Mechanism of Action
Azithromycin is an antimicrobial agent.
Pharmacodynamics
Based on animal models of infection, the antimicrobial activity of azithromycin
appears to correlate with the ratio of area under the concentration-time curve
to minimum inhibitory concentration (AUC/MIC) for certain pathogens (S. pneumoniae
and S. aureus). The principal pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic parameter
best associated with clinical and microbiological cure has not been elucidated
in clinical trials with Zmax.
Pharmacokinetics
Zmax is an extended release microsphere formulation. Based on data obtained
from studies evaluating the pharmacokinetics of azithromycin in healthy adult
subjects a higher peak serum concentration (Cmax) and greater systemic exposure
(AUC 0-24) of azithromycin are achieved on the day of dosing following a single
2 g dose of Zmax versus 1.5 g of azithromycin tablets administered over 3 days
(500 mg/day) or 5 days (500 mg on day 1, 250 mg/day on days 2-5) [Table 2].
Consequently, due to these different pharmacokinetic profiles, Zmax is not interchangeable
with azithromycin tablet 3-day and 5-day dosing regimens.
Table 2. Mean (SD) Pharmacokinetic Parameters for Azithromycin
on Day 1 Following the Administration of a Single Dose of 2 g Zmax or 1.5 g
of Azithromycin Tablets Given over 3 Days (500 mg/day) or 5 Days (500 mg on
Day 1 and 250 mg on Days 2-5) to Healthy Adult Subjects
| |
Azithromycin Regimen |
Pharmacokinetic
Parameter* |
Zmax
[N=41]† |
3-day ‡
[N=12] |
5-day ‡
[N=12] |
| Cmax (μ g/mL) |
0.821
(0.281) |
0.441
(0.223) |
0.434
(0.202) |
| Tmax § (hr) |
5.0
(2.0-8.0) |
2.5
(1.0-4.0) |
2.5
(1.0-6.0) |
AUC0-24
(μ g•hr/mL) |
8.62
(2.34) |
2.58
(0.84) |
2.60
(0.71) |
AUC0-∞ ¶
(μ g•hr/mL) |
20.0
(6.66) |
17.4
(6.2) |
14.9
(3.1) |
| t½ (hr) |
58.8
(6.91) |
71.8
(14.7) |
68.9
(13.8) |
* Zmax, 3-day and 5-day regimen parameters
obtained from separate pharmacokinetic studies
† N = 21 for AUC0-∞ and t1/2
‡ Cmax, Tmax and AUC0-24 values for Day 1 only
§ Median (range)
¶ Total AUC for the 1-day, 3-day and 5-day regimens
SD = standard deviation
Cmax = maximum serum concentration
Tmax = time to Cmax
AUC = area under concentration vs. time curve
t½ = terminal serum half-life |
Absorption
The bioavailability of Zmax relative to azithromycin immediate release (IR)
(powder for oral suspension) was 83%. On average, peak serum concentrations
were achieved approximately 2.5 hours later following Zmax administration and
were lower by 57%, compared to 2 g azithromycin IR. Thus, single 2 g doses of
Zmax and azithromycin IR are not bioequivalent and are not interchangeable.
Effect of food on absorption: A high-fat meal increased the rate and
extent of absorption of a 2 g dose of Zmax (115% increase in Cmax, and 23% increase
in AUC0-72) compared to the fasted state. A standard meal also increased
the rate of absorption (119% increase in Cmax) and with less effect on the extent
of absorption (12% increase in AUC0-72) compared to administration of a 2 g
Zmax dose in the fasted state.
Effect of antacids: Following the administration of Zmax with an aluminum
and magnesium hydroxide antacid, the rate and extent of azithromycin absorption
were not altered.
Distribution
The serum protein binding of azithromycin is concentration dependent, decreasing
from 51% at 0.02 μg/mL to 7% at 2 μg/mL. Following oral administration,
azithromycin is widely distributed throughout the body with an apparent steady-state
volume of distribution of 31.1 L/kg.
Azithromycin concentrates in fibroblasts, epithelial cells, macrophages, and
circulating neutrophils and monocytes. Higher azithromycin concentrations in
tissues than in plasma or serum have been observed. White blood cell and lung
exposure data in humans following a single 2 g dose of Zmax in adults are shown
in Table 3. Following a 2 g single dose of Zmax, azithromycin achieved higher
exposure (AUC0-120) in mononuclear leukocytes (MNL) and polymorphonuclear
leukocytes (PMNL) than in serum. The azithromycin exposure (AUC0-72)
in lung tissue and alveolar cells (AC) was approximately 100 times that in serum;
and the exposure in epithelial lining fluid (ELF) was also higher (approximately
2-3 times) than in serum. The clinical significance of this distribution data
is unknown.
Table 3. Azithromycin Exposure Data in White Blood Cells
and Lung Following a 2g Single Dose of Zmax in Adults
| A single 2g dose of Zmax |
| WBC |
Cmax (μ g/mL) |
AUC0-24 (μg•hr/mL) |
AUC0-120 (μg•hr/mL) |
Ct=120† (μ g/mL) |
| MNL‡ |
116 (40.2) |
1790 (540) |
4710 (1100) |
16.2 (5.51) |
| PMNL‡ |
146 (66.0) |
2080 (650) |
10000 (2690) |
81.7 (23.3) |
| LUNG |
Cmax (μ g/mL) |
AUC0-24 (μg•hr/mL) |
AUC0-72 (μg•hr/mL) |
|
| ALVEOLAR CELL¶ |
669 |
7028 |
20403 |
- |
| ELF¶ |
3.2 |
17.6 |
131 |
- |
| |
Cmax (μg/g) |
AUC0-24 (μg•hr/g) |
AUC0-72 (μg•hr/g) |
|
| LUNG TISSUE¶ |
37.9 |
505 |
1693 |
- |
Abbreviation: WBC: white blood cells; MNL:
mononuclear leukocytes; PMNL: polymorphonuclear leukocytes; ELF: Epithelial
lining fluid
† Azithromycin concentration at 120 hours after the start of dosing
‡ Data are presented as mean (standard deviation)
¶ Cmax and AUC were calculated based on composite profile (n = 4
subjects/time point/formulation). |
Following a regimen of 500 mg of azithromycin tablets on the first day and
250 mg daily for 4 days, only very low concentrations were noted in cerebrospinal
fluid (less than 0.01 μg/mL) in the presence of non-inflamed meninges.
Metabolism
In vitroand in vivo studies to assess the metabolism of azithromycin
have not been performed.
Excretion
Serum azithromycin concentrations following a single 2 g dose of Zmax declined
in a polyphasic pattern with a terminal elimination half-life of 59 hours. The
prolonged terminal half-life is thought to be due to a large apparent volume
of distribution.
Biliary excretion of azithromycin, predominantly as unchanged drug, is a major
route of elimination. Over the course of a week, approximately 6% of the administered
dose appears as unchanged drug in urine.
Special Populations
Renal Impairment
Azithromycin pharmacokinetics were investigated in 42 adults (21 to 85 years
of age) with varying degrees of renal impairment. Following the oral administration
of a single 1.0 g dose of azithromycin (4 x 250 mg capsules), the mean Cmax
and AUC0-120 were 5.1% and 4.2% higher, respectively in subjects with GFR 10
to 80 mL/min compared to subjects with normal renal function (GFR > 80 mL/min).
The mean Cmax and AUC0-120 were 61% and 35% higher, respectively in subjects
with GFR < 10 mL/min compared to subjects with normal renal function. (See
Renal Impairment.)
Hepatic Impairment
The pharmacokinetics of azithromycin in subjects with hepatic impairment has
not been established.
Pediatric Patients
The pharmacokinetics of azithromycin were characterized following a single
60 mg/kg dose of Zmax in pediatric patients aged 3 months to 16 years. Although
there was high inter-patient variability in systemic exposure (AUC and Cmax)
across the age groups studied, individual azithromycin AUC and Cmax values in
pediatric patients were comparable to or higher than those following administration
of 2 g Zmax in adults (Table 4). (See Pediatric Use.)
Table 4. Mean (SD) Pharmacokinetic Parameters for Azithromycin
Following Administration of a Single Dose of Zmax (60 mg/kg, maximum dose of
2 g) to Pediatric Subjects Aged 3 Months to 16 Years
| Treatment Group |
Pharmacokinetic Parameters |
Cmax
(μ g/mL) |
Tmax*
(hr) |
AUC(0-24)
(μ g•hr/mL) |
AUC(0-∞ )
(μ g•hr/mL) |
Group 1 (N = 6)
[3 to 18 months] |
0.74 (0.20) |
3 (3-3) |
6.29 (1.17) |
14.1 (2.16)
(n = 3) |
Group 2† (N = 6)
[ > 18 to 36 months] |
1.88† (0.50) |
3 (3-3) |
19.7† (5.35) |
37.3 (12.9)
(n = 5) |
Group 3 (N = 6)
[ > 36 to 48 months] |
1.23 (0.42) |
3 (3-6) |
12.9 (3.79) |
22.4 (5.96) |
Group 4 (N = 6)
[ > 48 months to 8 years] |
1.13 (0.34) |
3 (3-6) |
13.0 (4.21) |
22.2 (6.89) |
Group 5 (N = 6)
[ > 8 to 12 years] |
1.65 (0.38) |
3 (3-6) |
16.0 (4.99) |
30.1 (10.7) |
Group 6 (N = 6)
[ > 12 to 16 years] |
0.98 (0.35) |
3 (3-6) |
11.0 (4.78) |
21.3 (9.37) |
Pooled 1-6 (N = 36)
[On an empty stomach] |
1.27 (0.53) |
3 (3-6) |
13.1 (5.78) |
25.2 (10.7)
(n = 32) |
Group 7‡ (N = 7)
[Fed; 18 months to 8 years] |
1.41 (0.62) |
3 (1.5-3.1) |
7.43 (3.00) |
18.9 (3.57)
(n = 3) |
Empty stomach = dosed with Zmax at least
1 hour before or 2 hours after a meal (Groups I-VI) Fed = dosed with Zmax
within 5 minutes of consuming an age-appropriate high-fat breakfast (Group
VII)
* Median (range) presented only for Tmax
† High mean values were driven by 2 subjects with high exposure
‡ One subject vomited immediately after dosing and discontinued
from the study |
Gender
The impact of gender on the pharmacokinetics of azithromycin has not been evaluated
for Zmax. However, previous studies have demonstrated no significant differences
in the disposition of azithromycin between male and female subjects.
Pharmacokinetic Interaction Studies
A drug interaction study was performed with Zmax and antacids. All other drug
interaction studies were performed with azithromycin immediate release (IR)
formulations (capsules and tablets, doses ranging from 500 to 1200 mg) and other
drugs likely to be co-administered. The effects of coadministration of azithromycin
on the pharmacokinetics of other drugs are shown in Table 5 and the effects
of other drugs on the pharmacokinetics of azithromycin are shown in Table 6.
When used at therapeutic doses, azithromycin IR had a minimal effect on the
pharmacokinetics of atorvastatin, carbamazepine, cetirizine, didanosine, efavirenz,
fluconazole, indinavir, midazolam, nelfinavir, sildenafil, theophylline (intravenous
and oral), triazolam, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole or zidovudine (Table 5).
Although the drug interaction studies were not conducted with Zmax, similar
modest effect as observed with IR formulation are expected since the total exposure
to azithromycin is comparable for Zmax and other azithromycin IR regimens. Therefore,
no dosage adjustment of drugs listed in Table 5 is recommended when co-administered
with Zmax.
Nelfinavir significantly increased the Cmax and AUC of azithromycin following
co-administration with azithromycin IR 1200 mg (Table 6). However, no dose adjustment
of azithromycin is recommended when Zmax is co-administered with nelfinavir.
Pharmacokinetic and/or pharmacodynamic interactions with the drugs listed below
have not been reported in clinical trials with azithromycin; however, no specific
drug interaction studies have been performed to evaluate potential drug-drug
interaction. Nonetheless, pharmacokinetic and/or pharmacodynamic interactions
with these drugs have been observed with other macrolide products. Until further
data are developed, careful monitoring of patients is advised when azithromycin
and these drugs are used concomitantly: digoxin, ergotamine or dihydroergotamine,
cyclosporine, hexobarbital and phenytoin.
Table 5. Drug Interactions: Pharmacokinetic Parameters of
Co-administered Drugs in the Presence of Azithromycin
| Co-administered Drug |
Dose of Coadministered
Drug |
Dose of Azithromycin* |
n |
Ratio (with/without Azithromycin) of Co-administered Drug
Pharmacokinetic Parameters (90% CI);
No Effect = 1.00 |
| Mean Cmax |
Mean AUC |
| Atorvastatin |
10 mg/day × 8 days |
500 mg/day PO on days 6-8 |
12 |
0.83
(0.63 to 1.08) |
1.01
(0.81 to 1.25) |
| Carbamazepine |
200 mg/day × 2 days, then 200 mg BID × 18 days |
500 mg/day PO for days 16-18 |
7 |
0.97
(0.88 to 1.06) |
0.96
(0.88 to 1.06) |
| Cetirizine |
20 mg/day × 11 days |
500 mg PO on day 7, then 250 mg/day on days 8-11 |
14 |
1.03
(0.93 to 1.14) |
1.02
(0.92 to 1.13) |
| Didanosine |
200 mg PO BID × 21 days |
1,200 mg/day PO on days 8-21 |
6 |
1.44
(0.85 to 2.43) |
1.14
(0.83 to 1.57) |
| Efavirenz |
400 mg/day × 7 days |
600 mg PO on day 7 |
14 |
1.04† |
0.95† |
| Fluconazole |
200 mg PO single dose |
1,200 mg PO single dose |
18 |
1.04
(0.98 to 1.11) |
1.01
(0.97 to 1.05) |
| Indinavir |
800 mg TID × 5 days |
1,200 mg PO on day 5 |
18 |
0.96
(0.86 to 1.08) |
0.90
(0.81 to 1.00) |
| Midazolam |
15 mg PO on day 3 |
500 mg/day PO × 3 days |
12 |
1.27
(0.89 to 1.81) |
1.26
(1.01 to 1.56) |
| Nelfinavir |
750 mg TID × 11 days |
1,200 mg PO on day 9 |
14 |
0.90
(0.81 to 1.01) |
0.85
(0.78 to 0.93) |
| Sildenafil |
100 mg on days 1 and 4 |
500 mg/day PO × 3days |
12 |
1.16
(0.86 to 1.57) |
0.92
(0.75 to 1.12) |
| Theophylline |
4 mg/kg IV on days 1, 11, 25 |
500 mg PO on day 7, then 250 mg/day on days 8-11 |
10 |
1.19
(1.02 to 1.40) |
1.02
(0.86 to 1.22) |
| Theophylline |
300 mg PO BID × 15 days |
500 mg PO on day 6, then 250 mg/day on days 7-10 |
8 |
1.09
(0.92 to 1.29) |
1.08
(0.89 to 1.31) |
| Triazolam |
0.125 mg on day 2 |
500 mg PO on day 1, then 250 mg/day on day 2 |
12 |
1.06† |
1.02† |
| Trimethoprim/ Sulfamethoxazole |
160 mg/800 mg/day PO × 7days |
1,200 mg PO on day 7 |
12 |
0.85
(0.75 to 0.97)/0.90
(0.78 to 1.03) |
0.87
(0.80 to 0.95)/0.96
(0.88 to 1.03) |
| Zidovudine |
500 mg/day PO × 21 days |
600 mg/day PO ×14 days |
5 |
1.12
(0.42 to 3.02) |
0.94
(0.52 to 1.70) |
| Zidovudine |
500 mg/day PO × 21 days |
1,200 mg/day PO × 14 days |
4 |
1.31
(0.43 to 3.97) |
1.30
(0.69 to 2.43) |
* Refers to azithromycin capsules and tablets
unless specified
† 90% confidence interval not reported |
Table 6. Drug Interactions: Pharmacokinetic Parameters of
Azithromycin in the Presence of Co-administered Drugs
| Co-administered Drug |
Dose of Coadministered Drug |
Dose of Azithromycin* |
n |
Ratio (with/without co-administered drug)
of Azithromycin Pharmacokinetic Parameters (90% CI); No Effect = 1.00 |
| Mean Cmax |
Mean AUC |
| Efavirenz |
400 mg/day × 7days |
600 mg PO on day 7 |
14 |
1.22
(1.04 to 1.42) |
0.92† |
| Fluconazole |
200 mg PO single dose |
1,200 mg PO single dose |
18 |
0.82
(0.66 to 1.02) |
1.07
(0.94 to 1.22) |
| Nelfinavir |
750 mg TID × 11days |
1,200 mg PO on day 9 |
14 |
2.36
(1.77 to 3.15) |
2.12
(1.80 to 2.50) |
| Aluminum and Magnesium hydroxide |
20 mL regular strength, single dose |
2 g Zmax, single dose |
39 |
0.99
(0.93 to 1.06) |
0.99
(0.92 to 1.08) |
* Refers to azithromycin capsules and tablets
unless specified
† 90% confidence interval not reported |
Microbiology
Mechanism of Action
Azithromycin acts by binding to the 50S ribosomal subunit of susceptible microorganisms,
thus interfering with microbial protein synthesis. Nucleic acid synthesis is
not affected.
Spectrum of Activity
Azithromycin has been shown to be active against most isolates of the following
microorganisms, both in vitro and in clinical infections as described
in the INDICATIONS AND USAGE section.
Aerobic and facultative Gram-positive microorganisms
Streptococcus pneumoniae
NOTE: Erythromycin- and penicillin-resistant Gram-positive isolates may demonstrate
crossresistance to azithromycin.
Aerobic and facultative Gram-negative microorganisms
Haemophilus influenzae
Moraxella catarrhalis
Beta-lactamase production should not affect azithromycin activity.
“Other” microorganisms
Chlamydophila pneumoniae
Mycoplasma pneumoniae
The following in vitro data are available, but their clinical significance
is unknown.
At least 90% of the following microorganisms exhibit an in vitro minimum
inhibitory concentration (MIC) less than or equal to the azithromycin susceptible
breakpoints of < 4 μg/mL. However, the safety and effectiveness of azithromycin
in treating clinical infections due to these microorganisms have not been established
in adequate and well-controlled trials.
Aerobic and facultative Gram-positive microorganisms
Staphylococcus aureus
Streptococcus agalactiae
Streptococcus pyogenes
Streptococci (Groups C, F, G)
Viridans group streptococci
Aerobic and facultative Gram-negative microorganisms
Bordetella pertussis
Legionella pneumophila
Anaerobic microorganisms
Peptostreptococcus species
Prevotella bivia
“Other” microorganisms
Ureaplasma urealyticum
Susceptibility Testing Methods
When available, the clinical microbiology laboratory should provide cumulative
results of in vitro susceptibility test results for antimicrobial drugs
used in local hospitals and practice areas to the physician as periodic reports
that describe the susceptibility profile of nosocomial and communityacquired
pathogens. These reports should aid the physician in selecting the most effective
antimicrobial.
Dilution techniques
Quantitative methods are used to determine antimicrobial minimum inhibitory
concentrations (MICs). These MICs provide estimates of the susceptibility of
bacteria to antimicrobial compounds. The MICs should be determined using a standardized
procedure. Standardized procedures are based on a dilution method1,3
(broth or agar) or equivalent with standardized inoculum concentrations and
standardized concentrations of azithromycin powder. The MIC values should be
interpreted according to criteria provided in Table 7.
Diffusion techniques
Quantitative methods that require measurement of zone diameters also provide
reproducible estimates of the susceptibility of bacteria to antimicrobial compounds.
One such standardized procedure2,3 requires the use of standardized
inoculum concentrations. This procedure uses paper disks impregnated with 15-μg
azithromycin to test the susceptibility of microorganisms to azithromycin. The
disk diffusion interpretive criteria are provided in Table 7.
Table 7. Susceptibility Test Result Interpretive Criteria
for Azithromycin
| Pathogen |
Minimum Inhibitory
Concentrations (μ g/mL) |
Disk Diffusion
(zone diameters in mm) |
| S |
I |
R* |
S |
I |
R* |
| Haemophilus influenzae |
≤ 4 |
-- |
-- |
≥ 12 |
-- |
-- |
| Streptococcus pneumoniae |
≤ 0.5 |
1 |
≥ 2 |
≥ 18 |
14-17 |
≤ 13 |
| * The current absence of data on resistant
strains precludes defining any category other than “susceptible.”
If strains yield MIC results other than susceptible, they should be submitted
to a reference laboratory for further testing. |
No interpretive criteria have been established for testing Moraxella catarrhalis.
This species is not usually tested.
A report of “susceptible” indicates that the pathogen is likely
to be inhibited if the antimicrobial compound reaches the concentrations usually
achievable. A report of “intermediate” indicates that the result
should be considered equivocal, and, if the microorganism is not fully susceptible
to alternative, clinically feasible drugs, the test should be repeated. This
category implies possible clinical applicability in body sites where the drug
is physiologically concentrated or in situations where high dosage of drug can
be used. This category also provides a buffer zone, which prevents small uncontrolled
technical factors from causing major discrepancies in interpretation. A report
of “resistant” indicates that the pathogen is not likely to be inhibited
if the antimicrobial compound reaches the concentrations usually achievable;
other therapy should be selected.
Quality Control
Standardized susceptibility test procedures require the use of quality control
microorganisms to determine if the test was performed correctly. Standard azithromycin
powder should provide the range of values noted in Table 8. Quality control
(QC) microorganisms are specific strains of organisms with intrinsic biological
properties. QC strains are very stable strains, which will give a standard and
repeatable susceptibility pattern. The specific strains used for microbiological
quality control are not clinically significant.
Table 8. Acceptable Quality Control Ranges for Azithromycin
| QC Strain |
Minimum Inhibitory
Concentrations (μ g/mL) |
Disk Diffusion
(zone diameters in mm) |
| Haemophilus influenzae ATCC 49247 |
1.0-4.0 |
13-21 |
| Streptococcus pneumoniae ATCC 49619 |
0.06-0.25 |
19-25 |
Nonclinical Toxicology
Carcinogenesis, Mutagenesis, Impairment of Fertility
Long-term studies in animals have not been performed to evaluate carcinogenic
potential. Azithromycin has shown no mutagenic potential in standard laboratory
tests: mouse lymphoma assay, human lymphocyte clastogenic assay, and mouse bone
marrow clastogenic assay. No evidence of impaired fertility due to azithromycin
was found in rats given daily doses up to 10 mg/kg (approximately 0.05 times
the single 2 g oral adult human dose on a mg/m² basis).
Animal Toxicology and/or Pharmacology
Phospholipidosis (intracellular phospholipid accumulation) has been observed
in some tissues of mice, rats, and dogs given multiple doses of azithromycin.
It has been demonstrated in numerous organ systems (e.g., eye, dorsal root ganglia,
liver, gallbladder, kidney, spleen, and/or pancreas) in dogs treated with azithromycin
at doses which, expressed on the basis of mg/m², are approximately onesixth
the recommended adult dose, and in rats treated at doses approximately one-fourth
the recommended adult dose. This effect has been shown to be reversible after
cessation of azithromycin treatment. Based on the pharmacokinetic data, phospholipidosis
has been seen in the rat (50 mg/kg/day dose) at the observed maximal plasma
concentration of 1.3 μg/mL (1.6 times the observed Cmax of 0.821 μg/mL
at the adult dose of 2 g.) Similarly, it has been shown in the dog (10 mg/kg/day
dose) at the observed maximal serum concentration of 1 μg/mL (1.2 times the
observed Cmax of 0.821 μg/mL at the adult dose of 2 g).
Phospholipidosis was also observed in neonatal rats dosed for 18 days at 30
mg/kg/day, which is less than the pediatric dose of 60 mg/kg on a mg/m²
basis, but was not observed in neonatal rats treated for 10 days at 40 mg/kg/day
with mean maximal serum concentrations of 1.86 μg/ml, approximately 1.5 times
the Cmax of 1.27 μg/ml at the pediatric dose. Phospholipidosis has been observed
in neonatal dogs (10 mg/kg/day) at maximum mean whole blood concentrations of
3.54 μg/ml, approximately 3 times the pediatric dose Cmax.
The significance of the finding for animals and for humans is unknown.
Clinical Studies
Acute Bacterial Maxillary Sinusitis
Adult subjects with a diagnosis of acute bacterial maxillary sinusitis were
evaluated in a randomized, double-blind, multicenter study; a maxillary sinus
tap was performed on all subjects at baseline. Clinical evaluations were conducted
for all subjects at the TOC visit, 7 to 14 days post-treatment. Two hundred
seventy (270) subjects were treated with a single 2 g oral dose of Zmax and
268 subjects were treated with levofloxacin, 500 mg orally QD for 10 days. A
subject was considered a cure if signs and symptoms related to the acute infection
had resolved, or if clinical improvement was such that no additional antibiotics
were deemed necessary. The clinical response for the primary population, Clinical
Per Protocol Subjects, is presented below.
| RESPONSE AT TOC |
ZMAX
N = 255 |
LEVOFLOXACIN
N = 254 |
| CURE |
241 (94.5%) |
236 (92.9%) |
| FAILURE |
14 (5.5%) |
18 (7.1%) |
Clinical response by pathogen in the Bacteriologic Per Protocol population
is presented below.
| Pathogen |
Zmax |
Levofloxacin |
| N |
Cure |
N |
Cure |
| S. pneumoniae |
37 |
36 (97.3%) |
39 |
36 (92.3%) |
| H. influenzae |
27 |
26 (96.3%) |
30 |
30 (100.0%) |
| M. catarrhalis |
8 |
8 (100.0%) |
11 |
10 (90.9%) |
Community-Acquired Pneumonia
Adult subjects with a diagnosis of mild-to-moderate community-acquired pneumonia
were evaluated in two, randomized, double-blind, multicenter studies. In both
studies, clinical and microbiologic evaluations were conducted for all subjects
at the Test of Cure (TOC) visit, 7 to 14 days posttreatment. In the first study,
247 subjects were treated with a single 2 g oral dose of Zmax and 252 subjects
were treated with clarithromycin extended release, 1 g orally QD for 7 days.
In the second study, 211 subjects were treated with a single 2.0 g oral dose
of Zmax and 212 subjects were treated with levofloxacin, 500 mg orally QD for
7 days. A patient was considered a cure if signs and symptoms related to the
acute infection had resolved, or if clinical improvement was such that no additional
antibiotics were deemed necessary; in addition, the chest x-ray performed at
the TOC visit was to be either improved or stable. The clinical response at
TOC for the primary population, Clinical Per Protocol Subjects, is presented
in the table below.
| ZMAX VS. CLARITHROMYCIN EXTENDED RELEASE |
ZMAX
N=202 |
COMPARATOR
N=209 |
| CURE |
187 (92.6%) |
198 (94.7%) |
| FAILURE |
15 (7.4%) |
11 (5.3%) |
| ZMAX VS. LEVOFLOXACIN |
N=174 |
N=189 |
| CURE |
156 (89.7%) |
177 (93.7%) |
| FAILURE |
18 (10.3%) |
12 (6.3%) |
Clinical response by pathogen in the Bacteriologic Per Protocol population,
across both studies, is presented below:
| Pathogen |
Zmax |
Comparators |
| N |
Cure |
N |
Cure |
| S. pneumoniae |
33 |
28 (84.8%) |
39 |
35 (89.7%) |
| H. influenzae |
30 |
28 (93.3%) |
34 |
31 (91.2%) |
| C. pneumoniae |
40 |
37 (92.5%) |
53 |
50 (94.3%) |
| M. pneumoniae |
33 |
30 (90.9%) |
39 |
38 (97.4%) |
REFERENCES
1. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Methods for
Dilution Antimicrobial Susceptibility Tests for Bacteria That Grow Aerobically;
Approved Standard – Seventh Edition. 2006. CLSI Document M7-A7 [ISBN 1-56238-587-9].
CLSI, 940 West Valley Road, Suite 1400, Wayne, Pennsylvania 19087-1898 USA,
2006.
2. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Performance
Standards for Antimicrobial Disk Susceptibility Tests; Approved Standard – Ninth
Edition. CLSI Document M2-A9 (ISBN 1-56238-5860). CLSI, 940 West Valley
Road, Suite 1400, Wayne, Pennsylvania 19087-1898 USA, 2006.
3. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Performance
Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing; Eighteenth Informational
Supplement. 2008. CLSI Document M100-S18 [ISBN 1-56238-653-0]. CLSI, 940
West Valley Road, Suite 1400, Wayne, Pennsylvania 19087-1898 USA, 2008.
Last updated on RxList: 11/4/2008