Pharmacokinetics
Following oral administration of a single 500 mg dose (two 250 mg tablets)
to 36 fasted healthy male volunteers, the mean (SD) pharmacokinetic parameters
were AUC0-72 = 4.3 (1.2) µg·h/mL; Cmax = 0.5 (0.2) µg/mL; Tmax =
2.2 (0.9) hours.
With a regimen of 500 mg (two 250 mg capsules*) on day 1, followed by 250 mg daily (one 250 mg capsule) on days 2 through 5, the pharmacokinetic parameters of azithromycin in plasma in healthy young adults (18-40 years of age) are portrayed in the chart below. Cmin and Cmax remained essentially unchanged from day 2 through day 5 of therapy.
| Pharmacokinetic Parameters (Mean) |
Total n=12
Day 1 |
Day 5 |
| Cmax (µg/mL) |
0.41 |
0.24 |
| Tmax (h) |
2.5 |
3.2 |
| AUC0-24 (µg·h/mL) |
2.6 |
2.1 |
| Cmin (µg/mL) |
0.05 |
0.05 |
| Urinary Excret. (% dose) |
4.5 |
6.5 |
| *Azithromycin 250 mg tablets are bioequivalent to 250 mg capsules
in the fasted state. Azithromycin 250 mg capsules are no longer commercially
available. |
In a two-way crossover study, 12 adult healthy volunteers (6 males, 6 females)
received 1,500 mg of azithromycin administered in single daily doses over either
5 days (two 250 mg tablets on day 1, followed by one 250 mg tablet on days 2-5)
or 3 days (500 mg per day for days 1-3). Due to limited serum samples on day
2 (3-day regimen) and days 2-4 (5-day regimen), the serum concentration-time
profile of each subject was fit to a 3-compartment model and the AUC0-∞
for the fitted concentration profile was comparable between the 5-day and 3-day
regimens.
| Pharmacokinetic Parameter [mean
(SD)] |
3-Day Regimen |
5-Day Regimen |
| Day 1 |
Day 3 |
Day 1 |
Day 5 |
| Cmax (serum, µg/mL) |
0.44
(0.22) |
0.54
(0.25) |
0.43
(0.20) |
0.24
(0.06) |
| Serum AUC0-∞ (µg·hr/mL) |
17.4
(6.2)* |
14.9
(3.1)* |
| Serum T1/2 |
71.8 hr |
68.9 hr |
| *Total AUC for the entire 3-day and 5-day
regimens |
Median azithromycin exposure (AUC0-288) in mononuclear (MN) and
polymorphonuclear (PMN) leukocytes following either the 5-day or 3-day regimen
was more than a 1000-fold and 800-fold greater than in serum, respectively.
Administration of the same total dose with either the 5-day or 3-day regimen
may be expected to provide comparable concentrations of azithromycin within
MN and PMN leukocytes.
Two azithromycin 250 mg tablets are bioequivalent to a single 500 mg tablet.
Absorption
The absolute bioavailability of azithromycin 250 mg capsules is 38%.
In a two-way crossover study in which 12 healthy subjects received a single 500 mg dose of azithromycin (two 250 mg tablets) with or without a high fat meal, food was shown to increase Cmax by 23% but had no effect on AUC.
When azithromycin suspension was administered with food to 28 adult healthy male subjects, Cmax increased by 56% and AUC was unchanged.
The AUC of azithromycin was unaffected by co-administration of an antacid containing aluminum and magnesium hydroxide with azithromycin capsules; however, the Cmax was reduced by 24%. Administration of cimetidine (800 mg) two hours prior to azithromycin had no effect on azithromycin absorption.
Distribution
The serum protein binding of azithromycin is variable in the concentration
range approximating human exposure, decreasing from 51% at 0.02 µg/mL to 7%
at 2 µg/mL.
Following oral administration, azithromycin is widely distributed throughout the body with an apparent steady-state volume of distribution of 31.1 L/kg. Greater azithromycin concentrations in tissues than in plasma or serum were observed. High tissue concentrations should not be interpreted to be quantitatively related to clinical efficacy. The antimicrobial activity of azithromycin is pH related and appears to be reduced with decreasing pH. However, the extensive distribution of drug to tissues may be relevant to clinical activity.
Selected tissue (or fluid) concentration and tissue (or fluid) to plasma/serum concentration ratios are shown in the following table:
AZITHROMYCIN CONCENTRATIONS FOLLOWING A 500 mg DOSE (TWO
250 mg CAPSULES) IN ADULTS1
| TISSUE OR FLUID |
TIME AFTER DOSE (h) |
TISSUE OR FLUID CONCENTRATION
(µg/g or µg/mL) |
CORRESPONDING PLASMA OR SERUM LEVEL
(µg/mL) |
TISSUE (FLUID) PLASMA (SERUM) RATIO |
| SKIN |
72-96 |
0.4 |
0.012 |
35 |
| LUNG |
72-96 |
4.0 |
0.012 |
> 100 |
| SPUTUM* |
2-4 |
1.0 |
0.64 |
2 |
| SPUTUM** |
10-12 |
2.9 |
0.1 |
30 |
| TONSIL*** |
9-18 |
4.5 |
0.03 |
> 100 |
| TONSIL*** |
180 |
0.9 |
0.006 |
> 100 |
| CERVIX**** |
19 |
2.8 |
0.04 |
70 |
1 Azithromycin tissue concentrations
were originally determined using 250 mg capsules.
* Sample was obtained 2-4 hours after the first dose.
** Sample was obtained 10-12 hours after the first dose.
*** Dosing regimen of two doses of 250 mg each, separated by
12 hours.
**** Sample was obtained 19 hours after a single 500 mg dose.
|
The extensive tissue distribution was confirmed by examination of additional tissues and fluids (bone, ejaculum, prostate, ovary, uterus, salpinx, stomach, liver, and gallbladder). As there are no data from adequate and well-controlled studies of azithromycin treatment of infections in these additional body sites, the clinical importance of these tissue concentration data is unknown.
Following a regimen of 500 mg on the first day and 250 mg daily for 4 days, only very low concentrations were noted in cerebrospinal fluid (less than 0.01 µg/mL) in the presence of non-inflamed meninges.
Metabolism
In vitro and in vivo studies to assess the metabolism of azithromycin
have not been performed.
Elimination
Plasma concentrations of azithromycin following single 500 mg oral and i.v. doses declined in a polyphasic pattern with a mean apparent plasma clearance of 630 mL/min and terminal elimination half-life of 68 hours. The prolonged terminal half-life is thought to be due to extensive uptake and subsequent release of drug from tissues.
Biliary excretion of azithromycin, predominantly as unchanged drug, is a major route of elimination. Over the course of a week, approximately 6% of the administered dose appears as unchanged drug in urine.
Special Populations
Renal Insufficiency
Azithromycin pharmacokinetics were investigated in 42 adults (21 to 85 years
of age) with varying degrees of renal impairment. Following the oral administration
of a single 1,000 mg dose of azithromycin, mean Cmax and AUC0-120
increased by 5.1% and 4.2%, respectively in subjects with mild to moderate renal
impairment (GFR 10 to 80 mL/min) compared to subjects with normal renal function
(GFR > 80 mL/min). The mean Cmax and AUC0-120 increased 61% and
35%, respectively in subjects with severe renal impairment (GFR < 10 mL/min)
compared to subjects with normal renal function (GFR > 80 mL/min). (See DOSAGE
AND ADMINISTRATION.)
Hepatic Insufficiency
The pharmacokinetics of azithromycin in subjects with hepatic impairment have
not been established.
Gender
There are no significant differences in the disposition of azithromycin between
male and female subjects. No dosage adjustment is recommended based on gender.
Geriatric Patients
When studied in healthy elderly subjects aged 65 to 85 years, the pharmacokinetic parameters of azithromycin in elderly men were similar to those in young adults; however, in elderly women, although higher peak concentrations (increased by 30 to 50%) were observed, no significant accumulation occurred.
Pediatric Patients
In two clinical studies, azithromycin for oral suspension was dosed at 10 mg/kg
on day 1, followed by 5 mg/kg on days 2 through 5 to two groups of pediatric
patients (aged 1-5 years and 5-15 years, respectively). The mean pharmacokinetic
parameters on day 5 were Cmax=0.216 µg/mL, Tmax=1.9 hours, and AUC0-24=1.822
µg·hr/mL for the 1- to 5-year-old group and were Cmax=0.383 µg/mL,
Tmax=2.4 hours, and AUC0-24=3.109 µg·hr/mL for the 5-
to 15-year-old group.
Two clinical studies were conducted in 68 pediatric patients aged 3-16 years to determine the pharmacokinetics and safety of azithromycin for oral suspension. Azithromycin was administered following a low-fat breakfast.
The first study consisted of 35 pediatric patients treated with 20 mg/kg/day (maximum daily dose 500 mg) for 3 days of whom 34 patients were evaluated for pharmacokinetics.
In the second study, 33 pediatric patients received doses of 12 mg/kg/day (maximum daily dose 500 mg) for 5 days of whom 31 patients were evaluated for pharmacokinetics.
In both studies, azithromycin concentrations were determined over a 24 hour period following the last daily dose. Patients weighing above 25.0 kg in the 3-day study or 41.7 kg in the 5-day study received the maximum adult daily dose of 500 mg. Eleven patients (weighing 25.0 kg or less) in the first study and 17 patients (weighing 41.7 kg or less) in the second study received a total dose of 60 mg/kg. The following table shows pharmacokinetic data in the subset of pediatric patients who received a total dose of 60 mg/kg.
Pharmacokinetic Parameter
[mean (SD)] |
3-Day Regimen
(20 mg/kg x 3 days) |
5-Day Regimen
(12 mg/kg x 5 days) |
| n |
11 |
17 |
| Cmax (µg/mL) |
1.1 (0.4) |
0.5 (0.4) |
| Tmax (hr) |
2.7 (1.9) |
2.2 (0.8) |
| AUC0-24(µg-hr/mL) |
7.9 (2.9) |
3.9 (1.9) |
The similarity of the overall exposure (AUC0-∞) between the 3-day
and 5-day regimens in pediatric patients is unknown.
Single dose pharmacokinetics in pediatric patients given doses of 30 mg/kg
have not been studied (See DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION.)
Drug-Drug Interactions
Drug interaction studies were performed with azithromycin and other drugs likely to be coadministered. The effects of co-administration of azithromycin on the pharmacokinetics of other drugs are shown in Table 1 and the effect of other drugs on the pharmacokinetics of azithromycin are shown in Table 2.
Co-administration of azithromycin at therapeutic doses had a modest effect on the pharmacokinetics of the drugs listed in Table 1. No dosage adjustment of drugs listed in Table 1 is recommended when co-administered with azithromycin.
Co-administration of azithromycin with efavirenz or fluconazole had a modest
effect on the pharmacokinetics of azithromycin. Nelfinavir significantly increased
the Cmax and AUC of azithromycin. No dosage adjustment of azithromycin is recommended
when administered with drugs listed in Table 2. (See PRECAUTIONS: DRUG
INTERACTIONS.)
Table 1. Drug Interactions: Pharmacokinetic Parameters for
Co-administered Drugs in the Presence of Azithromycin
| Co-administered Drug |
Dose of Co-administered Drug |
Dose of Azithromycin |
n |
Ratio (with/without azithromycin) of Co-administered Drug
Pharmacokinetic Parameters (90% CI); No Effect = 1.00 |
| Mean Cmax |
Mean AUC |
| Atorvastatin |
10 mg/day x 8 days |
500 mg/day PO on days 6-8 |
12 |
0.83
(0.63 to 1.08) |
1.01
(0.81 to 1.25) |
| Carbamazepine |
200 mg/day x 2 days, then 200 mg BID x 18 days |
500 mg/day PO for days 16-18 |
7 |
0.97
(0.88 to 1.06) |
0.96
(0.88 to 1.06) |
| Cetirizine |
20 mg/day x 11 days |
500 mg PO on day 7, then 250 mg/day on days 8-11 |
14 |
1.03
(0.93 to 1.14) |
1.02
(0.92 to 1.13) |
| Didanosine |
200 mg PO BID x 21 days |
1,200 mg/day PO on days 8-21 |
6 |
1.44
(0.85 to 2.43) |
1.14
(0.83 to 1.57) |
| Efavirenz |
400 mg/day x 7 days |
600 mg PO on day 7 |
14 |
1.04* |
0.95* |
| Fluconazole |
200 mg PO single dose |
1,200 mg PO single dose |
18 |
1.04
(0.98 to 1.11) |
1.01
(0.97 to 1.05) |
| Indinavir |
800 mg TID x 5 days |
1,200 mg PO on day 5 |
18 |
0.96
(0.86 to 1.08) |
0.90
(0.81 to 1.00) |
| Midazolam |
15 mg PO on day 3 |
500 mg/day PO x 3 days |
12 |
1.27
(0.89 to 1.81) |
1.26
(1.01 to 1.56) |
| Nelfinavir |
750 mg TID x 11 days |
1,200 mg PO on day 9 |
14 |
0.90
(0.81 to 1.01) |
0.85
(0.78 to 0.93) |
| Rifabutin |
300 mg/day x 10 days |
500 mg PO on day 1, then 250 mg/day on days 2-10 |
6 |
See footnote below |
NA |
| Sildenafil |
100 mg on days 1 and 4 |
500 mg/day PO x 3 days |
12 |
1.16
(0.86 to 1.57) |
0.92
(0.75 to 1.12) |
| Theophylline |
4 mg/kg IV on days 1, 11, 25 |
500 mg PO on day 7, 250 mg/day on days 8-11 |
10 |
1.19
(1.02 to 1.40) |
1.02
(0.86 to 1.22) |
| Theophylline |
300 mg PO BID x 15 days |
500 mg PO on day 6, then 250 mg/day on days 7-10 |
8 |
1.09
(0.92 to 1.29) |
1.08
(0.89 to 1.31) |
| Triazolam |
0.125 mg on day 2 |
500 mg PO on day 1, then 250 mg/day on day 2 |
12 |
1.06* |
1.02* |
| Trimethoprim/ Sulfamethoxazole |
160 mg/800 mg/day PO x 7 days |
1,200 mg PO on day 7 |
12 |
0.85
(0.75 to 0.97)/
0.90
(0.78 to 1.03) |
0.87
(0.80 to 0.95/
0.96
(0.88 to 1.03) |
| Zidovudine |
500 mg/day PO x 21 days |
600 mg/day PO x 14 days |
5 |
1.12
(0.42 to 3.02) |
0.94
(0.52 to 1.70) |
| Zidovudine |
500 mg/day PO x 21 days |
1,200 mg/day PO x 14 days |
4 |
1.31
(0.43 to 3.97) |
1.30
(0.69 to 2.43) |
NA - Not Available
* - 90% Confidence interval not reported
Mean rifabutin concentrations one-half day after the last dose of rifabutin
were 60 ng/mL when co-administered with azithromycin and 71 ng/mL when co-administered
with placebo. |
Table 2. Drug Interactions: Pharmacokinetic Parameters for
Azithromycin in the Presence of Co-administered Drugs (See PRECAUTIONS: DRUG
INTERACTIONS.)
| Co-administered Drug |
Dose of Co-administered Drug |
Dose of Azithromycin |
n |
Ratio (with/without co-administered drug) of Azithromycin
Pharmacokinetic Parameters (90% CI); No Effect = 1.00 |
| Mean Cmax |
Mean AUC |
| Efavirenz |
400 mg/day x 7 days |
600 mg PO on day 7 |
14 |
1.22
(1.04 to 1.42) |
0.92* |
| Fluconazole |
200 mg PO single dose |
1,200 mg PO single dose |
18 |
0.82
(0.66 to 1.02) |
1.07
(0.94 to 1.22) |
| Nelfinavir |
750 mg TID x 11 days |
1,200 mg PO on day 9 |
14 |
2.36
(1.77 to 3.15) |
2.12
(1.80 to 2.50) |
| Rifabutin |
300 mg/day x 10 days |
500 mg PO on day 1, then 250 mg/day on days 2-10 |
6 |
See footnote below |
NA |
NA – Not available
* - 90% Confidence interval not reported
Mean azithromycin concentrations one day after the last dose were 53 ng/mL
when coadministered with 300 mg daily rifabutin and 49 ng/mL when coadministered
with placebo. |
Microbiology
Azithromycin acts by binding to the 50S ribosomal subunit of susceptible microorganisms
and, thus, interfering with microbial protein synthesis. Nucleic acid synthesis
is not affected.
Azithromycin concentrates in phagocytes and fibroblasts as demonstrated by
in vitro incubation techniques. Using such methodology, the ratio of
intracellular to extracellular concentration was > 30 after one hour incubation.
In vivo studies suggest that concentration in phagocytes may contribute
to drug distribution to inflamed tissues.
Azithromycin has been shown to be active against most isolates of the following
microorganisms, both in vitro and in clinical infections as described
in the INDICATIONS section.
Aerobic and facultative gram-positive microorganisms
Staphylococcus aureus
Streptococcus agalactiae
Streptococcus pneumoniae
Streptococcus pyogenes
NOTE: Azithromycin demonstrates cross-resistance with erythromycin-resistant
gram-positive strains. Most strains of Enterococcus faecalis and methicillin-resistant
staphylococci are resistant to azithromycin.
Aerobic and facultative gram-negative microorganisms
Haemophilus ducreyi
Haemophilus influenzae
Moraxella catarrhalis
Neisseria gonorrhoeae
“Other” microorganisms
Chlamydia pneumoniae
Chlamydia trachomatis
Mycoplasma pneumoniae
Beta-lactamase production should have no effect on azithromycin activity.
The following in vitro data are available, but their clinical significance
is unknown.
At least 90% of the following microorganisms exhibit an in vitro minimum
inhibitory concentration (MIC) less than or equal to the susceptible breakpoints
for azithromycin. However, the safety and effectiveness of azithromycin in treating
clinical infections due to these microorganisms have not been established in
adequate and well-controlled trials.
Aerobic and facultative gram-positive microorganisms
Streptococci (Groups C, F, G)
Viridans group streptococci
Aerobic and facultative gram-negative microorganisms
Bordetella pertussis
Legionella pneumophila
Anaerobic microorganisms
Peptostreptococcus species
Prevotella bivia
“Other” microorganisms
Ureaplasma urealyticum
Susceptibility Testing Methods
When available, the results of in vitro susceptibility test results
for antimicrobial drugs used in resident hospitals should be provided to the
physician as periodic reports which describe the susceptibility profile of nosocomial
and community-acquired pathogens. These reports may differ from susceptibility
data obtained from outpatient use, but could aid the physician in selecting
the most effective antimicrobial.
Dilution techniques
Quantitative methods are used to determine antimicrobial minimum inhibitory
concentrations (MICs). These MICs provide estimates of the susceptibility of
bacteria to antimicrobial compounds. The MICs should be determined using a standardized
procedure. Standardized procedures are based on a dilution method1,3
(broth or agar) or equivalent with standardized inoculum concentrations and
standardized concentrations of azithromycin powder. The MIC values should be
interpreted according to criteria provided in Table 1.
Diffusion techniques
Quantitative methods that require measurement of zone diameters also provide
reproducible estimates of the susceptibility of bacteria to antimicrobial compounds.
One such standardized procedure2,3 requires the use of standardized
inoculum concentrations. This procedure uses paper disks impregnated with 15-ug
azithromycin to test the susceptibility of microorganisms to azithromycin. The
disk diffusion interpretive criteria are provided in Table 1.
Table 1. Susceptibility Interpretive Criteria for Azithromycin
Susceptibility Test Result Interpretive Criteria
| Pathogen |
Minimum Inhibitory
Concentrations (µg/mL) |
Disk Diffusion
(zone diameters in mm) |
| S |
I |
Ra |
S |
I |
Ra |
| Haemophilus spp. |
≤ 4 |
-- |
-- |
≥ 12 |
-- |
-- |
| Staphylococcus aureus |
≤ 2 |
4 |
≥ 8 |
≥ 18 |
14-17 |
≤ 13 |
| Streptococci including S. pneumoniaeb |
≤ 0.5 |
1 |
≥ 2 |
≥ 18 |
14-17 |
≤ 13 |
a The current absence of data on resistant strains
precludes defining any category other than “susceptible.” If strains yield
MIC results other than susceptible, they should be submitted to a reference
laboratory for further testing.
b Susceptibility of streptococci including S. pneumoniae
to azithromycin and other macrolides can be predicted by testing erythromycin.
|
No interpretive criteria have been established for testing Neisseria gonorrhoeae.
This species is not usually tested.
A report of “susceptible” indicates that the pathogen is likely to be inhibited
if the antimicrobial compound reaches the concentrations usually achievable.
A report of “intermediate” indicates that the result should be considered equivocal,
and, if the microorganism is not fully susceptible to alternative, clinically
feasible drugs, the test should be repeated. This category implies possible
clinical applicability in body sites where the drug is physiologically concentrated
or in situations where high dosage of drug can be used. This category also provides
a buffer zone which prevents small uncontrolled technical factors from causing
major discrepancies in interpretation. A report of “resistant” indicates that
the pathogen is not likely to be inhibited if the antimicrobial compound reaches
the concentrations usually achievable; other therapy should be selected.
Quality Control
Standardized susceptibility test procedures require the use of quality control microorganisms to control the technical aspects of the test procedures. Standard azithromycin powder should provide the following range of values noted in Table 2. Quality control microorganisms are specific strains of organisms with intrinsic biological properties. QC strains are very stable strains which will give a standard and repeatable susceptibility pattern. The specific strains used for microbiological quality control are not clinically significant.
Table 2. Acceptable Quality Control Ranges for Azithromycin
| QC Strain |
Minimum Inhibitory Concentrations (µg/mL) |
Disk Diffusion
(zone diameters in mm) |
| Haemophilus influenzae ATCC 49247 |
1.0-4.0 |
13-21 |
| Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 29213 |
0.5-2.0 |
|
| Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 25923 |
|
21-26 |
| Streptococcus pneumoniae ATCC 49619 |
0.06-0.25 |
19-25 |
Clinical Studies
(See INDICATIONS and Pediatric
Use)
Pediatric Patients
From the perspective of evaluating pediatric clinical trials, Days 11-14 were considered on-therapy evaluations because of the extended half-life of azithromycin. Day 11-14 data are provided for clinical guidance. Day 24-32 evaluations were considered the primary test of cure endpoint.
Acute Otitis Media
Safety and efficacy using azithromycin 30 mg/kg given over 5 days
Protocol 1
In a double-blind, controlled clinical study of acute otitis media performed
in the United States, azithromycin (10 mg/kg on Day 1 followed by 5 mg/kg on
Days 2-5) was compared to amoxicillin/clavulanate potassium (4:1). For the 553
patients who were evaluated for clinical efficacy, the clinical success rate
(i.e., cure plus improvement) at the Day 11 visit was 88% for azithromycin and
88% for the control agent. For the 521 patients who were evaluated at the Day
30 visit, the clinical success rate was 73% for azithromycin and 71% for the
control agent.
In the safety analysis of the above study, the incidence of treatment-related adverse events, primarily gastrointestinal, in all patients treated was 9% with azithromycin and 31% with the control agent. The most common side effects were diarrhea/loose stools (4% azithromycin vs. 20% control), vomiting (2% azithromycin vs. 7% control), and abdominal pain (2% azithromycin vs. 5% control).
Protocol 2
In a non-comparative clinical and microbiologic trial performed in the United States, where significant rates of beta-lactamase producing organisms (35%) were found, 131 patients were evaluable for clinical efficacy. The combined clinical success rate (i.e., cure and improvement) at the Day 11 visit was 84% for azithromycin. For the 122 patients who were evaluated at the Day 30 visit, the clinical success rate was 70% for azithromycin.
Microbiologic determinations were made at the pre-treatment visit. Microbiology was not reassessed at later visits. The following presumptive bacterial/clinical cure outcomes (i.e., clinical success) were obtained from the evaluable group:
Presumed Bacteriologic Eradication
| |
Day 11 Azithromycin |
Day 30 Azithromycin |
| S. pneumoniae |
61/74 (82%) |
40/56 (71%) |
| H. influenzae |
43/54 (80%) |
30/47 (64%) |
| M. catarrhalis |
28/35 (80%) |
19/26 (73%) |
| S. pyogenes |
11/11 (100%) |
7/7 |
| Overall |
177/217 (82%) |
97/137 (73%) |
In the safety analysis of this study, the incidence of treatment-related adverse events, primarily gastrointestinal, in all patients treated was 9%. The most common side effect was diarrhea (4%).
Protocol 3
In another controlled comparative clinical and microbiologic study of otitis
media performed in the United States, azithromycin was compared to amoxicillin/clavulanate
potassium (4:1). This study utilized two of the same investigators as Protocol
2 (above), and these two investigators enrolled 90% of the patients in Protocol
3. For this reason, Protocol 3 was not considered to be an independent study.
Significant rates of beta-lactamase producing organisms (20%) were found. Ninety-two
(92) patients were evaluable for clinical and microbiologic efficacy. The combined
clinical success rate (i.e., cure and improvement) of those patients with a
baseline pathogen at the Day 11 visit was 88% for azithromycin vs. 100% for
control; at the Day 30 visit, the clinical success rate was 82% for azithromycin
vs. 80% for control.
Microbiologic determinations were made at the pre-treatment visit. Microbiology
was not reassessed at later visits. At the Day 11 and Day 30 visits, the following
presumptive bacterial/clinical cure outcomes (i.e., clinical success) were obtained
from the evaluable group:
Presumed Bacteriologic Eradication
| |
Day 11 |
Day 30 |
| Azithromycin |
Control |
Azithromycin |
Control |
| S. pneumoniae |
25/29 (86%) |
26/26 (100%) |
22/28 (79%) |
18/22 (82%) |
| H. influenzae |
9/11 (82%) |
9/9 |
8/10 (80%) |
6/8 |
| M. catarrhalis |
7/7 |
5/5 |
5/5 |
2/3 |
| S. pyogenes |
2/2 |
5/5 |
2/2 |
4/4 |
| Overall |
43/49 (88%) |
45/45 (100%) |
37/45 (82%) |
30/37 (81%) |
In the safety analysis of the above study, the incidence of treatment-related adverse events, primarily gastrointestinal, in all patients treated was 4% with azithromycin and 31% with the control agent. The most common side effect was diarrhea/loose stools (2% azithromycin vs. 29% control).
Safety and efficacy using azithromycin 30 mg/kg given over 3 days
Protocol 4
In a double-blind, controlled, randomized clinical study of acute otitis media in pediatric patients from 6 months to 12 years of age, azithromycin (10 mg/kg per day for 3 days) was compared to amoxicillin/clavulanate potassium (7:1) in divided doses q12h for 10 days. Each patient received active drug and placebo matched for the comparator.
For the 366 patients who were evaluated for clinical efficacy at the Day 12 visit, the clinical success rate (i.e., cure plus improvement) was 83% for azithromycin and 88% for the control agent. For the 362 patients who were evaluated at the Day 24-28 visit, the clinical success rate was 74% for azithromycin and 69% for the control agent.
In the safety analysis of the above study, the incidence of treatment-related
adverse events, primarily gastrointestinal, in all patients treated was 10.6%
with azithromycin and 20.0% with the control agent. The most common side effects
were diarrhea/loose stools (5.9% azithromycin vs. 14.6% control), vomiting (2.1%
azithromycin vs. 1.1% control), and rash (0.0% azithromycin vs. 4.3% control).
Safety and efficacy using azithromycin 30 mg/kg given as a single dose
Protocol 5
A double blind, controlled, randomized trial was performed at nine clinical
centers. Pediatric patients from 6 months to 12 years of age were randomized
1:1 to treatment with either azithromycin (given at 30 mg/kg as a single dose
on Day 1) or amoxicillin/clavulanate potassium (7:1), divided q12h for 10 days.
Each child received active drug, and placebo matched for the comparator.
Clinical response (Cure, Improvement, Failure) was evaluated at End of Therapy (Day 12-16) and Test of Cure (Day 28-32). Safety was evaluated throughout the trial for all treated subjects. For the 321 subjects who were evaluated at End of Treatment, the clinical success rate (cure plus improvement) was 87% for azithromycin, and 88% for the comparator. For the 305 subjects who were evaluated at Test of Cure, the clinical success rate was 75% for both azithromycin and the comparator.
In the safety analysis, the incidence of treatment-related adverse events, primarily gastrointestinal, was 16.8% with azithromycin, and 22.5% with the comparator. The most common side effects were diarrhea (6.4% with azithromycin vs. 12.7% with the comparator), vomiting (4% with each agent), rash (1.7% with azithromycin vs. 5.2% with the comparator) and nausea (1.7% with azithromycin vs. 1.2% with the comparator).
Protocol 6
In a non-comparative clinical and microbiological trial, 248 patients from
6 months to 12 years of age with documented acute otitis media were dosed with
a single oral dose of azithromycin (30 mg/kg on Day 1).
For the 240 patients who were evaluable for clinical modified Intent-to-Treat
(MITT) analysis, the clinical success rate (i.e., cure plus improvement) at
Day 10 was 89% and for the 242 patients evaluable at Day 24-28, the clinical
success rate (cure) was 85%.
Presumed Bacteriologic Eradication
| |
Day 10 |
Day 24-28 |
| S. pneumoniae |
70/76 (92%) |
67/76 (88%) |
| H. influenzae |
30/42 (71%) |
28/44 (64%) |
| M. catarrhalis |
10/10 (100%) |
10/10 (100%) |
| Overall |
110/128 (86%) |
105/130 (81%) |
In the safety analysis of this study, the incidence of treatment-related adverse events, primarily gastrointestinal, in all the subjects treated was 12.1%. The most common side effects were vomiting (5.6%), diarrhea (3.2%), and abdominal pain (1.6%).
Pharyngitis/Tonsillitis
In three double-blind controlled studies, conducted in the United States, azithromycin
(12 mg/kg once a day for 5 days) was compared to penicillin V (250 mg three
times a day for 10 days) in the treatment of pharyngitis due to documented Group
A P-hemolytic streptococci (GABHS or S. pyogenes). Azithromycin was clinically
and microbiologically statistically superior to penicillin at Day 14 and Day
30 with the following clinical success (i.e., cure and improvement) and bacteriologic
efficacy rates (for the combined evaluable patient with documented GABHS):
Three U.S. Streptococcal Pharyngitis Studies Azithromycin
vs. Penicillin V EFFICACY RESULTS
| |
Day 14 |
Day 30 |
| Bacteriologic Eradication |
| Azithromycin |
323/340 (95%) |
255/330 (77%) |
| Penicillin V |
242/332 (73%) |
206/325 (63%) |
| Clinical Success (Cure plus improvement) |
| Azithromycin |
336/343 (98%) |
310/330 (94%) |
| Penicillin V |
284/338 (84%) |
241/325 (74%) |
Approximately 1% of azithromycin-susceptible S. pyogenes isolates were
resistant to azithromycin following therapy.
The incidence of treatment-related adverse events, primarily gastrointestinal, in all patients treated was 18% on azithromycin and 13% on penicillin. The most common side effects were diarrhea/loose stools (6% azithromycin vs. 2% penicillin), vomiting (6% azithromycin vs. 4% penicillin), and abdominal pain (3% azithromycin vs. 1% penicillin).
Adult Patients
Acute Bacterial Exacerbations of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
In a randomized, double-blind controlled clinical trial of acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis (AECB), azithromycin (500 mg once daily for 3 days) was compared with clarithromycin (500 mg twice daily for 10 days). The primary endpoint of this trial was the clinical cure rate at Day 21- 24. For the 304 patients analyzed in the modified intent to treat analysis at the Day 21-24 visit, the clinical cure rate for 3 days of azithromycin was 85% (125/147) compared to 82% (129/157) for 10 days of clarithromycin.
The following outcomes were the clinical cure rates at the Day 21-24 visit for the bacteriologically evaluable patients by pathogen:
| Pathogen |
Azithromycin (3 Days) |
Clarithromycin (10 Days) |
| S. pneumoniae |
29/32 (91%) |
21/27 (78%) |
| H. influenzae |
12/14 (86%) |
14/16 (88%) |
| M. catarrhalis |
11/12 (92%) |
12/15 (80%) |
In the safety analysis of this study, the incidence of treatment-related adverse
events, primarily gastrointestinal, were comparable between treatment arms (25%
with azithromycin and 29% with clarithromycin). The most common side effects
were diarrhea, nausea and abdominal pain with comparable incidence rates for
each symptom of 5-9% between the two treatment arms. (See ADVERSE
REACTIONS.)
Acute Bacterial Sinusitis
In a randomized, double blind, double-dummy controlled clinical trial of acute bacterial sinusitis, azithromycin (500 mg once daily for 3 days) was compared with amoxicillin/clavulanate (500/125 mg tid for 10 days). Clinical response assessments were made at Day 10 and Day 28. The primary endpoint of this trial was prospectively defined as the clinical cure rate at Day 28. For the 594 patients analyzed in the modified intent to treat analysis at the Day 10 visit, the clinical cure rate for 3 days of azithromycin was 88% (268/303) compared to 85% (248/291) for 10 days of amoxicillin/clavulanate. For the 586 patients analyzed in the modified intent to treat analysis at the Day 28 visit, the clinical cure rate for 3 days of azithromycin was 71.5% (213/298) compared to 71.5% (206/288), with a 97.5% confidence interval of –8.4 to 8.3, for 10 days of amoxicillin/clavulanate.
In the safety analysis of this study, the overall incidence of treatment-related
adverse events, primarily gastrointestinal, was lower in the azithromycin treatment
arm (31%) than in the amoxicillin/clavulanate arm (51%). The most common side
effects were diarrhea (17% in the azithromycin arm vs. 32% in the amoxicillin/clavulanate
arm), and nausea (7% in the azithromycin arm vs. 12% in the amoxicillin/clavulanate
arm). (See ADVERSE REACTIONS).
In an open label, noncomparative study requiring baseline transantral sinus punctures the following outcomes were the clinical success rates at the Day 7 and Day 28 visits for the modified intent to treat patients administered 500 mg of azithromycin once daily for 3 days with the following pathogens:
| Pathogen |
Azithromycin
(500 mg per day for 3 Days) |
| Day 7 |
Day28 |
| S. pneumoniae |
23/26 (88%) |
21/25 (84%) |
| H. influenzae |
28/32 (87%) |
24/32 (75%) |
| M. catarrhalis |
14/15 (93%) |
13/15 (87%) |
The overall incidence of treatment-related adverse events in the noncomparative
study was 21% in modified intent to treat patients treated with azithromycin
at 500 mg once daily for 3 days with the most common side effects being diarrhea
(9%), abdominal pain (4%) and nausea (3%). (See ADVERSE REACTIONS)
Animal Toxicology
Phospholipidosis (intracellular phospholipid accumulation) has been observed
in some tissues of mice, rats, and dogs given multiple doses of azithromycin.
It has been demonstrated in numerous organ systems (e.g., eye, dorsal root ganglia,
liver, gallbladder, kidney, spleen, and pancreas) in dogs treated with azithromycin
at doses which, expressed on the basis of mg/m2, are approximately
equal to the recommended adult human dose, and in rats treated at doses approximately
one-sixth of the recommended adult human dose. This effect has been shown to
be reversible after cessation of azithromycin treatment. Phospholipidosis has
been observed to a similar extent in the tissues of neonatal rats and dogs given
daily doses of azithromycin ranging from 10 days to 30 days. Based on the pharmacokinetic
data, phospholipidosis has been seen in the rat (30 mg/kg dose) at observed
Cmax value of 1.3 µg/mL (six times greater than the observed Cmax of 0.216
µg/mL at the pediatric dose of 10 mg/kg). Similarly, it has been shown
in the dog (10 mg/kg dose) at observed Cmax value of 1.5 µg/mL (seven
times greater than the observed same Cmax and drug dose in the studied pediatric
population). On a mg/m2 basis, 30 mg/kg dose in the neonatal rat
(135 mg/m2) and 10 mg/kg dose in the neonatal dog (79 mg/m2)
are approximately 0.5 and 0.3 times, respectively, the recommended dose in the
pediatric patients with an average body weight of 25 kg. Phospholipidosis, similar
to that seen in the adult animals, is reversible after cessation of azithromycin
treatment. The significance of these findings for animals and for humans is
unknown.
REFERENCES
1. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, Methods for Dilution
Antimicrobial Susceptibility Tests for Bacteria That Grow Aerobically -
Fifth Edition. Approved Standard NCCLS Document M7-A5, Vol. 20, No. 2 (ISBN
1-56238-394-9). NCCLS, 940 West Valley Road, Suite 1400, Wayne, PA 19087-1898,
January 2000.
2. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, Performance Standards
for Antimicrobial Disk Susceptibility Tests - Seventh Edition. Approved
Standard NCCLS Document M2-A7, Vol. 20, No. 1 (ISBN 1-56238-393-0). NCCLS, 940
West Valley Road, Suite 1400, Wayne, PA 19087-1898, January 2000.
3. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. Performance Standards
for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing - Eleventh Informational Supplement.
NCCLS Document M100-S11, Vol. 21, No. 1 (ISBN 1-56238-426-0). NCCLS, 940 West
Valley Road, Suite 1400, Wayne, PA 19087-1898, January 2001.
Last updated on RxList: 4/15/2009