Pharmacokinetics
In patients hospitalized with community-acquired pneumonia receiving single
daily one-hour intravenous infusions for 2 to 5 days of 500 mg azithromycin
at a concentration of 2 mg/mL, the mean Cmax ± S.D. achieved was 3.63
± 1.60 μg/mL, while the 24-hour trough level was 0.20 ± 0.15
μg/mL, and the AUC24 was 9.60 ± 4.80 μg•h/mL.
The mean Cmax, 24-hour trough and AUC24 values were 1.14 ±
0.14 μg/mL, 0.18 ± 0.02 μg/mL, and 8.03 ± 0.86 μg•h/mL, respectively, in normal volunteers
receiving a 3-hour intravenous infusion of 500 mg azithromycin at a
concentration of 1 mg/mL. Similar pharmacokinetic values were obtained in
patients hospitalized with community-acquired pneumonia that received the same
3-hour dosage regimen for 2-5 days.
Plasma concentrations (μg/mL ± S.D.) after the last
daily intravenous infusion of 500 mg azithromycin
| Infusion Concentration, Duration |
Time after starting the infusion (hr) |
| 0.5 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
6 |
8 |
12 |
24 |
| 2 mg/mL, 1 hra |
2.98 ± 1.12 |
3.63 ± 1.73 |
0.60 ± 0.31 |
0.40 ± 0.23 |
0.33 ± 0.16 |
0.26 ± 0.14 |
0.27 ± 0.15 |
0.20 ± 0.12 |
0.20 ± 0.15 |
| 1 mg/mL, 3 hrb |
0.91 ± 0.13 |
1.02 ± 0.11 |
1.14 ± 0.13 |
1.13 ± 0.16 |
0.32 ± 0.05 |
0.28 ± 0.04 |
0.27 ± 0.03 |
0.22 ± 0.02 |
0.18 ± 0.02 |
a = 500 mg (2 mg/mL) for 2-5 days in Community-acquired pneumonia patients.
b = 500 mg (1 mg/mL) for 5 days in healthy subjects. |
The average CLτ and Vd values were 10.18 mL/min/kg and 33.3
L/kg, respectively, in 18 normal volunteers receiving 1000 to 4000-mg doses
given as 1 mg/mL over 2 hours.
Comparison of the plasma pharmacokinetic parameters following
the 1st and 5th daily doses of 500 mg intravenous azithromycin showed only an
8% increase in Cmax but a 61% increase in AUC24 reflecting a threefold rise in
C24 trough levels.
Following single oral doses of 500 mg azithromycin (two 250
mg capsules) to 12 healthy volunteers, Cmax, trough level, and AUC24 were
reported to be 0.41 μg/mL, 0.05 μg/mL, and 2.6 μg•h/mL,
respectively. These oral values are approximately 38%, 83%, and 52% of the
values observed following a single 500-mg I.V. 3-hour infusion (Cmax: 1.08
μg/mL, trough: 0.06 μg/mL, and AUC24: 5.0 μg•h/mL). Thus, plasma concentrations are higher
following the intravenous regimen throughout the 24-hour interval. The
pharmacokinetic parameters on day 5 of azithromycin 250-mg capsules following a
500-mg oral loading dose to healthy young adults (age 18-40 years old) were as
follows: Cmax: 0.24 μg/mL, AUC24: 2.1 μg•h/mL. Azithromycin 250 mg
capsules are no longer commercially available. Azithromycin 250 mg tablets are
bioequivalent to 250 mg capsules in the fasting state.
Median azithromycin exposure (AUC0-288) in mononuclear (MN)
and polymorphonuclear (PMN) leukocytes following 1,500 mg of oral azithromycin,
administered in single daily doses over either 5 days (two 250 mg tablets on
day 1, followed by one 250 mg tablet on days 2-5) or 3 days (500 mg per day for
days 1-3) to 12 healthy volunteers, was more than a 1000-fold and 800-fold
greater than in serum, respectively.
Distribution
The serum protein binding of azithromycin is
variable in the concentration range approximating human exposure, decreasing
from 51% at 0.02 μg/mL to 7% at 2 μg/mL.
Tissue concentrations have not been obtained following
intravenous infusions of azithromycin. Selected tissue (or fluid) concentration
and tissue (or fluid) to plasma/serum concentration ratios following oral
administration of azithromycin are shown in the following table:
AZITHROMYCIN CONCENTRATIONS FOLLOWING A500 mg DOSE (TWO 250
mg CAPSULES) IN ADULTS
| TISSUE OR FLUID |
TIME AFTER DOSE (h) |
TISSUE OR FLUID CONCENTRATION (μg/g or μg/mL)1 |
CORRESPONDING PLASMA OR SERUM LEVEL (μg/mL) |
TISSUE (FLUID) PLASMA (SERUM) RATIO1 |
| SKIN |
72-96 |
0.4 |
0.012 |
35 |
| LUNG |
72-96 |
4.0 |
0.012 |
> 100 |
| SPUTUM* |
2-4 |
1.0 |
0.64 |
2 |
| SPUTUM** |
10-12 |
2.9 |
0.1 |
30 |
| TONSIL*** |
9-18 |
4.5 |
0.03 |
> 100 |
| TONSIL*** |
180 |
0.9 |
0.006 |
> 100 |
| CERVIX**** |
19 |
2.8 |
0.04 |
70 |
1High tissue concentrations should not be interpreted to be quantitatively related to clinical efficacy. The antimicrobial activity of azithromycin is pH related and appears to be reduced with decreasing pH. However, the extensive distribution of drug to tissues may be relevant to clinical activity.
* Sample was obtained 2-4 hours after the first dose.
** Sample was obtained 10-12 hours after the first dose.
*** Dosing regimen of 2 doses of 250 mg each, separated by 12 hours.
**** Sample was obtained 19 hours after a single 500 mg dose. |
Tissue levels were determined following a single oral dose
of 500 mg azithromycin in 7 gynecological patients. Approximately 17 hours
after dosing, azithromycin concentrations were 2.7 μg/g in ovarian tissue,
3.5 μg/g in uterine tissue, and 3.3 μg/g in salpinx. Following a
regimen of 500 mg on the first day followed by 250 mg daily for 4 days,
concentrations in the cerebrospinal fluid were less than 0.01 μg/mL in the
presence of non-inflamed meninges.
Metabolism
In vitro and in vivo studies to assess the
metabolism of azithromycin have not been performed.
Elimination
Plasma concentrations of azithromycin following
single 500 mg oral and i.v. doses declined in a polyphasic pattern with a mean
apparent plasma clearance of 630 mL/min and terminal elimination half-life of
68 hours. The prolonged terminal half-life is thought to be due to extensive
uptake and subsequent release of drug from tissues.
In a multiple-dose study in 12 normal volunteers utilizing a
500-mg (1 mg/mL) one-hour intravenous-dosage regimen for five days, the amount
of administered azithromycin dose excreted in urine in 24 hours was about 11%
after the 1st dose and 14% after the 5th dose. These values are greater than the
reported 6% excreted unchanged in urine after oral administration of
azithromycin. Biliary excretion is a major route of elimination for unchanged
drug, following oral administration.
Special Populations
Renal Insufficiency
Azithromycin pharmacokinetics were investigated in 42 adults (21 to 85 years
of age) with varying degrees of renal impairment. Following the oral administration
of a single 1,000 mg dose of azithromycin, mean Cmax and AUC0-120 increased
by 5.1% and 4.2%, respectively in subjects with mild to moderate renal impairment
(GFR 10 to 80 mL/min) compared to subjects with normal renal function (GFR >
80 mL/min). The mean Cmax and AUC0-120 increased 61% and 35%, respectively
in subjects with severe renal impairment (GFR < 10 mL/min) compared to subjects
with normal renal function (GFR > 80 mL/min). (See DOSAGE
AND ADMINISTRATION.)
Hepatic Insufficiency
The pharmacokinetics of azithromycin
in subjects with hepatic impairment have not been established.
Gender
There are no significant differences in the
disposition of azithromycin between male and female subjects. No dosage
adjustment is recommended based on gender.
Geriatric Patients
Pharmacokinetic studies with intravenous
azithromycin have not been performed in older volunteers. Pharmacokinetics of
azithromycin following oral administration in older volunteers (65-85 years
old) were similar to those in younger volunteers (18-40 years old) for the
5-day therapeutic regimen.
Pediatric Patients
Pharmacokinetic studies with intravenous
azithromycin have not been performed in children.
Drug-Drug Interactions
Drug interaction studies were
performed with oral azithromycin and other drugs likely to be coadministered.
The effects of co-administration of azithromycin on the pharmacokinetics of
other drugs are shown in Table 1 and the effect of other drugs on the
pharmacokinetics of azithromycin are shown in Table 2.
Co-administration of azithromycin at therapeutic doses had a
modest effect on the pharmacokinetics of the drugs listed in Table 1. No dosage
adjustment of drugs listed in Table 1 is recommended when coadministered with
azithromycin.
Co-administration of azithromycin with efavirenz or fluconazole had a modest
effect on the pharmacokinetics of azithromycin. Nelfinavir significantly increased
the Cmax and AUC of azithromycin. No dosage adjustment of azithromycin is recommended
when administered with drugs listed in Table 2. (See PRECAUTIONS - DRUG
INTERACTIONS.)
Table 1. Drug Interactions: Pharmacokinetic Parameters for
Co-administered Drugs in the Presence of Azithromycin
| Co-administered Drug |
Dose of Coadministered Drug |
Dose of Azithromycin |
n |
Ratio (with/without azithromycin of Co-administered Drug Pharmacokinetic Parameters
(90% CI);
No Effect = 1.00 |
| Mean Cmax |
Mean AUC |
| Atorvastatin |
10 mg/day × 8 days |
500 mg/day PO on days 6-8 |
12 |
0.83 (0.63 to 1.08) |
1.01 (0.81 to 1.25) |
| Carbamazepine |
200 mg/day × 2 days, then 200 mg BID × 18 days |
500 mg/day PO for days 16-18 |
7 |
0.97 (0.88 to 1.06) |
0.96 (0.88 to 1.06) |
| Cetirizine |
20 mg/day × 11 days |
500 mg PO on day 7, then 250 mg/day on days 8-11 |
14 |
1.03 (0.93 to 1.14) |
1.02 (0.92 to 1.13) |
| Didanosine |
200 mg PO BID × 21 days |
1,200 mg/day PO on days 8-21 |
6 |
1.44 (0.85 to 2.43) |
1.14 (0.83 to 1.57) |
| Efavirenz |
400 mg/day × 7 days |
600 mg PO on day 7 |
14 |
1.04* |
0.95* |
| Fluconazole |
200 mg PO single dose |
1,200 mg PO single dose |
18 |
1.04 (0.98 to 1.11) |
1.01 (0.97 to 1.05) |
| Indinavir |
800 mg TID × 5 days |
1,200 mg PO on day 5 |
18 |
0.96 (0.86 to 1.08) |
0.90 (0.81 to 1.00) |
| Midazolam |
15 mg PO on day 3 |
500 mg/day PO × 3 days |
12 |
1.27 (0.89 to 1.81) |
1.26 (1.01 to 1.56) |
| Nelfinavir |
750 mg TID × 11 days |
1,200 mg PO on day 9 |
14 |
0.90 (0.81 to 1.01) |
0.85 (0.78 to 0.93) |
| Rifabutin |
300 mg/day × 10 days |
500 mg PO on day 1, then 250 mg/day on days 2-10 |
6 |
See footnote below |
NA |
| Sildenafil |
100 mg on days 1 and 4 |
500 mg/day PO × 3 days |
12 |
1.16 (0.86 to 1.57) |
0.92 (0.75 to 1.12) |
| Theophylline |
4 mg/kg IV on days 1, 11, 25 |
500 mg PO on day 7, 250 mg/day on days 8-11 |
10 |
1.19 (1.02 to 1.40) |
1.02 (0.86 to 1.22) |
| Theophylline |
300 mg PO BID × 15 days |
500 mg PO on day 6, then 250 mg/day on days 7-10 |
8 |
1.09 (0.92 to 1.29) |
1.08 (0.89 to 1.31) |
| Triazolam |
0.125 mg on day 2 |
500 mg PO on day 1, then 250 mg/day on day 2 |
12 |
1.06* |
1.02* |
| Trimethoprim/ Sulfamethoxazole |
160 mg/800 mg/day PO × 7 days |
1,200 mg PO on day 7 |
12 |
0.85 (0.75 to 0.97)/ 0.90 (0.78 to 1.03) |
0.87 (0.80 to 0.95/ 0.96 (0.88 to 1.03) |
| Zidovudine |
500 mg/day PO × 21 days |
600 mg/day PO × 14 days |
5 |
1.12 (0.42 to 3.02) |
0.94 (0.52 to 1.70) |
| Zidovudine |
500 mg/day PO × 21 days |
1,200 mg/day PO × 14 days |
4 |
1.31 (0.43 to 3.97) |
1.30 (0.69 to 2.43) |
NA -Not Available
* - 90% Confidence interval not reported
Mean rifabutin concentrations one-half day after the last dose of rifabutin were 60 ng/mL when co-administered with azithromycin and 71 ng/mL when co-administered with placebo. |
Table 2. Drug Interactions: Pharmacokinetic Parameters
for Azithromycin in the Presence of Coadministered Drugs (See PRECAUTIONS -
DRUG INTERACTIONS.)
| Co-administered Drug |
Dose of Coadministered Drug |
Dose of Azithromycin |
n |
Ratio (with/without co-administered drug) of Azithromycin Pharmacokinetic Parameters (90% CI); No Effect = 1.00 |
| Mean Cmax |
Mean AUC |
| Efavirenz |
400 mg/day × 7 days |
600 mg PO on day 7 |
14 |
1.22 (1.04 to 1.42) |
0.92* |
| Fluconazole |
200 mg PO single dose |
1,200 mg PO single dose |
18 |
0.82 (0.66 to 1.02) |
1.07 (0.94 to 1.22) |
| Nelfinavir |
750 mg TID × 11 days |
1,200 mg PO on day 9 |
14 |
2.36 (1.77 to 3.15) |
2.12 (1.80 to 2.50) |
| Rifabutin |
300 mg/day × 10 days |
500 mg PO on day 1, then 250 mg/day on days 210 |
6 |
See footnote below |
NA |
NA – Not available
* - 90% Confidence interval not reported
Mean azithromycin concentrations one day after the last dose were 53 ng/mL when coadministered with 300 mg daily rifabutin and 49 ng/mL when coadministered with placebo. |
Microbiology
Azithromycin acts by binding to the 50S
ribosomal subunit of susceptible microorganisms and, thus, interfering with
microbial protein synthesis. Nucleic acid synthesis is not affected.
Azithromycin concentrates in phagocytes and fibroblasts as
demonstrated by in vitro incubation techniques. Using such methodology, the
ratio of intracellular to extracellular concentration was > 30 after one hour
incubation. In vivo studies suggest that concentration in phagocytes may
contribute to drug distribution to inflamed tissues.
Azithromycin has been shown to be active against most
isolates of the following microorganisms, both in vitro and in clinical
infections as described in the INDICATIONS AND USAGE section of the package
insert for ZITHROMAX (azithromycin for injection).
Aerobic and facultative gram-positive microorganisms
Staphylococcus aureus
Streptococcus pneumoniae
NOTE: Azithromycin demonstrates cross-resistance with
erythromycin-resistant gram-positive strains. Most strains of Enterococcus
faecalis and methicillin-resistant staphylococci are resistant to azithromycin.
Aerobic and facultative gram-negative microorganisms
Haemophilus influenzae
Moraxella catarrhalis
Neisseria gonorrhoeae
“Other” microorganisms
Chlamydia pneumoniae
Chlamydia trachomatis
Legionella pneumophila
Mycoplasma hominis
Mycoplasma pneumoniae
Beta-lactamase production should have no effect on
azithromycin activity.
Azithromycin has been shown to be active against most strains of the following
microorganisms, both in vitro and in clinical infections as described in the
INDICATIONS AND USAGE section of the package
insert for ZITHROMAX (azithromycin tablets) and ZITHROMAX (azithromycin for
oral suspension).
Aerobic and facultative gram-positive microorganisms
Staphylococcus aureus
Streptococcus agalactiae
Streptococcus pneumoniae
Streptococcus pyogenes
Aerobic and facultative gram-negative microorganisms
Haemophilus ducreyi
Haemophilus influenzae
Moraxella catarrhalis
Neisseria gonorrhoeae
“Other” microorganisms
Chlamydia pneumoniae
Chlamydia trachomatis
Mycoplasma pneumoniae
Beta-lactamase production should have no effect on
azithromycin activity.
The following in vitro data are available, but their
clinical significance is unknown.
At least 90% of the following microorganisms exhibit an in
vitro minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) less than or equal to the
susceptible breakpoints for azithromycin. However, the safety and effectiveness
of azithromycin in treating clinical infections due to these microorganisms
have not been established in adequate and well-controlled clinical trials.
Aerobic and facultative gram-positive microorganisms
Streptococci (Groups C, F, G)
Viridans group streptococci
Aerobic and facultative gram-negative microorganisms
Bordetella pertussis
Anaerobic microorganisms
Peptostreptococcus species
Prevotella bivia
“Other” microorganisms
Ureaplasma urealyticum
Beta-lactamase production should have no effect on
azithromycin activity.
Susceptibility Testing Methods
When available, the results of in vitro susceptibility test
results for antimicrobial drugs used in resident hospitals should be provided
to the physician as periodic reports which describe the susceptibility profile
of nosocomial and community-acquired pathogens. These reports may differ from
susceptibility data obtained from outpatient use, but could aid the physician
in selecting the most effective antimicrobial.
Dilution techniques
Quantitative methods are used to determine antimicrobial
minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs). These MICs provide estimates of the
susceptibility of bacteria to antimicrobial compounds. The MICs should be
determined using a standardized procedure. Standardized procedures are based on
a dilution method1,3 (broth or agar) or equivalent with standardized inoculum
concentrations and standardized concentrations of azithromycin powder. The MIC
values should be interpreted according to criteria provided in Table 1.
Diffusion techniques
Quantitative methods that require measurement of zone
diameters also provide reproducible estimates of the susceptibility of bacteria
to antimicrobial compounds. One such standardized procedure2,3 requires the use
of standardized inoculum concentrations. This procedure uses paper disks
impregnated with 15-μg azithromycin to test the susceptibility of microorganisms
to azithromycin. The disk diffusion interpretive criteria are provided in Table
1.
Table 1. Susceptibility Interpretive Criteria for
Azithromycin Susceptibility Test Result Interpretive Criteria
| Pathogen |
Minimum Inhibitory
Concentrations (μg/mL) |
Disk Diffusion
(zone diameters in mm) |
| S |
I |
Ra |
S |
I |
Ra |
| Haemophilus spp. |
≤ 4 |
-- |
-- |
≥ 12 |
-- |
-- |
| Staphylococcus aureus |
≤ 2 |
4 |
≥ 8 |
≥ 18 |
14-17 |
≤ 13 |
| Streptococci including S. pneumoniaeb |
≤ 0.5 |
1 |
≥ 2 |
≥ 18 |
14-17 |
≤ 13 |
aThe current absence of data on
resistant strains precludes defining any category other than “susceptible”.
If strains yield MIC results other than susceptible, they should be submitted
to a reference laboratory for further testing.
bSusceptibility of streptococci including S. pneumoniae to
azithromycin and other macrolides can be predicted by testing erythromycin.
|
No interpretive criteria have been established for testing
Neisseria gonorrhoeae. This species is not usually tested.
A report of “susceptible” indicates that the pathogen is
likely to be inhibited if the antimicrobial compound reaches the concentrations
usually achievable. A report of “intermediate” indicates that the result should
be considered equivocal, and, if the microorganism is not fully susceptible to
alternative, clinically feasible drugs, the test should be repeated. This
category implies possible clinical applicability in body sites where the drug
is physiologically concentrated or in situations where high dosage of drug can
be used. This category also provides a buffer zone which prevents small
uncontrolled technical factors from causing major discrepancies in
interpretation. A report of “resistant” indicates that the pathogen is not
likely to be inhibited if the antimicrobial compound reaches the concentrations
usually achievable; other therapy should be selected.
Quality Control
Standardized susceptibility test procedures require the use
of quality control microorganisms to control the technical aspects of the test
procedures. Standard azithromycin powder should provide the following range of
values noted in Table 2. Quality control microorganisms are specific strains of
organisms with intrinsic biological properties. QC strains are very stable
strains which will give a standard and repeatable susceptibility pattern. The
specific strains used for microbiological quality control are not clinically
significant.
Table 2. Acceptable Quality Control Ranges for Azithromycin
| QC Strain |
Minimum Inhibitory
Concentrations (μg/mL) |
Disk Diffusion
(zone diameters in mm) |
| Haemophilus influenzae |
| ATCC 49247 |
1.0-4.0 |
13-21 |
| Staphylococcus aureus |
| ATCC 29213 |
0.5-2.0 |
|
| Staphylococcus aureus |
| ATCC 25923 |
|
21-26 |
| Streptococcus pneumoniae |
| ATCC 49619 |
0.06-0.25 |
19-25 |
Clinical Studies
Community-Acquired Pneumonia
In a controlled study of community-acquired pneumonia
performed in the U.S., azithromycin (500 mg as a single daily dose by the
intravenous route for 2-5 days, followed by 500 mg/day by the oral route to
complete 7-10 days therapy) was compared to cefuroxime (2250 mg/day in three
divided doses by the intravenous route for 2-5 days followed by 1000 mg/day in
two divided doses by the oral route to complete 7-10 days therapy), with or
without erythromycin. For the 291 patients who were evaluable for clinical
efficacy, the clinical outcome rates, i.e., cure, improved, and success (cure +
improved) among the 277 patients seen at 10-14 days post-therapy were as
follows:
| Clinical Outcome |
Azithromycin |
Comparator |
| Cure |
46% |
44% |
| Improved |
32% |
30% |
| Success (Cure + Improved) |
78% |
74% |
In a separate, uncontrolled clinical and microbiological
trial performed in the U.S., 94 patients with community-acquired pneumonia who
received azithromycin in the same regimen were evaluable for clinical efficacy.
The clinical outcome rates, i.e., cure, improved, and success (cure + improved)
among the 84 patients seen at 10-14 days post-therapy were as follows:
| Clinical Outcome |
Azithromycin |
| Cure |
60% |
| Improved |
29% |
| Success (Cure + Improved) |
89% |
Microbiological determinations in both trials were made at
the pre-treatment visit and, where applicable, were reassessed at later visits.
Serological testing was done on baseline and final visit specimens. The
following combined presumptive bacteriological eradication rates were obtained
from the evaluable groups:
Combined Bacteriological Eradication Rates for Azithromycin:
| (at last completed visit) |
Azithromycin |
| S. pneumoniae |
64/67 (96%)a |
| H. influenzae |
41/43 (95%) |
| M. catarrhalis |
9/10 |
| S. aureus |
9/10 |
| a Nineteen of twenty-four patients (79%) with positive blood cultures for S. pneumoniae were cured (intent to treat analysis) with eradication of the pathogen. |
The presumed bacteriological outcomes at 10-14 days
post-therapy for patients treated with azithromycin with evidence (serology
and/or culture) of atypical pathogens for both trials were as follows:
| Evidence of Infection |
Total |
Cure |
Improved |
Cure + Improved |
| Mycoplasma pneumoniae |
18 |
11 (61%) |
5 (28%) |
16 (89%) |
| Chlamydia pneumoniae |
34 |
15 (44%) |
13 (38%) |
28 (82%) |
| Legionella pneumophila |
16 |
5 (31%) |
8 (50%) |
13 (81%) |
Animal Toxicology
Phospholipidosis (intracellular phospholipid accumulation)
has been observed in some tissues of mice, rats, and dogs given multiple doses
of azithromycin. It has been demonstrated in numerous organ systems (e.g., eye,
dorsal root ganglia, liver, gallbladder, kidney, spleen, and pancreas) in dogs
treated with azithromycin at doses which, expressed on the basis of mg/m², are
approximately equal to the recommended adult human dose, and in rats treated at
doses approximately one-sixth of the recommended adult human dose. This effect
has been shown to be reversible after cessation of azithromycin treatment. Phospholipidosis
has been observed to a similar extent in the tissues of neonatal rats and dogs
given daily doses of azithromycin ranging from 10 days to 30 days. Based on the
pharmacokinetic data, phospholipidosis has been seen in the rat (30 mg/kg dose)
at observed Cmax value of 1.3 μg/mL (six times greater than the observed
Cmax of 0.216 μg/mL at the pediatric dose of 10 mg/kg). Similarly, it has
been shown in the dog (10 mg/kg dose) at observed Cmax value of 1.5 μg/mL
(seven times greater than the observed same Cmax and drug dose in the studied
pediatric population). On a mg/m² basis, 30 mg/kg dose in the neonatal rat (135
mg/m²) and 10 mg/kg dose in the neonatal dog (79 mg/m²) are approximately 0.45
and 0.3 times, respectively, the recommended dose in the pediatric patients
with an average body weight of 25 kg. Phospholipidosis, similar to that seen in
the adult animals, is reversible after cessation of azithromycin treatment. The
significance of these findings for animals and for humans is unknown.
REFERENCES
1. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards,
Methods for Dilution Antimicrobial Susceptibility Tests for Bacteria That Grow
Aerobically – Fifth Edition. Approved Standard NCCLS Document M7-A5, Vol. 20,
No. 2 (ISBN 1-56238-394-9). NCCLS, 940 West Valley Road, Suite 1400, Wayne, PA 19087-1898, January, 2000.
2. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards,
Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Disk Susceptibility Tests - Seventh
Edition. Approved Standard NCCLS Document M2-A7, Vol. 20, No. 1 (ISBN
1-56238-393-0). NCCLS, 940 West Valley Road, Suite 1400, Wayne, PA 190871898, January, 2000.
3. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards.
Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing – Eleventh
Informational Supplement. NCCLS Document M100-S11, Vol. 21, No. 1 (ISBN 1-56238-426-0). NCCLS, 940 West Valley Road,
Suite 1400, Wayne, PA 190871898, January, 2001.
Last updated on RxList: 4/27/2009