April 26, 2017
Recommended Topic Related To:


"June 18, 2014 -- Both acupuncture and bee-venom acupuncture improved symptoms in people with Parkinson's disease, a small study shows.

Acupuncture has been used for years in Asia to relieve Parkinso"...




Mechanism of Action

Tolcapone is a selective and reversible inhibitor of catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT).

In mammals, COMT is distributed throughout various organs. The highest activities are in the liver and kidney. COMT also occurs in the heart, lung, smooth and skeletal muscles, intestinal tract, reproductive organs, various glands, adipose tissue, skin, blood cells and neuronal tissues, especially in glial cells. COMT catalyzes the transfer of the methyl group of S-adenosyl-L-methionine to the phenolic group of substrates that contain a catechol structure. Physiological substrates of COMT include dopa, catecholamines (dopamine, norepinephrine, epinephrine) and their hydroxylated metabolites. The function of COMT is the elimination of biologically active catechols and some other hydroxylated metabolites. In the presence of a decarboxylase inhibitor, COMT becomes the major metabolizing enzyme for levodopa catalyzing the metabolism to 3-methoxy-4hydroxy-L-phenylalanine (3-OMD) in the brain and periphery.

The precise mechanism of action of tolcapone is unknown, but it is believed to be related to its ability to inhibit COMT and alter the plasma pharmacokinetics of levodopa. When tolcapone is given in conjunction with levodopa and an aromatic amino acid decarboxylase inhibitor, such as carbidopa, plasma levels of levodopa are more sustained than after administration of levodopa and an aromatic amino acid decarboxylase inhibitor alone. It is believed that these sustained plasma levels of levodopa result in more constant dopaminergic stimulation in the brain, leading to greater effects on the signs and symptoms of Parkinson's disease in patients as well as increased levodopa adverse effects, sometimes requiring a decrease in the dose of levodopa. Tolcapone enters the CNS to a minimal extent, but has been shown to inhibit central COMT activity in animals.


COMT Activity in Erythrocytes

Studies in healthy volunteers have shown that tolcapone reversibly inhibits human erythrocyte catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) activity after oral administration. The inhibition is closely related to plasma tolcapone concentrations. With a 200-mg single dose of tolcapone, maximum inhibition of erythrocyte COMT activity is on average greater than 80%. During multiple dosing with tolcapone (200 mg tid), erythrocyte COMT inhibition at trough tolcapone blood concentrations is 30% to 45%.

Effect on the Pharmacokinetics of Levodopa and its Metabolites

When tolcapone is administered together with levodopa/carbidopa, it increases the relative bioavailability (AUC) of levodopa by approximately twofold. This is due to a decrease in levodopa clearance resulting in a prolongation of the terminal elimination half-life of levodopa (from approximately 2 hours to 3.5 hours). In general, the average peak levodopa plasma concentration (Cmax) and the time of its occurrence (Tmax) are unaffected. The onset of effect occurs after the first administration and is maintained during long-term treatment. Studies in healthy volunteers and Parkinson's disease patients have confirmed that the maximal effect occurs with 100 mg to 200 mg tolcapone. Plasma levels of 3-OMD are markedly and dose-dependently decreased by tolcapone when given with levodopa/carbidopa.

Population pharmacokinetic analyses in patients with Parkinson's disease have shown the same effects of tolcapone on levodopa plasma concentrations that occur in healthy volunteers.

Pharmacokinetics of Tolcapone

Tolcapone pharmacokinetics are linear over the dose range of 50 mg to 400 mg, independent of levodopa/carbidopa co-administration. The elimination half-life of tolcapone is 2 to 3 hours and there is no significant accumulation. With tid dosing of 100 mg or 200 mg, Cmax is approximately 3 μg/mL and 6 μg/mL, respectively.


Tolcapone is rapidly absorbed, with a Tmax of approximately 2 hours. The absolute bioavailability following oral administration is about 65%. Food given within 1 hour before and 2 hours after dosing of tolcapone decreases the relative bioavailability by 10% to 20% (see DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION).


The steady-state volume of distribution of tolcapone is small (9 L). Tolcapone does not distribute widely into tissues due to its high plasma protein binding. The plasma protein binding of tolcapone is > 99.9% over the concentration range of 0.32 to 210 μg/mL. In vitro experiments have shown that tolcapone binds mainly to serum albumin.

Metabolism and Elimination

Tolcapone is almost completely metabolized prior to excretion, with only a very small amount (0.5% of dose) found unchanged in urine. The main metabolic pathway of tolcapone is glucuronidation; the glucuronide conjugate is inactive. In addition, the compound is methylated by COMT to 3-O-methyl-tolcapone. Tolcapone is metabolized to a primary alcohol (hydroxylation of the methyl group), which is subsequently oxidized to the carboxylic acid. In vitro experiments suggest that the oxidation may be catalyzed by cytochrome P450 3A4 and P450 2A6. The reduction to an amine and subsequent N-acetylation occur to a minor extent. After oral administration of a 14C-labeled dose of tolcapone, 60% of labeled material is excreted in urine and 40% in feces. Tolcapone is a low-extraction-ratio drug (extraction ratio = 0.15) with a moderate systemic clearance of about 7 L/h.

Special Populations

Tolcapone pharmacokinetics are independent of sex, age, body weight, and race (Japanese, Black and Caucasian). Polymorphic metabolism is unlikely based on the metabolic pathways involved.

Hepatic Impairment

A study in patients with hepatic impairment has shown that moderate non-cirrhotic liver disease had no impact on the pharmacokinetics of tolcapone. In patients with moderate cirrhotic liver disease (Child-Pugh Class B), however, clearance and volume of distribution of unbound tolcapone was reduced by almost 50%. This reduction may increase the average concentration of unbound drug by twofold (see DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION). TASMAR therapy should not be initiated if the patient exhibits clinical evidence of active liver disease or two SGPT/ALT or SGOT/AST values greater than the upper limit of normal (see BOXED WARNING).

Renal Impairment

The pharmacokinetics of tolcapone have not been investigated in a specific renal impairment study. However, the relationship of renal function and tolcapone pharmacokinetics has been investigated using population pharmacokinetics during clinical trials. The data of more than 400 patients have confirmed that over a wide range of creatinine clearance values (30 mL/min to 130 mL/min) the pharmacokinetics of tolcapone are unaffected by renal function. This could be explained by the fact that only a negligible amount of unchanged tolcapone (0.5%) is excreted in the urine. The glucuronide conjugate of tolcapone is mainly excreted in the urine but is also excreted in the bile. Accumulation of this stable and inactive metabolite should not present a risk in renally impaired patients with creatinine clearance above 25 mL/min (see DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION). Given the very high protein binding of tolcapone, no significant removal of the drug by hemodialysis would be expected.

Drug Interactions


Clinical Studies

The effectiveness of TASMAR as an adjunct to levodopa in the treatment of Parkinson's disease was established in three multicenter randomized controlled trials of 13 to 26 weeks' duration, supported by four 6-week trials whose results were consistent with those of the longer trials. In two of the longer trials, tolcapone was evaluated in patients whose Parkinson's disease was characterized by deterioration in their response to levodopa at the end of a dosing interval (so-called fluctuating patients with wearing-off phenomena). In the remaining trial, tolcapone was evaluated in patients whose response to levodopa was relatively stable (so-called nonfluctuators).

Fluctuating Patients

In two 3-month trials, patients with documented episodes of wearing-off phenomena, despite optimum levodopa therapy, were randomized to receive placebo, tolcapone 100 mg tid or 200 mg tid. The formal double-blind portion of the trial was 3 months long, and the primary outcome was a comparison between treatments in the change from baseline in the amount of time spent “On” (a period of relatively good functioning) and “Off” (a period of relatively poor functioning). Patients recorded periodically, throughout the duration of the trial, the time spent in each of these states.

In addition to the primary outcome, patients were also assessed using sub-parts of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS), a frequently used multi-item rating scale intended to evaluate mentation (Part I), activities of daily living (Part II), motor function (Part III), complications of therapy (Part IV), and disease staging (Parts V and VI); an Investigator's Global Assessment of Change (IGA), a subjective scale designed to assess global functioning in 5 areas of Parkinson's disease; the Sickness Impact Profile (SIP), a multi-item scale in 12 domains designed to assess the patient's functioning in multiple areas; and the change in daily levodopa/carbidopa dose.

In one of the studies, 202 patients were randomized in 11 centers in the United States and Canada. In this trial, all patients were receiving concomitant levodopa and carbidopa. In the second trial, 177 patients were randomized in 24 centers in Europe. In this trial, all patients were receiving concomitant levodopa and benserazide.

The following tables display the results of these 2 trials:

Table 1: US/Canadian Fluctuator Study

Primary Measure Baseline (hrs) Change from Baseline at Month 3 (hrs) p-value*
Hours of Wake Time “Off”**
  Placebo 6.2 -1.2
  100 mg tid 6.4 -2.0 0.169
  200 mg tid 5.9 -3.0 < 0.001
Hours of Wake Time “On”**
  Placebo 8.7 1.4
  100 mg tid 8.1 2.0 0.267
  200 mg tid 9.1 2.9 0.008
Secondary Measures Baseline Change from Baseline at Month 3 p-value*
Levodopa Total Daily Dose (mg)
  Placebo 948 16
  100 mg tid 788 -166 < 0.001
  200 mg tid 865 -207 < 0.001
Global (overall) % Improved
  Placebo 42
  100 mg tid 71 < 0.001
  200 mg tid 91 < 0.001
  Placebo 19.5 -0.4
  100 mg tid 17.6 -1.9 0.217
  200 mg tid 20.6 -2.0 0.210
  Placebo 7.5 -0.3
  100 mg tid 7.7 -0.8 0.487
  200 mg tid 8.3 0.2 0.412
SIP (total)
  Placebo 14.7 -2.2
  100 mg tid 14.9 -0.4 0.210
  200 mg tid 17.6 -0.3 0.216
*Compared to placebo. Nominal p values are not adjusted for multiple comparisons.
**Hours “Off” or “On” are based on the percent of waking day “Off” or “On”, assuming a 16-hour waking day.

Table 2: European Fluctuator Study

Primary Measure Baseline (hrs) Change from Baseline at Month 3 (hrs) p-value*
Hours of Wake Time “Off”**
  Placebo 6.1 -0.7
  100 mg tid 6.5 -2.0 0.008
  200 mg tid  6.0 -1.6 0.081
Hours of Wake Time “On”**
  Placebo 8.5 -0.1
  100 mg tid 8.1 1.7 0.003
  200 mg tid 8.4 1.7 0.003
Secondary Measures Baseline Change from Baseline at Month 3 p-value*
Levodopa Total Daily Dose (mg)
  Placebo 660 -29
  100 mg tid 667 -109 0.025
  200 mg tid 675 -122 0.010
Global (overall) % Improved
  Placebo 37
  100 mg tid 70 0.003
  200 mg tid 78 < 0.001
  Placebo 24.0 -2.1
  100 mg tid 22.4 -4.2 0.163
  200 mg tid 22.4 -6.5 0.004
  Placebo 7.9 -0.5
  100 mg tid 7.5 -0.9 0.408
  200 mg tid 7.7 -1.3 0.097
SIP (total)
  Placebo 21.6 -0.9
  100 mg tid 16.6 -1.9 0.419
  200 mg tid 18.4 -4.2 0.011
*Compared to placebo. Nominal p values are not adjusted for multiple comparisons.
**Hours “Off” or “On” are based on the percent of waking day “Off” or “On”, assuming a 16-hour waking day.

Effects on “Off” time and levodopa dose did not differ by age or sex.

Non-fluctuating Patients

In this study, 298 patients with idiopathic Parkinson's disease on stable doses of levodopa/carbidopa who were not experiencing wearing-off phenomena were randomized to placebo, tolcapone 100 mg tid, or tolcapone 200 mg tid for 6 months at 20 centers in the United States and Canada. The primary measure of effectiveness was the Activities of Daily Living portion (Subscale II) of the UPDRS. In addition, the change in daily levodopa dose, other subscales of the UPDRS, and the SIP were assessed as secondary measures. The results are displayed in the following table:

Table 3: US/Canadian Non-fluctuator Study

Primary Measure Baseline Change from Baseline at Month 6 p-value*
  Placebo 8.5 0.1
  100 mg tid 7.5 -1.4 < 0.001
  200 mg tid 7.9 -1.6 < 0.001
Secondary Measures Baseline Change from Baseline at Month 6 p-value*
Levodopa Total Daily Dose (mg)
  Placebo 364 47
  100 mg tid 370 -21 < 0.001
  200 mg tid 381 -32 < 0.001
  Placebo 19.7 0.1
  100 mg tid 17.3 -2.0 0.018
  200 mg tid 16.0 -2.3 0.008
SIP (total)
  Placebo 6.9 0.4
  100 mg tid 7.3 -0.9 0.044
  200 mg tid 7.3 -0.7 0.078
Percent of Patients who Developed Fluctuations
  Placebo 26
  100 mg tid 19 0.297
  200 mg tid 14 0.047
*Compared to placebo. Nominal p values are not adjusted for multiple comparisons.

Effects on Activities of Daily Living did not differ by age or sex.

Last reviewed on RxList: 11/28/2016
This monograph has been modified to include the generic and brand name in many instances.

Tasmar - User Reviews

Tasmar User Reviews

Now you can gain knowledge and insight about a drug treatment with Patient Discussions.

Here is a collection of user reviews for the medication Tasmar sorted by most helpful. Patient Discussions FAQs

Report Problems to the Food and Drug Administration


You are encouraged to report negative side effects of prescription drugs to the FDA. Visit the FDA MedWatch website or call 1-800-FDA-1088.

WebMD Daily

Get breaking medical news.