"The 70,000 diagnostic codes known as ICD-10 made their long and nervously awaited debut in medical practices today.
Claims for any service performed on October 1 and beyond must bear one or more of the new diagnostic codes â€” more nume"...
Mechanism of Action
Daclizumab functions as an IL-2 receptor antagonist that binds with high-affinity to the Tac subunit of the high-affinity IL-2 receptor complex and inhibits IL-2 binding. Daclizumab binding is highly specific for Tac, which is expressed on activated but not resting lymphocytes. Administration of ZENAPAX (daclizumab) inhibits IL-2-mediated activation of lymphocytes, a critical pathway in the cellular immune response involved in allograft rejection.
While in the circulation, ZENAPAX (daclizumab) impairs the response of the immune system to antigenic challenges. Whether the ability to respond to repeated or ongoing challenges with those antigens returns to normal after ZENAPAX is cleared is unknown (see PRECAUTIONS).
In clinical trials involving renal allograft patients treated with a 1 mg/kg IV dose of ZENAPAX (daclizumab) every 14 days for a total of five doses, peak serum concentration (mean ± SD) rose between the first dose (21 ± 14 µg/mL) and fifth dose (32 22 g/mL). The mean trough serum concentration before the fifth dose was 7.6±4.0 µg/mL. Population pharmacokinetic analysis of the data using a two-compartment open model gave the following values for a reference patient (45-year-old male Caucasian patient with a body weight of 80 kg and no proteinuria): systemic clearance = 15 mL/hour, volume of central compartment = 2.5 liter, volume of peripheral compartment = 3.4 liter. The estimated terminal elimination half-life for the reference patient was 20 days (480 hours), which is similar to the terminal elimination half-life for human IgG (18 to 23 days). Bayesian estimates of terminal elimination half-life ranged from 11 to 38 days for the 123 patients included in the population analysis. The influence of body weight on systemic clearance supports the dosing of ZENAPAX (daclizumab) on a milligram per kilogram (mg/kg) basis. For patients studied, this dosing maintained drug exposure within 30% of the reference exposure. Covariate analyses showed that no dosage adjustments based on age, race, gender or degree of proteinuria, are required for renal allograft patients. The estimated interpatient variability (percent coefficient of variation) in systemic clearance and central volume of distribution were 15% and 27%, respectively.
Pharmacokinetic parameters were evaluated in 61 pediatric patients treated with a 1 mg/kg IV dose of ZENAPAX (daclizumab) every 14 days for a total of five doses. Peak serum concentration (mean ± SD) rose between the first dose (16±12 µg/mL) and fifth dose (21 ± 14 µg/mL). The mean trough serum concentration before the fifth dose was 5.0 ± 2.7 µg/mL. Population pharmacokinetic analysis of the data using a two-compartment open model gave the following values for a reference patient (Caucasian patient with a body weight of 29.7 kg): systemic clearance = 10 mL/hour, volume of central compartment = 2.0 liter, volume of peripheral compartment = 1.4 liter. The estimated terminal elimination half-life for the reference patient was 13 days (317 hours). For the patients studied, this dosing maintained drug exposure within 50% of the reference exposure. Covariate analyses suggested that disposition parameters were not influenced to a clinically relevant extent by race, gender or degree of proteinuria. The estimated interpatient variability (percent coefficient of variation) in systemic clearance and central volume of distribution were 30% and 40%, respectively.
In vitro and in vivo data suggest that serum levels of 5 to 10 µg/mL are necessary for saturation of the Tac subunit of the IL-2 receptors to block the responses of activated T lymphocytes. At the recommended dosage regimen, daclizumab saturates the Tac subunit of the IL-2 receptor for approximately 90 and 120 days posttransplant, respectively in pediatric and adult patients. The duration of clinically significant IL-2 receptor blockade after the recommended course of ZENAPAX (daclizumab) is not known. No significant changes to circulating lymphocyte numbers or cell phenotypes were observed by flow cytometry. Cytokine release syndrome has not been observed after ZENAPAX (daclizumab) administration.
The safety and efficacy of ZENAPAX (daclizumab) for the prophylaxis of acute organ rejection in adult patients receiving their first cadaveric kidney transplant were assessed in two randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trials. These trials compared a dose of 1.0 mg/kg of ZENAPAX (daclizumab) with placebo when each was administered as part of standard immunosuppressive regimens containing either cyclosporine and corticosteroids (double-therapy trial, no US sites) or cyclosporine, corticosteroids, and azathioprine (triple-therapy trial, predominantly US sites) to prevent acute renal allograft rejection. ZENAPAX (daclizumab) dosing was initiated within 24 hours pretransplant, with subsequent doses given every 14 days for a total of five doses.
The primary efficacy endpoint of both trials was the proportion of patients who developed a biopsy-proven acute rejection episode within the first 6 months following transplantation. As shown in Table 1, this incidence was significantly lower in the group treated with ZENAPAX (daclizumab) in both the double-therapy and triple-therapy trials.
Table 1: Efficacy Parameters
|Triple-therapy Regimen (cyclosporine, corticosteroids, and azathioprine)||Double-therapy Regimen (cyclosporine and corticosteroids)|
|Placebo (N=134)||ZENAPAX (N=126)||p-value||Placebo (N=134)||ZENAPAX (N=141)||p-value|
|Incidence of biopsy-provenacute rejection at 6 months|
|No. of patients||47 (35%)||28 (22%)||0.03||63 (47%)||39 (28%)||0.001|
|Incidence of biopsy-provenacute rejection at 1 year|
|No. of patients||51 (38%)||35 (28%)||n.s.||65 (49%)||39 (28%)||<0.001|
|Graft survival at 3 years post transplant|
|No. of patients with functioning graft||111 (83%)||106 (84%)||n.s.||105 (78%)||116 (82%)||n.s.|
|Patient survival at3 years post transplant|
|No. of patients||126 (94%)||116 (92%)||n.s.||118 (88%)||135 (96%)||0.02|
|n.s. = not significant|
Treatment with ZENAPAX (daclizumab) was associated with better patient survival up to 3 years posttransplant in the double-therapy study. No difference in patient survival was observed in the triple-therapy study between patients treated with ZENAPAX (daclizumab) or placebo up to 3 years posttransplant. No difference was observed for graft survival between treatment groups in both studies at 3 years posttransplant.
The incidence of delayed graft function was not different between patients treated with placebo or ZENAPAX (daclizumab) in either study. No difference in graft function was observed 1 year and 3 years posttransplant in either study between patients treated with placebo or ZENAPAX (daclizumab) .
In a randomized, double-blind study to assess tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and drug interactions in renal allograft recipients, ZENAPAX (daclizumab) (50 patients) or placebo (25 patients) was added to an immunosuppressive regimen of cyclosporine, mycophenolate mofetil, and corticosteroids. In this study, the addition of ZENAPAX (daclizumab) did not result in an increased incidence of adverse events or a change in the types of adverse events reported. The incidence of the combined endpoint of biopsy-proven or clinically presumptive acute rejection was 20% (5 of 25 patients) in the placebo group and 12% (6 of 50 patients) in the ZENAPAX (daclizumab) group. Although numerically lower, the difference in acute rejection was not significant. However, in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of ZENAPAX (daclizumab) in cardiac transplant recipients (n = 434) receiving concomitant cyclosporine, mycophenolate mofetil, and corticosteroids, mortality was increased in patients randomized to receive ZENAPAX (daclizumab) compared with those randomized to receive placebo (see WARNINGS and ADVERSE REACTIONS).
Last reviewed on RxList: 10/28/2008
This monograph has been modified to include the generic and brand name in many instances.
Additional Zenapax Information
Zenapax - User Reviews
Zenapax User Reviews
Now you can gain knowledge and insight about a drug treatment with Patient Discussions.
Report Problems to the Food and Drug Administration
Find out what women really need.