For additional information on Mechanism of Action, Antiviral Activity, Resistance and Cross Resistance, please consult the EMTRIVA and VIREAD prescribing information.
Mechanism of Action
TRUVADA is a fixed-dose combination of antiviral drugs emtricitabine and tenofovir
disoproxil fumarate.
Pharmacokinetics
TRUVADA: One TRUVADA tablet was bioequivalent to one EMTRIVA
capsule (200 mg) plus one VIREAD tablet (300 mg) following single-dose administration
to fasting healthy subjects (N=39).
Emtricitabine: The pharmacokinetic properties of emtricitabine
are summarized in Table 4. Following oral administration of EMTRIVA, emtricitabine
is rapidly absorbed with peak plasma concentrations occurring at 1–2 hours post-dose.
In vitro binding of emtricitabine to human plasma proteins is < 4%
and is independent of concentration over the range of 0.02–200 µg/mL.
Following administration of radiolabelled emtricitabine, approximately 86% is
recovered in the urine and 13% is recovered as metabolites. The metabolites
of emtricitabine include 3'-sulfoxide diastereomers and their glucuronic acid
conjugate. Emtricitabine is eliminated by a combination of glomerular filtration
and active tubular secretion. Following a single oral dose of EMTRIVA, the plasma
emtricitabine half-life is approximately 10 hours.
Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate: The pharmacokinetic properties
of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate are summarized in Table 4. Following oral administration
of VIREAD, maximum tenofovir serum concentrations are achieved in 1.0±0.4 hour.
In vitro binding of tenofovir to human plasma proteins is < 0.7% and
is independent of concentration over the range of 0.01–25 µg/mL. Approximately
70–80% of the intravenous dose of tenofovir is recovered as unchanged drug in
the urine. Tenofovir is eliminated by a combination of glomerular filtration
and active tubular secretion. Following a single oral dose of VIREAD, the terminal
elimination half-life of tenofovir is approximately 17 hours.
Table 4: Single Dose Pharmacokinetic Parameters for Emtricitabine
and Tenofovir in Adultsa
| |
Emtricitabine |
Tenofovir |
| Fasted Oral Bioavailabilityb (%) |
92 (83.1–106.4) |
25 (NC–45.0) |
| Plasma Terminal Elimination Half-Lifeb (hr) |
10 (7.4–18.0) |
17 (12.0–25.7) |
| Cmaxc (µg/mL) |
1.8 ± 0.72d |
0.30 0.09 |
| AUCc (µg· hr/mL) |
10.0 ± 3.12d |
2.29 0.69 |
| CL/Fc (mL/min) |
302 ± 94 |
1043 115 |
| CLrenalc (mL/min) |
213 ± 89 |
243 33 |
a. NC = Not calculated
b.Median (range)
c. Mean (± SD)
d. Data presented as steady state values. |
Effects of Food on Oral Absorption
TRUVADA may be administered with or without food. Administration of TRUVADA
following a high fat meal (784 kcal; 49 grams of fat) or a light meal (373 kcal;
8 grams of fat) delayed the time of tenofovir Cmax by approximately 0.75 hour.
The mean increases in tenofovir AUC and Cmax were approximately 35% and 15%,
respectively, when administered with a high fat or light meal, compared to administration
in the fasted state. In previous safety and efficacy studies, VIREAD (tenofovir)
was taken under fed conditions. Emtricitabine systemic exposures (AUC and Cmax)
were unaffected when TRUVADA was administered with either a high fat or a light
meal.
Special Populations
Race
Emtricitabine: No pharmacokinetic differences due to race have
been identified following the administration of EMTRIVA.
Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate: There were insufficient numbers
from racial and ethnic groups other than Caucasian to adequately determine potential
pharmacokinetic differences among these populations following the administration
of VIREAD.
Gender
Emtricitabine and Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate: Emtricitabine
and tenofovir pharmacokinetics are similar in male and female patients.
Pediatric and Geriatric Patients
Pharmacokinetic studies of tenofovir have not been performed in pediatric patients
( < 18 years). Pharmacokinetics of emtricitabine and tenofovir have not been
fully evaluated in the elderly ( > 65 years).
Patients with Impaired Renal Function
The pharmacokinetics of emtricitabine and tenofovir are altered in patients
with renal impairment [See WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS].
In patients with creatinine clearance < 50 mL/min, Cmax, and AUC0-∞
of emtricitabine and tenofovir were increased. It is recommended that the dosing
interval for TRUVADA be modified in patients with creatinine clearance 30–49
mL/min. TRUVADA should not be used in patients with creatinine clearance <
30 mL/min and in patients with end-stage renal disease requiring dialysis [See
DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION].
Patients with Hepatic Impairment
The pharmacokinetics of tenofovir following a 300 mg dose of VIREAD have been
studied in non-HIV infected patients with moderate to severe hepatic impairment.
There were no substantial alterations in tenofovir pharmacokinetics in patients
with hepatic impairment compared with unimpaired patients. The pharmacokinetics
of TRUVADA or emtricitabine have not been studied in patients with hepatic impairment;
however, emtricitabine is not significantly metabolized by liver enzymes, so
the impact of liver impairment should be limited.
Assessment of Drug Interactions
The steady state pharmacokinetics of emtricitabine and tenofovir were unaffected
when emtricitabine and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate were administered together
versus each agent dosed alone.
In vitro and clinical pharmacokinetic drug-drug interaction studies
have shown that the potential for CYP mediated interactions involving emtricitabine
and tenofovir with other medicinal products is low.
No clinically significant drug interactions have been observed between emtricitabine
and famciclovir, indinavir, stavudine, tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, and zidovudine
(see Tables 5 and 6). Similarly, no clinically significant drug interactions
have been observed between tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and abacavir, efavirenz,
emtricitabine, entecavir, indinavir, lamivudine, lopinavir/ritonavir, methadone,
nelfinavir, oral contraceptives, ribavirin, saquinavir/ritonavir, and tacrolimus
in studies conducted in healthy volunteers (see Tables 7 and 8).
Table 5: Drug Interactions: Changes in Pharmacokinetic Parameters
for Emtricitabine in the Presence of the Coadministered Druga
| Coadministered Drug |
Dose of Coadministered Drug (mg) |
Emtricitabine Dose (mg) |
N |
% Change of Emtricitabine Pharmacokinetic Parametersb
(90%CI) |
| Cmax |
AUC |
Cmin |
| Tenofovir DF |
300 once daily x 7 days |
200 once daily x 7 days |
17 |
⇔ |
⇔ |
↑20
(↑12 to ↑29) |
| Zidovudine |
300 twice daily x 7 days |
200 once daily x 7 days |
27 |
⇔ |
⇔ |
⇔ |
| Indinavir |
800 x 1 |
200 x 1 |
12 |
⇔ |
⇔ |
NA |
| Famciclovir |
500 x 1 |
200 x 1 |
12 |
⇔ |
⇔ |
NA |
| Stavudine |
40 x 1 |
200 x 1 |
6 |
⇔ |
⇔ |
NA |
a. All interaction studies conducted
in healthy volunteers.
b. ↑ = Increase; ↓ = Decrease; ⇔ = No Effect;
NA = Not Applicable |
Table 6: Drug Interactions: Changes in Pharmacokinetic Parameters
for Coadministered Drug in the Presence of Emtricitabinea
| Coadministered Drug |
Dose of Coadministered Drug (mg) |
Emtricitabine Dose (mg) |
N |
% Change of Coadministered Drug Pharmacokinetic Parametersb
(90%CI) |
| Cmax |
AUC |
Cmin |
| Tenofovir DF |
300 once daily x 7 days |
200 once daily x 7 days |
17 |
⇔ |
⇔ |
⇔ |
| Zidovudine |
300 twice daily x 7 days |
200 once daily x 7 days |
27 |
↑17
(↑ 0 to ↑ 38) |
↑ 13
(↑ 5 to ↑20) |
⇔ |
| Indinavir |
800 x 1 |
200 x 1 |
12 |
⇔ |
⇔ |
NA |
| Famciclovir |
500 x 1 |
200 x 1 |
12 |
⇔ |
⇔ |
NA |
| Stavudine |
40 x 1 |
200 x 1 |
6 |
⇔ |
⇔ |
NA |
a. All interaction studies conducted in healthy
volunteers.
b. ↑ = Increase; ↓ = Decrease; ⇔ = No Effect;
NA = Not Applicable |
Table 7: Drug Interactions: Changes in Pharmacokinetic Parameters
for Tenofovira in the Presence of the Coadministered Drug
| Coadministered Drug |
Dose of Coadministered Drug (mg) |
N |
% Change of Tenofovir Pharmacokinetic Parametersb
(90% CI) |
| Cmax |
AUC |
Cmin |
| Abacavir |
300 once |
8 |
⇔ |
⇔ |
NC |
| Atazanavirc |
400 once daily x 14 days |
33 |
↑14
(↑ 8 to ↑ 20) |
↑ 24
(↑21 to ↑ 28) |
↑ 22
(↑ 15 to ↑ 30) |
| Didanosine (enteric-coated) |
400 once |
25 |
⇔ |
⇔ |
⇔ |
| Didanosine (buffered) |
250 or 400 once daily x 7 days |
14 |
⇔ |
⇔ |
⇔ |
| Efavirenz |
600 once daily x 14 days |
29 |
⇔ |
⇔ |
⇔ |
| Emtricitabine |
200 once daily x 7 days |
17 |
⇔ |
⇔ |
⇔ |
| Entecavir |
1 mg once daily x 10 days |
28 |
⇔ |
⇔ |
⇔ |
| Indinavir |
800 three times daily x 7 days |
13 |
↑14
(↑3 to ↑33) |
⇔ |
⇔ |
| Lamivudine |
150 twice daily x 7 days |
15 |
⇔ |
⇔ |
⇔ |
| Lopinavir/Ritonavir |
400/100 twice daily x 14 days |
24 |
⇔ |
↑ 32
(↑ 25 to ↑ 38) |
↑ 51
(↑ 37 to ↑ 66) |
| Nelfinavir |
1250 twice daily x 14 days |
29 |
⇔ |
⇔ |
⇔ |
| Saquinavir/Ritonavir |
1000/100 twice daily x 14 days |
35 |
⇔ |
⇔ |
↑ 23
(↑ 16 to ↑30) |
| Tacrolimus |
0.05 mg/kg twice daily x 7 days |
21 |
↑ 13
(↑ 1 to ↑ 27) |
⇔ |
⇔ |
a. Patients received VIREAD 300 mg once daily.
b. Increase = ↑; Decrease = ↓; No Effect = ⇔;
NC = Not Calculated
c. Reyataz Prescribing Information
|
Table 8: Drug Interactions: Changes in Pharmacokinetic Parameters
for Coadministered Drug in the Presence of Tenofovir
| Coadministered Drug |
Dose of Coadministered Drug (mg) |
N |
% Change of Coadministered Drug Pharmacokinetic Parametersa
(90% CI) |
| Cmax |
AUC |
Cmin |
| Abacavir |
300 once |
8 |
↑12
(↓1 to ↑26) |
⇔ |
NA |
| Atazanavirb |
400 once daily x 14 days |
34 |
↓21
(↓27 to ↓14) |
↓ 25
(↓30 to ↓19) |
↓ 40
(↓48 to ↓ 32) |
| Atazanavirb |
Atazanavir/Ritonavir 300/100 once daily x 42 days |
10 |
↓ 28
(↓ 50 to ↑ 5) |
↓25c
(↓ 42 to ↓ 3) |
↓ 23c
(↓ 46 to ↑10) |
| Efavirenz |
600 once daily x 14 days |
30 |
⇔ |
⇔ |
⇔ |
| Emtricitabine |
200 once daily x 7 days |
17 |
⇔ |
⇔ |
↑20
(↑12 to ↑29) |
| Indinavir |
800 three times daily x 7 days |
12 |
↓ 11
(↓30 to ↑ 12) |
⇔ |
⇔ |
| Entecavir |
1 mg once daily x 10 days |
28 |
⇔ |
↑13
(↑ 11 to ↑15) |
⇔ |
| Lamivudine |
150 twice daily x 7 days |
15 |
↓24
(↓34 to ↓12) |
⇔ |
⇔ |
| Lopinavir Ritonavir |
Lopinavir/Ritonavir 400/100 twice daily x 14
days |
24 |
⇔ |
⇔ |
⇔ |
| ⇔ |
⇔ |
⇔ |
| Methadoned |
40-110 once daily x 14 dayse |
13 |
⇔ |
⇔ |
⇔ |
| Nelfinavir M8 metabolite |
1250 twice daily x 14 days |
29 |
⇔ |
⇔ |
⇔ |
| ⇔ |
⇔ |
⇔ |
| Oral Contraceptivesf |
Ethinyl Estradiol/ Norgestimate (Ortho-Tricyclen) Once
daily x 7 days |
20 |
⇔ |
⇔ |
⇔ |
| Ribavirin |
600 once |
22 |
⇔ |
⇔ |
NA |
Saquinavir
Ritonavir |
Saquinavir/Ritonavir 1000/100 twice daily x
14 days |
32 |
↑ 22
(↑ 6 to ↑41) |
↑29g
(↑12 to ↑ 48) |
↑ 47g
(↑ 23 to ↑ 76) |
| ⇔ |
⇔ |
↑23
(↑ 3 to ↑46) |
| Tacrolimus |
0.05 mg/kg twice daily x 7 days |
21 |
⇔ |
⇔ |
⇔ |
a. Increase = ↑;
Decrease = ↓; No Effect = ⇔; NA = Not Applicable
b. Reyataz Prescribing Information
c. In HIV-infected patients, addition of tenofovir DF to atazanavir
300 mg plus ritonavir 100 mg, resulted in AUC and Cmin values of atazanavir
that were 2.3 and 4-fold higher than the respective values observed for
atazanavir 400 mg when given alone.
d. R-(active), S- and total methadone exposures were equivalent
when dosed alone or with VIREAD.
e. Individual subjects were maintained on their stable methadone
dose. No pharmacodynamic alterations (opiate toxicity or withdrawal signs
or symptoms) were reported.
f. Ethinyl estradiol and 17-deacetyl norgestimate (pharmacologically
active metabolite) exposures were equivalent when dosed alone or with VIREAD.
g. Increases in AUC and Cmin are not expected to be clinically
relevant; hence no dose adjustments are required when tenofovir DF and ritonavir-boosted
saquinavir are coadministered. |
Following multiple dosing to HIV-negative subjects receiving either chronic
methadone maintenance therapy or oral contraceptives, or single doses of ribavirin,
steady state tenofovir pharmacokinetics were similar to those observed in previous
studies, indicating lack of clinically significant drug interactions between
these agents and VIREAD.
Coadministration of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate with didanosine results in
changes in the pharmacokinetics of didanosine that may be of clinical significance.
Table 9 summarizes the effects of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate on the pharmacokinetics
of didanosine. Concomitant dosing of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate with didanosine
buffered tablets or enteric-coated capsules significantly increases the Cmax
and AUC of didanosine. When didanosine 250 mg enteric-coated capsules were administered
with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, systemic exposures of didanosine were similar
to those seen with the 400 mg enteric-coated capsules alone under fasted conditions.
The mechanism of this interaction is unknown. See DRUG INTERACTIONS regarding
use of didanosine with VIREAD.
Table 9: Drug Interactions: Pharmacokinetic Parameters for
Didanosine in the Presence of VIREAD
| Didanosinea Dose (mg)/Method
of Administrationa |
VIREAD Method of Administrationa |
N |
% Difference (90% CI) vs. Didanosine 400 mg Alone, Fastedb |
| Cmax |
AUC |
| Buffered tablets |
| 400 once dailyc x 7 days |
Fasted 1 hour after didanosine |
14 |
↑28
(↑11 to ↑ 48) |
↑ 44
(↑31 to ↑ 59) |
| Enteric coated capsules |
| 400 once, fasted |
With food, 2 hours after didanosine |
26 |
↑48
(↑25 to ↑76) |
↑ 48
(↑ 31 to ↑ 67) |
| 400 once, with food |
Simultaneously with didanosine |
26 |
↑64
(↑ 41 to ↑89) |
↑ 60
(↑ 44 to ↑ 79) |
| 250 once, fasted |
With food, 2 hours after didanosine |
28 |
↓10
(↓ 22 to ↑3) |
⇔ |
| 250 once, fasted |
Simultaneously with didanosine |
28 |
⇔ |
↑ 14
(0 to ↑ 31) |
| 250 once, with food |
Simultaneously with didanosine |
28 |
↓ 29
(↓ 39 to ↓18) |
↓11
(↓ 23 to ↑2) |
a. Administration with food was with a light meal
(~373 kcal, 20% fat).
b. Increase = ↑; Decrease = ↓; No Effect = ⇔
c. Includes 4 subjects weighing < 60 kg receiving ddI 250 mg.
|
Microbiology
Mechanism of Action
Emtricitabine: Emtricitabine, a synthetic nucleoside analog of
cytidine, is phosphorylated by cellular enzymes to form emtricitabine 5'-triphosphate.
Emtricitabine 5'-triphosphate inhibits the activity of the HIV-1 reverse transcriptase
(RT) by competing with the natural substrate deoxycytidine 5'-triphosphate and
by being incorporated into nascent viral DNA which results in chain termination.
Emtricitabine 5'-triphosphate is a weak inhibitor of mammalian DNA polymerase
α, β, ε and mitochondrial DNA polymerase γ.
Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate: Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate
is an acyclic nucleoside phosphonate diester analog of adenosine monophosphate.
Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate requires initial diester hydrolysis for conversion
to tenofovir and subsequent phosphorylations by cellular enzymes to form tenofovir
diphosphate. Tenofovir diphosphate inhibits the activity of HIV-1 RT by competing
with the natural substrate deoxyadenosine 5'-triphosphate and, after incorporation
into DNA, by DNA chain termination. Tenofovir diphosphate is a weak inhibitor
of mammalian DNA polymerases α, β, and mitochondrial DNA polymerase
γ.
Antiviral Activity
Emtricitabine and Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate: In combination
studies evaluating the cell culture antiviral activity of emtricitabine and
tenofovir together, synergistic antiviral effects were observed.
Emtricitabine: The antiviral activity of emtricitabine against
laboratory and clinical isolates of HIV-1 was assessed in lymphoblastoid cell
lines, the MAGI-CCR5 cell line, and peripheral blood mononuclear cells. The
50% effective concentration (EC50) values for emtricitabine were
in the range of 0.0013–0.64 µM (0.0003–0.158 µg/mL). In drug combination
studies of emtricitabine with nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (abacavir,
lamivudine, stavudine, zalcitabine, zidovudine), non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase
inhibitors (delavirdine, efavirenz, nevirapine), and protease inhibitors (amprenavir,
nelfinavir, ritonavir, saquinavir), additive to synergistic effects were observed.
Emtricitabine displayed antiviral activity in cell culture against HIV-1 clades
A, B, C, D, E, F, and G (EC50 values ranged from 0.007–0.075 µM)
and showed strain specific activity against HIV-2 (EC50 values ranged
from 0.007–1.5 µM).
Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate: The antiviral activity of tenofovir
against laboratory and clinical isolates of HIV-1 was assessed in lymphoblastoid
cell lines, primary monocyte/macrophage cells and peripheral blood lymphocytes.
The EC50 values for tenofovir were in the range of 0.04–8.5 µM.
In drug combination studies of tenofovir with nucleoside reverse transcriptase
inhibitors (abacavir, didanosine, lamivudine, stavudine, zalcitabine, zidovudine),
non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (delavirdine, efavirenz, nevirapine),
and protease inhibitors (amprenavir, indinavir, nelfinavir, ritonavir, saquinavir),
additive to synergistic effects were observed. Tenofovir displayed antiviral
activity in cell culture against HIV-1 clades A, B, C, D, E, F, G and O (EC50
values ranged from 0.5–2.2 µM) and showed strain specific activity against
HIV-2 (EC50 values ranged from 1.6 M to 5.5 µM).
Resistance
Emtricitabine and Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate: HIV-1 isolates
with reduced susceptibility to the combination of emtricitabine and tenofovir
have been selected in cell culture. Genotypic analysis of these isolates identified
the M184V/I and/or K65R amino acid substitutions in the viral RT.
In a clinical study of treatment-naïve patients[Study 934, see Clinical
Studies], resistance analysis was performed on HIV-1 isolates from all confirmed
virologic failure patients with > 400 copies/mL of HIV-1 RNA at Week 144 or
early discontinuation. Development of efavirenz resistance-associated substitutions
occurred most frequently and was similar between the treatment arms. The M184V
amino acid substitution, associated with resistance to EMTRIVA and lamivudine,
was observed in 2/19 analyzed patient isolates in the EMTRIVA + VIREAD group
and in 10/29 analyzed patient isolates in the zidovudine/lamivudine group. Through
144 weeks of Study 934, no patients have developed a detectable K65R substitution
in their HIV-1 as analyzed through standard genotypic analysis.
Emtricitabine: Emtricitabine-resistant isolates of HIV-1 have
been selected in cell culture and in vivo. Genotypic analysis of these
isolates showed that the reduced susceptibility to emtricitabine was associated
with a substitution in the HIV-1 RT gene at codon 184 which resulted in an amino
acid substitution of methionine by valine or isoleucine (M184V/I).
Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate: HIV-1 isolates with reduced susceptibility
to tenofovir have been selected in cell culture. These viruses expressed a K65R
substitution in RT and showed a 2–4 fold reduction in susceptibility to tenofovir.
In treatment-naïve patients, isolates from 8/47 (17%) analyzed patients
developed the K65R substitution in the VIREAD arm through 144 weeks; 7 occurred
in the first 48 weeks of treatment and 1 at Week 96. In treatment-experienced
patients, 14/304 (5%) isolates from patients failing VIREAD through Week 96
showed > 1.4 fold (median 2.7) reduced susceptibility to tenofovir. Genotypic
analysis of the resistant isolates showed a substitution in the HIV-1 RT gene
resulting in the K65R amino acid substitution.
Cross Resistance
Emtricitabine and Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate: Cross-resistance
among certain nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) has been recognized.
The M184V/I and/or K65R substitutions selected in cell culture by the combination
of emtricitabine and tenofovir are also observed in some HIV-1 isolates from
subjects failing treatment with tenofovir in combination with either lamivudine
or emtricitabine, and either abacavir or didanosine. Therefore, cross-resistance
among these drugs may occur in patients whose virus harbors either or both of
these amino acid substitutions.
Emtricitabine: Emtricitabine-resistant isolates (M184V/I) were
cross-resistant to lamivudine and zalcitabine but retained susceptibility in
cell culture to didanosine, stavudine, tenofovir, zidovudine, and NNRTIs (delavirdine,
efavirenz, and nevirapine). HIV-1 isolates containing the K65R substitution,
selected in vivo by abacavir, didanosine, tenofovir, and zalcitabine,
demonstrated reduced susceptibility to inhibition by emtricitabine. Viruses
harboring substitutions conferring reduced susceptibility to stavudine and zidovudine
(M41L, D67N, K70R, L210W, T215Y/F, K219Q/E), or didanosine (L74V) remained sensitive
to emtricitabine. HIV-1 containing the K103N substitution associated with resistance
to NNRTIs was susceptible to emtricitabine.
Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate: HIV-1 isolates from patients (N=20)
whose HIV-1 expressed a mean of 3 zidovudine-associated RT amino acid substitutions
(M41L, D67N, K70R, L210W, T215Y/F, or K219Q/E/N) showed a 3.1-fold decrease
in the susceptibility to tenofovir. Multinucleoside resistant HIV-1 with a T69S
double insertion substitution in the RT showed reduced susceptibility to tenofovir.
Animal Toxicology and/or Pharmacology
Tenofovir and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate administered in toxicology studies
to rats, dogs and monkeys at exposures (based on AUCs) greater than or equal
to 6-fold those observed in humans caused bone toxicity. In monkeys the bone
toxicity was diagnosed as osteomalacia. Osteomalacia observed in monkeys appeared
to be reversible upon dose reduction or discontinuation of tenofovir. In rats
and dogs, the bone toxicity manifested as reduced bone mineral density. The
mechanism(s) underlying bone toxicity is unknown.
Evidence of renal toxicity was noted in 4 animal species. Increases in serum
creatinine, BUN, glycosuria, proteinuria, phosphaturia, and/or calciuria and
decreases in serum phosphate were observed to varying degrees in these animals.
These toxicities were noted at exposures (based on AUCs) 2–20 times higher than
those observed in humans. The relationship of the renal abnormalities, particularly
the phosphaturia, to the bone toxicity is not known.
Clinical Studies
Clinical Study 934 supports the use of TRUVADA tablets for the treatment of
HIV-1 infection. Additional data in support of the use of TRUVADA are derived
from Study 903, in which lamivudine and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (tenofovir
DF) were used in combination in treatment-naïve adults, and clinical Study
303 in which emtricitabine and lamivudine demonstrated comparable efficacy,
safety and resistance patterns as part of multidrug regimens. For additional
information about these studies, please consult the prescribing information
for tenofovir DF and emtricitabine.
Study 934
Data through 144 weeks are reported for Study 934, a randomized, open-label,
active-controlled multicenter study comparing emtricitabine + tenofovir DF administered
in combination with efavirenz versus zidovudine/lamivudine fixed-dose combination
administered in combination with efavirenz in 511 antiretroviral-naïve
patients. From Weeks 96 to 144 of the study, patients received TRUVADA with
efavirenz in place of emtricitabine + tenofovir DF with efavirenz. Patients
had a mean age of 38 years (range 18–80), 86% were male, 59% were Caucasian
and 23% were Black. The mean baseline CD4+ cell count was 245 cells/mm3
(range 2–1191) and median baseline plasma HIV-1 RNA was 5.01 log10
copies/mL (range 3.56–6.54). Patients were stratified by baseline CD4+
cell count ( < or ≥ 200 cells/mm3); 41% had CD4+ cell
counts < 200 cells/mm3 and 51% of patients had baseline viral loads
> 100,000 copies/mL. Treatment outcomes through 48 and 144 weeks for those
patients who did not have efavirenz resistance at baseline are presented in
Table 10.
Table 10: Outcomes of Randomized Treatment at Week 48 and
144 (Study 934)
| Outcomes |
At Week 48 |
At Week 144 |
FTC + TDF + EFV
(N=244) |
AZT/3TC+ EFV
(N=243) |
FTC + TDF + EFV (N=227)a |
AZT/3TC + EFV (N=229)a |
| Responderb |
84% |
73% |
71% |
58% |
| Virologic failurec |
2% |
4% |
3% |
6% |
| Rebound |
1% |
3% |
2% |
5% |
| Never suppressed |
0% |
0% |
0% |
0% |
| Change in antiretroviral regimen |
1% |
1% |
1% |
1% |
| Death |
< 1% |
1% |
1% |
1% |
| Discontinued due to adverse event |
4% |
9% |
5% |
12% |
| Discontinued for other reasonsd |
10% |
14% |
20% |
22% |
a. Patients who were responders at Week 48 or Week
96 (HIV-1 RNA < 400 copies/mL) but did not consent to continue study after
Week 48 or Week 96 were excluded from analysis.
b. Patients achieved and maintained confirmed HIV-1 RNA < 400
copies/mL through Weeks 48 and 144.
c. Includes confirmed viral rebound and failure to achieve confirmed
< 400 copies/mL through Weeks 48 and 144.
d. Includes lost to follow-up, patient withdrawal, noncompliance,
protocol violation and other reasons. |
Through Week 48, 84% and 73% of patients in the emtricitabine + tenofovir DF
group and the zidovudine/lamivudine group, respectively, achieved and maintained
HIV-1 RNA < 400 copies/mL (71% and 58% through Week 144). The difference in
the proportion of patients who achieved and maintained HIV-1 RNA < 400 copies/mL
through 48 weeks largely results from the higher number of discontinuations
due to adverse events and other reasons in the zidovudine/lamivudine group in
this open-label study. In addition, 80% and 70% of patients in the emtricitabine
+ tenofovir DF group and the zidovudine/lamivudine group, respectively, achieved
and maintained HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL through Week 48 (64% and 56% through
Week 144). The mean increase from baseline in CD4+ cell count was
190 cells/mm3 in the emtricitabine + tenofovir DF group and 158 cells/mm3
in the zidovudine/lamivudine group at Week 48 (312 and 271 cells/mm3
at Week 144).
Through 48 weeks, 7 patients in the emtricitabine + tenofovir DF group and
5 patients in the zidovudine/lamivudine group experienced a new CDC Class C
event (10 and 6 patients through 144 weeks).
Last updated on RxList: 12/29/2008