 800-fold the exposure expected in a 1-year-old
child.
Last updated on RxList: 12/4/2008