Pharmacokinetics
General Pharmacokinetic Characteristics
The pharmacokinetics of voriconazole have been characterized in healthy subjects, special populations and patients.
The pharmacokinetics of voriconazole are non-linear due to saturation of its
metabolism. The interindividual variability of voriconazole pharmacokinetics
is high. Greater than proportional increase in exposure is observed with increasing
dose. It is estimated that, on average, increasing the oral dose in healthy
subjects from 200 mg Q12h to 300 mg Q12h leads to a 2.5-fold increase in exposure
(AUCτ), while increasing the intravenous dose from 3 mg/kg Q12h
to 4 mg/kg Q12h produces a 2.3-fold increase in exposure (Table 1).
Table 1: Population Pharmacokinetic Parameters of Voriconazole
in Subjects
| |
200 mg Oral
Q12h |
300 mg Oral
Q12h |
3 mg/kg IV
Q12h |
4 mg/kg IV
Q12h |
AUCτ * (µg•h/mL)
(CV%) |
19.86
(94%) |
50.32
(74%) |
21.81
(100%) |
50.40
(83%) |
| *Mean AUCτ are predicted values
from population pharmacokinetic analysis of data from 236 subjects |
During oral administration of 200 mg or 300 mg twice daily for 14 days in patients at risk of aspergillosis (mainly patients with malignant neoplasms of lymphatic or hematopoietic tissue), the observed pharmacokinetic characteristics were similar to those observed in healthy subjects (Table 2).
Table 2: Pharmacokinetic Parameters of Voriconazole in Patients
at Risk for Aspergillosis
| |
200 mg Oral Q12h
(n=9) |
300 mg Oral Q12h
(n=9) |
AUCτ* (µg•h/mL )
(CV%) |
20.31
(69%) |
36.51
(45%) |
Cmax* (µg/mL)
(CV%) |
3.00
(51%) |
4.66
(35%) |
| *Geometric mean values on Day 14 of multiple dosing in 2 cohorts
of patients |
Sparse plasma sampling for pharmacokinetics was conducted in the therapeutic studies in patients aged 12-18 years. In 11 adolescent patients who received a mean voriconazole maintenance dose of 4 mg/kg IV, the median of the calculated mean plasma concentrations was 1.60 µg/mL (inter-quartile range 0.28 to 2.73 µg/mL). In 17 adolescent patients for whom mean plasma concentrations were calculated following a mean oral maintenance dose of 200 mg Q12h, the median of the calculated mean plasma concentrations was 1.16 µg/mL (inter-quartile range 0.85 to 2.14 µg/mL).
When the recommended intravenous or oral loading dose regimens are administered to healthy subjects, peak plasma concentrations close to steady state are achieved within the first 24 hours of dosing. Without the loading dose, accumulation occurs during twice-daily multiple dosing with steady-state peak plasma voriconazole concentrations being achieved by day 6 in the majority of subjects (Table 3).
Table 3: Pharmacokinetic Parameters of Voriconazole from
Loading Dose and Maintenance Dose Regimens (Individual Studies in Subjects)
| |
400 mg Q12h on Day 1,
200 mg Q12h on Days 2 to 10
(n=17) |
6 mg/kg IV** Q12h on Day 1,
3 mg/kg IV Q12h on Days 2 to 10
(n=9) |
| |
Day 1, 1st dose |
Day 10 |
Day 1, 1st dose |
Day 10 |
AUCτ * (µg•h/mL)
(CV%) |
9.31
(38%) |
11.13
(103%) |
13.22
(22%) |
13.25
(58%) |
Cmax (µg/mL)
(CV%) |
2.30
(19%) |
2.08
(62%) |
4.70
(22%) |
3.06
(31%) |
*AUCτ values are calculated over dosing interval
of 12 hours
Pharmacokinetic parameters for loading and maintenance doses summarized
for same cohort of subjects
**IV infusion over 60 minutes |
Steady state trough plasma concentrations with voriconazole are achieved after approximately 5 days of oral or intravenous dosing without a loading dose regimen. However, when an intravenous loading dose regimen is used, steady state trough plasma concentrations are achieved within 1 day.
Absorption
The pharmacokinetic properties of voriconazole are similar following administration by the intravenous and oral routes. Based on a population pharmacokinetic analysis of pooled data in healthy subjects (N=207), the oral bioavailability of voriconazole is estimated to be 96% (CV 13%). Bioequivalence was established between the 200 mg tablet and the 40 mg/mL oral suspension when administered as a 400 mg Q12h loading dose followed by a 200 mg Q12h maintenance dose.
Maximum plasma concentrations (Cmax) are achieved 1-2 hours after dosing. When
multiple doses of voriconazole are administered with high-fat meals, the mean
Cmax and AUCτ are reduced by 34% and 24%, respectively when administered
as a tablet and by 58% and 37% respectively when administered as the oral suspension
(see DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION).
In healthy subjects, the absorption of voriconazole is not affected by coadministration of oral ranitidine, cimetidine, or omeprazole, drugs that are known to increase gastric pH.
Distribution
The volume of distribution at steady state for voriconazole is estimated to be 4.6 L/kg, suggesting extensive distribution into tissues. Plasma protein binding is estimated to be 58% and was shown to be independent of plasma concentrations achieved following single and multiple oral doses of 200 mg or 300 mg (approximate range: 0.9-15 µg/mL). Varying degrees of hepatic and renal insufficiency do not affect the protein binding of voriconazole.
Metabolism
In vitro studies showed that voriconazole is metabolized by the human
hepatic cytochrome P450 enzymes, CYP2C19, CYP2C9 and CYP3A4 (see CLINICAL
PHARMACOLOGY - Drug Interactions).
In vivo studies indicated that CYP2C19 is significantly involved in
the metabolism of voriconazole. This enzyme exhibits genetic polymorphism. For
example, 15-20% of Asian populations may be expected to be poor metabolizers.
For Caucasians and Blacks, the prevalence of poor metabolizers is 3-5%. Studies
conducted in Caucasian and Japanese healthy subjects have shown that poor metabolizers
have, on average, 4-fold higher voriconazole exposure (AUCτ)
than their homozygous extensive metabolizer counterparts. Subjects who are heterozygous
extensive metabolizers have, on average, 2-fold higher voriconazole exposure
than their homozygous extensive metabolizer counterparts.
The major metabolite of voriconazole is the N-oxide, which accounts for 72% of the circulating radiolabelled metabolites in plasma. Since this metabolite has minimal antifungal activity, it does not contribute to the overall efficacy of voriconazole.
Excretion
Voriconazole is eliminated via hepatic metabolism with less than 2% of the
dose excreted unchanged in the urine. After administration of a single radiolabelled
dose of either oral or IV voriconazole, preceded by multiple oral or IV dosing,
approximately 80% to 83% of the radioactivity is recovered in the urine. The
majority ( > 94%) of the total radioactivity is excreted in the first 96 hours
after both oral and intravenous dosing.
As a result of non-linear pharmacokinetics, the terminal half-life of voriconazole is dose dependent and therefore not useful in predicting the accumulation or elimination of voriconazole.
Pharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic Relationships
Clinical Efficacy and Safety
In 10 clinical trials, the median values for the average and maximum voriconazole
plasma concentrations in individual patients across these studies (N=1121) was
2.51 µg/mL (inter-quartile range 1.21 to 4.44 µg/mL) and 3.79 µg/mL
(inter-quartile range 2.06 to 6.31 µg/mL), respectively. A pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic
analysis of patient data from 6 of these 10 clinical trials (N=280) could not
detect a positive association between mean, maximum or minimum plasma voriconazole
concentration and efficacy. However, PK/PD analyses of the data from all 10
clinical trials identified positive associations between plasma voriconazole
concentrations and rate of both liver function test abnormalities and visual
disturbances (see ADVERSE REACTIONS).
Electrocardiogram
A placebo-controlled, randomized, crossover study to evaluate the effect on
the QT interval of healthy male and female subjects was conducted with three
single oral doses of voriconazole and ketoconazole. Serial ECGs and plasma samples
were obtained at specified intervals over a 24-hour post dose observation period.
The placebo-adjusted mean maximum increases in QTc from baseline after 800,
1200 and 1600 mg of voriconazole and after ketoconazole 800 mg were all <
10 msec. Females exhibited a greater increase in QTc than males, although all
mean changes were < 10 msec. Age was not found to affect the magnitude of
increase in QTc. No subject in any group had an increase in QTc of ≥ 60 msec
from baseline. No subject experienced an interval exceeding the potentially
clinically relevant threshold of 500 msec. However, the QT effect of voriconazole
combined with drugs known to prolong the QT interval is unknown (see CONTRAINDICATIONS,
PRECAUTIONS: DRUG INTERACTIONS).
Pharmacokinetics in Special Populations
Gender
In a multiple oral dose study, the mean Cmax and AUCτ for healthy
young females were 83% and 113% higher, respectively, than in healthy young
males (18-45 years), after tablet dosing. In the same study, no significant
differences in the mean Cmax and AUCτ were observed between healthy
elderly males and healthy elderly females ( ≥ 65 years). In a similar study,
after dosing with the oral suspension, the mean AUC for healthy young females
was 45% higher than in healthy young males whereas the mean Cmax was comparable
between genders. The steady state trough voriconazole concentrations (Cmin)
seen in females were 100% and 91% higher than in males receiving the tablet
and the oral suspension, respectively.
In the clinical program, no dosage adjustment was made on the basis of gender. The safety profile and plasma concentrations observed in male and female subjects were similar. Therefore, no dosage adjustment based on gender is necessary.
Geriatric
In an oral multiple dose study the mean Cmax and AUCτ in healthy
elderly males ( ≥ 65 years) were 61% and 86% higher, respectively, than in young
males (18-45 years). No significant differences in the mean Cmax and AUCτ
were observed between healthy elderly females ( ≥ 65 years) and healthy young
females (18-45 years).
In the clinical program, no dosage adjustment was made on the basis of age. An analysis of pharmacokinetic data obtained from 552 patients from 10 voriconazole clinical trials showed that the median voriconazole plasma concentrations in the elderly patients ( > 65 years) were approximately 80% to 90% higher than those in the younger patients ( ≤ 65 years) after either IV or oral administration. However, the safety profile of voriconazole in young and elderly subjects was similar and, therefore, no dosage adjustment is necessary for the elderly.
Pediatric
A population pharmacokinetic analysis was conducted on pooled data from 35
immunocompromised pediatric patients aged 2 to < 12 years old who were included
in two pharmacokinetic studies of intravenous voriconazole (single dose and
multiple dose). Twenty-four of these patients received multiple intravenous
maintenance doses of 3 mg/kg and 4 mg/kg. A comparison of the pediatric and
adult population pharmacokinetic data revealed that the predicted average steady
state plasma concentrations were similar at the maintenance dose of 4 mg/kg
every 12 hours in children and 3 mg/kg every 12 hours in adults (medians of
1.19 µg/mL and 1.16 µg/mL in children and adults, respectively)
(see PRECAUTIONS, Pediatric Use).
Hepatic Insufficiency
After a single oral dose (200 mg) of voriconazole in 8 patients with mild (Child-Pugh
Class A) and 4 patients with moderate (Child-Pugh Class B) hepatic insufficiency,
the mean systemic exposure (AUC) was 3.2-fold higher than in age and weight
matched controls with normal hepatic function. There was no difference in mean
peak plasma concentrations (Cmax) between the groups. When only the patients
with mild (Child-Pugh Class A) hepatic insufficiency were compared to controls,
there was still a 2.3-fold increase in the mean AUC in the group with hepatic
insufficiency compared to controls.
In an oral multiple dose study, AUCτ was similar in 6 subjects
with moderate hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh Class B) given a lower maintenance
dose of 100 mg twice daily compared to 6 subjects with normal hepatic function
given the standard 200 mg twice daily maintenance dose. The mean peak plasma
concentrations (Cmax) were 20% lower in the hepatically impaired group.
It is recommended that the standard loading dose regimens be used but that
the maintenance dose be halved in patients with mild to moderate hepatic cirrhosis
(Child-Pugh Class A and B) receiving voriconazole. No pharmacokinetic data are
available for patients with severe hepatic cirrhosis (Child-Pugh Class C) (see
DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION).
Renal Insufficiency
In a single oral dose (200 mg) study in 24 subjects with normal renal function
and mild to severe renal impairment, systemic exposure (AUC) and peak plasma
concentration (Cmax) of voriconazole were not significantly affected by renal
impairment. Therefore, no adjustment is necessary for oral dosing in patients
with mild to severe renal impairment.
In a multiple dose study of IV voriconazole (6 mg/kg IV loading dose x 2, then
3 mg/kg IV x 5.5 days) in 7 patients with moderate renal dysfunction (creatinine
clearance 30-50 mL/min), the systemic exposure (AUC) and peak plasma concentrations
(Cmax) were not significantly different from those in 6 subjects with normal
renal function.
However, in patients with moderate renal dysfunction (creatinine clearance
30-50 mL/min), accumulation of the intravenous vehicle, SBECD, occurs. The mean
systemic exposure (AUC) and peak plasma concentrations (Cmax) of SBECD were
increased 4-fold and almost 50%, respectively, in the moderately impaired group
compared to the normal control group.
Intravenous voriconazole should be avoided in patients with moderate or severe
renal impairment (creatinine clearance < 50 mL/min), unless an assessment
of the benefit/risk to the patient justifies the use of intravenous voriconazole
(see DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION - Dosage Adjustment).
A pharmacokinetic study in subjects with renal failure undergoing hemodialysis showed that voriconazole is dialyzed with clearance of 121 mL/min. The intravenous vehicle, SBECD, is hemodialyzed with clearance of 55 mL/min. A 4-hour hemodialysis session does not remove a sufficient amount of voriconazole to warrant dose adjustment.
Drug Interactions
Effects of Other Drugs on Voriconazole
Voriconazole is metabolized by the human hepatic cytochrome P450 enzymes CYP2C19,
CYP2C9, and CYP3A4. Results of in vitro metabolism studies indicate that
the affinity of voriconazole is highest for CYP2C19, followed by CYP2C9, and
is appreciably lower for CYP3A4. Inhibitors or inducers of these three enzymes
may increase or decrease voriconazole systemic exposure (plasma concentrations),
respectively.
The systemic exposure to voriconazole is significantly reduced or is
expected to be reduced by the concomitant administration of the following agents
and their use is contraindicated:
Rifampin (potent CYP450 inducer): Rifampin (600 mg once daily)
decreased the steady state Cmax and AUCτ of voriconazole (200
mg Q12h x 7 days) by an average of 93% and 96%, respectively, in healthy subjects.
Doubling the dose of voriconazole to 400 mg Q12h does not restore adequate exposure
to voriconazole during coadministration with rifampin. Coadministration of
voriconazole and rifampin is contraindicated (see CONTRAINDICATIONS,
PRECAUTIONS: DRUG INTERACTIONS).
Ritonavir (potent CYP450 inducer; CYP3A4 inhibitor and substrate):
The effect of the coadministration of voriconazole and ritonavir (400 mg
and 100 mg) was investigated in two separate studies. High-dose ritonavir (400
mg Q12h for 9 days) decreased the steady state Cmax and AUCτ
of oral voriconazole (400 mg Q12h for 1 day, then 200 mg Q12h for 8 days) by
an average of 66% and 82%, respectively, in healthy subjects. Low-dose ritonavir
(100 mg Q12h for 9 days) decreased the steady state Cmax and AUCτ
of oral voriconazole (400 mg Q12h for 1 day, then 200 mg Q12h for 8 days) by
an average of 24% and 39%, respectively, in healthy subjects. Although repeat
oral administration of voriconazole did not have a significant effect on steady
state Cmax and AUCτ of high-dose ritonavir in healthy subjects,
steady state Cmax and AUCτ of low-dose ritonavir decreased slightly
by 24% and 14% respectively, when administered concomitantly with oral voriconazole
in healthy subjects. Coadministration of voriconazole and high-dose ritonavir
(400 mg Q12h) is contraindicated. Coadministration of voriconazole and low-dose
ritonavir (100 mg Q12h) should be avoided, unless an assessment of the benefit/risk
to the patient justifies the use of voriconazole. (see CONTRAINDICATIONS,
PRECAUTIONS: DRUG INTERACTIONS).
St. John's Wort (CYP450 inducer; P-gp inducer): In an independent
published study in healthy volunteers who were given multiple oral doses of
St. John's Wort (300 mg LI 160 extract three times daily for 15 days) followed
by a single 400 mg oral dose of voriconazole, a 59% decrease in mean voriconazole
AUC0-&inifn; was observed. In contrast, coadministration of single oral doses
of St. John's Wort and voriconazole had no appreciable effect on voriconazole
AUC0-&inifn;. Because long-term use of St. John's Wort could lead
to reduced voriconazole exposure, concomitant use of voriconazole with St.
John's Wort is contraindicated (see CONTRAINDICATIONS).
Carbamazepine and long-acting barbiturates (potent CYP450 inducers):
Although not studied in vitro or in vivo, carbamazepine and long-acting
barbiturates (e.g., phenobarbital, mephobarbital) are likely to significantly
decrease plasma voriconazole concentrations. Coadministration of voriconazole
with carbamazepine or long-acting barbiturates is contraindicated (see CONTRAINDICATIONS,
PRECAUTIONS: DRUG INTERACTIONS).
Minor or no significant pharmacokinetic interactions that do not require
dosage adjustment:
Cimetidine (non-specific CYP450 inhibitor and increases gastric pH):
Cimetidine (400 mg Q12h x 8 days) increased voriconazole steady state Cmax
and AUCτ by an average of 18% (90% CI: 6%, 32%) and 23% (90%
CI: 13%, 33%), respectively, following oral doses of 200 mg Q12h x 7 days to
healthy subjects.
Ranitidine (increases gastric pH): Ranitidine (150 mg Q12h) had
no significant effect on voriconazole Cmax and AUCτ following
oral doses of 200 mg Q12h x 7 days to healthy subjects.
Macrolide antibiotics: Coadministration of erythromycin
(CYP3A4 inhibitor;1g Q12h for 7 days) or azithromycin (500 mg qd for
3 days) with voriconazole 200 mg Q12h for 14 days had no significant effect
on voriconazole steady state Cmax and AUCτ in healthy subjects.
The effects of voriconazole on the pharmacokinetics of either erythromycin or
azithromycin are not known.
Effects of Voriconazole on Other Drugs
In vitro studies with human hepatic microsomes show that voriconazole
inhibits the metabolic activity of the cytochrome P450 enzymes CYP2C19, CYP2C9,
and CYP3A4. In these studies, the inhibition potency of voriconazole for CYP3A4
metabolic activity was significantly less than that of two other azoles, ketoconazole
and itraconazole. In vitro studies also show that the major metabolite
of voriconazole, voriconazole N-oxide, inhibits the metabolic activity of CYP2C9
and CYP3A4 to a greater extent than that of CYP2C19. Therefore, there is potential
for voriconazole and its major metabolite to increase the systemic exposure
(plasma concentrations) of other drugs metabolized by these CYP450 enzymes.
The systemic exposure of the following drugs is significantly increased
or is expected to be significantly increased by coadministration of voriconazole
and their use is contraindicated:
Sirolimus (CYP3A4 substrate): Repeat dose administration of oral
voriconazole (400 mg Q12h for 1 day, then 200 mg Q12h for 8 days) increased
the Cmax and AUC of sirolimus (2 mg single dose) an average of 7-fold (90% CI:
5.7, 7.5) and 11-fold (90% CI: 9.9, 12.6), respectively, in healthy male subjects.
Coadministration of voriconazole and sirolimus is contraindicated (see
CONTRAINDICATIONS, PRECAUTIONS: DRUG
INTERACTIONS).
Terfenadine, astemizole, cisapride, pimozide and quinidine (CYP3A4
substrates): Although not studied in vitro or in vivo, concomitant
administration of voriconazole with terfenadine, astemizole, cisapride, pimozide
or quinidine may result in inhibition of the metabolism of these drugs. Increased
plasma concentrations of these drugs can lead to QT prolongation and rare occurrences
of torsade de pointes. Coadministration of voriconazole and terfenadine,
astemizole, cisapride, pimozide and quinidine is contraindicated (see CONTRAINDICATIONS,
PRECAUTIONS: DRUG INTERACTIONS).
Ergot alkaloids: Although not studied in vitro or in
vivo, voriconazole may increase the plasma concentration of ergot alkaloids
(ergotamine and dihydroergotamine) and lead to ergotism. Coadministration
of voriconazole with ergot alkaloids is contraindicated (see CONTRAINDICATIONS,
PRECAUTIONS: DRUG INTERACTIONS).
Coadministration of voriconazole with the following agents results in
increased exposure or is expected to result in increased exposure to these drugs.
Therefore, careful monitoring and/or dosage adjustment of these drugs is needed:
Alfentanil (CYP3A4 substrate): Coadministration of multiple doses
of oral voriconazole (400 mg q12h on day 1, 200 mg q12h on day 2) with a single
20 mcg/kg intravenous dose of alfentanil with concomitant naloxone resulted
in a 6-fold increase in mean alfentanil AUC0-&inifn; and
a 4-fold prolongation of mean alfentanil elimination half-life, compared to
when alfentanil was given alone. An increase in the incidence of delayed and
persistent alfentanil-associated nausea and vomiting during co-administration
of voriconazole and alfentanil was also observed. Reduction in the dose of alfentanil
or other opiates that are also metabolized by CYP3A4 (e.g., sufentanil), and
extended close monitoring of patients for respiratory and other opiate-associated
adverse events, may be necessary when any of these opiates is coadministered
with voriconazole. (see PRECAUTIONS: DRUG INTERACTIONS).
Cyclosporine (CYP3A4 substrate): In stable renal transplant recipients
receiving chronic cyclosporine therapy, concomitant administration of oral voriconazole
(200 mg Q12h for 8 days) increased cyclosporine Cmax and AUCτ
an average of 1.1 times (90% CI: 0.9, 1.41) and 1.7 times (90% CI: 1.5, 2.0),
respectively, as compared to when cyclosporine was administered without voriconazole.
When initiating therapy with voriconazole in patients already receiving cyclosporine,
it is recommended that the cyclosporine dose be reduced to one-half of the original
dose and followed with frequent monitoring of the cyclosporine blood levels.
Increased cyclosporine levels have been associated with nephrotoxicity. When
voriconazole is discontinued, cyclosporine levels should be frequently monitored
and the dose increased as necessary (see PRECAUTIONS: DRUG
INTERACTIONS).
Methadone (CYP3A4, CYP2C19, CYP2C9 substrate): Repeat dose administration
of oral voriconazole (400mg Q12h for 1 day, then 200mg Q12h for 4 days) increased
the Cmax and AUCτ of pharmacologically active R-methadone by
31% (90% CI: 22%, 40%) and 47% (90% CI: 38%, 57%), respectively, in subjects
receiving a methadone maintenance dose (30-100 mg QD). The Cmax and AUC of (S)-methadone
increased by 65% (90% CI: 53%, 79%) and 103% (90% CI: 85%, 124%), respectively.
Increased plasma concentrations of methadone have been associated with toxicity
including QT prolongation. Frequent monitoring for adverse events and toxicity
related to methadone is recommended during coadministration. Dose reduction
of methadone may be needed (see PRECAUTIONS: DRUG
INTERACTIONS).
Tacrolimus (CYP3A4 substrate): Repeat oral dose administration
of voriconazole (400 mg Q12h x 1 day, then 200 mg Q12h x 6 days) increased tacrolimus
(0.1 mg/kg single dose) Cmax and AUCτ in healthy subjects by
an average of 2-fold (90% CI: 1.9, 2.5) and 3-fold (90% CI: 2.7, 3.8), respectively.
When initiating therapy with voriconazole in patients already receiving tacrolimus,
it is recommended that the tacrolimus dose be reduced to one-third of the original
dose and followed with frequent monitoring of the tacrolimus blood levels. Increased
tacrolimus levels have been associated with nephrotoxicity. When voriconazole
is discontinued, tacrolimus levels should be carefully monitored and the dose
increased as necessary (see PRECAUTIONS: DRUG INTERACTIONS).
Warfarin(CYP2C9 substrate): Coadministration of voriconazole
(300 mg Q12h x 12 days) with warfarin (30 mg single dose) significantly increased
maximum prothrombin time by approximately 2 times that of placebo in healthy
subjects. Close monitoring of prothrombin time or other suitable anticoagulation
tests is recommended if warfarin and voriconazole are coadministered and the
warfarin dose adjusted accordingly (see PRECAUTIONS: DRUG
INTERACTIONS).
Oral Coumarin Anticoagulants (CYP2C9, CYP3A4 substrates): Although
not studied in vitro or in vivo, voriconazole may increase the
plasma concentrations of coumarin anticoagulants and therefore may cause an
increase in prothrombin time. If patients receiving coumarin preparations are
treated simultaneously with voriconazole, the prothrombin time or other suitable
anti-coagulation tests should be monitored at close intervals and the dosage
of anticoagulants adjusted accordingly (see PRECAUTIONS: DRUG
INTERACTIONS).
Statins(CYP3A4 substrates): Although not studied clinically,
voriconazole has been shown to inhibit lovastatin metabolism in vitro
(human liver microsomes). Therefore, voriconazole is likely to increase the
plasma concentrations of statins that are metabolized by CYP3A4. It is recommended
that dose adjustment of the statin be considered during coadministration. Increased
statin concentrations in plasma have been associated with rhabdomyolysis (see
PRECAUTIONS: DRUG INTERACTIONS).
Benzodiazepines (CYP3A4 substrates): Although not studied clinically,
voriconazole has been shown to inhibit midazolam metabolism in vitro
(human liver microsomes). Therefore, voriconazole is likely to increase the
plasma concentrations of benzodiazepines that are metabolized by CYP3A4 (e.g.,
midazolam, triazolam, and alprazolam) and lead to a prolonged sedative effect.
It is recommended that dose adjustment of the benzodiazepine be considered during
coadministration (see PRECAUTIONS: DRUG INTERACTIONS).
Calcium Channel Blockers (CYP3A4 substrates): Although not studied
clinically, voriconazole has been shown to inhibit felodipine metabolism in
vitro (human liver microsomes). Therefore, voriconazole may increase the
plasma concentrations of calcium channel blockers that are metabolized by CYP3A4.
Frequent monitoring for adverse events and toxicity related to calcium channel
blockers is recommended during coadministration. Dose adjustment of the calcium
channel blocker may be needed (see PRECAUTIONS: DRUG
INTERACTIONS).
Sulfonylureas (CYP2C9 substrates): Although not studied in
vitro or in vivo, voriconazole may increase plasma concentrations
of sulfonylureas (e.g., tolbutamide, glipizide, and glyburide) and therefore
cause hypoglycemia. Frequent monitoring of blood glucose and appropriate adjustment
(i.e., reduction) of the sulfonylurea dosage is recommended during coadministration
(see PRECAUTIONS: DRUG INTERACTIONS).
Vinca Alkaloids (CYP3A4 substrates): Although not studied in
vitro or in vivo, voriconazole may increase the plasma concentrations
of the vinca alkaloids (e.g., vincristine and vinblastine) and lead to neurotoxicity.
Therefore, it is recommended that dose adjustment of the vinca alkaloid be considered.
No significant pharmacokinetic interactions were observed when voriconazole
was coadministered with the following agents. Therefore, no dosage adjustment
for these agents is recommended:
Prednisolone (CYP3A4 substrate): Voriconazole (200 mg Q12h x
30 days) increased Cmax and AUC of prednisolone (60 mg single dose) by an average
of 11% and 34%, respectively, in healthy subjects.
Digoxin (P-glycoprotein mediated transport): Voriconazole (200
mg Q12h x 12 days) had no significant effect on steady state Cmax and AUCτ
of digoxin (0.25 mg once daily for 10 days) in healthy subjects.
Mycophenolic acid (UDP-glucuronyl transferase substrate): Voriconazole
(200 mg Q12h x 5 days) had no significant effect on the Cmax and AUCτ
of mycophenolic acid and its major metabolite, mycophenolic acid glucuronide
after administration of a 1 g single oral dose of mycophenolate mofetil.
Two-Way Interactions
Concomitant use of the following agents with voriconazole is contraindicated:
Rifabutin (potent CYP450 inducer): Rifabutin (300 mg once daily)
decreased the Cmax and AUCτ of voriconazole at 200 mg twice daily
by an average of 67% (90% CI: 58%, 73%) and 79% (90% CI: 71%, 84%), respectively,
in healthy subjects. During coadministration with rifabutin (300 mg once daily),
the steady state Cmax and AUCτ of voriconazole following an increased
dose of 400 mg twice daily were on average approximately 2 times higher, compared
with voriconazole alone at 200 mg twice daily. Coadministration of voriconazole
at 400 mg twice daily with rifabutin 300 mg twice daily increased the Cmax and
AUCτ of rifabutin by an average of 3-times (90% CI: 2.2, 4.0)
and 4 times (90% CI: 3.5, 5.4), respectively, compared to rifabutin given alone.
Coadministration of voriconazole and rifabutin is contraindicated.
Significant drug interactions that may require dosage adjustment, frequent
monitoring of drug levels and/or frequent monitoring of drug-related adverse
events/toxicity:
Efavirenz, a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (CYP450
inducer; CYP3A4 inhibitor and substrate): Standard doses of voriconazole
and standard doses of efavirenz must not be coadministered (see PRECAUTIONS:
DRUG INTERACTIONS). Steady state efavirenz (400
mg PO QD) decreased the steady state Cmax and AUCτ of voriconazole
(400 mg PO Q12h for 1 day, then 200 mg PO Q12h for 8 days) by an average of
61% and 77%, respectively, in healthy male subjects. Voriconazole at steady
state (400 mg PO Q12h for 1 day, then 200 mg Q12h for 8 days) increased the
steady state Cmax and AUCτ of efavirenz (400 mg PO QD for 9 days)
by an average of 38% and 44%, respectively, in healthy subjects.
The pharmacokinetics of adjusted doses of voriconazole and efavirenz were studied in healthy male subjects following administration of voriconazole (400 mg PO Q12h on Days 2 to 7) with efavirenz (300 mg PO Q24h on Days 1-7), relative to steady-state administration of voriconazole (400 mg for 1 day, then 200 mg PO Q12h for 2 days) or efavirenz (600 mg Q24h for 9 days). Coadministration of voriconazole 400 mg Q 12h with efavirenz 300 mg Q24h, decreased voriconazole AUCτ by 7% (90% CI: -23%, 13%) and increased Cmax by 23% (90% CI: -1%, 53%); efavirenz AUCτ was increased by 17% (90% CI: 6%, 29%) and Cmax was equivalent.
Voriconazole may be coadministered with efavirenz if the voriconazole maintenance
dose is increased to 400 mg Q12h and the efavirenz dose is decreased to 300
mg Q24h. When treatment with voriconazole is stopped, the initial dosage of
efavirenz should be restored.
Phenytoin (CYP2C9 substrate and potent CYP450 inducer): Repeat
dose administration of phenytoin (300 mg once daily) decreased the steady state
Cmax and AUCτ of orally administered voriconazole (200 mg Q12h
x 14 days) by an average of 50% and 70%, respectively, in healthy subjects.
Administration of a higher voriconazole dose (400 mg Q12h x 7 days) with phenytoin
(300 mg once daily) resulted in comparable steady state voriconazole Cmax and
AUCτ estimates as compared to when voriconazole was given at
200 mg Q12h without phenytoin.
Phenytoin may be coadministered with voriconazole if the maintenance dose of
voriconazole is increased from 4 mg/kg to 5 mg/kg intravenously every 12 hours
or from 200 mg to 400 mg orally, every 12 hours (100 mg to 200 mg orally, every
12 hours in patients less than 40 kg) (see DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION).
Repeat dose administration of voriconazole (400 mg Q12h x 10 days) increased
the steady state Cmax and AUCτ of phenytoin (300 mg once daily)
by an average of 70% and 80%, respectively, in healthy subjects. The increase
in phenytoin Cmax and AUC when coadministered with voriconazole may be expected
to be as high as 2 times the Cmax and AUC estimates when phenytoin is given
without voriconazole. Therefore, frequent monitoring of plasma phenytoin concentrations
and phenytoin-related adverse effects is recommended when phenytoin is coadministered
with voriconazole (see PRECAUTIONS: DRUG INTERACTIONS).
Omeprazole (CYP2C19 inhibitor; CYP2C19 and CYP3A4 substrate): Coadministration
of omeprazole (40 mg once daily x 10 days) with oral voriconazole (400 mg Q12h
x 1 day, then 200 mg Q12h x 9 days) increased the steady state Cmax and AUCτ
of voriconazole by an average of 15% (90% CI: 5%, 25%) and 40% (90% CI: 29%,
55%), respectively, in healthy subjects. No dosage adjustment of voriconazole
is recommended.
Coadministration of voriconazole (400 mg Q12h x 1 day, then 200 mg x 6 days)
with omeprazole (40 mg once daily x 7 days) to healthy subjects significantly
increased the steady state Cmax and AUCτ of omeprazole an average
of 2 times (90% CI: 1.8, 2.6) and 4 times (90% CI: 3.3, 4.4), respectively,
as compared to when omeprazole is given without voriconazole. When initiating
voriconazole in patients already receiving omeprazole doses of 40 mg or greater,
it is recommended that the omeprazole dose be reduced by one-half (see PRECAUTIONS:
DRUG INTERACTIONS).
The metabolism of other proton pump inhibitors that are CYP2C19 substrates may also be inhibited by voriconazole and may result in increased plasma concentrations of these drugs.
Oral Contraceptives (CYP3A4 substrate; CYP2C19 inhibitor): Coadministration
of oral voriconazole (400 mg Q12h for 1 day, then 200 mg Q12h for 3 days) and
oral contraceptive (Ortho-Novum1/35® consisting of 35 mcg ethinyl estradiol
and 1 mg norethindrone, Q24h) to healthy female subjects at steady state increased
the Cmax and AUCτ of ethinyl estradiol by an average of 36% (90%
CI: 28%, 45%) and 61% (90% CI: 50%, 72%), respectively, and that of norethindrone
by 15% (90% CI: 3%, 28%) and 53% (90% CI: 44%, 63%), respectively in healthy
subjects. Voriconazole Cmax and AUCτ increased by an average
of 14% (90% CI: 3%, 27%)and 46% (90% CI: 32%, 61%), respectively. Monitoring
for adverse events related to oral contraceptives, in addition to those for
voriconazole, is recommended during coadministration (see PRECAUTIONS: DRUG
INTERACTIONS).
No significant pharmacokinetic interaction was seen and no dosage adjustment
of these drugs is recommended:
Indinavir (CYP3A4 inhibitor and substrate): Repeat dose administration
of indinavir (800 mg TID for 10 days) had no significant effect on voriconazole
Cmax and AUC following repeat dose administration (200 mg Q12h for 17 days)
in healthy subjects.
Repeat dose administration of voriconazole (200 mg Q12h for 7 days) did not have a significant effect on steady state Cmax and AUCτ of indinavir following repeat dose administration (800 mg TID for 7 days) in healthy subjects.
Other Two-Way Interactions Expected to be Significant Based on In Vitro
and In Vivo Findings:
Other HIV Protease Inhibitors (CYP3A4 substrates and inhibitors):
In vitro studies (human liver microsomes) suggest that voriconazole may
inhibit the metabolism of HIV protease inhibitors (e.g., saquinavir, amprenavir
and nelfinavir). In vitro studies (human liver microsomes) also show
that the metabolism of voriconazole may be inhibited by HIV protease inhibitors
(e.g., saquinavir and amprenavir). Patients should be frequently monitored for
drug toxicity during the coadministration of voriconazole and HIV protease inhibitors
(see PRECAUTIONS: DRUG INTERACTIONS).
Other Non-Nucleoside Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors (NNRTIs)
(CYP3A4 substrates, inhibitors or CYP450 inducers): In vitro studies
(human liver microsomes) show that the metabolism of voriconazole may be inhibited
by a NNRTI (e.g., delavirdine). The findings of a clinical voriconazole-efavirenz
drug interaction study in healthy male subjects suggest that the metabolism
of voriconazole may be induced by a NNRTI. This in vivo study also showed
that voriconazole may inhibit the metabolism of a NNRTI (see CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY
- Drug Interactions, PRECAUTIONS: DRUG INTERACTIONS).
Patients should be frequently monitored for drug toxicity during the coadministration
of voriconazole and other NNRTIs (e.g., nevirapine and delavirdine) (see PRECAUTIONS:
DRUG INTERACTIONS). Dose adjustments are required
when voriconazole is co-administered with efavirenz (see CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY
- Drug Interactions, PRECAUTIONS: DRUG INTERACTIONS).
Microbiology
Mechanism of Action
Voriconazole is a triazole antifungal agent. The primary mode of action of voriconazole is the inhibition of fungal cytochrome P-450-mediated 14 alpha-lanosterol demethylation, an essential step in fungal ergosterol biosynthesis. The accumulation of 14 alpha-methyl sterols correlates with the subsequent loss of ergosterol in the fungal cell wall and may be responsible for the antifungal activity of voriconazole. Voriconazole has been shown to be more selective for fungal cytochrome P-450 enzymes than for various mammalian cytochrome P-450 enzyme systems.
Activity In Vitro
Voriconazole has been shown to be active against most strains of the following
microorganisms, both in vitro and in clinical infections.
Aspergillus fumigatus
Aspergillus flavus
Aspergillus niger
Aspergillus terreus
Candida albicans
Candida glabrata (In clinical studies, the voriconazole MIC90
was 4 µg/mL)*
Candida krusei
Candida parapsilosis
Candida tropicalis
Fusarium spp. including Fusarium solani
Scedosporium apiospermum
*In clinical studies, voriconazole MIC90 for C. glabrata
baseline isolates was 4 µg/mL; 13/50 (26%) C. glabrata baseline isolates
were resistant (MIC ≥ 4 µg/mL) to voriconazole. However, based on 1054 isolates
tested in surveillance studies the MIC90 was 1 µg/mL (see Table
4).
The following data are available, but their clinical significance is unknown.
Voriconazole exhibits in vitro minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs)
of 1 µg/mL or less against most ( ≥ 90%) isolates of the following microorganisms;
however, the safety and effectiveness of voriconazole in treating clinical infections
due to these Candida species have not been established in adequate and
well-controlled clinical trials:
Candida lusitaniae
Candida guilliermondii
Susceptibility Testing Methods2,3
Aspergillus species and other filamentous fungi
No interpretive criteria have been established for Aspergillus species
and other filamentous fungi.
Candida species
The interpretive standards for voriconazole against Candida species
are applicable only to tests performed using Clinical Laboratory and Standards
Institute (CLSI) microbroth dilution reference method M27 for MIC read at 48
hours or disk diffusion reference method M44 for zone diameter read at 24 hours.2,3
Broth Microdilution Techniques: Quantitative methods are used
to determine antifungal minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs). These MICs
provide estimates of the susceptibility of Candida spp. to antifungal
agents. MICs should be determined using a standardized procedure at 48 hours.2
Standardized procedures are based on a microdilution method (broth) with standardized
inoculum concentrations and standardized concentrations of voriconazole powder.
The MIC values should be interpreted according to the criteria provided in Table
4.
Diffusion Techniques: Qualitative methods that require measurement
of zone diameters also provide reproducible estimates of the susceptibility
of Candida spp. to an antifungal agent. One such standardized procedure
requires the use of standardized inoculum concentrations.3 This procedure
uses paper disks impregnated with 1 µg of voriconazole to test the susceptibility
of yeasts to voriconazole at 24 hours. Disk diffusion interpretive criteria
are also provided in Table 4.
Table 4: Susceptibility Interpretive Criteria for Voriconazole2,3
| |
Broth Microdilution at 48 hours (MIC in µg/mL) |
Disk Diffusion at 24 hours (Zone diameters in mm) |
| |
Susceptible (S) |
Intermediate (I) |
Resistant (R) |
Susceptible (S) |
Intermediate (I) |
Resistant (R) |
| Voriconazole |
≤ 1.0 |
2.0 |
≥ 4.0 |
≥ 17 |
14-16 |
≤ 13 |
NOTE: Shown are the breakpoints (µg/mL) for voriconazole against
Candida species.
The susceptible category implies that isolates are inhibited by the usually achievable concentrations of antifungal agent tested when the recommended dosage is used for the site of infection. The intermediate category implies that an infection due to the isolate may be appropriately treated in body sites where the drugs are physiologically concentrated or when a high dosage of drug is used. The resistant category implies that isolates are not inhibited by the usually achievable concentrations of the agent with normal dosage schedules and clinical efficacy of the agent against the isolate has not been reliably shown in treatment studies.
Quality Control
Standardized susceptibility test procedures require the use of quality control organisms to control the technical aspects of the test procedures. Standard voriconazole powder and 1 µg disks should provide the following range of values noted in Table 5.
NOTE: Quality control microorganisms are specific strains of organisms
with intrinsic biological properties relating to resistance mechanisms and their
genetic expression within fungi; the specific strains used for microbiological
control are not clinically significant.
Table 5: Acceptable Quality Control Ranges for Voriconazole
to be used in Validation of Susceptibility Test Results
| QC Strain |
Broth Microdilution (MIC in µg/mL) @ 48-hour |
Disk Diffusion (Zone diameter in mm) @ 24-
hour |
Candida parapsilosis
ATCC 22019 |
0.03-0.25 |
28-37 |
Candida krusei
ATCC 6258 |
0.12-1.0 |
16-25 |
Candida albicans
ATCC 90028 |
* |
31-42 |
| * Quality control ranges have not been established for this
strain/antifungal agent combination due to their extensive inter laboratory
variation during initial quality control studies. |
ATCC is a registered trademark of the American Type Culture Collection.
Activity In Vivo
Voriconazole was active in normal and/or immunocompromised guinea pigs with
systemic and/or pulmonary infections due to A. fumigatus (including an
isolate with reduced susceptibility to itraconazole) or Candida species
[C.albicans (including an isolate with reduced susceptibility to fluconazole),
C. krusei and C. glabrata] in which the endpoints were prolonged
survival of infected animals and/or reduction of mycological burden from target
organs. In one experiment, voriconazole exhibited activity against Scedosporium
apiospermum infections in immune competent guinea pigs.
Drug Resistance
Voriconazole drug resistance development has not been adequately studied in
vitro against Candida, Aspergillus, Scedosporium and Fusarium
species. The frequency of drug resistance development for the various fungi
for which this drug is indicated is not known.
Fungal isolates exhibiting reduced susceptibility to fluconazole or itraconazole
may also show reduced susceptibility to voriconazole, suggesting cross-resistance
can occur among these azoles. The relevance of cross-resistance and clinical
outcome has not been fully characterized. Clinical cases where azole cross-resistance
is demonstrated may require alternative antifungal therapy.
Clinical Studies
Voriconazole, administered orally or parenterally, has been evaluated as primary
or salvage therapy in 520 patients aged 12 years and older with infections caused
by Aspergillus spp., Fusarium spp., and Scedosporium spp.
Invasive Aspergillosis
Voriconazole was studied in patients for primary therapy of invasive aspergillosis (randomized, controlled study 307/602), for primary and salvage therapy of aspergillosis (non-comparative study 304) and for treatment of patients with invasive aspergillosis who were refractory to, or intolerant of, other antifungal therapy (non-comparative study 309/604).
Study 307/602
The efficacy of voriconazole compared to amphotericin B in the primary treatment of acute invasive aspergillosis was demonstrated in 277 patients treated for 12 weeks in Study 307/602. The majority of study patients had underlying hematologic malignancies, including bone marrow transplantation. The study also included patients with solid organ transplantation, solid tumors, and AIDS. The patients were mainly treated for definite or probable invasive aspergillosis of the lungs. Other aspergillosis infections included disseminated disease, CNS infections and sinus infections. Diagnosis of definite or probable invasive aspergillosis was made according to criteria modified from those established by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Mycoses Study Group/European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (NIAID MSG/EORTC).
Voriconazole was administered intravenously with a loading dose of 6 mg/kg every 12 hours for the first 24 hours followed by a maintenance dose of 4 mg/kg every 12 hours for a minimum of seven days. Therapy could then be switched to the oral formulation at a dose of 200 mg Q12h. Median duration of IV voriconazole therapy was 10 days (range 2-90 days). After IV voriconazole therapy, the median duration of PO voriconazole therapy was 76 days (range 2-232 days).
Patients in the comparator group received conventional amphotericin B as a
slow infusion at a daily dose of 1.0-1.5 mg/kg/day. Median duration of IV amphotericin
therapy was 12 days (range 1-85 days). Treatment was then continued with other
licensed antifungal therapy (OLAT), including itraconazole and lipid amphotericin
B formulations. Although initial therapy with conventional amphotericin B was
to be continued for at least two weeks, actual duration of therapy was at the
discretion of the investigator. Patients who discontinued initial randomized
therapy due to toxicity or lack of efficacy were eligible to continue in the
study with OLAT treatment.
A satisfactory global response at 12 weeks (complete or partial resolution of all attributable symptoms, signs, radiographic/bronchoscopic abnormalities present at baseline) was seen in 53% of voriconazole treated patients compared to 32% of amphotericin B treated patients (Table 6). A benefit of voriconazole compared to amphotericin B on patient survival at Day 84 was seen with a 71% survival rate on voriconazole compared to 58% on amphotericin B (Table 6).
Table 6 also summarizes the response (success) based on mycological confirmation and species.
Table 6: Overall Efficacy and Success by Species in the Primary
Treatment of Acute Invasive Aspergillosis Study 307/602
| |
Voriconazole |
Ampho B c |
Stratified Difference
(95% CI) d |
| n/N (%) |
n/N (%) |
|
| Efficacy as PrimaryTherapy |
| Satisfactory Global Response a |
76/144 (53) |
42/133 (32) |
21.8%
(10.5%, 33.0%) p<0.0001 |
| Survival at Day 84 b |
102/144 (71) |
77/133 (58) |
13.1%
(2.1%, 24.2%) |
| |
|
|
|
| Success by Species |
| Success n/N (%) |
| Overall success |
76/144 (53) |
42/133 (32) |
|
| Mycologically confirmed e |
37/84 (44) |
16/67 (24) |
|
| Aspergillus spp.f |
|
|
|
| A. fumigatus |
28/63 (44) |
12/47 (26) |
|
| A. flavus |
3/6 |
4/9 |
|
| A. terreus |
2/3 |
0/3 |
|
| A. niger |
1/4 |
0/9 |
|
| A. nidulans |
1/1 |
0/0 |
|
a Assessed by independent Data
Review Committee (DRC)
b Proportion of subjects alive
c Amphotericin B followed by other licensed antifungal therapy
d Difference and corresponding 95% confidence interval are
stratified by protocol
e Not all mycologically confirmed specimens were speciated
f Some patients had more than one species isolated at baseline |
Study 304
The results of this comparative trial (Study 307/602) confirmed the results
of an earlier trial in the primary and salvage treatment of patients with acute
invasive aspergillosis (Study 304). In this earlier study, an overall success
rate of 52% (26/50) was seen in patients treated with voriconazole for primary
therapy. Success was seen in 17/29 (59%) with Aspergillus fumigatus infections
and 3/6 (50%) patients with infections due to non-fumigatus species [A.
flavus (1/1); A. nidulans (0/2); A. niger (2/2); A. terreus
(0/1)]. Success in patients who received voriconazole as salvage therapy is
presented in Table 7.
Study 309/604
Additional data regarding response rates in patients who were refractory to,
or intolerant of, other antifungal agents are also provided in Table 7. Overall
mycological eradication for culture-documented infections due to fumigatus
and non-fumigatus species of Aspergillus was 36/82 (44%) and 12/30
(40%), respectively, in voriconazole treated patients. Patients had various
underlying diseases and species other than A. fumigatus contributed to
mixed infections in some cases.
For patients who were infected with a single pathogen and were refractory to, or intolerant of, other antifungal agents, the satisfactory response rates for voriconazole in studies 304 and 309/604 are presented in Table 7.
Table 7: Combined Response Data in Salvage Patients with
Single Aspergillus Species (Studies 304 and 309/604)
| |
Success n/N |
| A. fumigatus |
43/97 (44%) |
| A. flavus |
5/12 |
| A. nidulans |
1/3 |
| A. niger |
4/5 |
| A. terreus |
3/8 |
| A. versicolor |
0/1 |
Nineteen patients had more than one species of Aspergillus isolated.
Success was seen in 4/17 (24%) of these patients.
Candidemia in nonneutropenic patients and other deep tissue Candida
infections Voriconazole was compared to the regimen of amphotericin B followed
by fluconazole in Study 608, an open label, comparative study in nonneutropenic
patients with candidemia associated with clinical signs of infection. Patients
were randomized in 2:1 ratio to receive either voriconazole (n=283) or the regimen
of amphotericin B followed by fluconazole (n=139).
Patients were treated with randomized study drug for a median of 15 days. Most
of the candidemia in patients evaluated for efficacy was caused by C. albicans
(46%), followed by C. tropicalis (19%), C. parapsilosis (17%),
C. glabrata (15%), and C. krusei (1%).
An independent Data Review Committee (DRC), blinded to study treatment, reviewed
the clinical and mycological data from this study, and generated one assessment
of response for each patient. A successful response required all of the following:
resolution or improvement in all clinical signs and symptoms of infection, blood
cultures negative for Candida, infected deep tissue sites negative for
Candida or resolution of all local signs of infection, and no systemic
antifungal therapy other than study drug. The primary analysis, which counted
DRC-assessed successes at the fixed time point (12 weeks after End of Therapy
[EOT]), demonstrated that voriconazole was comparable to the regimen of amphotericin
B followed by fluconazole (response rates of 41% and 41%, respectively) in the
treatment of candidemia. Patients who did not have a 12-week assessment for
any reason were considered a treatment failure.
The overall clinical and mycological success rates by Candida species
in Study 150-608 are presented in Table 8.
Table 8: Overall Success Rates Sustained From EOT To The
Fixed 12-Week Follow-Up Time Point By Baseline Pathogena,b
| Baseline Pathogen |
Clinical and Mycological Success (%) |
| Voriconazole |
Amphotericin B --> Fluconazole |
| C. albicans |
46/107 (43%) |
30/63 (48%) |
| C. tropicalis |
17/53 (32%) |
1/16 (6%) |
| C. parapsilosis |
24/45 (53%) |
10/19 (53%) |
| C. glabrata |
12/36 (33%) |
7/21 (33%) |
| C. krusei |
1/4 |
0/1 |
aA few patients had more thanone pathogen at baseline.
bPatients who did not have a 12-week assessment for any reason
were considered a treatment failure. |
In a secondary analysis, which counted DRC-assessed successes at any time point (EOT, or 2, 6, or 12 weeks after EOT), the response rates were 65% for voriconazole and 71% for the regimen of amphotericin B followed by fluconazole.
In Studies 608 and 309/604 (non-comparative study in patients with invasive
fungal infections who were refractory to, or intolerant of, other antifungal
agents), voriconazole was evaluated in 35 patients with deep tissue Candida
infections. A favorable response was seen in 4 of 7 patients with intraabdominal
infections, 5 of 6 patients with kidney and bladder wall infections, 3 of 3
patients with deep tissue abscess or wound infection, 1 of 2 patients with pneumonia/pleural
space infections, 2 of 4 patients with skin lesions, 1 of 1 patients with mixed
intraabdominal and pulmonary infection, 1 of 2 patients with suppurative phlebitis,
1 of 3 patients with hepatosplenic infection, 1 of 5 patients with osteomyelitis,
0 of 1 with liver infection, and 0 of 1 with cervical lymph node infection.
Esophageal Candidiasis
The efficacy of oral voriconazole 200 mg bid compared to oral fluconazole 200 mg od in the primary treatment of esophageal candidiasis was demonstrated in Study 150-305, a double-blind, double-dummy study in immunocompromised patients with endoscopically-proven esophageal candidiasis. Patients were treated for a median of 15 days (range 1 to 49 days). Outcome was assessed by repeat endoscopy at end of treatment (EOT). A successful response was defined as a normal endoscopy at EOT or at least a 1 grade improvement over baseline endoscopic score. For patients in the Intent to Treat (ITT) population with only a baseline endoscopy, a successful response was defined as symptomatic cure or improvement at EOT compared to baseline.Voriconazole and fluconazole (200 mg od) showed comparable efficacy rates against esophageal candidiasis, as presented in Table 9.
Table 9: Success Rates in Patients Treated for Esophageal
Candidiasis
| Population |
Voriconazole |
Fluconazole |
Difference %
(95% CI)a |
| PPb |
113/115 (98.2%) |
134/141 (95.0%) |
3.2 (-1.1, 7.5) |
| ITTc |
175/200 (87.5%) |
171/191 (89.5%) |
-2.0 (-8.3, 4.3) |
aConfidence Interval for the difference (Voriconazole
-Fluconazole) in success rates.
b PP (Per Protocol) patients had confirmation of Candida
esophagitis by endoscopy, received at least 12 days of treatment, and hada
repeat endoscopy atEOT (end of treatment).
c ITT (Intent to Treat) patients without endoscopy or clinical
assessment at EOT were treated as failures. |
Microbiologic success rates by Candida species are presented in Table
10.
Table 10: Clinical and mycological outcome by baseline pathogen
in patients with esophageal candidiasis (Study 150-305).
| Pathogena |
Voriconazole |
Fluconazole |
| Favorable endoscopic responseb |
Mycological eradicationb |
Favorable endoscopic responseb |
Mycological eradicationb |
| Success/Total (%) |
Eradication/Total (%) |
Success/Total (%) |
Eradication/Total (%) |
| C. albicans |
134/140 (96%) |
90/107 (84%) |
147/156 (94%) |
91/115 (79%) |
| C. glabrata |
8/8 (100%) |
4/7 (57%) |
4/4 (100%) |
1/4 (25%) |
| C. krusei |
1/1 |
1/1 |
2/2 (100%) |
0/0 |
a Some patients had more than one species isolated
at baseline
bPatients with endoscopic and/or mycological assessment at end
of therapy |
Other Serious Fungal Pathogens
In pooled analyses of patients, voriconazole was shown to be effective against the following additional fungal pathogens:
Scedosporium apiospermum - Successful response to voriconazole therapy
was seen in 15 of 24 patients (63%). Three of these patients relapsed within
4 weeks, including 1 patient with pulmonary, skin and eye infections, 1 patient
with cerebral disease, and 1 patient with skin infection. Ten patients had evidence
of cerebral disease and 6 of these had a successful outcome (1 relapse). In
addition, a successful response was seen in 1 of 3 patients with mixed organism
infections.
Fusarium spp. - Nine of 21 (43%) patients were successfully treated
with voriconazole. Of these 9 patients, 3 had eye infections, 1 had an eye and
blood infection, 1 had a skin infection, 1 had a blood infection alone, 2 had
sinus infections, and 1 had disseminated infection (pulmonary, skin, hepatosplenic).
Three of these patients (1 with disseminated disease, 1 with an eye infection
and 1 with a blood infection) had Fusarium solani and were complete successes.
Two of these patients relapsed, 1 with a sinus infection and profound neutropenia
and 1 post surgical patient with blood and eye infections.
REFERENCES
1. Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute. Reference method for broth dilution
antifungal susceptibility testing of conidium-forming filamentous fungi. Approved
Standard M38-P. Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute, Villanova, Pa.
2. Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute. Reference method for broth dilution
antifungal susceptibility testing of yeasts. Approved Standard M27-A. Clinical
Laboratory Standards Institute, Villanova, Pa.
3. Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute. Method for antifungal disk diffusion
susceptibility testing of yeasts. Approved guideline M44-A. Clinical Laboratory
Standards Institute, Villanova, Pa.
Last updated on RxList: 8/22/2008