Mechanism of Action
Simvastatin is a prodrug and is hydrolyzed to its active β-hydroxyacid
form, simvastatin acid, after administration. Simvastatin is a specific inhibitor
of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase, the enzyme that
catalyzes the conversion of HMG-CoA to mevalonate, an early and rate limiting
step in the biosynthetic pathway for cholesterol. In addition, simvastatin reduces
VLDL and TG and increases HDL-C.
Pharmacodynamics
Epidemiological studies have demonstrated that elevated levels of total-C,
LDL-C, as well as decreased levels of HDL-C are associated with the development
of atherosclerosis and increased cardiovascular risk. Lowering LDL-C decreases
this risk. However, the independent effect of raising HDL-C or lowering TG on
the risk of coronary and cardiovascular morbidity and mortality has not been
determined.
Pharmacokinetics
Simvastatin is a lactone that is readily hydrolyzed in vivo to the corresponding
β-hydroxyacid, a potent inhibitor of HMG-CoA reductase. Inhibition of HMG-CoA
reductase is the basis for an assay in pharmacokinetic studies of the β-hydroxyacid
metabolites (active inhibitors) and, following base hydrolysis, active plus
latent inhibitors (total inhibitors) in plasma following administration of simvastatin.
Following an oral dose of 14C-labeled simvastatin in man, 13% of
the dose was excreted in urine and 60% in feces. Plasma concentrations of total
radioactivity (simvastatin plus 14C-metabolites) peaked at 4 hours
and declined rapidly to about 10% of peak by 12 hours postdose. Since simvastatin
undergoes extensive first-pass extraction in the liver, the availability of
the drug to the general circulation is low ( < 5%).
Both simvastatin and its β-hydroxyacid metabolite are highly bound (approximately
95%) to human plasma proteins. Rat studies indicate that when radiolabeled simvastatin
was administered, simvastatinderived radioactivity crossed the blood-brain
barrier.
The major active metabolites of simvastatin present in human plasma are the
β-hydroxyacid of simvastatin and its 6'-hydroxy, 6'-hydroxymethyl, and
6'β-exomethylene derivatives. Peak plasma concentrations of both active
and total inhibitors were attained within 1.3 to 2.4 hours postdose. While the
recommended therapeutic dose range is 5 to 80 mg/day, there was no substantial
deviation from linearity of AUC of inhibitors in the general circulation with
an increase in dose to as high as 120 mg. Relative to the fasting state, the
plasma profile of inhibitors was not affected when simvastatin was administered
immediately before an American Heart Association recommended low-fat meal.
In a study including 16 elderly patients between 70 and 78 years of age who
received ZOCOR 40 mg/day, the mean plasma level of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitory
activity was increased approximately 45% compared with 18 patients between 18-30
years of age. Clinical study experience in the elderly (n=1522), suggests that
there were no overall differences in safety between elderly and younger patients
[see Use in Specific Populations].
Kinetic studies with another statin, having a similar principal route of elimination,
have suggested that for a given dose level higher systemic exposure may be achieved
in patients with severe renal insufficiency (as measured by creatinine clearance).
Although the mechanism is not fully understood, cyclosporine has been shown
to increase the AUC of statins. The increase in AUC for simvastatin acid is
presumably due, in part, to inhibition of CYP3A4.
The risk of myopathy is increased by high levels of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitory
activity in plasma. Inhibitors of CYP3A4 can raise the plasma levels of HMG-CoA
reductase inhibitory activity and increase the risk of myopathy [See WARNINGS
and PRECAUTIONS and DRUG
INTERACTIONS].
TABLE 3: Effect of Co-Administered Drugs or Grapefruit Juice
on Simvastatin Systemic Exposure
Co-Administered Drug
or Grapefruit Juice |
Dosing of Co-
Administered Drug or
Grapefruit Juice |
Dosing of Simvastatin |
Geometric Mean Ratio
(Ratio* with / without
co-administered drug)
No Effect= 1.00 |
| |
AUC |
Cmax |
| Avoid taking with simvastatin [see WARNINGS and PRECAUTIONS] |
| Telithromycin† |
200 mg QD for 4 days |
80 mg |
simvastatin acid‡ simvastatin |
12
8.9 |
15
5.3 |
| Nelfinavir† |
1250 mg BID for 14 days |
20 mg QD for 28 days |
simvastatin acid‡ simvastatin |
6 |
6.2 |
| Itraconazole† |
200 mg QD for 4 days |
80 mg |
simvastatin acid‡ simvastatin |
|
13.1
13.1 |
| Avoid > 1 quart of grapefruit juice with simvastatin
[see WARNINGS and PRECAUTIONS] |
| Grapefruit Juice§ (high dose) |
200 mL of double-strength TID¶ |
60 mg single dose |
simvastatin acid simvastatin |
7
16 |
|
| Grapefruit Juice§ (low dose) |
8 oz (about 237mL) of single-strength# |
20 mg single dose |
simvastatin acid simvastatin |
1.3
1.9 |
|
| Avoid taking with > 10 mg simvastatin, based on clinical
and/or post-marketing experience [see WARNINGS and PRECAUTIONS] |
| Gemfibrozil |
600 mg BID for 3 days |
40 mg |
simvastatin acid simvastatin |
2.85
1.35 |
2.18
0.91 |
| Avoid taking with > 20 mg simvastatin, based on clinical
and/or post-marketing experience [see WARNINGS and PRECAUTIONS] |
| Verapamil SR |
240 mg QD Days 1-7 then
240 mg BID on Days 8-10 |
80 mg on Day 10 |
simvastatin acid
simvastatin |
2.3
2.5 |
2.4
2.1 |
| No dosing adjustments required for the following: |
| Fenofibrate |
160 mg QD X 14 days |
80 mg QD on Days
8-14 |
simvastatin acid simvastatin |
0.64
0.89 |
0.89
0.83 |
| Niacin extended-release |
2 g single dose |
20 mg single dose |
simvastatin acid simvastatin |
1.6
1.4 |
1.84
1.08 |
| Diltiazem |
120 mg BID for 10 days |
80 mg on Day 10 |
simvastatin acid simvastatin |
2.69
3.10 |
2.69
2.88 |
| Amlodipine |
10 mg QD x 10 days |
80 mg on Day 10 |
simvastatin acid simvastatin |
1.58
1.77 |
1.56
1.47 |
| Propranolol |
80 mg single dose |
80 mg single dose |
total inhibitor |
0.79 |
from 33.6 to 21.1 ng•eq/ml |
| |
|
active inhibitor |
0.79 |
from 7.0 to 4.7 ng•eq/mL |
* Results based on a chemical assay except
results with propranolol as indicated.
† Results could be representative of the following CYP3A4
inhibitors: ketoconazole, erythromycin, clarithromycin, HIV protease inhibitors,
and nefazodone.
‡Simvastatin acid refers to the β-hydroxyacid of
simvastatin.
&set; The effect of amounts of grapefruit juice between those
used in these two studies on simvastatin pharmacokinetics has not been
studied.
¶ Double-strength: one can of frozen concentrate diluted
with one can of water. Grapefruit juice was administered TID for 2 days,
and 200 mL together with single dose simvastatin and 30 and 90 minutes
following single dose simvastatin on Day 3.
#Single-strength: one can of frozen concentrate diluted with
3 cans of water. Grapefruit juice was administered with breakfast for
3 days, and simvastatin was administered in the evening on Day 3. |
In a study of 12 healthy volunteers, simvastatin at the 80-mg dose had no effect
on the metabolism of the probe cytochrome P450 isoform 3A4 (CYP3A4) substrates
midazolam and erythromycin. This indicates that simvastatin is not an inhibitor
of CYP3A4, and, therefore, is not expected to affect the plasma levels of other
drugs metabolized by CYP3A4.
Coadministration of simvastatin (40 mg QD for 10 days) resulted in an increase
in the maximum mean levels of cardioactive digoxin (given as a single 0.4 mg
dose on day 10) by approximately 0.3 ng/mL.
Animal Toxicology and/or Pharmacology
CNS Toxicity
Optic nerve degeneration was seen in clinically normal dogs treated with simvastatin
for 14 weeks at 180 mg/kg/day, a dose that produced mean plasma drug levels
about 12 times higher than the mean plasma drug level in humans taking 80 mg/day.
A chemically similar drug in this class also produced optic nerve degeneration
(Wallerian degeneration of retinogeniculate fibers) in clinically normal dogs
in a dose-dependent fashion starting at 60 mg/kg/day, a dose that produced mean
plasma drug levels about 30 times higher than the mean plasma drug level in
humans taking the highest recommended dose (as measured by total enzyme inhibitory
activity). This same drug also produced vestibulocochlear Wallerian-like degeneration
and retinal ganglion cell chromatolysis in dogs treated for 14 weeks at 180
mg/kg/day, a dose that resulted in a mean plasma drug level similar to that
seen with the 60 mg/kg/day dose.
CNS vascular lesions, characterized by perivascular hemorrhage and edema, mononuclear
cell infiltration of perivascular spaces, perivascular fibrin deposits and necrosis
of small vessels were seen in dogs treated with simvastatin at a dose of 360
mg/kg/day, a dose that produced mean plasma drug levels that were about 14 times
higher than the mean plasma drug levels in humans taking 80 mg/day. Similar
CNS vascular lesions have been observed with several other drugs of this class.
There were cataracts in female rats after two years of treatment with 50 and
100 mg/kg/day (22 and 25 times the human AUC at 80 mg/day, respectively) and
in dogs after three months at 90 mg/kg/day (19 times) and at two years at 50
mg/kg/day (5 times).
Clinical Studies
Clinical Studies in Adults
Reductions in Risk of CHD Mortality and Cardiovascular Events
In 4S, the effect of therapy with ZOCOR on total mortality was assessed in
4,444 patients with CHD and baseline total cholesterol 212-309 mg/dL (5.5-8.0
mmol/L). In this multicenter, randomized, double- blind, placebo-controlled
study, patients were treated with standard care, including diet, and either
ZOCOR 20-40 mg/day (n=2,221) or placebo (n=2,223) for a median duration of 5.4
years. Over the course of the study, treatment with ZOCOR led to mean reductions
in total-C, LDL-C and TG of 25%, 35%, and 10%, respectively, and a mean increase
in HDL-C of 8%. ZOCOR significantly reduced the risk of mortality by 30% (p=0.0003,
182 deaths in the ZOCOR group vs 256 deaths in the placebo group). The risk
of CHD mortality was significantly reduced by 42% (p=0.00001, 111 vs 189 deaths).
There was no statistically significant difference between groups in non-cardiovascular
mortality. ZOCOR significantly decreased the risk of having major coronary events
(CHD mortality plus hospital-verified and silent nonfatal myocardial infarction
[MI]) by 34% (p < 0.00001, 431 vs 622 patients with one or more events). The
risk of having a hospital-verified non-fatal MI was reduced by 37%. ZOCOR significantly
reduced the risk for undergoing myocardial revascularization procedures (coronary
artery bypass grafting or percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty) by
37% (p < 0.00001, 252 vs 383 patients). ZOCOR significantly reduced the risk
of fatal plus non-fatal cerebrovascular events (combined stroke and transient
ischemic attacks) by 28% (p=0.033, 75 vs 102 patients). ZOCOR reduced the risk
of major coronary events to a similar extent across the range of baseline total
and LDL cholesterol levels. Because there were only 53 female deaths, the effect
of ZOCOR on mortality in women could not be adequately assessed. However, ZOCOR
significantly lessened the risk of having major coronary events by 34% (60 vs
91 women with one or more event). The randomization was stratified by angina
alone (21% of each treatment group) or a previous MI. Because there were only
57 deaths among the patients with angina alone at baseline, the effect of ZOCOR
on mortality in this subgroup could not be adequately assessed. However, trends
in reduced coronary mortality, major coronary events and revascularization procedures
were consistent between this group and the total study cohort. Additionally,
ZOCOR resulted in similar decreases in relative risk for total mortality, CHD
mortality, and major coronary events in elderly patients ( 65 years), compared
with younger patients.
The Heart Protection Study (HPS) was a large, multi-center, placebo-controlled,
double-blind study with a mean duration of 5 years conducted in 20,536 patients
(10,269 on ZOCOR 40 mg and 10,267 on placebo). Patients were allocated to treatment
using a covariate adaptive method4 which took into account the distribution
of 10 important baseline characteristics of patients already enrolled and minimized
the imbalance of those characteristics across the groups. Patients had a mean
age of 64 years (range 40-80 years), were 97% Caucasian and were at high risk
of developing a major coronary event because of existing CHD (65%), diabetes
(Type 2, 26%; Type 1, 3%), history of stroke or other cerebrovascular disease
(16%), peripheral vessel disease (33%), or hypertension in males 65 years (6%).
At baseline, 3,421 patients (17%) had LDL-C levels below 100 mg/dL, of whom
953 (5%) had LDLC levels below 80 mg/dL; 7,068 patients (34%) had levels between
100 and 130 mg/dL; and 10,047 patients (49%) had levels greater than 130 mg/dL.
The HPS results showed that ZOCOR 40 mg/day significantly reduced: total and
CHD mortality; nonfatal MI, stroke, and revascularization procedures (coronary
and non-coronary) (see Table 4).
TABLE 4: Summary of Heart Protection Study Results
| Endpoint |
ZOCOR
(N=10,269)
n (%)† |
Placebo
(N=10,267)
n (%)† |
Risk Reduction
(%) (95% CI) |
p-Value |
| Primary |
| Mortality |
1,328 (12.9) |
1,507 (14.7) |
13 (6-19) |
p=0.0003 |
| CHD mortality |
587 (5.7) |
707 (6.9) |
18 (8-26) |
p=0.0005 |
| Secondary |
| Non-fatal MI |
357 (3.5) |
574 (5.6) |
38 (30-46) |
p < 0.0001 |
| Stroke |
444 (4.3) |
585 (5.7) |
25 (15-34) |
p < 0.0001 |
| Tertiary |
| Coronary revascularization |
513 (5) |
725 (7.1) |
30 (22-38) |
p < 0.0001 |
| Peripheral and other non-coronary revascularization |
450 (4.4) |
532 (5.2) |
16 (5-26) |
p=0.006 |
| † n = number of patients
with indicated event |
Two composite endpoints were defined in order to have sufficient events to
assess relative risk reductions across a range of baseline characteristics (see
Figure 1). A composite of major coronary events (MCE) was comprised of CHD mortality
and non-fatal MI (analyzed by time-to-first event; 898 patients treated with
ZOCOR had events and 1,212 patients on placebo had events). A composite of major
vascular events (MVE) was comprised of MCE, stroke and revascularization procedures
including coronary, peripheral and other non-coronary procedures (analyzed by
time-to-first event; 2,033 patients treated with ZOCOR had events and 2,585
patients on placebo had events). Significant relative risk reductions were observed
for both composite endpoints (27% for MCE and 24% for MVE, p < 0.0001). Treatment
with ZOCOR produced significant relative risk reductions for all components
of the composite endpoints. The risk reductions produced by ZOCOR in both MCE
and MVE were evident and consistent regardless of cardiovascular disease related
medical history at study entry (i.e., CHD alone; or peripheral vascular disease,
cerebrovascular disease, diabetes or treated hypertension, with or without CHD),
gender, age, creatinine levels up to the entry limit of 2.3 mg/dL, baseline
levels of LDL-C, HDL-C, apolipoprotein B and A-1, baseline concomitant cardiovascular
medications (i.e., aspirin, beta blockers, or calcium channel blockers), smoking
status, alcohol intake, or obesity. Diabetics showed risk reductions for MCE
and MVE due to ZOCOR treatment regardless of baseline HbA1c levels or obesity
with the greatest effects seen for diabetics without CHD.
Figure 1: The Effects of Treatment with ZOCOR on Major Vascular
Events and Major Coronary Events in HPS
N = number of patients in each subgroup. The inverted triangles are point estimates
of the relative risk, with their 95% confidence intervals represented as a line.
The area of a triangle is proportional to the number of patients with MVE or
MCE in the subgroup relative to the number with MVE or MCE, respectively, in
the entire study population. The vertical solid line represents a relative risk
of one. The vertical dashed line represents the point estimate of relative risk
in the entire study population.
Angiographic Studies
In the Multicenter Anti-Atheroma Study, the effect of simvastatin on atherosclerosis
was assessed by quantitative coronary angiography in hypercholesterolemic patients
with CHD. In this randomized, double-blind, controlled study, patients were
treated with simvastatin 20 mg/day or placebo. Angiograms were evaluated at
baseline, two and four years. The co-primary study endpoints were mean change
per-patient in minimum and mean lumen diameters, indicating focal and diffuse
disease, respectively. ZOCOR significantly slowed the progression of lesions
as measured in the Year 4 angiogram by both parameters, as well as by change
in percent diameter stenosis. In addition, simvastatin significantly decreased
the proportion of patients with new lesions and with new total occlusions.
Modifications of Lipid Profiles
Primary Hyperlipidemia (Fredrickson type lla and llb)
ZOCOR has been shown to be effective in reducing total-C and LDL-C in heterozygous
familial and non-familial forms of hyperlipidemia and in mixed hyperlipidemia.
Maximal to near maximal response is generally achieved within 4-6 weeks and
maintained during chronic therapy. ZOCOR consistently and significantly decreased
total-C, LDL-C, total-C/HDL-C ratio, and LDL-C/HDL-C ratio; ZOCOR also decreased
TG and increased HDL-C (see Table 5).
TABLE 5: Mean Response in Patients with Primary Hyperlipidemia
and Combined (mixed) Hyperlipidemia (Mean Percent Change from Baseline After
6 to 24 Weeks)
| TREATMENT |
N |
TOTAL-C |
LDL-C |
HDL-C |
TG† |
| Lower Dose Comparative Study ‡ (Mean % Change
at Week 6) |
| ZOCOR 5 mg q.p.m. |
109 |
-19 |
-26 |
10 |
-12 |
| ZOCOR 10 mg q.p.m. |
110 |
-23 |
-30 |
12 |
-15 |
| Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study§ (Mean %
Change at Week 6) |
| Placebo |
2223 |
-1 |
-1 |
0 |
-2 |
| ZOCOR 20 mg q.p.m. |
2221 |
-28 |
-38 |
8 |
-19 |
| Upper Dose Comparative Study || (Mean % Change Averaged
at Weeks 18 and 24) |
| ZOCOR 40 mg q.p.m. |
433 |
-31 |
-41 |
9 |
-18 |
| ZOCOR 80 mg q.p.m. ¶ |
664 |
-36 |
-47 |
8 |
-24 |
| Multi-Center Combined Hyperlipidemia Study ††
(Mean % Change at Week 6) |
| Placebo |
125 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
-4 |
| ZOCOR 40 mg q.p.m. |
123 |
-25 |
-29 |
13 |
-28 |
| ZOCOR 80 mg q.p.m. |
124 |
-31 |
-36 |
16 |
-33 |
† median percent change
‡mean baseline LDL-C 244 mg/dL and median baseline TG 168 mg/dL
§ mean baseline LDL-C 188 mg/dL and median baseline TG 128
mg/dL
||mean baseline LDL-C 226 mg/dL and median baseline TG 156 mg/Dl
¶ 21% and 36% median reduction in TG in patients with
TG ≤ 200 mg/dL and TG > 200 mg/dL, respectively. Patients with TG
> 350 mg/dL were excluded
†† mean baseline LDL-C 156 mg/dL and median baseline
TG 391 mg/dL. |
Hypertriglyceridemia (Fredrickson type lV)
The results of a subgroup analysis in 74 patients with type lV hyperlipidemia
from a 130-patient, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 3-period crossover study
are presented in Table 6.
TABLE 6: Six-week, Lipid-lowering Effects of Simvastatin
in Type lV Hyperlipidemia Median Percent Change (25th and 75th
percentile) from Baseline†
| TREATMENT |
N |
Total-C |
LDL-C |
HDL-C |
TG |
VLDL-C |
Non-HDL-C |
| Placebo |
74 |
+2 |
+1 |
+3 |
-9 |
-7 |
+1 |
| (-7, +7) |
(-8, +14) |
(-3, +10) |
(-25, +13) |
(-25, +11) |
(-9, +8) |
| ZOCOR 40 mg/day |
74 |
-25 |
-28 |
+11 |
-29 |
-37 |
-32 |
| (-34, -19) |
(-40, -17) |
(+5, +23) |
(-43, -16) |
(-54, -23) |
(-42, -23) |
| ZOCOR 80 mg/day |
74 |
-32 |
-37 |
+15 |
-34 |
-41 |
-38 |
| (-38, -24) |
(-46, -26) |
(+5, +23) |
(-45, -18) |
(-57, -28) |
(-49, -32) |
| † The median baseline
values (mg/dL) for the patients in this study were: total-C = 254, LDL-C
= 135, HDL-C = 36, TG = 404, VLDL-C = 83, and non-HDL-C = 215. |
Dysbetalipoproteinemia (Fredrickson type lll)
The results of a subgroup analysis in 7 patients with type lll hyperlipidemia
(dysbetalipoproteinemia) (apo E2/2) (VLDL-C/TG > 0.25) from a 130-patient,
double-blind, placebo-controlled, 3-period crossover study are presented in
Table 7.
TABLE 7: Six-week, Lipid-lowering Effects of Simvastatin
in Type lll Hyperlipidemia Median Percent Change (min, max) from Baseline†
| TREATMENT |
N |
Total-C |
LDL-C + IDL |
HDL-C |
TG |
VLDL-C + IDL |
Non-HDL-C |
| Placebo |
7 |
-8 |
-8 |
-2 |
+4 |
-4 |
-8 |
| (-24, +34) |
(-27, +23) |
(-21, +16) |
(-22, +90) |
(-28, +78) |
(-26, -39) |
| ZOCOR 40 mg/day |
7 |
-50 |
-50 |
+7 |
-41 |
-58 |
-57 |
| (-66, -39) |
(-60, -31) |
(-8, +23) |
(-74, -16) |
(-90, -37) |
(-72, -44) |
| ZOCOR 80 mg/day |
7 |
-52 |
-51 |
+7 |
-38 |
-60 |
-59 |
| (-55, -41) |
(-57, -28) |
(-5, +29) |
(-58, +2) |
(-72, -39) |
(-61, -46) |
| † The median baseline
values (mg/dL) were: total-C = 324, LDL-C = 121, HDL-C = 31, TG = 411,
VLDL-C = 170, and non-HDL-C = 291. |
Homozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia
In a controlled clinical study, 12 patients 15-39 years of age with homozygous
familial hypercholesterolemia received simvastatin 40 mg/day in a single dose
or in 3 divided doses, or 80 mg/day in 3 divided doses. In 11 patients with
reductions in LDL-C, the mean LDL-C changes for the 40- and 80-mg doses were
14% (range 8% to 23%, median 12%) and 30% (range 14% to 46%, median 29%), respectively.
One patient had an increase of 15% in LDL-C. Another patient with absent LDL-C
receptor function had an LDL-C reduction of 41% with the 80-mg dose.
Endocrine Function
In clinical studies, simvastatin did not impair adrenal reserve or significantly
reduce basal plasma cortisol concentration. Small reductions from baseline in
basal plasma testosterone in men were observed in clinical studies with simvastatin,
an effect also observed with other statins and the bile acid sequestrant cholestyramine.
There was no effect on plasma gonadotropin levels. In a placebo-controlled,
12-week study there was no significant effect of simvastatin 80 mg on the plasma
testosterone response to human chorionic gonadotropin. In another 24-week study,
simvastatin 20-40 mg had no detectable effect on spermatogenesis. In 4S, in
which 4,444 patients were randomized to simvastatin 20-40 mg/day or placebo
for a median duration of 5.4 years, the incidence of male sexual adverse events
in the two treatment groups was not significantly different. Because of these
factors, the small changes in plasma testosterone are unlikely to be clinically
significant. The effects, if any, on the pituitary-gonadal axis in premenopausal
women are unknown.
Clinical Studies in Adolescents
In a double-blind, placebo-controlled study, 175 patients (99 adolescent boys
and 76 post-menarchal girls) 10-17 years of age (mean age 14.1 years) with heterozygous
familial hypercholesterolemia (HeFH) were randomized to simvastatin (n=106)
or placebo (n=67) for 24 weeks (base study). Inclusion in the study required
a baseline LDL-C level between 160 and 400 mg/dL and at least one parent with
an LDLC level > 189 mg/dL. The dosage of simvastatin (once daily in the evening)
was 10 mg for the first 8 weeks, 20 mg for the second 8 weeks, and 40 mg thereafter.
In a 24-week extension, 144 patients elected to continue therapy with simvastatin
40 mg or placebo.
ZOCOR significantly decreased plasma levels of total-C, LDL-C, and Apo B (see
Table 8). Results from the extension at 48 weeks were comparable to those observed
in the base study.
TABLE 8: Lipid-Lowering Effects of Simvastatin in Adolescent
Patients with Heterozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia (Mean Percent Change
from Baseline)
| Dosage |
Duration |
N |
|
Total-C |
LDL-C |
HDL-C |
TG† |
Apo B |
| Placebo |
24 Weeks |
67 |
% Change from Baseline
(95% CI) |
1.6
(-2.2, 5.3) |
1.1
(-3.4, 5.5) |
3.6
(-0.7, 8.0) |
-3.2
(-11.8, 5.4) |
-0.5
(-4.7, 3.6) |
| Mean baseline, mg/dL (SD) |
278.6
(51.8) |
211.9
(49.0) |
46.9
(11.9) |
90.0
(50.7) |
186.3
(38.1) |
| ZOCOR |
24 Weeks |
106 |
% Change from Baseline (95% CI) |
-26.5
(-29.6, -23.3) |
-36.8
(-40.5, -33.0) |
8.3
(4.6, 11.9) |
-7.9
(-15.8, 0.0) |
-32.4
(-35.9, -29.0) |
| Mean baseline, mg/dL (SD) |
270.2
(44.0) |
203.8
(41.5) |
47.7
(9.0) |
78.3
(46.0) |
179.9
(33.8) |
| †median percent change |
After 24 weeks of treatment, the mean achieved LDL-C value was 124.9 mg/dL
(range: 64.0289.0 mg/dL) in the ZOCOR 40 mg group compared to 207.8 mg/dL (range:
128.0-334.0 mg/dL) in the placebo group. The safety and efficacy of doses above
40 mg daily have not been studied in children with HeFH. The long-term efficacy
of simvastatin therapy in childhood to reduce morbidity and mortality in adulthood
has not been established.
REFERENCES
4 D.R. Taves, Minimization: a new method of assigning patients to
treatment and control groups. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 15 (1974), pp. 443-453
Last updated on RxList: 7/10/2008