Patients with variceal bleeding, hepatic encephalopathy, ascites or in need
of an urgent liver transplant, should receive appropriate specific treatment.
Nonclinical Toxicology
Carcinogenicity, Mutagenicity and Impairment of Fertility
In two 24-month oral carcinogenicity studies in mice, urso (ursodiol) diol at doses up
to 1,000 mg/kg/day (3,000 mg/m²/day) was not tumorigenic. Based on body
surface area, for a 50 kg person of average height (1.46 m² body surface
area), this dose represents 5.4 times the recommended maximum clinical dose
of 15 mg/kg/day (555 mg/m²/day).
In a two-year oral carcinogenicity study in Fischer 344 rats, urso (ursodiol) diol at doses
up to 300 mg/kg/day (1,800 mg/m²/day, 3.2 times the recommended maximum
human dose based on body surface area) was not tumorigenic.
In a life-span (126-138 weeks) oral carcinogenicity study, Sprague-Dawley rats
were treated with doses of 33 to 300 mg/kg/day, 0.4 to 3.2 times the recommended
maximum human dose based on body surface area. Urso (ursodiol) diol produced a significantly
(p ≤ 0.5, Fisher's exact test) increased incidence of pheochromocytomas of
the adrenal medulla in females of the highest dose group.
In 103-week oral carcinogenicity studies of lithocholic acid, a metabolite
of urso (ursodiol) diol, doses up to 250 mg/kg/day in mice and 500 mg/kg/day in rats did
not produce any tumors. In a 78-week rat study, intrarectal instillation of
lithocholic acid (1 mg/kg/day) for 13 months did not produce colorectal tumors.
A tumor-promoting effect was observed when it was administered after a single
intrarectal dose of a known carcinogen N-methyl-N'-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine.
On the other hand, in a 32-week rat study, urso (ursodiol) diol at a daily dose of 240 mg/kg
(1,440 mg/m², 2.6 times the maximum recommended human dose based on body
surface area) suppressed the colonic carcinogenic effect of another known carcinogen
azoxymethane.
Urso (ursodiol) diol was not genotoxic in the Ames test, the mouse lymphoma cell (L5178Y,
TK+/-) forward mutation test, the human lymphocyte sister chromatid exchange
test, the mouse spermatogonia chromosome aberration test, the Chinese hamster
micronucleus test and the Chinese hamster bone marrow cell chromosome aberration
test.
Urso (ursodiol) diol at oral doses of up to 2,700 mg/kg/day (16,200 mg/m²/day, 29
times the recommended maximum human dose based on body surface area) was found
to have no effect on fertility and reproductive performance of male and female
rats.
Use In Specific Populations
Pregnancy
Pregnancy Category B. Reproduction studies have been performed in pregnant
rats at oral doses up to 22 times the recommended maximum human dose (based
on body surface area) and in pregnant rabbits at oral doses up to 7 times the
recommended maximum human dose (based on body surface area) and have revealed
no evidence of impaired fertility or harm to the fetus due to urso (ursodiol) diol.
There are no adequate or well-controlled studies in pregnant women. Because
animal reproduction studies are not always predictive of human response, this
drug should be used during pregnancy only if clearly needed.
Nursing Mothers
It is not known whether urso (ursodiol) diol is excreted in human milk. Because many drugs
are excreted in human milk, caution should be exercised when URSO 250 (urso (ursodiol) diol) and URSO (ursodiol)
Forte are administered to a nursing mother.
Pediatric Use
The safety and effectiveness of URSO 250 (urso (ursodiol) diol) and URSO (ursodiol) Forte in pediatric patients
have not been established.
Last reviewed on RxList: 12/28/2009
This monograph has been modified to include the generic and brand name in many instances.