Pharmacologic Classification
a. General
Acetaminophen is an analgesic and antipyretic agent and has been clinically proven to be effective for the temporary relief of minor aches and pains associated with the common cold, headache, toothache, muscular aches, backache, for the minor pain of arthritis, for the pain of menstrual cramps, and for the reduction of fever. Acetaminophen is an effective antipyretic in infants, children, and adults.
b. Pharmacologic Class
Acetaminophen is a centrally acting analgesic and antipyretic agent.
c. Mechanism of Action
Analgesia
Although the exact site and mechanism of analgesic action is not clearly defined,
acetaminophen appears to produce analgesia by elevation of the pain threshold.2-4
The potential mechanism may involve inhibition of the nitric oxide pathway mediated
by a variety of neurotransmitter receptors including N-methyl-D-aspartate and
substance P.5
Antipyresis
Investigations indicate that endogenous pyrogens produced by leukocytes cause
an elevation of prostaglandin E (PGE) in the cerebrospinal fluid. Fever results
when the elevated PGE acts on the preoptic area of the anterior hypothalamus
to decrease heat loss and increase heat gain. Acetaminophen has been shown to
inhibit the action of endogenous pyrogens on the heat-regulating centers in
the brain by blocking the formation and release of prostaglandins in the central
nervous system.6-9 Inhibition of arachidonic acid metabolism is not
requisite for the antipyretic effect of acetaminophen.10 Acetaminophen
does not depend upon the activation of the arginine vasopressin V-1 receptor
to induce antipyresis as has been noted in rats treated with indomethacin and
salicylates.11,12 This has been demonstrated in animals by observing
a decrease in both fever and PGE activity following administration of acetaminophen
to unanesthetized cats, and in rabbits and dogs when brain prostaglandin synthetase
was inhibited by the administration of acetaminophen.13,14
d. Pharmacokinetic Data
Absorption
Regular-Release
Oral acetaminophen is rapidly and almost completely absorbed from the gastrointestinal
tract primarily in the small intestine. This absorption process occurs by passive
transport. The relative bioavailability ranges from 85% to 98%.15
Figure 1 shows the mean pharmacokinetic profile for 24 fasting subjects who received acetaminophen 1000 mg dosed as liquid or caplets. For individual subjects, maximal plasma concentrations occurred within 10 to 90 minutes following ingestion and ranged from 8 to 32 µg/mL. Acetaminophen plasma concentrations range from 1 to 4 µg/mL 6 hours after ingestion.
Extended-Release
Each bilayered acetaminophen extended-release, 650-mg caplet contains 325 mg
of immediate-release acetaminophen on one side and, on the other side, 325 mg
of acetaminophen in a matrix formulation designed to slowly release. In vitro
data indicate that two 650-mg extended-release caplets
FIGURE 1. Mean plasma concentrations of acetaminophen in
24 male subjects following oral administration of 1000 mg of acetaminophen dosed
as either 30 mL of Extra Strength TYLENOL® acetaminophen Adult Liquid Pain
Reliever or as two Extra Strength TYLENOL® acetaminophen Caplets.
FIGURE 2. Mean plasma concentrations of acetaminophen in
24 male subjects following oral administration of 1300 mg acetaminophen dosed
as either two caplets of TYLENOL® Arthritis Extended Relief or four Regular
Strength TYLENOL® acetaminophen (two caplets given at 0 and 4 hours).
(containing a total of 1300 mg of acetaminophen) release 88% and 95% of the
drug within 3 and 5 hours, respectively.16 Following administration
of a single dose of two 650-mg, extended-release caplets, the average maximal
plasma concentrations occurred within 0.5 to 3 hours following ingestion and
ranged from 6.9 to 14.1 µg/mL. Figure 2 shows the mean pharmacokinetic profile
for 24 fasting subjects who received acetaminophen 1300 mg dosed as two extended-release
or four regular-strength caplets (two caplets given at 0 and 4 hours).
Distribution
Acetaminophen appears to be widely distributed throughout most body fluids
except fat. The apparent volume of distribution of acetaminophen is 0.95 L/kg.17
A relatively small proportion (10% to 25%) of acetaminophen is bound to plasma proteins and binding is only slightly increased in plasma concentrations associated
with overdose.18,19 The sulfate and glucuronide metabolites do not
bind to plasma proteins even at relatively high concentrations.20
Spinal Fluid
Low protein binding and low molecular weight allow acetaminophen to pass through
the blood-brain barrier. The peak concentration of acetaminophen in cerebrospinal
fluid is reached after 2 to 3 hours.21,22
Placental Barrier
Analysis of urine samples has demonstrated the passage of unconjugated acetaminophen
via placental transfer.23 When given to the mother in therapeutic
doses, acetaminophen crosses the placenta into fetal circulation as early as
30 minutes after ingestion, although the difference in serum concentration between maternal and cord blood is not statistically significant.24 In the
fetus, acetaminophen is effectively metabolized by sulfate conjugation.25
Breast Milk
Maternal ingestion of acetaminophen in recommended analgesic doses does not
present a risk to the nursing infant. Amounts in milk range from 0.1% to 1.85%
of the ingested maternal dose.26-28 These studies have established
that, even at the time of peak acetaminophen concentration in human breast milk,
the nursing infant would receive less than 2% of the maternal dose. Accordingly,
breast feeding need not be interrupted because of maternal ingestion of recommended
doses of acetaminophen.
Metabolism
Acetaminophen is primarily metabolized in the liver by first-order kinetics and involves three principal separate pathways:
a) conjugation with glucuronide
b) conjugation with sulfate
c) oxidation via the cytochrome, P450-dependent, mixed-function oxidative enzyme
pathway to form a reactive intermediate metabolite, which conjugates with glutathione
and is then further metabolized to form cysteine and mercapturic acid conjugates.29
The principal cytochrome P450 isoenzyme involved appears to be CYP2E1, with
CYP1A2 and CYP3A4 as additional pathways.30-32
Two additional minor pathways also are possibly involved in acetaminophen metabolism:33
a) hydroxylation to form 3-hydroxy-acetaminophen
b) methoxylation to form 3-methoxy-acetaminophen.
These metabolites are further conjugated with glucuronide or sulfate.
In adults, the majority of acetaminophen is conjugated with glucuronic acid
and, to a lesser extent, with sulfate. These glucuronide-, sulfate-, and glutathione-derived
metabolites lack biologic activity.8 In premature infants, newborns,
and young infants, the sulfate conjugate predominates.23,34
Excretion
The biologic half-life of acetaminophen in normal adults is approximately 2
to 3 hours in the usual dosage range.21,35 It is somewhat shorter
in children and somewhat longer in neonates and in patients with cirrhosis.18
The elimination half-life is approximately 3 hours for the extended-release
product. The elimination half-life of acetaminophen in the cerebrospinal fluid
according to pooled data is 3.2 hours.21
Acetaminophen is eliminated from the body primarily by formation of glucuronide
and sulfate conjugates in a dose-dependent manner. Table 1 0n the following
page shows the mean range of acetaminophen urinary metabolite values in healthy
subjects using therapeutic doses (10 mg/kg or 1000-mg dose).36-40
Less than 9% of acetaminophen is excreted unchanged in the urine.37
TABLE 1. Acetaminophen metabolites found in urine
Acetaminophen
metabolite |
Range of mean
percent |
| Glucuronide |
46.8 - 62.2 |
| Sulfate |
25.4 - 35.9 |
| Mercapturate |
2.7 - 5.0 |
| Cysteine conjugate |
2.1 - 3.0 |
| Free acetaminophen |
3.4 - 8.7 |
TABLE 2. Adult TYLENOL® acetaminophen preparations
| Preparation |
Strength |
Adult single dose |
Frequencya |
| Regular Strength TYLENOL |
|
|
|
| Tablets/Caplets |
325 mg |
650 mg |
Every 4 to 6 hb |
| Extra Strength TYLENOL |
|
|
|
| Tablets/Caplets/Gelcaps/Geltabs |
500 mg |
1000 mg |
Every 4 to 6 hc,d |
| Adult Liquid |
500 mg/15 mL |
1000 mg |
Every 4 to 6 hd,e |
| TYLENOL Arthritis Extended Relief Caplets |
650 mg |
1300 mg |
Every 8 hd,f |
a Not to exceed 4000 mg in any 24-hour period.
b Not to exceed 12 tablets per day.
c Not to exceed 8 tablets per day
d Not for use in children under 12 years of age.
e Not to exceed 8 tablespoons per day.
f Not to exceed 6 caplets per day. |
TABLE 3. Pediatric TYLENOL® acetaminophen preparations
| Preparation |
Strengtha |
| Infants'TYLENOL Concentrated Drops |
80 mg/0.8 mL |
| Children's TYLENOL Elixir |
160 mg/5 mL |
| Children's TYLENOL Suspension Liquid |
160 mg/5 mL |
| Children's TYLENOL Chewable Tablets |
80 mg |
| Junior Strength TYLENOL Chewable Tablets |
160 mg |
| Junior Strength TYLENOL Caplets |
160 mg |
| a Dosing to be based on age or weight (approximately
10-15 mg/kg/dose; not to exceed 5 doses in 24 hours). |
Other minor metabolites, each accounting for 4% or less of a therapeutic dose,
include sulfate and glucuronide conjugates of 3-methoxy-acetaminophen, 3-hydroxy-acetaminophen,
and 3-methyl-thioacetaminophen.39,41-43 Slight differences have been
seen in ethnically distinct populations (eg, Asian, Spanish).36,44-46
Clinical Studies: Therapeutic Comparisons With Other Drugs Or Treatments
a. Antipyresis
In controlled trials, acetaminophen was shown to be superior to placebo.53-56
Tepid sponging and acetaminophen have been shown to be approximately equivalent
for the initial 30 minutes of treatment, after which acetaminophen is superior.
The combination of acetaminophen and sponging may provide additive benefit,
but at the expense of additional discomfort to the child.54,56. There
is no significant difference in antipyresis between equivalent doses of aspirin
and acetaminophen. 51,52,57,58 Comparative clinical studies of the
antipyretic efficacy of acetaminophen and ibuprofen administered in recommended
dosages to pediatric patients suggest that both drugs are effective.59-62
However, results vary depending on the dosage of each agent administered. Acetaminophen
at a dose of 15 mg/kg is equivalent to ibuprofen at a dose of 10 mg/kg.60
Acetaminophen 10 mg/kg or 12.5 mg/kg does not produce the same degree of antipyresis
as ibuprofen 7.5 mg/kg or 10 mg/kg.59,61,62 Acetaminophen 12.5 mg/kg
is superior to ibuprofen 5 mg/kg.63 In these studies, onset of antipyresis
with acetaminophen generally occurred within 30 to 60 minutes following administration
and peak antipyresis was noted at 2 to 3 hours.
b. Analgesia
Acetaminophen is effective in the treatment of various disorders associated with pain of mild to moderate intensity. Studies have been performed in a variety of pain models to assess the overall efficacy of acetaminophen. Clinical research has substantiated efficacy in pain associated with the following conditions:
Arthritis Pain
At recommended dosages, acetaminophen is well tolerated and effective for the
treatment of minor pain of arthritis. Clinical studies have compared the efficacy
of acetaminophen to placebo, ibuprofen, and naproxen in patients with osteoarthritis
of the knee.48-50 In a double-blind, placebo-controlled study, Amadio
and Cummings48 found that 1000 mg of acetaminophen administered four
times daily was significantly more effective than placebo in relieving tenderness,
pain at rest, and pain on motion. In a randomized, double-blind study comparing
acetaminophen (4000 mg/d) with analgesic (1200 mg/d) and anti-inflammatory (2400
mg/d) doses of ibuprofen, Bradley and colleagues49 reported that acetaminophen
was comparable to both doses of ibuprofen in relieving pain. In a double-blind
study lasting up to 2 years that compared the relative safety and efficacy of
acetaminophen (2600 mg/d) to naproxen (750 mg/d), Williams and associates50
noted that acetaminophen was similar to naproxen in improving pain on motion
and in physicians' global assessment of disease activity.
Acetaminophen taken for 1 month to 2 years is beneficial in relieving osteoarthritic
pain and causes no significant adverse effects. American College of Rheumatology*
Guidelines for the Medical Management of Osteoarthritis, published in 1995,
recommend acetaminophen in doses up to 4000 mg daily as the preferred first-line
therapy in patients with symptomatic osteoarthritis of the knee.64
Headache
Three randomized, multicenter, double-blind, single-dose, placebo-controlled studies have been conducted by McNeil (unpublished), which evaluated the efficacy of acetaminophen in the tension headache model. In the first study, patients were treated with acetaminophen 1000 mg, ibuprofen 200 mg, ibuprofen 400 mg, or placebo. The active treatments were more effective than placebo, and neither strength of ibuprofen was different from acetaminophen; however, ibuprofen 400 mg was significantly more effective than ibuprofen 200 mg in patients' overall evaluation. The second study compared the efficacy of acetaminophen 1000 mg, naproxen 375 mg, and placebo. Acetaminophen and naproxen were rated significantly higher than placebo but were not different from each other. The third study evaluated acetaminophen 1000 mg, naproxen sodium 440 mg, and placebo. Both active treatments were significantly better than placebo. Naproxen sodium was significantly more effective than acetaminophen for patients with baseline pain of moderate severity. However, comparisons of patients with severe baseline pain were not significantly different between the active treatment groups.
Post-Oral Surgery Pain
Several dose-ranging studies have assessed the efficacy of acetaminophen in post-oral surgery pain.
Two double-blind, single-dose studies (unpublished) evaluated patients who
had undergone oral surgery and were experiencing moderate to severe pain. In
these studies, acetaminophen 650 mg and 1000 mg was superior to placebo in all
summary measures for moderate pain. For more severe pain, acetaminophen 1000
mg was superior to acetaminophen 650 mg. In two randomized studies, acetaminophen
2000 mg did not provide greater analgesia compared with acetaminophen 1000 mg.65,66
Three studies (unpublished) compared the relative analgesic efficacy of acetaminophen, aspirin, and placebo in patients experiencing pain following dental surgery. Two double-blind, single-dose studies demonstrated that acetaminophen 975 mg and 1000 mg were significantly better than aspirin 650 mg in relieving pain. In a third study, acetaminophen 1000 mg and aspirin 1000 mg were significantly more effective than placebo but were not different from each other.
Several studies have compared the analgesic efficacy of acetaminophen and ibuprofen
following dental surgery. Most studies showed that both active treatments were
effective compared with placebo, but in some studies ibuprofen 400 mg provided
greater pain relief than acetaminophen 1000 mg in patients with moderate to
severe baseline pain.67,68
In another study, patients were randomized to receive 500 mg of diflunisal
or 1000 mg of acetaminophen prior to oral surgery. Both treatments were effective
and the difference in mean overall pain scores between the two regimens was
not significantly different.69
Quiding and colleagues70 evaluated the analgesic efficacy of a two-dose regimen of codeine 60 mg compared with acetaminophen 1000 mg in patients undergoing
surgical removal of a third molar tooth. Acetaminophen 500 mg was used as the
control. After two doses, acetaminophen 1000 mg was superior to acetaminophen
500 mg, and the efficacy of codeine 60 mg corresponded approximately to acetaminophen
500 mg.
Two randomized, double-blind studies (unpublished) evaluated the onset of analgesia
using acetaminophen 1000 mg, naproxen sodium 220 mg and 440 mg, and placebo
in patients who experienced moderate to severe postoperative dental pain. The
first study found that all active treatments were more effective than placebo,
and no difference for onset of pain relief between the active treatments was
observed. The second study demonstrated that all active treatments had shorter
time to onset of pain relief and were more effective than placebo.
Episiotomy Pain
Postpartum patients receiving a single 600-mg dose of acetaminophen reported
a degree of relief greater than with either salicylamide or placebo and equivalent
to the same dose of aspirin.71 Kantor and associates72
compared the effects of single doses of acetaminophen 600 mg and aspirin 600
mg or 1200 mg in postpartum patients. The three active treatments were significantly
superior to placebo. In a double-blind evaluation comparing acetaminophen, propoxyphene,
propoxyphene/acetamino-phen combination, and placebo, acetaminophen alone was
comparable to the propoxyphene combination and superior to both propoxyphene
alone and placebo.73 The analgesic efficacies of acetaminophen 650
mg, ibuprofen 200 mg, and placebo were evaluated in a randomized, double-blind
study (unpublished) involving hospitalized postpartum patients with moderate
to severe pain due to episiotomies. Both active treatments were superior to
placebo, whereas ibuprofen was significantly better than acetaminophen.
Orthopedic Surgery
McQuay and colleagues74,75 performed two studies comparing the analgesic
equivalence and efficacy of varying doses of ketorolac, bromfenac, and acetaminophen
in patients who had elective orthopedic surgery. In the first study, patients
were treated with placebo plus one of the following: acetaminophen 500 mg, acetaminophen
1000 mg, ketorolac 5 mg, ketorolac 10 mg, or ketorolac 20 mg. Acetaminophen
1000 mg was significantly superior to acetaminophen 500 mg. Ketorolac 20 mg
was superior to acetaminophen 500 mg and ketorolac 5 mg and 10 mg but was not
superior to acetaminophen 1000 mg.75 In the second study, patients
were randomized to receive placebo, acetaminophen 1000 mg, bromfenac 5 mg, bromfenac
10 mg, or bromfenac 25 mg. In terms of analgesic efficacy, bromfenac 10 mg was
similar to acetaminophen 1000 mg.74
Menstrual Pain/Dysmenorrhea
A randomized crossover study (unpublished) in primary dysmenorrhea compared
the effect of acetaminophen 1000 mg four times daily, ibuprofen 400 mg three
times daily, and placebo in patients with a history of recurrent moderate to
severe dysmenorrhea. The two active drugs were comparable in the treatment of
primary symptoms of dysmenorrhea, and both were superior to placebo.
Post-Immunization Muscle Aches and Pain
Aoki and associates76 evaluated the effect of acetaminophen on the
incidence of adverse effects and immunogenicity of whole-virus influenza vaccine
in healthcare workers. Hospital personnel volunteers were randomly assigned
to acetaminophen 325 mg, acetaminophen 650 mg, or placebo. Capsules were taken
at the time of the vaccination, and 4, 8, and 12 hours after vaccination. Acetaminophen
650 mg significantly reduced the incidence of sore arm and nausea without affecting
antibody response.
Cancer Pain
Wallenstein and Houde77 found 600 mg of acetaminophen or aspirin
to be approximately equivalent and significantly superior to salicylamide and
placebo for pain relief in patients with cancer. Moertel and colleagues78
compared acetaminophen 650 mg, codeine 65 mg, aspirin 650 mg, pentazocine 50
mg, propoxyphene 65 mg, and ethoheptazine 75 mg in the treatment of cancer pain.
On the basis of mean pain relief scores, neither propoxyphene nor ethoheptazine
was statistically superior to placebo. Acetaminophen was superior to placebo
and comparable to codeine, aspirin, and pentazocine for pain relief.
Sore Throat
The analgesic efficacy of acetaminophen also has been demonstrated in pain
associated with tonsillectomy, tonsillitis, and sore throat.79-81
Toxicology
A number of acute, subacute, and chronic toxicity studies in animals show that
the toxic effects of acetaminophen appear only at extremely high doses.
Acute Toxicity (Multiple Animal Models)
See Table 5.
Subacute Toxicity (Rats)
Oral doses of up to 1000 mg/kg/d or intramuscular doses of up to 100 mg/kg/d
were given to rats for 13 days or 30 days, respectively. No drug-related changes
were seen in mortality rate or necropsy findings compared with controls.
Subacute Toxicity (Dogs)
After acetaminophen (20 and 63 mg/kg/d) was given intramuscularly for 4 weeks
to dogs, mortality rate, laboratory determinations, and gross necropsy observations
were not significantly different from control values. Slight thyroid hyperplasia
was seen on histopathologic examinations in the six high-dose dogs, slight renal
tubular cell cloudy swelling was noted in three high-dose and one low-dose dog,
and slight liver glycogen depletion was found in one control, three high-dose,
and two low-dose animals.156
Chronic Toxicity (Rats)
Acetaminophen, 200 mg/kg/d, given to rats once a day by gavage for 28 weeks
produced no changes in weight gain, gross pathology, or histologic findings
in liver, kidney, heart, or lungs.157 Acetaminophen incorporated
into the diet of rats for 100 days showed that the minimum dose that caused
death in all rats was 1060 mg/kg/d, the dose that caused death in 50% of rats
was 765 mg/kg/d, and the maximum dose that caused no deaths was 413 mg/kg/d.
At or near the LD50 (100 days), histologic findings included areas
of hepatic necrosis, some renal tubular degeneration, and testicular atrophy.158
TABLE 5. Acute toxicity (LD50 mg/kg) of acetaminophen
| Species |
Oral |
Intramuscular |
Subcutaneous |
| Rat (1 day old) |
NT |
NT |
> 600, < 700 |
| Rat |
2680-3100 |
> 600 |
NT |
| Mouse |
NT |
536-891 |
NT |
| Hamster |
630-770 |
> 300, ≤ 548 |
NT |
| Rabbit |
2640-2800 |
NT |
NT |
| Dog |
1180-1450 |
> 66 |
NT |
| NT= not tested. |
Acute Nephrotoxicity (Rats)
Renal tubular lesions were observed in rats given single doses of acetaminophen
in the lethal range of 2000 to 7000 mg/kg, and similar lesions were found in
rats given 500 to 4000 mg/kg daily for up to 100 days. Attempts to produce renal
damage with single nonlethal doses of acetaminophen have been unsuccessful.159
Chronic Nephrotoxicity (Rats)
In studies using rats, rabbits, and dogs, 50 to 400 mg/kg/d of acetaminophen
for 13 to 40 weeks failed to produce any significant renal abnormalities, with
no evidence of interstitial nephritis or papillary necrosis.159
Renal lesions have occurred in rats given 300 mg/kg/d for periods of up to
32 weeks in the presence of experimentally induced renal infection, whereas
the same dose of acetaminophen failed to cause renal lesions in rats without pyelonephritis.160
* The American College of Rheumatology is an independent professional, medical,
and scientific society that does not guarantee, warrant, or endorse any commercial
product or service.
References
2. Flower RJ, Moncada S, Vane JR. Analgesic-antipyretics and
anti-inflammatory agents; drugs employed in the treatment of gout. In: Gilman
AG, Goodman LS, Gilman A, eds. The Pharmacologic Basis of Therapeutics.
7th ed. Elmsford, NY: Pergamon Press, Inc; 1985:692-695.
3. Guzman F, Braun C, Lim RKS, Potter GD, Rodgers DW. Narcotic
and non-narcotic analgesics which block visceral pain evoked by intra-arterial
injection of bradykinin and other analgesic agents. Arch Intern Pharmacodyn
Ther. 1964;149:571-588.
4. Lim RKS, Guzman F, Rogers DW, et al. Site of action of narcotic
and non-narcotic analgesics determined by blocking bradykinin-evoked visceral
pain. Arch Intern Pharmacodyn. 1964;152:25-58.
5. Bjorkman R, Hallman KM, Hedner J, Hedner T, Henning M. Acetaminophen
blocks spinal hyperalgesia induced by NMDA and substance P. Pain. 1994;57:259-264.
6. Ameer B, Greenblatt DJ. Acetaminophen. Ann Intern Med.
1977;87:202-209.
7. Atkins E, Bodel P. Fever. In: Grant L, Mucluskey RT, eds.
The Inflammatory Process. 5th ed. New York, NY: Academic Press; 1974;1:467-514.
8. Koch-Weser J. Drug therapy: acetaminophen. N Engl J Med.
1976;295:1297-1300.
9. Milton AS. Modern views on the pathogenesis of fever and
the mode of action of antipyretic drugs. J Pharm Pharmacol. 1976;28(suppl
4):393-399.
10. Clark WG, Holdeman M, Lipton JM. Analysis of the antipyretic
action of a-melanocyte-stimulating hormone in rabbits. J Physiol. 1985;359:459-465.
11. Wilkinson MF, Kasting NW. Vasopressin release within the ventral septal area of the rat brain during drug-induced antipyresis. Am
J Physiol. 1993;264:R1133-R1138.
12. Wilkinson MF, Kasting NW. Central vasopressin V1-blockade
prevents salicylate but not acetaminophen antipyresis. J Appl Physiol. 1990;68:1793-1798.
13. Feldberg W, Gupta KP, Milton AS, Wendlandt S. Effect of bacterial pyrogen and antipyretics on prostaglandin activity in cerebrospinal
fluid of unanaesthetized cats. Br J Pharmacol. 1972;46:550P-551P.
14. Flower RJ, Vane JR. Inhibition of prostaglandin synthetase
in brain explains the antipyretic activity of paracetamol (4-acetamidophenol).
Nature. 1972;240:410-411.
15. McGilveray IJ, Mattok GL, Fooks JR, Jordan N, Cook D. Acetaminophen
II: a comparison of the physiological availabilities of different commercial
dosage forms. Can J Pharmaceut Sci. 1971;6:38-42.
16. Temple AR, Mrazik TJ. More on extended-release acetaminophen
(letter). N Engl J Med. 1995;333:1508-1509.
17. Hardman JG, Limbird LE, Molinoff PB, Ruddon RW, Goodman
Gilman A, eds. Goodman and Gilman's The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics.
9th ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 1996:1712.
18. Levy G. Comparative pharmacokinetics of aspirin and acetaminophen.
Arch Intern Med. 1981;141:279-281.
19. Milligan TP, Morris HC, Hammond PM, Price CP. Studies on
paracetamol binding to serum proteins. Ann Clin Biochem. 1994;31:492-496.
20. Forrest JA, Clements JA, Prescott LF. Clinical pharmacokinetics
of paracetamol. Clin Pharmacokinet. 1982;7:93-107.
21. Bannwarth B, Netter P, Lapicque F, et al. Plasma and cerebrospinal
fluid concentrations of paracetamol after a single intravenous dose of propacetamol.
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1992;34:79-81.
22. Moreau X, Le Quay L, Granry JC, Boishardy N, Delhumeau A.
Pharmacokinetics of acetaminophen in the cerebrospinal fluid in the elderly.
Therapie. 1993;48:393-396.
23. Levy G, Garrettson LK, Soda DM. Evidence of placental transfer
of acetaminophen (letter). Pediatrics. 1975;55:895.
24. Naga Rani MA, Joseph T, Narayanan R. Placental transfer
of paracetamol. J Indian Med Assoc. 1989; 87:182-183.
25. Rollins DE, von Bahr C, Glaumann H, Moldeus P, Rane A. Acetaminophen:
potentially toxic metabolite formed by human fetal and adult liver microsomes
and isolated fetal liver cells. Science. 1979;205:1414-1416.
26. Berlin CM Jr, Yaffe SJ, Ragni M. Disposition of acetaminophen
in milk, saliva, and plasma of lactating women. Pediatr Pharmacol. 1980;1:135-141.
27. Bitzen PO, Gustafsson B, Jostell KG, Melander A, Wahlin-Boll
E. Excretion of paracetamol in human breast milk. Eur J Clin Pharmacol.
1981;20:123-125.
28. Notarianni LJ, Oldham HG, Bennett PN. Passage of paracetamol
into breast milk and its subsequent metabolism by the neonate. Br J Clin
Pharmacol. 1987;24:63-67.
29. Mitchell JR, Thorgeirsson SS, Potter WZ, Jollow DJ, Keiser
H. Acetaminophen-induced hepatic injury: protective role of glutathione in man
and rationale for therapy. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1974;16:676-684.
30. Patten CJ, Thomas PE, Guy RL, et al. Cytochrome P450 enzymes
involved in acetaminophen activation by rat and human liver microsomes and their
kinetics. Chem Res Toxicol. 1993;6:511-518.
31. Raucy JL, Lasker JM, Lieber CS, Black M. Acetaminophen activation
by human liver cytochrome P450IIE1 and P450IA2. Arch Biochem Biophys.
1989;271:270-283.
32. Thummel KE, Lee CA, Kunze KL, Nelson SD, Slattery JT. Oxidation
of acetaminophen to N-acetyl-p-aminobenzoquinone imine by human CYP3A4. Biochem
Pharmacol. 1993;45:1563-1569.
33. Prescott L. Paracetamol: A Critical Bibliographic Review.
London: Taylor and Francis, Ltd; 1996.
34. Miller RP, Roberts RJ, Fischer LJ. Acetaminophen elimination
kinetics in neonates, children, and adults. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1976;19:284-294.
35. Rawlins MD, Henderson DB, Hijab AR. Pharmacokinetics of
paracetamol (acetaminophen) after intravenous and oral administration. Eur
J Clin Pharmacol. 1977;11:283-286.
36. Lee HS, Ti TY, Koh YK, Prescott LF. Paracetamol elimination
in Chinese and Indians in Singapore. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1992;43:81-84.
37. Miners JO, Osborne NJ, Tonkin AL, Birkett DJ. Perturbation
of paracetamol urinary metabolic ratios by urine flow rate. Br J Clin Pharmacol.
1992;34: 359-362.
38. Miners JO, Atwood J, Birkett DJ. Influence of sex and oral
contraceptive steroids on paracetamol metabolism. Br J Clin Pharmacol.
1983;16:503-509.
39. Slattery JT, McRorie TI, Reynolds R, Kalhorn TF, Kharasch
ED, Eddy AC. Lack of effect of cimetidine on acetaminophen disposition in humans.
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1989;46:591-597.
40. Veronese ME, McLean S. Metabolism of paracetamol and phenacetin
in relation of debrisoquine oxidation phenotype. Eur J Clin Pharmcol. 1991;40:547-552.
41. Andrews RS, Bond CC, Burnett J, Saunders A, Watson K. Isolation
and identification of paracetamol metabolites. J Int Med Res. 1976;4(suppl
4):34-39.
42. Klutch A, Levin W, Chang RL, Vane F, Conney AH. Formation
of a thiomethyl metabolite of phenacetin and acetaminophen in dogs and man.
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1978;24:287-293.
43. Mrochek JE, Katz S, Christie WH, Dinsmore SR. Acetaminophen
metabolism in man, as determined by high-resolution liquid chromatography. Clin
Chem. 1974;20:1086-1096.
44. Critchley JA, Nimmo GR, Gregson CA, Woolhouse NM, Prescott
LF. Intersubject and ethnic differences in paracetamol metabolism. Br J Clin
Pharmacol. 1986;22:649-657.
45. Esteban A, Calvo R, Perez-Mateo M. Paracetamol metabolism
in two ethnically different Spanish populations. Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet.
1996;21:233-239.
46. Osborne NJ, Tonkin AL, Miners JO. Interethnic differences
in drug glucuronidation: a comparison of paracetamol metabolism in Caucasians
and Chinese. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1991;32:765-767.
47. Temple AR. Pediatric dosing of acetaminophen. Pediatr
Pharmacol. 1983;3:321-327.
48. Amadio P, Cummings DM. Evaluation of acetaminophen in the
management of osteoarthritis of the knee. Curr Ther Res. 1983;34:59-66.
49. Bradley J D, Brandt KD, Katz BP, Kalasinski LA, Ryan SI.
Comparison of an anti-inflammatory dose of ibuprofen, an analgesic dose of ibuprofen,
and acetaminophen in the treatment of patients with osteoarthritis of the knee.
N Engl J Med. 1991;325: 87-91.
50. Williams HJ, Ward JR, Egger MJ, et al. Comparison of naproxen
and acetaminophen in a two-year study of treatment of osteoarthritis of the
knee. Arthritis Rheum. 1993;36:1196-1206.
51. Simila S, Keinanen S, Kouvalainen K. Oral antipyretic therapy:
evaluation of benorylate, an ester of acetyl-salicylic acid and paracetamol.
Eur J Pediatr. 1975;121:15-20.
52. Steele RW, Young FH, Bass JW, Shirkey HC. Oral antipyretic
therapy: evaluation of aspirin-acetaminophen combination. Am J Dis Child.
1972;123:204-206.
53. Agbolosu NB, Cuevas LE, Milligan P, Broadhead RL, Brewster
D, Graham SM. Efficacy of tepid sponging versus paracetamol in reducing temperature
in febrile children. Ann Trop Pediatr. 1997;17:283-288.
54. Friedman AD, Barton LL. Efficacy of sponging versus acetaminophen
for reduction of fever. Pediatr Emerg Care. 1990;6:6-7.
55. Hunter J. Study of antipyretic therapy in current use. Arch
Dis Child. 1973;48:313-315.
56. Kinmonth AL, Fulton Y, Campbell MJ. Management of feverish
children at home. BMJ. 1992;305:1134-1136.
57. Eden AN, Kaufman A. Clinical comparison of three antipyretic
agents. Am J Dis Child. 1967;114:284-287.
58. Tarlin L, Landrigan P, Babineau R, Alpert JJ. A comparison
of the antipyretic effect of acetaminophen and aspirin: another approach to
poison prevention. Am J Dis Child. 1972;124:880-882.
59. Kauffman RE, Sawyer LA, Scheinbaum ML. Antipyretic efficacy
of ibuprofen vs acetaminophen. Am J Dis Child. 1992;146:622-625.
60. Walson PD, Galletta G, Chomilo F, Braden NJ, Alexander Sawyer
L, Scheinbaum ML. Comparison of multidose ibuprofen and acetaminophen therapy
in febrile children. Am J Dis Child. 1992;146:626-632.
61. Walson PD, Galletta G, Braden NJ, Alexander L. Ibuprofen,
acetaminphen, and placebo treatment of febrile children. Clin Pharmacol Ther.
1989;46:9-17.
62. Wilson JT, Don Brown R, Kearns GL, et al. Single-dose, placebo-controlled
comparative study of ibuprofen and acetaminophen antipyresis in children. J
Pediatr. 1991;119:803-811.
63. Wilson JT, Don Brown R, Kearns GL, et al. Comparative efficacy
of ibuprofen and acetaminophen in febrile children. Eur J Pharmacol. 1990;183:2277-2278.
64. Hochberg MC, Altman RD, Brandt KD, et al. Guidelines for
the medical management of osteoarthritis, part I: osteoarthritis of the hip;
part II: osteoarthritis of the knee. Arthritis Rheum. 1995;38:1535-1546.
65. Skoglund LA, Petterson N. Effects of acetaminophen after bilateral oral surgery: double dose twice daily versus standard dose four times
daily. Pharmacotherapy. 1991;11:370-375.
66. Skoglund LA, Skjelbred P, Fyllingen G. Analgesic efficacy
of acetaminophen 1000 mg, acetaminophen 2000 mg, and the combination of acetaminophen
1000 mg and codeine phosphate 60 mg versus placebo in acute postoperative pain.
Pharmacotherapy. 1991;11:364-369.
67. Cooper SA, Schachtel BP, Goldman E, Gelb S, Cohn P. Ibuprofen
and acetaminophen in the relief of acute pain: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled
study. J Clin Pharmacol. 1989;29:1026-1030.
68. Mehlisch DR, Sollecito WA, Helfrick JF, et al. Multicenter
clinical trial of ibuprofen and acetaminophen in the treatment of postoperative
dental pain. J Am Dent Assoc. 1990;121:257-263.
69. Rodrigo C, Chau M, Rosenquist J. A comparison of paracetamol
and diflunisal for pain control following 3rd molar surgery. Int J Oral Maxillofac
Surg. 1989;18:130-132.
70. Quiding H, Oikarinen V, Sane J, Sjoblad AM. Analgesic efficacy
after single and repeated doses of codeine and acetaminophen. J Clin Pharmacol.
1984;24:27-34.
71. Lasagna L, Davis M, Pearson JW. A comparison of acetophenetidin
and acetaminophen, I: analgesic effects in postpartum patients. J Pharmacol
Exp Ther. 1967;155:296-300.
72. Kantor TG, Meisner M, Laska E, Sunshine A. A computer program
for the clinical study of analgesic compounds (abstract). Fed Proc. 1964;23:176.
73. Hopkinson JH III, Bartlett FH Jr, Steffens AO, McGlumphy
TH, Macht EL, Smith L. Acetaminophen versus propoxyphene hydrochloride for relief
of pain in episiotomy patients. J Clin Pharmacol. 1973;13:251-263.
74. McQuay HJ, Carroll D, Frankland T, Harvey M, Moore A. Bromfenac,
acetaminophen, and placebo in orthopedic postoperative pain. Clin Pharmacol
Ther. 1990;47:760-766.
75. McQuay HJ, Poppleton P, Carroll D, Summerfield RJ, Bullingham
RE, Moore RA. Ketorolac and acetaminophen for orthopedic postoperative pain.
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1986;39:89-93.
76. Aoki FY, Yassi A, Cheang M, et al. Effects of acetaminophen
on adverse effects of influenza vaccination in health care workers. CMAJ.
1993;149:1425-1430.
77. Wallenstein SL, Houde RW. Clinical comparison of analgesic
effectiveness of N-acetyl-aminophenol, salicylamide, and aspirin (abstract).
Fed Proc. 1954;13:414.
78. Moertel CG, Ahmann DL, Taylor WF, Schwartau N. A comparative
evaluation of marketed analgesic drugs. N Engl J Med. 1972;286:813-815.
79. Schachtel BP, Fillingim JM, Thoden WR, Lane AC, Baybutt
RI. Sore throat pain in the evaluation of mild analgesics. Clin Pharmacol
Ther. 1988;44:704-711.
80. Reuter SH, Montgomery WW. Aspirin versus acetaminophen after
tonsillectomy. Arch Otolaryngol. 1964;80:214-217.
81. Anderson B, Kanagasundarum S, Woollard G. Analgesic efficacy
of paracetamol in children using tonsillectomy as a pain model. Anaesth Intens
Care. 1996;24:669-673.
156. Toxicological Research Report. Safety evaluation of Tylenol®
(acetaminophen, McN-R-51) by repeated intramuscular administration to dogs for
4 weeks. McNeil Laboratories, Inc. November 21, 1963.
157. Thomas BH, Nera EA, Zeitz W. Failure to observe pathology
in the rat following chronic dosing with acetaminophen and acetylsalicylic acid.
Res Comm Chem Pathol Pharmacol. 1977;17:663-678.
158. Boyd EM, Hogan SE. The chronic oral toxicity of paracetamol
at the range of the LD50 (100 days) in albino rats. Can J Physiol Pharmacol.
1968;46: 239-245.
159. Prescott LF. Analgesic nephropathy: a reassessment of the
role of phenacetin and other analgesics. Drugs. 1982;23:75-149.
160. Furman KI, Kundig H, Lewin JR. Experimental paracetamol
nephropathy and pyelonephritis in rats. Clin Nephrol. 1981;16:271-275.
Last updated on RxList: 11/7/2007