Mechanism of Action
Telavancin is an antibacterial drug.
Pharmacodynamics
The antimicrobial activity of telavancin appears to best
correlate with the ratio of area under the concentration-time curve to minimal
inhibitory concentration (AUC/MIC) for Staphylococcus aureus based on
animal models of infection. An exposure-response analysis of 2 cSSSI clinical
trials supports the dose of 10 mg/kg every 24 hours.
Cardiac Electrophysiology
The effect of telavancin on cardiac repolarization was
assessed in a randomized, double-blind, multiple-dose, positive-controlled, and
placebo-controlled, parallel study (n=160). Healthy subjects received VIBATIV
7.5 mg/kg, VIBATIV 15 mg/kg, positive control, or placebo infused over 60
minutes once daily for 3 days. Based on interpolation of the data from VIBATIV
7.5 mg/kg and 15 mg/kg, the mean maximum baseline-corrected, placebo-corrected
QTc prolongation at the end of infusion was estimated to be 12-15 msec for
VIBATIV 10 mg/kg and 22 msec for the positive control (Table 5). By 1 hour
after infusion the maximum QTc prolongation was 6-9 msec for VIBATIV and 15
msec for the positive control.
Table 5 : Mean and Maximum QTcF Changes from Baseline Relative
to Placebo
| |
QTcF1 Change from Baseline |
Mean
(Upper 90% Confidence Limit2)
msec |
Maximum
(Upper 90% Confidence Limit)
msec |
| VIBATIV 7.5 mg/kg |
4.1 (7) |
11.6 (16) |
| VIBATIV 15 mg/kg |
4.6 (8) |
15.1 (20) |
| Positive Control |
9.5 (13) |
21.6 (26) |
1 Fridericia corrected
2 Upper CL from a 2-sided 90% CI on difference from placebo
(msec) |
ECGs were performed prior to and during the treatment period in patients receiving
VIBATIV 10 mg/kg in 3 studies to monitor QTc intervals. In these trials, 214
of 1029 (21%) patients allocated to treatment with VIBATIV and 164 of 1033 (16%)
allocated to vancomycin received concomitant medications known to prolong the
QTc interval and are known to be associated with definite or possible risk of
torsades de pointes. The incidence of QTc prolongation > 60 msec was 1.5%
(15 patients) in the VIBATIV group and 0.6% (6 patients) in the vancomycin group.
Nine of the 15 VIBATIV patients received concomitant medications known to prolong
the QTc interval and definitely or possibly associated with a risk of torsades
de pointes, compared with 1 of the 6 patients who received vancomycin. A similar
number of patients in each treatment group ( < 1%) who did not receive a concomitant
medication known to prolong the QTc interval experienced a prolongation > 60
msec from baseline. In a separate analysis, 1 patient in the VIBATIV group and
2 patients in the vancomycin group experienced QTc > 500 msec. No cardiac
adverse events were ascribed to prolongation of the QTc interval.
Pharmacokinetics
The mean pharmacokinetic parameters of telavancin (10mg/kg)
after a single and multiple 60-minute intravenous infusions (10 mg/kg every 24
hours) are summarized in Table 6.
Table 6: Pharmacokinetic Parameters of Telavancin in Healthy
Adults, 10 mg/kg
| |
Single Dose |
Multiple Dose |
| (n=42) |
(n=36) |
| Cmax(mcg/mL) |
93.6 ± 14.2 |
108 ± 26 |
| AUC0-∞ (mcg• hr/mL) |
747 ± 129 |
--1 |
| AUC0-24h (mcg•hr/mL) |
666 ± 107 |
780 ± 125 |
| t½(hr) |
8.0 ± 1.5 |
8.1 ± 1.5 |
| Cl(mL/hr/kg) |
13.9 ± 2.9 |
13.1 ± 2.0 |
| Vss(mL/kg) |
145 ± 23 |
133 ± 24 |
Cmax maximum plasma concentration
AUC area under concentration-time course
t½ terminal elimination half-life
Cl clearance
Vss apparent volume of distribution at steady state
1Data not available |
In healthy young adults, the pharmacokinetics of telavancin
administered intravenously were linear following single doses from 5 to 12.5
mg/kg and multiple doses from 7.5 to 15 mg/kg administered once-daily for up to
7 days. Steady-state concentrations were achieved by the third daily dose.
Distribution
Telavancin binds to human plasma proteins, primarily to
serum albumin, in a concentration-independent manner. The mean binding is
approximately 90% and is not affected by renal or hepatic impairment.
Concentrations of telavancin in skin blister fluid were 40%
of those in plasma (AUC0-24hr ratio) after 3 daily doses of 7.5
mg/kg VIBATIV in healthy young adults.
Metabolism
No metabolites of telavancin were detected in in vitro
studies using human liver microsomes, liver slices, hepatocytes, and kidney S9
fraction. None of the following recombinant CYP 450 isoforms were shown to
metabolize telavancin in human liver microsomes: CYP 1A2, 2C9, 2C19, 2D6, 3A4,
3A5, 4A11. The clearance of telavancin is not expected to be altered by
inhibitors of any of these enzymes.
In a mass balance study in male subjects using radiolabeled
telavancin, 3 hydroxylated metabolites were identified with the predominant
metabolite (THRX-651540) accounting for < 10% of the radioactivity in urine
and < 2% of the radioactivity in plasma. The metabolic pathway for telavancin
has not been identified.
Excretion
Telavancin is primarily eliminated by the kidney. In a mass
balance study, approximately 76% of the administered dose was recovered from
urine and < 1% of the dose was recovered from feces (collected up to 216
hours) based on total radioactivity.
Specific Populations
Geriatric Patients
The impact of age on the pharmacokinetics of telavancin was evaluated in healthy
young (range 21-42 years) and elderly (range 65-83 years) subjects. The mean
CrCl of elderly subjects was 66 mL/min. Age alone did not have a clinically
meaningful impact on the pharmacokinetics of telavancin [see Use
in Specific Populations].
Pediatric Patients
The pharmacokinetics of telavancin in patients less than 18
years of age have not been studied.
Gender
The impact of gender on the pharmacokinetics of telavancin
was evaluated in healthy male (n=8) and female (n=8) subjects. The
pharmacokinetics of telavancin were similar in males and females. No dosage
adjustment is recommended based on gender.
Renal Impairment
The pharmacokinetics of telavancin were evaluated in
subjects with normal and subjects with varying degrees of renal impairment
following administration of a single dose of telavancin 7.5 mg/kg (n=28). The
mean AUC0-∞- values were approximately 13%, 29%, and 118%
higher for subjects with CrCl > 50 to 80 mL/min, CrCl 30 to 50 mL/min, and
CrCl ≤ 30 mL/min, respectively, compared to subjects with normal renal
function. Dosage adjustment is required in patients with CrCl ≤ 50 mL/min
[see DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION].
Creatinine clearance was estimated from serum creatinine
based on the Cockcroft-Gault formula:
CrCl = [140 – age (years)] x ideal body weight (kg)* /[72 x
serum creatinine (mg/dL)] {x 0.85 for female patients}
*Use actual body weight if < ideal body weight (IBW)
IBW (male) = 50 kg + 0.9 kg/cm over 152 cm height
IBW (female) = 45.5 kg + 0.9 kg/cm over 152 cm height
Following administration of a single dose of VIBATIV 7.5
mg/kg to subjects with end-stage renal disease, approximately 5.9% of the
administered dose of telavancin was recovered in the dialysate following 4
hours of hemodialysis. The effects of peritoneal dialysis have not been studied.
Following a single intravenous dose of VIBATIV 7.5 mg/kg,
the clearance of hydroxypropyl-beta-cyclodextrin was reduced in subjects with
renal impairment, resulting in a higher exposure to
hydroxypropyl-beta-cyclodextrin. In subjects with mild, moderate, and severe
renal impairment, the mean clearance values were 38%, 59%, and 82% lower,
respectively, compared to subjects with normal renal function. Multiple
infusions of VIBATIV may result in accumulation of
hydroxypropyl-beta-cyclodextrin.
Hepatic Impairment
The pharmacokinetics of telavancin were not altered in
subjects with moderate hepatic impairment (n= 8, Child-Pugh B) compared to
healthy subjects with normal hepatic function matched for gender, age, and
weight. The pharmacokinetics of telavancin have not been evaluated in patients
with severe hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh C).
Drug Interactions
In Vitro
The inhibitory activity of telavancin against the following
CYP 450 enzymes was evaluated in human liver microsomes: CYP 1A2, 2C9, 2C19,
2D6, and 3A4/5. Telavancin inhibited CYP 3A4/5 at potentially clinically
relevant concentrations. Upon further evaluation in a Phase 1 clinical trial,
telavancin was found not to inhibit the metabolism of midazolam, a sensitive
CYP3A substrate (see below).
Midazolam
The impact of telavancin on the pharmacokinetics of
midazolam (CYP 3A4/5 substrate) was evaluated in 16 healthy adult subjects
following administration of a single dose of VIBATIV 10 mg/kg, intravenous
midazolam 1 mg, and both. The results showed that telavancin had no impact on
the pharmacokinetics of midazolam and midazolam had no effect on the
pharmacokinetics of telavancin. Therefore, telavancin is unlikely to alter the
pharmacokinetics of drugs metabolized by the CYP450 system to a clinically significant
degree.
Aztreonam
The impact of telavancin on the pharmacokinetics of
aztreonam was evaluated in 11 healthy adult subjects following administration
of a single dose of VIBATIV 10 mg/kg, aztreonam 2 gm, and both. Telavancin had
no impact on the pharmacokinetics of aztreonam and aztreonam had no effect on
the pharmacokinetics of telavancin. No dosage adjustment of telavancin or
aztreonam is recommended when both drugs are coadministered.
Piperacillin-tazobactam
The impact of telavancin on the pharmacokinetics of
piperacillin-tazobactam was evaluated in 12 healthy adult subjects following
administration of a single dose of VIBATIV 10 mg/kg, piperacillin-tazobactam
4.5 g, and both. Telavancin had no impact on the pharmacokinetics of piperacillin-tazobactam
and piperacillin-tazobactam had no effect on the pharmacokinetics of
telavancin. No dosage adjustment of telavancin or piperacillin-tazobactam is
recommended when both drugs are coadministered.
Microbiology
Telavancin is a semisynthetic, lipoglycopeptide antibiotic.
Telavancin exerts concentration-dependent, bactericidal activity against
Gram-positive organisms in vitro, as demonstrated by time-kill assays and
MBC/MIC (minimum bactericidal concentration/minimum inhibitory concentration)
ratios using broth dilution methodology. In vitro studies demonstrated a
telavancin post-antibiotic effect ranging from 1 to 6 hours against S.
aureus and other Gram-positive pathogens.
Although telavancin is approximately 90% protein bound, the
presence of human serum or human serum albumin has minimal impact on the in vitro activity of telavancin against staphylococci, streptococci, and
vancomycin-susceptible enterococci.
Mechanism of Action
Telavancin inhibits bacterial cell wall synthesis by
interfering with the polymerization and cross-linking of peptidoglycan.
Telavancin binds to the bacterial membrane and disrupts membrane barrier
function.
Interactions with Other Antibacterials
In vitro investigations demonstrated no antagonism between
telavancin and amikacin, aztreonam, cefepime, ceftriaxone, ciprofloxacin,
gentamicin, imipenem, meropenem, oxacillin, piperacillin/tazobactam, rifampin,
and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, when tested in various combinations against
telavancin susceptible staphylococci, streptococci, and enterococci. This
information is not available for other bacteria.
Cross-Resistance
Some vancomycin-resistant enterococci have a reduced
susceptibility to telavancin. There is no known cross-resistance between
telavancin and other classes of antibiotics.
Antibacterial Activity
Telavancin has been shown to be active against most isolates
of the following microorganisms both in vitro and in clinical infections as
described in the Indications and Usage section [see INDICATIONS AND USAGE]:
Facultative Gram-Positive Microorganisms
Staphylococcus aureus (including methicillin-resistant isolates)
Streptococcus pyogenes
Enterococcus faecalis (vancomycin-susceptible isolates only)
Streptococcus agalactiae
Streptococcus anginosus group (includes S. anginosus, S. intermedius,
and S. constellatus)
Greater than 90% of the following microorganisms exhibit an
in vitro MIC less than or equal to the telavancin-susceptible breakpoint for
organisms of similar genus shown in Table 7. The safety and effectiveness of
telavancin in treating clinical infections due to these microorganisms have not
been established in adequate and well-controlled clinical trials.
Facultative Gram-Positive Microorganisms
Enterococcus faecium (vancomycin-susceptible isolates only)
Staphylococcus haemolyticus
Streptococcus dysgalactaie subsp. equisimilis
Staphylococcus epidermidis
Susceptibility Test Methods
When available, the clinical microbiology laboratory should
provide cumulative results of the in vitro susceptibility test results for
antimicrobial drugs used in local hospitals and practice areas to the physician
as periodic reports that describe the susceptibility profile of nosocomial and
community-acquired pathogens. These reports should aid the physician in selecting
the most effective antimicrobial.
Dilution technique
Quantitative methods are used to determine antimicrobial
minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs). These MICs provide estimates of the
susceptibility of bacteria to antimicrobial compounds. The MICs should be
determined using a standardized procedure [see References]. Standardized
procedures are based on a dilution method (broth or agar) or equivalent with
standardized inoculum concentrations and standardized concentrations of
telavancin powder. The MIC values should be interpreted according to the
criteria provided in Table 7.
Diffusion technique
Quantitative methods that require measurement of zone
diameters also provide reproducible estimates of the susceptibility of bacteria
to antimicrobial compounds. One such standardized procedure requires the use of
standardized inoculum concentrations [see References]. This procedure
uses paper disks impregnated with 30 mcg of telavancin to test the
susceptibility of microorganisms to telavancin. The disk diffusion interpretive
criteria are provided in Table 7.
Table 7 : Susceptibility Interpretive Criteria for Telavancin
| |
Susceptibility Interpretive Criteria1 |
Minimal inhibitory
concentration (mcg/mL) |
Disk Diffusion zone
diameter(mm) |
| S |
I |
R |
S |
I |
R |
| Staphylococcus aureus (including methicillin-resistant isolates) |
≤ 1 |
-- |
-- |
≥ 15 |
-- |
-- |
| Streptococcus pyogenes |
≤ 0.12 |
-- |
-- |
≥ 15 |
-- |
-- |
| Streptococcus agalactiae |
| Streptococcus anginosus group |
| Enterococcus faecalis (vancomycin-susceptible isolates only) |
≤ 1 |
-- |
-- |
≥ 15 |
-- |
-- |
| 1 The current absence of resistant
isolates precludes defining any results other than “susceptible”
Isolates yielding results other than susceptible should be subjected to
additional testing |
A report of “susceptible” indicates that the antimicrobial is likely to
inhibit growth of the pathogen if the antimicrobial compound in the blood reaches
the concentrations usually achievable.
Quality Control
Standardized susceptibility test procedures require the use
of laboratory control microorganisms to monitor the performance of the supplies
and reagents used in the assay, and the techniques of the individuals
performing the test. Standard telavancin powder should provide the range of
values noted in Table 8.
Quality control microorganisms are specific strains of
organisms with intrinsic biological properties relating to resistance
mechanisms and their genetic expression within bacteria; the specific strains
used for microbiological quality control are not clinically significant.
Table 8 : Acceptable Quality Control Ranges for Telavancin
to be used in Validation of Susceptibility Test Results
| |
Acceptable Quality Control Ranges |
Minimal Inhibitory
Concentration (mcg/mL) |
Disk Diffusion Zone
Diameter(mm) |
| Enterococcus faecalis ATCC 29212 |
0.12-0.5 |
Not applicable |
| Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 29213 |
0.12-1 |
Not applicable |
| Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 25923 |
Not applicable |
16-20 |
| Streptococcus pneumoniae ATCC 496191 |
0.004-0.03 |
17-24 |
| 1 This organism may be used for validation of
susceptibility test results when testing Streptococcus spp. other than
S. pneumoniae |
Animal Toxicology and/or Pharmacology
Two-week administration of telavancin in rats produced
minimal renal tubular vacuolization with no changes in BUN or creatinine. These
effects were not seen in studies conducted in dogs for similar duration. Four
weeks of treatment resulted in reversible elevations in BUN and/or creatinine
in association with renal tubular degeneration that further progressed
following 13 weeks of treatment.
These effects occurred at exposures (based on AUCs) that
were similar to those measured in clinical trials.
The potential effects of continuous venovenous
hemofiltration (CVVH) on the clearance of telavancin were examined in an in vitro model using bovine blood. Telavancin was cleared by CVVH and the
clearance of telavancin increased with increasing ultrafiltration rate [see OVERDOSAGE].
Clinical Trials
Complicated Skin and Skin Structure Infections
Adult patients with clinically documented complicated skin
and skin structure infections (cSSSI) were enrolled in two randomized,
multinational, multicenter, double-blinded trials (Trial 1 and Trial 2)
comparing VIBATIV (10 mg/kg IV every 24 hours) with vancomycin (1 g IV every 12
hours) for 7 to 14 days. Vancomycin dosages could be adjusted per site-specific
practice. Patients could receive concomitant aztreonam or metronidazole for
suspected Gram-negative and anaerobic infection, respectively. These trials
were identical in design, enrolling approximately 69% of their patients from
the United States.
The trials enrolled adult patients with cSSSI with suspected
or confirmed MRSA as the primary cause of infection. The all-treated efficacy
(ATe) population included all patients who received any amount of study
medication according to their randomized treatment group and were evaluated for
efficacy. The clinically evaluable population (CE) included patients in the ATe
population with sufficient adherence to the protocol.
The ATe population consisted of 1,794 patients. Of these,
1,410 (78.6%) patients were clinically evaluable (CE). Patients with
demographic and baseline characteristics were well-balanced between treatment
groups and are presented in Table 9.
Table 9 : Baseline Infection Types in Patients in Trials
1 and 2 – ATe Population
| |
VIBATIV
(N=884)1 |
Vancomycin
(N=910)1 |
| Type of infection |
| Major Abscess |
375 (42.4%) |
397 (43.6%) |
| Deep/Extensive Cellulitis |
309 (35.0%) |
337 (37.0%) |
| Wound Infection |
139 (15.7%) |
121 (13.3%) |
| Infected Ulcer |
45 (5.1%) |
46 (5.1%) |
| Infected Burn |
16 (1.8%) |
9 (1.0%) |
| 1Includes all patients randomized, treated, and
evaluated for efficacy |
The primary efficacy endpoints in both trials was the
clinical cure rates at a follow-up (Test of Cure) visit in the ATe and CE
populations. Clinical cure rates in Trials 1 and 2 are displayed for the ATe
and CE population in Table 10.
Table 10: Clinical Cure at Test-of-Cure in Trials
1 and 2 - ATe and CE Populations
| |
Trial 1 |
Trial 2 |
VIBATIV
% (n/N) |
Vancomycin
% (n/N) |
Difference
(95% CI)1 |
VIBATIV
% (n/N) |
Vancomycin
% (n/N) |
Difference
(95% CI)1 |
| ATe |
72.5% |
71.6% |
0.9
( -5.3, 7.2) |
74.7% |
74.0% |
0.7
( -5.1, 6.5) |
| (309/426) |
(307/429) |
(342/458) |
(356/481 ) |
| CE |
84.3% |
82.8% |
1.5
( -4.3, 7.3) |
83.9% |
87.7% |
-3.8
( -9.2, 1.5) |
| (289/343) |
(288/348) |
(302/360) |
(315/359 ) |
| 195% CI computed using a continuity correction |
The cure rates by pathogen for the microbiologically
evaluable (ME) population are presented in Table 11.
Table 11 : Clinical Cure Rates at the Test-of-Cure for the
Most Common Pathogens in Trials 1 and 2 – ME Population1
| |
VIBATIV
% (n/N) |
Vancomycin
% (n/N) |
| Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) |
87.0% |
85.9% |
| (208/239) |
(225/262) |
| Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) |
82.0% |
85.1% |
| (132/161) |
(131/154) |
| Enterococcus faecalis |
95.6% |
80.0% |
| (22/23) |
(28/35) |
| Streptococcus pyogenes |
84.2% |
90.5% |
| (16/19) |
(19/21) |
| Streptococcus agalactiae |
73.7% |
86.7% |
| (14/19) |
(13/15) |
| Streptococcus anginosus group |
76.5% |
100.0% |
| (13/17) |
(9/9) |
| 1 The ME population included patients in the
CE population who had Gram positive pathogens isolated at baseline and
had central identification and susceptibility of the microbiological isolate(s)
|
In the two cSSSI trials, clinical cure rates were similar across gender and
race. Clinical cure rates in the telavancin clinically evaluable (CE) population
were lower in patients 65 years of age compared to those < 65 years of age.
A decrease of this magnitude was not observed in the vancomycin CE population.
Clinical cure rates in the telavancin CE population < 65 years of age were
503/581 (86.6%) and in those 65 years were 88/122 (72.1%). In the vancomycin
CE population clinical cure rates in patients < 65 years of age were 492/570
(86.3%) and in those 65 years was 111/137 (82.0%). Clinical cure rates in the
telavancin-treated patients were lower in patients with baseline CrCl 50 mL/min
compared to those with CrCl > 50 mL/min. A decrease of this magnitude was
not observed in the vancomycin-treated patients [see WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS].
REFERENCES
1. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). Methods
for Dilution Antimicrobial Susceptibility Tests for Bacteria that Grow Aerobically;
Approved Standard – 8th ed., CLSI document M7-A8, CLSI, 940 West Valley Rd.,
Suite 1400, Wayne, PA. 19087-1898, 2009.
2. CLSI. Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Disk Susceptibility
Tests, Approved Standard – 10th ed. CLSI document M2-A10; CLSI, Wayne, PA. 19087-1898,
2009.
3. CLSI. Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility
Testing - 19th Informational Supplement. CLSI document M100-S19, CLSI, Wayne,
PA. 19087-1898, 2009.
Last updated on RxList: 9/17/2009