Pharmacokinetics
The mean pharmacokinetic parameters of linezolid in adults after single and
multiple oral and intravenous (IV) doses are summarized in Table 1. Plasma concentrations
of linezolid at steady-state after oral doses of 600 mg given every 12 hours
(q12h) are shown in Figure 1.
Table 1. Mean (Standard Deviation) Pharmacokinetic Parameters
of Linezolid in Adults
| Dose of Linezolid |
Cmax μg/mL |
Cmin μm g/mL |
Tmax hrs |
AUC *& mu;g•h/mL |
t½ hrs |
CL mL/min |
| 400 mg tablet |
| single dose † |
8.10 (1.83) |
|
1.52 (1.01) |
55.10 (25.00) |
5.20 (1.50) |
146 (67) |
| every 12 hours |
11.00 (4.37) |
3.08 (2.25) |
1.12 (0.47) |
73.40 (33.50) |
4.69 (1.70) |
110 (49) |
| 600 mg tablet |
| single dose |
12.70 (3.96) |
|
1.28 (0.66) |
91.40 (39.30) |
4.26 (1.65) |
127 (48) |
| every 12 hours |
21.20 (5.78) |
6.15 (2.94) |
1.03 (0.62) |
138.00 (42.10) |
5.40 (2.06) |
80 (29) |
| 600 mg IV injection ‡ |
| single dose |
12.90 (1.60) |
|
0.50 (0.10) |
80.20 (33.30) |
4.40 (2.40) |
138 (39) |
| every 12 hours |
15.10 (2.52) |
3.68 (2.36) |
0.51 (0.03) |
89.70 (31.00) |
4.80 (1.70) |
123 (40) |
| 600 mg oral suspension |
| single dose |
11.00 (2.76) |
|
0.97 (0.88) |
80.80 (35.10) |
4.60 (1.71) |
141 (45) |
*AUC for single dose = AUC 0-∞;
for multiple-dose = AUC0-τ
† Data dose-normalized from 375 mg
‡Data dose-normalized from 625 mg, IV dose was given as 0.5-hour
infusion.
Cmax = Maximum plasma concentration; Cmin = Minimum plasma concentration;
Tmax = Time to Cmax; AUC = Area under concentration-time curve; t½ =
Elimination half-life; CL = Systemic clearance |
Figure 1. Plasma Concentrations of Linezolid in Adults at
Steady-State Following Oral Dosing Every 12 Hours (Mean ± Standard Deviation,
n=16)
Absorption: Linezolid is rapidly and extensively absorbed after
oral dosing. Maximum plasma concentrations are reached approximately 1 to 2
hours after dosing, and the absolute bioavailability is approximately 100%.
Therefore, linezolid may be given orally or intravenously without dose adjustment.
Linezolid may be administered without regard to the timing of meals. The time
to reach the maximum concentration is delayed from 1.5 hours to 2.2 hours and
Cmax is decreased by about 17% when high fat food is given with linezolid. However,
the total exposure measured as AUC0-∞ values is similar under
both conditions.
Distribution: Animal and human pharmacokinetic studies have demonstrated
that linezolid readily distributes to well-perfused tissues. The plasma protein
binding of linezolid is approximately 31% and is concentration-independent.
The volume of distribution of linezolid at steady-state averaged 40 to 50 liters
in healthy adult volunteers.
Linezolid concentrations have been determined in various fluids from a limited
number of subjects in Phase 1 volunteer studies following multiple dosing of
linezolid. The ratio of linezolid in saliva relative to plasma was 1.2 to 1
and for sweat relative to plasma was 0.55 to 1.
Metabolism: Linezolid is primarily metabolized by oxidation of
the morpholine ring, which results in two inactive ring-opened carboxylic acid
metabolites: the aminoethoxyacetic acid metabolite (A), and the hydroxyethyl
glycine metabolite (B). Formation of metabolite B is mediated by a non-enzymatic
chemical oxidation mechanism in vitro. Linezolid is not an inducer of cytochrome
P450 (CYP) in rats, and it has been demonstrated from in vitro studies that
linezolid is not detectably metabolized by human cytochrome P450 and it does
not inhibit the activities of clinically significant human CYP isoforms (1A2,
2C9, 2C19, 2D6, 2E1, 3A4).
Excretion: Nonrenal clearance accounts for approximately 65%
of the total clearance of linezolid. Under steady-state conditions, approximately
30% of the dose appears in the urine as linezolid, 40% as metabolite B, and
10% as metabolite A. The renal clearance of linezolid is low (average 40 mL/min)
and suggests net tubular reabsorption. Virtually no linezolid appears in the
feces, while approximately 6% of the dose appears in the feces as metabolite
B, and 3% as metabolite A.
A small degree of nonlinearity in clearance was observed with increasing doses
of linezolid, which appears to be due to lower renal and nonrenal clearance
of linezolid at higher concentrations. However, the difference in clearance
was small and was not reflected in the apparent elimination half-life.
Special Populations
Geriatric: The pharmacokinetics of linezolid are not significantly
altered in elderly patients (65 years or older). Therefore, dose adjustment
for geriatric patients is not necessary.
Pediatric: The pharmacokinetics of linezolid following a single
IV dose were investigated in pediatric patients ranging in age from birth through
17 years (including premature and full-term neonates), in healthy adolescent
subjects ranging in age from 12 through 17 years, and in pediatric patients
ranging in age from 1 week through 12 years. The pharmacokinetic parameters
of linezolid are summarized in Table 2 for the pediatric populations studied
and healthy adult subjects after administration of single IV doses.
The Cmax and the volume of distribution (Vss) of linezolid are similar regardless
of age in pediatric patients. However, clearance of linezolid varies as a function
of age. With the exclusion of pre-term neonates less than one week of age, clearance
is most rapid in the youngest age groups ranging from > 1 week old to 11 years,
resulting in lower single-dose systemic exposure (AUC) and shorter half-life
as compared with adults. As age of pediatric patients increases, the clearance
of linezolid gradually decreases, and by adolescence mean clearance values approach
those observed for the adult population. There is wider inter-subject variability
in linezolid clearance and systemic drug exposure (AUC) across all pediatric
age groups as compared with adults.
Similar mean daily AUC values were observed in pediatric patients from birth
to 11 years of age dosed every 8 hours (q8h) relative to adolescents or adults
dosed every 12 hours (q12h). Therefore, the dosage for pediatric patients up
to 11 years of age should be 10 mg/kg q8h. Pediatric patients 12 years and older
should receive 600 mg q12h (see DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION).
Table 2. Pharmacokinetic Parameters of Linezolid in Pediatrics
and Adults Following a Single Intravenous Infusion of 10 mg/kg or 600 mg Linezolid
(Mean: (%CV); [Min, Max Values])
| Age Group |
Cmax μm g/mL |
Vss L/kg |
AUC* μg•h/mL |
t½ hrs |
CL mL/min/kg |
| Neonatal Patients |
| Pre-term** < 1 week (N=9)† |
12.7 (30%) |
0.81 (24%) |
108 (47%) |
5.6 (46%) |
2.0 (52%) |
| [9.6, 22.2] |
[0.43, 1.05] |
[41, 191] |
[2.4, 9.8] |
[0.9, 4.0] |
| Full-term*** < 1 week (N=10)† |
11.5 (24%) |
0.78 (20%) |
55 (47%) |
3.0 (55%) |
3.8 (55%) |
| [8.0, 18.3] |
[0.45, 0.96] |
[19, 103] |
[1.3, 6.1] |
[1.5, 8.8] |
| Full-term*** ≥ 1 week to ≤ 28 days (N=10)† |
12.9 (28%) |
0.66 (29%) |
34 (21%) |
1.5 (17%) |
5.1 (22%) |
| [7.7, 21.6] |
[0.35, 1.06] |
[23, 50] |
[1.2, 1.9] |
[3.3, 7.2] |
| Infant Patients |
| > 28 days to < 3Months (N=12 )† |
11.0 (27%) |
0.79 (26%) |
33 (26%) |
1.8 (28%) |
5.4 (32%) |
| [7.2, 18.0] |
[0.42, 1.08] |
[17, 48] |
[1.2, 2.8] |
[3.5, 9.9] |
| Pediatric Patients |
| 3 months through 11years† (N=59) |
15.1 (30%) |
0.69 (28%) |
58 (54%) |
2.9 (53%) |
3.8 (53%) |
| [6.8, 36.7] |
[0.31, 1.50] |
[19, 153] |
[0.9, 8.0] |
[1.0, 8.5] |
| Adolescent Subjects and Patients |
| 12 through 17 years ‡ (N=36) |
16.7 (24%) |
0.61 (15%) |
95 (44%) |
4.1 (46%) |
2.1 (53%) |
| [9.9, 28.9] |
[0.44, 0.79] |
[32, 178] |
[1.3, 8.1] |
[0.9, 5.2] |
| Adult Subjects§ (N= 29) |
12.5 (21%) |
0.65 (16%) |
91 (33%) |
4.9 (35%) |
1.7 (34%) |
| [8.2, 19.3] |
[0.45, 0.84] |
[53, 155] |
[1.8, 8.3] |
[0.9, 3.3] |
* AUC = Single dose AUC0-∞
**In this data set, “pre-term” is defined as < 34 weeks gestational
age (Note: Only 1 patient enrolled was pre-term with a postnatal age between
1 week and 28 days)
*** In this data set, “full-term” is defined as ≥ 34 weeks
gestational age
† Dose of 10 mg/kg
‡ Dose of 600 mg or 10 mg/kg up to a maximum of 600 mg
§ Dose normalized to 600 mg
Cmax = Maximum plasma concentration; V ss= Volume of distribution; AUC
= Area under concentration-time curve; t½ = Apparent elimination half-life;
CL = Systemic clearance normalized for body weight |
Gender: Females have a slightly lower volume of distribution
of linezolid than males. Plasma concentrations are higher in females than in
males, which is partly due to body weight differences. After a 600-mg dose,
mean oral clearance is approximately 38% lower in females than in males. However,
there are no significant gender differences in mean apparent elimination-rate
constant or half-life. Thus, drug exposure in females is not expected to substantially
increase beyond levels known to be well tolerated. Therefore, dose adjustment
by gender does not appear to be necessary.
Renal Insufficiency: The pharmacokinetics of the parent drug,
linezolid, are not altered in patients with any degree of renal insufficiency;
however, the two primary metabolites of linezolid may accumulate in patients
with renal insufficiency, with the amount of accumulation increasing with the
severity of renal dysfunction (see Table 3). The clinical significance of accumulation
of these two metabolites has not been determined in patients with severe renal
insufficiency. Because similar plasma concentrations of linezolid are achieved
regardless of renal function, no dose adjustment is recommended for patients
with renal insufficiency. However, given the absence of information on the clinical
significance of accumulation of the primary metabolites, use of linezolid in
patients with renal insufficiency should be weighed against the potential risks
of accumulation of these metabolites. Both linezolid and the two metabolites
are eliminated by dialysis. No information is available on the effect of peritoneal
dialysis on the pharmacokinetics of linezolid. Approximately 30% of a dose was
eliminated in a 3-hour dialysis session beginning 3 hours after the dose of
linezolid was administered; therefore, linezolid should be given after hemodialysis.
Table 3. Mean (Standard Deviation) AUCs and Elimination Half-lives
of Linezolid and Metabolites A and B in Patients with Varying Degrees of Renal
Insufficiency After a Single 600-mg Oral Dose of Linezolid
| Parameter |
Healthy
Subjects
CLCR
> 80mL/min |
Moderate Renal
Impairment
30 < CLCR
< 80 mL/min |
Severe Renal
Impairment10
< CLCR < 30
mL/min |
Hemodialysis-Dependent |
| Off Dialysis* |
On Dialysis |
| |
LINEZOLID |
| AUC0-∞ , μ g h/mL |
110 (22) |
128 (53) |
127 (66) |
141 (45) |
83 (23) |
| t½, hours |
6.4 (2.2) |
6.1 (1.7) |
7.1 (3.7) |
8.4 (2.7) |
7.0 (1.8) |
| |
Metabolite A |
| AUC0-48, μ g h/mL |
7.6 (1.9) |
11.7 (4.3) |
56.5 (30.6) |
185 (124) |
68.8 (23.9) |
| t½, hours |
6.3 (2.1) |
6.6 (2.3) |
9.0 (4.6) |
NA |
NA |
| |
METABOLITE B |
| AUC0-48 , μ g h/mL |
30.5 (6.2) |
51.1 (38.5) |
203 (92) |
467 (102) |
239 (44) |
| t½, hours |
6.6 (2.7) |
9.9 (7.4) |
11.0 (3.9) |
NA |
NA |
* between hemodialysis sessions
NA = Not applicable |
Hepatic Insufficiency: The pharmacokinetics of linezolid are
not altered in patients (n=7) with mild-to-moderate hepatic insufficiency (Child-Pugh
class A or B). On the basis of the available information, no dose adjustment
is recommended for patients with mild-to-moderate hepatic insufficiency. The
pharmacokinetics of linezolid in patients with severe hepatic insufficiency
have not been evaluated.
Drug-Drug Interactions
Drugs Metabolized by Cytochrome P450: Linezolid is not an inducer
of cytochrome P450 (CYP) in rats. It is not detectably metabolized by human
cytochrome P450 and it does not inhibit the activities of clinically significant
human CYP isoforms (1A2, 2C9, 2C19, 2D6, 2E1, 3A4). Therefore, no CYP450-induced
drug interactions are expected with linezolid. Concurrent administration of
linezolid does not substantially alter the pharmacokinetic characteristics of
(S)warfarin, which is extensively metabolized by CYP2C9. Drugs such as warfarin
and phenytoin, which are CYP2C9 substrates, may be given with linezolid without
changes in dosage regimen.
Antibiotics
Aztreonam: The pharmacokinetics of linezolid or aztreonam are not altered
when administered together.
Gentamicin: The pharmacokinetics of linezolid or gentamicin are not
altered when administered together.
Monoamine Oxidase Inhibition: Linezolid is a reversible, nonselective
inhibitor of monoamine oxidase. Therefore, linezolid has the potential for interaction
with adrenergic and serotonergic agents.
Adrenergic Agents: A significant pressor response has been observed
in normal adult subjects receiving linezolid and tyramine doses of more than
100 mg. Therefore, patients receiving linezolid need to avoid consuming large
amounts of foods or beverages with high tyramine content (see PRECAUTIONS,
INFORMATION FOR PATIENTS).
A reversible enhancement of the pressor response of either pseudoephedrine
HCl (PSE) or phenylpropanolamine HCl (PPA) is observed when linezolid is administered
to healthy normotensive subjects (see PRECAUTIONS: DRUG
INTERACTIONS). A similar study has not been conducted in hypertensive
patients. The interaction studies conducted in normotensive subjects evaluated
the blood pressure and heart rate effects of placebo, PPA or PSE alone, linezolid
alone, and the combination of steady-state linezolid (600 mg q12h for 3 days)
with two doses of PPA (25 mg) or PSE (60 mg) given 4 hours apart. Heart rate
was not affected by any of the treatments. Blood pressure was increased with
both combination treatments. Maximum blood pressure levels were seen 2 to 3
hours after the second dose of PPA or PSE, and returned to baseline 2 to 3 hours
after peak. The results of the PPA study follow, showing the mean (and range)
maximum systolic blood pressure in mm Hg: placebo = 121 (103 to 158); linezolid
alone = 120 (107 to 135); PPA alone = 125 (106 to 139); PPA with linezolid =
147 (129 to 176). The results from the PSE study were similar to those in the
PPA study. The mean maximum increase in systolic blood pressure over baseline
was 32 mm Hg (range: 20-52 mm Hg) and 38 mm Hg (range: 18-79 mm Hg) during co-administration
of linezolid with pseudoephedrine or phenylpropanolamine, respectively.
Serotonergic Agents: The potential drug-drug interaction with dextromethorphan
was studied in healthy volunteers. Subjects were administered dextromethorphan
(two 20-mg doses given 4 hours apart) with or without linezolid. No serotonin
syndrome effects (confusion, delirium, restlessness, tremors, blushing, diaphoresis,
hyperpyrexia) have been observed in normal subjects receiving linezolid and
dextromethorphan.
Microbiology
Linezolid is a synthetic antibacterial agent of a new class of antibiotics,
the oxazolidinones, which has clinical utility in the treatment of infections
caused by aerobic Gram-positive bacteria. The in vitro spectrum of activity
of linezolid also includes certain Gram-negative bacteria and anaerobic bacteria.
Linezolid inhibits bacterial protein synthesis through a mechanism of action
different from that of other antibacterial agents; therefore, cross-resistance
between linezolid and other classes of antibiotics is unlikely. Linezolid binds
to a site on the bacterial 23S ribosomal RNA of the 50S subunit and prevents
the formation of a functional 70S initiation complex, which is an essential component of the bacterial translation process. The results of time-kill studies
have shown linezolid to be bacteriostatic against enterococci and staphylococci.
For streptococci, linezolid was found to be bactericidal for the majority of
strains.
In clinical trials, resistance to linezolid developed in 6 patients infected
with Enterococcus faecium (4 patients received 200 mg q12h, lower than
the recommended dose, and 2 patients received 600 mg q12h). In a compassionate
use program, resistance to linezolid developed in 8 patients with E. faecium
and in 1 patient with Enterococcus faecalis. All patients had either
unremoved prosthetic devices or undrained abscesses. Resistance to linezolid
occurs in vitro at a frequency of 1 x 10 -9 to 1 x 10 -11.
In vitro studies have shown that point mutations in the 23S rRNA are associated
with linezolid resistance. Reports of vancomycin-resistant E. faecium
becoming resistant to linezolid during its clinical use have been published.1
In one report nosocomial spread of vancomycin- and linezolid-resistant
E. faecium occurred 2. There has been a report of Staphylococcus
aureus (methicillin-resistant) developing resistance to linezolid during
its clinical use.3 The linezolid resistance in these organisms was
associated with a point mutation in the 23S rRNA (substitution of thymine for
guanine at position 2576) of the organism. When antibiotic-resistant organisms
are encountered in the hospital, it is important to emphasize infection control
policies.4, 5 Resistance to linezolid has not been reported in Streptococcus
spp., including Streptococcus pneumoniae.
In vitro studies have demonstrated additivity or indifference between linezolid
and vancomycin, gentamicin, rifampin, imipenem-cilastatin, aztreonam, ampicillin,
or streptomycin.
Linezolid has been shown to be active against most isolates of the following
microorganisms, both in vitro and in clinical infections, as described in the
INDICATIONS AND USAGE section.
Aerobic and facultative Gram-positive microorganisms
Enterococcus faecium (vancomycin-resistant strains only)
Staphylococcus aureus (including methicillin-resistant strains)
Streptococcus agalactiae
Streptococcus pneumoniae (including multi-drug resistant isolates [MDRSP]
*
Streptococcus pyogenes
The following in vitro data are available, but their clinical significance
is unknown . At least 90% of the following microorganisms exhibit an in vitro
minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) less than or equal to the susceptible
breakpoint for linezolid. However, the safety and effectiveness of linezolid
in treating clinical infections due to these microorganisms have not been established
in adequate and well-controlled clinical trials.
Aerobic and facultative Gram-positive microorganisms
Enterococcus faecalis (including vancomycin-resistant strains)
Enterococcus faecium (vancomycin-susceptible strains)
Staphylococcus epidermidis (including methicillin-resistant strains)
Staphylococcus haemolyticus
Viridans group streptococci
Aerobic and facultative Gram-negative microorganisms
Pasteurella multocida
Susceptibility Testing Methods
NOTE: Susceptibility testing by dilution methods requires the use of
linezolid susceptibility powder.
When available, the results of in vitro susceptibility tests should be provided
to the physician as periodic reports which describe the susceptibility profile
of nosocomial and community-acquired pathogens. These reports should aid the
physician in selecting the most effective antimicrobial.
Dilution Techniques: Quantitative methods are used to determine
antimicrobial minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs). These MICs provide estimates
of the susceptibility of bacteria to antimicrobial compounds. The MICs should
be determined using a standardized procedure. Standardized procedures are based
on a dilution method 6,7 (broth or agar) or equivalent with standardized
inoculum concentrations and standardized concentrations of linezolid powder.
The MIC values should be interpreted according to criteria provided in Table
4.
Diffusion Techniques: Quantitative methods that require measurement
of zone diameters also provide reproducible estimates of the susceptibility
of bacteria to antimicrobial compounds. One such standardized procedure 7,8
requires the use of standardized inoculum concentrations. This procedure uses
paper disks impregnated with 30 μ g of linezolid to test the susceptibility
of microorganisms to linezolid. The disk diffusion interpretive criteria are
provided in Table 4.
Table 4. Susceptibility Interpretive Criteria for Linezolid
| Pathogen |
Susceptibility Interpretive Criteria |
Minimal Inhibitory
Concentrations
(MIC in μg/mL) |
Disk Diffusion
(ZoneDiameters inmm) |
| S |
I |
R |
S |
I |
R |
| Enterococcus spp |
≤ 2 |
4 |
≥ 8 |
≥ 23 |
21-22 |
≤ 20 |
| Staphylococcus spp a |
≤ 4 |
- |
- |
≥ 21 |
- |
- |
| Streptococcus pneumoniaea |
≤ 2b |
- |
- |
≥ 21c |
- |
- |
| Streptococcus spp other than S pneumoniae a |
≤ 2b |
- |
- |
≥ 21c |
- |
- |
a The current absence of data
on resistant strains precludes defining any categories other than “Susceptible.”
Strains yielding test results suggestive of a “nonsusceptible”
category should be retested, and if the result is confirmed, the isolate
should be submitted to a reference laboratory for further testing.
b and Streptococcus These interpretive standards for
S. pneumoniae spp. other than S. pneumoniae are applicable
only to tests performed by broth microdilution using cation-adjusted Mueller-Hinton
broth with 2 to 5% lysed horse blood inoculated with a direct colony suspension
and incubated in ambient air at 35 °C for 20 to 24 hours.
c These zone diameter interpretive standards are applicable
only to tests performed using Mueller-Hinton agar supplemented with 5%
defibrinated sheep blood inoculated with a direct colony suspension and
incubated in 5% CO2 at 35 °C for 20 to 24 hours. |
A report of “Susceptible” indicates that the pathogen is likely to
be inhibited if the antimicrobial compound in the blood reaches the concentrations
usually achievable. A report of “Intermediate” indicates that the
result should be considered equivocal, and, if the microorganism is not fully
susceptible to alternative, clinically feasible drugs, the test should be repeated.
This category implies possible clinical applicability in body sites where the
drug is physiologically concentrated or in situations where high dosage of drug
can be used. This category also provides a buffer zone which prevents small
uncontrolled technical factors from causing major discrepancies in interpretation.
A report of “Resistant” indicates that the pathogen is not likely
to be inhibited if the antimicrobial compound in the blood reaches the concentrations
usually achievable; other therapy should be selected.
Quality Control
Standardized susceptibility test procedures require the use of quality control
microorganisms to control the technical aspects of the test procedures. Standard
linezolid powder should provide the following range of values noted in Table
5. NOTE: Quality control microorganisms are specific strains of organisms
with intrinsic biological properties relating to resistance mechanisms and their
genetic expression within bacteria; the specific strains used for microbiological
quality control are not clinically significant.
Table 5. Acceptable Quality Control Ranges for Linezolid
to be Used in Validation of Susceptibility Test Results
| QC Strain |
Acceptable Quality Control Ranges |
Minimum Inhibitory
Concentration
(MIC in μg/mL) |
Disk Diffusion
(Zone Diameters in mm)
|
| Enterococcus faecalis ATCC 29212 |
1 - 4 |
Not applicable |
| Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 29213 |
1 - 4 |
Not applicable |
| Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 25923 |
Not applicable |
25 - 32 |
| Streptococcus pneumoniae ATCC 49619d |
0.50 - 2e |
25 - 34f |
d This organism may be used for
validation of susceptibility test results when testing Streptococcus
spp. other than S. pneumoniae.
e This quality control range for S. pneumoniae is applicable
only to tests performed by broth microdilution using cation-adjusted Mueller-Hinton
broth with 2 to 5% lysed horse blood inoculated with a direct colony suspension
and incubated in ambient air at 35 °C for 20 to 24 hours.
f This quality control zone diameter range is applicable only to
tests performed using Mueller-Hinton agar supplemented with 5% defibrinated
sheep blood inoculated with a direct colony suspension and incubated in
5% CO2 at 35°C for 20 to 24 hours. |
Animal Pharmacology
Target organs of linezolid toxicity were similar in juvenile and adult rats
and dogs. Dose- and time-dependent myelosuppression, as evidenced by bone marrow
hypocellularity/decreased hematopoiesis, decreased extramedullary hematopoiesis
in spleen and liver, and decreased levels of circulating erythrocytes, leukocytes,
and platelets have been seen in animal studies. Lymphoid depletion occurred
in thymus, lymph nodes, and spleen. Generally, the lymphoid findings were associated
with anorexia, weight loss, and suppression of body weight gain, which may have
contributed to the observed effects.
In rats administered linezolid orally for 6 months, non-reversible, minimal
to mild axonal degeneration of sciatic nerves was observed at 80 mg/kg/day;
minimal degeneration of the sciatic nerve was also observed in 1 male at this
dose level at a 3-month interim necropsy. Sensitive morphologic evaluation of
perfusion-fixed tissues was conducted to investigate evidence of optic nerve
degeneration. Minimal to moderate optic nerve degeneration was evident in 2
male rats after 6 months of dosing, but the direct relationship to drug was
equivocal because of the acute nature of the finding and its asymmetrical distribution.
The nerve degeneration observed was microscopically comparable to spontaneous
unilateral optic nerve degeneration reported in aging rats and may be an exacerbation
of common background change.
These effects were observed at exposure levels that are comparable to those
observed in some human subjects. The hematopoietic and lymphoid effects were
reversible, although in some studies, reversal was incomplete within the duration
of the recovery period.
Clinical Studies
Adults
Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococcal Infections
Adult patients with documented or suspected vancomycin-resistant enterococcal
infection were enrolled in a randomized, multi-center, double-blind trial comparing
a high dose of ZYVOX (600 mg) with a low dose of ZYVOX (200 mg) given every
12 hours (q12h) either intravenously (IV) or orally for 7 to 28 days. Patients
could receive concomitant aztreonam or aminoglycosides. There were 79 patients
randomized to high-dose linezolid and 66 to low-dose linezolid. The intent-to-treat
(ITT) population with documented vancomycin-resistant enterococcal infection
at baseline consisted of 65 patients in the high-dose arm and 52 in the low-dose
arm. The cure rates for the ITT population with documented vancomycin-resistant
enterococcal infection at baseline are presented in Table 15 by source of infection.
These cure rates do not include patients with missing or indeterminate outcomes.
The cure rate was higher in the highdose arm than in the low-dose arm, although
the difference was not statistically significant at the 0.05 level.
Table 15. Cure Rates at the Test-of-Cure Visit for ITT Adult
Patients with Documented Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococcal Infections at Baseline
| Source of Infection |
Cured |
ZYVOX
600 mg q12h
n/N (%) |
ZYVOX
200 mg q12h
n/N (%) |
| Any site |
39/58 (67) |
24/46 (52) |
| Any site with associated bacteremia |
10/17 (59) |
4/14 (29) |
| Bacteremia of unknown origin |
5/10 (50) |
2/7 (29) |
| Skin and skin structure |
9/13 (69) |
5/5 (100) |
| Urinary tract |
12/19 (63) |
12/20 (60) |
| Pneumonia |
2/3 (67) |
0/1 (0) |
| Other* |
11/13 (85) |
5/13 (39) |
| * Includes sources of infection such as
hepatic abscess, biliary sepsis, necrotic gall bladder, pericolonic abscess,
pancreatitis, and catheter-related infection. |
Nosocomial Pneumonia
Adult patients with clinically and radiologically documented nosocomial pneumonia
were enrolled in a randomized, multi-center, double-blind trial. Patients were
treated for 7 to 21 days. One group received ZYVOX I.V. Injection 600 mg q12h,
and the other group received vancomycin 1 g q12h IV. Both groups received concomitant
aztreonam (1 to 2 g every 8 hours IV), which could be continued if clinically
indicated. There were 203 linezolid-treated and 193 vancomycin-treated patients
enrolled in the study. One hundred twenty-two (60%) linezolidtreated patients
and 103 (53%) vancomycin-treated patients were clinically evaluable. The cure
rates in clinically evaluable patients were 57% for linezolid-treated patients
and 60% for vancomycin-treated patients. The cure rates in clinically evaluable
patients with ventilatorassociated pneumonia were 47% for linezolid-treated
patients and 40% for vancomycin-treated patients. A modified intent-to-treat
(MITT) analysis of 94 linezolid-treated patients and 83 vancomycin-treated patients
included subjects who had a pathogen isolated before treatment. The cure rates
in the MITT analysis were 57% in linezolid-treated patients and 46% in vancomycin-treated
patients. The cure rates by pathogen for microbiologically evaluable patients
are presented in Table 16.
Table 16. Cure Rates at the Test-of-Cure Visit for Microbiologically
Evaluable Adult Patients with Nosocomial Pneumonia
| Pathogen |
Cured |
ZYVOX
n/N (%) |
Vancomycin
n/N (%) |
| Staphylococcus aureus |
23/38 (61) |
14/23 (61) |
| Methicillin-resistant S. aureus |
13/22 (59) |
7/10 (70) |
| Streptococcus pneumoniae |
9/9 (100) |
9/10 (90) |
Pneumonia caused by multi-drug resistant S.pneumoniae (MDRSP*)
ZYVOX was studied for the treatment of community-acquired (CAP) and hospital-acquired
(HAP) pneumonia due to MDRSP by pooling clinical data from seven comparative
and noncomparative Phase 2 and Phase 3 studies involving adult and pediatric
patients. The pooled MITT population consisted of all patients with S.pneumoniae
isolated at baseline; the pooled ME population consisted of patients satisfying
criteria for microbiologic evaluability. The pooled MITT population with CAP
included 15 patients (41%) with severe illness (risk classes IV and V) as assessed
by a prediction rule11. The pooled clinical cure rates for patients
with CAP due to MDRSP were 35/48 (73%) in the MITT and 33/36 (92%) in the ME
populations respectively. The pooled clinical cure rates for patients with HAP
due to MDRSP were 12/18 (67%) in the MITT and 10/12 (83%) in the ME populations
respectively.
Table 17. Clinical cure rates for 36 microbiologically-evaluable
patients with CAP due to MDRSP* who were treated with ZYVOX (stratified by antibiotic
susceptibility)
| Susceptibility Screening |
Clinical |
Cure |
| n/Na |
(%) |
| Penicillin-resistant |
14/16 |
88 |
| 2nd generation cephalosporin-resistantb |
19/22 |
86 |
| Macrolide-resistantc |
29/30 |
97 |
| Tetracycline-resistant |
22/24 |
92 |
| Trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole-resistant |
18/21 |
86 |
a) n= pooled number of patients treated
successfully; N= pooled number of patients having MDRSP isolates that
exhibited resistance to the listed antibiotic
b) 2nd-generation cephalosporin tested was cefuroxime
c) macrolide tested was erythromycin |
Complicated Skin and Skin Structure Infections
Adult patients with clinically documented complicated skin and skin structure
infections were enrolled in a randomized, multi-center, double-blind, double-dummy
trial comparing study medications administered IV followed by medications given
orally for a total of 10 to 21 days of treatment. One group of patients received
ZYVOX I.V. Injection 600 mg q12h followed by ZYVOX Tablets 600 mg q12h; the
other group received oxacillin 2 g every 6 hours (q6h) IV followed by dicloxacillin
500 mg q6h orally. Patients could receive concomitant aztreonam if clinically
indicated. There were 400 linezolid-treated and 419 oxacillin-treated patients
enrolled in the study. Two hundred forty-five (61%) linezolid-treated patients
and 242 (58%) oxacillintreated patients were clinically evaluable. The cure
rates in clinically evaluable patients were 90% in linezolid-treated patients
and 85% in oxacillin-treated patients. A modified intent-to-treat (MITT) analysis
of 316 linezolid-treated patients and 313 oxacillin-treated patients included
subjects who met all criteria for study entry. The cure rates in the MITT analysis
were 86% in linezolid-treated patients and 82% in oxacillin-treated patients.
The cure rates by pathogen for microbiologically evaluable patients are presented
in Table 18.
Table 18. Cure Rates at the Test-of-Cure Visit for Microbiologically
Evaluable Adult Patients with Complicated Skin and Skin Structure Infections
| Pathogen
|
Cured
|
ZYVOX
n/N (%)
|
Oxacillin/
Dicloxacillin n/N (%)
|
| Staphylococcus aureus |
73/83 (88) |
72/84 (86) |
| Methicillin-resistant S. aureus |
2/3 (67) |
0/0 (-) |
* MDRSP refers to isolates resistant to two or more of the following antibiotics:
penicillin, second-generation cephalosporins, macrolides, tetracycline, and
trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole.
| Streptococcus agalactiae |
6/6 (100) |
3/6 (50) |
| Streptococcus pyogenes |
18/26 (69) |
21/28 (75) |
A separate study provided additional experience with the use of ZYVOX in the
treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections.
This was a randomized, openlabel trial in hospitalized adult patients with documented
or suspected MRSA infection.
One group of patients received ZYVOX I.V. Injection 600 mg q12h followed by
ZYVOX Tablets 600 mg q12h. The other group of patients received vancomycin 1
g q12h IV. Both groups were treated for 7 to 28 days, and could receive concomitant
aztreonam or gentamicin if clinically indicated. The cure rates in microbiologically
evaluable patients with MRSA skin and skin structure infection were 26/33 (79%)
for linezolid-treated patients and 24/33 (73%) for vancomycin-treated patients.
Diabetic Foot Infections
Adult diabetic patients with clinically documented complicated skin and skin
structure infections (“diabetic foot infections”) were enrolled in
a randomized (2:1 ratio), multi-center, open-label trial comparing study medications
administered IV or orally for a total of 14 to 28 days of treatment. One group
of patients received ZYVOX 600 mg q12h IV or orally; the other group received
ampicillin/sulbactam 1.5 to 3 g IV or amoxicillin/clavulanate 500 to 875 mg
every 8 to 12 hours (q8-12h) orally. In countries where ampicillin/sulbactam
is not marketed, amoxicillin/clavulanate 500 mg to 2 g every 6 hours (q6h) was
used for the intravenous regimen. Patients in the comparator group could also
be treated with vancomycin 1 g q12h IV if MRSA was isolated from the foot infection.
Patients in either treatment group who had Gram-negative bacilli isolated from
the infection site could also receive aztreonam 1 to 2 g q8-12h IV. All patients
were eligible to receive appropriate adjunctive treatment methods, such as debridement
and off-loading, as typically required in the treatment of diabetic foot infections,
and most patients received these treatments. There were 241 linezolid-treated
and 120 comparator-treated patients in the intent-to-treat (ITT) study population.
Two hundred twelve (86%) linezolidtreated patients and 105 (85%) comparator-treated
patients were clinically evaluable. In the ITT population, the cure rates were
68.5% (165/241) in linezolid-treated patients and 64% (77/120) in comparator-treated
patients, where those with indeterminate and missing outcomes were considered
failures. The cure rates in the clinically evaluable patients (excluding those
with indeterminate and missing outcomes) were 83% (159/192) and 73% (74/101)
in the linezolid-and comparator-treated patients, respectively. A critical post-hoc
analysis focused on 121 linezolid-treated and 60 comparator-treated patients
who had a Gram-positive pathogen isolated from the site of infection or from
blood, who had less evidence of underlying osteomyelitis than the overall study
population, and who did not receive prohibited antimicrobials. Based upon that
analysis, the cure rates were 71% (86/121) in the linezolid-treated patients
and 63% (38/60) in the comparator-treated patients. None of the above analyses
were adjusted for the use of adjunctive therapies. The cure rates by pathogen
for microbiologically evaluable patients are presented in Table 19.
Table 19. Cure Rates at the Test-of-Cure Visit for Microbiologically
Evaluable Adult Patients with Diabetic Foot Infections
| Pathogen |
Cured |
|
ZYVOX
n/N (%) |
Comparator
n/N (%) |
| Staphylococcus aureus |
49/63 (78) |
20/29 (69) |
| Methicillin-resistant S. aureus |
12/17 (71) |
2/3 (67) |
| Streptococcus agalactiae |
25/29 (86) |
9/16 (56) |
Pediatric Patients
Infections Due to Gram-positive Organisms
A safety and efficacy study provided experience on the use of ZYVOX in pediatric
patients for the treatment of nosocomial pneumonia, complicated skin and skin
structure infections, catheterrelated bacteremia, bacteremia of unidentified
source, and other infections due to Gram-positive bacterial pathogens, including
methicillin-resistant and -susceptible Staphylococcus aureus and vancomycin-resistant
Enterococcus faecium. Pediatric patients ranging in age from birth through
11 years with infections caused by the documented or suspected Gram-positive
organisms were enrolled in a randomized, open-label, comparator-controlled trial.
One group of patients received ZYVOX I.V. Injection 10 mg/kg every 8 hours (q8h)
followed by ZYVOX for Oral Suspension 10 mg/kg q8h. A second group received
vancomycin 10 to 15 mg/kg IV every 6 to 24 hours, depending on age and renal
clearance. Patients who had confirmed VRE infections were placed in a third
arm of the study and received ZYVOX 10 mg/kg q8h IV and/or orally. All patients
were treated for a total of 10 to 28 days and could receive concomitant Gramnegative
antibiotics if clinically indicated. In the intent-to-treat (ITT) population,
there were 206 patients randomized to linezolid and 102 patients randomized
to vancomycin. One hundred seventeen (57 %) linezolid-treated patients and 55
(54%) vancomycin-treated patients were clinically evaluable. The cure rates
in ITT patients were 81% in patients randomized to linezolid and 83% in patients
randomized to vancomycin (95% Confidence Interval of the treatment difference;
-13%, 8%). The cure rates in clinically evaluable patients were 91% in linezolidtreated
patients and 91% in vancomycin-treated patients (95% CI; -11%, 11%). Modified
intentto-treat (MITT) patients included ITT patients who, at baseline, had a
Gram-positive pathogen isolated from the site of infection or from blood. The
cure rates in MITT patients were 80% in patients randomized to linezolid and
90% in patients randomized to vancomycin (95% CI; -23%, 3%). The cure rates
for ITT, MITT, and clinically evaluable patients are presented in Table 20.
After the study was completed, 13 additional patients ranging from 4 days through
16 years of age were enrolled in an open-label extension of the VRE arm of the
study. Table 21 provides clinical cure rates by pathogen for microbiologically
evaluable patients including microbiologically evaluable patients with vancomycin-resistant
Enterococcus faecium from the extension of this study.
Table 20. Cure Rates at the Test-of-Cure Visit for Intent
to Treat, Modified Intent to Treat, and Clinically Evaluable Pediatric Patients
by Baseline Diagnosis
| Population |
ITT |
MITT* |
Clinically Evaluable |
ZYVOX
n/N (%) |
Vancomycin
n/N (%) |
ZYVOX
n/N (%) |
Vancomycin
n/N (%) |
ZYVOX
n/N (%) |
Vancomycin
n/N (%) |
| Any diagnosis |
150/186 (81) |
69/83 (83) |
86/108 (80) |
44/49 (90) |
106/117 (91) |
49/54 (91) |
| Bacteremia of unidentified source |
22/29 (76) |
11/16 (69) |
8/12 (67) |
7/8 (88) |
14/17 (82) |
7/9 (78) |
| Catheter-related bacteremia |
30/41 (73) |
8/12 (67) |
25/35 (71) |
7/10 (70) |
21/25(84) |
7/9 (78) |
| Complicated skin and skin structure infections |
61/72 (85) |
31/34 (91) |
37/43 (86) |
22/23 (96) |
46/49 (94) |
26/27 (96) |
| Nosocomial pneumonia |
13/18 (72) |
11/12 (92) |
5/6 (83) |
4/4 (100) |
7/7 (100) |
5/5 (100) |
| Other infections |
24/26 (92) |
8/9 (89) |
11/12 (92) |
4/4 (100) |
18/19 (95) |
4/4 (100) |
| * MITT = ITT patients with an isolated Gram-positive
pathogen at baseline |
Table 21. Cure Rates at the Test-of-Cure Visit for Microbiologically
Evaluable Pediatric Patients with Infections due to Gram-positive Pathogens
| Pathogen |
Microbiologically Evaluable |
ZYVOX
n/N (%) |
Vancomycin
n/N (%) |
| Vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium |
6/8 (75)* |
0/0 (-) |
| Staphylococcus aureus |
36/38 (95) |
23/24 (96) |
| Methicillin-resistant S. aureus |
16/17 (94) |
9/9 (100) |
| Streptococcus pyogenes |
2/2 (100) |
½ (50) |
| * Includes data from 7 patients enrolled
in the open-label extension of this study. |
REFERENCES
*MDRSP refers to isolates resistant to two or more of the following
antibiotics: penicillin, second-generation cephalosporins, macrolides, tetracycline,
and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole.
1. Gonzales RD, PC Schreckenberger, MB Graham, et al. Infections
due to vancomycinresistant Enterococcus faecium resistant to linezolid.
The Lancet 2001;357:1179.
2. Herrero IA, NC Issa, R Patel. Nosocomial spread of linezolid-resistant,
vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium. The New England Journal of
Medicine 2002;346:867-869.
3. Tsiodras S, HS Gold, G Sakoulas, et al. Linezolid resistance
in a clinical isolate of Staphylococcus aureus. The Lancet 2001;358:207-208.
4. Goldman DA, RA Weinstein, RP Wenzel, et al. Strategies to
prevent and control the emergence and spread of antimicrobial-resistant microorganisms
in hospitals. A challenge to hospital leadership. The Journal of the American
Medical Association 1996;275:234-240.
5. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Guideline for
hand hygiene in health-care settings: Recommendations of the Healthcare Infection
Control Practices Advisory Committee and the HIPAC/SHEA/APIC/IDSA Hand Hygiene
Task Force. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report 2002;51 (RR-16).
6. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. Methods
for Dilution Antimicrobial Susceptibility Tests for Bacteria that Grow Aerobically.
Fifth Edition. Approved Standard NCCLS Document M7-A5, Vol. 20, No. 2, NCCLS,
Wayne, PA, January 2000.
7. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. Twelfth
Informational Supplement. Approved NCCLS Document M100-S12, Vol. 21, No. 1,
NCCLS, Wayne, PA, January 2002.
8. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. Performance
Standards for Antimicrobial Disk Susceptibility Tests. Seventh Edition. Approved
Standard NCCLS Document M2-A7, Vol. 20, No. 1, NCCLS, Wayne, PA, January 2000.
11. Fine MJ, Auble TE, Yealy DM, et al. A Prediction Rule to
Identify Low-Risk Patients with Community-Acquired Pneumonia. The New England
Journal of Medicine. 1997;336 (4):243250.
Last updated on RxList: 7/24/2008